You are on page 1of 322

Design Calculation ICT Cover

DESIGN OF ABUTMENT (A1) WITH


OPEN FOUNDATION

FOR MINOR BRIDGE AT


CHAINAGE- 111+735

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/1 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Index

INDEX

Sr. No. Items

1 Input Data

2 Seismic Coeff. Calculation

3 Force Calculation Due to Earth Pressure

4 Stability of Foundation

5 Design of Foundation

6 Abutment Shaft Design

7 Design of Dirt Wall

8 Design of Return Wall

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/2 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Index

Page No.

1-7

8-9

10-18

19-32

33-49

50-63

64-63

64-68

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/3 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT cover (2)

DESIGN OF RCC WALL TYPE ABUTMENT WITH OPEN


FOUNDATION

INDEX

Sr. No. Items Page No.


1 Input Data 1-6

2 Seismic Coeff. Calculation 7-7

3 Earth Pressure Calculation 8-15

3 Earth Pressure Calculation 8-15

4 Stability of Foundation 16-23

5 Design of Foundation 24-31

6 Servicibility Check of Foundation 32-34

7 Design of Wall 35-41

8 Servicibility Check of Wall 42-43

9 Summary of Result 44-44

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/4 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT INPUT

Details of Superstructure:

Skew Angle of Bridge = 0 Degree =

Radius of Curvature of Superstructure = 0


Design speed of vehicle = 100

Right Dimensions
Span -c/c of Brg. = 40.000m
Thickness of Expansion Joint = 0.000m
Slab projection Beyond C/L of Bearing (Back Side) = 0.750m
Slab projection Beyond C/L of Bearing (Span Side) = 0.750m
Span -c/c of E.J. = 41.500m

Type of Superstructure = T-Beam with Slab


Width of Crash barrier (Both Side) = 0.450m
Width of Carriageway = 8.500m
Projection beyond crash barrier = 0.050m
Thickness of Wearing coat = 0.065m
Length of Approach Slab ( Right) = 0.000m
Kerb Shyness = 0.500m
Width of Footpath on one side = 1.500m
Railing/kerb on footpath edge = 0.500m
Total Width of Superstructure = 12.500m
Median Width minus 20mm gap = 0.000m

Type of Soil = 1

NBC of soil -Normal Case = 400


SBC of soil-Normal Case = 484
SBC of soil-Seismic Case = 605

Coeff. of friction between concrete and soil = 0.7

Permissible FOS against Sliding = 1


= 1
Permissible FOS against Overturning = 1

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/5 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT INPUT

= 1

Abutment- Wall Type


Thickness of Abutment = 1.500m
Width of abutment shaft = 12.500m
Thickness of Abutment shaft at Top = 1.500m
Thickness of Abutment shaft at HFL = 1.254m
Thickness of Abutment shaft at Bottom = 1.200m

Solid Return Wall


Length of Return wall = 5.800m
Thickness of Return wall at Top = 0.650m
Thickness of Return wall at Bottom = 0.650m

Cantilever Return Wall


Height of Return Wall-Free edge = 0.600m
Height of wall at abutment = 2.667m
Length of Return wall = 4.000m
Thickness of Return wall at Top = 0.650m
Thickness of Return wall at Bottom = 0.650m

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/6 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT INPUT

Foundation
Along Traffic Direction:
Total Width of Footing = 14.500m
abutment pedestal width = 1.200m
abutment pedestal Height = 0.000m
Width of Toe Slab = 6.800m
Width of Heel Slab = 6.500m
Thickness of Toe slab at tip = 0.700m
Thickness of Toe slab near shaft = 2.500m
Thickness of heel slab at tip = 0.700m
Thickness of heel slab near shaft = 2.500m
Width of backfill on heel slab = 6.500m
Thickness of heel slab at back fill edge = 2.500m
Height of back fill at bottom edge of heel slab = 17.021m
Height of back fill at back fill edge of heel slab = 15.221m
Across Traffic Direction:
Width of foundation -Uniform portion = 12.500m
Width of foundation -Tapering portion = 12.500m

Levels

Deck Level at Median Edge= 753.500m Cross Slope (Uni-direction


Deck level at Outer Edge = 753.213m Height of Superstructure
Deck level at center line = 753.356m Min. Height of Footpath Sid
Soffit Level at center of bridge = 749.291m Height of Pedestal (2)
Abutment cap top level = 749.210m Height of Pedestal (3)
Abutment cap bottom lvl (uniform portion ends) = 748.910m Height of Pedestal (4)
Abutment cap bottom lvl (corbel portion ends) = 748.610m Height of Pedestal (5)
Abutment shaft top level = 748.610m Height of Pedestal (6)
Ground level/LBL = 744.000m Distance of nearest girder t
Abutment shaft bottom level = 738.135m (Refusal levelHeight (Avg.) of Dirt Wall
Foundation level = 735.635m Abutment shaft Above G.L
HFL = 740.010m Abutment Shaft below G.L
Height of abutment shaft
MSL
Wedge over girder flange

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/7 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT INPUT

Material Specification
Concrete Grade = M
Characteristic compressive strength of concrete,fck = 40.00
Design Compressive strength of Concrete, fcd = 17.87
Tensile strength of concrete , fctm = 3.03
Strain at reaching Characteistic Strength, ec2 = 0.02
Ultimate Strain, ecu2 = 0.035
Ecm = 33345.764

Steel Grade = Fe
Yield Strength of Reinforcement, fy or fyk = 500
Design Yield Strength of Reinforcement, fyd = 434.78
Modulus of Elasticity of Steel ( Es) = 200000.00

Dry weight of Concrete = 25


Dry unit weight of soil = 20
Permissible Crack Width = 0.3

Maximum compressive stress in concrete under rare = 0.48 fck


combination
= 19.2

Maximum tensile stress in steel under rare combination = 300

Creep Coefficient
For Abutment Shaft = 1.2
For Footing = 1.2

Clear Cover to Reinforcement


Earth Face = 75
Non-Earth Face = 50

Seismic Data:
Seismic Zone = 5
Z =Zone factor = 0.36
I =Importance factor = 1.2
R =Response Reduction factor = 3
= 1

Properties of backfill material :

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/8 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT INPUT

c = 0
f = 30
q = 90
b = 0
d = 20.0

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/9 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT INPUT

0.000 Radians COS θ = 1.000


SIN θ = 0.000

m
kmph

Right Dimensions Skew Dimensions


+ 40.000m
0.000m
0.750m
0.750m
41.50m

T-Beam with Slab

0.000m

Hard or Rocky Strata

kN/m2
(as per geotechnical report)
kN/m2
kN/m2

for weathered rock

Normal Case
Seismic Case
Normal Case

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/10 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT INPUT

Seismic Case

12.500m
1.500m
1.254m
1.200m

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/11 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT INPUT

(skew dimension)
(skew dimension)

Cross Slope (Uni-directional) = 2.500%


Height of Superstructure = 4.000m
Min. Height of Footpath Side Pedestal (1) = 0.000m
Height of Pedestal (2) = 0.125m
Height of Pedestal (3) = 0.000m
Height of Pedestal (4) = 0.000m
Height of Pedestal (5) = 0.000m
Height of Pedestal (6) = 0.000m
Distance of nearest girder to c.l. of deck = 2.750m
Height (Avg.) of Dirt Wall = 4.146m
Abutment shaft Above G.L = 4.610m
Abutment Shaft below G.L = 5.865m
Height of abutment shaft = 10.475m
= 738.635m
Wedge over girder flange = 0.0250m

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/12 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT INPUT

40
Mpa at 28 days
Mpa at 28 (0.67/1.5 * fck)
MPa

N/mm2

500D (HYSD Steel)


Mpa
Mpa (1/1.15 * fy)
Mpa

kN/m3
kN/m3
mm - For Moderate Exposure Condition

N/mm2

N/mm2

for 365 days


for 365 days

mm
mm

in Longitudinal direction
In Transverse direction

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/13 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT DL+SIDL+LL Calc

REACTION FROM SUPERSTRUCTURE (in kN)

Dist between c.g of Bearing and c.g. of abutment shaft =


Dist between c.g of superstructure and c.g. of abutment shaft =
C.G. of crash barrier above deck level =

From Superstructure analysis


Dead Load 1425 eT
DL Reaction on Bearing No.-1 = 1126.926 4.125
DL Reaction on Bearing No.-2 = 1276.346 1.375
DL Reaction on Bearing No.-3 = 1276.346 -1.375
DL Reaction on Bearing No.-4 = 1126.926 -4.125
DL Reaction on Bearing No.-5 = 0.00 0.00
DL Reaction on Bearing No.-6 = 0.00 0.00
4806.54 0.000
Super Imposed Dead Load Reactions ( Excluding Wearing Course )
SIDL Reaction on Bearing No.-1 = 113.022 4.125
SIDL Reaction on Bearing No.-2 = 31.881 1.375
SIDL Reaction on Bearing No.-3 = 31.881 -1.375
SIDL Reaction on Bearing No.-4 = 113.022 -4.125
SIDL Reaction on Bearing No.-5 = 0.000 0.000
SIDL Reaction on Bearing No.-6 = 0.000 0.000
289.81 0.000

Reaction Due to Wearing Course only


SIDL Reaction on Bearing No.-1 = 288.378 4.125
SIDL Reaction on Bearing No.-2 = 128.808 1.375
SIDL Reaction on Bearing No.-3 = 128.808 -1.375
SIDL Reaction on Bearing No.-4 = 288.378 -4.125
SIDL Reaction on Bearing No.-5 = 0.000 0.000
SIDL Reaction on Bearing No.-6 = 0.000 0.000
834.37 0.000

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/14 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT DL+SIDL+LL Calc

0.000m in longitudinal direction


0.000m in Transverse direction
0.449m

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/15 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Volume

VOLUME CALCULATION
C.G. Of Footing = 7.250 m
C.G. Of shaft from toe tip = 7.400 m
Distance between c.g. of shaft and footing = -0.150 m

Description No. LENGTH WIDTH

m m
Dirt Wall -Uniform portion 1 12.50 0.000
-Trapering portion 1 12.50 0.300
Bracket (Rectangle) 1 12.50 0.300
(Corbel) 0.5 1 12.50 0.300
Cap (uniform portion) 1 12.50 0.000
12.50 0.000
Cap (Corbel Portion) 1
12.50 0.000
Shaft above HFL 1 12.50 1.377
Shaft below HFL 1 12.50 1.227
Solid Return Wall 2 5.80 0.650
Cantilever Return wall( Rectangular portion) 2 4.00 0.650
Cantilever Return wall( Traingular portion) 2 4.00 0.650
Footing
Heel Slab 1 12.50 6.500
Toe Slab 1 12.50 6.800
Portion between Heel and Toe 1 12.50 1.200

Back filling above HFL over Heel Slab 1 12.50 6.500


Back filling below HFL over Heel Slab 1 12.50 6.500
Backfill above Heel slab 1 12.50 6.500
Front Filling over Toe Slab 1 12.50 6.800
Front Filling over Toe Slab in HFL Case 1 12.50 6.800
Side filling between heel and toe 1 0.00 1.200
Aproach Slab 1 12.500 1.750
Back fill above HFL on flared portion of stem 0 12.50 -0.246
Back fill below HFL on flared portion of stem 0 12.50 -0.054

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/16 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Volume

RCC Railing/Parapet Wall Weight/Crash Barri 2 8 kN/m 1.750

SECTIONAL PROPERTIES

Width of Footing (B) = 14.50 m


Length of Footing (L) = 12.500 m

A = 14.500 x 12.500
ZL = 12.500 x 35.042
ZT = IT1 + IT2
distance of extreme point from centre
IT1 = 14.500 x 162.760
IT2 (moment of inertia of triangle ) = 14.500 x 0.000
from centre of footing = 0.000 m4

Moment of inertia of two triangle = 0.000 m4

Total moment of inertia = 2360.03 m4

Distance of extreme point from centre of footing = 6.250

Total Section modulus (ZT) = 377.604 m3

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/17 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Volume

Ecce.(eL) Ecce.(eL1)
Ecce.(eL2) Trans. Ecc
HEIGHT VOLUME @ abut. @ c.g.of
@ Toe (eT)
Shaft footing
m m^3 m m m
0.000 0.000 -0.750 -0.900 -8.150 0.000
0.000 0.002 -0.600 -0.750 -8.000 0.000
0.300 1.125 -0.900 -1.050 -8.300 0.000
0.300 0.563 -0.850 -1.000 -8.250 0.000
0.300 0.000 -0.750 -0.900 -8.150 0.000

0.300 0.000 -0.750 -0.900 -8.150 0.000

8.600 148.011 -0.090 -0.240 -7.490 0.000


1.175 18.019 -0.014 -0.164 -7.414 0.000
16.265 122.638 -3.500 -3.650 -10.900 0.000
0.600 3.120 -2.600 -2.750 -10.000 0.000
2.067 5.373 -1.933 -2.083 -9.333 0.000

1.600 130.000 -3.391 -10.641 0.000


1.600 136.000 3.213 -4.038 0.000
2.500 37.500 -0.150 -7.400 0.000

13.346 1084.383 -4.000 -11.250 0.000


2.775 225.469 -4.351 -11.601 0.000
16.121 1309.852 -4.060 -11.310 0.000
6.765 575.025 3.699 -3.551 0.000
1.400 119.000 3.271 -3.979 0.000
6.765 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.300 6.563 -0.900 -1.050 -8.300 0.000
13.346 0.000 -0.853 -8.103 0.000
2.775 0.000 -0.768 -8.018 0.000

eL eL1 eL2

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/18 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Volume

28.00kN -0.750 -0.900 -8.150

= 181.250 m2
= 438.021 m3

me point from centre


= 2360.03 m4
+ 0.500 x 14.500 x 0.000 x 39.063

+ 0.000 = 6.250 m

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/19 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Load Factor

Load Factors (As per IRC:6-2017)

Table 3.1 Partial Safety Factor For Verification of Equilibrium

-Refer Table B.1 of IRC:6-2017

Basic Combination Seismic Combination


Loads
Overturning or
Overturning or Sliding Restoring or Resisting
Sliding

Dead Laod,SIDL & Backfill except


1.100 0.900 1.100
wearing course

Wearing Course only 1.350 1.000 1.350

Earth Pressure due to back filling 1.500 - 1.000

Carriageway Live Load 1.500 0.000 0.000

Live Load Surcharge 1.200 0.000 0.000

Seismic Effect ( During Service) 1.500

Seismic Effect ( During Construction) 0.750

Table 3.2 Partial Safety Factor For Verification of Structural Strength: Ultimate Limit State

-Refer Table B.2 of IRC:6-2017

Loads Basic Combination Seismic Combination

Dead Laod+SIDL except wearing course 1.350 1.35

Wearing Course only 1.750 1.75

Back Filling Weight 1.500 1.00

Earth Pressure due to back filling 1.500 1.50

CWLL and Associate load and


1.500 0.20
FPLL( Service )
CWLL and Associate load and
1.350 1.00
FPLL(Construction)

Live Load Surcharge 1.200 0.20

Seismic Effect ( During Service) 1.50

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/20 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Load Factor

Seismic Effect ( During Construction) 0.75

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/21 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Load Factor

Table B.3 Partial Safety Factor For Verification of Servicibilty Limit State

-Refer Table 3.3 of IRC:6-2017

Quasi-Permanent
Loads Rare Combination Frequent Combination
Combination

Dead Laod+SIDL including wearing


1.000 1.00 1.00
course

wearing course 1.200 1.20 1.20

Back Filling Weight 1.000 1.00 1.00

Shrinkage Creep Effect 1.000 1.00 1.00

Earth Pressure due to back filling 1.000 1.000 1.000

CWLL and Associate load and FPLL 1.000 0.750 0.000

Live Load Surcharge 0.800 0.00 0.00

Table 3.4 Partial Safety Factor For Design of Foundation

-Refer Table B.4 of IRC:6-2017

Loads Basic Combination Seismic Combination

Dead Laod+SIDL except wearing course 1.350 1.35

Wearing Course only 1.750 1.75

Back Filling Weight 1.350 1.35

Earth Pressure due to back filling 1.500 1.50

CWLL and Associate load and FPLL 1.500 0.75

Live Load Surcharge 1.200 0.20

Seismic Effect ( During Service) 1.50

Seismic Effect ( During Construction) 0.75

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/22 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Load Factor

Seismic Combination

Restoring or
Resisting

0.900

1.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/23 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Seismic Coeff.

Seismic Coefficient Calculation


(As Per IRC:6-2014 , Clause 219)

Horizontal Seismic Force For Zone 5.0

Feq = Seismic forces to be resisted


Feq = Ah x (Dead load + Appropriate Live load)
Ah = horizontal seismic coefficient

= Z Sa
2 g
R
I

Z = Zone factor = 0.36


I = Importance factor = 1.2
R = Response Reduction factor = 3.0
= 1.0

T = Fundamental period of the bridge member (in sec.)


or horizontal vibrations.

= 2.0 D 1/2

1000F

D = Appropriate dead load of the superstructure , and live load in KN

F = Horizontal force in KN required to be applied at the center of mass of the superstr


mm horizontal deflection at the top of the pier/abutment for the earthquke in transv
direction; and the force to be applied at the top of bearing for the earthquake in lon
direction.
C.g. of Horizontal Force acting at a height from Foundation Level in Longitudinal direction
= 13.575 m
C.g. of Horizontal Force acting at a height from Foundation Level in Tranverse direction
= 16.435 m

Abutment Cap Top Level - Foundation Level


= 13.575 m

Dimensions of Abutment Shaft


Length = 12.50 m
Width = 1.35 m

Moment of Inertia , Ilongitudinal = 1.922 m4


Moment of Inertia , Itransverse = 329.590 m4

Ecm = 3.335E+07 kN/m2

Longitudinal Direction Transverse Direction


Force = 709.219 KN Force =
D = 5930.72 KN D =
T = 0.1829 sec T =

For Hard or Rocky Strata, with N>30


Sa = 2.500 Sa =
g g

For Medium Strata, with N>10&N<30

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/24 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Seismic Coeff.
Sa = 2.500 Sa =
g g

For Soft Soil Strata, with N<10


Sa = 2.5 Sa =
g g
Hard or Rocky Strata
Sa/g = 2.5 Sa/g =

Seismic Coeff. In Longitudinal Direction = 0.180

Seismic Coeff. In Transverse Direction = 0.377

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/25 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Seismic Coeff.

Summary of Horizontal and Vertical Seismic Coeff.

For Design of Substructure

Ah = 0.180 In Longitudinal direction


Ah = 0.377 In Transverse direction
Av = 0.252 In Vertical direction

For Design of Foundation (35% increment in Seismic Coeff for Foundation as per IRC:6-2014,Clause No. 2

Ah = 0.243 In Longitudinal direction


Ah = 0.377 In Transverse direction
Av = 0.252 In Vertical direction

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/26 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Seismic Coeff.

ic Coefficient Calculation

in Longitudinal direction
In Transverse direction

e dead load of the superstructure , and live load in KN

force in KN required to be applied at the center of mass of the superstructure for one
ntal deflection at the top of the pier/abutment for the earthquke in transverse
and the force to be applied at the top of bearing for the earthquake in longitudinal

ht from Foundation Level in Longitudinal direction

10015.048 KN
6210.442 KN
0.0498 sec

1.747

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/27 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Seismic Coeff.

1.747

1.747

1.747

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/28 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Seismic Coeff.

35% increment in Seismic Coeff for Foundation as per IRC:6-2014,Clause No. 219.8)

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/29 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Earth_Normal Dry

Earth Pressure : Normal Dry Case

Properties of backfill material : c =


f =
q =
q1 =
b =
d =

Kah =
Kph =

g =

Equivalent Live Load Surcharge height =


Assuming

F2

0.000

F4 0.00 F3

Earth Pressure Diagram

Horizontal Forces and Moments @ RL 738.135


@ RL 735.635
Due to Live Load Surcharge
Intensity for = 0.279 x 20
rectangular portion
NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/30 Minor Bridge at 116+490
Design Calculation ICT Earth_Normal Dry

Force Due To Fluid Pressure

As per Cl. 214.1 of IRC :6 -2014 g fluid

Intensity for triangular portion (At Shaft bottom level)


= 4.800 x 15.221

F = 0.5 x 73.062
= 6950.594 kN

M = 6950.59 x 5.074

Intensity for triangular portion (At Foundation level)


= 4.800 x 17.721

F = 0.5 x 85.062
= 9421.281 kN

M = 9421.28 x 5.907

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/31 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Earth_Normal Dry

Earth Pressure Coefficient For Integral Bridge


As per specialist literature :" Design Manual for roads and Bridges Part 12, BA

K* = (d/0.05H)0.4Kp

d= Thermal displacement of top of the abutmen


H= Retained Height
Kp = Passive earth pressure
K0 = At rest Earth pressure

d= 5.274 mm
10 mm
H= 17.865 m
Kp = 3.766 Passive component
K0 = 0.6

K* = 0.624

K*

H/2

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/32 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Earth_Normal Dry

K0

Earth Pressure Coefficient

Summary of Forces from Grillage Analysis


Active Earth Pressure
MOMENTS HORIZONTAL FORCE
At
At Shaft At Shaft
Foundation At Foundation Lvl
Bottom Bottom Lvl
Lvl
Member No. kN-m kN-m kN kN

286 0 0 0 0
278 4318 8096 2271 2512
280 3379 6347 1783 1972
282 3379 6347 1783 1972
284 4318 8096 2271 2512
287 0 0 0 0
15393.22 28886.57 8106.86 8967.08

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/33 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Earth_Normal Dry

Passive Earth Pressure for Integral Bridge


MOMENTS HORIZONTAL FORCE
At
At Shaft At Shaft
Foundation At Foundation Lvl
Bottom Bottom Lvl
Lvl
Member No. kN-m kN-m kN kN

286 0 0 0 0
278 9647 18107 4607 5619
280 624 14196 3617 4411
282 624 14196 3617 4411
284 9647 18107 4607 5619
287 0 0 0 0
20540.93 64605.79 16448.50 20059.15

Summary of Moment and Horizontal Force

MOMENTS

At Shaft Bottom

kN-m
Due to Earth Pressure 20540.93

Due to Minimum Fluid Pressure 35265.57

Governing of Two 35265.57

Due to Live Load Surcharge 4861.35

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/34 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Earth_Normal Dry

0
30 degree 0.524 radians
90 degree 1.571 radians
90 degree 1.571 radians
0 0 radians
20.0 degree 0.349 radians

0.279 active component


3.766 Passive component

20 kN/m3

1.2 m

753.356 (Deck Level)

Height of Shaft = 15.221 m


F1 Total Height of Foundation= 17.721 m

15.221

6.705
738.135 shaft bottom level

6.705 2.500 735.635 Foundation Lvl.

m (at Shaft Base)


m (at Foundation Level)

x 1.2 = 6.705 kN/m^2

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/35 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Earth_Normal Dry

= 4.8 kN/m3

= 73.062 kN/m^2

x 15.221 x 12.500

= 35265.57 kN.m at Shaft Bottom

= 85.06 kN/m^2

x 17.72 x 12.500

= 55652.29 kN.m at Foundation

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/36 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Earth_Normal Dry

s and Bridges Part 12, BA 42/96 Amendment No. 1 "

ement of top of the abutment

as per analysis
Round off value

sive component

K*

K0

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/37 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Earth_Normal Dry

Earth Pressure Distribution

Active Live Load Surcharge


MOMENTS HORIZONTAL FORCE
At At
At Shaft At Shaft
Foundation Foundation
Bottom Bottom Lvl
Lvl Lvl
kN-m kN-m kN kN

0 0 0 0
610 1023 237 263
477 800 186 206
477 800 186 206
610 1023 237 263
0 0 0 0
2173.58 3645.14 846.90 936.77

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/38 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Earth_Normal Dry

Live Load Surcharge for Integral Bridge


MOMENTS HORIZONTAL FORCE
At At
At Shaft At Shaft
Foundation Foundation
Bottom Bottom Lvl
Lvl Lvl
kN-m kN-m kN kN

0 0 0 0
1365 2287 528 587
1066 1789 414 460
1066 1789 414 460
1365 2287 528 587
0 0 0 0
4861.35 8152.58 1885.62 2095.13

HORIZONTAL FORCE
At Foundation
At Foundation Lvl At Shaft Bottom Lvl
Lvl
kN-m kN kN
64605.79 16448.50 20059.15

55652.29 6950.59 9421.28

64605.79 16448.50 20059.15

8152.58 1885.62 2095.13

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/39 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Earth_Normal HFL

Earth Pressure : Normal HFL Case


Properties of backfill material : c =
f =
q =
b =
d =
Ka' =
Kp' =
gd =
gwater =
Equivalent Live Load Surcharge height =
Assuming

F2
F1
81.09

F3

F4

86.782 7.291
F6 F5
94.38
Earth Pressure Diagram

Horizontal Forces and Moments @ RL 738.1

Due to Live Load Surcharge


Intensity for = 0.304 x 20
rectangular portion

Due to Active Earth Pressure

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/40 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Earth_Normal HFL

Intensity for
triangular portion

Upto HFL = 0.304 x 20

(At Shaft = 0.304 x 10


bottom level) Below HFL

Summary of Forces from Grillage Analysis

Earth Pressure
MOMENTS HORIZONTAL FORCE
At
At Shaft At Shaft
Foundation At Foundation Lvl
Bottom Bottom Lvl
Lvl
Member No. kN-m kN-m kN kN

286 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00


278 4304.42 7993.49 1990.04 2426.88
280 3371.27 6266.98 1562.23 1905.16
282 3371.27 6266.98 1562.23 1905.16
284 4304.42 7993.49 1990.04 2426.88
287 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
15351.4 28520.9 7104.5 8664.1

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/41 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Earth_Normal HFL

Passive Earth Pressure for Integral Bridge


MOMENTS HORIZONTAL FORCE
At
At Shaft At Shaft
Foundation At Foundation Lvl
Bottom Bottom Lvl
Lvl
Member No. kN-m kN-m kN kN

286 0 0 0 0
278 9619 17846 4434 5407
280 7534 13991 3481 4245
282 7534 13991 3481 4245
284 9619 17846 4434 5407
287 0 0 0 0
34305 63673.78 15829.38 19304.12

Summary of Moment and Horizontal Force

MOMENTS

At Shaft Bottom
kN-m
Due to Earth Pressure 34305.06

Due to Minimum Fluid Pressure 35265.574

Governing of Two 35265.574

Due to Live Load Surcharge 4861.35

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/42 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Earth_Normal HFL

0
30 degree 0.524 radians
90.00 degree 1.571 radians
0 0 radians
10.0 degree 0.175 radians
0.304 active component
3.766 passive component
20 kN/m3
10 kN/m3
1.2 m

