Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sage”
The statements in this report have not been evaluated by the FDA (U.S. Food & Drug
Administration).
The information provided by these sites and/or by this report is not a substitute
for a face-to-face consultation with your physician, and should not be construed as
medical advice of any sort. It is a list of resources for further self-research and
work with your physician.
We certify that at least one statement on the above-mentioned web sites and/or in
this report is wrong. By using any of this information, or reading it, you are
accepting responsibility for your own health and health decisions and expressly
release The Bulletproof Executive and its employees, partners, and vendors from
from any and all liability whatsoever, including that arising from negligence.
Do not run with scissors. Hot drinks may be hot and burn you.
2
Bulletproof Toolbox
Podcast #123, Peter Sage
Dave:
Today's
cool
fact
of
the
day,
is
that
a
recent
study
found
that
your
chances
of
remembering
something
is
far
greater
if
you
see
it
or
touch
it
versus
only
hear
it.
In
this
study,
research
participants
had
a
difficult
time
remembering
something
they
heard
only
4
to
8
seconds
after
hearing
it,
but
if
they
could
connect
the
sound
with
a
visual
or
tactile
kind
of
stimulation,
their
recall
increased.
Now
this
is
why
some
spiritual
traditions
request
that
when
people
study
their
texts,
the
people
move
back
and
forth
like
this.
It's
actually
because
you're
getting
the
nervous
system
activated
while
you're
studying,
so
it
sticks
in
your
brain
better.
Since
our
guest
today
is
so
fascinating
and
amazing,
you
might
actually
want
to
consider
watching
him
live
and
listening
to
this
episode.
Check
it
out
on
our
YouTube
channel.
Today's
guest
is
Peter
Sage.
He's
an
international
serial
entrepreneur,
a
world
class
speaker,
an
executive
coach,
who
wrote
his
book
at
18
years
old
about
physique.
He
wrote
Lessons
Learned
From
the
Recession
and
Five
Keys
to
Master
Your
Life.
Not
only
that,
he's
the
founder
of
Space
Energy,
which
is
a
multi-‐billion
dollar
project
to
generate
and
transmit
clean
energy
from
space,
a
competition
level
body
builder,
an
ultra-‐marathoner,
and
a
member
of
the
Dangerous
Sports
Club.
Basically,
this
is
a
guy
who
knows
how
to
kick
ass,
in
fact,
knows
how
to
teach
people
how
to
kick
because
he's
also
a
Tony
Robbin's
certified
trainer.
Peter Sage, I hope that introduction did you justice. Welcome to the show.
Peter:
Hi
Dave.
It's
always
interesting
to
hear
how
different
facts
of
your
life
can
be
presented
in
certain
combinations
that
make
you
sound
better
than
you
probably
are,
but
yeah,
thank
you
for
that.
Dave:
You're
so
welcome.
In
all
seriousness
though,
you
are
a
guy
who
has
a
track
record
of
outperforming
at
multiple
things
at
the
same
time,
which
is
one
the
reasons
that
I
reached
to
Brian
Rose
for
an
introduction
to
have
you
on
3
Bulletproof Toolbox
Podcast #123, Peter Sage
the
show.
What
do
you
do
every
day
to
perform
so
well?
I
mean
you're
one
of
the
upper
echelon
performers.
What's
your
trick?
Peter:
I
appreciate
that
question
actually.
There's
no
trick
to
it.
That's
one
of
the
challenges.
If
people
think
that
there's
a
trick,
and
they
don't
see
themselves
as
a
magician,
then
it
kind
of
puts
themselves
out
of
the
realm,
and
there's
this
separation
that
occurs
whereby
you
have
this
sort
of
guru-‐
itis
or
you
have
this,
"Well
it's
okay
for
you
because
..."
fill
in
the
blank,
but
not
for
me
because
I
don't
fill
in
that
blank.
One
of
the
first
things
I'd
invite
people,
either
looking
or
listening
to
this
to
understand,
is
the
fact
that
there's
nothing
special
about
me.
I'm
you
probably
out
of
the
chair,
and
maybe
I've
had
the
opportunity
to
do
a
few
things
or
had
a
few
levels
of
insights
that
some
people
may
not
yet
have
the
opportunity
to
have
access
to.
Hopefully
we
can
address
some
of
that
here
on
this
show.
There's
no
trick
to
what
I
do.
There's
no
magic
that
is
outside
of
the
scope
of
anybody
else
can
do.
We
all
have
natural
predispositions,
but
if
I
was
to
put
down
the
fact
that
or
highlight
some
of
the
attributes
that
have
allowed
me
the
illusion
of
being
a
magician,
I
would
have
to
put
it
down
to
self-‐
discipline
when
it
comes
to
taking
charge
of
my
inner
world.
As
a
result
of
that,
my
outer
world
appears
to
others
to
fall
into
place,
probably
a
little
more
than
theirs.
That
would
be
the
only
thing.
Now,
so
there
is
a
...
How
do
I
put
it?
There
is
a
discipline
required,
and
I
spend
most
of
my
time
in
the
morning
doing
my
morning
practice
whereby
I
stay
centered.
I
do
meditate.
I
do
read
positive,
inspirational
personal
developments,
self-‐improvement
texts.
I
do
visualize
what
it
is
that
I
want.
Nothing
that
anybody
else
that
has
the
same
basic
nervous
system,
biochemistry,
and
somewhat
probably
matching
limited
intelligence
that
I
have,
couldn't
do.
It's
consistency.
If
I'm
able
to
do
that
on
a
consistent
basis,
there's
no
magic
to
that.
It's
just
a
decision
to
be
able
to
do
it.
4
Bulletproof Toolbox
Podcast #123, Peter Sage
Dave:
Well,
there's
a
decision
to
do
it,
and
then
there's
the
selection
of
what
to
do,
which
is
a
big
problem.
There
are
guys
like
Tim
Ferriss
who
have
mastered
all
these
different
techniques
...
And
you
clearly
have
a
morning
routine
that's
helped
you
to
elevate
your
inner
world
so
that
your
outer
world
matches;
very
elegant
way
of
saying
that.
What
does
the
routine
look
like?
I
mean
do
you
wake
up
at
5am
and
go
for
a
run?
Do
you
wake
up
at
like
10am
and
have
a
latte
at
the
corner
Starbucks?
How
does
the
whole
thing
work,
right?
Peter:
I
know
how
those
two
choices
…
There’s
a
lot
of
people
that
would
like
it
to
be
the
second
one.
Dave: I know.
Peter:
Nature
operates
on
2
laws:
growth
and
con
[inaudible
00:05:09]
-‐bution,
and
so
growth
is
inherent
to
challenge.
The
unchallenged
remains
juvenile,
and
unfortunately
in
today's
world
of
instant
gratification
that
is
being
pushed
to
us
by
so
many
different
agendas,
commercial
and
otherwise,
it's
very
hard
for
people
to
get
onto
the
positive
side
of
the
habit
curve
when
it
comes
to
willingly
challenging
themselves.
Yes,
that
includes
getting
up
earlier
and
making
time,
not
that
you
can
manufacture
time,
but
utilizing
time
more
effectively
than
most
people
who
would
rather
stay
in
bed
because
they
went
to
bed
watching
movies
or
don’t
have
a
self-‐discipline
on
diet
that
supports
a
high
level
or
energy.
Now
saying
that,
some
people
are
naturally
more
morning
focus
people,
and
some
are
a
naturally
more
night
focused
people.
I
am
a
morning
guy,
so
for
me,
my
start
is
6am
at
the
latest.
I'm
usually
in
my
meditation
room
by
6am.
My
routine
is
that
I
will
review
my
morning
prayer,
my
goals.
I
will
sit
and
meditate.
I
will
visualize.
I
will
read,
and
then
I
will
likely
journal.
I
will
journal
for
anywhere
between
5
and
20
minutes
depending
on
any
insights
or
inspirations
that
came
through
for
me
to
self-‐reflect.
That's
it.
I'll
then
go
hit
the
gym
for
half
an
hour,
and
that's
my
morning
routine.
By
9am,
I've
invested
in
my
mind
and
my
body,
my
spirit,
and
I'm
ready
for
the
day.
That's
all
there
is
to
it.
5
Bulletproof Toolbox
Podcast #123, Peter Sage
Dave:
What
kind
of
meditation
do
you
do?
6am
is
kind
of
early.
A
lot
of
people
fall
asleep
when
they
try
and
do
meditation.
So
is
this
the
jumping
jack
meditation?
What
do
you
do?
Peter:
I
actually
have
a
rebounder
in
my
meditation
room,
would
you
believe?
I
tend
to
get
[inaudible
00:06:56]
for
...
I
have
my
goals
on
the
wall,
and
my
incantations
not
...
I'll
rebound
what
to
start
with.
That
kind
of
gets
the
blood
flowing
a
little
bit,
especially
if
you
do
have
a
little
bit
of
morning
mode
creeping
in.
For
me,
by
the
time
I'm
meditating,
I'm
sitting
down;
I'm
already
vibrating.
I'm
already
buzzing.
I'm
already
in
a
state
of
positive
energy
on
that
level.
For
meditation,
it
will
vary.
Predominantly,
it's
about
breathing
and
focus
and
being
presence.
I
don't
have
a
fancy
technique.
I've
spent
time
with
some
of
the
Zen
masters,
living
on
mountaintops
and
spending
time
with
people
that
do
that
for
20
years,
but
that's
not
my
deal,
where
as
long
I
can
quiet
my
mind.
If
my
mind
doesn't
want
to
be
quiet,
then
as
long
as
I
can
observe
my
mind
from
a
deeper
place,
of
witnessing
it
rather
than
getting
caught
up
in
the
merry-‐go-‐round
of
thoughts
that
most
people
try
and
control.
You're
not
going
to
control
your
mind.
As
long
as
you
can
disidentify
with
the
fact
that
you
are
not
your
thoughts,
it
allows
you
a
deeper
place
to
witness
them
from.
I
think
that's
the
challenge
with
most
people
that
try
and
meditate.
They're
trying
to
control
their
thoughts,
yet
your
mind
is
an
unruly
child.
For
most
people,
the
constant
stimulation
though
the
day,
especially
in
today's
multi-‐connective
social
media
world,
your
mind
is
constantly
being
trained
to
be
unruly.
