Technology Education,society and imagination.

Carlos Arturo Moreno Susatama

Students Licenciatura en Electronica
last semester
Idioma Extrangero II
Universidad Pedagogica Nacional 2018-1

Abstract

In this document, I want to give an idea, where engineers and scholars of technology, establish solutions
to a problem of social and cultural context, oriented to capitalist elements; in this text I want to show the
true meaning of the teacher and the epistemology of technology in the social area.

One of the issues I think is important to time real technology of philosophy

to work the world of technology, is to determine
In engineering, as in other areas related to edu-
what is the representation that this word generates
cation and technology, it is possible to think that we
before society, more in the context of education,
are all subjects of technology, when a problem is
different opinions arise, when trying to understand
detected we appropriate it, so that we can provide
the epistemology of this word; if was talk people
a solution in a specific context that contributes to
about technology, is because we think about ma-
human evolution.
king a change social ”we have come a long way in
However, from the engineering point of view, tech-
our eternal effort to control the natural environment
nology becomes about creating solutions in a social
and replace it with an artificial one”(Williams and
and cultural context, where people make it impor-
Bobrovski, 2004), Ms. Williams clarifies that it is
tant to develop gadgets as tools.
important to look at technology from a perspective
Now, we think about the design, construction and
of change that is significant and valid for human
use of artifacts, for the good of people, then, tech-
evolution, without disturbing the natural elements
nology becomes the discourse of technique, becau-
that make up the experience.
se it affects the social and cultural environment.
 important for a capitalist technology.

On the whole, only want to give solutions to

Imaginary Technology problems that do not relate to academia, these are
focused on providing solutions and studies for ca-
Personal ambitions and Utopian dreams, make
pitalist purposes ”The decisive intervention of non-
technology based on processes that are not linked
technical factors in technological development be-
to social construction. ”This lack of critical attitude
comes evident; In fact, it is always difficult to de-
led to a hostile reaction from natural scientists.”by
termine aprioriy without taking into account the
(Martı́nez, 2005), we think in the sense of engi-
context of the solution to a problem”by (Sáenz,
neering for the improvement of technology, we see
2004), it is easy to say that a problem is solved with
that it is losing its identity. because they think in a
an gadget but i think people need know the social
competitive and economical way.
context for to think about technology.
Ms Williams points out that in order to improve
society from the cultural context, the branches of
knowledge must be strengthened, she points out
that in order to improve society from the cultural Referencias
context, the branches of knowledge must be strengt- Martı́nez, S. F. (2005). Filosofı́a del cambio tec-
nológico: desarrrollo dependiente de trayecto-
hened, but our society thinks that technology is the
ria versus determinismo tecnológico. Actas del
TV, the latest cell phone on the market and they do XII Congreso Nacional de Filosofı́a AFRA, pa-
ges 1–6.
not know how to use these tools.
Sáenz, F. (2004). Mas allas del internet: la red uni-
After that, scholars can say that the courses that versal digital. Revista de la asociacion de tec-
have been taken to determine the cultural and so- nicos de informatica, 171:48 – 51.

cial changes, with the use of artifacts is a true, but, Williams, R. and Bobrovski, D. (2004). Cultura y
cambio tecnológico: el MIT. La Sociedad red.
consider an gadget as solution to the problems is Alianza Editorial.