A. Y.

2018-2019
Performance Task in Quantitative Research
First Quarter

Deciding on a Research Topic

G-oal To identify a topic of interest and focus the topic of interest

R-ole An upperclassman who have background knowledge in doing a Research

A-udience Lowerclassmen in junior high school, teachers, panelists

S-ituation You are assigned to present a research topic that is relevant to your school.

P-roduct Identified topic and working title

S-tandards for Success The topic and title should have the following:
- researchable and feasible
- available and accessible
- can sustain the researcher’s interest
- identify the target audience of the research

Assessment Rubric for Research Topic and Title

Excellent Good Needs Improvement

Category Score
8-10 points 5-7 points 0-4 points
Researchable; data Feasible to Very broad/ general;
available ans conduct; data may no clear focus on the
accessible; clear be available but not topic of the study
Topic
focus on topic of all are accessible;
the study clear focus on topic
of interest

Clearly articulated; Clear focus but can No clear indication of

brief and succint; still be articulated the focus of the topic
with indications of briefly and of interest; long and
Title
the research succintly; with little ambiguous; no hint of
paradigm to be indication of the the research pradigm
used research paradigm to be used
 to be applied

Total Score

A. Y. 2018-2019
Performance Task in Quantitative Research
Second Quarter

Research Introduction

G-oal To write a research introduction

R-ole An upperclassman who have background knowledge in doing a Research

A-udience Lowerclassmen in junior high school, teachers, panelists

S-ituation You are assigned to write a research problem; contextualize your research
problem, state and describe your research

P-roduct Research Introduction/ Chapter 1 of the Research

S-tandards for Success The main body of Chapter 1 should contain the following:
- The background of the study
 - Statement of the problem
- Research objectives
- The purpose of the study (whether to describe, understand, develop, or
discover something)
- Research Hypothesis
- Theoretical/ Conceptual Framework
- Definition of terms

Rubric for Research Introduction

Needs
Excellent Very Good Good
Category Improvement Score
9-10 points 7-8 points 5-6
1-4 points
The A fairly well The background of The background
background of formulated the study is not of the study is
Background of the study is well background of well constructed badly written
the Study formulated the study because it lacks a
proper
introduction

Very clearly Fairly well Statement of the Lacks a proper

explained posed statement problem is not statement of the
statement of the of the problem clearly stated problem.
Statement of problem and that provided and/or lacks Evidence
the Problem supported high evidence but quality evidence to presented does
quality (strong) evidence is not support the not support the
evidence as strong as it problem thesis or problem
could be statement

Research Research Research The proposal does

objectives are objectives is objectives are not not state research
very clearly fairly well clearly stated and/ objective
stated and it stated and it or does not
Research connects very connects very connect well to the
Objectives well to the well to the introduction and
introduction introduction the statement of
and the and the the problem
statement of the statement of the
problem problem

Has clearly Fairly well The significance of Paper does not

Significance of presented the stated the the study is not state the
the Study and significance of significance of clearly stated. It significance of
Scope and the study. It has the study. It has does not explain the study and the
Limitation explained very fairly explained the importance and scope and
clearly the the importance relevance of the limitation
 importance and and relevance research
relevance of the of the research
research
Has not explained
Has fairly clearly the scope
Has clearly presented the and limitation of
presented the scope and the study and the
scope and limitation of the areas that will not
limitation of the study including be covered in the
study including areas that will study
areas that will not be covered
not be covered in the study.
in the study.

Well stated Fairly well Stated research Lacks a

research stated research hypothesis is hypothesis or the
hypothesis hypothesis unclearobased on hypothesis
based on the based on the the pupose if the presented does
pupose of the pupose of the study. Meets less not support the
Research study. Follows study. Follows than 80% of the purpose of the
Hypothesis and meets the and meets guidelines for study, Fails to use
guidelines for greater than hypothesis the guidelines for
hypothesis 80% of the development. hypothesis
development. guidelines for development
hypothesis
development.

The research The research The research The research

proposal has proposal has proposal has proposal does not
clearly stated fairly stated the clearly not stated stated the
the framework framework of the framework of framework of the
of the research. the research. It the research. It research. It does
It clearly fairly explains does not clearly not explain the
explains the the relationship explain the relationship of the
relationship of of the research relationship of the research variables
the research variables with research variables with each other. It
Theoretical /
variables with each other. It with each other. It does not discusses
Conceptual
each other. It discusses fairly does not discuss extensively how
Framework
discusses how the extensively how the theoretical
extensively how theoretical and the theoretical and and conceptual
the theoretical conceptual conceptual framework is
and conceptual framework is framework is relevant to the
framework is relevant to the relevant to the research topic/
relevant to the research topic/ research topic/ problem/ research
research topic/ problem/ problem/ research
problem/ research
research
Clearly defines Fairly defines Key terms used in The proposal does
Definition of the key terms the key terms the research are not have a
Terms used in the used in the not clearly defined definition of
research research in the research terms.
 proposal. proposal. proposal. Operationsal and
Operational and Operational and Operational and conceptual
conceptual conceptual conceptual definitions are not
definitions are definitions are definitions are not stated in the
clearly stated. fairly stated. clearly stated. proposal