753.356 (Deck Level)

13.346

740.010

1.875

738.135 shaft bottom level

735.635 Foundation Lvl.

m (at Shaft Base)

x 1.200 = 7.291 kN/m2

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/43 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Earth_Normal HFL

x 13.346 = 81.086 kN/m2

x 1.875 = 5.696 kN/m2

Live Load Surcharge


MOMENTS HORIZONTAL FORCE
At At
At Shaft At Shaft
Foundation Foundatio
Bottom Bottom Lvl
Lvl n Lvl
kN-m kN-m kN kN

0 0 0 0
610 1023 237 263
477 800 186 206
477 800 186 206
610 1023 237 263
0 0 0 0
2173.58 3645.14 846.90 936.77

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/44 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Earth_Normal HFL

Live Load Surcharge for Integral Bridge


MOMENTS HORIZONTAL FORCE
At At
At Shaft At Shaft
Foundation Foundatio
Bottom Bottom Lvl
Lvl n Lvl
kN-m kN-m kN kN

0 0 0 0
1365 2287 528 587
1066 1789 414 460
1066 1789 414 460
1365 2287 528 587
0 0 0 0
4861.35 8152.58 1885.62 2095.13

HORIZONTAL FORCE at
At Shaft Foundatio
At Foundation Bottom Lvl n lvl
kN-m kN kN
63673.78 15829.38 19304.12

55652.292 6950.594 9421.28

63673.782 15829.380 19304.12

8152.58 1885.62 2095.13

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/45 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Earth_Seismic_Dry

Earth Pressure : Seismic Dry Case


As per Clause 219.5.4 , IRC:6-2014 Seismic Zone =

Dynamic increment due to seismic force

Ca = Cos 2 ( f - l -a ) Cos d
Cos 2 a Cos ( a + d + l ) Cos l [1 + sqrt(Sin (f + d ) Sin (f - b - l ) / (C

a h = 0.180
av = 0.252
f = 30.00
d = 20.00
a = 0.00
b = 0.00

a h = HORIZONTAL SEISMIC COFFICIENT


av = VERTICAL SEISMIC COFFICIENT
f = ANGLE OF INTERNAL FRICTION OF SO
d = ANGLE OF FRICTION BETWEEN THE
a = ANGLE OF FRICTION BETWEEN THE
b = SLOPE OF EARTH FILL

l = tan-1 a h
(1 + a v)

1 2
Ca = 0.472 0.350

Ca = 0.472
Ka = 0.279
Dynamic Increment = 0.472

3 Earth Pressure : DRY CASE (Seismic case)


Equivalent Live Load Surcharge height
Assuming

Active Earth Pressure Surcharge Earth Pressure

3 (Ca-Ka) = 0.580 2 (Ca-Ka)

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/46 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Earth_Seismic_Dry

Earth Pressure Diagram fo

Due to Dynamic Live Load Surcharge


= 0.387 x 20.00
at Shaft Bottom Level
E1 = 0.50 x 9.282
= 883.034 kN

M1 = 883.034 x 10.198
at Foundation Bottom Level
E2 = 0.50 x 9.282
= 883.034 kN

M2 = 883.034 x 12.698

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/47 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Earth_Seismic_Dry

Due to Dynamic Earth Pressure

44.15
44.15
FRL 753.36

9.36
15.22125

GL 744.00

5.87
SBL 738.14

Dynamic Earth
Pressure

Dyanmic Earth Pressure Calculation


Parabola above Water Level
p_mid_heigh= 44.15 kN/m2
h = 15.22125 m
y = 1.745625 m
L = 12.500 m

Summary of Forces from Grillage Analysis

Earth Pressure
MOMENTS HORIZONTAL FORCE
At At
At Shaft At Shaft
Foundation Foundation
Bottom Bottom Lvl
Lvl Lvl
Member N kN-m kN-m kN kN

286 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00


278 3449.67 5293.95 897.52 1094.54
280 2704.49 4152.46 704.66 859.34
282 2704.49 4152.46 704.66 859.34
284 3449.67 5293.95 897.52 1094.54
287 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
12308.3 18892.8 3204.4 3907.8

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/48 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Earth_Seismic_Dry

Summary of Moment and Horizontal Force

MOMENTS

At Shaft
Bottom
kN-m

Due to active Earth Pressure(Static) 20540.93

Due to active Earth Pressure 12308.312


(dynamic Increment)
Total Earth Pressure 32849.24

Due to Minimum Fluid Pressure 35265.574

Governing of Two 35265.57

Due to Live Load Surcharge (Static)


4861.350

Due to Live Load


Surcharge(Dynamic) 916.792

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/49 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Earth_Seismic_Dry

Seismic Zone = 5.0

(1 + a v)
Sin (f + d ) Sin (f - b - l ) / (Cos ( a + d + l) Cos ( a - b )))] 2

0.524
0.349
0.000
0.000

TAL SEISMIC COFFICIENT


SEISMIC COFFICIENT
INTERNAL FRICTION OF SOIL
FRICTION BETWEEN THE WALL AND EARTH FILL
FRICTION BETWEEN THE WALL AND EARTH FILL,

0.143
=
0.236

-0.279 0.193

(Seismic case)
= 1.2 m
gdry = 20 kN/m^3
gwater = 10.00 kN/m^3

Surcharge Earth Pressure

cos a 0.39 753.356 (Deck Level)


cos(a-b)

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/50 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Earth_Seismic_Dry

738.135 ( Shaft bottom level)

735.635 ( Foundation Bottom level)

Earth Pressure Diagram for Dynamic Increment

x 1.2 = 9.282 kN/m^2

x 15.221 x 12.500

= 9005.40 kN.m

x 15.221 x 12.50

= 11212.98 kN.m

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/51 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Earth_Seismic_Dry

Parabola below Water Level


p_mid_height = 44.15 kN/m2
h = 15.22125 m
y = -1.74563 m
L = 12.500 m

Live Load Surcharge


MOMENTS HORIZONTAL FORCE
At At
At Shaft
At Shaft Bottom Foundation Foundatio
Bottom Lvl
Lvl n Lvl
kN-m kN-m kN kN

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00


578.89 1143.70 327.48 363.87
-120.50 182.84 36.02 40.02
-120.50 182.84 36.02 40.02
578.89 1143.70 327.48 363.87
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
916.79 2653.09 727.00 807.78

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/52 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Earth_Seismic_Dry

Dry Seismic Case

HORIZONTAL FORCE
At
At Foundation At Shaft Foundation
Bottom Bottom Bottom
kN-m kN kN

64605.786 16448.500 20059.146

18892.824 3204.373 3907.772

83498.610 19652.873 23966.918

55652.292 6950.594 9421.281

83498.610 19652.873 23966.918

8152.576 1885.621 2095.134

2653.092 727.000 807.778

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/53 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Earth_Seismic_Dry

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/54 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Earth_Seismic_Dry

( Foundation Bottom level)

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/55 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Earth_Seismic_Dry

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/56 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Earth_Seismic_Dry

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/57 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Earth_Seismic_HFL

Earth Pressure : Normal HFL Case


a h = 0.180
av = 0.252
f = 30.00
d = 10.00
a = 0.00
b = 0.00
Ws = 20.00 Kn/m3

l = tan-1 Ws
Ws-1

1 2
Ca ' = 0.671 0.647

Ca' = 0.671
Ka' = 0.304
Dynamic Increment = 0.671
Dynamic Increment =
gd =
gsat =
gwater =
Equivalent Live Load Surcharge height =
Foundation w
=

Dynamic Active earth pressure Variation Dynamic Surcharge earth pressu


3 ( ca'-ka') 2 (Ca'-Ka') cos a
cos(a-b)

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/58 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Earth_Seismic_HFL

Earth Pressure Diagram


h' = 1.875
h = 15.221

Dynamic active earth pressure


3 ( ca-ka) = 0.580 at deck level
3 ( ca'-ka') = 1.102 at deck level
3 ( ca'-ka')h'/h = 0.136 at HFL level

Dynamic Surcharge earth pressure


2 (Ca'-Ka') cos a = 0.735 at deck level
cos(a-b) = 0.091 at HFL level

Due to Live Load Surcharge

Dynamic surcharge pressure in dry condition at deck level


Dynamic surcharge pressure in Submerge condition at HFL level

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/59 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Earth_Seismic_HFL

at Shaft Bottom Level


F1 = 5.727 x 13.346
M1 = 955.47 x 8.55

F2 = 0.50 x 2.172

= 25.458 kN

M2 = 25.46 x 1.26

Total Force at Abutment shaft level


Total Moment at Abutment shaft level

at Foundation Bottom Level


F3 = 5.727 x 13.346

M3 = 955.47 x 11.05
F4 = 0.500 x 2.172

= 25.458 kN

M4 = 25.46 x 3.76

Total Force at Founding level


Total Moment at Founding level

Due to Dynamic Active Earth Pressure

41.94
44.15
FRL 753.36

13.35
15.2213

HFL 740.01

1.88
SBL 738.14

Dynamic Earth
Pressure

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/60 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Earth_Seismic_HFL

Dyanmic Earth Pressure Calculation


Parabola above Water Level
p_mid_height = 44.15 kN/m2
h = 15.22125 m
y = 5.735625 m
L = 12.500 m

Summary of Forces from Grillage Analysis

Earth Pressure
MOMENTS HORIZONTAL FORCE
At
At Shaft At Shaft
Foundation At Foundation Lvl
Bottom Bottom Lvl
Lvl
Member No. kN-m kN-m kN kN

286 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00


278 3449.67 5293.95 897.52 1094.54
280 2704.49 4152.46 704.66 859.34
282 2704.49 4152.46 704.66 859.34
284 3449.67 5293.95 897.52 1094.54
287 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
12308.3 18892.8 3204.4 3907.8

Summary of Moment and Horizontal Force

MOMENTS

At Shaft Bottom

kN-m
Due to active Earth Pressure(Static 34305.064

Due to active Earth Pressure 12308.312


(Dynamic Increment)
Total Earth Pressure 46613.38

Due to Minimum Fluid Pressure 35265.57

Governing of Two 46613.38

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/61 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Earth_Seismic_HFL

Due to Live Load Surcharge(Stati 4861.350

Due to Live Load Surcharge 916.792


(Dynamic Increment)

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/62 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Earth_Seismic_HFL

0.524
0.175
0.000
0.000
2.00 gm/cm3

a h 0.280
=
(1 + a v) 0.448

-0.304 0.367
0.367
20 kN/m3
10 kN/m3
10 kN/m3
1.2 m
14.50 m

Dynamic Surcharge earth pressure Variation


753.356 (Deck Level)

13.346
740.010 HFL

4.375

1.875

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/63 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Earth_Seismic_HFL

738.135 shaft bottom level

735.635 Foundation Bottom Lvl.

Pressure = 17.64 kN/m2


Pressure = 2.17 kN/m2

= 9.282 kN/m2
= 2.17 kN/m2

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/64 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Earth_Seismic_HFL

x 12.500 = 955.470 kN
= 8167.479 kN.m

x 1.875 x 12.500

= 31.982 kN.m

= 980.928 kN
= 8199.460 kN.m

x 12.500 = 955.470 kN

= 10556.154 kN.m
x 1.875 x 12.500

= 95.627 kN.m

= 980.928 kN
= 10651.781 kN.m

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/65 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Earth_Seismic_HFL

Parabola below Water Level


p_mid_height = 41.94 kN/m2
h = 15.2213 m
y = -5.7356 m
L = 12.500 m

Live Load Surcharge


MOMENTS HORIZONTAL FORCE
At At
At Shaft At Shaft
Foundation Foundatio
Bottom Bottom Lvl
Lvl n Lvl
kN-m kN-m kN kN

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00


578.89 1143.70 327.48 363.87
-120.50 182.84 36.02 40.02
-120.50 182.84 36.02 40.02
578.89 1143.70 327.48 363.87
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
916.79 2653.09 727.00 807.78

HORIZONTAL FORCE
At
At Shaft Foundatio
At Foundation Bottom
Bottom Lvl n Bottom
Lvl
kN-m kN kN
63673.782 15829.380 19304.12

18892.824 3204.373 3907.77

82566.61 19033.753 23211.9

55652.29 6950.594 9421.28

82566.61 19033.753 23211.9

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/66 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Earth_Seismic_HFL

8152.576 1885.621 2095.13

2653.092 727.000 807.778

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/67 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT HF@BRG

Horizontal Force AT Bearings (HL) IN ULTIMATE LIMIT STAT


(Refer Clause 211.5.1.1 of IRC:6-2014 )

Unfactored Basic Seismic


Loads
Load Comb Comb

DL = 4806.54 0 0.00
SIDL except wc = 289.81 0 0
WC = 834.37 0 0.00
FPLL = 0.00 0 0.00
CWLLmax-
= 1188.52 0 0.00
Reaction case
CWLLmax-
= 2385.00 0 0.20
Reaction case

CWLLmin = 210.08 0 0.00

CWLLmin = 1215.00 0 0.20

CWLLmax-Transv.
801.59 0 0.20
Moment Case

Braking Force = 0.2 x 1000


= 227.70 KN
Normal Case:
Vertical Force
Fh mR Fh/2 +m R
(R )
DL+SIDL 0.00 0 0.000 0.000

0.00 0 0.000 0.000


DL+SIDL+LL-Max
Reaction case
0.00 0 0.000 0.000

0.00 0 0.000 0.000


DL+SIDL+LL-Min
Reaction case
0.00 0 0.000 0.000

DL+SIDL+LL-Max
Transv. Moment 0.00 0 0.000 0.000
case

Longitudinal Seismic Case: Seismic effect = 1.50

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/68 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT HF@BRG

Factored
Unfactored Vertical
Vertical Force Fh mR
Force
(R)
DL+SIDL 5930.72 0.00 3202.59 0.000

DL+SIDL+LL-Max 0.00 3248.13 0.000


Reaction case

DL+SIDL+LL-Min 0.00 3248.13 0.000


Reaction case
DL+SIDL+LL-Max
Transv. Moment 160.32 3248.13 8.016
case

Transverse Seismic Case: Seismic effect = 1.50


Factored
Unfactored Vertical
Vertical Force Fh mR
Force
(R)
DL+SIDL 5930.72 0.00 960.777 0.000

DL+SIDL+LL-Max 0.00 1006.317 0.000


Reaction case

DL+SIDL+LL-Min 0.00 1006.317 0.000


Reaction case
DL+SIDL+LL-Max
Transv. Moment 160.32 1006.317 8.016
case

Horizontal Force AT Bearings (HL) For Foundation Design


(Refer Clause 211.5.1.1 of IRC:6-2014 )

Type of bearing - SPHERICAL BEARINGS

Unfactored Basic Seismic


Loads
Load Comb Comb

DL = 4806.54 0 0.00
SIDL except wc = 289.81 0 0
WC = 834.37 0 0.00
FPLL = 0.00 0 0.00
CWLLmax-
= 1188.52 1.5 0.75
Reaction case

CWLLmax-Transv. = 801.59 1.5 0.75


Moment Case
CWLLmin = 210.08 1.5 0.75

Braking Force = 227.7 KN


NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/69 Minor Bridge at 116+490
Design Calculation ICT HF@BRG

Normal Case:
Vertical Force
Fh mR Fh/2 +m R
(R )
DL+SIDL 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.000

315.12 341.550 15.756 186.531


DL+SIDL+LL-Max
Reaction case
315.12 0.000 15.756 15.756

1782.78 341.550 89.139 259.914


DL+SIDL+LL-Min
Reaction case
0.00 0.000 0.000 0.000

DL+SIDL+LL-Max
Transv. Moment 1202.38 341.550 60.119 230.894
case

Longitudinal Seismic Case: Seismic effect = 1.50


Unfactored Vertical
Vertical Force Fh mR
Force
DL+SIDL 5930.72 0.00 4323.50 0.000

DL+SIDL+LL-Max 157.56 4369.04 7.878


Reaction case

DL+SIDL+LL-Min 891.39 4369.04 44.569


Reaction case
DL+SIDL+LL-Max
Transv. Moment 601.19 4369.04 30.060
case

Transverse Seismic Case:


Unfactored Vertical
Vertical Force Fh mR
Force
DL+SIDL 5930.72 0.00 1297.05 0.000
DL+SIDL+LL-Max
157.56 1342.59 7.878
Reaction case

DL+SIDL+LL-Min
891.39 1342.59 44.569
Reaction case

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/70 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT HF@BRG

DL+SIDL+LL-Max
Transv. Moment 601.19 1342.59 30.060
case

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/71 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT HF@BRG

Horizontal Force AT Bearings (HL) For Base Pressure Calcu


(Refer Clause 211.5.1.1 of IRC:6-2014 )

Type of bearing - SPHERICAL BEARINGS

Unfactored Basic Seismic


Loads
Load Comb Comb

DL = 4806.54 1 1.00
SIDL except wc = 289.81 1 1.00
WC = 834.37 1 1.00
FPLL = 0.00 1 1.00
CWLLmax-
= 1188.52 1 0.20
Reaction case

CWLLmax-Transv. 801.59 1 0.20


Moment Case
CWLLmin = 210.08 1 0.20

Braking Force = 227.7 KN

Normal Case:
Vertical Force
Fh mR Fh/2 +m R
(R )
DL+SIDL 5930.72 0.000 296.536 296.536

6140.80 227.700 307.040 420.890


DL+SIDL+LL-Max
Reaction case
5930.72 0.000 296.536 296.536

7119.24 227.700 355.962 469.812


DL+SIDL+LL-Min
Reaction case
5930.72 0.000 296.536 296.536

DL+SIDL+LL-Max
Transv. Moment 6732.31 227.700 336.616 450.466
case

Longitudinal Seismic Case:


Vertical Force
Fh mR Fh/2 +m R
(R )
DL+SIDL 5930.72 2882.331 296.536 1737.702

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/72 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT HF@BRG

DL+SIDL+LL-Max 5972.74 2927.871 298.637 1762.572


Reaction case

DL+SIDL+LL-Min 6168.43 2927.871 308.421 1772.357


Reaction case
DL+SIDL+LL-Max
Transv. Moment 6091.04 2927.871 304.552 1768.487
case

Transverse Seismic Case:


Vertical Force
Fh mR Fh/2 +m R
(R )
DL+SIDL 5930.72 864.699 296.536 728.886

DL+SIDL+LL-Max 5972.74 910.239 298.637 753.757


Reaction case

DL+SIDL+LL-Min 6168.43 910.239 308.421 763.541


Reaction case
DL+SIDL+LL-Max
Transv. Moment 6091.04 910.239 304.552 759.672
case

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/73 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT HF@BRG

Horizontal Force AT Bearings (HL) For Stability of Foundati


(Refer Clause 211.5.1.1 of IRC:6-2014 )

Type of bearing - SPHERICAL BEARINGS

Unfactored Basic Seismic


Loads
Load Comb Comb

DL = 4806.54 1.1 1.10


SIDL except wc = 289.81 1.1 1.10
WC = 834.37 1.35 1.35
FPLL = 0.00 1.5 0.00
CWLLmax-
1188.52 1.5 0.00
Reaction case =

CWLLmax-Transv. 801.59 1.5 0.00


Moment Case
CWLLmin = 210.08 1.5 0.00

Braking Force = 227.7 KN

Normal Case:
Vertical Force
Fh mR Fh/2 +m R
(R )
DL+SIDL 6732.39 0.000 336.619 336.619

7047.51 341.550 352.376 523.151


DL+SIDL+LL-Max
Reaction case
6732.39 0.000 336.619 336.619

8515.16 341.550 425.758 596.533


DL+SIDL+LL-Min
Reaction case
6732.39 0.000 336.619 336.619

DL+SIDL+LL-Max
Transv. Moment 7934.77 341.550 396.739 567.514
case

Longitudinal Seismic Case: Seismic effect = 1.50


Unfactored Vertical Vertical Force
Fh mR
Force (R )
DL+SIDL 5930.72 6732.39 4323.50 336.619

DL+SIDL+LL-Max 6732.39 4323.50 336.619


Reaction case

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/74 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT HF@BRG

DL+SIDL+LL-Min 6732.39 4323.50 336.619


Reaction case
DL+SIDL+LL-Max
Transv. Moment 6732.39 4323.50 336.619
case

Transverse Seismic Case:


Unfactored Vertical Vertical Force
Fh mR
Force (R )
DL+SIDL 5930.72 6732.39 1297.05 336.619

DL+SIDL+LL-Max 6732.39 1297.05 336.619


Reaction case

DL+SIDL+LL-Min 6732.39 1297.05 336.619


Reaction case
DL+SIDL+LL-Max
Transv. Moment 6732.39 1297.05 336.619
case

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/75 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT HF@BRG

Horizontal Force At Bearings (HL) IN SLS CASE

Unfactored Rare Frequent


Loads
Load Comb Comb

DL = 4806.54 1 1
SIDL except wc = 289.81 1 1
WC = 834.37 1.20 1.20
FPLL = 0.00 1 0.75
CWLLmax-
1188.52 1 0.75
Reaction case =

CWLLmax-Transv. 801.59 1 0.75


Moment Case =
CWLLmin = 210.08 1 0.75

Braking Force = 227.7 KN

Normal Case: Rare Combination


Vertical Force
Fh mR Fh/2 +m R
(R )
DL+SIDL 6097.60 0.000 304.880 304.880

6307.68 227.700 315.384 429.234


DL+SIDL+LL-Max
Reaction case
6097.60 0.000 304.880 304.880

7286.11 227.700 364.306 478.156


DL+SIDL+LL-Min
Reaction case
6097.60 0.000 304.880 304.880

DL+SIDL+LL-Max
Transv. Moment 6899.19 227.700 344.959 458.809
case

Normal Case: Frequent Combination


Vertical Force
Fh mR Fh/2 +m R
(R )
DL+SIDL 6097.60 0.000 304.880 304.880

DL+SIDL+LL-Max 6255.16 170.775 312.758 398.145


Reaction case

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/76 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT HF@BRG

DL+SIDL+LL-Min 6988.98 170.775 349.449 434.837


Reaction case
DL+SIDL+LL-Max
Transv. Moment 6698.79 170.775 334.939 420.327
case

Normal Case: Quasi Permenant Combination


Vertical Force
Fh mR Fh/2 +m R
(R )
DL+SIDL 6097.60 0.000 304.880 304.880

DL+SIDL+LL-Max 6097.60 0.000 304.880 304.880


Reaction case

DL+SIDL+LL-Min 6097.60 0.000 304.880 304.880


Reaction case
DL+SIDL+LL-Max
Transv. Moment 6097.60 0.000 304.880 304.880
case

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/77 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT HF@BRG

HL) IN ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE


1.5.1.1 of IRC:6-2014 )

Load Load
(Basic (Seismic
Comb) Comb)
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 ( 1-70RW + 1-CLASS A)

0.00 477.00 SV Loading

0.00 0.00 ( 1-70RW + 1-CLASS A)

0.00 243.00 SV Loading

0.00 160.32 ( 1-70RW )

+ 0.05 x 554

Governing
Fh-m R Long. Force
( kN)
0.000 0.000
( 1-70RW + 1-
0.000 113.850 CLASS A)
Dry Case
0.000 113.850 SV Loading

( 1-70RW + 1-
0.000 113.850 CLASS A)
HFL Case
0.000 113.850 SV Loading

0.000 113.850

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/78 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT HF@BRG

Governing
Fh/2 +m R Fh-m R Long. Force
( kN)
1601.295 3202.590 0.000

1624.065 3248.130 113.850 Dry Case

1624.065 3248.130 113.850 HFL Case

1632.081 3240.114 113.850

Governing
Fh/2 +m R Fh-m R Long. Force
( kN)
480.388 960.777 0.000

503.158 1006.317 Dry Case


113.850

503.158 1006.317 HFL Case


113.850

511.174 998.301
113.850

HL) For Foundation Design


1.5.1.1 of IRC:6-2014 )

SPHERICAL BEARINGS

Load Load
(Basic (Seismic
Comb) Comb)
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
1782.78 891.39

1202.38 601.19

315.12 157.56

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/79 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT HF@BRG

Governing
Fh-m R Long. Force
( kN)
0.000 0.000
( 1-70RW + 1-
325.794 CLASS A)
113.850
Dry Case
-15.756 SV Loading
113.850
( 1-70RW + 1-
252.411 CLASS A)
113.850
HFL Case
0.000 SV Loading
113.850

281.431
113.850

Governing
Fh/2 +m R Fh-m R Long. Force
( kN)
2161.748 4323.496 0.000

2192.396 4361.158 113.850 Dry Case

2229.088 4324.467 113.850 HFL Case

2214.578 4338.977 113.850

Governing
Fh/2 +m R Fh-m R Long. Force
( kN)
648.524 1297.049 0.000

679.173 1334.711 113.850 Dry Case

715.864 1298.019 113.850 HFL Case

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/80 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT HF@BRG

701.354 1312.529 113.850

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/81 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT HF@BRG

HL) For Base Pressure Calculation


1.5.1.1 of IRC:6-2014 )

SPHERICAL BEARINGS

Load Load
(Basic (Seismic
Comb) Comb)
4806.54 4806.54
289.81 289.81
834.37 834.37
0.00 0.00
1188.52 237.70

801.59 160.32

210.08 42.02

Governing
Fh-m R Long. Force
( kN)
-296.536 0.000
( 1-70RW + 1-
-79.340 113.850 CLASS A)
Dry Case
-296.536 113.850 SV Loading

( 1-70RW + 1-
-128.262 113.850 CLASS A)
HFL Case
-296.536 113.850 SV Loading

-108.916 113.850

Governing
Fh-m R Long. Force
( kN)
2585.795 0.000

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/82 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT HF@BRG

2629.234 113.850 Dry Case

2619.450 113.850 HFL Case

2623.319 113.850

Governing
Fh-m R Long. Force
( kN)
568.163 0.000

611.602 113.850
Dry Case

601.818 113.850
HFL Case

605.687 113.850

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/83 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT HF@BRG

HL) For Stability of Foundation


1.5.1.1 of IRC:6-2014 )

SPHERICAL BEARINGS

Load Load
(Basic (Seismic
Comb) Comb)
5287.20 5287.20
318.79 318.79
1126.40 1126.40
0.00 0.00
1782.78 0.00

1202.38 0.00

315.12 0.00

Governing
Fh-m R Long. Force
( kN)
-336.619 0.000
( 1-70RW + 1-
-10.826 113.850 CLASS A)
Dry Case
-336.619 113.850 SV Loading

( 1-70RW + 1-
-84.208 113.850 CLASS A)
HFL Case
-336.619 113.850 SV Loading

-55.189 113.850

Governing
Fh/2 +m R Fh-m R Long. Force
( kN)
2498.368 3986.877 0.000

2498.368 3986.877 113.850 Dry Case

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/84 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT HF@BRG

