Sayfa 1 / 3

Musa AKMAN

Kimden: "Özlem Özalp" <ozlem@uskon.com>

Kime: "Tuncay KAYA" <tkaya@uskon.com>; "Musa AKMAN" <musa@uskon.com>
Gönderme tarihi: 20 Temmuz 2010 Salı 11:53
Konu: Fw: Antequera - load combinations spanish code

----- Original Message -----

From: tecnico@lymingenierik.com
To: Hür ÖZYAR ; Özlem ÖZALP
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 3:18 PM
Subject: Fw: Antequera - load combinations spanish code

Sorry I made a mistake in earthquake combination loads. No wind needed.

----- Original Message -----
From: tecnico@lymingenierik.com
To: Özlem ÖZALP
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 12:14 PM
Subject: Re: Antequera - load combinations spanish code

s=snow
1.35 G
or 1.35 G + 1.50 S
or 1.35 G + 1.50 W
or 1.35 G + 1.50 S + 1.50*0.6W
or 1.35 G + 1.50 W + 1.50*0.7S
or 0.80 G + 1.50 W(wind upwards)
or 1.00 G + 1.0 E
or 1.35 G + 1.5 S + 1.5*0.6 W + 1.5*0.6 T
or 1.35 G + 1.5 W + 1.5*0.7 S + 1.5*0.6 T

----- Original Message -----

From: Özlem ÖZALP
To: tecnico@lymingenierik.com
Cc: Hür ÖZYAR
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 1:11 PM
Subject: Re: Antequera

¿Como esta Javier?

Yo soy Ozlem, la ingeniera de esa proyecto. Tengo unas preguntas:

Will we consider the vaulted roof as a plane roof for the wind coefficients?

I've examined the coefficients in Spanish code. My Spanish isn't enough to understand it. I saw
some values similar to the values of Eurocode in "Tabla 4.1" but when I saw the following
chapters and tables, all messed up. Can you give me an example?

Best regards,

Ozlem Ozalp

----- Original Message -----

From: Hür ÖZYAR
To: Özlem ÖZALP
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 12:56 PM
Subject: Fw: Antequera

----- Original Message -----

From: tecnico@lymingenierik.com
To: Hür ÖZYAR

02.08.2010
 Sayfa 2 / 3

Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 12:25 PM

Subject: Re: Antequera

1.- SNOW WITHOUT DRIFT

2.- FIND ENCLOSED DRAWING WITH RESTRAINTS. I HAVE MADE THIS PROPOSAL TO
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY. I WILL HAVE FINAL CONFIRMATION FROM THEM LATE TODAY.
3.-FIND ENCLOSED DRAWING OF SKYLIGHT- IT IS THE SAME WEIGHT.
4.- FIND ENCLOSED WIND COEFFICIENTS FOR BOTH STRUCTURES

ABOUT TODAYS EMAIL:

2.-WE MUST USE SPANISH CODE NOT EUROCODE. WE WILL USE EUROCODE ONLY FOR
BUCKLING COEFFICIENTS AS CALCULATION PROGRAM HAS NO OTHER POSSIBILITY ( OR HAS
IT?)
3.- I HAVE CHECKED THE LENGTHS I DON'T SEE THAT. IF YOU CAN PUT AN EXAMPLE? THE
DRAWING WITH RESTRAINTS HAS THE CORRECT GEOMETRY.

MAIN STRUCTURE MUST HAVE 4 WIND LOADS AND CANOPY 3 WIND LOADS (NOT IN THE WALL
SENSE)

----- Original Message -----

From: Hür ÖZYAR
To: tecnico@lymingenierik.com
Cc: Özlem ÖZALP
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 4:14 PM
Subject: Re: Antequera

Dear Javier,

Followings are the designer's questions:

1.Is 40 kg/sqm snow or live load?Shall we consider snow drift?
2.Is there any proposal for the support restraints?
3.There are some hatchings at around the ridge line?Are they skylight?Material weight differ or not?Is
there any difference in the levels?
4.The EUROCODE refers to three different load zone.(pls. ref. to attached copy).We did not receive the
wind co-efficients from you.Please advise.

Best regards

Hur Ozyar

----- Original Message -----

From: tecnico@lymingenierik.com
To: Hür ÖZYAR
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 3:26 PM
Subject: Antequera

Hello,

I have a doubt with combined load cases with earthquake load.

I will send combination of load cases tomorrow

Please give me email of person in charge if possible(if she knows english)

Main Structure

Load cases

02.08.2010
 Sayfa 3 / 3

H1: Self load

H2: Dead load 20 kg/m2
H3: Instalations 5 kg/m2+ 41 kg/m2 solar panels
H4: Cat walk ( 100 kg/ml)
H5: Snow 40 kg/m2
H6: wind +x (basic pressure 115 kg/m2) ( wind coeffs enclosed)
H7: wind –x
H8: wind +y
H9: wind –y
H10 : temperature 15ºC
H11: earthquake +x ( 15 kg/m2 horizontal)
H12: earthquake -x
H13: earthquake +y
H14: earthquake -y

__________ Información de NOD32, revisión 3661 (20081203) __________

Este mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus system

http://www.nod32.com

__________ Información de NOD32, revisión 3661 (20081203) __________

Este mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus system

http://www.nod32.com

02.08.2010