Republic of the Philippines

B I CO L U N I V E R S I T Y
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
GEODETIC ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
BU East Campus, Legazpi City 4500

GRADING SHEET

Title: “Determining Potential Evacuation Shelter Sites Using GIS and AHP: A Case
Study in Legazpi City”

Criteria/Guiding Questions Weight Rating

1. How was the title stated? Does it follow the principle of 20%
economy of words and neutrality? Was stated in an interesting
manner? Does it reflect the problem of the study? Is the
introduction well-written? Does it present the rationale for the
problem? How was the problem stated? Is the problem
interesting? Is the scope of the study properly
presented/discussed? Is the significance of the study
adequately discussed/presented?
2. Schematic Presentation of the Theoretical & Conceptual 20%
Frameworks. Are the two frameworks supportive of the
research problem? Hypothesis of the Study. How was the
hypothesis stated? Was it well-stated or well-formulated?
3. Research Method/s Used. Judging from the materials 40%
presented, is there really a research gap? Does this support the
way the research problem was formulated?
4. Is the review of related literature and related studies adequate? 10%
How do you assess the way the author made a synthesis of the
related literature and studies?
5. Poster Design and Clarity. 10%

TOTAL 100%

ENGR. ANA MARIE ABANTE

Chairman

ENGR. MICHAEL COBILLA

Member
 Republic of the Philippines
B I CO L U N I V E R S I T Y
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
GEODETIC ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
BU East Campus, Legazpi City 4500

GRADING SHEET

Title: “Determining Potential Evacuation Shelter Sites Using GIS and AHP: A Case
Study in Legazpi City”

Criteria/Guiding Questions Weight Rating

1. How was the title stated? Does it follow the principle of 20%
economy of words and neutrality? Was stated in an interesting
manner? Does it reflect the problem of the study? Is the
introduction well-written? Does it present the rationale for the
problem? How was the problem stated? Is the problem
interesting? Is the scope of the study properly
presented/discussed? Is the significance of the study
adequately discussed/presented?
2. Schematic Presentation of the Theoretical & Conceptual 20%
Frameworks. Are the two frameworks supportive of the
research problem? Hypothesis of the Study. How was the
hypothesis stated? Was it well-stated or well-formulated?
3. Research Method/s Used. Judging from the materials 40%
presented, is there really a research gap? Does this support the
way the research problem was formulated?
4. Is the review of related literature and related studies adequate? 10%
How do you assess the way the author made a synthesis of the
related literature and studies?
5. Poster Design and Clarity. 10%

TOTAL 100%

ENGR. ANA MARIE ABANTE

Chairman

ENGR. JOHN PATRICK ROSALADA

Member
 Republic of the Philippines
B I CO L U N I V E R S I T Y
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
GEODETIC ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
BU East Campus, Legazpi City 4500

GRADING SHEET

Title: “Determining Potential Evacuation Shelter Sites Using GIS and AHP: A Case
Study in Legazpi City”

Criteria/Guiding Questions Weight Rating

1. How was the title stated? Does it follow the principle of 20%
economy of words and neutrality? Was stated in an interesting
manner? Does it reflect the problem of the study? Is the
introduction well-written? Does it present the rationale for the
problem? How was the problem stated? Is the problem
interesting? Is the scope of the study properly
presented/discussed? Is the significance of the study
adequately discussed/presented?
2. Schematic Presentation of the Theoretical & Conceptual 20%
Frameworks. Are the two frameworks supportive of the
research problem? Hypothesis of the Study. How was the
hypothesis stated? Was it well-stated or well-formulated?
3. Research Method/s Used. Judging from the materials 40%
presented, is there really a research gap? Does this support the
way the research problem was formulated?
4. Is the review of related literature and related studies adequate? 10%
How do you assess the way the author made a synthesis of the
related literature and studies?
5. Poster Design and Clarity. 10%

TOTAL 100%

ENGR. ANA MARIE ABANTE

Chairman
 Republic of the Philippines
B I CO L U N I V E R S I T Y
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
GEODETIC ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
BU East Campus, Legazpi City 4500

GRADING SHEET

Title: “Determining Potential Evacuation Shelter Sites Using GIS and AHP: A Case
Study in Legazpi City”