2498.368 3986.877 113.850 HFL Case

2498.368 3986.877 113.850

Governing
Fh/2 +m R Fh-m R Long. Force
( kN)
985.144 960.430 0.000

985.144 960.430 113.850 Dry Case

985.144 960.430 113.850 HFL Case

985.144 960.430 113.850

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/85 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT HF@BRG

Quasi- Load Load (Quasi-


Load (Rare
Permanent (Frequent Permanent
Comb)
Comb Comb) Comb)

1 4806.54 4806.54 4806.54


1 289.81 289.81 289.81
1.20 1001.25 1001.25 1001.25
0 0.00 0.00 0.00
0 1188.52 891.39 0.00

0 801.59 601.19 0.00

0 210.08 157.56 0.00

Governing
Fh-m R Long. Force
( kN)
-304.880 0.000
( 1-70RW + 1-
-87.684 113.850 CLASS A)
Dry Case
-304.880 113.850 SV Loading

( 1-70RW + 1-
-136.606 113.850 CLASS A)
HFL Case
-304.880 113.850 SV Loading

-117.259 113.850

Governing
Fh-m R Long. Force
( kN)
-304.880 0.000

-141.983 113.850 Dry Case

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/86 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT HF@BRG

-178.674 113.850 HFL Case

-164.164 113.850

Governing
Fh-m R Long. Force
( kN)
-304.880 0.000

-304.880 304.880 Dry Case

-304.880 304.880 HFL Case

-304.880 304.880

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/87 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT centrifugal force

Centrifugal Force Calculation


As per clause 212 of IRC:6-2014

CENTRIFUGAL FORCE C = W V2
127 R

Normal Case

Design Speed V = 100.00 kmph


Live Load W = 1188.52 kN
Radius of Curvature R = 0.00 m

CENTRIFUGAL FORCE C = 0.00 kN

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/88 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT centrifugal force

fugal Force Calculation

Seismic Case

100.00 kmph
1188.52 kN
0.00 m

0.00 kN

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/89 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Load Combination

Possible Load Combination

Case 1 : DL+SIDL-Normal Dry Case


Normal Dry Case
Case 2 : DL+SIDL+LL-(Maximum Reaction Case)-Normal Dry Case

Case 3 : DL+SIDL-Normal HFL Case


Normal HFLCase
Case 4 : DL+SIDL+LL- (Minimum Reaction Case)-Normal HFL Case

Longitudinal Case 5 : DL+SIDL-Long. Seismic Dry Case


Seismic Dry Case Case 6 : DL+SIDL+LL-(Maximum Reaction Case)-Long. Seismic Dry Case

Longitudinal Case 7 : DL+SIDL-Long. Seismic HFL Case


Seismic HFL Case Case 8 : DL+SIDL+LL- (Minimum Reaction Case)-Long. Seismic HFL Case

Transverse Case 9 : DL+SIDL-Trans. Seismic Dry Case


Seismic Dry Case Case 10 : DL+SIDL+LL-(Maximum Reaction Case)-Trans. Seismic Dry Case

Transverse Case 11 : DL+SIDL-Trans. Seismic HFL Case


Seismic HFL Case Case 12 : DL+SIDL+LL- (Minimum Reaction Case)-Trans. Seismic HFL Case

Temperature Case 13 : DL+SIDL+LL+ TEM

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/90 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Stability of Foundation

SBC AND STABILITY CHECK OF FOUNDATION MT,ZT

A B
Foundation Lvl = 735.635 m

Properties of Footing Base:

A = 181.250 m2 ML,ZL
ZL = 438.021 m3
ZT = 377.604 m3

C D

Vertical Forces For SBC Calculation Vertical Forces For Restoring or Resisting Effect
Long. Ecc.
Unit Weights Vertical Load( P Long. Ecc. ML = PxeL1 Trans. Ecc MT = PxeT Vertical ML@toe =
Loads Load Factor Volume (m3) Load Factor (eL2) @ Toe
(kN/m3) ) kN. (eL1) (m) (kNm) (eT) (m) (kNm) Load( P ) kN. PxeL2 (kNm)
(m)
Front Filling over toe slab 1 20 575.025 11500.500 3.699 42542.925 0.000 0.000 0.900 10350.450 -3.551 -36752.130
Heel slab 1 25 130.000 3250.000 -3.391 -11019.531 0.000 0.000 0.900 2925.000 -10.641 -31123.828
Toe slab 1 25 136.000 3400.000 3.213 10922.500 0.000 0.000 0.900 3060.000 -4.038 -12354.750
portion between heel & toe 1 25 37.500 937.500 -0.150 -140.625 0.000 0.000 0.900 843.750 -7.400 -6243.750

Total 33784.53 -130492.93 0.000 59645.462 -549885.741

Summary of Forces for MIDAS

P ML MT
kN kN-m kN-m
Case 1 : DL+SIDL-Normal Dry Case 12725.61 -31270.21 -1.47
Case 2 : DL+SIDL+LL-(Maximum Reaction Case)-Normal Dry Case 14976.51 -26340.43 3499.62
Case 3 : DL+SIDL-Normal HFL Case 12725.69 -31089.74 -1.47
Case 4 : DL+SIDL+LL- (Minimum Reaction Case)-Normal HFL Case 12686.93 -31686.20 -3502.56
Case 5 : DL+SIDL-Long. Seismic Dry Case 12761.05 -19667.18 2.71
Case 6 : DL+SIDL+LL-(Maximum Reaction Case)-Long. Seismic Dry Case 13219.62 -15717.84 702.93
Case 7 : DL+SIDL-Long. Seismic HFL Case 13219.63 -15703.10 702.93
Case 8 : DL+SIDL+LL- (Minimum Reaction Case)-Long. Seismic HFL Case 12761.70 -16808.35 -697.51
Case 9 : DL+SIDL-Trans. Seismic Dry Case 12738.06 -17514.54 4521.25
Case 10 : DL+SIDL+LL-(Maximum Reaction Case)-Trans. Seismic Dry Case 13188.24 -16528.58 5221.47
Case 11 : DL+SIDL-Trans. Seismic HFL Case 13188.03 -16708.57 5221.47
Case 12 : DL+SIDL+LL- (Minimum Reaction Case)-Trans. Seismic HFL Case 13190.35 -15773.00 5221.47
Case 13 : DL+SIDL+LL+ TEM 12800.38 -16379.86 -1.47

Moment due to back fill and self wt of foundation = 109799.73 kN-m

Design Forces of foundation Design

Distance between c.g. of shaft and footing = 0.150

P ML MT
kN kN-m kN-m
Case 1 : DL+SIDL-Normal Dry Case 46510.14 80438.35 1.47
Case 2 : DL+SIDL+LL-(Maximum Reaction Case)-Normal Dry Case 48761.04 85705.77 3499.62
Case 3 : DL+SIDL-Normal HFL Case 46510.22 80618.84 1.47
Case 4 : DL+SIDL+LL- (Minimum Reaction Case)-Normal HFL Case 46471.46 80016.57 3502.56
Case 5 : DL+SIDL-Long. Seismic Dry Case 46545.58 92046.71 2.71
Case 6 : DL+SIDL+LL-(Maximum Reaction Case)-Long. Seismic Dry Case 47004.16 96064.83 702.93
Case 7 : DL+SIDL-Long. Seismic HFL Case 47004.17 96079.57 702.93
Case 8 : DL+SIDL+LL- (Minimum Reaction Case)-Long. Seismic HFL Case 46546.23 94905.63 697.51
Case 9 : DL+SIDL-Trans. Seismic Dry Case 46522.59 94195.90 4521.25
Case 10 : DL+SIDL+LL-(Maximum Reaction Case)-Trans. Seismic Dry Case 46972.77 95249.38 5221.47
Case 11 : DL+SIDL-Trans. Seismic HFL Case 46972.57 95069.37 5221.47
Case 12 : DL+SIDL+LL- (Minimum Reaction Case)-Trans. Seismic HFL Case 46974.88 96005.28 5221.47
Case 13 : DL+SIDL+LL+ TEM 46584.91 95339.92 1.47

Base pressure on corner A = sA = P/A - ML/ZL + MT/ZT


Base pressure on corner B = sB = P/A + ML/ZL + MT/ZT
Base pressure on corner C = sC = P/A - ML/ZL - MT/ZT
Base pressure on corner D = sD = P/A + ML/ZL - MT/ZT

SAFE BEARING CAPACITY CHECK SLIDING CHECK OVERTURNING CHECK


Restoring Restoring
sB Max. Base Min. Base Overturning
LOAD CASES P ML MT sA sC sD Sliding Force Force= mP + Moment =
Pressure Pressure FOS moment FOS
c.A + Fp SP.eToe+Mp

Normal Dry Case kN kNm kNm kN/m2 kN/m2 kN/m2 kN/m2 kN/m2 kN/m2 kN kN kNm kNm

Case 1 : DL+SIDL-Normal Dry


46510.138 80438.353 1.470 72.971 440.252 72.963 440.244 440.252 72.963 30088.719 41751.824 1.39 96908.679 549885.74 5.67
Case

Case 2 : DL+SIDL+LL-(Maximum
48761.037 85705.775 3499.620 82.628 473.960 64.092 455.424 473.960 64.092 32716.730 41751.824 1.28 108246.534 559837.23 5.17
Reaction Case)-Normal Dry Case

SAFE SAFE SAFE SAFE

Normal HFLCase

Case 3 : DL+SIDL-Normal HFL


46510.218 80618.836 1.470 72.559 440.665 72.552 440.657 440.665 72.552 28956.183 31637.056 1.09 95510.673 469431.10 4.91
Case

Case 4 : DL+SIDL+LL- (Minimum


Reaction Case)-Normal HFL Case
46471.459 80016.569 3502.559 82.992 448.348 64.441 429.796 448.348 64.441 31584.194 32117.472 1.02 106848.528 479382.59 4.49

SAFE SAFE SAFE SAFE

Longitudinal Seismic Dry Case

Case 5 : DL+SIDL-Long. Seismic


46545.579 92046.707 2.708 46.668 466.953 46.654 466.938 466.953 46.654 27179.521 42139.814 1.55 105899.461 574264.95 5.42
Dry Case

Case 6 : DL+SIDL+LL-(Maximum
Reaction Case)-Long. Seismic Dry 47004.155 96064.829 702.926 41.879 480.510 38.156 476.787 480.510 38.156 27293.371 42139.814 1.54 107454.225 574264.95 5.34
Case

SAFE SAFE SAFE SAFE

Longitudinal Seismic HFL Case

Case 7 : DL+SIDL-Long. Seismic


47004.166 96079.572 702.926 41.846 480.544 38.122 476.821 480.544 38.122 26424.497 32025.046 1.21 105663.982 493829.60 4.67
HFL Case

Case 8 : DL+SIDL+LL- (Minimum


Reaction Case)-Long. Seismic HFL 46546.235 94905.635 697.510 41.985 475.323 38.290 471.629 475.323 38.290 26538.347 32025.046 1.21 107218.746 493837.00 4.61
Case

SAFE SAFE SAFE SAFE

Transverse Seismic Dry Case

Case 9 : DL+SIDL-Trans. Seismic


46522.591 94195.895 4521.249 53.601 483.699 29.654 459.752 483.699 29.654 23076.360 42139.814 1.83 86061.996 574264.95 6.67
Dry Case

Case 10 : DL+SIDL+LL-(Maximum
Reaction Case)-Trans. Seismic Dry 46972.771 95249.380 5221.467 55.534 490.442 27.878 462.786 490.442 27.878 22309.108 42139.814 1.89 78548.653 574264.95 7.31
Case

SAFE SAFE SAFE SAFE


Transverse Seismic HFL Case

Case 11 : DL+SIDL-Trans. Seismic


46972.565 95069.365 5221.467 55.944 490.030 28.288 462.374 490.030 28.288 21440.234 32025.046 1.49 76270.842 493829.60 6.47
HFL Case

Case 12 : DL+SIDL+LL- (Minimum


Reaction Case)-Trans. Seismic 46974.881 96005.282 5221.467 53.820 492.179 26.164 464.524 492.179 26.164 21554.084 32025.046 1.49 77825.606 493837.00 6.35
HFL Case

SAFE SAFE SAFE SAFE

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/91 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FOUNDATION DESIGN

DESIGN OF FOUNDATION
Foundation Lvl = 735.635 m

Properties of Footing Base:

A = 181.250 m2
ZL = 438.021 m3
ZT = 377.604 m3

Forces due to Vertical Load

Unit Weights
Loads Load Factor Volume (m3)
(kN/m3)

Back filling over heel slab 1.35 20 1309.9


Heel slab 1.35 25 130.0
Toe slab 1.35 25 136.0
portion between heel & toe 1.35 25 37.5

Summary of Forces for MIDAS

Case 1 : DL+SIDL-Normal Dry Case


Case 2 : DL+SIDL+LL-(Maximum Reaction Case)-Normal Dry Case
Case 3 : DL+SIDL-Normal HFL Case
Case 4 : DL+SIDL+LL- (Minimum Reaction Case)-Normal HFL Case
Case 5 : DL+SIDL-Long. Seismic Dry Case
Case 6 : DL+SIDL+LL-(Maximum Reaction Case)-Long. Seismic Dry Case
Case 7 : DL+SIDL-Long. Seismic HFL Case
Case 8 : DL+SIDL+LL- (Minimum Reaction Case)-Long. Seismic HFL Case
Case 9 : DL+SIDL-Trans. Seismic Dry Case
Case 10 : DL+SIDL+LL-(Maximum Reaction Case)-Trans. Seismic Dry Case
Case 11 : DL+SIDL-Trans. Seismic HFL Case
Case 12 : DL+SIDL+LL- (Minimum Reaction Case)-Trans. Seismic HFL Case
Case 13 : DL+SIDL+LL+ TEM

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/92 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FOUNDATION DESIGN

Moment due to back fill and self wt of foundation =

Design Forces of foundation Design

Distance between c.g. of shaft and footing =

Case 1 : DL+SIDL-Normal Dry Case


Case 2 : DL+SIDL+LL-(Maximum Reaction Case)-Normal Dry Case
Case 3 : DL+SIDL-Normal HFL Case
Case 4 : DL+SIDL+LL- (Minimum Reaction Case)-Normal HFL Case
Case 5 : DL+SIDL-Long. Seismic Dry Case
Case 6 : DL+SIDL+LL-(Maximum Reaction Case)-Long. Seismic Dry Case
Case 7 : DL+SIDL-Long. Seismic HFL Case
Case 8 : DL+SIDL+LL- (Minimum Reaction Case)-Long. Seismic HFL Case
Case 9 : DL+SIDL-Trans. Seismic Dry Case
Case 10 : DL+SIDL+LL-(Maximum Reaction Case)-Trans. Seismic Dry Case
Case 11 : DL+SIDL-Trans. Seismic HFL Case
Case 12 : DL+SIDL+LL- (Minimum Reaction Case)-Trans. Seismic HFL Case
Case 13 : DL+SIDL+LL+ TEM

Base pressure on corner A = sA =


Base pressure on corner B = sB =
Base pressure on corner C = sC =
Base pressure on corner D = sD =

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/93 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FOUNDATION DESIGN

Summary of Design Base Pressure

LOAD CASES P ML

Normal Dry Case kN kNm

Case 1 : DL+SIDL-Normal Dry Case 62962.360 103092.645

Case 2 : DL+SIDL+LL-(Maximum Reaction


66338.708 110993.778
Case)-Normal Dry Case
Normal HFLCase

Case 3 : DL+SIDL-Normal HFL Case 62962.480 103363.369

Case 4 : DL+SIDL+LL- (Minimum Reaction


62904.343 102459.968
Case)-Normal HFL Case
Longitudinal Seismic Dry Case

Case 5 : DL+SIDL-Long. Seismic Dry Case 63071.837 136320.637

Case 6 : DL+SIDL+LL-(Maximum Reaction


63532.512 141079.919
Case)-Long. Seismic Dry Case
Longitudinal Seismic HFL Case

Case 7 : DL+SIDL-Long. Seismic HFL Case 63532.523 141094.662

Case 8 : DL+SIDL+LL- (Minimum Reaction


63074.592 139920.725
Case)-Long. Seismic HFL Case
Transverse Seismic Dry Case

Case 9 : DL+SIDL-Trans. Seismic Dry Case 63035.256 138803.261

Case 10 : DL+SIDL+LL-(Maximum Reaction


63485.436 139856.745
Case)-Trans. Seismic Dry Case
Transverse Seismic HFL Case

Case 11 : DL+SIDL-Trans. Seismic HFL Case 63485.230 139676.731

Case 12 : DL+SIDL+LL- (Minimum Reaction


63487.546 140612.648
Case)-Trans. Seismic HFL Case

Pressure calculation along Face AB:


section at def
for Shear

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/94 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FOUNDATION DESIGN

14.50

Heel

6.5 1.20
A
at deff
Case : 1 112.025 244.833 323.04
Case : 2 126.509 269.496 353.69
Case : 3 111.408 244.565 322.97
Case : 4 127.057 259.050 336.77
Case : 5 36.773 212.386 315.80
Case : 6 30.303 212.048 319.07
Case : 7 30.270 212.034 319.07
Case : 8 30.404 210.655 316.80
Case : 9 48.853 227.665 332.96
Case : 10 50.786 230.955 337.05
Case : 11 51.196 231.133 337.09
Case : 12 49.072 230.214 336.88

Average MAX Base Pressure for Design of Heel Slab-along Face AB


Average MIN Base Pressure for Design of Heel Slab-along Face AB
Average MAX Base Pressure for Design of Toe Slab-along Face AB
Max. Base Pressure at deff for Design of Toe Slab-along Face AB
Max. Base Pressure at deff for Design of Heel Slab-along Face AB

Calculation of Moment and Shear Force Along Traffic Direction:


A section at def for Shear

Case 1 : Maximum Base Pressure Case ( Dry Case )


Heel Slab - Maximum Moment Calculation
Max Average Base Pressure for Design of Heel Slab =

Upward moment due to Base pressure =

Downward moment due to backfill =


=
Downward moment due to self weight of Heel slab =
=

Net Moment at face of shaft =

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/95 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FOUNDATION DESIGN

Case 2 : Minimum Base Pressure Case ( HFL Case)


Heel Slab - Maximum Moment Calculation
Min Average Base Pressure for Design of Heel Slab =

Upward moment due to Base pressure =

Downward moment due to backfill =


=
Downward moment due to self weight of Heel slab =
=

Net Moment at face of shaft =

Heel Slab - Shear Calculation at deff from face of Wall


Depth of slab at critical section =
effective depth at critical section =
Base pressure at deff from face of wall =
Shear Force due to upward pressure at deff from face of wall =

Downward Force due to backfill =


Downward Force due to self weight of Heel slab =

Net Shear Force =


Net Shear Force / unit meter =

Toe Slab - Moment Calculation


Maximum Average Base Pressure for Design of Toe Slab =

Upward moment due to Base pressure =

Downward moment due to self weight of Toe slab =


=

Net Moment at face of shaft =

Toe Slab - Shear Calculation at deff from Face of Wall


For shear, critical section is assumed to be located at a distance equal to effective depth

Depth of slab at critical section =


effective depth at critical section =
Base pressure at deff from face of wall =
upward shear force due to base pressure =
C.g. Of base pressure =
moment due to upward pressure at critical section =
tanb =

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/96 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FOUNDATION DESIGN

reduction in shear force ( Vccd ) =

Downward force due to self weight of toe slab =


=

Net Shear Force at deff =


Net Shear Force / unit meter =

Design Input :
Design length =
Clear Cover For Foundation =

Grade of Concrete for Footing =


fck =
fctm =
Grade of Reinforcement Steel =
fy or fyk =
fyd =
Es =

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/97 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FOUNDATION DESIGN

Flexural Reinforcement Calculation:

Ultimate bending moment,Mu (kNm/m) =


Effective depth required (dreq) (mm) =
Effective depth provided (dpro) (mm) =
Check for provided depth =
R = Mu/(b d2) =
Total depth provided (mm) =
Limiting depth of neutral axis (mm) =
Actual depth of neutral axis (mm) =
Check for Neutral axis depth =
Lever arm (z) , mm =
Moment of Resistance w.r.to steel =
Check for Moment Capacity =
Ast reqd ( mm2 / m) =
cl. 16.6.1 (2) of IRC :112-2011
AS.min = 0.26 fctm bt d / fyk >= 0.0013 bt d =
Governing Ast ( mm2 / m) =
Tension Reinforc
Dia (mm) =
Spacing (mm) =
+ Dia (mm) =
Spacing (mm) =
Ast provided ( mm2 / m) =
Check for Ast provided =

As per Clause 16.6.1.1. of IRC:112-2011 , Secondary Reinforcement shall be at leas

Secondary Reinforcement (mm2/m) =


Dia (mm) =
Spacing (mm) =
Ast provided ( mm2 /m) =
Check for Ast provided =

Shear Reinforcement Calculation:

Ultimate Shear Force (VEd) =

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/98 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FOUNDATION DESIGN

Ast provided =
Depth of slab at critical section =
Effective depth at critical section =
Percentage of steel provided (r1) =
cl. 10.3.1 of IRC :112-2011
r1 = Asl/(bw d) <= 0.02 =
Actual shear stress=vED = (VEd/b*0.9d) =
Max shear capacity, 0.135 fck(1-fck/310) =
Depth Check for Shear Resistance =
cl. 10.3.2(2) Eq. 10.2 of IRC :112-2010
K = 1+Sqrt(200/d) <= 2.0 =
cl. 10.3.2(2) Eq. 10.3 of IRC :112-2010
nmin = 0.031 K3/2 fck1/2 =
0.12 K (80 r1 fck) 0.33
=
scp = NEd / Ac <= 0.2 fcd =
cl. 10.3.2(2) Eq. 10.1 of IRC :112-2011

V Rd.c = [0.12K(80ρ1 fck)0.33 + 0.15σcp]bwd subjected to


=
minimum ( n min + 0.15 scp) bw d

Check for Shear Reinforcement

Balance Shear Force= VRd,s = VEd - VRd,c =


b =
Total Shear Force =
q = 0.5 x sin^-1 [ vEd / ( 0.18 fck ( 1- fck/250))]
cot q = (< 1 cotq <2.5) =
fywd = 0.8 x fy/1.15 =
Provide Shear Reinforcement
Legged =
Dia =
Area of Shear Reinf, Asw =
z = 0.9 * d =
Spacing of shear Reinforcement required
S = Asw*z* fywd* cotq / VRd =
As per Clause 10.3.3.5 of IRC:112-2011
Asw/ (b S) = rw,min = ( 0.072 fck0.5 ) / fyk =
Spacing of shear Reinforcement required =
As per Clause 16.5.2 , eq. 16.6 of IRC:112-2011

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/99 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FOUNDATION DESIGN

Smax = 0.75 d =
Governing Spacing of Shear Reinf. =
Provided Spacing of Shear Reinf. =

Check for Spacing =

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/100 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FOUNDATION DESIGN

Vertical Long. Ecc. ML = PxeL1 Trans. Ecc MT = PxeT


Load( P ) kN. (eL1) (m) (kNm) (eT) (m) (kNm)

35366.0 -4.060 -143602.88 0.000 0.000


4387.5 -3.391 -14876.367 0.000 0.000
4590.0 3.213 14745.375 0.000 0.000
1265.6 -0.150 -189.844 0.000 0.000
45609.1 -239345.13 0.000

P ML MT
kN kN-m kN-m
17353.24 -47739.97 -2.57
20729.59 -40345.29 5249.06
17353.36 -47469.27 -2.57
17295.23 -48363.95 -5254.21
17462.72 -14528.40 3.69
Seismic Dry Case 17923.40 -9838.22 703.91
17923.41 -9823.48 703.91
Seismic HFL Case 17465.47 -10928.73 -696.52
17426.14 -12040.29 6781.51
s. Seismic Dry Case 17876.32 -11054.33 7481.72
17876.11 -11234.32 7481.72
s. Seismic HFL Case 17878.43 -10298.75 7481.72
17462.97 -26181.32 -2.57

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/101 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FOUNDATION DESIGN

148229.63 kN-m

0.150

P ML MT
kN kN-m kN-m
62962.36 103092.65 2.57
66338.71 110993.78 5249.06
62962.48 103363.37 2.57
62904.34 102459.97 5254.21
63071.84 136320.64 3.69
Seismic Dry Case 63532.51 141079.92 703.91
63532.52 141094.66 703.91
Seismic HFL Case 63074.59 139920.72 696.52
63035.26 138803.26 6781.51
s. Seismic Dry Case 63485.44 139856.74 7481.72
63485.23 139676.73 7481.72
s. Seismic HFL Case 63487.55 140612.65 7481.72
63072.09 124667.76 2.57

P/A - ML/ZL + MT/ZT


P/A + ML/ZL + MT/ZT
P/A - ML/ZL - MT/ZT
P/A + ML/ZL - MT/ZT

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/102 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FOUNDATION DESIGN

MT sA sB sC sD
kNm kN/m2 kN/m2 kN/m2 kN/m2

2.572 112.025 582.745 112.012 582.732

5249.063 126.509 633.306 98.707 605.504

2.572 111.408 583.364 111.394 583.351

5254.206 127.057 594.889 99.228 567.060

3.694 36.773 659.212 36.753 659.192

703.912 30.303 674.473 26.575 670.745

703.912 30.270 674.507 26.542 670.779

696.523 30.404 669.281 26.715 665.592

6781.507 48.853 682.627 12.934 646.709

7481.725 50.786 689.371 11.158 649.743

7481.725 51.196 688.958 11.568 649.331

7481.725 49.072 691.108 9.444 651.481

Pressure calculation along F

section at def for Shear

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/103 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FOUNDATION DESIGN

Toe

6.8 C
B
at deff
361.994 440.198 582.745 Case : 1
395.636 479.834 633.306 Case : 2
362.033 440.443 583.364 Case : 3
375.492 453.216 594.889 Case : 4
367.309 470.720 659.212 Case : 5
372.380 479.401 674.473 Case : 6
372.382 479.414 674.507 Case : 7
369.670 475.811 669.281 Case : 8
385.409 490.703 682.627 Case : 9
389.896 495.989 689.371 Case : 10
389.870 495.826 688.958 Case : 11
390.015 496.682 691.108 Case : 12

= 240.102 kN/m2 Average MAX Base Pressure fo


= 173.600 kN/m2 Average MIN Base Pressure fo
= 540.562 kN/m2 Average Base Pressure for Des
= 496.682 kN/m2 Max. Base Pressure at deff for
= 269.496 kN/m2 Max. Base Pressure at deff for

240.102 kN/m2

5072.147 kNm/m
factor
1.35 x 1309.852 / 12.500
9195.158 kNm/m
1.35 x 130.000 / 12.500
926.859 kNm/m

5072.147 -9195.158 -926.859 = -5049.871

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/104 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FOUNDATION DESIGN

153.349 kN/m2

3239.497 kNm/m
factor
1.35 x 1309.852 / 12.500
4597.579 kNm/m
1.35 x 130.000 / 12.500
556.116 kNm/m

3239.497 -4597.579 -556.116 = -1914.198

1.833 m
1.742 m
269.496 kN/m2
198.277 x 4.091 x 12.500
factor
1.35 x 1309.852 x 20
1.35 x 130.000 x 25

10139.368 -35365.992 -4387.500


-29614.125 / 12.500

540.562 kN/m2

12497.782 kNm/m

1.35 x 136.000 / 12.500


1014.3900 kNm/m

12497.782 -1014.390 = 11483.392

nce equal to effective depth from face of wall

1.862 m
1.771 m
496.682 kN/m2
593.895 x 4.391 x 12.500
1.864 m
60746.075 kNm
0.265

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/105 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FOUNDATION DESIGN

M tanb = 8634.291 KN
d
1.35 x 1.281 x 4.391
2373.292 KN

32597.401 - 2373.292 - 8634.291


21589.818 / 12.500

1000 mm
75 mm

M 40
40.00 N/mm2
3.03 N/mm2
Fe 500D ( HYSD Bars)
500.00 N/mm2
434.78 N/mm2 (fy/1.15)
200000.00 N/mm2

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/106 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FOUNDATION DESIGN

Along Traffic Direction Across Traffic Direction


Heel Slab Toe Slab Max
5049.87 11483.39 0.00
869.46 1311.13 0.00
2409.00 2409.00 2380.50
SAFE SAFE SAFE
0.87 1.98 0.00
2500.00 2500.00 2500.00
1486.01 1486.01 1468.43
220.75 441.51 67.37
OK OK OK
2317.17 2225.33 2352.47
7365.91 14147.98 2282.15
SAFE SAFE SAFE
5133.07 12105.76 0.00

3794.72 3794.72 3749.83


5133.07 12105.76 3749.83
Tension Reinforcement
32.00 32.00 25.00
110.00 110.00 220.00
0.00 32.00 0.00
300.00 110.00 200.00
7311.34 14622.69 2231.24
OK OK CHECK

orcement shall be at least 20 % of the main reinforcement

1462.27 2924.54 446.25


25.00 25.00 12.00
220.00 150.00 100.00
2231.24 3272.49 1130.97
OK OK OK

Along Traffic Direction Across Traffic Direction


Heel Slab Toe Slab
2369.130 1727.185 0.000

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/107 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FOUNDATION DESIGN

7311.343 14622.69 2231.245


1832.892 1862.324 2380.500
1741.892 1771.324 2380.500
0.0040 0.0079 0.0009

OK OK OK
1.511 1.083 0.000
4.703 4.703 4.703
SAFE SAFE SAFE

1.339 1.336 1.290

0.304 0.303 0.287


0.372 0.465 0.222
0.000 0.000 0.000

896.876 1119.107 683.709

Provide Shear Reinf. Provide Shear Reinf. OK, No shear reinf. Req.