Articulates Although a Identifies a Statement of the

clear, research issue is relevant research problem,
reasonable identifies, the issue. Research significance,
research statement of the questions are purpose,
quetions given problem is too succintly stated, questions/
the purpose, broad, or the connected to the hypotheses, ore
design, and description fails research issue and definitions of
methods of the to establish the supported by the constructs and
proposed study. importance of literature. variables were
All constructs the problem Constructs and omitted or
Overall
and variables area. The variables have inappropriate.
Quality of the
have been research been identified and
Research
appropriately purpose, described.
Introduction
defined. questions, Connections are
Propositions are hypotheses, or established with
clearly definitions of the literature.
supported from constructs and
each research variables are
and theoretical poorly formed,
literature. All ambiguous, or
elements are not logically
mutually connected to
supportive. the description

Total Score
 A.Y. 2018-2019
Performance Task in Quantitative Research
Third Quarter

Writing a Review of Related Literature

G-oal To write a review of related literature

R-ole An upperclassman who have background knowledge in doing a Research

A-udience Lowerclassmen in junior high school, teachers, panelists

S-ituation You are assigned to write a review of related literature

P-roduct Five-to-ten-page Review of Related Literature/ Chapter 2 of the Research

S-tandards for Success The structure of your literature review should contain the following:
- a sypnosis of the subject, proble, or theory under contemplation, along with
the purposes of the literature review
- dissection of works under review into themes or categories
- an explanation of how each work is alike to and differs from the others
- conclusions as to which parts are best considered in the argument and can
make a contribution to the appreciation and enhancement of the pertinent area
of research
 Rubric for Review of Related Literature

Excellent Good Needs Improvement

Criteria Score
8-10 points 4-7 points 1-3 points
Comprehensive Good literature Not good literature
Quality of and good material but importance of material
Literature used; established study not
importance to study established

Relevant Relevant literature Relevance not

literature; clear link butr link between considered
Relevance to the
between topic and topic and literature
topic
literature not established
established

All cited works are Some cited works Few cited or no

done in the correct are done in the citation of sources
Citation format with no correct format. used in the review
errors Inconsistencies
evident

Organized clearly Organized Disorganized;

outlined outlined but confusing
Organization
sequencing of
topics illogical

Writing Quality Free of Writing clear but Not clearly written;

(grammar, linking grammatical errors; with a few many grammatical
statements, proper clearly written grammatical and and spelling errors
use of words, etc.) spelling errors

Total Score

A.Y. 2018-2019
Performance Task in Quantitative
Third Quarter

Design a Plan for Procedures to be Used in a Research

G-oal To write a research design and methodology for research

R-ole An upperclassman who have background knowledge in doing a Research

A-udience Lowerclassmen in junior high school, teachers, panelists

S-ituation You are assigned to design or formulate a plan for procedures/ methods for
your research

P-roduct Research Design and Methodology/ Chapter 3 of the research

S-tandards for Success The structure of your Chapter 3 should contain the following:
- research design, sampling and sampling procedure, variables, instruments and
data analysis procedure

Rubric for Research Design and Methodology

Excellent Good Needs Improvement

Criteria Score
15-20 points 8-14 points 1-7 points
Appropriate Appropriate design Inappropriate
design chosen; chosen; good research design
good definition of definition of the chosen; lacks a clear
the design; design; but lacks articulation of the
demonstrates complete rationale for selecting
Research Design familiarity with the understanding of the design; innacurate
defining features of the key characterization of
the design, characteristics of the design
including strengths the design chosen
and weaknesses of
the design

Elaborate Lacks detailed Shows no familiarity

Sampling and
description of the description of the with sampling and
Sampling
sample and sample and sampling procedure
Procedure
sampling procedure sampling procedure

Clear operational Clear operational Lacks clear

definitions of definitions of operational
variables; clear and variables but definitions of
Variables sufficient indicators insufficient variables; innacurate
for the variables indicators used for indicators for
the variables in the variables
study

Elaborate Instruments for the Poor description of

Instruments description of the study are not instruments for the
instruments used. sufficiently study
described and
 justified

Clear description of Insufficient No clear idea about

data; clear plan for description of data; needed data; no clear
analyzing and insufficient indication of data
Data Analysis interpreting data, articulation of data analysis and
Procedures including the analysis and interpretation
identification interpretation procedured
needed statistical procedures
tests

Total Score
 A.Y. 2018-2019
Performance Task in Quantitative
Fourth Quarter

Reporting and Sharing Findings

G-oal To report and share the finding of the research

R-ole An upperclassman who have background knowledge in doing a Research

A-udience Lowerclassmen in junior high school, teachers, panelists

S-ituation You are assigned to present and defend the findings of your research; and give
recommendations from your research

P-roduct Quantitative Research Paper and Oral Presentation

S-tandards for Success Rubric for the Quantitative Research and Rubric for Oral Defense

Rubric for Quantitative Research Paper

CATEGORY 5 4 3 2 1 SCORE

Title Page Title, student’s Clearly Incompletely Evidence of 2 Poorly evident

name, teacher’s organized organized or less and organized
name, course
period, date,
neatly
finished-no
errors. Well
organized

