WIA1001 GROUP PROJECT EVALUATION

Scoring Sheet

Max Scores
Assessment Criteria Comments
Score Earned

GROUP NO:- ___ GROUP MEMBERS:

1. Team Work Skill (Refer to Rubric 1) 20

2. Critical Thinking & Problem Solving Skill (Refer to Rubric

20
2)

3. Communication Skill (Refer to Rubric 3) 20

4. Report (Refer to template) 20

5. Oral Presentation (Refer to guideline) 20

TOTAL 100

20%
Rubric 1 - Team Work Skill: Peer Assessment Rubric
The assessment will be peer evaluation where every member in a team will evaluate his/her peers in the same team.
Levels
Score

TS1 (KIM) TS2 (KIM) TS3 (KIM) TS4 TS5

Working with Others
 Almost always listens to, 
shares with, and supports
the efforts of others.
4  Tries to keep people
working well together.
Taking responsibility Attitude Contributions Focus on the Task
Performs all tasks very  Is never publicly critical of  Routinely provides useful,  Consistently stays focused
effectively; attends all the project or the work of well-developed and on the task and what
meetings and participates others. clearly expressed ideas needs to be done.
enthusiastically; very when participating in the
 Always has a positive  Very self-directed.
reliable. group project discussion.
attitude about the task(s).
 A leader who contributes
a lot of effort.

 Usually listens to, shares,  Performs all assigned  Is rarely publicly critical of  Usually provides useful  Focuses on the task and
with, and supports the tasks; attends meetings the project or the work of ideas when participating what needs to be done
efforts of others. regularly and usually others. in the group project most of the time.
3 participates effectively; discussion.
 Does not cause "waves" in  Often has a positive  Other group members can
generally reliable.
the group. attitude about the task(s).  A strong group member count on this person.
who tries hard!

 Often listens to, shares
with, and supports the
efforts of others.
 Sometimes is not a good
2 team member.
 Performs assigned tasks 
but needs many
reminders; attends
meetings regularly but
generally does not say
 Usually has a positive
anything constructive;
sometimes expects others
to do his/her work.
Is occasionally publicly
critical of the project or
the work of other
members of the group.
attitude about the task(s).
 Sometimes provides some  Focuses on the task and
ideas, but not well what needs to be done
developed, and not clearly some of the time.
expressed when
 Other group members
participating in the group
must sometimes nag,
project discussion.
urge, and remind to keep
 A satisfactory group this person on task.
member who does what is
required.