For
you
to
then
think
that
in
20
minutes
a
morning
you're
going
to
master
that
is
like
trying
to
go
to
the
jungle
and
tame
a
lion.
You're
not
going
to
do
it.
It's
not
going
to
happen,
so
if
you
can
disidentify
and
come
to
the
place,
the
fact
that
I
am
not
my
thoughts.
My
thoughts
are
a
very
small
part
of
who
I
am.
If
my
conscious
is
a
fishbowl
full
of
water,
the
thoughts
are
the
fish.
If
I
can
come
at
it
from
understanding
that
I'm
more
than
that.
I'm
the
water.
The
fish
have
to
swim
through
that
from
time
to
time,
but
that
isn't
me.
I'm
6
Bulletproof Toolbox
Podcast #123, Peter Sage
deeper
than
that.
It's
easier
to
I
think
calm
yourself
and
not
caught
up
by
being
hooked
on
all
the
usual
stuff
that
hooks
the
mind.
Dave:
Now,
I
share
your
view
there
exactly,
"You
are
not
your
thoughts."
Yet,
there's
a
huge
number
...
There
are
huge
number
of
listeners
who
are
going
to
say
"But
wait,
I'm
a
rational
being.
It's
all
about
the
rationality
of
my
thought."
How
do
you
draw
the
line
between
sort
of
the
soft
world
of
meditation
where
"You
are
not
your
thoughts"
and
the
hard
world
which
is
"Well,
if
I
think
about
it,
A
leads
to
B,
B
leads
to
C,
therefore
A
leads
to
C,"
that
kind
of
rationalist
view
of
the
world
versus
something
where
"Ah,
the
thoughts
happened,
I
acknowledge
the
thoughts.
I
use
the
thoughts,
but
I
am
not
the
thoughts"?
A
lot
of
my
clients,
a
lot
of
the
people
who
read
my
blog,
struggle
with
that.
They
don't
want
to
be
too
airy-‐fairy,
and
they
don't
want
to
be
hard
ass
robots.
How
do
you
walk
that
line
down
the
middle?
Peter:
You
have
to
chunk
up
a
little
bit
to
a
high
level
of
awareness
and
open
up
to
the
fact
that
if
you
can't
come
to
a
place
where
you
recognize
that
there
is
a
physical
and
a
metaphysical,
you're
always
going
to
be
[stumped
00:10:03].
Yes,
we
know
that
there
is
metaphysical,
and
metaphysical
simply
means
outside
of
the
realm
of
the
5
physical
senses.
When
was
the
last
time
you
rationalized
being
in
love?
That's
not
something
that
operates
though
causality
and
Newtonian
physics.
If
you
walk
up
to
your
wife
to
be
and
go
through
a
checklist,
yeah,
I
don't
put
a
lot
of
hope
on
lasting
marriage
of
unconditional
love.
There's
the
part
of
us
that
makes
us
human.
There
is
a
spiritual
aspect
to
us
or
a
metaphysical
aspect
or
an
intangible
aspect
because
if
you
were
to
say
somebody
"Who
are
you?",
if
you
want
to
live
in
the
physical
world,
you
are
not
your
body.
I
know
that
because
you've
got
a
very
different
body
now
than
you
had
when
you
were
5
years
old.
You're
going
to
have
a
different
body
now
than
when
you're
80
years
old.
That's
non-‐negotiable,
but
it's
still
the
same
essence
of
you.
The
real
essence
of
you
has
to
be
non-‐physical.
It's
the
non-‐physical.
It's
your
sense
of
humor.
It's
your
personality,
your
charisma,
your
beliefs,
your
values,
your
dreams,
your
hopes,
your
wishes.
7
Bulletproof Toolbox
Podcast #123, Peter Sage
If
I
was
to
take
that
out
of
you
and
put
it
into
somebody
else,
then
it
would
be
you
in
a
different
body.
If
you
can
understand
that
"No.
Okay,
I'm
not
my
thoughts,
but
how
does
that
translate
day-‐to-‐day
when
I've
got
a
mortgage
to
pay?"
Well,
understand
the
possibility
to
be
open
to
that
fact
first
because
it
will
allow
you
a
different
perspective.
You
have
control,
limited
control
a
lot
of
the
time,
over
your
thoughts,
but
if
you
start
identifying
with
them,
you
fall
into
a
trap.
As
much
as
if
you
identify
yourself
with
your
body,
you
fall
into
a
trap.
You're
not
your
body.
Jesus
didn't
know
himself
as
his
body.
Muhammad
didn't
know
himself
as
his
body.
You
have
to
have
a
level
of
appreciation
by
chunking
up
to
a
higher
level
of
awareness.
Now,
if
that's
not
your
journey
right
now,
then
fair
enough.
Biological
maturity
is
not
something
we
get
to
vote
on.
Emotional
maturity
and
spiritual
maturity
is
a
choice.
For
some
people
that
get
too
caught
up
in
the
day-‐to-‐day,
maybe
about
right
now,
that's
not
their
time.
The
challenge
is
that
...
Or
the
paradox
is
the
more
you
tend
to
sit
with
a
level
of
personal
inquiry
of
that
level,
the
more
things
start
to
allow
the
mind
to
relax
because
it
will
start
to
see
things
that
operate
outside
of
causality,
and
when
it
has
amassed
enough
evidence
to
do
that,
it
tends
to
release
its
death
grip
on
circumstance.
Dave:
Amazingly
just
literate
and
well
worded,
well
phrased
description
of
that,
and
thank
you
for
sharing
that.
I
actually
haven't
found
a
very
good
way
to
try
and
explain
that
concept.
I've
make
a
part
of
my
own
practice
to
not
say
"I
have
a
cold."
It's
more
like
"My
body
has
this"
because
I'm
trying
to
just
build
into
my
view
of
the
world
that
as
you
know,
"I'm
not
my
body,
and
I'm
not
my
thoughts"
because
I
think
about
all
kinds
of
weird
stuff,
or
at
least
my
mind
does.
It's
like
"Whatever"
but
...
Dave:
Yeah.
I
don't
have
to
feel
guilty
about
that.
"Ah,
it
was
just
a
thought."
Like,
"Yeah,
maybe
I
would
like
to
do
that,
but
I'm
not
going
to,
so
I'm
just
going
to
set
that
aside,
that
thought
aside
right
now."
That
can
be
really
liberating,
but
when
you
switch
gears,
and
you
look
at
say,
what
an
entrepreneur
does,
and
you
look
at
what
they
do
in
business,
how
does
8
Bulletproof Toolbox
Podcast #123, Peter Sage
that
emotional
response
in
the
body,
even
that
metaphysical
side
of
things,
as
well
as
the
physical
side
of
things
come
into
play?
Your
emotions
can
be
the
boss.
Your
rational
thinking
can
be
the
boss,
but
when
you're
the
business
boss,
not
just
the
boss
of
your
own
biology,
how
do
you
lean
one
way
or
the
other
just
as
an
entrepreneur,
not
just
as
a
fully
functioning
human
being?
Peter:
For
me,
it
has
again
to
do
with
recognizing
the
....
The
physical
world
tends
to
have
its
basis
in
the
mind.
Your
thoughts
react
to
the
outside
world.
Your
logic,
your
reasoning,
your
associations,
your
conclusions,
inductions,
all
stem
from
the
mind;
all
of
which
is
busy
doing
whatever
it
does
when
a
business
decision
has
to
be
made,
when
a
functional
decision
has
to
be
made.
But,
we
have
a
thinking
center,
granted
and
it's
exceptionally
useful
if
we
tend
to
take
charge
of
it
more
of
the
time
rather
than
have
it
run
us,
but
we
also
have
a
feeling
center.
The
feeling
center
is
where
a
lot
of
people
tend
to
have
this
misnomer.
It's
not
the
airy-‐fairy
emotional
world
of
reacting
to
circumstances.
You
know,
"I'm
frustrated.
I'm
angry.
I'm
horny"
I'm
whatever
it
is.
There's
a
lot
of
emotions
and
biochemicals
that
interact
in
the
physical
body
and
that's
drive
the
thoughts
based
on
reaction
to
emotion.
There's
also
a
deeper
sense
of
self
that
comes
from
...
I
call
it
a
heart
level
of
intelligence.
We
now
understand
in
science
that
the
heart
has
its
own
brain,
40,000
neurons
as
a
minimum,
and
the
impetus
of
the
intelligence
of
the
decisions
that
the
heart
brain
makes
is
the
basis
for
what
the
head
brain
should
actually
listen
to
first.
Most
of
the
time
we
have
it
the
opposite
way
around.
We'll
make
a
logical
decision
and
then
try
to
rationalize
it
the
way
we
do,
or
we
try
and
justify
our
emotional
reaction
with
logic.
We
don't
go
deeper
than
that
and
say,
ultimately,
get
rid
of
the
emotional
reaction
caused
by
either
frustration
or
joy
or
reaction
to
whatever
biochemical
endorphins
or
serotonin
or
cortisone
reactions
going
on
in
my
body.
What's
beneath
that?
People
ask
me
about
leadership
...
Okay.
Very
quick
example.
There's
a
billion
books
on
leadership.
There's
a
thousand
different
courses.
There's
many
different
models
and
this
that
and
the
other.
Leadership
comes
down
to
one
predominant
principle:
Do
what's
right.
9
Bulletproof Toolbox
Podcast #123, Peter Sage
Dave: Yes.
Peter:
If
you're
willing
to
be
unpopular
in
the
moment
for
what
you
believe
to
be
right,
you've
got
the
genesis
of
true
leadership
right
there.
Now,
we
can
go
through
all
sorts
of
fancy
different
terms
and
stages
and
labels
and
translations,
but
ultimately,
you'll
get
more
out
of
becoming
a
personal
leader
by
doing
what's
right,
independent
of
the
good
opinion
of
others
and
the
need
for
approval
and
significance.
Yeah.
Not
what
you
feel
you
need
to
impose
on
somebody
else
to
prove
your
point,
that's
a
different
game.
That's
emotional
immaturity
trying
to
masquerade
through
a
level
of
ego
and
significance
and
being
a
bully.
Do
what's
right.
We
know
what's
right.
Underneath,
strip
everything
away,
listen
to
your
fricking
heart.
