Comment July 24, 2017 Issue

Amid revelations of Donald, Jr.,’s misguided meeting with two Russians, the President shows once again where his only loyalties lie.
Trump Family Values By David Remnick

n the September 11, 1989, issue of The New Yorker, a

I twenty-eight-year-old writer named Bill McKibben
Illustration by Tom Bachtell

published a lengthy article titled “The End of Nature.” The previous year had been especially hot––the country suffered one
of the worst droughts since the Dust Bowl, Yellowstone was ablaze for weeks––and some Americans, including McKibben,
a lengthy article
had taken note of the ominous testimony that James Hansen, a nasa climatologist, gave before a Senate committee,
warning that, owing to greenhouse gases, the planet was heating up inexorably. McKibben responded with a deeply
researched jeremiad, in which he set out to popularize the alarming and still largely unfamiliar facts about climate change
and to sharpen awareness of what they implied for the future of the planet and humankind:

Changes in our world which can affect us can happen in our

lifetime—not just changes like wars but bigger and more sweeping
events. Without recognizing it, we have already stepped over the
threshold of such a change. I believe that we are at the end of
nature.

By this I do not mean the end of the world. The rain will still fall,
and the sun will still shine. When I say “nature,” I mean a certain
set of human ideas about the world and our place in it. But the
death of these ideas begins with concrete changes in the reality
around us, changes that scientists can measure. More and more
frequently these changes will clash with our perceptions, until our
sense of nature as eternal and separate is nally washed away and
we see all too clearly what we have done.

Last week, a hunk of Antarctica the size of Delaware, weighing a trillion metric tons, hived off from the Larsen C ice shelf
and into the warming seas. Such events now seem almost ordinary—and harbingers of far worse. It is quite possible, the
environmental writer Fen Montaigne wrote recently, in the Times, that, should the much larger West Antarctic Ice Sheet
thaw and slip into the ocean, sea levels across the globe could rise as much as seventeen feet. This would have devastating
implications for hundreds of millions of people, disrupting food chains, swamping coastal cities, spawning illnesses,
sparking mass migrations, and undermining national economies in ways that are impossible to anticipate fully.

Around the time that this event was taking place, Donald Trump, who has lately detached the United States from the Paris
climate accord and gone about neutering the Environmental Protection Agency, was prowling the West Wing of the
White House, raging Lear-like not about the fate of the Earth, or about the fate of the Chinese dissident Liu Xiaobo, who
was dying in captivity, but about the fate of the Trump family enterprise. In particular, he decried the awful injustice visited
upon him and his son Donald, Jr., who had, in a series of e-mails last June, giddily advertised his willingness to meet with
Natalia Veselnitskaya, a Kremlin-connected lawyer, to receive kompromat intended to undermine the reputation and the
in a series of e-mails last June
campaign of Hillary Clinton. He did not mention another participant in the meeting: Rinat Akhmetshin, a Russian-born
to receive kompromat
lobbyist, who admitted to the A.P. that he had served in the Soviet Army, but denied reports that he was ever a trained spy.

The President argued that his son, “a high-quality person,” had been “open, transparent, and innocent.” This was a
statement as true as many, if not most, of the President’s statements. It was false. Donald, Jr., had concealed the meeting
until he could do so no longer. Social-media wags delighted in reviving the Trump-as-Corleone family meme and
had concealed the meeting
compared Donald, Jr., to Fredo, the most hapless of the Corleone progeny. This was unfair to Fredo. On Twitter, Donald,
Jr., had spoken in support of cockeyed conspiracy theories and once posted a photograph of a bowl of Skittles, writing, “If I
had a bowl of skittles and I told you just three would kill you, would you take a handful? That’s our Syrian refugee
problem. . . . Let’s end the politically correct agenda that doesn’t put America rst.”

