Professional Documents
Culture Documents
”.
COPY: RETURN TO
AFLYL TECHNICAL LIBRARY
KiRfLAND AFB, M. M.
Raymond L. Burger
__ 8
-...
..
Lungley Reseurch Center
H u n p o n , Va. 23 665
.‘
,
. DECEMBER 1975
‘ , 1 1 ,
\
TECH LIBRARY KAFB, N M
IIlli1l1l11l1ll111111llllll1HIIl
1. Report No.
NASA TN D-8117
4. Title and Subtitle
1 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No.
5. Report Date
ADAPTATION O F THE THEODORSEN THEORY TO THE December 1975
REPRESENTATION O F AN AIRFOIL AS A COMBINATION 6. Performing Organization Code
O F A LIFTING LINE AND A THICKNESS DISTRIBUTION
7. Author(s)
Raymond L. B a r g e r
6. Abstract
For sale by the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 221 61
I
Raymond L. Barger
Langley Research Center
SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
SYMBOLS
An 9 % Fourier coefficients
= Re - G O
a
CP p r e s s u r e coefficient
V local velocity
(Y angle of attack
OI
ideal angle of attack, - ‘N + ‘te
2
(YO
angle of attack a t z e r o lift
E function relating angular coordinates of near -circle and exact -circle airfoil
transformations
2
G angular coordinate in near -circle plane
+O
average value of +
Subscripts:
a antisymmetric
S sym metric
BASIC CONCEPTS
Potential Theory
Before reviewing some thin-airfoil techniques, i t is convenient f i r s t to state the
basic formulas of the Theodorsen transformation theory for airfoil analysis. These for -
mulas are useful in understanding the following discussion of thin-airfoil techniques, and
they a r e required in the subsequent analysis section.
The Theodorsen airfoil theory (ref. 2) involves the Joukowski transformation of the
airfoil into a shape approximating a c i r c l e . In the transformed plane, this near c i r c l e is
described by polar coordinates (r,O). The approximate c i r c l e is then transformed into
an exact c i r c l e having coordinates (R,$). The function + and the constant q0 are
defined by r = aeq and R = ae'o. Theodorsen shows that is the average value
of +,
that is,
3
and that the functions Q - Qo and E = @ - 8 are related by the conjugate equations
IC/ - +bo = -
237 0
1 @*- @ d@*
1 2a E cot -
2 (3)
The function +b is directly related to the airfoil coordinates in the physical plane by
x = 2a cosh Q c o s 6'
(4)
y = 2a sinh IC/ s i n 8
4
n e s s distribution superimposed on i t in 2. vertical direction (fig. l(c)), is an even poorer
approximation. With this procedure, not only is the thickness distribution distorted, but
the effective camber line is changed also.
A theory that avoids some of the difficulties of the thin-airfoil methods is described
in the following section.
m
-E = - ( B ~ cos ne - A, sin nej
-1
L Rn
n=0
$I - qo = -(An
1 cos ne + Bn sin ne)
LJ Rn
n=0
Now consider first the c a s e for which E is antisymmetric about a (fig. 2(a));
that is, €(a-6) = -€(a+@. Then Bn = 0 f o r all n, and therefore the conjugate function
+ - q0 is symmetric about a (fig. 2(a)). Since +o is constant, +(a-e) = +(n+f?).
Consequently cosh +(n-e) = cosh +(n+e) and sinh +(n-e) = sinh +(a+e). Thus in equa-
tions (4)f o r the airfoil coordinates, x(n+8) = x(n-e); that is, x is symmetric with
5
respect to n. But because the s i n 6 factor is an odd function, y is antisymmetric;
that is, y(n-I-6)= -y(n-6). In other words, since 6 = n corresponds to the trailing edge,
the airfoil is s y m m e t r i c , and s o it r e p r e s e n t s a thickness distribution (fig. 2(b)) with the
s a m e p r e s s u r e distribution for upper and lower s u r f a c e s (fig. 2(c)). The maximum thick-
n e s s is controlled by the average value *o of *.
It is easily verified that f o r symmetric airfoils (thickness distributions) the condi-
tions expressed by equations (7) and (8) a r e a s s u r e d by the antisymmetry of the €-function
together with the continuity conditions. F u r t h e r m o r e i t is seen from figure 2(a) that, in
this c a s e , both e N and ete vanish. Thus the angle of attack a t z e r o lift a. = -ete
-.
and the ideal angle of attack crI = - E N -t- Ete a r e both z e r o , as expected for a symmetric
2
airfoil. These a r e important aerodynamic p a r a m e t e r s because E te is proportional to
the lift at CY = 0 and because aI is useful in locating the bucket of the drag curve (see
pt. I11 of r e f . 5). When the converse situation, f o r which E is symmetric about n
(fig. 3(a)), is considered, Q is antisymmetric about 71 (fig. 3(a)), provided that Qo = 0.