Understand
that
when
push
comes
to
shove,
and
you
reflect
after
the
fact,
you
knew
what
you
needed
to
do.
We
either
didn't
have
the
courage
to
make
that
decision
because
there
was
other
patterns
running,
or
we
justified
because
the
mind
was
in
charge.
Coming
back
to
your
original
question,
the
thinking
center
is
useful,
but
if
it
leads
to
show
...
You're
on
a
hamster
wheel
to
frustration
most
of
the
time.
If
your
reaction
is
geared
based
on
emotions,
then
you
never
have
a
sense
of
groundedness.
But
if
you
can
go
deeper
than
that
and
come
from
a
deeper
part
of
your
feeling
center
where,
call
it
your
soul
without
getting
too
esoteric,
call
it
[the
partly
0017:37]
essence
of
you.
Someone
...
Hawkins
would
call
it
"The
eye
of
the
eye,"
the
center
of
you.
Then,
you
have
a
very
different
level
of
presence.
You
realize
there's
no
better
tomorrows.
There's
no
worse
yesterdays.
There's
only
a
present
moment
where
you
can
make
an
intelligent
informed
and
congruent
decision
that
aligns
your
heart,
your
motions,
and
your
mind.
From
there,
you're
free
to
do
what
you
want.
Dave:
I
did
not
know
that
you
were
a
fan
of
Hawkins.
That's
awesome
and
very
esoteric.
One
of
the
things
that
I
struggle
with
when
I
work
with
clients
is
that
a
lot
of
the
concepts
that
you're
talking
about
are
ineffable,
and
that
there
aren't
really
great
words
to
describe
whatever
that
thing
is.
One
of
the
techniques
that
I
use
is,
I'm
a
certified
HeartMath
trainer
using
heart
rate
variability
training.
Is
that
something
that
you
use
as
well
in
your
own
10
Bulletproof Toolbox
Podcast #123, Peter Sage
practice
to
help
connect
with
that
part
of
you?
I
found
for
me
it
was
one
of
the
first
ways
I
got
...
Peter:
If
you
go
into
my
meditation
room
right
now,
alongside
the
incense,
you'll
find
a
HeartMath
sensor.
Dave:
There
you
go.
These
techniques
are
so
powerful
and
it's
surprising
how
many
people
will
say
"Yeah,
I
do
that,"
people
who
are
at
your
level
of
performance.
It's
in
my
mind,
it's
almost
like
cheating
because
I
can
meditate.
I've
been
to
Tibet
and
Nepal
and
Peru
and
all
that,
but
I
find
...
When
I
have
sensor,
sometimes
I
just
get
more
meditation
per
minute,
and
that's
also
a
variable.
It
would
be
very
luxurious
to
spend
8
hours
a
day
meditating
to
be
perfectly
aligned
with
that
little
ineffable
thing
that
we're
both
talking
about
there.
That's
one
of
the
things
I
use,
but
what
are
the
faster
ways
to
happiness
that
you
might
use
aside
from
HeartMath.
Are
there
things
that
make
you
happy
or
that
you’ve
found
make
people
who
work
for
you
or
with
you
happier
more
quickly
because
a
lot
of
people
just
aren't
happy?
Peter: Absolutely.
Peter:
Two
aspects.
One,
first
of
all,
one
of
the
things
I'll
do
to
start
with
this,
give
people
the
fastest
way
to
unhappiness
because
usually,
it's
normally
what
stops
people
from
being
happy
rather
than
allowing
them
to
be
happy,
if
you
know
what
I
mean.
One
of
the
fastest
ways
to
unhappiness
that
I
see
predominantly
as
the
major
obstacle
in
most
people's
level
of
fulfillment
is
trying
to
get
somebody
else
to
be,
do,
handle
behavior
in
a
way
that
you
want
them
to
actual
behave.
We
tend
to
forget
that
we
perceive
our
world
through
our
5
sense,
and
they
can
be
different
for
every
single
other
person.
We
all
have
5
senses
[bit
00:20:12]
processing
coming
information
into
the
body,
and
it
is
only
through
those
5
senses
that
we
can
perceive
the
physical
world.
11
Bulletproof Toolbox
Podcast #123, Peter Sage
Anybody
listening
or
watching
this
right
now,
whether
they're
using
sight
or
sound
or
feeling
the
air
conditioning
or
the
seat
that
they're
sitting
or
the
bus
they're
riding
on
or
whatever
it
is,
yet
everything
in
that
outer
world
is
coming
to
them
through
this
podcast,
is
being
filtered
first
through
one
of
those
5
senses.
The
obvious
question
to
ask
to
flag
up
or
to
remind
people
that
we
create
our
own
reality
moment
by
moment,
is
how
many
of
us
all
like
the
same
food?
We've
got
a
variable
instantly.
How
many
of
us
all
like
the
same
music?
How
of
us
have
the
same
favorite
color?
How
many
of
all
like
the
same
smell?
That's
why
so
many
different
levels
and
aftershave
...
We've
all
different
sense
of
what
we
like
to
smell.
From
that
sense,
you
come
to
a
conclusion,
an
unavoidable
and
inescapable
conclusion
that
2
people
could
be
standing
side-‐by-‐side,
inhabiting
pretty
much
the
same
space
in
the
same
moment
in
time,
experience
the
same
event
or
experience
in
the
outer
world,
use
the
same
equipment
to
process
that,
and
then
[inaudible
00:21:22]
the
5
senses
and
come
up
with
an
entirely
different
conclusion
as
to
what
that
means
or
what
that
experience
...
effect
is
for
them.
Now
the
clear
question
is:
Who's
right?
Most
of
that
time,
we
spend
justifying
why
our
interpretation
is
right,
and
unfortunately
most
people
have
to
get
buy-‐in
from
others
to
validate
why
their
sense
is
right,
by
getting
external
agreement;
the
more
people
agree
with
me,
the
more
I
feel
good
about
being
right
because
I'm
justified
because
obviously
I've
experienced
it.
Well,
wake
up!
No!
You
experienced
what's
right
for
you
and
somebody
else
could
experience
what's
right
for
them,
and
that's
besides
the
other
filters
that
are
going
on,
your
experience,
your
beliefs,
your
cultural
upbringing,
your
sense
of
values,
your
sense
of
...
Your
emotional
mood
at
the
time,
all
of
those
different
co-‐factors.
If
you
can
give
up
the
game
of
trying
to
have
other
people
act
in
a
way
that
fits
your
pictures,
you'll
start
avoiding
the
fastest
routes
to
unhappiness.
You
could
also
[throw
it
in
at
down
00:22:25]
at
a
higher
level:
reality.
Now,
I
gave
up
fighting
reality
quite
a
while
ago
for
one
simple
reason:
It
kept
winning.
To
allow
yourself
the
permission
to
let
go
of
a
lot
of
the
stuff
that's
12
Bulletproof Toolbox
Podcast #123, Peter Sage
out
there,
that
disagrees
with
what
you
think
reality
should
look
like,
is
another
way
to
get
off
that.
Now,
if
you
want
the
key
to
happiness,
there's
kind
of
a
complicated
way
and
an
uncomplicated
way.
The
complicated
way
is
what
most
people
vote
on.
That's
how
they
set
up
the
game.
The
complicated
way
to
happiness
is,
"When
I
get
..."
Yeah,
fill
in
the
blank,
the
right
relationship,
more
money,
a
better
car,
the
house
of
my
dreams,
the
girl
of
my
dr-‐,
whatever
it
is,
fill
in
the
blank.
When
the
outer
world
fits
the
picture
of
what
I
think
my
inner
world
is
saying
it
should
look
like
in
order
to
be
happy,
then
I
will
give
myself
permission
to
be
happy.
That's
very
complicated
and
unfortunately,
it's
a
house,
a
wheel
to
nowhere
for
most
people.
The
energy
field
of
desire
will
never
be
complete.
You'll
get
temporary
level
of
satisfaction,
but
desire
is
like
a
drug.
It's
not
a
state
that
you
conquer.
Desire
is
an
ongoing
process,
therefore,
whatever
you
desire,
you
think
you're
going
to
get
to
be
happy.
Once
you
get
it,
you
may
get
a
temporary
sense
of
achievement,
but
the
desire
is
an
energy
field;
it's
self-‐
perpetuating,
so
it
has
to
replace
itself
with
something
else,
but
that's
a
trap
most
people
don't
recognize.
That's
the
complicated
way,
and
I've
spent
many,
many
years
doing
that
and
somewhat
fruitlessly
chasing
my
tail
as
I
think
a
lot
of
people
appreciate.
The
simple
way
to
happiness
is
a
little
easier.
Think
happy
thoughts.
And
you
suddenly
come
to
the
mind-‐blowing
awareness
that
all
happiness
ever
can
be
is
a
real
time
present
condition
of
thinking
happy
thoughts.
Now,
if
you
set
up
again
to
say
that
you'll
only
allow
yourself
to
do
that
once
the
outer
world
fits
certain
pictures
that
aren't
currently
fulfilled,
then
good
luck,
keep
chasing.
But
all
you
ever
going
to
do
is
give
yourself
permission
to
do
what
you
can
give
yourself
permission
to
do
right
now.
If
you
want
to
be
happy,
or
if
you
look
back
in
your
past
and
the
times
you
were
happy,
I
guarantee
you
that's
all
that's
going
on.
You
are
thinking
happy
thoughts.
Dave:
On
the
flip
side,
it
is
easier
to
be
happy
when
your
basic
needs
are
met,
right?
13
Bulletproof Toolbox
Podcast #123, Peter Sage
Peter:
Most
people's
basic
needs
are
a
moving
target.
Most
people
don't
understand
what
their
basic
needs
are.
I
go
to
Guguletu
in
Cape
Town;
basic
needs
are
"Can
I
have
an
extra
spoon
of
rice?"
I
walk
down
the
street
and
listen
to
some
of
the
conversations
in
the
Dubai
Mall,
and
you'd
think
most
6
year
olds
basic
needs
are
"Can
I
have
an
extra
iPad?"
Dave:
You're
exactly
right.
One
of
the
happiest
groups
of
people
I
ever
say,
that
was
really
touching,
was
in
Cambodia,
not
more
than
a
decade
or
2
after
the
country
was
just
horribly
traumatized.
