Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Oxford University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Social Forces.
http://www.jstor.org
spicuously absent in this section is detailed discussion of the work of such schol-
ars commonly associated with the dramaturgicalperspective as Kenneth Burke,
Erving Goffmnan,and VictorTumer.Their ideas and others' are relegated to sum-
maries in the firstappendix, functioningmore or less as background.This arrange-
ment is consistent with Hare's aim to extend the dramaturgicalperspective by
"addinginsights from the study of interactionprocess and of functionalanalysis in
groups as well as from the writings of persons associated with the theater."While
certainlya worthwhile undertaking, the end result is less than satisfactory.Since
much work traditionallyassociated with dramaturgyin the social sciences is not
integratedwith Hare'sadditions, the product has something of the flavor of a wine
served before its time or a stew of potentially savory ingredients neither suffi-
ciently cooked nor properlyblended.
A hint of that potential manifests itself, however, in the second part of the
book. In these four chapters, some of the previously developed concepts are ap-
plied to protest demonstrationsin South Africa and Curacao,to conflict between
Greek and TurkishCypriots and among ethnic groups in Namibia and South Af-
rica, and to the Camp David summit meeting orchestratedby President Carterin
September 19,78.Two ideas are featured most prominently: the role of creative
ideas and definitions by one or more groups of actors, and the function and impor-
tance of staging.
Although Hare'svariantof dramaturgymay have considerableutility in ad-
vancing our understanding of collective action and intergroupconflict, its applica-
tion does not demonstrate systematically or compellingly its analytic advantage
over other perspectives. This shortcoming is largely due to the failure to discuss
any of the literatureon collective action other than Smelser'svalue-added theory.
In consequence, the readerunfamiliarwith this literaturehas little basis for assess-
ing whether Hare'sanalysis yields new or richerinsights.
This and the other limitationsnotwithstanding, Hare'sbook ought to be of
particular interest to social psychologists, especially those with an interest in
group processes, and to students of collective behavior and intergroup conflict.
Gender: An EthnomethodologicalApproach.
By SuzanneJ. Kesslerand WendyMcKenna.Universityof ChicagoPress, 1985. 233 pp.
$10.95.
Reviewer:
HARY LOU WYLIE, JamesMadisonUniversity
These two books explore issues of gender, but from very different perspectives.
Kessler and McKenna provide a theoretical approach to gender as a social con-
struction rather than a biological reality. They examine how and why we make
attributionsinto two separate genders. As they point out early in their book, we
generally consider genitals to be the ultimate criteriain making gender assign-
actions. However, this book deals with an importantquestion that underlies other
questions usually discussed in the context of gender issues. This book will be
difficult for lower-levelstudents, but should be read by advanced undergraduates,
graduate students, and those teaching and researchingin the area of gender.