Professional Documents
Culture Documents
WORM GEARS
Structure
1 1.1 Introduction
Objectives
1 1.2 Nomenclature and Forces
1 1.3 Surface Strength and Helical Teeth
1 1.4 Beam Strength of Helical Tooth
1 1.5 Load Factors
1 1.6 Bevel Gears
1 1.7 Forces in Bevel Gear
11.8 Surface Strength of Tooth in Bevel Gear
11.9 Beam Strength of Bevel Gear Tooth
1 1.10 Worm and Worm Gears
1 1.1 1 Geometry and Velocity Ratio
1 1.12 Forces in Worm and Worm Gear
1 1.13 Designing of Worm Wheel
1 1.14 Summary
1 1.15 Key Words
1 1.16 Answers to SAQs
11.1 INTRODUCTION
The gears were introduced in Unit 10. The design of straight tooth spur gear was
developed from first principles. It is desirable that you should get clear understanding of
gear classification. The classification is based on the two shafts on which gears are
mounted. In this class of gear two types are possible. Straight tooth gears have their teeth
parallel to shaft axis. Helical gears have teeth inclined to shaft axis at angle of helix.
Bevel gears have intersecting shafts. Worm gears mate with worms which are like
threads. The shafts of worm and worm gear are in parallel planes but perpendicular to
each other.
The design of all these gears follow the same basic premises that teeth can fail either due
to surface compressive stress or due to bending of teeth. The formula that were derived
for straight tooth spur gears can be modified to suit the changed geometrical conditions.
In each case the understanding has to develop how the forces will act on teeth and how
they will be transmitted to the shafts.
Objectives
After studying this unit, you should be able to
make clear distinction between types of gears,
calculate forces on gear teeth,
design helical, bevel, worm gears and worms, and
choose various materials to make gears.
Design of Power
Transmission Devices 11.2 NOMENCLATURE AND FORCES
In Section 10.1 1 of last unit helical gear was introduced and some terms pertaining to
helical gear were described. Also the force analysis to calculate force on the helical gear
was done. These are repeated in brief and reference is made to Fi'gure 10.17.
The tooth length or face width in helical gear is larger than the width of gear which is
measured parallel to the gear axis. Apparently the difference between the tooth face
width and gear width will depend upon the helix angle P. The normal circular pitch and
normal module denoted respectively by p,,, and m,, are quantities measured perpendicular
to the tooth line whereas transverse circular pitch (p,,) and transverse module (m,) are the
quantities measured along the circumference of the gear or perpendicular to the axis
(Figure 10.17).
The Eq. (10.13) gives the relationship.
m, = m, cos p . . .(11.1)
If a helical gear is cut by a plane perpendicular to the teeth an ellipse of radius of
r
curvature of --- at the pitch point will be obtained, r is the radius of curvature at the
cos2 p
pitch point if gear is cut by plane perpendicular to the axis. If a circle is drawn with a
r
radius of -and on it are placed teeth of module m,, the resulting tooth profile is
c0s2 p
same as the profile of the helical tooth in the normal section. The former may be called
an equivalent or virtual gear and the number of teeth on this gear is called equivalent or
virtual number of teeth denoted by Zv, Eq. (10.16) is reproduced here.
tan P
19100 H -
P, =
Nd cos p
19100 H
Also P, = tan a,
Nd
Here H i s the power transmitted (kW), d is pitch circle diameter (m), a,,
is the pressure
angle in plane normal to the tooth and a,is the pressure angle in transverse plane.
The main advantage of the helical gears is that the profiles of teeth come in contact
gradually along the contact line both over the face width and depth of the tooth
(Figure 11.l(a)). The contact ratio in helical gear is quite high as compared to that in the
straight tooth gear. As many as 10 pairs of teeth may be in contact simultaneously
depending upon angle P. Such high contact ratio makes the gear operation smooth and Helical, Bevel and
Worm Gears
shock free and the noise is reduced considerably. As a result the dynamic load on the
I helical gear is much less than in case of straight tooth gear, permitting higher peripheral
I velocities. These speeds could as large as 60 to 70 mls.
(b) Double Helical gears Mounted on the Same Shaft. Axial Reaction is Neutralised
Apparent disadvantages of a helical gear is the axial load P, given by Eq. (1 1.4). This
force may be eliminated by using gears of opposite helix angles side by side or gear
which has teeth cut in opposite directions as herringbone gear. A herringbone gear has
teeth cut in opposite inclined direction on a gear blank. It has the advantage of increased
face width. Figures 1I . 1(b) and ( c ) shows two helical gears placed side by side and a
herringbone gear, respectively.
