Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A name, standing and status formally designated by Articles of the Peace issued from the
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, August 29,
1980: a Native American, and neutral traveler previously certified by and intending to return to
the De-Jure Georgia Commonwealth;
Cf. 1 Stat. 88, Act of April 20, 1818, Ch 88, §§ 2 (Service of any foreign prince or state); §
3 (Fitting out); § 6 (Military expeditions against friendly power); Act of July 27, 1868, 15 Stat.
Ch. 249 Pg. 223 (Rights of American citizens in foreign states); Act of March 3, 1887; 24 Stat.
505 (Tucker Act); Act of March 9, 1920, c. 95, 41 Stat. 525-528(Suits in Admiralty Act); Act of
March 3, 1925, ch. 428, § 1, 43 Stat. 1112 (Public Vessels Act); Pub. L. No. 105-119, 111 Stat.
2440 (1997) (Equal Access to Justice Act); 64 Fed. Dig. 1-403 § 17 (Property And Commerce Of
Neutrals In General) as amended; accord 5 U.S.C. § 573 et seq. (Neutrals) ; ORS 9.242 [1989
c.1052 §2] (Advice on law of foreign jurisdiction; rules); ORS 24.175 [1979 c.577 §7] (Uniform
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act); ORS 56.105 [1987 c.843 s.13](Waiver or delay of
action by Secretary of State; rules) ; N.B. GENERAL ORDERS NO. 100 (04/24/1863)(Lieber
Code); CONVENTION RESPECTING THE RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF NEUTRAL POWERS
AND PERSONS IN CASE OF WAR ON LAND (1907) as amended; CONVENTION
CONCERNING THE RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF NEUTRAL POWERS IN NAVAL WAR
(1907) as amended; UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS (1948) as amended;
US ARMY, FIELD MANUAL, FM 27-10, THE LAW OF LAND WARFARE § 512
(Definition); § 513 (Neutrality Under the Charter of the United Nations); § 514 (Notification of
State of War to Neutrals) ; § 515 (Inviolability of Territory) (18 Jul 1956) as amended; VIENNA
CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF TREATIES (1969) as amended; EXECUTIVE ORDER
13084 (CONSULTATION AND COORDINATION WITH INDIAN TRIBAL
GOVERNMENTS); EXECUTIVE ORDER 13107 (IMPLEMENTATION OF HUMAN
RIGHTS TREATIES); EXECUTIVE ORDER 13224 (BLOCKING PROPERTY AND
PROHIBITING TRANSACTIONS WITH PERSONS WHO COMMIT, THREATEN TO
COMMIT, OR SUPPORT TERRORISM); MEMORANDUM RE: LEGAL STANDARDS ON
TORTURE (12/31/2004); Rotella v. Wood et al, 528 U.S. 549 (02/23/2000) (a “private attorneys
general,” dedicated to eliminating racketeering activity); and that class of authority, infra:
Citing: Federal Crop Ins. Corp v. Merrill, 332 U.S. 380, the Supreme Court held: “Whatever the
form in which the government functions, anyone entering into an arrangement with the
government takes a risk of having accurately ascertained that he who purports to act for the
government stays within the bounds of his authority, even though the agent himself may be
unaware of the limitations upon his authority.”
“Silence can only be equated with fraud where there is a legal or moral duty to speak, or where
an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading. . .” U.S. v. Tweel, 550 F.2d 297,
299. See also U.S. v. Prudden, 424 F.2d 1021, 1032; Carmine v. Bowen, 64 A. 932.
Anything calculated to deceive another to his prejudice and accomplishing the purpose, whether
it be an act, a word, silence, the suppression of the truth, or other device contrary to the plain
rules of common honesty. 23 Am J2d Fraud § 2. An affirmation of a fact rather than a promise or
statement of intent to do something in the future. Miller v Sutliff, 241 111 521, 89 NE 651.
Citing: The 93rd Congress, Section 93-549:
Addressing the “Trading with the Enemy Act” as amended circa 1935 and making the American
people presumptive enemies of the state of the forum and that acts broad and unlimited powers
as promulgated within U.S.C. Title 50.
Speaking on the subject of a challenge to the Act by the people, Justice Clark then says,
“Most difficult from a standpoint of standing to sue. The Court, you might say, has enlarged the
standing rule in favor of the litigant. But I don’t think it has reached the point, presently, that
would permit many such cases to be litigated to the merits.”
“Senator Church then made the following observation:
“What you’re saying, then, is that if Congress doesn’t act to standardize, restrict, or eliminate the
emergency powers, that no one else is very likely to get a standing in court to contest.”
“No persona standi in judicio – no personal standing in the courts to challenge the
application of the Trading with the Enemy Act.
Thereby, out of necessity and due to the above referenced denial of standing to sue, cause is
given for relief, to rebut any and all such attaching presumption that this presenter is, or acts as
an enemy of the foreign state of the forum, united states, a insolvent body corporate.
Considering the above cite, the presenter of this document thereby preserves his right to proceed
both privately and commercially, absent his being held by presumption to be an “enemy of the
state of the forum” as provided by the legislatively crafted operation of law entitled as the
Trading With the Enemy Act, and as amended within the said acts related emergency provisions
found at 50 USCA.
Foreign neutral
[L.S.] _________________________________
“In the mouth of two or three witnesses shall every word be established.”
[L.S.] ____________________________________
SUBSCRIBED and AFFIRMED before Me, a Notary Public residing in Curry County, The State
of Oregon, the herein named Signator, John Quincy Doe appeared, known to Me and identified
himself and affixed His signature hereto, the _____day of _______________ 2005.
________________________________