Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cosmopolitanism
http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452218557.n99
Cosmopolitanism is, on the one hand, a collective term used to denote various forms
of global thought developed in the history of philosophy since Greek antiquity and, on
the other hand, a concept that has emerged in recent debates on moral responses to
(economic) globalization. Both notions are nondoctrinal, as there is no specific school or
center of cosmopolitanism. The term sometimes represents notions of a sophisticated
globalized privileged consumerist lifestyle. In a more pejorative sense, cosmopolitanism
also refers to selfish moral indifference, a lack of affection for a specific place or culture,
and a compassionless attitude of belonging nowhere. Hence, cosmopolitanism can both
refer to ideas of extreme individualism and to collective and global consciousness.
potential universal applicability of norms and concepts developed within Europe remains
heavily debated in the contemporary discourse (mainly in postcolonialism and critique of
modernity).
Samuel Pufendorf identified the need for international law, regulating mutual relations
between single states. But this tiny common bond between states was based only on
the similarity of autonomy and its reciprocal recognition, not on a shared joint system of
values.
Unlike such concepts and ideas, counterconcepts evolved during the age of
Enlightenment, all containing the basic ingredient similarity, or egalité. In particular,
Freemasonry, which spread from 1717 to Europe and the world, embraced ideas of
similarity and global community without initially referring to the term cosmopolitanism.
In 1736, Fellow of the Royal Society André Michel de Ramsay (1686–1743) outlined
these ideas in a famous lodge oration in Paris where he claimed that the entire world
was a great republic, every nation a family, and each individual a child, a definition
very close to the one offered in the later French Encyclopédie (1751–1772). Adding to
ideas of mutual affinity and harmony, Ramsay outlined an encyclopedic vision where
knowledge was shared universally. Invoking the idea that Freemasons were dispersed
across the surface of the globe, cultural practices emerged within the craft that allowed
members of Masonic lodges to live out cosmopolitan ideas. Although Freemasonry
in essence was not an international organization, passports for the purpose of travel
were issued, and printed directories of lodges worldwide facilitated global contacts with
local nodes. The idea of global brotherhood was constantly hailed in Masonic poems,
songs, and orations throughout the century and later reiterated in romantic concepts of
fraternal cosmopolitanism. In 1785, an article appeared in a Masonic journal in Vienna,
arguing for the adoption of cosmopolitanism as a moral duty for every Freemason.
Apart from universal love and benevolence, the article called for eclecticism in the quest
for truth and attacked sectionalism and sectarianism alike. Three years later, German
author Christoph Martin Wieland (1733–1813) published a lengthy article in which he
claimed that cosmopolitanism was a universal and inherent value, potentially to be
discovered within every human being. All humans, all rational beings, were members of
the same family. Everybody had a part in the rights of natural law. Based on individual
precondition, everybody was obliged to work on the perfection of the whole, which
implied the obligation to diminish evil and to augment good. For Wieland, no secret
doctrine was attached to the concept; on the contrary, cosmopolitanism was accessible
to all and constrained only by ignorance. Patriotism and cosmopolitanism were opposed
to each other and irreconcilable. Although Wieland calls for political neutrality and
acceptance of the respective form of government, implicitly he at the same time argues
that cosmopolitanism has to be integrated within good governance.
Only a year after Wieland's article, the French Revolution erupted and profoundly
changed the political landscape of Europe. Even moderate Enlightenment writers
like Wieland would ardently oppose the use of violence during the revolution, but the
change of cosmopolitanism from an apolitical to a political position was reflected in
different ways during the period. Not only was the French Declaration of the Rights of
Man extended to all men, but the French concept of citoyen was potentially universal in
its scope.
host. Every individual is entitled to rights and to live in a community ruled by law. Kant
introduced the category of world citizen (Weltbürger) in his philosophy, relating back
to the Stoic concept of a dual identity, particular and universal. In personal reason,
the world citizen is placed above the world, whereas in the perspective of external
reason, individuals are situated within the world as fellow citizens, where legal norms
are mutually agreed. Kant's ideas on cosmopolitanism have three elements. The
difference of the foreign Other has to be [p. 305 ↓ ] recognized without any conditions.