Very
poor
people,
a
dollar
a
day,
that's
the
average
income,
not
enough
food,
walking
around
happier
than
the
average
person
you
would
see
in
a
mall
anywhere
in
a
America.
Just
completely
amazing
because
they
were
thinking
happy
thoughts,
walking
around
singing
songs
and
...
There
was
suffering,
but
there
was
still
happiness
at
the
same
time
which
was
an
eye
opener
to
me
at
the
time.
It's
similar
to
what
you're
saying.
The
word
"Need"
there
may
be
is
part
of
the
problem
because
it's
not
actually
what
you
needed;
it's
what
you
thought
you
needed.
Peter:
As
human
beings
...
You
got
to
understand
that
we
don’t
get
to
vote
on
whether
we
are
going
to
be
programmed
or
not.
We
are
programmable
people.
We
don't
do
things
out
of
rational
thinking
most
of
the
times,
unfortunately.
We
do
quite
a
bit
out
of
passion,
but
most
of
what
we
do,
we
do
out
of
consistently
ingrained
habit,
and
those
habits
are
based
upon
programming,
majority
of
which
is
unconscious.
Now,
people
in
Cambodia
at
that
particular
time
didn't
really
have
access
to
30,000
commercial
messages
a
day,
programming
them
to
as
why
they're
unhappy
without
certain
products.
They
weren't
plugged
into
good
things
like
constant
negative
news
or
CNN
as
most
people
call
it.
They
weren't
exposed
to
a
level
or
outside
programming
that
they
feel
they
still
have
free
will
to
make
decisions
on,
which
is
the
furthest
thing
from
the
truth
because
whether
or
not
you're
going
to
be
programmed,
it
isn't
a
choice.
How
you
want
to
be
programmed
is
a
choice,
but
most
people
on
default
leave
that
completely
open
and
therefore
susceptible
to
the
agendas
of
others.
14
Bulletproof Toolbox
Podcast #123, Peter Sage
It's
like
sailing
on
an
ocean.
You
don't
get
to
control
the
wind.
You're
going
to
be
blown.
You're
going
to
be
blown.
How
you
utilize
that
based
upon
way
you
handled
your
sail,
you
do
get
to
choose.
But
if
you
sort
st-‐
[inaudible
00:27:30]
back
and
think
"Wow.
I'm
sailing.
I'm
just
going
[bibble
around
00:27:33]
you're
going
to
wake
up
next
morning
somewhere
off
course,
or
at
the
mercy
of
whatever
the
wind
is.
Now
the
challenge
to
their
society
is
that
the
wind
has
an
agenda.
The
media
has
agendas.
Commercial
bias
has
agendas.
They
spend
a
lot
of
money
and
hire
a
lot
of
smart
people
to
figure
out
how
you
can
be
unconsciously
programmed,
the
most
effective,
efficient,
and
clinical
way
possible
that
if
you
were
walking
around
without
a
specific
focus
or
intention
to
take
charge
of
your
own
programming,
I
guarantee
you,
you're
going
to
be
picked
up
and
put
on
a
fast
track
of
how
somebody
else
wants
that
to
happen.
That's
just
the
way
it
is.
Dave:
I've
used
a
lot
of
technology
as
well
as
meditation
to
become
aware
of
the
automated
responses
my
body
has
and
to
learn
how
to
reprogram
them
so
that
they
serve
me
much
better
than
serving
some
other
uses.
What
are
the
techniques
that
you
used
that
make
the
most
difference
for
becoming
aware
of
your
internal
messages,
including
the
ones
that
you
got
programmed
from
media
or
just
from
the
way
you
were
raised
becoming
aware
of
them,
and
then
changing
them
so
that
you
don't
have
to
go
through
that
rational
loop
of
recognizing,
thinking,
and
then
doing,
whereas
you
can
just
change
the
actual
response
in
the
first
place?
Do
you
have
a
way
to
do
that?
Peter:
Ask
other
questions.
Be
present
enough
to
ask
intelligent
and
smart
questions.
"What's
really
going
on
here?"
is
a
great
question.
"What
is
the
agenda
that's
happening
right
now?"
"What
does
this
really
mean?"
Because
most
people,
again,
are
walking
around
offering
themselves
to
be
emotionally
manipulated
and
have
no
clue.
Trust
me,
there's
a
lot
of
smart
people
out
there
right
now
that
get
hired
by
a
lot
of
corporations
that
pay
very
handsomely
to
figure
out
how
to
press
your
buttons.
If
you're
allowing
your
buttons
to
be
pressed
without
saying,
"Whoa,
hang
on
a
minute."
...
When
you
come
to
the
awareness
that
nobody
can
do
15
Bulletproof Toolbox
Podcast #123, Peter Sage
anything
to
you
emotionally
without
your
permission
you
start
to
understand
levels
of
freedom
of
thought
and
freedom
of
response.
The
challenge
is
most
people
don’t
like
responsibility
to
be
able
to
do
that
because
they
hold
responsibility
as
a
way
to
feel
good.
It's
kind
of
extra
burden.
“I
have
more
...
[enough
responsibility
at
work
00:29:47]
I
have
enough
responsibility
for
my
family,”
but
stop
and
have
a
look
at
the
word
for
a
second,
"Responsibility."
The
ability
to
respond.
If
you
want
to
take
responsibility
for
your
own
emotional
reactions,
if
you
want
to
take
responsibility
for
you
own
quality
of
life,
your
own
quality
of
experience,
it's
got
nothing
to
do
with
whether
you're
driving
the
car
you
want.
Everything
to
do
with
a
moment-‐by-‐moment
appreciation
of
the
fact
that
nobody
can
do
anything
to
you
emotional
without
your
permission.
When
you
start
taking
charge
of
your
response
and
your
reaction
rather
than
just
[run
off
a
pattern
00:30:27]
...
It's
kind
of
like
people
have
a
whole
series
of
movies
pre-‐recorded,
and
it's
like
being
a
human
jukebox
or
a
human
sort
of
movie
jukebox.
As
soon
as
somebody
says
or
does
or
anything
that
presses
a
certain
sequence
of
buttons,
you
go
into
a
part
of
the
brain
that
has
a
preset
response
on
a
preset
recorded
DVD.
It
goes
in
the
slot,
presses
play,
and
you
act
out
something
that
is
unconscious,
that
you
didn't
even
get
to
vote
on.
Now,
so
somebody
turns
around
and
says
"Hey.
You're
an
asshole."
And
you're
like
"How
dare
you
call
me
a
..."
whatever
it
is.
Yeah,
so
they
just
pressed
a
button,
and
you
went
to
the
pre-‐recorded...
Let's
say
if
somebody
does
this,
I
play
this
movie
and
this
is
what
happens.
Wake
up!
You're
better
than
that.
If
somebody
calls
you
that
...
And
how
about
compassion?
How
about
saying...
You're
driving
down
the
road
and
somebody
cuts
you
off
in
traffic,
classic
one.
Now
you
want
to
make
it
real?
Especially
on
the
roads
in
Dubai.
Yeah?
You're
driving
and
somebody
cuts
you
off.
Apart
from
the
fact
it's
predictable,
all
right,
you
know,
"Son
of
a
b
..."
You
start
reacting
off
a
pattern.
You
want
to
get
ahead
of
them,
or
you
want
to
give
them
a
piece
of
your
mind.
You
want
to
...
You
chase
them
down
the
road.
16
Bulletproof Toolbox
Podcast #123, Peter Sage
Now,
can
you
just
imagine
that,
and
you've
got
your
son
or
daughter
in
the
car,
what's
daddy
or
mummy
teaching
them
about
mastery
of
emotional
response?
No.
Nothing.
That
could
probably
lead
to
some
pretty
bad
scenarios
at
the
next
set
of
traffic
lights
if
that
got
out
of
control.
As
opposed
to
you
suddenly
see
this
guy,
who's
all
mean
looking
and
overtakes
you
and
cuts
you
off
and
you're
like,
"I'll
tell
you
what.
He
obviously
needs
the
road
more
than
I
do.
I'm
so
grateful
I'm
not
having
a
day
like
he's
had."
Dave:
Yeah,
and
probably
he's
got
someone
dying
in
the
backseat.
You
just
don't
know,
right?
Dave: Yeah.
Peter:
If
he
needs
the
road
so
much
that
he's
going
to
do
that
then,
yeah,
I'm
grateful
that
that's
not
me
sitting
in
the
car.
Dave:
That
was
one
of
the
more
difficult
things
I
ever
learned.
The
way
I
finally
did
that,
Peter,
was
with
the
HeartMath
sensor.
I
learned
to
drive
in
traffic
and
keep
the
light
green.
Every
time
someone
cuts
you
off,
it
will
turn
red.
It
took
me
2
weeks
of
doing
that
every
day
before
I
could
finally
keep
it
green
when
someone
cut
me
off
because
...
I
mean
it
just
makes
you
want
to
kill.
It
really
does.
That's
your
body,
your
fight
or
flight.
It
somehow
thinks
the
guy's
a
tiger
or
whatever
else,
but
to
reverse
that
programming
in
myself
took
a
long
time
because
I
used
to
be
kind
of
a
jerk
on
the
road,
and
I'm
glad
to
say
I'm
not
anymore.
Peter:
Well
done
on
being
an
example
there.
But
one
thing
I'd
invite
my
listeners
or
viewers
to
look
at
is
our
self-‐language,
our
self-‐vocalization
because
if
we
turn
around
and
say
"That
son
of
a
bitch
made
me
mad,"
guess
what?
Complete
untruth.
Absolutely
lie.
At
least
...
Even
if
you
can't
unhook
emotionally,
allow
yourself
the
gift
of
being
truthful
even
if
nobody
else
hears
it.
You
know
what
I'm
saying?
I
chose
to
make
myself
mad
based
upon
what
they
did.
Now,
it
doesn't
mean
say
you're
going
to
agree
with
17
Bulletproof Toolbox
Podcast #123, Peter Sage
them,
but
here's
another
level
of
mastery
that
would
allow
people
to
raise
their
level
consciousness.
