Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(https://theconstructor.org/)
It is crucial for engineer to have adequate information regarding possible ground movements and identify its
characteristics to consider proper measures against such undesired movement.
Characteristics of ground movements include shape and type of ground surface settlement, influence zones of
settlement, locations of maximum settlement, magnitude of maximum settlement and relationship between
ground surface settlements and soil movements are discussed in the following sections.
If the initial stage of excavation induces greater retaining wall deflection or the retaining wall deflect similar to a
cantilever beam, then the settlement will be spandrel type and the maximum settlement will be close to the
excavation area, as it is illustrated in Figure 2.
https://theconstructor.org/practical-guide/ground-movements-induced-by-excavations/21614/?utm_source=pushengage&utm_medium=push_notif… 1/4
6/4/2018 Characteristics of Ground Movements Induced by Excavations
Fig.2: Spandrel shape ground surface settlement induced due to cantilever shape deflection of
retaining wall
However, concave type settlement will occur provided that the wall has a deep inward movement as shown in
Figure 3 and the largest settlement magnitude will be positioned at a distance from the excavation.
Fig.3: Concave shape ground surface settlement caused by deep inward movement of retaining wall
Moreover, it is demonstrated that spandrel settlement type is frequently occurred in sandy soil and stiff clay since
the deflection of retaining wall is smaller and it is like cantilever beam deflection.
However, spandrel shape settlement is mostly occurred in soft clay soil since the retaining wall would suffer from
considerable deep inward deflection. These statements are valid for normal conditions.
Furthermore, formula has been developed to anticipate the shape of settlement based on the retaining wall
deflection.
Parameter used to predict ground surface settlement are area of cantilever component deflection (Ac=max (Ac1,
Ac2)), and area of total deflection minus area of cantilever component deflection (As).
Lastly, if the As is large than 1.6Ac, then concave shape ground surface settlement will be highly likely to cure
whereas spandrel type will occur provided that As is smaller than 1.6Ac. Figure 4 illustrate the definition of
different parameters used for the prediction of shape of ground surface settlement.
Hsieh and Ou proposed a conception that the influence zone of settlement curve is composed of primary influence
zone and secondary settlement zone as illustrated in Figure 5.
https://theconstructor.org/practical-guide/ground-movements-induced-by-excavations/21614/?utm_source=pushengage&utm_medium=push_notif… 2/4
6/4/2018 Characteristics of Ground Movements Induced by Excavations
As it may be observed from the figure, the curve steeper in primary influence zone which means buildings will be
affected greatly whereas the curve is gentler in the secondary influence zone and hence the affect on the structure
will be smaller.
It is possible that the influence zone of settlement exceeds primary and secondary settlement zone, but it is so
small that its influence on the structure can be neglected.
The evaluation of influence zone of settlement range is considerably significant to evaluate the extent of damage
that adjacent structures might suffer due to deep excavations.
When the former type occurs, the maximum settlement will be close to the retaining wall. However, the retaining
wall is reported to occur at a distance of 1.5 times the height of retaining wall in the case concave settlement.
Nonetheless, it is practically measured that maximum settlement distance from the retaining wall, in the case of
concave settlement shape, is equal to the primary influence zone divided by three. The primary influence zone is
explained in the influence zone of settlement in the above section.
This method does not provide accurate outcome because the excavation depth is not the only factor that affect the
settlement. Moreover, (Mana and Clough, and Ou et. el.) established a relationship to compute the maximum
settlement magnitude.
They have derived a relationship between maximum retaining wall deformation and maximum ground settlement
because factors that influence maximum retaining wall deformation are the same as those affecting magnitude of
maximum settlement induced by excavation.
https://theconstructor.org/practical-guide/ground-movements-induced-by-excavations/21614/?utm_source=pushengage&utm_medium=push_notif… 3/4
6/4/2018 Characteristics of Ground Movements Induced by Excavations
Figure 6 show the relationship between maximum retaining wall settlement and magnitude of the maximum
settlement for different types of soil with upper limit for sandy soil and lower limit for clay soil.
So, the maximum deformation of retaining wall caused by excavation can be evaluated using finite element
method or beam on elastic foundation method. Finally, the maximum deformation of retaining wall will be used to
compute maximum settlement magnitude with the help of the figure.
Fig.6: Relationship between maximum ground surface settlement and lateral deformation of retaining
wall
https://theconstructor.org/practical-guide/ground-movements-induced-by-excavations/21614/?utm_source=pushengage&utm_medium=push_notif… 4/4