Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(2015) 209-220
ABSTRACT: Subjugation of women is an open choice for all women who are caught
in patriarchy and choose to accept their lot planned for them by male-dominated society.
Silence that characterizes the identity of a female character leads her towards anguish
and as a result her personality shatters. For a woman to seek self-actualisation, she
needs to break her silence to express herself. The present research paper is a comparative
study of the issue of self-actualisation in women in Margaret Atwood’s The
Handmaid’s Tale and Monica Ali’s Brick Lane. The study explores that how gender
roles are defined everywhere in the whole world irrespective of region or country and how
do the victimised perpetuate their oppression when they do not raise their voice against
the injustice. It is a qualitative research. Theoretical framework of the study is Hooks’
feminist theory. Hooks challenges patriarchal assumptions about women and affirms
that gender roles are not natural but cultural constructs. The mode of comparative study
is textual analysis of the selected excerpts from both the texts The findings of the
textual analysis are that protagonists of both the works have quest for self-actualisation
which is reflected in the characters’ inner turmoil beneath social conformity.
conspicuous writers who have represented female voice are Jane Austen,
Mary Woll-stonecraft, Olive Schreiner, Virginia Woolf, Simone de Beauvoir,
John Stuart Mill, Desai: and Bapsi Sidhwa.
As the present study deals with the works of Margaret Atwood and
Monica Ali, the literature review is narrowed down to the contemporary
criticism on the writings of the two authors. The literature review comprises
reviews of contemporary criticism on the writings of Margaret Atwood’s The
Handmaid’s Tale and Monica Ali’s Brick Lane.
Reddy (2011) has penned down Atwood’s philosophy of the survival
of the weak against the strong with dignity. She affirms that Atwood’s
protagonists are always victimised and are at war with their society, authority
or social circumstances. Her female characters are presented as human beings
with merits and demerits and they cannot be the embodiment of the moral
perfection which is the demand of society. Her novels, especially The
Handmaid’s Tale, depict “the woman caught in oppressive stereotypes and
they show how some women struggle to create a female space for
themselves” (p. 8).
Kouhestani (2012) has commented on the world of The Handmaid’s
Tale as a dystopian society where women are marginalised, sexually abused
and made docile by men. They have no rights to control their life but men as
they are superior to women. In this totalitarian regime, “Women lost all their
rights in life, even the right to their own bodies; they were picked out by the
regime to function as handmaids for rich families, with no right to object or
choose” (p. 132). But somehow, Offred presented her story to the world and
found her power and freedom with it.
Highlighting the oppression of women in Atwood’s novel, Porfert
(2014) has presented subjugation of women as a form of sexual slavery. The
politicians in Gilead exploited the environment to attain power over others
with oils, chemicals and nuclear products etc. which affected their own lives
also in making them and the land barren. “Essentially, men raped the Earth
until it could not be raped any longer, so they turned their attention to raping
women instead” (p. 3). Women are not allowed to read or write as they are
not considered intellectuals. They are supposed to bear and rear children and
look after household affairs. “Women in that society are not people at all;
instead, they are simply walking wombs. Everything that happens in The
Handmaid’s Tale has a precedent in history or has begun to emerge as a trend
in human history; therefore, this story should serve as a warning and as a
wake-up call to the dangers to which our society could fall prey in the near
future” (p. 15).
212 M. Hayat, T. Maqbool, S. Akhter / ELF Annual Research Journal 17 (2015) 209-220
obeyed otherwise they will eat them. “Gilead, at bottom, is a vampiric realm,
a society sick with blood” (Bloom, 2009, p. 2). But there was a ray of hope
that if they would be lured by the handmaids, they might help the handmaids
in their escape.
The guards weren’t allowed inside the building except when called,
and we weren’t allowed out, except for our walks,… around the
football field, which was enclosed by a chain link fence topped with
barbed wire… They were objects of fear to us, but of something
else as well. If only they would look. If only we could talk to them.