1472.254 608.079 0.000


12.500 12.500 14.500
18403.171 7600.984 0.000
7.235 5.160 0.000
2.500 2.500 #DIV/0!
347.826 347.826 347.826

30 30 0
12 12 0
3392.920 3392.920 0.000
1567.703 1594.191 2142.450

251.332 618.794 0.000

0.001 0.001 0.001


298.038 298.038 0.000

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/108 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FOUNDATION DESIGN

1306.419 1328.493 1785.375


251.332 298.038 0.000
220 200 100

(O.K) (O.K) REVISE

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/109 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FOUNDATION DESIGN

MT,ZT
A B

C D

Summary of Forces About C.G. OF Footing


P 54552.281 KN
MT 0.000 kNm

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/110 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FOUNDATION DESIGN

MT,ZT
A B

C D

Pressure calculation along Face CD:


section at def
for Shear section at def for Shear

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/111 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FOUNDATION DESIGN
section at def for Shear
14.50

Heel Toe

C 6.5 1.2 6.8

at deff at deff
112.012 244.820 323.02 361.980 440.185
98.707 241.694 325.89 367.834 452.032
111.394 244.551 322.96 362.019 440.429
99.228 231.221 308.95 347.663 425.387
36.753 212.367 315.78 367.290 470.701
26.575 208.320 315.34 368.652 475.673
26.542 208.305 315.34 368.654 475.686
26.715 206.966 313.11 365.980 472.122
12.934 191.746 297.04 349.490 454.784
11.158 191.327 297.42 350.269 456.362
11.568 191.505 297.46 350.242 456.199
9.444 190.587 297.25 350.388 457.054

Average MAX Base Pressure for Design of Heel Slab-along Face CD =


Average MIN Base Pressure for Design of Heel Slab-along Face CD =
Average Base Pressure for Design of Toe Slab-along Face CD =
Max. Base Pressure at deff for Design of Toe Slab-along Face CD =
Max. Base Pressure at deff for Design of Heel Slab-along Face CD =

section at def for Shear


B section at def for Shear

x 20 x 3.250

x 25 x 2.641

kNm/m Tension at Top of Heel Slab

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/112 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FOUNDATION DESIGN

x 10 x 3.250

x 15 x 2.641

kNm/m Tension at Top of Heel Slab

= 10139.368 KN

= 35365.992 KN
= 4387.500 KN

= -29614.125 KN
= 2369.130 KN/m

x 25 x 2.763

kNm/m Tension at Bottom of Toe Slab

= 32597.401 KN

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/113 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FOUNDATION DESIGN

x 12.500 x 25

= 21589.818 KN
= 1727.185 KN/m

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/114 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FOUNDATION DESIGN

Across Traffic Direction


Max
0.00
0.00
2380.50
SAFE
0.00
2500.00
1468.43
67.37
OK
2352.47
2282.15
SAFE
0.00

3749.83
3749.83

25.00
220.00
0.00
200.00
2231.24
CHECK

446.25
12.00
100.00
1130.97
OK

Across Traffic Direction

0.000 kN/m

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/115 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FOUNDATION DESIGN

2231.245 mm2/m
2380.500 mm
2380.500 mm
0.0009

OK
0.000 N/mm2
4.703 N/mm2
SAFE

1.290

0.287 N/mm2
0.222 N/mm2
0.000 N/mm2

683.709 kN

OK, No shear reinf. Req.

0.000 KN/m
14.500 m
0.000 kN
0.000
#DIV/0!
347.826 N/mm2

0
0 mm
0.000 mm2
2142.450 mm

0.000 mm

0.001
0.000 mm

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/116 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FOUNDATION DESIGN

1785.375 mm
0.000 mm
100 mm

REVISE

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/117 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FOUNDATION DESIGN

ML,ZL

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/118 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FOUNDATION DESIGN

ML,ZL

section at def for Shear

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/119 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation section at def for Shear ICT FOUNDATION DESIGN

582.732
605.504
583.351
567.060
659.192
670.745
670.779
665.592
646.709
649.743
649.331
651.481

217.518 kN/m2
153.349 kN/m2
519.716 kN/m2
475.686 kN/m2
244.820 kN/m2

section at def for Shear D

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/120 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT SLS CHECK OF FOUNDATION

SLS CHECK OF FOUNDATION


Foundation Lvl = 735.635

Properties of Footing Base:

A = 181.250
ZL = 438.021
ZT = 377.604

Base pressure on corner A = sA


Base pressure on corner B = sB
Base pressure on corner C = sC
Base pressure on corner D = sD

Des

LOAD CASES P ML

Normal Dry Case kN kNm


Case 1 : DL+SIDL-Normal Dry Case 46510.138 80438.353
Case 2 : DL+SIDL+LL-(Maximum
48761.037 85705.775
Reaction Case)-Normal Dry Case
Normal HFLCase
Case 3 : DL+SIDL-Normal HFL Case 46510.218 80618.836
Case 4 : DL+SIDL+LL- (Minimum
46471.459 80016.569
Reaction Case)-Normal HFL Case

Pressure calculation along Face AB:

Heel

6.5

Case 1 : 72.971
Case 2: 82.628
Case 3: 72.559
NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR
Case 4: ABUTMENT/121 82.992 Minor Bridge at 116+490
Design Calculation ICT SLS CHECK OF FOUNDATION

m2
m3
m3

= P/A - ML/ZL + MT/ZT


= P/A + ML/ZL + MT/ZT
= P/A - ML/ZL - MT/ZT
= P/A + ML/ZL - MT/ZT

Design Base Pressure

MT sA sB sC sD

kNm kN/m2 kN/m2 kN/m2 kN/m2


1.470 72.971 440.252 72.963 440.244

3499.620 82.628 473.960 64.092 455.424

1.470 72.559 440.665 72.552 440.657

3502.559 82.992 448.348 64.441 429.796

14.50

Toe

1.2 6.8

237.61 268.010 440.252


258.05 290.439 473.960
237.57 268.036 440.665
NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/122 Minor Bridge at 116+490
246.77 277.009 448.348
Design Calculation ICT SLS CHECK OF FOUNDATION

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/123 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Forces on Abutment shaft Top from STAAD model :

Abutment shaft Top Forces

Member L/C Node Axial Force kN Shear-Y kN


280 SELF WEIGHT 5 1126.827 -529.42
280 CRASH BARRIER 5 37.555 -28.96
280 SIDL WEARING COAT 5 135.947 -73.87
280 EARTH PRESSURE 5 -22.761 -476.24
280 LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE 5 -17.435 -87.23
280 EARTH PRESSURE WITH HFL 5 -22.669 -475.52
280 SEIESMIC EARTH PRESSURE 5 -27.153 -399.34
280 LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE DYNAMIC 5 -27.683 -138.51
280 PASSIVE EARTH PRESSURE 5 50.769 -1065.85
280 PASSIVE EARTH PRESSURE HFL 5 50.594 -1063.13
280 PASSIVE LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE 5 38.993 -195.11
280 BRAKING FORCE 5 -11.263 11.21
280 TEMPERATURE 5 4.003 -82.41
280 LIVE LOAD 5 452.775 -267.972

Member L/C Node Axial Force kN Shear-Y kN


278 SELF WEIGHT 3 1276.225 -645.75
278 CRASH BARRIER 3 105.526 -47.68
278 SIDL WEARING COAT 3 276.923 -105.98
278 EARTH PRESSURE 3 -22.101 -603.98
278 LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE 3 -20.227 -112.04
278 EARTH PRESSURE WITH HFL 3 -22.003 -603.06
278 SEIESMIC EARTH PRESSURE 3 -28.569 -507.41
278 LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE DYNAMIC 3 -32.117 -177.91
278 PASSIVE EARTH PRESSURE 3 49.26 -1351.73
278 PASSIVE EARTH PRESSURE HFL 3 49.091 -1348.29
278 PASSIVE LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE 3 45.24 -250.59
278 BRAKING FORCE 3 -11.858 14.04
278 TEMPERATURE 3 8.287 -102.249
278 LIVE LOAD 3 636.606 -324.092

Member L/C Node Axial Force kN Shear-Y kN


282 SELF WEIGHT 7 1126.827 -529.42
282 CRASH BARRIER 7 37.555 -28.96
282 SIDL WEARING COAT 7 135.947 -73.87
282 EARTH PRESSURE 7 -22.761 -476.24
282 LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE 7 -17.435 -87.23
282 EARTH PRESSURE WITH HFL 7 -22.669 -475.52
282 SEIESMIC EARTH PRESSURE 7 -27.153 -399.34
282 LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE DYNAMIC 7 -27.683 -138.51
282 PASSIVE EARTH PRESSURE 7 50.769 -1065.85
282 PASSIVE EARTH PRESSURE HFL 7 50.594 -1063.13
282 PASSIVE LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE 7 38.993 -195.11
282 BRAKING FORCE 7 -11.263 11.21
282 TEMPERATURE 7 4.003 -82.41
282 LIVE LOAD 7 390.819 -244.383

Member L/C Node Axial Force kN Shear-Y kN


284 SELF WEIGHT 9 1276.225 -645.75
284 CRASH BARRIER 9 105.526 -47.68
284 SIDL WEARING COAT 9 276.923 -105.98
284 EARTH PRESSURE 9 -22.101 -603.98
284 LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE 9 -20.227 -112.04
284 EARTH PRESSURE WITH HFL 9 -22.003 -603.06
284 SEIESMIC EARTH PRESSURE 9 -28.569 -507.41
284 LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE DYNAMIC 9 -32.117 -177.91
284 PASSIVE EARTH PRESSURE 9 49.26 -1351.73
284 PASSIVE EARTH PRESSURE HFL 9 49.091 -1348.29
284 PASSIVE LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE 9 45.24 -250.59
284 BRAKING FORCE 9 -11.858 14.04
284 TEMPERATURE 9 8.287 -102.249
284 LIVE LOAD 9 550.337 -276.763

Beam L/C Node Axial Force kN Shear-Y kN


1 ABUTMENT LONGITUDIONAL 2 0.198 -10.209
1 ABUTMENT TRANSVERSE 2 0.151 8.725
1 SUPER STRUCTURE LONGITUDIONA2 0 0
1 SUPER STRUCTURE TRANSVERSE 2 0 0

Beam L/C Node Axial Force kN Shear-Y kN


1 SEISMIC LONGITUDIONAL Top 0.349 -1.484
1 SEISMIC TRANSVERSE Top 0 0
Shear-Z kN Moment-Y kNm Moment-Z kNm
-0.04 0.2 -6031.47
-0.42 -2.35 -326.84
-0.83 -1.44 -837.64
-0.04 0.07 -268.81
-0.01 0.01 223.65
-0.04 0.07 -268.84
-0.03 0.06 -36.3
-0.01 0.02 355.11
-0.08 0.17 -604.6
-0.08 0.16 -602.41
-0.02 0.03 500.2
0.01 0.01 68.71
-0.011 0.046 -503.04
-7.628 54.86 -3089.969

Shear-Z kN Moment-Y kNm Moment-Z kNm


-0.09 0 -7345.14
7.53 -145.27 -545.89
11.94 -229.95 -1210.2
-0.11 0.15 -321.25
-0.03 0.02 271.38
-0.11 0.15 -321.29
-0.1 0.12 -40.35
-0.05 0.04 430.91
-0.24 0.33 -722.59
-0.24 0.33 -719.96
-0.06 0.05 606.96
0.03 0.02 85.54
-0.042 0.095 -609.662
28.236 -568.451 -3733.058

Shear-Z kN Moment-Y kNm Moment-Z kNm


0.04 -0.2 -6031.47
0.42 2.35 -326.84
0.83 1.44 -837.64
0.04 -0.07 -268.81
0.01 -0.01 223.65
0.04 -0.07 -268.84
0.03 -0.06 -36.3
0.01 -0.02 355.11
0.08 -0.17 -604.6
0.08 -0.16 -602.41
0.02 -0.03 500.2
-0.01 -0.01 68.71
0.011 -0.046 -503.04
9.21 -113.41 -2808.131

Shear-Z kN Moment-Y kNm Moment-Z kNm


0.09 0 -7345.14
-7.53 145.27 -545.89
-11.94 229.95 -1210.2
0.11 -0.15 -321.25
0.03 -0.02 271.38
0.11 -0.15 -321.29
0.1 -0.12 -40.35
0.05 -0.04 430.91
0.24 -0.33 -722.59
0.24 -0.33 -719.96
0.06 -0.05 606.96
-0.03 -0.02 85.54
0.042 -0.095 -609.662
-27.275 478.727 -3168.657

Shear-Z kN Moment-Y kNm Moment-Z kNm


0 0 3.787
0 0 2.72
-0.162 0.036 0
34.058 0.021 0

Shear-Z kN Moment-Y kNm Moment-Z kNm


0 0 6.507
33.896 0.057 0
Forces on Abutment shaft Bottom from STAAD model :

Abutment shaft Bottom Forces

Member L/C Node Axial Force kN Shear-Y kN


278 SELF WEIGHT 153 -3621.007 -645.75
278 CRASH BARRIER 153 -105.526 -47.68
278 SIDL WEARING COAT 153 -276.923 -105.98
278 EARTH PRESSURE 153 22.101 1700.39
278 LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE 153 20.227 247.61
278 EARTH PRESSURE WITH HFL 153 22.003 1686.54
278 SEIESMIC EARTH PRESSURE 153 28.569 1032.38
278 LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE DYNAMIC 153 32.117 393.15
278 PASSIVE EARTH PRESSURE 153 -49.26 3803.58
278 PASSIVE EARTH PRESSURE HFL 153 -49.091 3767.2
278 PASSIVE LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE 153 -45.24 553.78
278 BRAKING FORCE 153 11.858 14.04
278 TEMPERATURE 153 -8.287 102.249
278 LIVE LOAD 562.248 -324.05

Member L/C Node Axial Force kN Shear-Y kN


280 SELF WEIGHT 155 -2969.155 -529.42
280 CRASH BARRIER 155 -37.555 -28.96
280 SIDL WEARING COAT 155 -135.947 -73.87
280 EARTH PRESSURE 155 22.761 1334.34
280 LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE 155 17.435 195.35
280 EARTH PRESSURE WITH HFL 155 22.669 1323.46
280 SEIESMIC EARTH PRESSURE 155 27.153 810.5
280 LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE DYNAMIC 155 27.683 310.17
280 PASSIVE EARTH PRESSURE 155 -50.769 2984.75
280 PASSIVE EARTH PRESSURE HFL 155 -50.594 2956.17
280 PASSIVE LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE 155 -38.993 436.91
280 BRAKING FORCE 155 11.263 11.21
280 TEMPERATURE 155 -4.003 82.41
280 LIVE LOAD 457.593 -274.37

Member L/C Node Axial Force kN Shear-Y kN


282 SELF WEIGHT 157 -2969.155 -529.42
282 CRASH BARRIER 157 -37.555 -28.96
282 SIDL WEARING COAT 157 -135.947 -73.87
282 EARTH PRESSURE 157 22.761 1334.34
282 LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE 157 17.435 195.35
282 EARTH PRESSURE WITH HFL 157 22.669 1323.46
282 SEIESMIC EARTH PRESSURE 157 27.153 810.5
282 LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE DYNAMIC 157 27.683 310.17
282 PASSIVE EARTH PRESSURE 157 -50.769 2984.75
282 PASSIVE EARTH PRESSURE HFL 157 -50.594 2956.17
282 PASSIVE LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE 157 -38.993 436.91
282 BRAKING FORCE 157 11.263 11.21
282 TEMPERATURE 157 -4.003 82.41
282 LIVE LOAD 395.477 -250.63

Member L/C Node Axial Force kN Shear-Y kN


284 SELF WEIGHT 159 -3621.007 -645.75
284 CRASH BARRIER 159 -105.526 -47.68
284 SIDL WEARING COAT 159 -276.923 -105.98
284 EARTH PRESSURE 159 22.101 1700.39
284 LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE 159 20.227 247.61
284 EARTH PRESSURE WITH HFL 159 22.003 1686.54
284 SEIESMIC EARTH PRESSURE 159 28.569 1032.38
284 LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE DYNAMIC 159 32.117 393.15
284 PASSIVE EARTH PRESSURE 159 -49.26 3803.58
284 PASSIVE EARTH PRESSURE HFL 159 -49.091 3767.2
284 PASSIVE LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE 159 -45.24 553.78
284 BRAKING FORCE 159 11.858 14.04
284 TEMPERATURE 159 -8.287 102.249
284 LIVE LOAD 482.504 -276.92

Beam L/C Node Axial Force kN Shear-Y kN


1 ABUTMENT LONGITUDIONAL 1 -0.151 51.553
1 ABUTMENT TRANSVERSE 1 -0.198 10.209
1 SUPER STRUCTURE LONGITUDIONA1 0 0
1 SUPER STRUCTURE TRANSVERSE 1 0 0

Beam L/C Node Axial Force kN Shear-Y kN


1 SEISMIC LONGITUDIONAL Bottom -0.349 61.762
1 SEISMIC TRANSVERSE Bottom 0 0
Shear-Z kN Moment-Y kNm Moment-Z kNm
-0.09 -1.32 2564.49
7.53 -29.66 185.77
11.94 -46.73 416.19
-0.11 -1.5 -2853.87
-0.03 -0.41 -768.78
-0.11 -1.5 -2861.64
-0.1 -1.35 -2608.75
-0.05 -0.66 -1220.68
-0.24 -3.36 -6380.69
-0.24 -3.35 -6397.33
-0.06 -0.93 -1719.42
0.03 0.5 -129.97
0.042 0.655 -1217.016
20.53 -98.56 1268.79

Shear-Z kN Moment-Y kNm Moment-Z kNm


-0.04 -0.45 2092.98
-0.42 -8.79 117.6
-0.83 -14.25 295.95
-0.04 -0.49 -2232.9
-0.01 -0.12 -605.9
-0.04 -0.49 -2239.01
-0.03 -0.43 -2044.29
-0.01 -0.2 -962.06
-0.08 -1.09 -4992.27
-0.08 -1.09 -5005.39
-0.02 -0.28 -1355.13
0.01 0.13 -103.38
0.011 0.142 -969.208
-6.78 -49.91 1065.12

Shear-Z kN Moment-Y kNm Moment-Z kNm


0.04 0.45 2092.98
0.42 8.79 117.6
0.83 14.25 295.95
0.04 0.49 -2232.9
0.01 0.12 -605.9
0.04 0.49 -2239.01
0.03 0.43 -2044.29
0.01 0.2 -962.06
0.08 1.09 -4992.27
0.08 1.09 -5005.39
0.02 0.28 -1355.13
-0.01 -0.13 -103.38
-0.011 -0.142 -969.208
8.76 21.37 983.8

Shear-Z kN Moment-Y kNm Moment-Z kNm


0.09 1.32 2564.49
-7.53 29.66 185.77
-11.94 46.73 416.19
0.11 1.5 -2853.87
0.03 0.41 -768.78
0.11 1.5 -2861.64
0.1 1.35 -2608.75
0.05 0.66 -1220.68
0.24 3.36 -6380.69
0.24 3.35 -6397.33
0.06 0.93 -1719.42
-0.03 -0.5 -129.97
-0.042 -0.655 -1217.016
-19.79 34.04 1105.92

Shear-Z kN Moment-Y kNm Moment-Z kNm


0 0 379.736
0 0 178.544
-128.349 1144.673 0
-34.058 608.261 0

Shear-Z kN Moment-Y kNm Moment-Z kNm


0 0 558.28
-162.407 1752.934 0
Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT TOP

CALCULATION OF ULS FORCES FOR DESIGN OF ABUTMENT


Abutment shaft TOP lvl = 738.135 m

Case 1 : DL+SIDL-Normal Dry Case

Vertical
load factor MT
Load( P ) kN.
SELF WEIGHT 1.35 4806.104 0
CRASH BARRIER 1.35 286.162 0
SIDL WEARING COAT 1.75 825.74 0
PASSIVE EARTH PRESSURE 1.5 200.058 0
Total 8619.6911 0

Summary of Forces
P 8619.691 KN
ML 49622.228 kNm
MT 0.000 kNm

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/132 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT TOP

Case 2 : DL+SIDL+LL-(Maximum Reaction Case)-Normal Dry Case

Vertical
load factor MT
Load( P ) kN.
SELF WEIGHT 1.35 4806.104 0
CRASH BARRIER 1.35 286.162 0
SIDL WEARING COAT 1.75 825.74 0
PASSIVE EARTH PRESSURE 1.5 200.058 0
LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE 1.2 168.466 0
LIVE LOAD 1.5 2030.537 -148.274
BRAKING FORCE 1.5 34.384 0
Total 11919.2318 -222.411

Summary of Forces
P 11919.232 KN
ML 66627.517 kNm
MT 222.411 kNm

Case 3 : DL+SIDL-Normal HFL Case

Vertical
load factor MT
Load( P ) kN.
SELF WEIGHT 1.35 4806.104 0
CRASH BARRIER 1.35 286.162 0
SIDL WEARING COAT 1.75 825.74 0
PASSIVE EARTH PRESSURE HFL 1.5 199.37 0
Total 8618.6591 0

Summary of Forces
P 8618.659 KN
ML 49607.768 kNm
MT 0.000 kNm

Case 4 : DL+SIDL+LL- (Minimum Reaction Case)-Normal HFL Case

Vertical
load factor MT
Load( P ) kN.
SELF WEIGHT 1.35 4806.104 0

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/133 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT TOP

CRASH BARRIER 1.35 286.162 0


SIDL WEARING COAT 1.75 825.74 0
PASSIVE EARTH PRESSURE HFL 1.5 199.37 0
LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE 1.2 168.466 0
LIVE LOAD 1.5 2030.537 -148.274
BRAKING FORCE 1.5 34.384 0
Total 11918.1998 -222.411

Summary of Forces
P 11918.200 KN
ML 66613.057 kNm
MT 222.411 kNm

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/134 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT TOP

Case 5 : DL+SIDL-Long. Seismic Dry Case

Vertical
load factor MT
Load( P ) kN.
SELF WEIGHT 1.35 4806.104 0
CRASH BARRIER 1.35 286.162 0
SIDL WEARING COAT 1.75 825.74 0
ACTIVE EARTH PRESSURE 1.5 -89.724 0
DUE TO DYNAMIC INCREMENT
OF EP 1.5 -84.291 0.06
LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE
DYNAMIC 1.2 -119.6 0
SEISMIC LONGITUDIONAL 1.5 621.652 0
SEISMIC TRANSVERSE 1.5 932.478 0.057
Total 10246.25631 0.1755

Summary of Forces
Seismic Seismic
Downward Upward
P 10246.256 10246.256 KN
ML 45690.130 45690.130 kNm
MT 0.176 0.176 kNm

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/135 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT TOP

Case 6 : DL+SIDL+LL-(Maximum Reaction Case)-Long. Seismic Dry Cas

Vertical
load factor Load( P )
kN.
SELF WEIGHT 1.35 4806.104
CRASH BARRIER 1.35 286.162
SIDL WEARING COAT 1.75 825.74
ACTIVE EARTH PRESSURE 1.5 -89.724
DUE TO DYNAMIC INCREMENT
OF EP 1.5 -84.291
LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE
DYNAMIC 1.2 -119.6
LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE 1.2 168.466
LIVE LOAD 0.2 2030.537
BRAKING FORCE 1.5 34.384
SEISMIC LONGITUDIONAL 1.5 -17.940
SEISMIC TRANSVERSE 0.45 -264.614
Total 8428.91768