 Rarely listens to, shares  Does not perform  Is often publicly critical of  Rarely provides useful,  Rarely focuses on the task
with, and supports the assigned tasks; often the project or the work of relevant ideas or no and what needs to be
efforts of others. misses meetings and, other group members. suitable suggestions when done.
relies on others to do the participating in the group
1  Often is not a good team  Is often negative about  Let others do the work.
work. and in classroom
player. the task(s).
discussion.
 May refuse to participate.
Rubric 2 - Critical Thinking & Problem Solving Skill: Assessment Rubric
Levels CTPS1 (KIM)
Score
Identifies & Summarizes the
Problem
 Accurately identifies the 
problem and provides a
well-developed summary.
4 analyze and evaluate
 Accurately identifies the
problem and provides a
brief summary.
3 discussions.
 Identifies the problem
and provides a poor
summary or identifies an
2 inappropriate problem.
 Does not identify or
summarize the problem
1 accurately if at all.
CTPS2 (KIM)
Demonstrates
Thinking Skills
Able to evidently develop 
and improve thinking
skills such as to explain,
discussions.
 Able to feasibly develop  Able to feasibly
and improve thinking
skills such as to explain,
analyze and evaluate
Able to partially develop  Able to partially find ideas 
and improve thinking skills
such as to explain, analyze
and evaluate discussions.
 Unable to develop any  Unable to find any ideas.
thinking skill.
CTPS3 (KIM) CTPS5
CTPS4
Finding Ideas and Ability to Assess Quality of
Ability Think Out of the Box
Alternative Solution Supporting Data
Able to evidently  Able to evidently  Provides a well-developed
demonstrate good ideas demonstrate imaginative examination of the evidence
and good alternative and creative thinking. and questions its accuracy,
relevance, and
solution.
completeness.
 Clearly distinguishes
between fact and opinion.
 Able to feasibly  Examines evidence and
demonstrate ideas and demonstrate free thinking questions the quality.
alternative solution. not bound by old, non-
 Distinguishes between
functional, or limiting
structures, rules or
fact and opinion.
practices.
Able to partially think  Merely repeats
and alternative solution. freely, not bound by old, information provided.
non-functional, or limiting
 Does not justify position
structures, rules or
or distinguish between
practices.
fact and opinion.
 Unable to neither think  Does not identify or
freely, not bound by old, assess the quality of
non-functional, or limiting supporting evidence.
structures, rules or
practices.
Rubric 3 - Communication Skill: Assessment Rubric
Levels
Score
CS1 (KIM)
Introduction
 Creative attention getting 
strategy captures listeners’
attention to introduce the
topic. It is relevant to the
topic and clearly gains the
4 desired response from the
audience.
 Credibility was established
by speaker.
CS2 (KIM) CS3 (KIM) CS4 CS5
Delivery Content of Presentation Organization Use of Technology
Delivery, projection, and  Major items covered with  Effective organization well  Visual aids/multimedia
appearance are supporting data that suited to purpose. were carefully prepared
acceptably good. includes specificity, and supported the
 Main points are clearly
accuracy, and relevance. presentation effectively
distinct from supporting
by adding impact and
details.
interest.
 Graceful transitions create
coherent progress toward
conclusion.

 Effective strategy to  Delivery, projection, and  Major items covered but  Clear organizational  Visual aids/multimedia
capture listeners’
appearance acceptable. supporting data lacks pattern. were prepared and
attention. Adequate
specificity, accuracy, or supported the
introduction of the topic.  Main points are distinct
3  Credibility was established
relevance.
from supporting details.
presentation effectively.
by the speaker.  Smooth transitions
differentiate key points.

 Use of attention getting  Delivery, projection (pace,  Partially include  General  Visual aids/multimedia
strategy, but did not seem volume, and enunciation), supporting data, and data structure/organization partially supported the
to adequately capture and appearance (attire and presentation and reinforced
presented was relevant seems adequate.
audience attention and/ or demeanor) are partially the spoken message.
and accurate.
lead to desired outcome. acceptable.  Difference between main
2  Credibility was implied. points and supporting
details is blurred.
 Logical flow, but no clear
signposts for transitions.

 No attention getting  Delivery, projection (pace,  No supporting data, or  Lack of structure. Ideas  Visual aids/multimedia
strategy was evident. No
volume, and enunciation), data presented was are not coherent. were neither not used or
clear or relevant
and appearance (attire irrelevant or inaccurate. were largely ineffective or
connection to topic or  No transitions.
1 speech purpose.
and demeanor) appeared to have not
completely unacceptable.  Difficult to identify been prepared.
 No credibility was introduction, body, and
established. conclusion.
Report Template

Choice A – IS in Organisations Length Score

(i) Title of Project - -
(ii) Nature of the business/organisation 2-3
4
(source of ideas, the process) pages
(iii) Description of the existing IS systems 2-3
 types of application, pages
 the main users,
3
 type of input and output data,
 types of report generated,
 how it benefits organization)
(iv) Problems with the existing IS system 2-3
3
/limitations pages
(v) Improvements on the existing IS system/ 3-4
4
Description of problem to be solved pages
(vi) The innovativeness of the solution 2-3
 New business process pages 4
improvement
(vii) References & any additional beneficial 1-2
2
information. pages

Presentation Guideline
(i) Present your mock-up solution, detailing how your solution solve the identified problem.
(ii) Whatever appears in report should not appear again in the presentation.
(iii) Able to grab audience attention during your compelling presentation.
(iv) 10 minutes presentation + 5 minutes Q&A.