Something could be exchanged, we thought, some deal made, some
tradeoff, we still had our bodies. That was our fantasy. (Margarate,
1996, p.2)
The introductory scene makes us ready for militia rule of
fundamentalists in United States renamed as Gilead. In this post-war regime,
the men and women are assigned various roles. In the dearth of resources
and man power, men need to propagate the white race for which they make
women their handmaids. Offred is one of the handmaids who are trained for
this job at a high-school gymnasium and are kept under strict discipline. This
world can rightly be called a dystopian world presented in the novel. Moylan
says that “dystopian narrative is largely the product of the terrors of the
twentieth century”, (in Tolan, 2007, p.148). In substantiation of Moylan’s
notion of dystopian narrative, Tolan (2007) says “The Handmaid’s Tale is
certainly grounded in contemporary fears and preoccupations” (p.148). The
men of the lower ranks who are their guards exchange looks with them but
they can either shoot them if any handmaid tries to escape her bondage or
help her escape. In this ambivalent scenario, there is no system of rights and
duties. No harmony and equilibrium is present in this society. This extreme
situation is agonising for women.
In Brick Lane, we see that the anxiety of Nazneen is similar to that of
the Handmaid. Both are kept in a restricted environment where they are
bound to obey their male supervisors by negating their selves. In Brick Lane,
Nazneen is shown as a dumb lady who is forced to do what her society and
her husband allow her to do and she is helpless to utter a single word against
it. She is forced to get what is made available to her within four walls by her
husband according to his accord only. Living in British society, Chanu,
Nazneen’s husband, yearns for Bangladeshi culture and traditions and asks
his wife for sticking to their religious norms. “He does not allow his wife to
go alone along the streets” (Ahmed, 2010, p. 173). He does not like that his
wife should mingle with strangers outside their house.
She was free to wish it but it would never be. She did not often go
out. Why should you go out? Said Chanu. If you go out ten people
A Feminist Study of Self-Actualisation in Atwood and Ali 215
opinions and makes her feel important. However, despite this renewed
interest in life and faith in her abilities, Nazneen faces a conflict between her
loyalty to her matrimonial bond and her love for Karim. She is confused that
either she is the architect of her new life or it is the decree of fate as she has
been taught by her mother that lives of women are fated. Nazneen expresses
this intellectual crisis in the following words:
If ever her life was out of her hands, it was now. She had submitted
to her father and married her husband; she had submitted to her
husband. And now she gave herself up to power greater than these
two, and she felt herself helpless before it. When the thought crept
into her mind that power was inside her, that she was its creator,
she dismissed it as conceited. How could such a weak woman
unleash a force so strong? She gave it to fate not to herself. (Ali,
2003, pp. 299- 300)
Nazneen resolves the conflict by rejecting the belief that lives of women are
fated and she decides to live independent of men and male-constructed
beliefs and assumptions about women. Finally, she decides neither to go back
to Bangladesh with her husband nor to marry Karim.
Hence, this is the process of quest for identity and self-actualisation
through which the female protagonists of both the novels have gone through
after critical encounters with men in their life.
Findings
The data analysis of both the novels, Margaret Atwood’s The
Handmaid’s Tale and Monica Ali’s Brick Lane, clearly indicates male
chauvinism in two different social setups. Atwood exhibits in her dystopian
novel a situation where females are categorized on the basis of their physical
capability to produce new generation. They are not even given their names,
instead they are recognized on the basis of their uniform and work capability.
On the other hand, Monica Ali’s Brick Lane is set in an Eastern background,
where the protagonist leaves her village after arranged marriage to reside in a
foreign land but she fails to leave the traces of her culture behind. In addition
to this, her husband keeps on asserting his authority on her in different ways.
Both the novels address the same issue of predefined female roles designed
for them to follow without taking their agreement or consent. Their suffering
and mental drudgery gradually lead them towards consciousness of their
situationand both start a thinking process to know about their place in
society and at home. Their awareness gives them courage to fight for their
rights. Offred successfully flees from the Gileadean society and Nazneen
becomes brave enough to live in a Western society without her husband.