Summary of Forces
Seismic Seismic
Downward Upward
P 8428.918 8428.918 KN
ML 46075.180 46075.180 kNm
MT 29.539 29.539 kNm

Case 7 : DL+SIDL-Long. Seismic HFL Case

Vertical
load factor Load( P )
kN.
SELF WEIGHT 1.35 4806.104
CRASH BARRIER 1.35 286.162
SIDL WEARING COAT 1.75 825.74
ACTIVE EARTH PRESSURE HFL 1.5 -89.344
DUE TO DYNAMIC INCREMENT
OF EP 1.5 -84.291
LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE
DYNAMIC 1.2 -119.6
SEISMIC LONGITUDIONAL 1.5 619.611959
SEISMIC TRANSVERSE 0.45 929.417938
Total 9263.28761

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/136 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT TOP

Summary of Forces Seismic Seismic


Downward Upward
P 9263.288 9263.288 KN
ML 45690.340 45690.340 kNm
MT 0.116 0.116 kNm

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/137 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT TOP

Case 8 : DL+SIDL+LL- (Minimum Reaction Case)-Long. Seismic HFL Ca

Vertical
load factor Load( P )
kN.
SELF WEIGHT 1.35 4806.104
CRASH BARRIER 1.35 286.162
SIDL WEARING COAT 1.75 825.74
ACTIVE EARTH PRESSURE HFL 1.5 -89.344
DUE TO DYNAMIC INCREMENT
OF EP 1.5 -84.291
LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE
DYNAMIC 1.2 -119.6
LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE 1.2 168.466
LIVE LOAD 0.2 28.011
BRAKING FORCE 1.5 34.384
SEISMIC LONGITUDIONAL 1.5 619.611959
SEISMIC TRANSVERSE 0.45 929.417938
Total 9522.62501

Summary of Forces
Seismic Seismic
Downward Upward
P 9522.625 9522.625 KN
ML 43492.100 43492.100 kNm
MT 5.824 5.824 kNm

Case 9 : DL+SIDL-Trans. Seismic Dry Case

Vertical
load factor MT
Load( P ) kN.
SELF WEIGHT 1.35 4806.104 0
CRASH BARRIER 1.35 286.162 0
SIDL WEARING COAT 1.75 825.74 0
ACTIVE EARTH PRESSURE 1.5 -89.724 0
DUE TO DYNAMIC INCREMENT
OF EP 1.5 -84.291 0.06
LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE
DYNAMIC 1.2 -119.6 0
SEISMIC LONGITUDIONAL 1.5 621.6519216 0
SEISMIC TRANSVERSE 0.45 932.4778824 0.057
Total 9267.154529 0.11565

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/138 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT TOP

Summary of Forces
Seismic Seismic
Downward Upward
P 9267.155 9267.155 KN
ML 45690.130 45690.130 kNm
MT 0.116 0.116 kNm

Case 10 : DL+SIDL+LL-(Maximum Reaction Case)-Trans. Seismic Dry C

Vertical
load factor Load( P )
kN.
SELF WEIGHT 1.35 4806.104
CRASH BARRIER 1.35 286.162
SIDL WEARING COAT 1.75 825.74
ACTIVE EARTH PRESSURE HFL 1.5 -89.344
DUE TO DYNAMIC INCREMENT
OF EP 1.5 -84.291
LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE
DYNAMIC 1.2 -119.6
SEISMIC LONGITUDIONAL 1.5 619.611959
SEISMIC TRANSVERSE 0.45 929.417938
Total 9263.28761

Summary of Forces
Seismic Seismic
Downward Upward
P 9263.288 9263.288 KN
ML 45690.340 45690.340 kNm
MT 0.116 0.116 kNm

Case 11 : DL+SIDL-Trans. Seismic HFL Case

Vertical
load factor MT
Load( P ) kN.
SELF WEIGHT 1.35 4806.104 0
CRASH BARRIER 1.35 286.162 0
SIDL WEARING COAT 1.75 825.74 0

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/139 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT TOP

ACTIVE EARTH PRESSURE HFL 1.5 -89.344 0


DUE TO DYNAMIC INCREMENT
OF EP 1.5 -84.291 0.06
LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE
DYNAMIC 1.2 -119.6 0
SEISMIC LONGITUDIONAL 0.45 619.6119587 0
SEISMIC TRANSVERSE 1.5 929.4179381 0.057
Total 9588.583889 0.1755

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/140 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT TOP

Summary of Forces
Seismic Seismic
Downward Upward
P 9588.584 9588.584 KN
ML 45697.172 45697.172 kNm
MT 0.176 0.176 kNm

Case 12 : DL+SIDL+LL- (Minimum Reaction Case)-Trans. Seismic HFL C

Vertical
load factor MT
Load( P ) kN.
SELF WEIGHT 1.35 4806.10 0.00
CRASH BARRIER 1.35 286.16 0.00
SIDL WEARING COAT 1.75 825.74 0.00
ACTIVE EARTH PRESSURE HFL 1.5 -89.34 0.00
DUE TO DYNAMIC INCREMENT
OF EP 1.5 -84.29 0.06
LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE
DYNAMIC 1.2 -119.60 0.00
LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE 1.2 168.47 0.00
LIVE LOAD 0.2 28.01 28.54
BRAKING FORCE 1.5 34.38 0.00
SEISMIC LONGITUDIONAL 0.45 619.61 0.00
SEISMIC TRANSVERSE 1.5 929.42 0.06
Total 9847.92 5.88

Summary of Forces
Seismic Seismic
Downward Upward
P 9847.921 9847.921 KN
ML 43498.933 43498.933 kNm
MT 5.884 5.884 kNm

Case 13 : DL+SIDL+LL+ Temperature Case

Vertical
load factor MT
Load( P ) kN.

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/141 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT TOP

SELF WEIGHT 1.35 4806.104 0


CRASH BARRIER 1.35 286.162 0
SIDL WEARING COAT 1.75 825.74 0
PASSIVE EARTH PRESSURE 1.5 200.058 0
LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE 1.2 168.466 0
LIVE LOAD 1.15 2030.537 -148.274
BRAKING FORCE 1.15 34.384 0
TEMPERATURE 1.5 24.58 0
Total 11196.50945 -170.5151

Summary of Forces
P 11196.509 KN
ML 62039.606 kNm
MT 170.515 kNm

Centrifugal Force : Normal Case


Centrifugal Force (C.F.) = 1.50 x
Transverse Moment due to C.F. = 0.000 x (

Centrifugal Force : Seismic Case


Centrifugal Force (C.F.) = 0.20 x
Transverse Moment due to C.F. = 0.000 x (

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/142 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT TOP

Summary of ULS Forces for Design of Abutment Shaft

Total forces at TOP of abutmen


shaft

LOAD CASES P ML

Normal Dry Case kN kNm

Case 1 : DL+SIDL-Normal Dry


8619.69 49622.23
Case

Case 2 : DL+SIDL+LL-(Maximum
11919.23 66627.52
Reaction Case)-Normal Dry Case

Normal HFLCase

Case 3 : DL+SIDL-Normal HFL


8618.66 49607.77
Case

Case 4 : DL+SIDL+LL- (Minimum


11918.20 66613.06
Reaction Case)-Normal HFL Case

Longitudinal Seismic Dry Case

DN 10246.26 45690.13
Case 5 : DL+SIDL-Long. Seismic
Dry Case
UP 10246.26 45690.13

Case 6 : DL+SIDL+LL-(Maximum DN 8428.92 46075.18


Reaction Case)-Long. Seismic Dry
Case UP 8428.92 46075.18

Longitudinal Seismic HFL Case

DN 9263.29 45690.34
Case 7 : DL+SIDL-Long. Seismic
HFL Case
UP 9263.29 45690.34

Case 8 : DL+SIDL+LL- (Minimum DN 9522.63 43492.10


Reaction Case)-Long. Seismic HFL
Case UP 9522.63 43492.10

Transverse Seismic Dry Case

DN 9267.15 45690.13
Case 9 : DL+SIDL-Trans. Seismic
Dry Case
NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/143 Minor Bridge at 116+490
Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT TOP
Case 9 : DL+SIDL-Trans. Seismic
Dry Case
UP 9267.15 45690.13

Case 10 : DL+SIDL+LL-(Maximum DN 9263.29 45690.34


Reaction Case)-Trans. Seismic Dry
Case UP 9263.29 45690.34

Transverse Seismic HFL Case

DN 9588.58 45697.17
Case 11 : DL+SIDL-Trans. Seismic
HFL Case
UP 9588.58 45697.17

Case 12 : DL+SIDL+LL- (Minimum DN 9847.92 43498.93


Reaction Case)-Trans. Seismic
HFL Case UP 9847.92 43498.93

Case 13 : DL+SIDL+LL+
11196.51 62039.61
Temperature Case

MAX = 11919.23 66627.52

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/144 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT TOP

OF ABUTMENT SHAFT

ML

-26753.22
-1745.46
-4095.68
-2654.38
-49622.228

15366.962987
54813.247682
4.640625E-05

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/145 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT TOP

mal Dry Case

ML

-26753.22
-1745.46
-4095.68
-2654.38
2214.32
-12799.815
-308.5
-66627.5165

ML

-26753.22
-1745.46
-4095.68
-2644.74
-49607.768

mal HFL Case

ML

-26753.22

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/146 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT TOP

-1745.46
-4095.68
-2644.74
2214.32
-12799.815
-308.5
-66613.0565

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/147 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT TOP

ML

-26753.22
-1745.46
-4095.68
-1180.12

-117

1572.04
6.507
0
-45690.1295

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/148 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT TOP

. Seismic Dry Case

MT ML

0 -26753.22
0 -1745.46
0 -4095.68
0 -1180.12

0.06 -117

0 1572.04
0 2214.32
-148.274 -12799.815
0 -308.5
0 -6.507
0.057 0
-29.53915 -46075.1795

16651.0132 14558.31974
84514.3108 84156.15846
19442.0348 19442.03475

MT ML

0 -26753.22
0 -1745.46
0 -4095.68
0 -1180.26

0.06 -117

0 1572.04
0 6.507
0.057 0
0.11565 -45690.3395

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/149 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT TOP

16338.7175 14305.98188
79041.2045 78698.84395
18226.1268 18226.12683

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/150 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT TOP

. Seismic HFL Case

MT ML

0 -26753.22
0 -1745.46
0 -4095.68
0 -1180.26

0.06 -117

0 1572.04
0 2214.32
28.540 19.027
0 -308.5
0 6.507
0.057 0
5.8236525426 -43492.1002

16385.3863 14343.34609
82672.8022 82327.65028
18442.1762 18442.17618

ML

-26753.22
-1745.46
-4095.68
-1180.12

-117

1572.04
6.507
0
-45690.1295

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/151 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT TOP

ns. Seismic Dry Case

MT ML

0 -26753.22
0 -1745.46
0 -4095.68
0 -1180.26

0.06 -117

0 1572.04
0 6.507
0.057 0
0.11565 -45690.3395

16651.0132 14558.31974
65468.524 65110.37166
63963.984 63963.98404

ML

-26753.22
-1745.46
-4095.68

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/152 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT TOP

-1180.26

-117

1572.04
6.507
0
-45697.17185

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/153 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT TOP

16338.7175 14305.98188
61192.9254 60850.56488
60753.756 60753.756

ns. Seismic HFL Case

ML

-26753.22
-1745.46
-4095.68
-1180.26

-117.00

1572.04
2214.32
19.03
-308.50
6.51
0.00
-43498.93

16385.3863 14343.34609
63861.8915 63516.7396
61237.1928 61237.19284

ML

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/154 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT TOP

-26753.22
-1745.46
-4095.68
-2654.38
2214.32
-12799.815
-308.5
-2225.404
-62039.60625

0.00 = 0.000
754.700 - 738.135 ) = 0.000

0.00 = 0.000
754.700 - 738.135 ) = 0.000

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/155 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT TOP

at TOP of abutment
shaft

MT

kNm

0.00

222.41

0.00

222.41

0.18

0.18

29.54

29.54

0.12

0.12

5.82

5.82

0.12

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/156 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT TOP

0.12

0.12

0.12

0.18

0.18

5.88

5.88

170.52

222.41

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/157 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT TOP

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/158 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT TOP

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/159 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT TOP

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/160 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT TOP

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/161 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT TOP

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/162 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT TOP

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/163 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT TOP

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/164 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT TOP

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/165 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT TOP

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/166 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT TOP

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/167 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT TOP

KN
kNm

KN
kNm

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/168 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT BOTTOM

CALCULATION OF ULS FORCES FOR DESIGN OF ABUTMENT


Abutment shaft bottom lvl = 738.135 m

Case 1 : DL+SIDL-Normal Dry Case

Vertical
load factor MT
Load( P ) kN.
SELF WEIGHT 1.35 -13180.324 0
CRASH BARRIER 1.35 -286.162 0
SIDL WEARING COAT 1.75 -825.74 0
PASSIVE EARTH PRESSURE 1.5 -200.058 0
Total -19924.8881 0

Summary of Forces
P 19924.888 KN
ML 18232.122 kNm
MT 0.000 kNm

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/169 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT BOTTOM

Case 2 : DL+SIDL+LL-(Maximum Reaction Case)-Normal Dry Case

Vertical
load factor MT
Load( P ) kN.
SELF WEIGHT 1.35 -13180.324 0
CRASH BARRIER 1.35 -286.162 0
SIDL WEARING COAT 1.75 -825.74 0
PASSIVE EARTH PRESSURE 1.5 -200.058 0
LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE 1.2 -168.466 0
LIVE LOAD 1.5 1415.318 -127.100
BRAKING FORCE 1.5 -34.384 0
Total -18055.6463 -190.65

Summary of Forces
P 18055.646 KN
ML 19934.427 kNm
MT 190.650 kNm

Case 3 : DL+SIDL-Normal HFL Case

Vertical
load factor MT
Load( P ) kN.
SELF WEIGHT 1.35 -13180.324 0
CRASH BARRIER 1.35 -286.162 0
SIDL WEARING COAT 1.75 -825.74 0
PASSIVE EARTH PRESSURE HFL 1.5 -199.37 0
Total -19923.8561 0

Summary of Forces
P 19923.856 KN
ML 18321.402 kNm
MT 0.000 kNm

Case 4 : DL+SIDL+LL- (Minimum Reaction Case)-Normal HFL Case

Vertical
load factor MT
Load( P ) kN.
SELF WEIGHT 1.35 -13180.324 0

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/170 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT BOTTOM

CRASH BARRIER 1.35 -286.162 0


SIDL WEARING COAT 1.75 -825.74 0
PASSIVE EARTH PRESSURE HFL 1.5 -199.37 0
LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE 1.2 -168.466 0
LIVE LOAD 1.5 1415.318 -127.1
BRAKING FORCE 1.5 -34.384 0
Total -18054.6143 -190.65

Summary of Forces
P 18054.614 KN
ML 20023.707 kNm
MT 190.650 kNm

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/171 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT BOTTOM

Case 5 : DL+SIDL-Long. Seismic Dry Case

Vertical
load factor MT
Load( P ) kN.
SELF WEIGHT 1.35 -13180.324 0
CRASH BARRIER 1.35 -286.162 0
SIDL WEARING COAT 1.75 -825.74 0
ACTIVE EARTH PRESSURE 1.5 89.724 0
DUE TO DYNAMIC INCREMENT
OF EP 1.5 84.291 -0.43
LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE
DYNAMIC 1.2 119.6 0
SEISMIC LONGITUDIONAL 1.5 621.652 0
SEISMIC TRANSVERSE 1.5 932.478 1752.934
Total -16889.0639 2628.756

Summary of Forces
Seismic Seismic
Downward Upward
P 16889.064 16889.064 KN
ML 14667.393 14667.393 kNm
MT 2628.756 2628.756 kNm

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/172 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT BOTTOM

Case 6 : DL+SIDL+LL-(Maximum Reaction Case)-Long. Seismic Dry Cas

Vertical
load factor Load( P )
kN.
SELF WEIGHT 1.35 -13180.324
CRASH BARRIER 1.35 -286.162
SIDL WEARING COAT 1.75 -825.74
ACTIVE EARTH PRESSURE 1.5 89.724
DUE TO DYNAMIC INCREMENT
OF EP 1.5 84.291
LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE
DYNAMIC 1.2 119.6
LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE 1.2 -168.466
LIVE LOAD 0.2 1415.318
BRAKING FORCE 1.5 -34.384
SEISMIC LONGITUDIONAL 1.5 -17.940
SEISMIC TRANSVERSE 0.45 -264.614
Total -19336.917

Summary of Forces
Seismic Seismic
Downward Upward
P 19336.917 19336.917 KN
ML 22357.561 22357.561 kNm
MT 762.755 762.755 kNm

Case 7 : DL+SIDL-Long. Seismic HFL Case

Vertical
load factor Load( P )
kN.
SELF WEIGHT 1.35 -13180.324
CRASH BARRIER 1.35 -286.162
SIDL WEARING COAT 1.75 -825.74
ACTIVE EARTH PRESSURE HFL 1.5 89.344
DUE TO DYNAMIC INCREMENT
OF EP 1.5 84.291
LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE
DYNAMIC 1.2 119.6
SEISMIC LONGITUDIONAL 1.5 619.611959
SEISMIC TRANSVERSE 0.45 929.417938
Total -17873.173

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/173 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT BOTTOM

Summary of Forces Seismic Seismic


Downward Upward
P 17873.173 17873.173 KN
ML 14709.033 14709.033 kNm
MT 788.175 788.175 kNm

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/174 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT BOTTOM

Case 8 : DL+SIDL+LL- (Minimum Reaction Case)-Long. Seismic HFL Ca

Vertical
load factor Load( P )
kN.
SELF WEIGHT 1.35 -13180.324
CRASH BARRIER 1.35 -286.162
SIDL WEARING COAT 1.75 -825.74
ACTIVE EARTH PRESSURE HFL 1.5 89.344
DUE TO DYNAMIC INCREMENT
OF EP 1.5 84.291
LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE
DYNAMIC 1.2 119.6
LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE 1.2 -168.466
LIVE LOAD 0.2 28.011
BRAKING FORCE 1.5 -34.384
SEISMIC LONGITUDIONAL 1.5 619.611959
SEISMIC TRANSVERSE 0.45 929.417938
Total -18121.306

Summary of Forces
Seismic Seismic
Downward Upward
P 18121.306 18121.306 KN
ML 21384.098 21384.098 kNm
MT 793.883 793.883 kNm

Case 9 : DL+SIDL-Trans. Seismic Dry Case

Vertical
load factor MT
Load( P ) kN.
SELF WEIGHT 1.35 -13180.324 0
CRASH BARRIER 1.35 -286.162 0
SIDL WEARING COAT 1.75 -825.74 0
ACTIVE EARTH PRESSURE 1.5 89.724 0
DUE TO DYNAMIC INCREMENT
OF EP 1.5 84.291 -0.43
LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE
DYNAMIC 1.2 119.6 0
SEISMIC LONGITUDIONAL 1.5 621.6519216 0
SEISMIC TRANSVERSE 0.45 932.4778824 1752.934
Total -17868.1657 788.1753

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/175 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT BOTTOM

Summary of Forces
Seismic Seismic
Downward Upward
P 17868.166 17868.166 KN
ML 14667.393 14667.393 kNm
MT 788.175 788.175 kNm

Case 10 : DL+SIDL+LL-(Maximum Reaction Case)-Trans. Seismic Dry C

Vertical
load factor Load( P )
kN.
SELF WEIGHT 1.35 -13180.324
CRASH BARRIER 1.35 -286.162
SIDL WEARING COAT 1.75 -825.74
ACTIVE EARTH PRESSURE HFL 1.5 89.344
DUE TO DYNAMIC INCREMENT
OF EP 1.5 84.291
LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE
DYNAMIC 1.2 119.6
SEISMIC LONGITUDIONAL 1.5 619.611959
SEISMIC TRANSVERSE 0.45 929.417938
Total -17873.173

Summary of Forces
Seismic Seismic
Downward Upward
P 17873.173 17873.173 KN
ML 14709.033 14709.033 kNm
MT 788.175 788.175 kNm

Case 11 : DL+SIDL-Trans. Seismic HFL Case

Vertical
load factor MT
Load( P ) kN.
SELF WEIGHT 1.35 -13180.324 0
CRASH BARRIER 1.35 -286.162 0
SIDL WEARING COAT 1.75 -825.74 0

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/176 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT BOTTOM

ACTIVE EARTH PRESSURE HFL 1.5 89.344 0


DUE TO DYNAMIC INCREMENT
OF EP 1.5 84.291 -0.43
LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE
DYNAMIC 1.2 119.6 0
SEISMIC LONGITUDIONAL 0.45 619.6119587 0
SEISMIC TRANSVERSE 1.5 929.4179381 1752.934
Total -17547.8763 2628.756

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/177 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT BOTTOM

Summary of Forces
Seismic Seismic
Downward Upward
P 17547.876 17547.876 KN
ML 15295.227 15295.227 kNm
MT 2628.756 2628.756 kNm

Case 12 : DL+SIDL+LL- (Minimum Reaction Case)-Trans. Seismic HFL C

Vertical
load factor MT
Load( P ) kN.
SELF WEIGHT 1.35 -13180.32 0.00
CRASH BARRIER 1.35 -286.16 0.00
SIDL WEARING COAT 1.75 -825.74 0.00
ACTIVE EARTH PRESSURE HFL 1.5 89.34 0.00
DUE TO DYNAMIC INCREMENT
OF EP 1.5 84.29 -0.43
LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE
DYNAMIC 1.2 119.60 0.00
LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE 1.2 -168.47 0.00
LIVE LOAD 0.2 28.01 28.54
BRAKING FORCE 1.5 -34.38 0.00
SEISMIC LONGITUDIONAL 0.45 619.61 0.00
SEISMIC TRANSVERSE 1.5 929.42 1752.93
Total -17796.01 2634.46

Summary of Forces
Seismic Seismic
Downward Upward
P 17796.009 17796.009 KN
ML 21970.292 21970.292 kNm
MT 2634.464 2634.464 kNm

Case 13 : DL+SIDL+LL+ Temperature Case

Vertical
load factor MT
Load( P ) kN.

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/178 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT BOTTOM

SELF WEIGHT 1.35 -13180.324 0


CRASH BARRIER 1.35 -286.162 0
SIDL WEARING COAT 1.75 -825.74 0
PASSIVE EARTH PRESSURE 1.5 -200.058 0
LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE 1.2 -168.466 0
LIVE LOAD 1.15 1415.318 -127.1
BRAKING FORCE 1.15 -34.384 0
TEMPERATURE 1.5 -24.58 0
Total -18538.9732 -146.165

Summary of Forces
P 18538.973 KN
ML 21258.971 kNm
MT 146.165 kNm

Centrifugal Force : Normal Case


Centrifugal Force (C.F.) = 1.50 x
Transverse Moment due to C.F. = 0.000 x (

Centrifugal Force : Seismic Case


Centrifugal Force (C.F.) = 0.20 x
Transverse Moment due to C.F. = 0.000 x (

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/179 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT BOTTOM

Summary of ULS Forces for Design of Abutment Shaft

Total forces at bottom of abutme


shaft

LOAD CASES P ML

Normal Dry Case kN kNm

Case 1 : DL+SIDL-Normal Dry


19924.89 18232.12
Case

Case 2 : DL+SIDL+LL-(Maximum
18055.65 19934.43
Reaction Case)-Normal Dry Case

Normal HFLCase

Case 3 : DL+SIDL-Normal HFL


19923.86 18321.40
Case

Case 4 : DL+SIDL+LL- (Minimum


18054.61 20023.71
Reaction Case)-Normal HFL Case

Longitudinal Seismic Dry Case

DN 16889.06 14667.39
Case 5 : DL+SIDL-Long. Seismic
Dry Case
UP 16889.06 14667.39

Case 6 : DL+SIDL+LL-(Maximum DN 19336.92 22357.56


Reaction Case)-Long. Seismic Dry
Case UP 19336.92 22357.56

Longitudinal Seismic HFL Case

DN 17873.17 14709.03
Case 7 : DL+SIDL-Long. Seismic
HFL Case
UP 17873.17 14709.03

Case 8 : DL+SIDL+LL- (Minimum DN 18121.31 21384.10


Reaction Case)-Long. Seismic HFL
Case UP 18121.31 21384.10

Transverse Seismic Dry Case

DN 17868.17 14667.39
Case 9 : DL+SIDL-Trans. Seismic
Dry Case
NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/180 Minor Bridge at 116+490
Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT BOTTOM
Case 9 : DL+SIDL-Trans. Seismic
Dry Case
UP 17868.17 14667.39

Case 10 : DL+SIDL+LL-(Maximum DN 17873.17 14709.03


Reaction Case)-Trans. Seismic Dry
Case UP 17873.17 14709.03

Transverse Seismic HFL Case

DN 17547.88 15295.23
Case 11 : DL+SIDL-Trans. Seismic
HFL Case
UP 17547.88 15295.23

Case 12 : DL+SIDL+LL- (Minimum DN 17796.01 21970.29


Reaction Case)-Trans. Seismic
HFL Case UP 17796.01 21970.29

Case 13 : DL+SIDL+LL+
18538.97 21258.97
Temperature Case

MAX = 19924.89 22357.56

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/181 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT BOTTOM

OF ABUTMENT SHAFT

ML

9314.94
606.74
1424.28
-22745.92
-18232.122

15366.962987
54813.247682
4.640625E-05

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/182 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT BOTTOM

mal Dry Case

ML

9314.94
606.74
1424.28
-22745.92
-6149.1
3317.710
466.7
-19934.427

ML

9314.94
606.74
1424.28
-22805.44
-18321.402

mal HFL Case

ML

9314.94

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/183 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT BOTTOM

606.74
1424.28
-22805.44
-6149.1
3317.71
466.7
-20023.707

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/184 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT BOTTOM

-932.478

ML

9314.94
606.74
1424.28
-10173.54

-7261.79

-4365.48
558.28
0
-14667.393

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/185 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT BOTTOM

. Seismic Dry Case

MT ML

0 9314.94
0 606.74
0 1424.28
0 -10173.54

-0.43 -7261.79

0 -4365.48
0 -6149.1
-127.1 3317.71
0 466.7
0 -558.28
1752.934 0
762.7553 -22357.561

16651.0132 14558.31974
84514.3108 84156.15846
19442.0348 19442.03475

MT ML

0 9314.94
0 606.74
0 1424.28
0 -10201.3

-0.43 -7261.79

0 -4365.48
0 558.28
1752.934 0
788.1753 -14709.033

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/186 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT BOTTOM

16338.7175 14305.98188
79041.2045 78698.84395
18226.1268 18226.12683

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/187 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT BOTTOM

