Professional Documents
Culture Documents
COMES NOW Defendant Lonnie Falgout, Individually, by and through his undersigned
counsel, and files this his Answer and Affirmative Defenses to the Plaintiffs’ Original Complaint,
FIRST DEFENSE
Plaintiffs’ Complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
SECOND DEFENSE
Defendant pleads all applicable statutes of limitations, including but not limited to the
statute of limitation set forth in Miss. Code Ann. Section 15-1-35 (2016) relative to assault and
THIRD DEFENSE
Although Defendant denies that Plaintiffs are entitled to punitive damages, Defendant
affirmatively pleads that an award of punitive damages would amount to a deprivation of property
Case 1:18-cv-00146-HSO-JCG Document 7 Filed 05/29/18 Page 2 of 9
without due process of law in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United
FOURTH DEFENSE
Plaintiffs alleged injuries were not caused by this Defendant.
FIFTH DEFENSE
Defendant pleads all applicable provisions of the Mississippi Tort Claims Act, Miss. Code
Ann. §11-41-1 et seq., including, but not limited to, all applicable statutes of limitations, all
exemptions from liability, all jurisdictional prerequisites to suit and no right to a jury trial.
SIXTH DEFENSE
Plaintiff L & L Marine Construction, L.L.C. lacks capacity to sue or be sued, pursuant to
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 17 (c) (2), the same not being registered with State of
SEVENTH DEFENSE
Plaintiffs’ purported injuries resulted from a party or parties other than Defendant and/or
EIGHTH DEFENSE
Defendant asserts all affirmative defenses that are or may become available or of which
Defendant may become aware (upon further investigation or discovery) under Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(c).
NINTH DEFENSE
Defendant asserts all affirmative defenses that are or may become available or of which
Defendant may become aware (upon further investigation or discovery) under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b).
Case 1:18-cv-00146-HSO-JCG Document 7 Filed 05/29/18 Page 3 of 9
ANSWER
Without waiving any of the aforementioned Affirmative Defenses, Defendant would
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
1. Defendant admits that Plaintiffs have filed the instant Complaint but deny there is any
basis to Plaintiffs’ claims against Defendant and deny any and all remaining allegations contained
STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION
2. The allegations contained in Paragraph 2 of the Complaint contain purported statements
of law and/or legal conclusions to which no response is required, and to the extent a response is
3. Defendant admits the United States District Court for the Southern District of
Mississippi, Southern Division has jurisdiction over the Plaintiffs’ federal claims, but deny the
4. Defendant admits the United States District Court for the Southern District of
Mississippi, Southern Division has supplemental jurisdiction over any state law claims, but deny
5. Defendant admits the United States District Court for the Southern District of
Mississippi, Southern Division is the proper venue for this matter, but deny the remaining
PARTIES
in Paragraph 6, including Sub-Paragraphs A-B, of the Complaint, and accordingly, deny same.
follows:
Paragraph 7(A) of the Complaint contain purported statements of law and/or legal conclusions to
which no response is required, and to the extent a response is required, they are denied.
of Bay St. Louis. The remaining allegations contained in Paragraph 7(B) of the Complaint contain
purported statements of law and/or legal conclusions to which no response is required, and to the
C. Defendant admits that Plaintiffs have asserted federal and state claims against the City
of Bay St. Louis but deny there is any basis to Plaintiffs’ claims against the City or any other
Defendant, and deny any and all remaining allegations contained in Paragraph 7(C) of the
Complaint. To the extent any allegations in Paragraph 7(C) are asserted against a party other than
Defendant, Defendant is without information sufficient to admit or deny the allegations contained
8. Defendant denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 8 of the Complaint and further
deny that Plaintiffs are entitled to relief of any kind. To the extent any allegations in Paragraph 8
are asserted against a party other than Defendant, Defendant is without information sufficient to
Case 1:18-cv-00146-HSO-JCG Document 7 Filed 05/29/18 Page 5 of 9
admit or deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 8 of the Complaint, and accordingly, deny
same.
FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
Defendant likewise incorporates his earlier responses to paragraphs 1 through 15 as if set forth in
full.
Defendant likewise incorporates his earlier responses to paragraphs 1 through 28 as if set forth in
full.
Defendant likewise incorporates his earlier responses to paragraphs 1 through 35 as if set forth in
full.
Defendant likewise incorporates his earlier responses to paragraphs 1 through 44 as if set forth in
full.
DAMAGES
51. The allegations of Paragraph No. 51 and all subparts therein are denied.
ATTORNEY FEES
Plaintiff’s prayer for relief does not require a response, but insofar as an answer is deemed
necessary, the Defendant DENIES that plaintiffs are entitled to the requested relief or to any relief
whatsoever.
Respectfully Submitted,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Steven Jay Irwin, do hereby certify that I have this date mailed through the United States
Postal Service, postage prepaid, or by hand delivery, a true and correct copy of the above and
foregoing Defendant Lonnie Falgout’s Answer and Affirmative Defenses to the Original
Jason T. Marsh
Phelps Dunbar
4270 I-55 North
Jackson, Mississippi 39211-6391
Telephone: 601-352-2300
Telecopier: 601-360-9777
Email: marshj@phelps.com
Patrick W. Kirby
Kirby Law Firm, P.L.L.C.
2304 19th Street, Suite 203
Gulfport MS 39501
(228) 467-2332
thekirbylawfirm@att.net