This comparative study gives a sort of validation to the fact that female
negation and then female struggle for self-identification and self-actualisation
A Feminist Study of Self-Actualisation in Atwood and Ali 219
is not the problem of only one society or culture but it is penetrated into all
the societies and cultures of the world.
Conclusion
The comparative study of the two works establishes that women-
oppression is a universal phenomenon if women uncritically submit to the
roles assigned to them by male-oriented culture. The study reveals that both
the protagonists undergo emotional and psychological agony that stems from
gender discrimination. Although Offred and Nazneen are performing their
allotted roles yet peace of mind and happiness have disappeared from their
life. They try to seek self-fulfilment and happiness through resignation to the
norms of male oriented world but the drive for self-actualisation remains
unquenched. Finally, they demand a voice of their own through financial and
social autonomy which is reflected through Offred’s rejection of her role of a
handmaid and Nazneen’s rejection of male patronage in her life. So it is
proved that freedom from male oppression and gender discrimination can
only be materialized if women challenge their assigned roles and realise that
they need to be the architects of their own destiny. There is no way towards
redemption of women from the mechanisms of patriarchy except female
self-actualisation.
220 M. Hayat, T. Maqbool, S. Akhter / ELF Annual Research Journal 17 (2015) 209-220
References
Ahmed, E. A. M. (2010). East meets west: Gender and cultural difference in
the work of Ahdaf Soueif, Farhana Sheikh and Monica Ali. (Doctoral dissertation).
Retrieved on 15-02-2015 from http://orca.cf.ac.uk/54113/1/U514065.
Ali, M. (2003). Brick lane. London: Routledge Publication
Anuradha, S. (2015). Social marginality in Sashi Deshpande’s That long
silence. International Research Journal of Humanities, Engineering &
Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2, 17-20.
Atwood, M. (2003). The handmaid’s tale. Canada: McClelland and Stewart
Bloom, H. (2009). Bloom’s modern critical views: Margaret Atwood. USA: Infobase
Publishing.
Dandan, Y. (2010). The embodiment of racism in Brick Lane by Monica Ali. Retrieved on
20-4-2015 fromhttp://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:397184/fulltext01.pdf
Deshpande, S.(1988).That long silence. New Delhi: Penguin
Desi, A. (1963). Cry, the peacock. India: P.Owen
Hooks, B. (1982). Ain’t I a woman: Black women and feminism. London: Pluto Press.
Hooks, B. (2000). Feminism is for everybody: Passionate politics. Feminism is for
everybody: Passionate politics. Cambridge, MA: South End press
Hooks, B. (2000). Where we stand: Class matters. New York: Routledge.
Kouhestani, M. (2012). Sexual oppression and religious extremism in
Margaret Atwood’s the Handmaid’s tale. International Proceedings of
Economics Development and Research, 56, 129-133.
Mortada, S. S. (2010). The notion of women as bearers of culture in Monica
Ali’s Brick Lane. Retrieved on 20-04-2015 from
http://dspace.bracu.ac.bd/bitstream/handle/10361/895/Mortada.pdf?sequence=1
Noufal, M. (2014). Re-Orientalising the orient: A Critique of Monica Ali’s
Brick Lane. Retrieved on 19-04-2015from
http://ijellh.com/papers/2014/September/45-448-455- sept-2014.pdf
Porfert, J. (2014). Hell on Earth: The feminist dystopia of The Handmaid’s
Tale. Retrieved on 15-02-2015 from
http://al.odu.edu/english/pubspdfs/Joseph-Porfert-essay.pdf
Reddy, P. M. (2011). The Handmaid’s tale: The carving out of feminist space
in Margaret Atwood’s novel. The Criterion: An International Journal in
English, 2(4), 284-299.
Sidhwa, B. (2014). The bride. Lahore: Ilqa Publications.
Somacarrera, P. (2006). Power politics: power and identity. In C. A. Howells
(Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Margaret Atwood (pp. 43-57). New York:
Cambridge University Press.
Tolan, F. (2007). Margaret Atwood: Feminism and fiction. New York: Rodopi
B.V.
Woolf, V. (1927). To the light house. England: Hogarth Press.