. Seismic HFL Case

MT ML

0 9314.94
0 606.74
0 1424.28
0 -10201.3

-0.43 -7261.79

0 -4365.48
0 -6149.1
28.540 19.027
0 466.7
0 558.28
1752.934 0
793.88330254 -21384.0977

16385.3863 14343.34609
82672.8022 82327.65028
18442.1762 18442.17618

ML

9314.94
606.74
1424.28
-10173.54

-7261.79

-4365.48
558.28
0
-14667.393

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/188 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT BOTTOM

ns. Seismic Dry Case

MT ML

0 9314.94
0 606.74
0 1424.28
0 -10201.3

-0.43 -7261.79

0 -4365.48
0 558.28
1752.934 0
788.1753 -14709.033

16651.0132 14558.31974
65468.524 65110.37166
63963.984 63963.98404

ML

9314.94
606.74
1424.28

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/189 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT BOTTOM

-10201.3

-7261.79

-4365.48
558.28
0
-15295.227

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/190 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT BOTTOM

16338.7175 14305.98188
61192.9254 60850.56488
60753.756 60753.756

ns. Seismic HFL Case

ML

9314.94
606.74
1424.28
-10201.30

-7261.79

-4365.48
-6149.10
19.03
466.70
558.28
0.00
-21970.29

16385.3863 14343.34609
63861.8915 63516.7396
61237.1928 61237.19284

ML

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/191 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT BOTTOM

9314.94
606.74
1424.28
-22745.92
-6149.1
3317.71
466.7
-4372.448
-21258.9705

0.00 = 0.000
754.700 - 738.135 ) = 0.000

0.00 = 0.000
754.700 - 738.135 ) = 0.000

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/192 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT BOTTOM

t bottom of abutment
shaft

MT

kNm

0.00

190.65

0.00

190.65

2628.76

2628.76

762.76

762.76

788.18

788.18

793.88

793.88

788.18

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/193 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT BOTTOM

788.18

788.18

788.18

2628.76

2628.76

2634.46

2634.46

146.17

2634.46

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/194 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT BOTTOM

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/195 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT BOTTOM

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/196 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT BOTTOM

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/197 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT BOTTOM

23.499

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/198 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT BOTTOM

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/199 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT BOTTOM

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/200 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT BOTTOM

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/201 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT BOTTOM

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/202 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT BOTTOM

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/203 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT BOTTOM

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/204 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT FORCES FOR SHAFT BOTTOM

KN
kNm

KN
kNm

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/205 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Design of Rectangular Wall

Design of Wall:
Material Property:
Grade of Concrete = M 40
fck = 40 N/mm2
fcd = 17.867 N/mm2
Grade of steel = Fe 500
fy = 500 N/mm2
fyd = 434.783 N/mm2
Es = 200000.00 N/mm2

Cross section of Wall:


Thickness of Wall (B) = 1.500 m
Depth of Wall (D) = 12.500 m
Area of Concrete (Ac) = 18.750 m2

Clear Cover to earth faces = 75 mm


Clear Cover to non earth faces = 50 mm
Maximum Dia of Vertical Reinf. = 32 mm
Dia of Horizontal Reinf. = 20 mm

As per Clause 7.6.4.1 of IRC:112-2011


Ultimate axial force (Pu) = 11919.23 kN

0.1 fcd Ac = 0.1 x 17.87 x 18750000


= 33500000 N
= 33500.00 kN

Since Axial Force is less than axial capacity of section , Section will design as
bending element . Neglecting axial force

PART 1: LONGITUDINAL MOMENT : VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT ON EARTH


FACE
Ultimate Design bending moment (ML) = 66627.52 kNm =

Check For Depth of Wall :


Mult = 0.165 x fck x b x d^2
= 5330.20 kNm/m

b = 1000.00 mm

Effective Depth Required (dreq) 5330.20 x 1000000


= SQRT( )
0.165 x 40.00 x 1000

(dreq) = 898.669 mm

Total Depth Required ( Dreq) = 1009.67 mm


Total Depth Provided (Dprov) = 1500.00 mm OK
Effective depth provided(deff) = 1389 mm

R= Mu/(b d^2) = 2.76

Minimum Longitudinal Reinforcement in wall on each face


= 0.0012 x bxD
Ast min = 1800.00 mm2/m

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/206 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Design of Rectangular Wall

Area of Steel Required:


pt = Astreq = fck { 1 - sqrt( 1- 4.598 R/fck) }
100 bD 2 fy
= 0.0070
Astreq = 10434.636 mm2/m

Ast required = max( Astmin, Astreq) = 10434.64 mm2/m


Total are of steel required in full length = 130432.95 mm2

Provide 32 mm dia @ 110.00 mm c/c =


14622.69
Provide 32 mm dia @ 110.00 mm c/c =

Effective length of shaft = 12254 mm


Calculation of reinforcement in numbers
Provide 32 mm dia - 111.00 nos =
179347.24
Provide 32 mm dia - 112.00 nos =

Percentage of steel = 0.957 %

Check for Moment of Resistance of Section due to Steel


Limiting Depth of Neutral Axis , Xm = 0.0035 . d
( 0.0035 + fyd/ Es)

= 0.0035 x 1389.00
0.0035 + 0.0022

= 856.82 mm
Depth of Neutral Axis , X = fyd . Ast
0.36 . fck . b

= 434.78 x 14622.69
0.36 x 40.00 x 1000.00

= 441.51 mm OK

Lever Arm ( z ) between Compressive Force ( C) and Tensile Force ( T)

z = d - 0.416 . X
= 1389.00 - 183.67
= 1205.33 mm

Moment of Resistance of Section w.r.t. Steel ( MR)

MR = fyd . Ast . z

= 434.78 x 14622.69 x 1205.33

= 7.66E+09 Nmm /m

= 7663.14 kNm/m > 5330.20 kNm/m

Moment of Resistance of Wall is More than Design Bending Moment , HENCE Wall IS SAFE IN
BENDING

LONGITUDINAL REINFORCEMENT ON NON EARTH FACE


Minimum Longitudinal Reinforcement in wall on each face

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/207 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Design of Rectangular Wall

= 0.0012 x bxD
Ast min = 1800.00 mm2/m
= 22500.00 mm2

Provide 25 mm dia @ 110.00 mm c/c = 4462.49

Calculation of reinforcement in numbers


Provide 25 mm dia @ 111.00 nos = 54487.00

PART 3 : HORIZONTAL REINFORCEMENT CALCULATION

Horizontal Reinforcement for wall


maximum of following = 0.2500 x 19085.18 = 4771.294
= 0.001 x 1.50E+06 = 1500.000
Maximum Horizontal Reinf. 4771 mm2 per meter

Min dia of bar = 0.250 x 32 = 8


or 8 mm

Maximum Spacing between <= 300 mm c/c

2 Legged 20 dia @ 100 c/c = 6283.185

Confinement Reinforcement

As per Clause 17.2.1.3 (Note 2)of IRC:112-2011


Distance between links or ties (ST) = 1/3 x 1335 =
or 200.00 mm

Governing Spacing = 200.00 mm

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/208 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Design of Rectangular Wall
As per Clause 17.2.1.3 (Note 1)of IRC:112-2011
The Spacing of hoops and ties in the longitudinal direction (SL)
SL = 5 x 32 =
or 1/5 x 1335 =
Min = 100 mm

2 Legged 20 dia @ 100 c/c = 6283.185


38 Legged 10 dia @ 100 c/c = 29845.130
54 links 10 dia @ 100 c/c = 42411.501
78539.816

Minimum Confinement Reinforrcement:

nk = NED = 11919231.8 = 0.0159


Ak fck 750000000
AC = 18.750 mm2
ACC = 1.375 x 12.400 = 17.050 mm2
rL = 0.00959 per meter
rL = 0.11994
fyd = 434.783
fcd = 17.867

AC f yd
wwd.req = 0.37  k + 0.13 ( r L - 0.01)
ACC f cd

ωwd.req = 0.3543
wwd = max ( wwd,req , 0.12) = 0.3543

As per Clause 17.2.1.1 (4) of IRC:112-2011

Confined Reinforcement = w wd = r w f yd / f cd where ,

Volumetric ratio,
Asw = 78539.82 mm2
SL = 100.000 mm
b = 1335.000 mm
rw = 0.588
wwd.c = 14.317

wwd,c ≥ wwd as per equation 17.7 of IRC:112-2011

w wd,c = 14.32 OK

Length of Potential Plastic Hinges Refer clause 17.2.1.4 of IRC:112-2011

nk = NED = 0.0159 < 0.24


Ak fck

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/209 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Design of Rectangular Wall

5330.20 kNm/m

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/210 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Design of Rectangular Wall

mm2/m OK

mm2 OK

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/211 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Design of Rectangular Wall

mm2/m OK

mm2 OK

As per IRC: 112-2011 , Clause


16.3.2

mm

mm2 OK

445

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/212 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Design of Rectangular Wall

160 mm
267 mm

mm2
mm2 OK
mm2
mm2

as per equation 17.7 of IRC:112-2011

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/213 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Crack for shaft -Circular

SLS CHECK OF ABUTMENT SHAFT-CIRCULAR TYPE

Abutment shaft bottom lvl = 738.135 m

Case 1 : DL+SIDL-Normal Case


Forces due to Vertical Load
Unit Vertical ML =
Load Volume Long. Ecc. Trans. Ecc MT = PxeT
Loads Weights Load( P ) PxeL1
Factor (m3) (eL1) (m) (eT) (m) (kNm)
(kN/m3) kN. (kNm)

Superstructure
Dead Load 1.00 4806.544 0.000 0.481 0.000 0.000
SIDL except Wearing Course 1.00 289.806 0.000 0.029 0.000 0.000
Wearing Course 1.00 834.372 0.000 0.083 0.000 0.000
Bearing Pedestal 1.00 25 0.000 0.000 0.0001 0.000 1.375 0.000

Substructure & Foundation


Dirt Wall-Uniform portion 1.00 25 0.000 0.000 -0.750 0.000 0.000 0.000
Dirt Wall-Tapered portion 1.00 25 0.002 0.039 -0.600 -0.023 0.000 0.000
Bracket - Uniform portion 1.00 25 1.125 28.125 -0.900 -25.313 0.000 0.000
Bracket - Tapered portion 1.00 25 0.563 14.063 -0.850 -11.953 0.000 0.000
Cap - (uniform portion) 1.00 25 0.000 0.000 -0.750 0.000 0.000 0.000
Cap - (corbel portion) 1.00 25 0.000 0.000 -0.750 0.000 0.000 0.000
Abutment Shaft 1.00 25 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
RCC Railing or Crash Barrier or
1.00 25 28.000 -0.750 -20.999 0.000 0.000
Crash Barrier
Aproach Slab 1.00 25 6.563 164.063 -0.900 -147.656 0.000 0.000
Total 6165.011 -205.351 0.000

Forces due to Horizontal Load


Horizontal R.L. of Moment @
load factor
Force (KN) Force (m) Shaft (kNm)
due to Superstructure 0.000 749.291 0.000
due to Earth pressure 1.00 16448.500 35265.574

P 6165.011 KN
ML 35060.223 kNm
MT 0.000 kNm

Case 2 : DL+SIDL+LL-Normal Case (Maximum Reaction Case)


Forces due to Vertical Load
Vertical
Load Long. Ecc. ML = PxeL1 Trans. Ecc MT = PxeT
Loads Load( P )
Factor (eL1) (m) (kNm) (eT) (m) (kNm)
kN.

Forces from Case 1:DL+SIDL 6165.011 -205.351 0.000


CWLL-Max. Reaction case 1.00 1188.518 0.000 0.119 1.520 1805.996

Total 7353.528 -205.232 1805.997

Forces due to Horizontal Load


ML @ Shaft
load factor Horizontal R.L. of (kNm)
Force (KN) Force (m)
due to Superstructure 113.850 749.291 1270.139
due to Earth pressure 1.00 16448.500 35265.574
due to Live load surcharge 0.80 1508.496 3889.080

P 7353.528 KN
ML 40219.561 kNm
MT 1805.997 kNm

Case 3 : DL+SIDL+LL-Normal Case (Max Transv. Moment Case)


Forces due to Vertical Load
Vertical
Load Long. Ecc. ML = PxeL1 Trans. Ecc MT = PxeT
Loads Load( P )
Factor (eL1) (m) (kNm) (eT) (m) (kNm)
kN.

Forces from Case 1:DL+SIDL 6165.011 -205.351 0.000


CWLL-Max. Transv. Moment case 1.00 801.590 0.000 0.080 3.155 2529.015

Total 6966.600 -205.271 2529.015

Forces due to Horizontal Load

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/214 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Crack for shaft -Circular
Horizontal R.L. of ML @ Shaft
load factor
Force (KN) Force (m) (kNm)
due to Superstructure 113.850 749.291 1270.139
due to Earth pressure 1.00 16448.500 35265.574
due to Live load surcharge 0.80 1508.496 3889.080

P 6966.600 KN
ML 40219.523 kNm
MT 2529.015 kNm

Total forces at bottom of Design forces at bottom of each


abutment shaft abutment shaft

LOAD CASES P ML MT P ML MT

Normal Case kN kNm kNm kN kNm kNm


CASE 1: DL+SIDL 6165.011 35060.223 0.000 6165.011 35060.223 0.000
CASE 2: DL+SIDL+LL
(Max Reaction Case) 7353.528 40219.561 1805.997 7353.528 40219.561 1805.997
CASE 3 : DL+SIDL+LL
(Max Transv. Moment Case) 6966.600 40219.523 2529.015 6966.600 40219.523 2529.015

MAX= 7353.528 40219.561 2529.015

Design Input:

Creep Coeff = 1.2 For Dry atmosperic condition

Ecm = 33345.76 N/mm2


Es = 200000.00 N/mm2
Eceff = Ecm = 1.52E+04
(1 + ø )

Modular Ratio (m) = Es/ Eceff = 13.20

Bending Moment, M = 40219.56 kNm


Circular section
Diameter of section = 1.50 m
Area of section = 1.77 m2
Section Modulus (ZL) of uncracked section = 0.33 m3
Bending Stress ( M/ZL) = 121.385 N/mm2
Tensile stress of concrete , fctm = 3.029 N/mm2
Cracked or Uncracked Section = Cracked
Section properties of Cracked section:
Note: Stresses under Service load are usually within Linear Elastic Range hence such analysis involved use of
Modulus ratio.
Clear Cover, c = 75.000 mm
Maximum dia used (Vertical), f = 32.000 mm
Horizontal Reinf. Dia used = 16.000 mm
Effective Diameter = 1286.000 mm
Ast provided = 6475.000 mm2
Percentage of steel , pt = 0.0037
k=sqrt{ 2 pt *m + (pt*m)^2 } - pt* m = 0.266
Depth of neutral axis from extreme Compression face ( yc = k
* dy) = 342.524 mm

Depth of neutral axis from extreme tension face ( yt = dy-yc) = 943.476 mm

Depth of neutral axis from c.g. of tension steel ( ys) = 836.476 mm

Dx *(k * dy)^3/3 + m Ast * (dy - k * dy)^2


Cracked moment of Inertia (Icr) =
Icr = 1.342E+11 mm4

Maximum compressive stress in concrete = 102.676 >19.2SAFE


Maximum tensile stress in concrete = 282.818
Maximum Tensile stress in steel = 3308.583 >300SAFE
Check For Crack Width
Crack width , Wk = Sr max (εsm - εcm)

Above Formula For Calculation of Sr max is applicable if the spacing between the reinf. is less or equal to
5*(c+φ/2)
5*(c+φ/2) = 455.000 mm
NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/215 Minor Bridge at 116+490
Design Calculation ICT Crack for shaft -Circular
Provided Spacing = 110.000 mm
Check for Applicability of Formula = OK
0.425 k1 k2 φ
Maximum crack spacing , Sr max = 3.4 c +
r r ef
K1 = 0.800 for deformed bars
K2 = 0.500 for bending
depth of neutral axis , yc = 342.524 mm
, where Ac,eff =effective area of
r r eff = As/Ac eff = concrete in tension surrounding the
reinf.
hc eff = Min of 2.5 (Dy - dy ) ,Dy - yc/3 , Dy/2 = 883.573 mm
Ac, eff = Dx * hc,eff = 1325359.401 mm
r r eff = As/Ac eff = 0.007
Maximum crack spacing , Sr max = 997.338 mm
σsc - kt fct eff (1 + αe r r ef )
(εsm - εcm) / Es
= r r eff
tensile stress in steel, ,σsc = 3308.583 N/mm2
Kt = 0.500
Tensile strength of concrete = fct eff = fctm = 3.029 N/mm2
αe = Es/Ecm = 5.998
(εsm - εcm) = 0.01546
Crack width , Wk=Sr max (εsm - εcm) = 15.423
Check = CHECK

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/216 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Crack for shaft -Rectangle sect

SLS CHECK OF ABUTMENT SHAFT

Abutment shaft bottom lvl = 738.135 m

Case 1 : DL+SIDL-Normal Case


Forces due to Vertical Load
Unit Vertical ML =
Load Volume Long. Ecc. Trans. Ecc MT = PxeT
Loads Weights Load( P ) PxeL1
Factor (m3) (eL1) (m) (eT) (m) (kNm)
(kN/m3) kN. (kNm)

Superstructure
Dead Load 1.00 4806.544 0.000 0.481 0.000 0.000
SIDL except Wearing Course 1.00 289.806 0.000 0.029 0.000 0.000
Wearing Course 1.00 834.372 0.000 0.083 0.000 0.000
Bearing Pedestal 1.00 25 0.000 0.000 0.0001 0.000 1.375 0.000

Substructure & Foundation


Dirt Wall-Uniform portion 1.00 25 0.000 0.000 -0.750 0.000 0.000 0.000
Dirt Wall-Tapered portion 1.00 25 0.002 0.039 -0.600 -0.023 0.000 0.000
Bracket - Uniform portion 1.00 25 1.125 28.125 -0.900 -25.313 0.000 0.000
Bracket - Tapered portion 1.00 25 0.563 14.063 -0.850 -11.953 0.000 0.000
Cap - (uniform portion) 1.00 25 0.000 0.000 -0.750 0.000 0.000 0.000
Cap - (corbel portion) 1.00 25 0.000 0.000 -0.750 0.000 0.000 0.000
Abutment Shaft 1.00 25 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
RCC Railing or Crash Barrier or
25 28.000 -0.750 -20.999 0.000 0.000
Crash Barrier 1.00
Aproach Slab 1.00 25 6.563 164.063 -0.900 -147.656 0.000 0.000
Total 6165.011 -205.351 0.000

Forces due to Horizontal Load


Horizontal R.L. of Moment @
load factor
Force (KN) Force (m) Shaft (kNm)
due to Superstructure 0.000 749.291 0.000
due to Earth pressure 1.00 16448.500 35265.574

P 6165.011 KN
ML 35060.223 kNm
MT 0.000 kNm

Case 2 : DL+SIDL+LL-Normal Case (Maximum Reaction Case)


Forces due to Vertical Load
Vertical
Load Long. Ecc. ML = PxeL1 Trans. Ecc MT = PxeT
Loads Load( P )
Factor (eL1) (m) (kNm) (eT) (m) (kNm)
kN.

Forces from Case 1:DL+SIDL 6165.011 -205.351 0.000


CWLL-Max. Reaction case 1.00 1188.518 0.000 0.119 1.520 1805.996

Total 7353.528 -205.232 1805.997

Forces due to Horizontal Load


ML @ Shaft
load factor Horizontal R.L. of (kNm)
Force (KN) Force (m)
due to Superstructure 113.850 749.291 1270.139
due to Earth pressure 1.00 16448.500 35265.574
due to Live load surcharge 0.80 1508.496 3889.080

P 7353.528 KN
ML 40219.561 kNm
MT 1805.997 kNm

Case 3 : DL+SIDL+LL-Normal Case (Max Transv. Moment Case)


Forces due to Vertical Load
Vertical
Load Long. Ecc. ML = PxeL1 Trans. Ecc MT = PxeT
Loads Load( P )
Factor (eL1) (m) (kNm) (eT) (m) (kNm)
kN.

Forces from Case 1:DL+SIDL 6165.011 -205.351 0.000


CWLL-Max. Transv. Moment case 1.00 801.590 0.000 0.080 3.155 2529.015

Total 6966.600 -205.271 2529.015

Forces due to Horizontal Load

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/217 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Crack for shaft -Rectangle sect
Horizontal R.L. of ML @ Shaft
load factor
Force (KN) Force (m) (kNm)
due to Superstructure 113.850 749.291 1270.139
due to Earth pressure 1.00 16448.500 35265.574
due to Live load surcharge 0.80 1508.496 3889.080

P 6966.600 KN
ML 40219.523 kNm
MT 2529.015 kNm

Total forces at bottom of Design forces at bottom of each


abutment shaft abutment shaft

LOAD CASES P ML MT P ML MT

Normal Case kN kNm kNm kN kNm kNm


CASE 1: DL+SIDL 6165.011 35060.223 0.000 6165.011 35060.223 0.000
CASE 2: DL+SIDL+LL
(Max Reaction Case) 7353.528 40219.561 1805.997 7353.528 40219.561 1805.997
CASE 3 : DL+SIDL+LL
(Max Transv. Moment Case) 6966.600 40219.523 2529.015 6966.600 40219.523 2529.015

MAX= 7353.528 40219.561 2529.015

Design Input:

Creep Coeff = 1.2 For Dry atmosperic condition

Ecm = 33345.76 N/mm2


Es = 200000.00 N/mm2
Eceff = Ecm = 1.52E+04
(1 + ø )

Modular Ratio (m) = Es/ Eceff = 13.20

Bending Moment, M = 40219.56 kNm


Rectangular section
Dx = 12.50 m
Dy = 1.20 m
Section Modulus (ZL) of uncracked section = 3.00 m3
Bending Stress ( M/ZL) = 13.407 N/mm2
Tensile stress of concrete , fctm = 3.029 N/mm2
Cracked or Uncracked Section = Cracked
Section properties of Cracked section:
Note: Stresses under Service load are usually within Linear Elastic Range hence such analysis involved use of
Modulus ratio.
Clear Cover, c = 75.000 mm
Maximum dia used (Vertical), f = 32.000 mm
Horizontal Reinf. Dia used = 20.000 mm
Effective Depth deff (dy) = 1389.000 mm
Ast provided = 14622.686 mm2/m
Percentage of steel , pt = 0.0096
k=sqrt{ 2 pt *m + (pt*m)^2 } - pt* m = 0.392
Depth of neutral axis from extreme Compression face ( yc = k
* dy) = 544.235 mm

Depth of neutral axis from extreme tension face ( yt = dy-yc) = 844.765 mm

Depth of neutral axis from c.g. Of tesnion steel ( ys) = 733.765 mm

Cracked moment of Inertia (Icr) = Dx *(k * dy)^3/3 + m Ast * (dy - k * dy)^2


Icr = 2.393E+12 mm4

Maximum compressive stress in concrete = 9.148 < 19.2, SAFE


Maximum tensile stress in concrete = 14.199
Maximum Tensile stress in steel = 162.741 < 300, SAFE
Check For Crack Width
Crack width , Wk = Sr max (εsm - εcm)

Above Formula For Calculation of Sr max is applicable if the spacing between the reinf. is less or equal to
5*(c+φ/2)
5*(c+φ/2) = 455.000 mm
NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/218 Minor Bridge at 116+490
Design Calculation ICT Crack for shaft -Rectangle sect
Provided Spacing = 110.000 mm
Check for Applicability of Formula = OK
0.425 k1 k2 φ
Maximum crack spacing , Sr max = 3.4 c +
r r ef
K1 = 0.800 for deformed bars
K2 = 0.500 for bending
depth of neutral axis , yc = 544.235 mm
, where Ac,eff =effective area of
r r eff = As/Ac eff = concrete in tension surrounding the
reinf.
hc eff = Min of 2.5 (Dy - dy ) ,Dy - yc/3 , Dy/2 = -472.500 mm
Ac, eff = Dx * hc,eff = -5906250.000 mm
r r eff = As/Ac eff = -0.031
Maximum crack spacing , Sr max = 79.218 mm
σsc - kt fct eff (1 + αe r r ef )
(εsm - εcm) / Es
= r r eff
tensile stress in steel, ,σsc = 162.741 N/mm2
Kt = 0.500
Tensile strength of concrete = fct eff = fctm = 3.029 N/mm2
αe = Es/Ecm = 5.998
(εsm - εcm) = 0.00101
Crack width , Wk=Sr max (εsm - εcm) = 0.080
Check = SAFE

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/219 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Abutment Cap -Staad
Designe
Project #REF! Vishal
d by:

Summet
Client GALFAR ENGINEERING & CONTRACTING (INDIA) PVT. LTD. Checke
Khanna
d by:
Date &
Job Name DESIGN OF ABUTMENT (A1) AND FOUNDATION FOR ROB AT CH. 211+865 17/07/201
Rev.
3 (R1)

DESIGN OF ABUTMENT CAP


Width of Abutment cap (Long direction) = 0.000 m
Length of Abutment cap of Uniform portion = 12.500 m
Length of Abutment cap at bottom of Tapering portion = 12.50 m
Width/Diameter of Abutment (Long Direction) = 1.500 m
Length of Abutment Uniform Portion = 12.500 m
Circular cut-water diameter = 0.00 m 0.00 m
Length/Diameter of Abutment (Trans Direction) = 12.50 m
Equivalent Size of Abutment = 0.00 m
Thickness of Uniform Portion of Cap = 0.30 m
Thickness of Tapering Portion of Cap = 0.30 m

Long. Eccentricity of Bearings@ C/L of


= 0.000 m
Support
c/c Distance between bearing (Trans) = 5.00 m
No of Bearing for one span = 0.00 Nos.