Still, the President, loyal to nothing and no one but his family, argued that “a lot of people” would have taken that meeting.
Leaders of the U.S. intelligence community did not whistle their agreement. They were quick to say that such a meeting
was, at best, phenomenally stupid and, at worst, showed a willingness to collude with Moscow to tilt the election. Michael
Morell, a former acting director of the C.I.A., told the Cipher Brief, a Web site that covers national-security issues, that
Trump, Jr.,’s e-mails are “huge” and indicate that the President’s inner circle knew as early as last June that “the Russians
were working on behalf of Trump.” In the same article, James Clapper, the former director of National Intelligence, said
that the e-mails were probably “only one anecdote in a much larger story,” adding, “I can’t believe that this one exchange
represents all there is, either involving the President’s son or others associated with the campaign.” Intelligence officials
speculated that the tradecraft employed in setting up such a meeting was possibly a way to gauge how receptive the Trump
campaign was to even deeper forms of coöperation. In any case, the proper thing to have done would have been to call the
F.B.I. Now the country is headed toward a “constitutional crisis,” Clapper said, and the question has to be asked: “When
will the Republicans collectively say ‘enough’?”

Good question. Mike Pence, Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell, Ted Cruz, business leaders such as Stephen Schwarzman and
Carl Icahn, and a raft of White House advisers, including the bulk of the National Security Council, cannot fail to see the
chaos, the incompetence, and the potential illegality in their midst, and yet they go on supporting, excusing, and de ecting
attention from the President’s behavior in order to protect their own ambitions and fortunes. They realize that Trump’s
base is still the core of the G.O.P. electorate, and they dare not antagonize it. The Republicans, the self-proclaimed party
of family values, remain squarely behind a family and a Presidency whose most salient features are amorality, greed,
demagoguery, deception, vulgarity, race-baiting, misogyny, and, potentially—only time and further investigation will tell—a
murky relationship with a hostile foreign government.

In the near term, if any wrongdoing is found, the Trump family member who stands to lose the most is the son-in-law and
consigliere, Jared Kushner, who accompanied Donald, Jr., to the meeting with Veselnitskaya and Akhmetshin. Kushner
seems to see himself and his wife, Ivanka, as lonely voices of probity and moderation in an otherwise unhinged West Wing.
Why they would believe this when their con icts of interest are on an epic scale is a mystery. But such is their self-regard.
It is said by those close to Kushner that, if he fears anything, it is to repeat the experience of his father, Charles, who, in
2005, pleaded guilty to charges of making illegal campaign contributions and hiring a prostitute to entrap his brother-in-
law, and spent fourteen months in an Alabama penitentiary.

Meanwhile, as the Trump family consumes the nation’s attention with its colossal self-absorption and ethical delinquencies,
the temperature keeps rising. 

This article appears in other versions of the July 24, 2017, issue, with the headline “Things Fall Apart.”

David Remnick has been editor of The New Yorker since 1998 and a staff writer since 1992. He is the author of “ The Bridge: The Life and
Rise of Barack Obama.” Read more »
The Bridge: The Life and
Rise of Barack Obama.

More: Climate Change Donald Trump James Clapper Jared Kushner Jr.

Enter your e-mail

Sign up for our daily newsletter: the best of The New Yorker every day.
Go

Recommended Stories

Ryan Lizza Letter from Florida

How Climate Change Saved Miami Underwater

Steve Bannon’s Job By Elizabeth Kolbert Dec. 14, 2015

By Ryan
Lizza Jun. 02, 2017

open in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API pdfcrowd.com
 Comment Comment

Behind the Trump Phenomenon No More Magical Thinking

By David By David
Remnick Mar. 06, 2016 Remnick Nov. 12, 2012

Listen to the New Yorker Radio Hour Buy the Cover Play the Jigsaw Puzzle

© 2017 Condé Nast. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement
Follow Us (effective 1/2/2016) and privacy policy (effective 1/2/2016). Your California privacy rights. The
material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used,
except with prior written permission of Condé Nast.

Our sites

About Careers Contact FAQ Media Kit Press

News & Politics · Culture · Business, Science & Tech · Humor Cartoons · Books & Fiction · Magazine · Photography Video · Podcasts · Newsletters
Customer Care Buy the Cover Apps Jigsaw Puzzle Secure Drop Store RSS Site Map

open in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API pdfcrowd.com