Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Symposium: A Quarterly
Journal in Modern Literatures
Publication details, including instructions for
authors and subscription information:
http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/vsym20
To cite this article: C. G. Christofides (1960) Four Recent Camus Studies: The
Thought and Art of Albert Camus: Camus: Albert Camus and the Literature of
Revolt, Symposium: A Quarterly Journal in Modern Literatures, 14:1, 60-64, DOI:
10.1080/00397709.1960.10732625
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the
information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform.
However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no
representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness,
or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views
expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and
are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the
Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with
primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any
losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages,
and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or
indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the
Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes.
Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan,
sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is
expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at
http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
Downloaded by [University of Toronto Libraries] at 17:19 02 February 2015
REVIEWS
PHILIP THODY: Albert Camus: A Study of his Work. New York, Grove
Press, 1957- 155 pp.
THOMAS HANNA: The Thought and Art of Albert Camus. Chicago, Henry
Downloaded by [University of Toronto Libraries] at 17:19 02 February 2015
NEVER DID Cain kill Abel more methodically and more dispassionately than
in the twentieth century. Never did the estrangement of man from man
receive less understanding from religion or scientisrn than in the generation
which triumphantly crossed the infinite spaces, while man was dooming
two per cent of his brothers on earth to wander in search of a home, only
to find shelter instead. No voice in the West has been more sincere, has
achieved greater artistic range, in stating this plight than the voice of Albert
Camus. Son of the land between the Algerian shore and the Sahara moun-
tains, like Socrates of the Saronic gulf and the hills of Attica, and Moses,
child of the Nile and the Memphis elevations, Camus' conscience reasserts
the humanist values of the Greeks and seeks a nee-decalogue in order to
reconcile the oscillation of the man of his times between nihilism, irration-
ality, and injustice on the one hand and the aspiration to peace, darity,
and perfect justice on the other. The state of the absurd, in the face of
bankrupt Christianity and bankrupt rationalism, must necessarily lead to
revolt in order to lead to self-awareness and possibly beatitude.
Four major critical works on Camus in English appeared between 1957
and 1959, all of them by eminent scholars pursuing divergent lines of
investigation. These works, added to the staggering heap of articles, are
a testimony of the impact on this generation of an artist who in his lifetime
was appreciated as much for his decency as a human being as he was for
his creative output: eloquent manifestation and castigation of the climate
of the age.
Philip Thody's Albert Camus does not suffer from the disadvantage of
having been written first, in spite of only a last-minute mention of L' Exil
et Ie rrryaume. Rachel Bespaloff's judgment on Camus' work up to 1950 will
stand forever: co••• few pages, few words, but, in these few, modern man
and his torment, his sin and his grandeur." L'Etranger and La Peste are
indeed a sufficient creation to assure Camus the immortality that Mallarrne
achieved with some thirty lines. Philip Thody, Lecturer in French at the
60
REVIEWS 61
Queen's University of Belfast, as well as John Cruickshank, Professor of
French at the University of Southampton, succumbs to the Britisher's
propensity for political and philosophical analysis, at the expense of the
aesthetic approach, in relation to the work of a writer, who, when accepting
the Nobel Prize said: "I cannot live as a person without my art," and who
approved entirely of Gide's position on literary creation. Had Camus laid
claim to political and philosophical authority after the publication of Le
My/he de Sisyphe or L'Homme revol/e, then such an examination, which
accounts for a large section of Mr. Thody's book and about three-fourths
of Mr. Cruickshank's study, might have been justifiable. It is puzzling that
most critics of Camus fail to correlate the dates of composition of the
creative works with those of the theoretical writings. The latter, which
Downloaded by [University of Toronto Libraries] at 17:19 02 February 2015
always come after (as if Camus were seeking to justify or explain his
creations), must be considered unsystematic exercises of a sensibility that
may lack rigor but one that contains much honesty and humility. Malraux,
intelligent artist that he is, conserves his distance by not providing theoretical
sequels to Les Conquerants or La Condition humaine.
Mr. Thody is irked by the lopsided character of L'Homme revoltt, in which
the only revolutions that count are the French Revolution and the Marxist
one; he is irked by Camus' passing over the successful bourgeois revolutions
in England and America and his neglect of non-nihilist but rebellious
writers such as Voltaire, Zola, Ibsen, Shaw, or Malraux, writers who avoided
the nihilism which masquerades as revolt. A more perceptive and wise
critic, Professor Cruickshank, sees in Camus' commentary on revolt not so
much the doctrinaire choice of one axis of history as the statement of a
moral dilemma, once revolt takes on, in the name of justice, the inhuman
character of political revolution. According to Camus, this antinomy may
be resolved by the "philosophie des limites" of pre-Christian revolt. Both
authors restate Camus' explanation of the Nietzschean realization that God
is dead and Dostoievsky's, "If God does not exist, then everything is
permitted," in terms of the trial of Christianity in the eighteenth century
and the banishment of the miracle. A valid question to raise would have
been Camus' not receding to the Reformation when secular government
allied to the divine-right theory began preparing the modern totalitarian
state, a period that witnessed regicides in France and England within thirty-
nine years-after Luther and Calvin had measurably weakened in Europe
the control which the Church had once exercised over medieval princes
(Canossa).
Mr. Thody's interpretation of L'Etranger in the light of Le My the de
Sisyphe is stimulating (his notes are excellent), and could serve to rebuff
the argument of Claude Mauriac that the didactic end does not fit in with
the rest of the book. His cursory summation of Camus' works, however,
and his even more cursory critical analysis, the almost total absence of
considerations of language and art (and his annoying use of the British
translation title for L'Etranger [The Outsider]), make of his work a sketchy
outline that is often witty, which has the appearances but not the virtues
of compactness.
Mr. Cruickshank's seventy-seven pages on "The Art of the Novel" and
6z Spring I960 SYMPOSIUM
Far from the sardonic critic's, "St. Camus, pray for us I" (the Camus of
American innocents and ladies' literary clubs), Professor Bree's Camus is
the artist committed to the task of expressing universal problems, all the
values that matter, freedom and justice and joy and sorrow, with images
of deliverance: the life-giving sea as it confronts the mystery of the blinding
sun of life. The rest, death, his death, is absurdity.