Volumnn of Cantilever portion of cap = 0.00 m3


C.g. of Cap from face of Abutment = #DIV/0! m
Density of concrete = 25.00 kN/m3
C.g. of Pedestal from face of Abutment = -1.25 m
C.g. of Long. Arrestor from face of Abutment shaft = -2.75 m
C.g. of Trans. Arrestor from face of Abutment shaft = -0.38 m
Centre distance of jack from face of Abutment shaft = -2.05 m

Transverse Direction
1250 5000 5000 1250

12500
12500

Direction of Traffic
Longitudinal
Direction

Movement
L1 1500 L3 L4 0

0
12500

300.00

300.00

0 6350 0.00 6350 0

12700.00

Area of circle = 1.77 m


size of incribed square = 1.33 m

Volume Calculation of Cap:

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/220 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Abutment Cap -Staad
Designe
Project #REF! Vishal
d by:

Summet
Client GALFAR ENGINEERING & CONTRACTING (INDIA) PVT. LTD. Checke
Khanna
d by:
Date &
Job Name DESIGN OF ABUTMENT (A1) AND FOUNDATION FOR ROB AT CH. 211+865 17/07/201
Rev.
3 (R1)

Volume weight
L (m) B (m) D (m)
Load factor Nos ( m3) (kN)
Cantilever Rectangular 1.350 1 0.000 0.000 0.300 0.000 0.000
portion-1 Traingular 1.350 1 0.000 0.000 0.300 0.000 0.000
Cantilever Rectangular 1.350 1 0.000 0.000 0.300 0.000 0.000
portion-2 Traingular 1.350 1 0.000 0.000 0.300 0.000 0.000
Straight portion 1.350 1 12.700 0.000 0.600 0.000 0.000
0.000 KN

Load on
Bearing 1 Bearing 2 Bearing 3
bearing Load factor
DL 1.350 1521.350 1723.067 1723.067
SIDL (without
152.580 43.039 43.039
W.C.) 1.350
W.C. 1.750 504.662 225.414 225.414
CWLL 1.500 56.111 1128.627 569.113
2234.702 3120.147 2560.633

Reaction on Abutment 1 R1 = 3794.78 KN


Reaction on Abutment 1 R2 = 4120.71 KN

Moment @ Centre of Abutment 1 :

Moment due to bearing 1 = 2234.70 x -6.350 = -14190.356 kNm


Moment due to bearing 2 = 3120.15 x 0.000 = 0.000 kNm
Moment due to bearing 3 = 2560.63 x 5.000 = 12803.166 kNm
Moment due to cantilever portion-Rect. = 0.00 x -3.175 = 0.000 kNm
Moment due to cantilever portion-Triangle = 0.00 x -6.350 = 0.000 kNm
Moment due to Straight portion = 0.00 x 0.000 = 0.000 kNm
Moment due to cantilever portion-Rect. = 0.00 x 6.350 = 0.000 kNm
Moment due to cantilever portion-Triangle = 0.00 x 6.350 = 0.000 kNm
Moment due to R2 = -4120.71 x 0.000 = 0.000 kNm
### kNm

Moment @ centre of abutment cap


Moment due to bearing 1 = 2234.70 x 5.000 = 11173.509 kNm
Moment due to bearing 2 = 3120.15 x 0.000 = 0.000 kNm
Moment due to cantilever portion-Rect. = 0.00 x 6.350 = 0.000 kNm
Moment due to cantilever portion-Triangle = 0.00 x 6.350 = 0.000 kNm
Moment due to Straight portion = 0.00 x 3.175 = 0.000 kNm
Moment due to R1 or R2 = -4120.71 x 0.000 = 0.000 kNm
### kNm

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/221 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Abutment Cap -Staad
Designe
Project #REF! Vishal
d by:

Summet
Client GALFAR ENGINEERING & CONTRACTING (INDIA) PVT. LTD. Checke
Khanna
d by:
Date &
Job Name DESIGN OF ABUTMENT (A1) AND FOUNDATION FOR ROB AT CH. 211+865 17/07/201
Rev.
3 (R1)

Section in Trans direction


Distance of point of load from face of support a = -1250 mm

Overall depth of section at face of support h = 600 mm

Clear Cover c = 40 mm

Dia of main reinforcement f = 25 mm

Effective Depth of Section d' = 523.5 mm

For the section to be designed as corbel " a / d " shall be less than 1.

Hence a/d = -1250 / 523.5

= -2.39 < 1.0

As the ratio " a / d " is more than 1, so the section is to be designed as a cantilever

DESIGN OF CAP ALONG TRANSVERSE DIRECTION AS CANTILEVER

1) Summary of Load over Cantilever Portion of Cap: Normal Case

Moment (MT)
Factored
Eccentricity @ face of
Loads from superstructure Load Factor Vertical load
(m) Abutment
(kN)
(kNm)
DL 1.35 637.875 -1.25 -797.344
SIDL without W.C. 1.35 139.050 -1.25 -173.813
Wearing Coat 1.75 105.119 -1.25 -131.399
LL 1.50 546.638 -1.25 -683.297
1428.682 -1785.852

Moment
Factored
Eccentricity (MT) @ face
Vertical load
(m) of Abutment
(kN)
(kNm)

Weight of Pedestal 1.35 12.420 -1.250 -15.525


Weight of Tran. Seismic Arrestor 1.35 16.304 -0.38 -6.20

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/222 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Abutment Cap -Staad
Designe
Project #REF! Vishal
d by:

Summet
Client GALFAR ENGINEERING & CONTRACTING (INDIA) PVT. LTD. Checke
Khanna
d by:
Date &
Job Name DESIGN OF ABUTMENT (A1) AND FOUNDATION FOR ROB AT CH. 211+865 17/07/201
Rev.
3 (R1)

Weight of Long. Seismic Arrestor 1.35 31.742 -2.75 -87.29


Weight of Abutment Cap 1.35 0.000 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
60.466 #DIV/0!

Total Flexural Moment ( Mu) @ face of Abutment = #DIV/0! kNm


Total Flexural Shear (VEd,s) @ face of Abutment = 1489.15 kN

2) Summary of Load over Cantilever Portion of Cap: Seismic Case


Seismic Effect Factor = 1.50 Seismic coeff(av) = 0.080

Moment (MT)
Fact. Vertical Fv due to Eccentricity @ face of
Loads from superstructure
load (kN) seismic (kN) (m) Abutment
Load Factor (kNm)
DL 1.35 637.875 76.545 -1.25 -893.025
SIDL without W.C. 1.35 139.050 16.686 -1.25 -194.670
Wearing Coat 1.75 105.119 12.614 -1.25 -147.167
LL 0.20 38.485 4.618 -1.25 -53.879
920.529 110.463 -1288.741

Moment (MT)
Fact. Vertical Fv due to Eccentricity @ face of
load (kN) seismic (kN) (m) Abutment
(kNm)
Weight of Pedestal 1.35 12.420 1.490 -1.250 -17.388
Weight of Tran. Seismic Arrestor 1.35 16.304 1.956 -0.380 -6.939
Weight of Long. Seismic Arrestor 1.35 31.742 3.809 -2.750 -97.765
Weight of Abutment Cap 1.35 0.000 0.000 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
60.466 7.256 #DIV/0!

Total Flexural Moment ( Mu) @ face of Abutment in seismic case = #DIV/0! kNm
Total Flexural Shear (VEd,s) @ face of Abutment in seismic case = 1098.71 kN

3) Summary of Load over Cantilever Portion of Cap : Jacking Condition

Moment
Factored
Eccentricity (MT) @ face
Loads from superstructure Load Factor Vertical load
(m) of Abutment
(kN)
(kNm)

DL 1.35 1275.750 -1.25 -1594.688


SIDL without W.C. 1.35 130.950 -1.25 -163.688
Wearing Coat 1.75 240.735 -1.25 -300.919
1647.435 -2059.294

Moment
Factored
Eccentricity (MT) @ face
Vertical load
(m) of Abutment
(kN)
(kNm)

Weight of Pedestal 12.420 -1.250 -15.525


Weight of Tran. Seismic Arrestor 16.304 -0.380 -6.20
Weight of Long. Seismic Arrestor 31.742 -2.750 -87.29
Weight of Abutment Cap 0.000 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
60.466 #DIV/0!

Total Flexural Moment ( Mu) @ face of Abutment in seismic case = #DIV/0! kNm
Total Flexural Shear (VEd,s) @ face of Abutment in seismic case = 1707.90 kN

Shear due to torsional moment ( VEd,t) = tt , tef , z where tt = TEd/( 2 Ak,tef)

Ak = 0.00 m2
z = 0.00 m
tef = 0.52 m

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/223 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Abutment Cap -Staad
Designe
Project #REF! Vishal
d by:

Summet
Client GALFAR ENGINEERING & CONTRACTING (INDIA) PVT. LTD. Checke
Khanna
d by:
Date &
Job Name DESIGN OF ABUTMENT (A1) AND FOUNDATION FOR ROB AT CH. 211+865 17/07/201
Rev.
3 (R1)

Summary of ultimate moment and shear from staad analysis of Abutment Cap:

Flexural Flexural Torsional Shear due


moment Shear moment to torsional
(Mu), kNm (VEd,s), KN (Tu),kNm moment
(VEd,t).KN
Normal Case 1000.00 800.00 288.00 #DIV/0!
Seismic Case 1200.00 900.00 288.00 #DIV/0!
Jacking Condition 1500.00 1000.00 288.00 #DIV/0!
Maximum 1500.00 1000.00 288.00 #DIV/0!

Governing Flexural Moment ( Mu) @ face of Abutment (Max of 1 , 2, 3) = #DIV/0! kNm


Governing Flexural Shear (VEd,s) @ face of Abutment (Max of 1 , 2, 3) = 1707.90 kN

Torsional Moment and Shear Force

Unbalance Long. Force responsible for Torsional moment @ face of Abutment = 1647.44 kN
Eccentricity of unbalance force = 0.00 m
Torsional moment @ face of Abutment ( Tu) = 0.16 kNm
Shear due to torsional moment ( VEd,t) = 0.50 kN

Material Properties:

Grade of Concrete = M 40
fck = 40 N/mm2
fctm = 3.03 N/mm2

Grade of Steel = Fe 500 ( HYSD Bars)


fy or fyk = 500.00 N/mm2
fyd = 434.78 N/mm2 (fy/1.15)
Es = 200000.00 N/mm 2

Part-I : Calculation of Transverse Reinforcement Due to Flexure

Check For Depth of Abutment Cap :


Mult = 0.167 x fck x b x d^2 = 1500.00 kNm

Effective Depth of Cap Required (dreq) 1500.00 x 1000000


= SQRT( )
0.167 x 40 x0

Effective Depth of Cap Required (dreq) = #DIV/0! mm

Total Depth Required ( Dreq) = #DIV/0! mm


Total Depth Provided (Dprov) = 600.00 mm #DIV/0!

R= Mu/(b d^2) = #DIV/0!

Minimum Longitudinal Reinforcement in Abutment Cap :

As. Min = 0.26 x fctm x b.d - Refer Eq. 16.5.1.1 & 16.6.1.1 of IRC: 112-2011
fyk
OR = 0.0015 x b.d -Refer Clause 16.9 of IRC:112-2011'
Whichever is higher

b = 0.00 mm

d = 523.50 mm

Ast min = 0.00 mm2

Area of Steel Required:


pt = Astreq = fck { 1 - sqrt( 1- 4.598 R/fck) }
100 bd 2 fy

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/224 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Abutment Cap -Staad
Designe
Project #REF! Vishal
d by:

Summet
Client GALFAR ENGINEERING & CONTRACTING (INDIA) PVT. LTD. Checke
Khanna
d by:
Date &
Job Name DESIGN OF ABUTMENT (A1) AND FOUNDATION FOR ROB AT CH. 211+865 17/07/201
Rev.
3 (R1)

= #DIV/0!
Astreq = #DIV/0! mm2

Ast required = max( Astmin, Astreq) = #DIV/0! mm2

Part-II : Calculation of Transverse Reinforcement Due to Torsion

Transverse Reinforcement due to Torsion: As per Clause 10.5.2 , eq 10.49 of IRC:112-2011

Asl fyd TEd cot q


 uk
=
2 Ak
By rearranging the above equation

Asl = TEd cot q uk


2 Ak fyd

Where , uk = 1200 mm
Ak = 0 mm2
cot q = #DIV/0!
Torsional Moment, TEd = 288000000 Nmm

Transverse steel due to Torsion, Asl = #DIV/0! mm2

Part-I Part-II
Total Transverse Reinforcement = #DIV/0! + #DIV/0!

= #DIV/0! mm2

1st layer Provide 25 mm dia. @ 14 Nos. = 6872.23 mm2


2nd layer Provide 16 mm dia. @ 14 Nos. = 2814.87 mm2 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
= 9687.10 mm2
Area of Steel Provided little bit higher than required For Crack width Control
Spacing of Reinforcement = -8.00 mm c/c of bars

Moment of Resistance of Section corresponding to Provided Ast


Mu = 0.87 fy Ast d [1 - Ast fy / b d fck]

= #DIV/0! kNm #DIV/0! #DIV/0! kNm


#DIV/0!
Part-III : Shear Reinforcement Due to Flexure & Torsion

Ultimate Shear Force Due to Flexure , VEd,s = 1000.00 kN


Ultimate Shear Force Due to Torsion , VEd,t = #DIV/0! kN

Design Shear Strength of Concrete,(t c) without Shear Reinforcement:

As per Clause 10.3.2 of IRC:112-2011,


Design shear resistance of the member without shear reinforcement is given by:


VRd,c = 0.12 K ( 80r1 f ck )
0.33

+ 0.15s cp bw d eq.1

Subjected to minimum of V Rd , c = (V min + 0.15 s cp ) b w d eq.2

where,
K= 1 + SQRT(200/d) ≤ 2.0 , where d is depth in mm
K= 1.62
vmin= 0.031 K3/2 fck1/2 , fck = 40.00 N/mm2

Hence vmin= 0.4036 N/mm2

scp = Concrete compressive stress in concrete at centroidal axis in the direction of axial load or prestressing
scp = NEd/Ac < 0.2 fcd where , fcd = 0.67 fck/1.5
scp = 0.00 N/mm2 for RCC Abutment Cap

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/225 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Abutment Cap -Staad
Designe
Project #REF! Vishal
d by:

Summet
Client GALFAR ENGINEERING & CONTRACTING (INDIA) PVT. LTD. Checke
Khanna
d by:
Date &
Job Name DESIGN OF ABUTMENT (A1) AND FOUNDATION FOR ROB AT CH. 211+865 17/07/201
Rev.
3 (R1)

Hence,

tc = VRd,c/(bw.d) = Vmin + 0.15 scp = 0.4036 N/mm2 From eq.1

r1 = Steel Ratio = Asl/(bw . d) ≤ 0.02


Hence r1 = #DIV/0!

tc = VRd,c/(bw.d) = #DIV/0! N/mm2 From eq.2

Max of eq.1 & eq.2

tc = VRd,c/(bw.d) = #DIV/0! N/mm2 #DIV/0!

Shear stress( Tv) = Ved/(bw*z) = VEd/(b*0.9d) , Where VEd = Normal Shear Force at Abutment Face

Tv = 1000.00 x 1000 = #DIV/0! N/mm2 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!


0.00 x 471.15

#DIV/0!

CALCULATION OF SHEAR REINFORCEMENT:

Balance Shear Force Due to Flexure (VRd,s) = (Tv-Tc) * b * d = #DIV/0! N

Shear Force Due to Torsion(VRd,t) = #DIV/0! N

Total Shear Force VRd = VRd,s + VRd,t = #DIV/0! N

As per Clause 10.3.3.2 of IRC:112-2011

VRd = Asw * z fywd * cotq


s
Where,
q= 0.5 x sin^-1 [ ved / ( 0.18 fck ( 1- fck/250))]
= #DIV/0!
cot q = #DIV/0! < 1 cotq <2.5
Provide cot q = #DIV/0!
Asw= c/s area of shear reinforcement in mm2
z= lever arm = 0.9 * d = 471.15 mm For R.C. Section
fywd= 0.8 fywk = &0.8*500/1.15 = 347.826 N/mm2

Provide 2 leg stirrups of 16 mm dia bar


Provide 2 leg stirrups of 12 mm dia bar

Asw = 628.32 mm2

Spacing of stirrups required ( s) = #DIV/0! mm

Minimum Shear Reinforcement Ratio: As per Clause 10.3.3.5 of IRC:112-2011


Asw = 0.072 * sqrt ( fck) = 0.0009107
b*s fyk

Henc Maximum Spacing (s) = #DIV/0! mm

Check Maximum Spacing of Shear Reinforcement: As per Clause 16.5.2 , eq. 16.6 of IRC:112-2011

smax = 0.75 d = 392.63 mm

Governing Spacing of Shear Reinforcement = #DIV/0! mm

Hence Provide the Spacing of Shear Reinforcement = 150 mm

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/226 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Abutment Cap -Staad
Designe
Project #REF! Vishal
d by:

Summet
Client GALFAR ENGINEERING & CONTRACTING (INDIA) PVT. LTD. Checke
Khanna
d by:
Date &
Job Name DESIGN OF ABUTMENT (A1) AND FOUNDATION FOR ROB AT CH. 211+865 17/07/201
Rev.
3 (R1)

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/227 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Design of Rectangular Wall (2)

Design of Wall:
Material Property:
Grade of Concrete = M 40
fck = 40 N/mm2
fcd = 17.867 N/mm2
Grade of steel = Fe 500
fy = 500 N/mm2
fyd = 434.783 N/mm2
Es = 200000.00 N/mm2

Cross section of Wall:


Thickness of Wall (B) = 1.200 m
Depth of Wall (D) = 12.500 m
Area of Concrete (Ac) = 15.000 m2

Clear Cover to earth faces = 75 mm


Clear Cover to non earth faces = 50 mm
Maximum Dia of Vertical Reinf. = 32 mm
Dia of Horizontal Reinf. = 20 mm

As per Clause 7.6.4.1 of IRC:112-2011


Ultimate axial force (Pu) = 19924.89 kN

0.1 fcd Ac = 0.1 x 17.87 x 15000000


= 26800000 N
= 26800.00 kN

Since Axial Force is less than axial capacity of section , Section will design as
bending element . Neglecting axial force

PART 1: LONGITUDINAL MOMENT : VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT ON EARTH


FACE
Ultimate Design bending moment (ML) = 22357.56 kNm =

Check For Depth of Wall :


Mult = 0.165 x fck x b x d^2
= 1788.60 kNm/m

b = 1000.00 mm

Effective Depth Required (dreq) 1788.60 x 1000000


= SQRT( )
0.165 x 40.00 x 1000

(dreq) = 520.577 mm

Total Depth Required ( Dreq) = 631.58 mm


Total Depth Provided (Dprov) = 1200.00 mm OK
Effective depth provided(deff) = 1089 mm

R= Mu/(b d^2) = 1.51

Minimum Longitudinal Reinforcement in wall on each face


= 0.0012 x bxD
Ast min = 1440.00 mm2/m

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/228 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Design of Rectangular Wall (2)

Area of Steel Required:


pt = Astreq = fck { 1 - sqrt( 1- 4.598 R/fck) }
100 bD 2 fy
= 0.0036
Astreq = 4358.720 mm2/m

Ast required = max( Astmin, Astreq) = 4358.72 mm2/m


Total are of steel required in full length = 54484.00 mm2

Provide 32 mm dia @ 110.00 mm c/c =


14622.69
Provide 32 mm dia @ 110.00 mm c/c =

Effective length of shaft = 12254 mm


Calculation of reinforcement in numbers
Provide 32 mm dia - 111.00 nos =
179347.24
Provide 32 mm dia - 112.00 nos =

Percentage of steel = 1.196 %

Check for Moment of Resistance of Section due to Steel


Limiting Depth of Neutral Axis , Xm = 0.0035 . d
( 0.0035 + fyd/ Es)

= 0.0035 x 1089.00
0.0035 + 0.0022

= 671.76 mm
Depth of Neutral Axis , X = fyd . Ast
0.36 . fck . b

= 434.78 x 14622.69
0.36 x 40.00 x 1000.00

= 441.51 mm OK

Lever Arm ( z ) between Compressive Force ( C) and Tensile Force ( T)

z = d - 0.416 . X
= 1089.00 - 183.67
= 905.33 mm

Moment of Resistance of Section w.r.t. Steel ( MR)

MR = fyd . Ast . z

= 434.78 x 14622.69 x 905.33

= 5.76E+09 Nmm /m

= 5755.83 kNm/m > 1788.60 kNm/m

Moment of Resistance of Wall is More than Design Bending Moment , HENCE Wall IS SAFE IN
BENDING

LONGITUDINAL REINFORCEMENT ON NON EARTH FACE


Minimum Longitudinal Reinforcement in wall on each face

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/229 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Design of Rectangular Wall (2)

= 0.0012 x bxD
Ast min = 1440.00 mm2/m
= 18000.00 mm2

Provide 25 mm dia @ 110.00 mm c/c = 4462.49

Calculation of reinforcement in numbers


Provide 25 mm dia @ 111.00 nos = 54487.00

PART 3 : HORIZONTAL REINFORCEMENT CALCULATION

Horizontal Reinforcement for wall


maximum of following = 0.2500 x 19085.18 = 4771.294
= 0.001 x 1.20E+06 = 1200.000
Maximum Horizontal Reinf. 4771 mm2 per meter

Min dia of bar = 0.250 x 32 = 8


or 8 mm

Maximum Spacing between <= 300 mm c/c

2 Legged 20 dia @ 100 c/c = 6283.185

Confinement Reinforcement

As per Clause 17.2.1.3 (Note 2)of IRC:112-2011


Distance between links or ties (ST) = 1/3 x 1035 =
or 200.00 mm

Governing Spacing = 200.00 mm

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/230 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Design of Rectangular Wall (2)
As per Clause 17.2.1.3 (Note 1)of IRC:112-2011
The Spacing of hoops and ties in the longitudinal direction (SL)
SL = 5 x 32 =
or 1/5 x 1035 =
Min = 100 mm

2 Legged 20 dia @ 100 c/c = 6283.185


38 Legged 10 dia @ 100 c/c = 29845.130
54 links 10 dia @ 100 c/c = 42411.501
78539.816

Minimum Confinement Reinforrcement:

nk = NED = 19924888.1 = 0.0332


Ak fck 600000000
AC = 15.000 mm2
ACC = 1.075 x 12.400 = 13.330 mm2
rL = 0.01199 per meter
rL = 0.14992
fyd = 434.783
fcd = 17.867

AC f yd
wwd.req = 0.37  k + 0.13 ( r L - 0.01)
ACC f cd

ωwd.req = 0.4565
wwd = max ( wwd,req , 0.12) = 0.4565

As per Clause 17.2.1.1 (4) of IRC:112-2011

Confined Reinforcement = w wd = r w f yd / f cd where ,

Volumetric ratio,
Asw = 78539.82 mm2
SL = 100.000 mm
b = 1035.000 mm
rw = 0.759
wwd.c = 18.466

wwd,c ≥ wwd as per equation 17.7 of IRC:112-2011

w wd,c = 18.47 OK

Length of Potential Plastic Hinges Refer clause 17.2.1.4 of IRC:112-2011

nk = NED = 0.0332 < 0.24


Ak fck

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/231 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Design of Rectangular Wall (2)

1788.60 kNm/m

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/232 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Design of Rectangular Wall (2)

mm2/m OK

mm2 OK

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/233 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Design of Rectangular Wall (2)

mm2/m OK

mm2 OK

As per IRC: 112-2011 , Clause


16.3.2

mm

mm2 OK

345

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/234 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Design of Rectangular Wall (2)

160 mm
207 mm

mm2 OK
mm2
mm2
mm2

as per equation 17.7 of IRC:112-2011

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/235 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT SLS CHECK OF SHAFT-Rectangular

CALCULATION OF SLS FORCES FOR DESIGN ABUTMENT SHA


Abutment shaft bottom lvl = 738.135 m

Case 1 : DL+SIDL-Normal Dry Case

Vertical
load factor MT
Load( P ) kN.
SELF WEIGHT 1 4806.104 0
CRASH BARRIER 1 286.162 0
SIDL WEARING COAT 1 825.74 0
PASSIVE EARTH PRESSURE 1 200.058 0
Total 6118.064 0

Summary of Forces at Bottom of abutment shaft


P 6118.064 KN
ML 35248.740 kNm
MT 0.000 kNm

Case 2 : DL+SIDL+LL-(Maximum Reaction Case)-Normal Dry Case

Vertical
load factor MT
Load( P ) kN.
SELF WEIGHT 1 4806.104 0
CRASH BARRIER 1 286.162 0
SIDL WEARING COAT 1 825.74 0
PASSIVE EARTH PRESSURE 1 200.058 0
LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE 1 168.466 0
LIVE LOAD 1 2030.537 -148.274
BRAKING FORCE 1 34.384 0
Total 8351.451 -148.274

Summary of Forces at Bottom of abutment shaft


P 8351.451 KN
ML 46142.735 kNm
MT 148.274 kNm

Case 3 : DL+SIDL-Normal HFL Case

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/236 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT SLS CHECK OF SHAFT-Rectangular

Vertical
load factor MT
Load( P ) kN.
SELF WEIGHT 1.35 4806.104 0
CRASH BARRIER 1.35 286.162 0
SIDL WEARING COAT 1.75 825.74 0
PASSIVE EARTH PRESSURE HFL 1.5 199.37 0
Total 8618.6591 0

Summary of Forces at Bottom of abutment shaft


P 8618.659 KN
ML 49607.768 kNm
MT 0.000 kNm

Case 4 : DL+SIDL+LL- (Minimum Reaction Case)-Normal HFL Case

Vertical
load factor MT
Load( P ) kN.
SELF WEIGHT 1.35 4806.104 0
CRASH BARRIER 1.35 286.162 0
SIDL WEARING COAT 1.75 825.74 0
PASSIVE EARTH PRESSURE HFL 1.5 199.37 0
LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE 1.2 168.466 0
LIVE LOAD 0 2030.537 -148.274
BRAKING FORCE 1.5 34.384 0
Total 8872.3943 0

Summary of Forces at Bottom of abutment shaft


P 8872.394 KN
ML 47413.334 kNm
MT 0.000 kNm

Centrifugal Force : Normal Case


Centrifugal Force (C.F.) = 1.00 x
Transverse Moment due to C.F. = 0.000 x (

Summary of SLS Forces for Design of Abutment Shaft

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/237 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT SLS CHECK OF SHAFT-Rectangular

Total forces at botto


LOAD CASES
shaft

Normal Dry Case P


kN

Case 1 : DL+SIDL-Normal Dry Case 6118.06

Case 2 : DL+SIDL+LL-(Maximum Reaction Case)-Normal Dry


8351.45
Case
Normal HFLCase

Case 3 : DL+SIDL-Normal HFL Case 8618.66

Case 4 : DL+SIDL+LL- (Minimum Reaction Case)-Normal HFL


8872.39
Case

IN RARE COMBINATION
Max SLS Moment =

Max Moment per meter =

IN QUASI-PERMANENT

Max SLS Moment =

Max Moment per meter =

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/238 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT SLS CHECK OF SHAFT-Rectangular

Check For Stresses in Rare and Quasi-Permanent Load Combination

Creep Coeff = 1.2

Rare Combination
Short term
Working bending moment, M = 3968.62
Dx (unit width of shaft) = 1.00
Dy (Thickness of shaft) = 1.50
Section Modulus (ZL) of uncracke= 0.38
Bending Stress ( M/ZL) = 10.583
Tensile stress of concrete , fctm = 3.029
Cracked or Uncracked Section = Cracked
Section properties of Cracked section:
Note: Stresses under Service load are usually within Linear Elastic Range hence such a

Es = 200000.00
Ecm = 33345.76
Eceff = 33345.76
Modular Ratio (m) = 6.00
Clear Cover, c = 50.000
Maximum dia used, f = 32.000
Effective Depth deff (dy) = 1389.000
Ast provided = 14622.686
Percentage of steel , pt = 0.0096
k=sqrt{ 2 pt *m + (pt*m)^2 } - pt* m 0.286
Depth of neutral axis from extreme
= 397.513
Compression face ( yc = k * dy)
Depth of neutral axis from extreme
= 991.487
tension face ( yt = dy-yc)
Depth of neutral axis from c.g. Of
= 925.487
tension steel ( ys)
Cracked moment of Inertia (Icr) = Dx *(k * dy)^3/3
Icr = 1.072E+11
Maximum compressive stress in
= 14.722
concrete
Maximum Tensile stress in steel = 205.584

Check For Crack Width in Quasi-Permanent Case

Crack width , Wk = Sr max (εsm - εcm)


NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/239 Minor Bridge at 116+490
Design Calculation ICT SLS CHECK OF SHAFT-Rectangular

Above Formula For Calculation of Sr max is applicable if the spacing between the reinf.
less or equal to 5*(c+φ/2)
5*(c+φ/2) = 330.000
Provided Spacing = 110.000
Check for Applicability of Formula = OK
Maximum crack spacing , Sr max = 3.4 c +

K1 = 0.800
K2 = 0.500
depth of neutral axis , yc = 544.235

r r eff = As/Ac eff , where Ac,eff =effective area of


=
concrete in tension surrounding the re
hc eff = Min of 2.5 (Dy - dy ) ,Dy
= 277.500
- yc/3 , Dy/2
Ac, eff = Dx * hc,eff = 277500.000
r r eff = As/Ac eff = 0.053
Maximum crack spacing , Sr max = 273.237
σsc - kt fct eff (1 + αe r r ef )
(εsm - εcm) = r r eff
tensile stress in steel, ,σsc = 213.039
Kt = 0.500
Tensile strength of concrete = fct eff
= 3.029
= fctm
αe = Es/Ecm = 13.195
(εsm - εcm) = 0.00082
Crack width , Wk=Sr max (εsm - ε = 0.224
Check = < 0.3 ,SAFE

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/240 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT SLS CHECK OF SHAFT-Rectangular

GN ABUTMENT SHAFT

ML

-26753.22
-1745.46
-4095.68
-2654.38
-35248.74

Normal Dry Case

ML

-26753.22
-1745.46
-4095.68
-2654.38
2214.32
-12799.815
-308.5
-46142.735

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/241 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT SLS CHECK OF SHAFT-Rectangular

ML

-26753.22
-1745.46
-4095.68
-2644.74
-49607.768

Normal HFL Case

ML

-26753.22
-1745.46
-4095.68
-2644.74
2214.32
-12799.815
-308.5
-47413.334

0.00 = 0.000 KN
754.700 - 738.135 ) = 0.000 kNm

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/242 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT SLS CHECK OF SHAFT-Rectangular

Total forces at bottom of abutment


shaft
ML MT
kNm kNm

35248.740 0.000

46142.735 148.274

49607.768 0.000

47413.334 0.000

49607.768 kNm

3968.621 kNm/m

49607.768 kNm

3968.621 kNm/m

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/243 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT SLS CHECK OF SHAFT-Rectangular

oad Combination

Rare Combination Quasi


Long Term permanent
3968.62 3968.62 kNm/m
1.00 1.00 m
1.50 1.50 m
0.38 0.38 m3
10.583 10.583 N/mm2
3.029 3.029 N/mm2
Cracked Cracked

Elastic Range hence such analysis involved use of Modulus ratio.