When a number of teeth pairs make contact simultaneously the effective contact length of
face width in helical gear will increase in comparison with a straight tooth spur gear of
same transverse face width. The factor by which the effective face width increase may be
denoted by u, such that
Effective face width = u b . . . (i)
1
where UoC- . . . (ii)
c0s2 p
To increase u one may recommend to increase p. But looking at Eq. (1 1.4) one can see
that higher value of P will result in higher axial reaction. To make a compromise, value
of p is often selected between 8" and 20" though in cases of double helical gears and
herringbone gear P can be as high as 45".
Design o f Power The normal value of pressure angle in case of helical gear is 90" in the plane normal to
Transmission Devices the teeth and gear properties are calculated based upon this angle and normal module.
All notations have been same meaning as already stated in last unit. Eq. (10.7) may be
written as
If permissible surface stress, as given in Table 10.10, is denoted by a,,, the design
equation for centre distance, A will be
2 A cos P
or m, =
2, + 2,"
The normal module, m,, can be chosen over a wide range of (0.01 to-0.02) A.
Helical, Bevel and
Worm Gears
The bending strqss in the tooth of a helical gear can be calculated by Eq. (10.3 1) of last
unit. To adop<thi%iquationfor a helical tooth m, b and a are respectively replaced by m,,
1.35 b and a,,. m, is subsequently replaced by - mn
cos p '
The Eq. (10.3 1) is first reproduced here,
.?r
19100 K H 1
-
a= .
N x 1.35 b d, cos a, m, Y
Here dv is the diameter of virtual pitch circle on which the profile of tooth of module m,,
coincides with the profile of normal tooth cross-section. Reference Figure 10.17(b),
Eq. (10.15) and Section 11.1.
d
But d, =-
c0s2 p
d = m s Z = - mn Z
cos p
Hence, d, =- mn Z
cos p
L
But Z, = -= virtual or equivalent number of teeth on a gear of diameter d,.
COS~ p
Hence, d , = m, Zv
Using b=mn ym
The tooth from factor Y is chosen for number of teeth Zv, from Eq. (10.32). m, will be
measured in m. Eq. (10.1 I ) is used to calculate design of working stress in the tooth of
the helical gear and for safe design o < ob where ob is the permissible stress. W, is chosen
to lie between 20-30 for open drive and between 40-60 for closed drive.
Eq. (1 1.1 1) is transformed into a design equation to calculate m,, i.e.
where K, is fatigue strength reduction factor and n, the factor of safety (Table 10.15).
Comparison of Eqs. (10.28) and (I 1.8) for centre distance and of Eqs. (1 0.33) and
(1 1.12) for normal module will suggest that a helical gear drive will be smaller than a
straight tooth spur gear drive for same power and rpm. Yet another factor that tends to
reduce overall gear dimensions is the dynamic load factor Kdwhich is less in case of
helical gears. The load concentration factor Kc is same for both gear types.
Design of Power
Transmission Devices 11.5 LOAD FACTORS
Design load factor, K was:introduced in the consideration of design equations as product
of load concentration factor, Kc and dynamic loadfactor, Kd.
Kc arises because the pressure between teeth when contact is established is not uniform
along the face width. The non-uniformly of contact pressure arises due to deformation of
tooth and shaft. The tooth deforms due to torque and also due to bending of shaft on
which gear is mounted. The ratio of maximum pressure to mean pressure is defined as Kc.
It represents the fact that force intensity at certain point on the tooth face will be higher
than at any other point. This higher intensity is more likely to cause greater damage,
hence must be used in calculation.
It becomes clear from the definition that shafts which are more likely to deform will
b
result in higher Kc value. Further the teeth that are longer (- ratio large) will also
dP
require higher value of Kc. So rigid shafts will cause smaller Kc while flexible shafts will
result in large Kc. If gear is placed symmetrically between bearings and close to bearings,
Kc will be small. Kc will be same for straight tooth and helical spur gears.
The dynamic load factor, Kd, mainly arises due to impact that occurs between teeth at the
beginning of contact. The inaccuracy in gear cutting causes the first point of contact not
to lie exactly on line of action. Moreover, the deformation on teeth immediately after
loading may cause point of contact to shift from line of action. It may be understood here
that the elastic deformation of teeth has opposite effects on pinion and wheel. It reduces
circular pitch on driving wheel while increases circular pitch on driven wheel. This
causes hammering of the particular tooth and acceleration on driven wheel. Such
hammering conditions, resulting in load enhancement will arise when the tip of the
driven wheel is making contact with dedendum portion of the driving pinion or when the
tip of the driving pinion is breaking contact with the dedendum of the driven wheel.
