Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A modest proposal:
Six secrets to perfecting a proposal
By Joseph Priest this much information under this kind of appear in the original
timeline. material are enclosed
It may be the most important docu- Mist;ikes on proposals are embarrass- in quotatii>n marks,
ment in public relations: the proposal. ing, unacceptable and, of course, detri- American Etigjish:'*!
Whether you work for an agency, a mental to business. Regardless of how won't go," Norma said.
corporarion or a nonprofit, a proposal for much time you have to pull together a British English;"l
new business, a new project or a new prDpos,il, what's important is to always won't gti". Norma
grant is a typical part of doin^ business. sweat the details and not settle for any- said.
But putting together a proposal can tlaing less than perfection. • Americans write
sometimes be anydiing but unifomi. Below are six cotninon errors to the abbreviations Mr.,
Some situations can involve large team avoid. Mrs.,St. and Dr. with a
efforts that require compiling a range of period. Britons usually,
capabilities and experience infomiation, l.Wouldyouorwillyou? but not always, write
recruiting the right colleagues to provide When you describe a proposed these as Mr. Mrs,St and
insights to address a business challenge, course of action, you can use the condi- Dr. without a period,
and rushing to produce aJI this informa- tional verb tense (would) or the future • In British
tion in snazzy booklets under tight dead- tense (will): Our team will start l^y devel- English, collective
lines. oping an influencer piognun.The condi- nouns that represent
Not surprisingly.many granimar- tional tense is less assuming while the groups of people gen-
and-style matters can fall thmugli the futtire tense expresses stronger intent, but erally take a plural verb.
cnick-s when this many people integrate either is OK. However, it s easy to inad- tion is a singular entity and should always unlilw American English. British English:
vertently jump back and forth between be referred to with the singular pronoun The goveminent are on the rigjit course,
these two tenses and create a section that "it." American Eny^ish:The government is on
For further reading from PRSA's reads sloppily. Remember to keep this the right course.
archives: verb choice consistent throughout the 4. Parallel structure
document. Proposals arc usually chock full of 6. One or two?
•'I3Iog basics: Writing oniine is bulleted lists, so remember the most com- ! inally,tliis may seem nitpickybut
much easier than you nught imag- 2. Mr., Ms., last name or first name? mon error with bulleted lists is a lack of inconsistent spacing following the end of
ine" February 2( H Xy, PR lactia When you describe the talents of p.irallel construction. If the first bulleted a sentence does make a difference. For the
your team in the bio section of proposals, item is a noun, die a'st of the items should a'cord, correct spacing afiier a punctua-
"Understanding the importance of its easy to alternate from a formal style be nouns. It the first iiem is a complete tion mark ending a sentence is t)ne space,
job descriptions: How to put diem (Mr.Joseph Gillis) to a casual one sentence, the rest of the items should be as not two.
in writing," February 2005. PR (Josepii) to one in-between (Gillis), well. Eacii item should be consistent with With the large number of people
Tiaics depending on how a bio was originally the intnidm tory sentence. who contribute to proposals,its likely
written or what style seenis most appro- that this inconsistency will crop up.Try to
"In style: A vetenmAP editor talks priate. The use of the first name tctids to 5.Watch your English enfoa e the one-space rule.To be sure, this
shop about the journalist s bible," be the most common style nowadays. If you re uoi king on a proposal team is a minor style issue,but its the same as if
February 2005, PR Tactics Whichever you choose, stick with it in all that includes both British- and black text were used in part of the pro-
the bios. Ainerican-Eny^h speakers, be surc to posal and gray text in another part. It's
"What do editors think?The craft designate someone who can act as a final small but noticeable. Any inconsistenLy
of good writing," February 2004, 3.A company is only one authority in proofing the use of EngUsli. you can eliminate will make the final
PR'lactks When including case studies in a Although British En^sh and American product better. O
proposal, a common pitfall in describing English are generally intea hangeable,
members liave access to ftill- past work is to refer to a corporation with enougli diftea*nces exist to cause misun-
text PDFs of these articles — as well a plural pronoun:When Company XYZ derstandings. A few reminders;
n>iiiiiiiiiii,.:ih>ii.i ill Kcithiitn's
as two-page outlines of Silver Anvil launched its program, they needed a way ^'tti'York I'lJicr ,uui ai'Wnii'i a
Award entries — throajj^i the PRC to raise awareness.Tliis reflects the infor- iiumihly slytc-Mi(i-tisii_^e nni-xkt-
• hi American English, periods and
ler. He (an if micbrii.»
Search under the MemberNet area mal conversational style of referring to a commas are always enclosed in closing um. com.
at www.prsa.org. O person or company in a plural form. In quotation marks. In liritish En^ish, how-
writing, however, remember a corpora- ever, only those punctuation marks tliat
timely, complete and correct infbnnadon. targeted publics' behavior change? In what memos in support of forthcoming planning
i a( lexas ChmiuiH
2.1 hniughputs —A tiUIy of people way. By how much? Did the outcomes efforts. An additionid benefit to making the ityill I-im 11'onh,Iiwiu
exposed to the information. Indicates how match the objectives? What is the value to infonnation moa- accessible is gctdng die
well the infomiation is "packaged." the organization? information to responsible managers in its Jim Harnes,APR.Feliow PRSA
3. Outputs —What information was most usable fonu. O I* .1 imttilhi of PRSA's 200S-
distributed and to whom. Your most daunting writing task is like- 2009 }xian\ ofdimtim ,itiil is .i
liiinriyr atui itnior cotuiiltaiH al
4. Outtakes — Did the target audience ly to be a thorough report that summarizes QuukSihrrbtlentiiiw (imif),
iu. /-(inn & Slylt; Sih tdilwn, 200X,
see die messages? Did they believe them? theresultsof the effort. Information in these voiii ami
Itu: iti Diiltiif. li-niail:
5. Results —This is of tiiost interest to reports, tliough. can be usefU and easier to
TACTTCS FebfiJafy2008 17