Criteria/Guiding Questions Weight Rating

1. How was the title stated? Does it follow the principle of 20%
economy of words and neutrality? Was stated in an interesting
manner? Does it reflect the problem of the study? Is the
introduction well-written? Does it present the rationale for the
problem? How was the problem stated? Is the problem
interesting? Is the scope of the study properly
presented/discussed? Is the significance of the study
adequately discussed/presented?
2. Schematic Presentation of the Theoretical & Conceptual 20%
Frameworks. Are the two frameworks supportive of the
research problem? Hypothesis of the Study. How was the
hypothesis stated? Was it well-stated or well-formulated?
3. Research Method/s Used. Judging from the materials 40%
presented, is there really a research gap? Does this support the
way the research problem was formulated?
4. Is the review of related literature and related studies adequate? 10%
How do you assess the way the author made a synthesis of the
related literature and studies?
5. Poster Design and Clarity. 10%

TOTAL 100%

ENGR. ANA MARIE ABANTE

Chairman

ENGR. ULYSSES BELLO

Member
 Republic of the Philippines
B I CO L U N I V E R S I T Y
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
GEODETIC ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
BU East Campus, Legazpi City 4500

GRADING SHEET

Title: “Determining Potential Evacuation Shelter Sites Using GIS and AHP: A Case
Study in Legazpi City”

Criteria/Guiding Questions Weight Rating

1. How was the title stated? Does it follow the principle of 20%
economy of words and neutrality? Was stated in an interesting
manner? Does it reflect the problem of the study? Is the
introduction well-written? Does it present the rationale for the
problem? How was the problem stated? Is the problem
interesting? Is the scope of the study properly
presented/discussed? Is the significance of the study
adequately discussed/presented?
2. Schematic Presentation of the Theoretical & Conceptual 20%
Frameworks. Are the two frameworks supportive of the
research problem? Hypothesis of the Study. How was the
hypothesis stated? Was it well-stated or well-formulated?
3. Research Method/s Used. Judging from the materials 40%
presented, is there really a research gap? Does this support the
way the research problem was formulated?
4. Is the review of related literature and related studies adequate? 10%
How do you assess the way the author made a synthesis of the
related literature and studies?
5. Poster Design and Clarity. 10%

TOTAL 100%

ENGR. ANA MARIE ABANTE

Chairman

ENGR. ULYSSES FUNDANO

Member
 Republic of the Philippines
B I CO L U N I V E R S I T Y
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
GEODETIC ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
BU East Campus, Legazpi City 4500

GRADING SHEET

Title: “Determining Potential Evacuation Shelter Sites Using GIS and AHP: A Case
Study in Legazpi City”

Criteria/Guiding Questions Weight Rating

1. How was the title stated? Does it follow the principle of 20%
economy of words and neutrality? Was stated in an interesting
manner? Does it reflect the problem of the study? Is the
introduction well-written? Does it present the rationale for the
problem? How was the problem stated? Is the problem
interesting? Is the scope of the study properly
presented/discussed? Is the significance of the study
adequately discussed/presented?
2. Schematic Presentation of the Theoretical & Conceptual 20%
Frameworks. Are the two frameworks supportive of the
research problem? Hypothesis of the Study. How was the
hypothesis stated? Was it well-stated or well-formulated?
3. Research Method/s Used. Judging from the materials 40%
presented, is there really a research gap? Does this support the
way the research problem was formulated?
4. Is the review of related literature and related studies adequate? 10%
How do you assess the way the author made a synthesis of the
related literature and studies?
5. Poster Design and Clarity. 10%

TOTAL 100%

ENGR. ANA MARIE ABANTE

Chairman

ENP. MILADEE N. AZUR

Member
 Republic of the Philippines
B I CO L U N I V E R S I T Y
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
GEODETIC ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
BU East Campus, Legazpi City 4500

GRADING SHEET

Title: “Determining Potential Evacuation Shelter Sites Using GIS and AHP: A Case
Study in Legazpi City”

Criteria/Guiding Questions Weight Rating

1. How was the title stated? Does it follow the principle of 20%
economy of words and neutrality? Was stated in an interesting
manner? Does it reflect the problem of the study? Is the
introduction well-written? Does it present the rationale for the
problem? How was the problem stated? Is the problem
interesting? Is the scope of the study properly
presented/discussed? Is the significance of the study
adequately discussed/presented?
2. Schematic Presentation of the Theoretical & Conceptual 20%
Frameworks. Are the two frameworks supportive of the
research problem? Hypothesis of the Study. How was the
hypothesis stated? Was it well-stated or well-formulated?
3. Research Method/s Used. Judging from the materials 40%
presented, is there really a research gap? Does this support the
way the research problem was formulated?
4. Is the review of related literature and related studies adequate? 10%
How do you assess the way the author made a synthesis of the
related literature and studies?
5. Poster Design and Clarity. 10%

TOTAL 100%

ENGR. ANA MARIE ABANTE

Chairman

ENP. FRANCIA OCTEZA

Member