In that c a s e , x(n+8) = x(n-e) because cosh i s an even function of i t s argument. Also
y(ni-e) = y(n-e) because the product of the two odd functions sinh Q and sin 6 is even.
In other words the upper and lower surfaces a r e identical, and the airfoil consists of a
single line (fig. 3(b)). Its p r e s s u r e distribution is shown in figure 3(c).
F o r such a lifting line the E-function must satisfy
CYI = - + is positive.
2
Now consider the €-function that results from adding the e-function for the lifting
line to that of the symmetric airfoil. If neither €-function is identically zero, the sum is
neither symmetric nor antisymmetric about n. (See fig. 4(a) .) Since both component
€-functions a r e continuous and satisfy the conditions expressed by equations (7) and (8),
the resultant E-function also satisfies these conditions, and s o E corresponds to a r e a l
airfoil. Also, since Ete and a r e both z e r o for the symmetric airfoil, these parain-
e t e r s have the same values in the resulting e-function as for the lifting line. This means
that the airfoil corresponding to the resultant E-function has the s a m e angle of attack at
z e r o lift and the s a m e design lift coefficient as that of the lifting line.
6
In o r d e r t o construct an airfoil corresponding to the €-function obtained by adding
those of a lifting line and of a thickness distribution, it is necessary to have the c o r r e -
sponding + - qb0 function. This function can be obtained as the conjugate of E, o r , if
the +-functions f o r both component airfoils are known, i t is obtained simply by adding the
+ - +o functions f o r the components. The parameter +o should be assigned the s a m e
value as that f o r the symmetric airfoil since the value of q0 f o r the lifting line is zero.
Then the airfoil coordinates are determined by equations (4),and the velocity distribution
is computed from equation (5). Results f o r the sample c a s e a r e shown in figures 4(b)
and 4(c).
The constant Q0 is basically a thickness p a r a m e t e r , but this does not necessarily
mean that the maximum thickness of the resultant airfoil will be exactly the s a m e as that
of the original thickness distribution, although it should be very nearly the s a m e . How-
e v e r , the important factor, e%, in the velocity equation (5) will be exactly the s a m e as
that f o r the thickness distribution. This factor is not a function of position on the airfoil,
and so i t determines the level of the velocity curves independently of the details of the
shape of the airfoil.
Thus it is seen that this method of combining a lifting line and a thickness distribu-
tion to synthesize an airfoil has a m o r e precise aerodynamic significance than the thin-
airfoil methods. The resultant airfoil has the s a m e angle of attack at z e r o lift and ideal
angle of attack as the lifting line and the same velocity-amplitude factor e@O as the
original thickness profile. Its pitching moment is not exactly the s a m e as that of the lift-
ing line, because the pitching moment is not entirely independent of the thickness distribu-
tion according to the f u l l potential theory. The procedure may be summarized as follows:
(1) Determine the @-functions for the thickness and lifting-line components from
their coordinates. Compute the average value @o of @ f o r the thickness distribution
and then compute the conjugate E-functions from equation (2).
(2) Add the E-functions and the @-functions to obtain those f o r the resultant airfoil.
(3) Obtain the resultant airfoil coordinates from equations (4) and the velocity d i s -
tribution for this airfoil from equation (5).
If one intends to maintain a catalog of thickness distributions and lifting lines, he
should also maintain a file of the corresponding E- and @-functions. The simple addition
of a p a i r of these functions yields the resultant transformation functions from which both
the coordinates and the velocity distribution for this airfoil can be obtained.
7
resolve them into their symmetric and antisymmetric p a r t s (fig. 6). The formulas (for
the E-function) are
The first of these functions, eS, corresponds to the lifting line, and e a c o r r e -
sponds to the thickness distribution. Conversely, when - +
is resolved into its
components, the symmetric p a r t corresponds to the thickness distribution, and IC/, is
set equal to that of the original airfoil. F o r the antisymmetric part of +
- t,b0, c o r r e -
sponding to the lifting line, Go = 0. The I$- and €-functions for each of these components
can then be used to compute the profiles f r o m equations (4) (figs. 5(b) and 5(c)) and the
velocity distributions from equation (5) (fig. 7).