RESEARCH Clearly and Clearly states the Somehow states Incomplete and Poorly evident
PROBLEM concisely states paper’s purpose. the paper’s unfocused. and organized
the paper’s purpose.
purpose in a
single sentence,
which is
engaging, and
thought
provoking

CHAPTER 1 The introduction The introduction The introduction There is no Poorly evident
is engaging, clearly states the states the main clear and organized
previews the main problem of problem of the introduction or
structure of the the study and study but does main problem
paper and states other not adequately of the study and
the SOTP, SAD, components of preview the the structure of
SOTS and DOF. chapter 1, and structure of the the paper is
previews the paper. missing.
structure of the
paper.

CHAPTER 2 Each paragraph Each paragraph Each paragraph Each paragraph Content is not
AND 3 has thoughtful has sufficient lacks supporting fails to develop applicable to
supporting detail supporting detail detail sentences. the main idea. the said study
sentences that sentences that
develop the develop the main Used few insufficient
main idea. Used idea. Used some related litt. and related litt. and
sufficient related related litt. and studies. Used studies. Used
litt. and studies. studies. Used research research
Used research research methodology methodology.
methodology methodology correctly.
correctly. correctly.

CHAPTER 4 Used Used Used Used Didn’t used

graphs/tables in graphs/tables in graphs/tables in graphs/tables in graphs/tables in
presenting data. presenting data. presenting data. presenting data. presenting data.
Writer Paragraph But Logical But no evidence And has no
demonstrates development organization of of structure or evidence of
logical and present but not ideas was not organization structure or
subtle perfected. fully organization
sequencing of developed. .
ideas through
well-developed
paragraphs;
transitions are
used to enhance
 organization.

CHAPTER 5 Complete Summary of Summary of Incomplete No summary of

summary of findings is clear. findings is summary of findings and/or
findings. The The conclusion inconsistent The findings and/or conclusion.
conclusion is restates the conclusion does unfocused Recommendati
engaging and research not adequately conclusion. ons need total
restates the problem. Most restate the Most revision.
research recommendation research Recommendati
problem. s were objective. problem. Some ons are
Recommendatio Recommendatio subjective.
ns were ns were
objective. subjective.

MECHANICS No errors in Almost no errors Many errors in Numerous and Poorly written.
grammar, in grammar, grammar, distracting
punctuation, punctuation, punctuation, errors in
capitalization, capitalization, capitalization grammar,
bullets, page bullets, page bullets, page punctuation,
numbers and numbers and numbers and capitalization,
spelling. spelling. spelling. bullets, page
numbers and
spelling.

CITATION All cited works, Some cited Inconsistencies Few cited Poorly evident
AND both text and works, both text evident. works, both text
APPENDIX visual, are done and visual, are and visual, are
in the correct done in the done in the
APA format correct APA correct format.
with no errors. format.
BIBLIOGRAPHY Done in the Done in the Done in the Done in the Less than 5
correct format correct format correct format correct format references were
with no errors. with few errors. . with some with many used.
Includes more Includes 10 errors. Includes errors. Includes
than 10 major major references. 8 major 6-7 major
references references. references.

Total Score /45

Oral Defense Rubric

General Specific 1-3 4-6 7-9 10 Score

Attribute Element
Quality of Organization Poorly Inconsistently Clearly Well organized
presentatio organized organized organized
n
Presentation Poor Inconsistent Clear Excellent
style presentation presentation presentation presentation

Communication Poor Limited Good Excellent

skills communication communication communication communication
skills skills skills skills

Visuals Slides/handouts Slides/handouts Slides/handouts Slides/handouts

are difficult to are of are clear
 read inconsistent are outstanding
quality.

Cognitive Depth of Depth of Depth of Depth of Depth of

Skills knowledge knowledge is knowledge is knowledge is knowledge is
unsatisfactory weak satisfactory outstanding

Breadth of Breadth of Breadth of Breadth of Breadth of

knowledge knowledge knowledge is knowledge knowledge
unsatisfactory limited satisfactory outstanding
Critical thinking Presentation Presentation Presentation Presentation
does not reflect reveals reveals above reveals
well-developed minimal/limite average critical well-developed
critical d critical thinking skills critical thinking
thinking skills thinking skills skills

Assimilation of Presentation Presentation Presentation Presentation

knowledge is narrow in reveals a reveals the reveals the
scope limited ability ability to draw ability to
to draw from from interconnect and
knowledge in knowledge in extend
different several knowledge from
disciplines disciplines multiple
disciplines

Response Completeness Responses are Responses Responses Responses are

to incomplete or satisfy are complete eloquent
Questions require questions only
prompting minimally

Conduct when Responses are Only a portion Responses are Responses are
challenged flustered or of responses appropriate reflective of an
defensive are of for a junior experienced
acceptable researcher researcher
quality

Total
/100

Prepared by:
Genesis C. Aguilar

Noted by:
Mr. Eusebio M. Basas

Approved by:
Ms. Grace G. Vargas