Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Philosophy of Assessment
Megan Lambeth
North Carolina State University
Philosophy of Assessment Assignment Megan Lambeth
Assessments, tests, quizzes, exams. Tracking a student's progress, based on what they
have learned in a class can result in various names such as those mentioned. No matter what they
are called, it is important for a teacher to use them in order to examine the strengths and
weaknesses of his/her students regarding the subject at hand. Assessments are a normal
honors, or A.P. class, I can guarantee either a formative, common, or summative assessment will
stay in line with what you are expecting students to learn and retain throughout your course. The
following, are the qualities of my own philosophy of assessment and I will be expanding upon
each one: there should be a cycle of assessment, assessing should occur throughout the school
year and collected, assessments should not be biased, created assessments should align with their
intended unit, and assessments should not dismiss diverse needs or diverse learners.
I believe that there should be a cycle of assessment within the classroom that follows the
following pattern: Plan, Assess, Analyze, and Improve (Missouri). The first process of an
assessment cycle is to plan the learning outcomes and objectives that will be covered during a
unit. The learning objectives and outcomes chosen should follow the Bloom’s Taxonomy
pyramid of remember, understand, apply, analyze, evaluate, and create. Secondly, I believe that
the cycle of assessment should assess those planned learning outcomes and objectives created for
the unit. This will be accomplished during the instructional time of the class period and can
either be pursued through direct or indirect teaching methods (formative, common, or summative
assessments). The third step of the assessment cycle is the analysis of student results from the
previous stage. Being thorough in the investigation of students’ work, will insure that the
Philosophy of Assessment Assignment Megan Lambeth
preceding cycle level is carried out to its fullest potential. Last, but not least, improving the
learning objectives and outcomes to better align students’ strengths and weaknesses is crucial for
the assessment cycle to be complete. Without improvements of the unit and lessons the students
will continue to perform poorly on the assessments. (Wormeli, pg. 35-36, 2006)
I believe that by collecting assessments throughout the year, I will have a better
understanding of how my students process and learn information and how to improve my
teaching methods based on this information. By doing so, both current and future students will
benefit. Current students will have a measurement of their skills in units throughout the semester,
which in return can be a guide of their strengths and weaknesses for a final summative
assessment at the closing of the year. Whereas, future students will benefit from improved
teaching methods made from the errors in assessments given throughout the previous school year
(Wormeli, pg. 41-42, 2006). By adjusting my teaching methods and instructional information, I
can provide differentiated learning to my students as a support in areas that I failed to assist in
before. Staying consistent to bad habits will only hinder my students and I, therefore, must be
open to the idea of learning new ways to expand upon my teaching techniques.
I believe that assessments should not be biased towards wrong answers, causing utmost
how far they have come in a particular area and where constructive feedback of improvements
should be made (Wormeli, pg. 100, 2006). Although a student may miss three out of five
questions on an assessment, they are not at a total loss. Their score still shows that they were
successful on two of the five questions, providing no excuse to a student that their results were
completely inadequate. I can then use this as an opportunity to help the student reach their full
Philosophy of Assessment Assignment Megan Lambeth
potential through the assistance of differentiated learning. Providing the right amount of support,
for that particular student, is crucial for them to lift their chin up and persevere through the
struggling time.
I believe in creating assessments that appropriately align with the material and
information being presented during class instruction. To insure that the material covered within
an assessment aligns with the learning objectives and outcomes discussed in the unit lessons,
common assessments should be the first assignment created. By doing so, I am able to construct
the lesson topics, as well as the formative assessment activities, to fit the goal of the common
unit assessment. This also allows students to be aware of the expectations for a unit and therefore
be more prepared for the common unit assessment in the end (Wormeli, pg. 21, 2006). It is also
crucial that, as a teacher, I do not go above and beyond the level of my students on an
regular academic classroom level for assessment questions, regular academic students will not be
Lastly, I believe that assessments should provide equity among all learners in the
classroom, despite their diverse needs and/or learning method. No matter a child’s learning or
physical disability, the assessments in which they take should always be modified or provide
accommodations as a means of support. I must be fair to all of my students, even if that means
the assessment for a student with a learning or physical disability is different from that of a
regular education student. All in all, an assessment is a measurement of the knowledge a student
has of mathematical concepts and skills and not how the student came to process that knowledge
Citations:
https://www.missouristate.edu/assessment/89380.htm
Wake County Public School System. (n.d.). NEW, 10-POINT GRADING SCALE GOES
Wormeli, R. (2006). Fair Isn’t Always Equal: Assessing and Grading in the Differential