Application of the theory to altering certain properties of an airfoil can be demon-
s t r a t e d by a r a t h e r extreme exarnple. The airfoil of figure 5(a) is taken as the basic
shape. Its lift at z e r o angle of attack is increased by 50 percent by adding to the E-function
at ~ 0~= 0 to
of its lifting line (fig. G(c)) a bilinear function that i n c r e a s e s from - 0 . 5 ~
+0.5ete a t 0 = .rr and then d e c r e a s e s linearly to - 0 . 5 at
~ ~ 0~= 271. The thickness of the
airfoil is increased from 10.7 percent to 15 percent by changing the value of q0 f o r the
thickness distribution (fig. 6(b)) from 0.10 to 0.137. The new E- a.nd +-functions a r e then
combined, and the resulting airfoil and i t s p r e s s u r e distribution a r e shown in figure 8.
If i t is desired to change the lifting-line component of an airfoil in o r d e r to r e d i s -
tribute the loading, the calculations should be c a r r i e d out a t the ideal angle of attack, a t
which the leading-edge velocity is not infinite for the lifting line. For example, the p r e s -
s u r e distributions shown in figure 9(a) (for the airfoil) and in figure 9(b) (for i t s lifting
line), which are computed at q, may be compared with those a t CY = 0 f o r the s a m e
airfoil and f o r i t s lifting line (figs. 4(c) and 3(c), respectively).
CONCLUDING REMARKS
8
method for resolving an airfoil into a lifting line and a thickness distribution as well
as a means of synthesizing thickness and lift components into a resultant airfoil and
computing i t s aerodynamic characteristics. Some specific applications of the technique
are discussed.
REFERENCES
1. Abbott, I r a H.; and Von Doenhoff, Albert E.: Theory of Wing Sections. Dover Publ.,
Inc., c. 1959.
2. Theodorsen, Theodore: Theory of Wing Sections of Arbitrary Shape. NACA Rep. 411,
19 3 1.
3. Theodorsen, T.; and Garrick, I. E.: General Potential Theory of Arbitrary Wing
Sections. NACA Rep. 452, 1933.
4. Allen, H. Julian: General Theory of Airfoil Sections Having Arbitrary Shape o r
P r e s s u r e Distribution. NACA Rep. 833, 1945.
5. Theodorsen, Theodore: On the Theory of Wing Sections With Particular Reference to
the Lift Distribution. NACA Rep. 383, 1931.
9
(a) Thickness distribution.
/--
10
.1 .2
a .1
-.l 0
-.2 ..1
0 IT
e
(a) Transformation functions.
I 1 I I I I I I _I
0 1 .o
(c) P r e s s u r e distribution. a! = 0.
Figure 2. - Calculations for symmetric airfoil (thickness distribution).
11
(a)Transformation functions.
Upper surface
.4 L I I I 1 . 1 I I 1 I J
0 1.0
x/c
(c) P r e s s u r e distribution. a! = 0.
Figure 3. - Calculations f o r lifting-line airfoil.
12
(a) Transformation functions obtained by adding functions of figure 2(a)
to corresponding functions of figure 3(a).
- .1
-.2
( c ) P r e s s u r e distribution. a! = 0.
Figure 4. - Theoretical r e s u l t s f o r airfoil synthesized f r o m thickness
distribution of figure 2 and lifting line of figure 3.
13
II
14
- . . .. . I
(a) Functions corresponding t o given airfoil.
I I I J -.1
7
7 2n
0
.1 .2
E
0 1
E ii
-.l 0
-.2 1
-.3 2
n
0
15
-.8
-.6
-.4
cp -.2
.2
.4 l I 1 I I l I l I l l
1 .o
x, c
-.6
-.4
cp -.2
.2
-.6
- .4
1
-.2
.2
.4
1
.6 I 1.0
x, c
16
(a) Revised airfoil shape.
-1.2
-1.0
- .8
-.6
-.4
- .2
\ r L o w e r surface \ ,
0
.2
.4 I I 1 1 1 1
, 0 1 .o
x/c
(b) P r e s s u r e distribution. a = 0.
Figure 8.- Redesign of airfoil of figure 5(a) to increase lift at z e r o
angle of attack by 50 percent and to increase thickness from
10.7 percent to 1 5 percent.
17
-.6
- .4 Upper surface
-.2
cP
Lower surface
0
.2
.4 I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1
1 1.0
x/c
Upper surface
Lower surface
1 ,J
DEFT OF THE R I B F O R C E
AF WEAPONS L A B O R A T O R Y
ATTN: TECHNICAL L I B R A R Y { S U L )
K I R T L A N D A P E NM 87117
*.
“The aeronautical and space activities of the United States shall be
’.
.
conducted so as to contribute . . t o the expansion of human h o w l -
edge of phenomena in the atmosphere and space. T h e Administration
shall provide for the widest practicable and appropriate dissemination
of information concerning its activities and the results thereof.”
-NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ACT OF 1958