When
I
look
at
behavior
in
others
that
I
would
let's
say,
disagree
with
or
falls
outside
of
my
values
or
at
best
would
illicit
a
negative
response
and
at
worst
would
drive
me
mad
and
whatever
it
is,
one
of
the
things
that
would
teach
people
very
quickly
how
to
raise
that
level
of
consciousness
to
a
point
where
they
can
become
self-‐masters
...
And
this
is
really
what
we're
talking
about.
It's
about
becoming
master
of
our
own
emotional
response
rather
than
allow
us
to
be
hooked
and
pulled
and
pushed
and
like
everybody
else
has
got
the
puppet
strings,
because
that's
not
a
life
that
[had
at
least
00:34:32]
any
level
of
fulfillment.
If
you
somebody
acting
out
of
accordance
with
how
you
feel
they
should
be
acting,
then
one
of
the
first
things
that
I
do
is
I
put
myself
in
their
shoes.
I
have
to
come
to
the
place
of
understanding
that
look,
people
do
things
for
reasons,
right?
Cased
closed.
That's
the
psychological
fact.
People
do
things
for
reasons.
Now,
they
may
not
be
your
reasons,
and
they
may
not
be
my
reasons,
but
I
know
they
do
things
for
reasons.
Unless
I
can
put
myself
in
somebody
else's
shoes
to
the
extent
that
I
can
understanding
that
if
I
was
them
with
their
history,
their
story,
their
current
emotional
frame
of
mind,
their
belief
system,
their
screwed
up
call
it
model
of
the
world,
whatever
label,
what
judgment
you
want
to
do,
whatever
it
is,
if
I
cannot
put
myself
in
their
shoes
and
fully
associate
to
the
fact
that
if
I
was
them,
I
would
also
hope
done
what
they
did,
then
I
have
no
right
to
judge.
Now,
it
doesn’t
mean
to
say
that
once
I
step
out
of
that
shoes,
I
don't
have
to
agree
with
them,
of
course.
But
unless
I
can
put
myself
in
their
shoes
and
[comes
00:35:43]
the
place
of
awareness
and
understandable
[authentically
00:35:46]
say
that
“Yeah.
I
would
do
that,
and
I
can
be
that
person
because
we've
all
been
idiots,
assholes,
impatient,
end
up
short
tempered,
bad
ass
son
of
bitch,
unloving,
unlovable
...”
There
isn't
a
word
in
the
English
language
that
can
describe
human
behavior
that
we've
not
encountered,
embodied
and
being
at
some
point
in
our
life.
Case
closed.
18
Bulletproof Toolbox
Podcast #123, Peter Sage
If
we
can't
come
to
the
awareness
...
If
I
can't
step
inside
that
person's
shoes
and
appreciate
why
they've
done
it,
it
doesn't
mean
say
I
need
to
agree
with
it
once
I
step
out
of
their
shoes,
if
I
can't
appreciate
the
fact
or
come
to
the
awareness
that
if
I
was
them
in
that
state
with
their
mindset,
their
history,
their
story,
"I
wouldn't
have
done
the
same
thing",
then
I
have
absolutely
no
right
to
impose
my
judgment
or
model
of
the
world
onto
that
person.
But
most
of
us
do.
We're
too
quick
to
click,
"Oh
look
at
that
idiot
doing
what
he's
doing."
Well,
guess
what?
You
were
that
idiot
at
one
point,
or
you
certainly
could
be.
So
unhook,
come
from
a
place
of
non-‐judgments
to
the
extent
that
...
It
doesn't
say
you're
trying
to
put
the
world
to
rights,
no.
You
got
no
right
to
put
the
world
to
rights.
Wake
up.
The
only
right
that
we
have
in
this
world
from
my
perspective
is
to
try
and
be
the
best
us
we
can
be.
If
you
...
I
have
this
bee
in
our
bonnet
about
"We've
got
to
fix
the
education
system.
We've
got
to
fix
the
economy.
The
government
sucks.
Blah,
blah,
blah,"
all
of
this,
and
we're
on
a
mission
to
try
and
fix
everybody
else
as
well,
then
I've
seen
that
lead
to
a
lot
of
frustration.
You
take
Nelson
Mandela.
Nelson
Mandela
didn't
build
schools.
Nelson
Mandela
didn't
go
and
fix
other
people's
problems.
He
didn't
try
and
address
what
was
on.
He
became
the
example
for
others
to
follow
by
being
the
best
him
he
could
be,
irrespective
of
his
past,
right
or
wrong,
and
he
had
level
of
27
years
of
time
to
mature
emotionally
to
lead
a
country
through
one
of
the
traumatic
and
difficult
times
that
could
have
so
descended
into
violence
like
that.
And
he
didn't,
but
he
didn't
do
it
by
running
around
trying
to
fix
everybody
else's
issues
and
telling
why
they
were
wrong,
no.
He
became
the
example.
As
a
result
of
that,
he
changed
millions
more
lives
than
anybody
building
schools
in
Africa.
Dave:
Yeah.
The
idea
that
"if
you
want
to
change
the
world,
change
yourself,"
it's
true
and
it's
so
hard
to
imagine.
To
choose
to
act
with
compassion
when
people
are
doing
things
that
make
the
world
a
worse
place
is
a
definitely
difficult
choice,
but
it's
one
that
you
see
people
make,
and
when
they
do,
they
create
really
big
change.
What
is-‐
19
Bulletproof Toolbox
Podcast #123, Peter Sage
Dave: Go ahead.
Peter:
It's
not
about
levels
of
understanding
because
insight
plays
very
little
part
of
that.
It's
all
about
levels
of
awareness.
For
example,
when
I
was
16,
as
I'm
sure
many
other
people
listening
here
that,
yeah,
can
probably
remember
that
far
back,
I
thought
I
got
the
world
pretty
sussed
out.
At
16,
we
got
our
stuff
together,
right?
Yeah.
We
know
how
everything
is.
Now,
when
we're
25,
and
we
look
back
at
the
16
year
old
us,
how
much
of
the
world
did
we
actually
really
had
sussed
out
at
16?
Right?
Nothing.
Right?
But
could
a
25
year
old
explain
to
a
16
year
old
what
the
world
is
like
at
25?
Well,
they
can
explain
it,
and
they
can
intellectually
probably
understand
some
of
it,
but
there's
no
way
they
can
experience
it
because
the
base
isn't
big
enough.
The
question
of
wanting
to
have
self-‐inquiry
to
the
point
of
maturing
emotionally
or
spiritually
is
about
recognizing
that
wherever
we
are
right
now,
our
base
isn't
big
enough
to
understand
what's
next
and
being
okay
with
that.
When
you're
40,
you
look
at
back
at
25
when
you
thought
you
really
had
the
world
sussed
and
realized
how
little
we
have
the
world
sussed.
At
25,
you
can't
experience
life
as
a
40
year
old,
not
because
you're
not
intelligent,
not
because
your
IQ,
or
you're
going
to
learn
some
new
technique
on
meditating
at
40,
no.
Your
base
isn't
big
enough.
To
turn
around
at
somebody
at
16
and
say,
"Look.
You
should
react
with
compassion
rather
than
making
an
obscene
gesture
through
the
window,"
you
can't
judge
somebody
for
that
because
we're
on
a
path,
and
that
path
unfolds.
Now,
the
path
that
unfolds
probably
fester
when
you
have
the
intention
to
move
forward,
but
nobody
was
born
enlightened.
Buddha
wasn't
born
enlightened.
It
was
a
journey,
a
progression,
and
that
is
the
journey
for
most
people.
At
41
years
old
now
myself,
I
know
the
...
Yes.
I
look
back
at
when
I
was
30
or
25
and
the
ego
driven
that
I
was
at
the
time,
and
I
see
how
much
of
the
world
that
I
didn't
know.
I
wouldn't
have
reacted
with
compassion.
You'd
call
me
an
asshole
and
I
would’ve
probably
head-‐butted
you.
Now
I
...
It
doesn't
mean
to
say
that
the
person
I
was
then
is
any
less
significant
or
20
Bulletproof Toolbox
Podcast #123, Peter Sage
worse
now;
it's
just
levels
of
awareness.
I
can't
go
back
and
tell
myself
that
because
I
wouldn't
understand
it
at
that
age.
For
people
that
have
had
the
humility
and
the
grace
to
have
allowed
themselves
to
progress
...
One
of
the
temptations
sometimes
is
to
judge
others
that
haven't
had
that
level
of
awareness
yet.
You
can't
do
that.
You
can
only
be
the
example
for
them
to
follow
and
unhook
from
the
whether
they
should
or
shouldn't.
Dave:
Not
a
lot
of
people
know
this,
but
Bulletproof
is
a
pretty
small
company
right
now,
but
3
of
my
key
employees
are
more
than
20
years
older
than
I
am
because
I
figured
they
must
have
a
bigger
base
than
I
do,
and
they
certainly
have
more
experience
than
I
do,
and
I
rely
heavily
on
their
advice
because
I
figure
whoever
I'm
going
to
be
when
I'm
50,
by
the
way
I'm
41
also,
about
to
turn
42
at
some
point
coming
up
here
...
It's
really
interesting
just
to
see
the
world
through
their
eyes
and
through
mine,
and
I
know
that
I
don’t
have
that
kind
of
experience,
and
I
think
that's
one
of
the
things
that
helped
me
to
do
what
I'm
doing
just
because
I
...
Recognizing
that
there
must
be
a
lot
more
I
don't
know
because
my
base
now
is
a
lot
better
than
like
you
said
at
25
or
16
because
I
was
definitely
a
jerk
back
then
...
I
work
on
being
much
less
of
one
these
days.
There's
something
that
comes
into
play
here
though,
and
that's
wealth.
You've
been
a
very
successful
serial
entrepreneur.
I
had
the
fortunate
and
unfortunate
lesson
of
making
6
million
dollars
and
then
losing
it
in
my
mid-‐
20s
which-‐
Dave:
That's
not
so
fun.
Company
went
bankrupt,
et
cetera,
et
cetera.
Most
people
only
hear
the
"Dave
made
6
million
dollars.
He's
a
rich
A-‐hole."
I'm
like
"It
didn't
quite
go
down
like
that.
I've
been
working
for
the
past
20
years
for
a
reason."
What
is
the
role
of
wealth
and
people's
emotional
and
spiritual
like
inner
awareness
and
their
connection
to
wealth?
What's
your
take
on
that?