The freedom of the individual has to be guaranteed by cosmopolitan law that regulates
the relationship between individuals and states on a global scale. This legal order has
to be protected by institutions such as a league of nations. Finally, cosmopolitanism will
encourage a positive aesthetic experience of difference.
increasingly entangled world culture, the relationship between the universal and the
particular is gaining new relevance. Cosmopolitanism, in the terminology of Manuel
Castells, might imply a homogenizing centripetal force of globalization (e.g., in calls
for standardization). At the same time, it can be understood as facilitating diversity,
bringing postmodern eclecticism and tolerance to a new global and centrifugal level
balancing any potentially homogenizing world order. The discussion of multiculturalism
or a pluralistic society is related to the cosmopolitan ideal of mutual respect for
cultural differences, intercultural coexistence. When observing early 20th-century
immigrant communities in Chicago, Jane Addams branded a moral attitude based
on the acceptance of difference in unity as cosmic patriotism. This impression
has been intensified by ongoing developments of information and communication
technology (ICT), reinforcing the idea of instant and global dissemination of culture.
World citizenship can thus be understood from a communications perspective, with
participation in the global information society as its foundation. ICT also facilitates
global cyber-activism of nongovernmental organizations and other transnational
advocacy networks, bundling activities ahead of and during events such as G-8
meetings or UN summits. This activism derives its sense of legitimacy from ideas
resembling cosmopolitanism, a well-developed global consciousness demanding
responsibility and sustainability for the planet (its climate and environment) and for
humanity as a united and interrelated whole. From such a sense of membership in
a global civil society and moral universalism generally follows support of global or
transnational institutions in a cosmopolitan democracy. In contrast, transnational terror
is organized similarly, representing violent global activism directed against democracy
and the open society (in its Western fashion), based on shared values and particular
belief systems. Furthermore, the vision of cyber-activism in a global cosmopolitan
democracy has been impaired by state regulation and censorship of ICT as well as by
a digital divide between online and offline communities based on access to resources.
In the discussion of cosmopolitanism as a viable philosophy to balance economic
globalization, it has also been queried whether ethical universalism is possible at all.
David Östlund has recently argued that Eurocentric positions became entangled with
colonialist and imperialist agendas. Hence, following the critique of modernity, it is
possible to question the viability of a concept of cosmopolitanism that is rooted so
heavily in European values and perceptions of humankind.
[p. 306 ↓ ]
Taxonomy of Cosmopolitanism
Pauline Kleingeld has introduced a conclusive categorization of different forms of
cosmopolitanism. Originally researching varieties of late German Enlightenment
discourse, she distinguishes among six forms of cosmopolitanism that also are recurring
in the contemporary debate:
• 1. Moral cosmopolitanism represents the view that all human beings form
a single moral community and that there exist moral obligations to all other
human beings regardless of differentiations between them.
• 2. International confederative cosmopolitanism adds to this idea a political
theory advocating forms of world governance, for instance as represented by
a strong federation of states with coercive powers.
• 3. Cosmopolitan law represents the ideas formulated by Kant on the
necessity of a legal framework regulating the relationship between states and
individuals of foreign states, such as migration or business across borders in
the spirit of general hospitality.
• 4. Cultural cosmopolitanism embraces the (anthropological) idea of
mutual recognition of cultural differences, rejecting relativism as much as
essentialism.
AndreasÖnnerfors
http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452218557.n99
See also:
• Activism, Transnational
• Cosmopolitan Identity
• Enlightenment, The
• Ethics, Global
• Freemasons
• Globalization, Phenomenon of
• Identities in Global Societies
• Otherness
• Universalism
Further Readings
Kemp, P. (2010). Citizen of the world: Cosmopolitan ideals for the 21st century . New
York: Humanity Books.
Lettevall, R., ed. , & Linder Klockar, M. (Eds.), ed. . (2008). The idea of kosmopolis.
History, philosophy and politics of world citizenship . Stockholm: Södertörn Academic
Studies.