Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Donny Doan
Laurie Oberg
English
22 January 2018
Growing up without television, I spent almost all of my free time on YouTube when it
became popular. I was around eight years old at the time and didn’t really discover things that
were interesting to me yet, so I just clicked on videos with cool thumbnails or with large amounts
of views. Because of this, I ended up watching a lot of videos by “Fred Figglehorn” and random
documentaries. I only watched Fred because he had a lot of views and documentaries because of
the cool thumbnails, and somehow, I was more interested in the documentaries despite barely
having a grasp on the information the documentaries threw at me. One of the documentaries
stated that dogs could smell much better than we could, and could even smell diseases such as
cancer, which was one of the few concepts I could understand at the time, and I had been
interested by how dogs could smell cancer ever since. I did a little bit of research this year and
found that the smells that dogs were picking up were mainly metabolic biomarkers, specifically
volatile organic compounds, which are compounds that evaporate easily under normal
conditions, such as perfume, which is sprayed as a liquid that quickly evaporates into the air.
With this research project, I plan to figure out how these biomarkers work and how they
are used to determine the presence of diseases, specifically cancer. I think searching for research
articles from Google Scholars would be my best bet. Unfortunately, many research papers found
on Google Scholars were locked and I had to pay a rather high amount of money to view the
papers. On some sites, I even had to message one of the administrators to ask for pricing of the
Doan 2
papers for me in particular, so the sites could charge differently per person, which was absurd.
Of course, I’m rather poor, so I found a way to access the articles without having to pay for the
papers or messaging some admin for the pricing of the papers. I doubt what I did was legal, but
whatever, I’m broke, and education should be cheap and free anyway.
From my possibly illegal research, I’ve found that metabolic biomarkers are compounds
that are excreted by cells as waste products that can be used to determine the presence of
disorders and diseases. These biomarkers that are excreted are varied by many different possible
circumstances such as weather (Acevado, Cristian A, et al) (This one was legal by the way) and
the changes in cell function, which is changed by the presence of a disease or disorder.
Out of all the metabolic biomarkers, I’ve noted that dogs were primarily smelling the
volatile substances since the substance had to be in the air to travel to the nasal cavity where the
olfactory receptor cells, the cells that catch the volatile compounds as smells, reside. Because of
this, only volatile compounds that were determined to be biomarkers of a specific disease could
At this point, I’ve found how dogs smell cancer but I hadn’t answered my question yet,
so after a little bit more legally questionable research, I had found that scientists have started
using volatile compounds, which are the ones dogs can smell, as biomarkers for lung cancer and
have even developed a breath test for the detection of the presence of these compounds. This
means the detection of lung cancer could be replicated with a simple breath test instead of a
biopsy and a computerized tomography scan (CT scan). Further testing would have to be done to
determine the viability of the breath test of course (Phillips, Michael, et al, 1999).
I have also found that the use of volatile compounds as biomarkers is being used for early
detection of breast cancer. The research conducted on the early detection of breast cancer was
Doan 3
done by some of the researchers who created the breath test for lung cancer. They also created a
breath test for breast cancer, similar to the one used for lung cancer. Like the lung cancer breath
test, the breast cancer breath test was less invasive as compared to the current diagnosis
Unfortunately, these breath tests have not been verified for diagnostic use yet, and will
require additional testing before they are verified for diagnostic use.
Another thing I learned is that most if not all research on volatile compounds as
biomarkers use gas chromatography and mass spectrometry for identification of the volatile
compounds collected. Unfortunately, I couldn’t find any info on how the breath tests were made,
which was only expected since if they released info on how the breath tests were made, someone
Research on collection of volatile compounds from skin has also been conducted, where
the use of solid-phase microextraction was used to collect the volatile compounds from skin,
which were run through gas chromatography and mass spectrometry for analysis (Gallagher, M.,
et al. 2008). This study was not used for detection of cancer or biomarkers for any specific
diseases or disorders, but I found the article interesting because of the methods used for
From this research, I have learned that volatile biomarkers are used for early detection of
cancer because they are the compounds that signal the possible presence of diseases such as
cancer. Also, the use of volatile compounds for the detection of cancer is a lot cheaper,
accessible, and easily conducted as compared to current methods which is primarily based on
Abaffy, T., et al. “Comparative analysis of volatile metabolomics signals from melanoma and
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3769583/.
Acevado, Cristian A, et al. “Volatile Organic Compounds Produced by Human Skin Cells.”
scielo.conicyt.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0716-
97602007000400009&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en.
Gallagher, M., et al. “Analyses of volatile organic compounds from human skin.” The British
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2574753/.
Phillips, Michael, et al. “Volatile organic compounds in breath as markers of lung cancer: a
www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673698075527.
Phillips, Michael, et al. “Prediction of breast cancer using volatile biomarkers in the breath.”
9176-1.