The value of factor Kd will naturally depend upon degree of accuracy of manufacture, the
velocity with which point of contact moves in or out and on hardness of the tooth
surface. The Kd will increase with increasing peripheral velocity for same hardness and
will reduce with increasing hardness for same velocity. The factor Kd will reduce with
increasing accuracy. Degree of accuracy is described by numbers 6 , 7 , 8 and 9. 6 is the
highest degree of accuracy corresponding to gear teeth which are shaved and ground.
Such gears are used with peripheral velocity in higher range (from 3 m/s to 12 m/s).
Hobbed and shaped gear teeth have accuracy corresponding to 7 and 8. Degree of
accuracy of 9 is obtained in gear teeth which are cut or milled and not generated.
The American Gear Manufacturers Association (AGMA) recommends following formula
for Kd.
For degree of accuracy 6 (teeth shaved and ground)
Peripheral velocity, v, is in d s .
The AGMA formulae for Kd do not consider hardness. Following tables may be used to
find Kd for straight tooth spur gears and helical gears.
I Table 11.1 : Dynamic Load Factor for Straight Tooth Spur Gears Helical, Bevel and
Worm Gears
Peripheral Velocity (mls)
b
Table 1 1.3 describes load concentration factor K, against v p = -.
dP
Near Toothed
From above description and tables it becomes clear that without knowledge of pitch
circle diameters of gears Kc and K d cannot be found (peripheral velocity will require
PCD). Therefore, the design equations developed cannot make use of these factors. The
solution is to assume Kcx KA= K = 1.5 and then determine pitch circle diameter and
Design of Power peripheral velocity. Then find v, and corresponding value of Kc fi-om Table 1 1.3 and
Transmission Devices value of Kd from Tables 11.1 or 1 1.2, respectively for straight tooth and helical spur
gears. Thereafter the product of Kc and Kd is checked to be less than 1.5 or equal to 1.5. If
this product turns out to be greater than 1.5 then module is increased to next step and
'
calculations redone to find the product of Kc and Kd. The procedure may be repeated until
we obtain K l 1.5.
The AGMA procedure of design starts from assumption of suitable value of module.
Such values can be selected from experience. Then bending stress is calculated with Kd
alone. The factor Kc is taken care of by limiting face width as
9 . 4 m < b < 15.7m
The calculated bending stress must be less than permissible stress of Eq. (1 1.13). This
takes care of fatigue loading. If calculated stress comes out to be greater than permissible
bending stress then the value of module is increased and calculation is repeated to find
fresh value of stress. If o < 06 then design is checked for surface stress.
Example 11.1
A 20 tooth pinion is required to transmit 20 kW of power to a 100 tooth gear. The
pinion and gear are held in a rigid housing with bearings arranged symmetrically
near them. The pinion is driven by an electric motor through a coupling at
950 rpm. Choose a steel which can be surface hardened to 350 BHN and assume
width to centre distance ratio of 0.6 and a factor of safety of 1.6 for surface stress.
Design straight tooth spur gear and helical gears of 30" helix assuming total design
load factor of 1.5 for straight tooth gear and 1.4 for helical gear. Also assume
pressure angle of 20" of straight tooth spur gear and in the plane normal to teeth for
helical gear.
Solution
Straight Tooth Spur Gear
Use centre distance formula
100
Substitute i = -= 5, K = 1.5, H = 20 kW, N j = 950 rpm, = 0.6
20
0.7 o,
= - , o, = 3.3 BHN = 3.3 x 350 = 1155 MPa
K, x n
1.23 3.38
Y, =0.154--+- for pinion
20 202
Use K = 1.4, and all other values same as in case of straight tooth spur gear
1
2A2 cos P
.. m, =
Z, (1 + i)
-
- 2 x 174.2 x cos 30
= 2.9 x 0.866 = 2.51 1 mm
20 (1 + 5 )
Next higher value of m, is chosen as 2.75 mm or 2.75 x 1 o - m~
. . . (iv)
Dcsigtl of Power . . . (v)
Transmission Devices
. . . (vi)
or Y2=0.1176
The bending stress in tooth is calculated from Eq. (1 1.I 1)
or o=45x10"a or 45MPa
a is much less than a b= 1155 MPa.
We will compare the two solutions for H = 20 kW.