21
Bulletproof Toolbox
Podcast #123, Peter Sage
Peter:
Great
question
and
one
that
is
probably
one
of
the
biggest
areas
that
prevents
people
from
climbing
through
levels
of
awareness;
is
they
get
[stuck
of
00:42:55]
money.
I
don't
know
how
much
longer
we
have,
but
...
From
my
side,
for
money
...
How
can
I
put
it
...
Once
you
understand
what
money
is,
a
higher
level
of
awareness,
you
can
stop
chasing
the
damn
thing
because
money
is
simply
and
always
will
be,
a
reflection
of
what
value
you
add.
Case
closed.
It's
an
arbitrary
medium
of
exchange.
Money
means
nothing.
If
the
economy
went
FUBAR
tomorrow,
and
we're
left
with
a
million
dollars,
and
it
was
cold,
you'd
burn
it
to
stay
warm.
Money
has
no
intrinsic
value
in
the
way
that
we
represent
it
right
now.
All
it
is,
is
a
byproduct
[or
00:43:35]
consequence
of
how
much
value
you
add.
Now,
the
reason
most
don't
like
that
awareness
is
because
if
you
don't
have
enough,
that
means
you
have
to
look
in
front
of
the
mirror
and
say
"Well
that
means
I
haven't
given
enough."
Most
people
sense
of
what
they
think
they're
giving
is
enough,
but
they
just
don't
feel
as
if
they
have
enough
money.
The
other
aspect
to
this
is
that
most
people
unfortunately
don’t
recognize
that
there
are
2
bank
accounts.
There
is
a
financial
bank
account,
which
everybody
focuses
on,
but
there's
an
emotional
bank
account.
Most
people's
emotional
bank
account,
unfortunately,
follows
their
financial
bank
account.
If
your
financial
bank
account
is
lower
than
what
you'd
like
it
to
be,
then
usually
your
emotional
bank
account
is
too
far
behind.
People
who
think
that
money
will
solve
all
of
their
problems
are
living
in
Disneyland.
The
challenge
with
that
prevalent
belief
system
for
most
people,
is
that
money
solves
problems,
is
because
those
that
don’t
have
access
to
a
lot
of
money,
most
of
their
immediate
problems,
[since
or
are
caused
00:44:39]
by
lack
of
money.
Therefore,
the
illusion
is
that
the
more
money
I
have,
then
the
less
problems
I'll
get.
Well,
that's
just
not
true.
You'll
have
bigger
problems
and
better
quality
problems,
but
that's
a
different
conversation.
You
ask
somebody
who's
worth
10,
20
million
dollars
if
problems
go
away,
and
they'll
laugh
at
you.
But,
if
you
have
the
situation
where
your
psychology
is
wired
that
your
financial
bank
account
follows
...
Your
emotional
bank
account
rather
follows
your
financial
bank
account,
you'll
22
Bulletproof Toolbox
Podcast #123, Peter Sage
always
be
poor
financially.
That
is
because,
what
we
weren't
taught
in
school,
is
that
the
financial
bank
account
is
a
lacking
indicator,
not
a
leading
indicator.
In
other
words,
if
we
want
a
financial
bank
account
to
go
up,
our
emotional
bank
account
has
to
go
up
first,
otherwise
we're
tied
into
a
negative
feedback
loop.
Now,
there's
a
time
delay
because
we
live
and
operate
in
a
paradigm,
what's
known
as
Newtonian
physics
and
causality,
which
means
that
the
circumstantial
reality
that
we
need
to
create
to
increase
money
doesn't
happen
instantaneously.
It
happens
instantaneously
in
the
metaphysical
world.
You
start
vibrating
at
the
level
of
positive
attraction;
you
start
appreciating
things.
You
start
getting
onto
a
level
of
raising
of
emotional
account
to
a
high
level,
the
financial
bank
account
has
to
follow,
but
it
doesn't
follow
at
3:00
on
Tuesday
when
we
want
it
to
because
in
the
metaphysical
world,
things
happen
instantaneously,
so
that,
what
Hawkins
would
call
an
attractive
pattern,
it's
already
set.
You
send
the
message
out,
but
people
don’t
give
it
long
enough
because
they
want
to
see
immediate
results,
or
they're
hooked
into
their
emotional
bank
account
gets
tied
back
to
their
financial
bank
account,
so
then
all
of
a
sudden
you're
back
on
the
negative
loop.
To
give
an
example,
if
you
are
in
a
dream,
if
you
want
something
to
happen,
it
happens
instantly.
You
want
to
fly,
you
fly.
In
the
metaphysical
world,
things
happen
straight
away.
It's
almost
like
a
little
boat,
a
remote
control
boat
on
a
pond.
You
turn
left
on
the
controller
and
voom,
voom,
instantly
turns
left,
but
in
the
physical
world,
the
time
it
takes
for
that
attractive
pattern
to
translate
into
circumstantial
reality
of
the
universe
to
rearrange
itself,
to
allow
that
financial
bank
account
to
follow
the
emotional
bank
account,
it's
like
an
oil
tanker
on
the
ocean.
You
turn
the
wheel
left
and
nothing
happens
to
2
kilometers.
You
have
to
give
it
time.
The
signal
has
been
set.
The
boat
has
to
turn,
but
if
halfway
after
a
kilometer
you
spin
the
wheel
back
and
say
"This
ship
doesn't
work"
and
I'm
sorry,
but
nobody
vote
on
the
fact
that
you
get
to
control
when
that
happens,
but
the
speed
that
the
boat
turns
at
is
totally
linked
to
the
congruency
and
the
alignment
between
your
thinking
center
23
Bulletproof Toolbox
Podcast #123, Peter Sage
and
your
feeling
center
and
the
consistency
of
that
frequency
that
you're
broadcasting.
Talk
about
money
...
Money's
a
reflection
of
the
value
you
add,
and
that
value
you
add
isn't
just
about
giving
40
hours
a
week,
an
employer
or
a
product
to
a
service
into
the
marketplace,
what
value
you
adding
to
the
world
that
you're
inhabiting.
We're
all
guests
on
this
planet,
but
if
you're
kicking
and
complaining
...
Here's
why
most
people's
financial
bank
accounts
stays
low.
Because
what
they
do
is
...
I'll
give
another
metaphor.
Imagine
walking
into
an
art
gallery
or
museum.
You
go
into
a
museum.
You've
been
invited
in
as
a
[sederal
guest
on
this
planet.
00:48:21]
You
walk
into
the
room,
and
the
exhibit
is
called
"Your
Wife."
You
walk
into
this
room,
and
you
look
around,
and
you
don't
actually
like
the
exhibit.
In
fact,
they're
disgusting.
They
don't
please
you.
Now,
you’ve
got
a
couple
of
different
things
you
do.
Here's
what
most
people
do.
Having
bought
the
ticket
and
walked
into
that
exhibit,
they
stop
stamping
their
feet,
shouting
and
demanding
the
curator
comes
and
changes
all
the
exhibits
around
to
something
they
like.
Now
if
you
did
that
in
the
museum,
what
would
actually
happen?
Peter: Security would come, and you'd be thrown out [of the museum. 00:48:57]
Dave: Yes.
Peter:
Right?
Would
you
have
any
chance
of
demanding
having
bought
your
ticket,
that
the
curator
comes
and
changes
that?
Is
anything
in
that
room
going
to
change?
Peter:
Not
at
all,
so
you
have
absolutely
no
right
to
complain
at
the
exhibits
in
the
room
called
"Your
Wife".
However,
you
have
every
right
to
choose
to
walk
into
a
different
room.
If
you're
bitching
and
complaining
about
the
exhibits
and
your
wife
right
now,
guess
what?
That
is
the
glue
that
keeps
you
tied
to
24
Bulletproof Toolbox
Podcast #123, Peter Sage
them.
Quit
that
because
it
will
keep
your
emotional
bank
account
at
zero
and
your
financial
bank
account
will
have
no
chance
to
change.
You
have
every
right
...
You've
got
some
...
If
I
recognized
that
my
financial
bank
account
is
simply
a
reflection
of
what
my
emotional
bank
account
has
been
doing
for
the
last
couple
of
months,
then
it's
no
wonder
most
of
it
is
in
the
shape
that
it's
in.
Hey!
That's
positive
confirmation
that
the
system
works.
I'm
going
to
make
a
commitment
to
go
out
and
walk
into
a
different
room
and
maintain
and
hold
that
course.
Nobody
can
come
back
to
me
in
2
months
that
authentically
does
that
and
tells
me
that
that
hasn't
shifted.
It
may
not
shift
exactly
how
they
want,
but
the
only
people
that
complain
are
there
ones
that
go
in
for
3
days,
see
that
it
hasn't
changed,
and
then
complain
about
it
and
spin
the
wheel
back
on
the
tanker.
Dave:
Peter,
the
part
about
your
emotional
bank
account
leading
your
financial
bank
account,
is
that
based
on
...
Is
that
something
you
invented,
or
is
that
based
on
some
particular
teaching
or
work
that
you've
come
across?
Because
it's
brilliant,
and
I've
never
heard
it
before.
What's
the
source
of
that?
Peter:
The
analogy
of
the
personal
financial
bank
account
is
something
that
I
overlay
because
I
think
people
can
understand
that.
Dave: It's really well said, and it makes great sense, so that's brilliant, thank you.
Peter:
I
appreciate
that,
thank
you.
I
mean
I
could
go
into
many
different
levels
of
tangible,
intangible,
physical,
metaphysical,
Newtonian
causality,
non-‐linear
dynamics,
but
most
people
get
the
analogy
of
financial
bank
account,
emotional
bank-‐,
It
just
makes
it
easy
for
those
that
aren't
in
the
[know-‐tery
00:50:56]
like
sometimes
we
are
learning
advanced
theoretical
physics
and
metaphysics.
To
be
fair,
when
you
get
through
[all
to
translating,
00:51:03]
that's
pretty
much
what's
going
on.
25
Bulletproof Toolbox
Podcast #123, Peter Sage
Dave:
It's
the
simplest
way
I've
ever
heard
it
explained,
and
it
jives
with
my
reality
a
hundred
percent.