Dimensions of straight tooth and helical gear for transmitting same power,
same material and hardness.
Helical
Note all dimensions for helical gear are smaller than corresponding values
for straight tooth spur gear. The working bending stress is also less.
SAQ 1
(a) Show forces acting on a tooth of helical spur gear and write their
magnitudes in terms of power transmitted (kW).
Explain factors Kc and Kd.
Define normal and transverse modules and give relation between them.
A closed helical gear drive has been designed to transmit 7 kW of power.
Following are details of gears :
Material of pinion and gear - carbon steel heat treated to a, = 620 MPa
RPM of pinion, N, = 950
Bevel gears are used to transmit power between two shafts that are coplanar but inclined
to each other. The gears are formed by cutting teeth along the elements of frustum of a
cone. Though it is not necessary, yet it is a practice that shaft angle between bevel gears
is 90". Figure 1 1.2 describes various terms used for bevel gears.
Bevel frictional drives in which conical surfaces are pressed against each other can
transmit power like cylindrical surfaces. The conical surfaces transmitting same velocity
ratio as the bevel gears are called pitch cones. The apices of pitch cones are located at the
point of intersection of the shaA axes. The teeth cut on conical surface will diminish in
dimensions (i.e. both thickness and depth) towards the apices. This can be seen in
Fieure 1 1.2.
Crown
d, in Figure 11.2(b) correspond to the circle passing through the middle of the face width. i
The geometrical relationship among face width, 6 ; pitch diameter of gear, dw;cone
distance L and mean pitch diameter, d,,,, is illustrated in Figure 11.3. From this figure
0.5b
d,, = dw - -dw
L
Then
.I
Ln.
0 I
.I
0 .
Figure 11.3 :Relationship d o n g Face Width, Cone Distance, Pitch Radii and
Mean Pitch Radius of Bevel Gear
The mean module m, and maximum module m,, have already been defined. The
equivalent spur gear of the bevel gear is seen in Figure 11.2(b). The pitch radius of this
equivalent spur gear is equal to back cone distance and marked as h.
2
Similar
equivalent pitch diameter of pinion will be denoted by d,,. From Figure 1 1.2(b) it can be
seen that
and dpe = -
d~
cos W
Divide first of the above by the second equation
i Helical. Bevel :111tl
ie = i t a n y ~ , =- Worm Gears
tan w,
Since ~ ~ + ~ ~ = 9 o ~
. .2
Hence 1, =1
Also from Eq. (1 1.20) the equivalent centre distance or centre distance between
equivalent spur gear pair will be given by
dpe 1
But - is the inverse of equivalent velocity ratio, i.e. - which from Eq. (1 I .21) is
d we 1,
1
equal to T5-.
I
Hence . . . (i)
d w = L sin y ~ ,
-
2
Hence dwe -
- - L tan y, = iL (from Eq. (1 1.20))
2
I
Figure 11.4 : A Bevel Pinion and earShowing the Forces Acting on Teeth in Contact. The Figure
also Shows Modification in d, and d , that they are Measured at Mid Point ofthe Tooth
( I:
distance may be seen to have changed to L - - from L (Figure 1.4). Hence, the
The design of a bevel gear is based upon the assumption that the driving force P in the
equivalent spur gear of equivalent diameter is same as the driving force in actual bevel
gear of given mean diameter when face width of the equivalent spur gear is 85% of actual
bevel gear face width and the two are rotating with the same speed.
Let H = Power transmitted in kW by bevel gear,
o = Angular speed of bevel gear or equivalent spur gear. It will be o, and owfor
pinion or gear,
dl,,= Mean diameter of the bevel gear. It will be d,,, or d,, for pinion or gear,
d, = Equivalent diameter of the spur gear. It will be d,, or d,, for pinion or gear,
and
H, = Power transmitted in kW by equivalent spur gear.
Then l 0 0 0 H = P -dm
a
2
and
Hence,
However,
Hence, H,=H,/~~+I
i2 + I
or
Design of Power The maximum surface stress induced in the tooth of a spur gear is given by Eq. (10.25).
Transmission Devices The same equation can be used to calculate the surface stress in the tooth of a bevel gear
provided the quantities are replaced in the following manner,
Hence, omax =
The design load factor K = Kc x Kd has also been introduced. Substituting for
A, (Eq. (1 1.27)), i, (Eq. (1 1.21)), Hp (Eq. (1 1.28)) and be = 0.85 b.
H will be replaced by H , =
1
d z
m will be replaced by m,
Helical, Bevel and
dPnl
d will be replaced by dpe = -----
COSW,
-
-
2, ms
cosyl,
- Worm G e a r s
b will be replaced by m, W,
where W, is a factor which varies between 8 and 10.
19100 K H j Z c o s W p
Hence, oh =
n cos 20 i Np 2, m: W, Y
,/z1-
Hence,
The permissible stress obis in Pa and in, in m. The form factor, Y, is obtained
corresponding to Z,.
i Example 11.2
An open bevel gear drive is required to transmit 3.5 kW of power. The pinion
having 18 teeth and made in steel rotates at 200 rpm. The gear made in C.1 rotates
I
at - of the speed of pinion. The ultimate tensile strengths of pinion and gear
4
materials are respectively 480 MPa and 230 MPa. Assume total design load factor
K = 1.5, W L = 4 and W, = 8. Calculate mean pitch diameters, pitch diameters, face
width, mean module and maximum module of the pinion and gear. Also calculate
the driving force, radial force and axial force on the pinion and gear.
Solution
For open drive the design will be based on bending strength. Eq. (1 1.30) will, thus
be used. However, this equation will be applied to either pinion or gear, depending
upon which one is weaker. The comparative strength will be determined by
comparing the product Y oband the one for which this product is smaller will be
regarded as weaker.
I The permissible stresses are calculated from
0.7 o,
Steel ob =-
n Ke
1.4 x 0.4 o,
and C.1- ob =
n Ke
From Table 10.15, for uniformly hardened steel
n = 1.8, K,= 1.2
From the same table for C.1 which is untreated,
n = 2.5, K, = 1.2
0.7 x 480
.. o, (steel) = = 155.6 MPa
1.8 x 1.2
1.4 x 0.4 x 230 = 43 Mpa
and ob ((2.1) =
2.5 x 1.2
Design of Power 1.23 3.38
Transmission Devices Tooth from factor, Y = 0.154 - -+ -
z z2
For pinion, Y, =0.154
3.38
--1.23 - +
= 0.096
18 1 8 ~
For C.1,
The maximum module at the bigger end of the tooth corresponds to pitch diameter.
Use Eq. (11.19)
5.8
.. m,, = -= 6.63 mm . . . (i)
0.875
The standard module next higher than 6.68 is 7.0 mm.
:. Pitch circle diatneter, dw= 7 x 72 = 504 mm . . . (ii)
Pinion pitch circle diameter, d,, =7 x 18 = 126 mm . . . (iii)
Since, i=tanyw=4
y w= tan,' = 76'
L =L = = 259.75 mm . . . (iv)
2 2
L 259 75
Face width b = -= -- = 65 mm
WL 4 . . . (v)
The mean diameters of pinion and gear from Eqs. (1 1.18) and (1 1.19)
. . . (vi)
. . . (vii)
The driving force fro111Eq. (1 1.3) Helical, Bevel and
Worm Gears
19100 H - 19100x 3.5 = 3032 N
e v = - . . . (viii)
N , d,,,, 50 x 44 1 x lo-'
(c) In a closed bevel gear drive pinion with 29 teeth rotates at 1000 rpm and
transmits 25 kW of power to gear of I00 teeth. Both pinion and gear are
made in medium carbon steel which is normalised and hardened to
350 BHN. The design load factor is 1.5 for gears of pressure angle of 20".
~ J=L 5. Determine
Worm dl2 -1
Figure 11.5
Helical, Bevel and
Worm Gears
The distance zl p is called lead of the screw or worm and denoted by S, so that
Now if the nut has been converted into worm gear then it will move about its axis
through an angle corresponding to an arc length of S whereas total circumferencial length
is x D.
The angle through which worm gear rotates,
. . . (ii)
During this motion of worm gear the worm has rotated through one rotation or through
an angle of 2x. If the speed of worm and worm wheel are respectively N I and N2 rpm,
then
N, a 2x
4 -- -
Hence, i = velocity ratio = - xD . . . (iii)
N2 21 P
The worm and worm gear moving in contact will have the relationship that
Pitch of screw = Circular pitch of the wheel
The circular pitch of the wheel is defined as the circumference of the wheel divided by
number of teeth on the wheel. Hence, p in (iii) can also be written as
Design of Power
Transmission Devices
i.e. velocity ratio of worm and worm wheel is the ratio of number of teeth on the wheel
and number of starts on the worm. Thus a high velocity ratio can be obtained by having a
worm of single start (z, = 1) for same number of teeth on worm gear.