I
want
to
be
very
respectful
of
your
time
but
we
have
one
more-‐
Peter:
Actually,
before
we
jump
off
the
subject
of
money,
I
just
wanted
to
throw
in
one
other
level
of
awareness
that
I
think
is
very
valuable
for
a
lot
of
people.
That
is
having
...
Obviously
having
work
with
Tony
for
the
last
probably,
I
don't
know,
14
or
so
years
now,
Tony
Robbins
...
I
was
actually
Tony's
youngest
ever
trainer
in
2002
which
I
was
very
proud
of
at
the
time.
Looking
back
right
now
I
realize
how
little
I
knew
as
a
trainer
back
then.
That
said,
again,
we're
all
on
our
own
journey.
One
thing
I
certainly
credit
and
attribute
Tony
for
raising
my
level
or
awareness
is
what
he
calls
the
"Primary
fear".
The
primary
fear
is
the
fear
that
we're
not
enough.
We're
born
with
2
natural
fears:
The
fear
of
falling
and
the
fear
of
loud
noises.
Everything
else
is
learned.
But
the
fear
that
we're
not
enough
is
usually
the
root
cause
of
most
of
the
issues
that
I'd
spend
a
lot
time
working
in
psychotherapeutic
intervention
around
the
world.
That's
usually
where
it
has
its
[genesis.
00:52:11]
The
fear
that
we're
not
enough,
not
good
enough
predominantly
for
a
lot
of
people,
not
rich
enough,
not
certain
enough,
not
loved
enough,
not
happy
enough,
not
tall
enough,
short
enough,
fill
in
the
blank.
We've
all
got
a
blank
to
fill
in
at
that
level
predominantly
unless
you
start
transcending
into
much
higher
levels
of
awareness.
For
the
fear
that
we're
not
enough,
let's
just
overlay
money
on
this.
One
of
the
major
challenges,
and
I
started
seeing
this
when
I
looked
into
the
issue
around
money
that
people
have,
and
the
psychology
that
prevents
them
from
raising
their
financial
and
their
emotional
bank
account.
That
is
that
...
Most
people
make
the
fundamental,
critical,
and
devastating
mistake
...
I
can't
understate
this.
Devastating
mistake,
that
they
combine
and
intertwine
their
self-‐worth
with
their
net-‐worth.
That
again
is
down
to
a
lot
26
Bulletproof Toolbox
Podcast #123, Peter Sage
of
the
conditionality
and
the
programming
that
21st
century
reality
has
put
on
most
people.
"You're
good
enough
if
..."
you
drive
the
right
car,
have
the
right
business
card,
the
right
job
description,
yeah
blah,
blah,
blah,
fill
in
the
blank.
If
you
have
your
self-‐worth
and
your
net-‐worth
tied,
most
of
the
time
if
your
net-‐worth
is
threatened,
it
triggers
the
fear
that
you
are
not
enough
because
your
self-‐worth
is
automatically
linked.
That's
one
of
the
reasons
why
I
see
most
people
compromise
their
values
around
money
faster
than
anything
else.
It's
not
because
they're
bad
people.
It's
just
that
their
association
to
their
self-‐worth
and
net-‐worth
is
so
strong
that
if
their
...
They
will
decisions
that
will
compromise
their
values
around
money
so
that
the
trigger,
the
fear
that
they're
not
enough,
is
not
set
off
because
most
people
would
do
almost
anything
to
avoid
that.
If
people
want
to
take
a
step
forward
in
creating
financial
abundance,
unhook
your
self-‐worth
from
your
self-‐worth
from
your
net-‐worth.
Understand
that
you
were
born
good,
nothing
...
You
don't
need
a
bank
account
to
prove
that.
Understand
that
regardless
of
what
happens,
you're
not
going
to
take
it
with
you.
You
don't
want
to
be
the
richest
man
in
the
graveyard.
The
only
people
that
try
to
take
wealth
with
them
were
the
Egyptians,
and
the
only
thing
that
happened
is
we
dug
it
up
and
stole
it.
That
doesn't
work.
That's
why
there's
a
big
difference
between
wealth
and
fulfillment.
Most
people
are
so
poor,
all
they
have
is
money.
If
you're
chasing
that,
and
most
people
do
to
validate
their
self-‐worth,
then
again,
you're
on
a
hamster
wheel
to
unfulfillment
that
unfortunately,
that's
a
tunnel
with
no
cheese.
Most
people
wake
up
at
the
end
and
...
It
begs
the
question,
what
is
the
grand
prize?
Is
it
a
fleet
of
Bentleys?
Because
here's
what
I
know,
I've
never
been
around
people,
and
I
have,
been
around
people
who
are
at
the
end
of
their
life;
people
that
have
finally
succumbed
to
the
realization
of
their
mortality
and
that
could
be
the
fact
that
they've
got
hours,
days,
or
weeks
to
live
and
have
actually
resigned
or
surrendered
to
that
level
of
awareness.
Every
single
one
of
those,
not
those
that
are
still
fighting
the
inevitable,
but
those
that
have
surrendered
to
that
level
of
awareness
and
have
a
little
27
Bulletproof Toolbox
Podcast #123, Peter Sage
more
level
of
serenity
around
that
rather
than
in
trepidation.
Obviously,
there's
always
fear
for
a
lot
of
people,
but
those
that
have
come
to
the
awareness
and
accepted
it,
not
one
person,
and
you
can
talk
to
nurses
in
hospices
that
spend
their
life
around
these
people,
not
one
person
have
I
ever
come
across
that
has
lied
there
and
said
"You
know
something?
Please
go
and
fetch
me
my
mahogany
framed
MBA
certificate.
Please
go
fetch
me
the
keys
to
my
Ferrari."
No.
What
do
they
say?
What
is
the
grand
prize?
The
grand
prize
is
"Please
go
and
fetch
me
the
people
that
I
care
about"
and
"I
wish
I
told
that
I
loved
more
than
I
did."
Or
"Please
go
fetch
me
the
people
I
love,
and
I
want
to
just
want
to
be
around
even
if
nothing
is
said,
I
can
just
be
with
them."
That's
the
grand
prize.
Most
people
avoid
that;
missed
again
completely
because
they're
so
busy
chasing
validation
that
they're
good
enough
because
they
need
a
financial
bank
account
to
prove
it
in
the
eyes
of
others.
You
were
born
good
enough.
Get
off
that
game.
Once
you're
free
of
that
game,
and
you
can
start
recognizing
that
true
fulfillments
comes
from
love,
joy
,
happiness,
thinking
happy
thought,
not
getting
caught
up
and
stressed
out
because
your
Wi-‐Fi
signal
isn't
strong
enough.
Not
getting
caught
up
because
McDonald's
ran
out
of
barbecue
sauce.
When
you
come
from
a
place
of
surrender
to
the
fact
that
what
is
the
grand
prize,
guess
what?
You're
then
free
to
go
and
make
money,
but
it
doesn't
have
a
hold
of
you.
The
paradox
is
you'll
probably
make
more
of
it
because
it
won't
mean
as
much.
Dave:
That
is
incredibly
deep
and
well
said.
It
makes
me
wonder.
You
get
some
pretty
heavy
criticism
from
your
latest
space
energy
project.
Criticism
triggers
those
things
right?
You're
managing
to
do
something
that
is
very
much
world
changing.
At
the
same
time,
how
do
you
handle
it
internally
when
you
get
the
critics.
We
can
all
see
what
you
say
to
the
critics,
and
that
you're
sticking
with
your
science,
but
how
do
you
handle
that
internally?
How
do
you
keep
them
from
taking
you
out
of
the
zone,
so
you
get
out
of
the
flow-‐state;
you
get
basically
bummed
because
they
are
saying
effectively
you
are
not
good
enough,
as
a
part
of
the
criticism?
You've
never
been
called
a
crazy
person
have
you,
Peter?
28
Bulletproof Toolbox
Podcast #123, Peter Sage
Dave:
Exactly.
Tell
me
what
goes
on
inside
your
mind
or
inside
your
heart
when
some
says
"Oh
my
God,
I
have
a
PhD
from
X,
Y,
and
Z,
and
Peter
is
a
nutter,
and
it's
never
going
to
work,
and
it's
going
to
kill
the
planet"
whatever
the
worst
things
that
they
say.
What
does
that
do
to
you,
and
do
you
turn
that
around?
Peter:
Here's
a
lesson
in
psychology
that
I
think
would
offer
some
value
and
benefit
to
many
of
the
[inaudible
00:58:48]
[abuse.
00:58:48]
People
say
to
me,
"What
is
one
of
the
biggest
gifts
you
can
give
to
children?"
I
would
say
that
the
first
thing
is
understand
the
difference
between
being
internally
and
externally
validated.
If
you
want
externally
validated,
it's
kind
of
what
I
was
saying
earlier,
you
will
need
other
people
to
agree
with
your
model
of
the
world
in
order
to
feel
good
about
it.
The
second
somebody
disagrees
with
that,
you
are
on
a
defensive
path
to
try
and
revalidate
your
model
of
the
world
to
them.
That's
an
exhausting
game.
I've
already
said,
you
want
the
key
to
unhappiness,
try
and
get
somebody
else
to
agree
with
what
it
is
you
want
them
to
agree
with.
That's
a
fool's
game.
That's
Disneyland
thinking.
That's
never
going
to
happen.
7
billion
people
on
the
planet,
and
7
different
ways
of
looking
at
it
...
7
billion
different
ways
of
looking
at
it.
It's
like
...
No
one
would
get
anyone
with
that.
If
I
hear
somebody
else's
[poignant
00:59:44]
point
of
view,
then
...
don't
get
me
wrong,
I'm
not
myopically
glued
to
something
because
it's
my
idea
and
therefore
it's
right.
No.
If
somebody
presents
a
level
of
insight
that
I
think
is
valid,
that
is
[an
area
of
00:59:56]
[inaudible
00:59:56]
time-‐-‐I'm
not
the
smartest
guy
in
the
world,
far,
far,
far
from
it.-‐-‐then,
and
I
think
it's
valid,
I'll
of
course
I'll
have
a
look
at
that.
But
for
somebody
to
say
that
my
model
of
the
world
challenges
theirs
and
therefore
mine
is
wrong
...
I
mean
if
you
hear
it
from
that
perspective,
you
see
the
lunacy
of
it
right?