The shape of the worm threads in axial section is shown in Figure 1 1.7. This section is
same as profile of a rack and the included angle at the top is often 28 = 40". This kind of
worm whose section in axial plane is trapezium is called Archimedean screw. The pitch
and axial module are related as
p=xm . . . (iv)
Using Eq. (1 1.32)
Here q represents the number of modulus in the pitch diameter of the worm, q is
normally chosen between 8 and 13.
Various dimensions of worm and worm wheel are illustrated in Figure 11.8. The
dimensions and nomenclature will be described subsequently. The lead of the thread in a
screw was defined in Unit 5 and for single start screw (i.e. z l = 1) the helix angle is given
by Eq. (5.1). By the same definition the lead angle
a = tan - 1 S
xd
where d is the pitch diameter of the worm.
Using Eq. (1 1.32) in Eq. (v)
a = tan - I
xd
Using Eq. (iv) and Eq. (1 1,35) in Eq. (vi)
a = tan- 1 -
21
4
,. The lead angle in worm is same as the helix angle in the screws. In case of worms the Helical, Bevel and
Worm Gears
helix angle is complementary of lead angle. If helix angle is denoted by h, then
a + h = 90' . . . (vii)
This is shown in Figure 1 1.8.
Won
Pitch cylinder
Helix angle
The centre distance between worm and wheel is denoted by A . With reference to
Figure 1 1.8
(viii)
Where d is the pitch diameter of worm and D is the pitch diameter of worm wheel. D,
and d, are the addendum diameters while Dd and dd are the dedendum diameters of wheel
and worm respectively. Do is the outside diameter of worm and
since the wheel rim envelops the worm. The degree of envelopment is defined by the face
angle 2y.
The face width of the worm is denoted by b.
The various dimensions are calculated by using following equations.
Then
19100 H 1 Helical, Bevel and
Hence, P= ,N Worm Gears
N, d tan ( a + 4)
where d is the diameter of worm in m.
The Eq. (I I .4l) thus gives the turning force on the wheel.
a, is the pressure angle of worm in the nomlal section cut by a plane perpendicular to the
thread. If the section is considered cut by a plane through the axis then pressure angle
will be a, (different than a,). Both angles a,, and a, are illustrated in Figure 11.10 from
which it appears that the normal force P,, produced on thread surface can be resolved into
two components, viz., T and R. R is the force which tends to separate worm and gear and
will cause bending of the shafts of worm and worm wheel. Apparently
T = 4, cos a, . . . (i)
R = P, sin a, . . . (ii)
The force T acts in the horizontal plane with reference to the vertical plane worm wheel
shown in elevation in Figure 1 1.9. The same force is shown in plane of worm in this
figure. The force T acts at an angle a (the lead angle) with the axis of the worm. T is
resolved into two components, viz, P , and Q, P is the driving force on wheel while being
parallel to axis of worm. Q is the driving force on worm while being parallel to axis of
d d
worm wheel. The torque on the worm will be Q - while P - will be a bending
2 2
D
moment on the worm shaft. Similarly Q - will be a bending moment on the shaft of the
2
worm gear. From Figures 1 1.9 and 1 1.10.
P = T c o s a = P, cos a cos a,
r
so that P, = . . . (iii)
cos a cos a,
. . . (iv)
19100 H tan a,
R= from Eq. (1 1.44)
N, d tan ( a + 4)
Q,
2
d
and a transverse force Q on the shaft.
The reader must calculate the reactions on right and left hand supports by taking
moments about left and right hand supports respectively and ascertain the values
shown in Figure 11.11.
Rl P d
:. Maximum BM (at mid section) in vertical plane, M y = - + -
4 4
Helical, Bevel and
Worm Gears
. . (viii)
The torque on the worm shaft,
. . . (ix)
The resultant BM at mid section,
The area that resists bending stress due to M and shearing stress due to M,is the
core section of the worm whose diameter is the dedendum diameter of worm. This
is found from second of Eq. (1 1.37),
tan a = -ZI
4
From Eq. (1 1.36) in which a = 7' and zl = 1.
1
.. tan 7' = 0.123 = -
4
so that q = 8.144
d
m =- from Eq. (1 1.35)
4
Core area, = 2
A, = - =
dd = 7 (56.4)2 = 2498.32 mm2
4
P 5571
. Compressive stress, a, = - = = 2.23 ~ / m m ~ . . . (xii)
I A, 2498.32
Design of Power 3 2 M 32x295x103
Transmission Devices Bending stress, ob = -- = 16.75 N/mm2 . . . (xiii)
x d: x (56.41~
16M 1 6 x 1 3 . 7 x 1 0 ' = ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Shearing stress, T= = (xiv)
nd x (56.4)3
o(,and o, are direct stresses, hence, they may be added. The tensile stress
Figure 11.12
a, is in MPa.
The n~odule,nr, can be calculated from Helical, Bevel and
Worm Gears
In the above equations all quantities hdve been defined earlier. However, we repeat them
here for emphasis and you must note the units in which the quantities will go into
equations.
K = Design load factdr, product of Kc and Kd,
H2 = Power transmitted by worm wheel. (Note this power will be less than that at
worm shaft because of friction between worm thread and teeth of worm
gear), kW,
N2 = rpm of worm wheel,
Z2 = Number of teeth on worm wheel,
d
q = Number of modules in worm pitch diameter, i.e. q = - ,
m
D+d
A = Centre distance between worm and worm wheel, i.e. A = -m ,
2
a, = Surface stress in worm wheel tooth and worn1 thread, Pa,
ob= Bending stress in worm wheel tooth, Pa,
Y = Form factor for worm wheel, and
m = Axial module, m.
As in case of other gears, K is assumed to be 1.5. Yet note that Kd in case of worm and
worn1 wheel is much less because
(a) the contact between thread of worm and teeth of worm wheel never breaks,
and
I
iron both.
The permissible values of oband o, are given in Table 1 1.4.
Design of Power Table 11.4 :Permissible Surface Stress (a,) and Bending Stress (ab)
Transmission Devices
Material Condition all Permissible Stress a, and ab
(MPa) (MPa)
a, with Worm Reversed
Surface Hardness Bending
1 I Rc<45 I Rc>45
1 stress, a b * I
Tin Bronze Loam cast 180 145 145 36
Chill cast 250 200 243 52
Centrifugal cast 240 230 278 57
1 Tin Free
Bronze
Cast Iron
1 Loam cast
Chill cast
400
1 5 0 0 1
-
-
-
1 - 1 -
-
80
88 1
Loam cast 120 26
150 - - 30
180 - - 34
-
* Tabulated value is for reversed bending. In case of worm and worm wheel drive
the stress is pulsating. Hence, tabulated values are multiplied by 1.3, 1.2 and
1.4, respectively for 1 , 2 and 3.
Example 1 1.4
A worm and worm wheel drive is required to transmit 4.5 kW of power with
velocity ratio of 35. 'The driving shaft rotates at 950 rpm. The worm is made in
medium carbon steel which is heat treated to 50 R,. The wheel rim is made in tin
bronze with o,, = 250 MPa. Design worm wheel for zl = 1.
Solution
From Table 1 1.4, o, = 250 MPa is for tin bronze chill cast for which o, is read as
243 MPa for worm hardness of 50 R, > 45 R,. Also obfor reversed bending is read
as 52 MPa which will be 1.3 x 52 = 67.6 MP for pulsating bending.
Let us design worm gear for surface strength by using Eq. (1 1.47). We substitute
o, = 243 MPa, Hz= 4.5 kW, Z2= 35, K = 1.5, N2 = 27.143. Note that o is in MPa
in Eq. (1 1.47). Let us choose q = 10 (it can be chosen between 8 and 13).
m=-
2A = -2 x 2 0 2 = 8.97 say 9
q + Z 2 10+35
Hence, A is modified as
. . (i)
Then from Eq. (1 1.35), tlelical, Revel and
Worm Gears
. . . (ii)
The pitch diameter of wheel from
z
Helix angle a = tan-' from Eq. (1 1.36)
4
1
a = tan-' - = 5.71' . . . (iv)
10
For checking bending stress first calculate Y
. . . (iv)
or ob = 59.4 MPa
The permissible bending stress is 67.6 MPa. Hence, the gear is safe.
I
I
SAQ 3
(a) Discuss Kcand Kdfor worm and worm gear combination.
(b) What materials would you recommend for worm and worm wheel?
(c) Solve Example 1 1.2 of Section 1.8 for zl = 2 and q = 10, zl = 2 and q = 8.
(d) A worm and worm wheel drive with a velocity ratio of 25 transmits 10 kW
of power. The worm rotates at 1250 rpm. The worm wheel is made in tin
bronze, cast centrifugally to have following properties. o,= 3000 MPa,
06 = 81 MPa, o,= 279 MPa. Assume double start worm, and number of
module in worm pitch diameter, q = 10. Apply a factor of safety of 1.7 on
surface strength. Calculate centre distance, A , axial module, m, worm pitch
diameter, d, worm wheel pitch diameter, D and check if design is safe in
bending.