I'm
very
and
exceptionally
internally
validated.
I
don’t
need
6,999,999,999
other
people
to
agree
with
me
at
any
level
for
me
to
feel
good
about
what
it
is
I
want
to
feel
good
about.
Why
would
I?
If
29
Bulletproof Toolbox
Podcast #123, Peter Sage
I'm
not
hurting
anybody
else,
and
as
long
as
nobody
is
less
than
because
they
crossed
my
path,
why
would
I
subject
myself
to
the
good
opinion
of
others,
when
I
know
that's
a
game
no
one
can
ever
win?
Now,
I
don't
swim
in
GOOP.
G-‐O-‐O-‐P,
good
opinion
of
other
people.
Most
people
spend
their
lives
swimming
in
GOOP
because
they're
externally
validating.
You
want
to
give
a
gift
to
your
kid,
get
them
to
be
internally
validated,
not
to
the
point
where
they're
arrogant.
Arrogance
is
the
same
pattern,
just
the
flip
side
of
the
coin.
"I'm
indifferent
to
your
stupid
model
of
the
world
because
mine
is
better."
I'm
almost
validating
mine
by
proving
yours
is
wrong.
It's
the
same
deal.
There's
no
humility
in
that.
If
someone's
got
a
PhD,
then
for
a
start
I
already
that
they'd
been
programmed
to
be
a
mismatcher.
Their
entire
thesis
is
based
upon
proving
something
that
hasn't
been
proved
yet.
They're
conditioned
to
it.
It's
predictable.
I
remember
when
I
was
22,
I
said,
"You
know
what
I
get?
As
many
hate
websites
as
Bill
Gates.
I
know
I'll
be
doing
well."
It's
just
perspective.
If
you
are
internally
validated,
not
opinionated,
not
egotistical,
again
like
I
said,
that's
just
the
flip
side
of
the
coin
to
being
externally
validated;
that's
a
case
of
not
giving
a
crap.
Of
course
I
care
about
other
people's
...
If
there's
something
valid
there,
then
I'll
assess
it
on
my
own
terms,
and
if
it's
valid,
I'll
thank
them
for
their
perspective.
But
for
someone
to
come
out
of
left
field
and
try
to
justify
...
I
see
the
pattern
they're
wanting.
It's
the
pattern
I've
just
explained.
If
it
contradicts
them,
their
model
of
the
world,
and
they're
externally
validated,
they
have
to
contradict
where
I
am
and
try
and
get
me
...
Try
and
attack
mine
and
anyone
else's
point
of
view.
It's
how
they
get
their
validation.
It's
how
they
get
their
significance.
Dave: It's because they feel not good enough like you were saying earlier.
Peter:
It's
always
there.
It's
always
there.
I
can
think
of
almost,
to
be
fair,
amusement
rather
than
anger.
That's
not
looking
down
on
them.
That's
looking
at
the
pattern,
not
them.
I
make
the
distinction
between
somebody
30
Bulletproof Toolbox
Podcast #123, Peter Sage
and
somebody's
behavior.
That's
an
important
distinction
to
make;
that
only
usually
comes
through
a
higher
level
of
awareness.
Certainly,
you
can
come
in
anywhere
lower
levels
of
awareness.
I
can
you
tell
you
that.
I'm
very
fortunate
and
blessed
that
having
had
the
level
of
discipline
and
self-‐inquiry
on
the
journey
that
[I’ve
gone,
and
I’m
only
01:02:57]
a
couple
of
steps
ahead
of
people
that
haven't
taken
that
based
on-‐experience
that,
again,
I
said
earlier,
some
people
haven't
had
the
fortune
to
have
access
to
the
level
of
insights
I
have.
It's
not
some
clever
or
special…
Yeah.
Am
I
going
to
get
attacked?
I
hope
so.
Does
it
contradict
everybody
else's
model
of
the
world?
Well,
it
wouldn't
be
doing
much
good
if
it
didn't.
Peter: You're not going to save world thinking whatever everybody else thinks.
Dave:
That's
awesome.
Well,
this
is
the
only
interview
I've
had
so
far,
Peter,
where
I
feel
like
the
interview
is
already
maybe
answered
the
final
question,
but
I'm
going
to
ask
the
final
question
so
you
can
just
wrap
it
up
succinctly.
This
is
something
I've
asked
all
hundred
and
about
twenty
people
I've
interviewed
over
the
past
few
years.
Given
your
entire
life
experience,
your
top
3
recommendations
for
people
who
want
to
perform
better
at
whatever
it
is
they're
here
to
do,
just
most
3
important
nuggets.
Peter:
Everybody
always
wants
the
top
this,
the
top
that,
the
golden
this,
the
golden...
31
Bulletproof Toolbox
Podcast #123, Peter Sage
One
of
the
first
things
I
would
suggest
is
give
up
the
need
to
look
for
the
top
3.
But
inherent
in
that
is
to
learn
to
live
in
the
space
of
a
question.
Most
people's
minds
are
so
conditioned
to
absolutes,
and
part
of
the
reason
for
that
is
historically
we're
programmed
to
have
a
thirst
for
answers.
Now,
we
grew
up
outside
of
the
sciences
as
a
species,
in
a
way
that
for
generations
and
tens
of
thousands
of
years,
we
were
intrigued
by
natural
phenomena.
When
it
rained,
we
wondered
why.
Where
did
the
ocean
go
every
night?
Why
did
it
come
back?
Why
did
the
moon
change
shape?
We
have
an
intrinsic,
built
into
our
DNA
thirst
for
absolute
answers.
The
flip
side
to
that
on
a
positive,
it
makes
known
the
consummate
explorer
to
reach
out
beyond
that
comfortable
grasp
and
create
magic
that
no
other
species
or
no
other
part
of
history
man
has
had
the
ability
to
do.
The
other
side
to
that
is
that
the
mind
wants,
"Give
me
the
top
3."
If
you
are
able
to
...
If
I
was
to
put
the
top
1,
having
contradicted
what
I've
just
said,
I
would
say
one
of
the
most
powerful
things
that
somebody
can
do
is
to
increase
their
ability
to
handle
uncertainty.
Peter:
Inherent
in
that,
is
learn
to
live
in
the
space
of
a
question.
The
second
thing
I
would
encourage
people
to
look
at
is
to
recognize
that
we
all
come
at
life
through
a
different
looking
glasses.
You
create
your
model
of
the
world;
I
create
my
model
of
the
world.
It's
going
to
be
different
for
you
because
you
have
a
different
way
of
interpreting
through
the
5
senses,
on
top
of
a
different
belief
system,
a
different
upbringing,
a
different
cultural
paradigm,
and,
and,
and,
and.
Therefore,
if
you
agree
with
me,
then
there's
something
wrong.
It's
like
the
...
If
2
people
in
business
always
agree,
one
of
them
is
unnecessary.
Learn
to
understand
that
we
all
have
a
different
viewpoint
and
be
okay
with
that.
I
don't
need
you
to
agree
with
me
to
me
feel
good
about
agreeing
with
myself.
Make
a
distinction
there
because
if
you
can
do
that,
everything
shifts.
The
third
one,
if
I
was
to
sum
that
up
...
Let
me
have
a
think.
...
Again,
don't
get
hooked
by
your
immediate
circumstances.
If
you're
bitching
and
32
Bulletproof Toolbox
Podcast #123, Peter Sage
complaining
about
the
artifacts
in
the
room,
in
the
museum
right
now,
you're
either
going
to
get
thrown
out,
or
you're
going
to
be
more
annoyed
that
you're
never
going
to
change
them.
Make
a
conscious
choice
to
walk
into
a
different
room.
Choose
a
different
vector.
You
know
something?
I
can
either
complain
about
my
circumstances,
or
I
can
choose
the
ones
that
I
want.
Get
inspired.
Tap
into
the
...
Make
sense
of
who
you
are
that
was
born
a
miracle.
400
million
to
1
and
you
show
up.
That
was
no
accident.
You
chose
to
be
here
for
a
better
reason
than
working
9
to
5
in
a
job
you
don't
like
for
somebody
you'd
never
probably
understood
for
a
wage
that
is
less
than
what
you're
worth,
to
retire
at
65
on
something
that
you've
thought
might
be
happiness
to
find
out
it
isn't.
Give
it
up.
Follow
your
passion.
Follow
your
bliss
and
don't
let
anybody
tell
you
that
you
can't
do
it.
Dave:
Peter,
amazing
interview.
Thank
you
for
taking
the
time
to
be
on
Bulletproof
Executive
Radio.
Where
should
people
go
to
learn
more
about
what
you're
doing,
your
books,
give
me
your
URL,
Twitter,
wherever
else
you
would
like
people
to
know
more
about
what
you're
doing?
It's
hard
to
hide
a
public
profile
these
days,
so
if
you
Google
"Peter
Sage",
I'm
pretty
much
everywhere
for
the
right
or
wrong
reason
I'm
sure,
depending
on
if
you’ve
got
a
PhD
or
not.
Twitter,
PeterSage007.
Please
don't
tweet
away
or
retweet
this
or
...
My
passion
here
is
to
get
the
message
out
that
can
hopefully
raise
...
Even
if
it's
one
thing
people
can
take
out
of
this
interview
that
they
can
make
a
difference
with.
Knowing
and
not
doing
is
the
same
as
not
knowing.
Most
people
are
well
read
and
know
nothing,
or
they're
inspired
in
the
moment,
but
then
get
caught
up
in
trying
to
do
too
much.
The
reason
is
that
the
emotional
root
is
usually
overwhelmed;
leads
to
confusion
which
leads
to
inaction,
which
means
they’ve
learned
so
much,
they
do
nothing.
Take
one
thing
out
of
this
interview
and
go
and
help
somebody
else
with
it.
Go
be
the
example.
Go
share
it.
If
you
want
access
to
more
of
my
work,
then
I'm
obviously
on
YouTube.
PeterSage.com
is
my
main
resource.
It's
33
Bulletproof Toolbox
Podcast #123, Peter Sage
been
a
pleasure
to
spend
this
time
with
you
and
have
this
chat
and
hopefully,
add
some
value
to
some
people
that
are
watching
or
listening.
Featured
PeterSage.com
@petersage007
Space Energy
Resources
Bulletproof
HeartMath EmWave 2
34