Design of Power
Transmission Devices 11.14 SUMMARY
Helical, bevel and worm gears have been considered for designing. Helical gear design IT
extended from previous unit. However, design load factor which is the product of load
concentration factor and dynamic load factor has been explained in detail. It is easier to
assume K = 1.5 at the initial stage and calculate dimensions of gear and then calculate
peripheral velocity and find Kc and Kd. The design will be acceptable if Kc x Kd is less
than 1.5. The bevel gear design formulae, like those for straight tooth and helical spur
gears have also been developed for surface strength (compressive) and against bending.
The permissible bending stress is consideration, fatigue strength reduction factor for
stress concentration and a factor of safety which depends upon material and heat
treatment. These factors have been tabulated. The ultimate surface strength which is
compressive is related to surface hardness like the ultimate tensile strength. A factor of
safety of 1.7 should be applied on surface strength calculated from hardness.
The geometrical difference between worm and worm wheel and other gears has been
discussed. The various loads that act upon worm and worm wheel have been calculated.
The worn1 is designed as shaft of diameter which is core diameter, dd. On the shaft the '
direct, bending and shearing stresses are considered. The worm gear is designed as other
gears.
The design of gear is made such that it is safe both under surface strength and against
bending. The load on gears is varying hence fatigue considerations are must. We can
calculate centre distance and then module from consideration of surface strength anld then
check if gear is safe under bending. Or we can calculate module from consideratiorl of
bending stress, then centre distance and check for surface stress. American Gear
Manufacturer's Association (AGMA) recommends to assume module and check against
both surface and bending strengths.
A =- m, Z p + ,Zw -
3
- . 3 5 + 1 1 2 = 230 mm . . . (i)
cos p ' 2 cos '
6 30' 2
2n N p dp Helical, Bevel and
Peripheral speed v = -- Worm Gears
60 ' 2
. . . (iii)
Assume that bearings are arranged symmetrically near gears. Then from
Table 11.3 Kc for vP= 0.64 is found by interpolation between vP= 0.6 and
w,,= 0.8.
. . . (iv)
The surface strength = 2.6 BHN = 2.6 x 187.7 = 488.28 MPa working
surface stress in less than surface strength giving a factor of safety
. . (vii)
From Eq. ( I 1.1 1) bending stress in tooth
Design of Power 1.036 x 7
Transmission Devices . o = 4790.3 x- I pa
950 x 39.7 x 23.3 x (0.003)' 0.125
= 1 1552969.72 Pa = 1 I .5 MPa
From Table 10.15 for forged, normalised arid hardened steel n = 1.5,
K, = 1.8.
o c = = 545 MPa
1.67
Velocity ratio of the drive
i=tanvw=5
:. y ~ , = t a n - ' 5 = 7 8 . 7 ~ , y ~ , 90-78.7=11.3°
, . . . (i)
We propose to design gears on surface strength and check its safety in
bending. Hence, use Eq. (1 1.30)
1.5 x 25
:. L = 10.9 x lo4 x 5 (25 + I)?
'[ 5 x 1000 (4.5)' (54q2 x 1 0 ' ~
which is standard.
:. d , = nz ,, Z p = 6.00 x 20 = 120 mm . . . (iv)
d,,, = d,
i I:1 - - = 6.00 1 - - = 540 mm
O f ,
. . . (v)
d,,,, = d
[ ] I-- =I20 I--
( Of::
=108mm . . . (vi)
. . . (vii)
Y for 20 teeth,
2A 2x294
Axial module, m = -= -- 9.8 mm say 10 mm ...
q + Z 2 10+50
7410 x 1.5 x 10
Ob = Pa = 34 MPa
10 x 50 x (0.01)~50 x 0.131
which is less than permissible bending stress of 8 1 MPa. Hence, safe.
d =rnq=lOxl0=100mm . . . (iii)
D = 2 A - d = 2 x 300- 100 = 500 mm . . . (iv)
FURTHER READING
Vallence and Doughtie (1943), Design of Machine Members, McGraw-Hill Company.
Movnin and Goldziker (1966), Machine Design, Mir Publishers.
Dobrovolsky, Zablonsky, Mak, Radchik, Erlikh (1966), Machine Design, Foreign
Language Publishing House, Moscow.
Norton (2000), Machine Design, Pearson Education.
Shigley (1986), Mechanical Engineering Design, McGraw-Hill Con~pany.
Abdul Mubeen (2005), Machine Design, Khanna Publishers.