200000.00 200000.00 N/mm2


33345.76 33345.76 N/mm2
15157.17 15157.17 N/mm2
13.20 13.20
50.000 50.00 mm
32.000 32.00 mm
1389.000 1389.00 mm
14622.686 14622.69 mm2/m
0.0096 0.0096
0.392 0.392
544.235 544.235 mm

844.765 844.765 mm

778.765 778.765 mm
Dx *(k * dy)^3/3 + m Ast * (dy - k * dy)^2
1.914E+11 1.914E+11 mm4
11.283 11.283 < 19.2, SAFE

213.039 213.039 < 300, SAFE

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/244 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT SLS CHECK OF SHAFT-Rectangular

spacing between the reinf. is

mm
mm

0.425 k1 k2 φ
r r ef
for deformed bars
for bending
mm
re Ac,eff =effective area of
n tension surrounding the reinf.

mm
mm

mm
/ Es

N/mm2

N/mm2

mm

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/245 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Design of Abut. Shaft-ANX IV
Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509

Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509

Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509

Summary of ULS Forces for Design of Abutment Shaft Using OASIS

Err:509 Err:509 Err:509


LOAD CASES
Err:509 Err:509 Err:509

Normal Dry Case Err:509 Err:509 Err:509

Longitudinal Seismic Dry Case Err:509 Err:509 Err:509

Transverse Seismic Dry Case Err:509 Err:509 Err:509

Summary of SLS Forces for Design of Abutment Shaft Using OASIS

LOAD CASES P (kN) ML (kNm) MT (kNm)

NORMAL Err:509 Err:509 Err:509

Design Input:
Diameter of Abutment, D = 1.50 m
Area of concrete , Ac = 1.77 m2
Length of Abutment = 10.48 m

Material Properties:
Concrete Grade = M35 fy = 500.00 N/mm2
Steel Grade = Fe500 D fyd = 434.78 N/mm2
fck = 35.00 N/mm2 Ecm = 32308.25 N/mm2
fcd=0.446fck = 15.61 N/mm2 Es = 200000 N/mm2

Clear Cover = 50 mm

Longitudinal Reinforcement: ( Refer clause 16.2.2 of IRC: 112-2011)

Asmin = 0.10 NED or 0.002 Ac whicever is greater


fyd

NED = Err:509 KN
Asmin = Err:509 mm2

Sectional Reinforcement: REFER ANNEXURE - I FOR SLS & ULS DESIGN OF ABUTMENT SHAFT USING OASIS

32 dia - 40 Nos = 32169.909 mm2

Total Ast Provided = 32169.909 mm2


Area of concrete Ac = 1767146 mm2
Percentage of Steel Pt = 1.820 %
Spacing between Bar = 105.55751 mm

Summary of OASIS Result :

Maximum stress in reinforcement in ULS = 323 N/mm2


Maximum stress in reinforcement in SLS = 186.7 N/mm2
Crack width = 0.286 mm

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/246 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Design of Abut. Shaft-ANX IV
Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509

Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509

Err:509 Err:509 Err:509 Err:509

Transverse Reinforcement
As per Clause 16.2.3 of IRC 112:2011
Minimum Diameter of Tie bars = 0.250 x 32 = 8 mm
or 8.000 mm whichever is greater

Pitch of the Lateral Ties shall not be exceed than = 12.000 x 32 = 384 mm
or = 1500 mm
or = 200.000 mm whichever is less
Governing pitch of lateral ties = 200.000 mm

Confinement Reinforcement in Circular Shaft

As per Clause 17.2.1.3 of IRC:112-2011


Spacing of Hoops :
SL ≤ 5x 32.000 = 160 mm
SL ≤ 1/5 x 1344.000 = 268.8 mm

Adopt Spacing of Hoops = 90 mm OK


Dia of Hoops adopted , Dsp = 20 mm
As per Clause 17.2.1.1 (4) of IRC:112-2011
4 Asp
Confined Reinforcemen= w wd = r w f yd / f cd where , rw =
Dsp S L
Volumetric ratio, rw = 0.007
wwd.c = 0.194

Provide 20 mm dia at Spacing 90.000 mm c/c as Hoop Reinf.

nk = NED = Err:509 = Err:509


Ak fck 6.19E+07

AC = 1767146 mm2
ACC = 0.7853982 x 1344.000 x 1344.000 = 1418693 mm2
rL = 0.0182044

AC f yd
wwd.req = 0.37  k + 0.13 ( r L - 0.01)
ACC f cd

ωwd.req = Err:509
wwd.min = 0.18
max ( 1.4 wwd,req , 0.18 ) = Err:509
as per equation 17.7 of IRC:112-2011 wwd,c ≥ max ( 1.4 wwd,req , 0.18 )

w wd,c = 0.194 Err:509

Length of Potential Plastic Hinges Refer clause 17.2.1.4 of IRC:112-2011

nk = NED = Err:509 Err:509 0.30


Ak fck

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/247 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Abutment Cap -column type abut
Project Err:509 Err:509 Err:509

Client Err:509 Err:509 Err:509

Job Name Err:509 Err:509 Err:509

DESIGN OF ABUTMENT CAP


Width of Abutment cap of Uniform portion = 0.000 m
Width of Abutmentcap at bottom of Tapering P = 0.000 m
Length of Abutment cap (Trans direction) = 12.500 m
Width/Diameter of Abutment (Long Direction) = 1.500 m
Length of Abutment Uniform Portion = 12.500 m
Equivalent Size of Abutment = 1.33 m
Thickness of Uniform Portion of Cap = 0.30 m
Thickness of Tapering Portion of Cap = 0.30 m

Long. Eccentricity of Bearings@ C/L of


= 0.000 m
Support
c/c Distance between bearing (Trans) = 5.00 m
No of Bearing for one span = 0.00 Nos.

Volumnn of Cantilever portion of cap = 0.00 m3


C.g. of Cap from face of Abutment = #DIV/0! m
Density of concrete = 25.00 kN/m3
C.g. of Pedestal from face of Abutment = 4.34 m
C.g. of Long. Arrestor from face of Abutment s = 0.00 m
C.g. of Trans. Arrestor from face of Abutment = 0.00 m
Centre distance of jack from face of Abutment = 2.17 m

Transverse Direction
1250 5000 5000 1250

Direction of Traffic
Longitudinal
Direction

1329

Movement
L1 1329 L2 L3 0

5585
12500

Section in Trans direction


Distance of point of load from face of support a = 4335 mm

Overall depth of section at face of support h = 600 mm

Clear Cover c = 40 mm

Dia of main reinforcement f = 32 mm

Effective Depth of Section d' = 515.5 mm

For the section to be designed as corbel " a / d " shall be less than 1.

Hence a/d = 4335.33 / 515.5

= 8.41 >1.0

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/248 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Abutment Cap -column type abut
Project Err:509 Err:509 Err:509

Client Err:509 Err:509 Err:509

Job Name Err:509 Err:509 Err:509

As the ratio " a / d " is more than 1, so the section is to be designed as a cantilever

DESIGN OF CAP ALONG TRANSVERSE DIRECTION AS CANTILEVER

1) Summary of Load over Cantilever Portion of Cap: Normal Case

Moment (MT)
Factored
Eccentricity @ face of
Loads from superstructure Load Factor Vertical load
(m) Abutment
(kN)
(kNm)
DL 1.35 1521.350 4.335 6595.554
SIDL without W.C. 1.35 152.580 4.335 661.483
Wearing Coat 1.75 504.662 4.335 2187.874
LL 1.50 58.855 4.335 255.156
2237.446 9700.068

Moment
Factored
Eccentricity (MT) @ face
Vertical load
(m) of Abutment
(kN)
(kNm)

Weight of Pedestal 1.35 0.000 4.335 0.000


Weight of Tran. Seismic Arrestor 1.35 0.000 0.00 0.00
Weight of Long. Seismic Arrestor 1.35 0.000 0.00 0.00
Weight of Abutment Cap 1.35 0.000 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0.000 #DIV/0!

Total Flexural Moment ( Mu) @ face of Abutment = #DIV/0! kNm


Total Flexural Shear (VEd,s) @ face of Abutment = 2237.45 kN

2) Summary of Load over Cantilever Portion of Cap: Seismic Case


Seismic Effect Factor = 1.50 Seismic coeff(av) = 0.252

Moment (MT)
Fact. Vertical Fv due to Eccentricity @ face of
Loads from superstructure
load (kN) seismic (kN) (m) Abutment
Load Factor (kNm)
DL 1.35 1521.350 574.105 4.335 9084.487
SIDL without W.C. 1.35 152.580 57.578 4.335 911.104
Wearing Coat 1.75 504.662 190.442 4.335 3013.501
LL 0.20 7.847 2.961 4.335 46.859
2186.439 825.086 13055.951

Moment (MT)
Fact. Vertical Fv due to Eccentricity @ face of
load (kN) seismic (kN) (m) Abutment
(kNm)
Weight of Pedestal 1.35 0.000 0.000 4.335 0.000
Weight of Tran. Seismic Arrestor 1.35 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Weight of Long. Seismic Arrestor 1.35 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Weight of Abutment Cap 1.35 0.000 0.000 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0.000 0.000 #DIV/0!

Total Flexural Moment ( Mu) @ face of Abutment in seismic case = #DIV/0! kNm
Total Flexural Shear (VEd,s) @ face of Abutment in seismic case = 3011.52 kN

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/249 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Abutment Cap -column type abut
Project Err:509 Err:509 Err:509

Client Err:509 Err:509 Err:509

Job Name Err:509 Err:509 Err:509

3) Summary of Load over Cantilever Portion of Cap : Jacking Condition

Nos. Of Jacks under each cross girder = 2

Moment
Factored
Eccentricity (MT) @ face
Loads from superstructure Load Factor Vertical load
(m) of Abutment
(kN)
(kNm)

DL 1.35 3244.417 2.168 7032.809


SIDL without W.C. 1.35 144.903 2.168 314.101
Wearing Coat 1.75 730.076 2.168 1582.559
4119.396 8929.469

Moment
Factored
Eccentricity (MT) @ face
Vertical load
(m) of Abutment
(kN)
(kNm)

Weight of Pedestal 0.000 4.335 0.000


Weight of Tran. Seismic Arrestor 0.000 0.000 0.00
Weight of Long. Seismic Arrestor 0.000 0.000 0.00
Weight of Abutment Cap 0.000 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0.000 #DIV/0!

Total Flexural Moment ( Mu) @ face of Abutment in seismic case = #DIV/0! kNm
Total Flexural Shear (VEd,s) @ face of Abutment in seismic case = 4119.40 kN

Governing Flexural Moment ( Mu) @ face of Abutment (Max of 1 , 2, 3) = #DIV/0! kNm


Governing Flexural Shear (VEd,s) @ face of Abutment (Max of 1 , 2, 3) = 4119.40 kN

Torsional Moment and Shear Force

Unbalance Long. Force responsible for Torsional moment @ face of Abutment = 4119.40 kN
Eccentricity of unbalance force = 0.000 m
Torsional moment @ face of Abutment ( Tu) = 0.41 kNm
Shear due to torsional moment ( V Ed,t) = tt , tef , z where tt = TEd/( 2 Ak,tef)

Ak = 0.00 m2
z = 0.00 m
tef = 0.52 m

( VEd,t) = #DIV/0! kN
Material Properties:

Grade of Concrete = M 40
fck = 40 N/mm2
fctm = 3.03 N/mm2
Grade of Steel = Fe 500 ( HYSD Bars)
fy or fyk = 500.00 N/mm2
fyd = 434.78 N/mm2 (fy/1.15)
Es = 200000.00 N/mm 2

Part-I : Calculation of Transverse Reinforcement Due to Flexure

Check For Depth of Abutment Cap :


Mult = 0.165 x fck x b x d^2 = #DIV/0! kNm

Effective Depth of Cap Required (dreq) #DIV/0! x 1000000


= SQRT( )
0.165 x 40 x0

Effective Depth of Cap Required (dreq) = #DIV/0! mm

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/250 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Abutment Cap -column type abut
Project Err:509 Err:509 Err:509

Client Err:509 Err:509 Err:509

Job Name Err:509 Err:509 Err:509

Total Depth Required ( Dreq) = #DIV/0! mm


Total Depth Provided (Dprov) = 600.00 mm #DIV/0!

R= Mu/(b d^2) = #DIV/0!

Minimum Longitudinal Reinforcement in Abutment Cap :

As. Min = 0.26 x fctm x b.d - Refer Eq. 16.5.1.1 & 16.6.1.1 of IRC: 112-2011
fyk
OR = 0.0015 x b.d -Refer Clause 16.9 of IRC:112-2011'
Whichever is higher

b = 0.00 mm

d = 515.50 mm

Ast min = 0.00 mm2

Area of Steel Required:


pt = Astreq = fck { 1 - sqrt( 1- 4.598 R/fck) }
100 bd 2 fy
= #DIV/0!
Astreq = #DIV/0! mm2

Ast required = max( Astmin, Astreq) = #DIV/0! mm2

Part-II : Calculation of Transverse Reinforcement Due to Torsion

Transverse Reinforcement due to Torsion: As per Clause 10.5.2 , eq 10.49 of IRC:112-2011

Asl fyd TEd cot q


 uk
=
2 Ak
By rearranging the above equation

Asl = TEd cot q uk


2 Ak fyd

Where , uk = 1200 mm
Ak = 0 mm2
cot q = #DIV/0!
Torsional Moment, TEd = 411939.57 Nmm

Transverse steel due to Torsion, Asl = #DIV/0! mm2

Part-I Part-II
Total Transverse Reinforcement = #DIV/0! + #DIV/0!

= #DIV/0! mm2

1st layer Provide 32 mm dia. @ 15 Nos. = 12063.72 mm2


2nd layer Provide 25 mm dia. @ 15 Nos. = 7363.11 mm2 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
= 19426.82 mm2
Area of Steel Provided little bit higher than required For Crack width Control
Spacing of Reinforcement = -7.47 mm c/c of bars

Moment of Resistance of Section corresponding to Provided Ast


Mu = 0.87 fy Ast d [1 - Ast fy / b d fck]

= #DIV/0! kNm #DIV/0! #DIV/0! kNm


#DIV/0!
Part-III : Shear Reinforcement Due to Flexure & Torsion

Ultimate Shear Force Due to Flexure , V Ed,s = 4119.40 kN


Ultimate Shear Force Due to Torsion , VEd,t = #DIV/0! kN

Design Shear Strength of Concrete,(t c) without Shear Reinforcement:

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/251 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Abutment Cap -column type abut
Project Err:509 Err:509 Err:509

Client Err:509 Err:509 Err:509

Job Name Err:509 Err:509 Err:509

As per Clause 10.3.2 of IRC:112-2011,


Design shear resistance of the member without shear reinforcement is given by:


VRd,c = 0.12 K ( 80r1 f ck )
0.33

+ 0.15s cp bw d eq.1

Subjected to minimum of V Rd ,c = (V min + 0.15 s cp ) b w d eq.2

where,
K= 1 + SQRT(200/d) ≤ 2.0 , where d is depth in mm
K= 1.62
vmin= 0.031 K3/2 fck1/2 , fck = 40.00 N/mm2

Hence vmin= 0.4053 N/mm2

scp = Concrete compressive stress in concrete at centroidal axis in the direction of axial load or prestressing
scp = NEd/Ac < 0.2 fcd where , fcd = 0.67 fck/1.5
scp = 0.00 N/mm2 for RCC Abutment Cap
Hence,

tc = VRd,c/(bw.d) = Vmin + 0.15 scp = 0.4053 N/mm2 From eq.1

r1 = Steel Ratio = Asl/(bw . d) ≤ 0.02


Hence r1 = #DIV/0!

tc = VRd,c/(bw.d) = #DIV/0! N/mm2 From eq.2

Max of eq.1 & eq.2

tc = VRd,c/(bw.d) = #DIV/0! N/mm2 #DIV/0!

Shear stress( Tv) = Ved/(bw*z) = VEd/(b*0.9d) , Where VEd = Normal Shear Force at Abutment Face

Tv = 4119.40 x 1000 = #DIV/0! N/mm2 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!


0.00 x 463.95

#DIV/0!

CALCULATION OF SHEAR REINFORCEMENT:

Balance Shear Force Due to Flexure (VRd,s) = (Tv-Tc) * b * d = #DIV/0! N

Shear Force Due to Torsion(VRd,t) = #DIV/0! N

Total Shear Force VRd = VRd,s + VRd,t = #DIV/0! N

As per Clause 10.3.3.2 of IRC:112-2011

VRd = Asw * z fywd * cotq


s
Where,
q= 0.5 x sin^-1 [ ved / ( 0.18 fck ( 1- fck/250))]
= #DIV/0!
cot q = #DIV/0! < 1 cotq <2.5
Provide cot q = #DIV/0!
Asw= c/s area of shear reinforcement in mm2
z= lever arm = 0.9 * d = 463.95 mm For R.C. Section
fywd= 0.8 fywk = &0.8*500/1.15 = 347.826 N/mm2

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/252 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Abutment Cap -column type abut
Project Err:509 Err:509 Err:509

Client Err:509 Err:509 Err:509

Job Name Err:509 Err:509 Err:509

Provide 2 leg stirrups of 16 mm dia bar


Provide 2 leg stirrups of 12 mm dia bar

Asw = 628.32 mm2

Spacing of stirrups required ( s) = #DIV/0! mm

Minimum Shear Reinforcement Ratio: As per Clause 10.3.3.5 of IRC:112-2011


Asw = 0.072 * sqrt ( fck) = 0.00091
b*s fyk

Henc Maximum Spacing (s) = #DIV/0! mm

Check Maximum Spacing of Shear Reinforcement: As per Clause 16.5.2 , eq. 16.6 of IRC:112-2011

smax = 0.75 d = 386.63 mm

Governing Spacing of Shear Reinforcement = #DIV/0! mm

Hence Provide the Spacing of Shear Reinforcement = 150 mm

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/253 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT SLS - Abut. Cap
DESIGN CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR 4-LANING OF KASHIPUR- Designed
Project Vishal
SITARGANJ SECTION OF NH-74 by:

Checked Summet
Client GALFAR ENGINEERING & CONTRACTING (INDIA) PVT. LTD.
by: Khanna
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT (A1) AND FOUNDATION FOR ROB AT CH. Date & 17/07/2013
Job Name
211+865 Rev. (R1)

Stress Check of Abutment Cap


Summary of Load over Cantilever Portion of Cap: Rare Combination

1) Summary of Load over Cantilever Portion of Cap: Normal Case

Moment (MT)
Factored
@ face of
Loads from superstructLoad Facto Vertical Eccentricity (m)
Abutment
load (kN)
(kNm)
DL 1.00 1126.926 4.34 4885.596
SIDL without W.C. 1.00 113.022 4.34 489.988
Wearing Coat 1.00 288.378 4.34 1250.214
LL 1.00 39.237 4.34 170.104
1567.563 6795.901

Moment (MT)
Factored
@ face of
Vertical load Eccentricity (m)
Abutment
(kN)
(kNm)
Weight of Pedestal 1.00 0.000 4.335 0.000
Weight of Tran. Seismic Arrestor 1.00 0.000 0.000 0.00
Weight of Long. Seismic Arrestor 1.00 0.000 0.000 0.00
Weight of Abutment Cap 1.00 0.000 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0.000 #DIV/0!

Total Flexural Moment ( Mu) = #DIV/0! kNm

Torsional Moment and Shear Force

Unbalance Long. Force responsible for Torsional moment @ face of = 1567.56 kN


Eccentricity of unbalance force = 0.00 m
Torsional moment @ face of Abutment ( Tu) = 0.16 kNm

Flexural Torsional
Total Moment = + = #DIV/0! kNm
Moment Moment

Summary of Serviceable moment from staad analysis of Abutment Cap:

Flexural Torsional
moment moment
(Mu), kNm (Tu),kNm

Normal Case 1000.00 288.00


Seismic Case 1200.00 288.00
Jacking Condition 1500.00 288.00
Maximum 1500.00 288.00

Maximum compressive stress in concrete under rare combination = 19.2 N/mm2

Maximum tensile stress in steel under rare combination = 300 N/mm2

y
Section Properties of Uncracked Section:

Dy
x x
Dx
y
NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/254 Minor Bridge at 116+490
Design Calculation ICT SLS - Abut. Cap
DESIGN CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR 4-LANING OF KASHIPUR- Designed
Project Vishal
SITARGANJ SECTION OF NH-74 by:

Checked Summet
Client GALFAR ENGINEERING & CONTRACTING (INDIA) PVT. LTD.
by: Khanna
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT (A1) AND FOUNDATION FOR ROB AT CH. Date & 17/07/2013
Job Name
211+865 Rev. (R1)

width of section (Dx) = 0.00 mm


Depth of Section (Dy) = 600.00 mm
Gross Cross sectional area (Ag) = 0 mm2

Gross Moment of Inertia Igxx = 0.00E+00 mm4


Gross Moment of Inertia Igyy = 0.00E+00 mm4

Calculation of Modular Ratio:


Perimeter of section (u) = 1200 mm
2 Ac/u = 0.000 mm
For Dry atmosperic condition
Creep coeff. = 1.20
Eceff = Ecm = 1.52E+04
(1 + ø )

Modular Ratio (m) = Es/ Eceff = 13.20

Total Ast provided = 19426.82 mm2/m

pt = Ast/(b*D) = #DIV/0!

effective cover = 84.50 mm

C.g. Of Tension steel from N.A. (y) = 215.50 mm

Area of concrete, Ac = ( Ag- Ast) = -1.94E+04 mm2

Transformed Area of Section AstT = Ac + m Ast = 2.37E+05 mm2

Transformed M.O.I (Ixx) = Igxx+(m-1).Ast . y^2


= 0.00E+00 + 1.10E+10
= 1.10E+10 mm4

Section modulus (Zxx) = Ixx /( Dy/2)


= 3.67E+07 mm3

Bending stress ( M/ Zxx ) = = #DIV/0! N/mm2

Tensile strength of concrete , fctm = 3.03 N/mm2 #DIV/0!

Sectional Properties of Cracked Section:


Stresses under Service load are usually within Linear Elastic Range hence such analysis involved use of Modulus ratio.

Effective Depth deff (dy) = 515.50 mm


Depth of neutral axis ( yb) = k * dy
where , k - = sqrt{ 2 pt *m + (pt*m)^2 } - pt* m
= #DIV/0!

Depth of Neutral axis from Extreme compression face(yb) = #DIV/0! mm


Depth of Neutral axis from Extreme Tension face(yt) = #DIV/0! mm
Depth of Neutral axis from c.g. of tesion steel (ys) = #DIV/0! mm

Cracked Moment of Inertia ( Ixxcr) = Dx *(k * dy)^3/3 + m Ast * (dy - k * dy)^2


= #DIV/0! mm4

Maximum compressive stress in concrete= Mxx/Ixxcr * yb = #DIV/0! N/mm2 #DIV/0! 19.2


###
Maximum Tensile stress in concrete= Mxx/Ixxcr * yt = #DIV/0! N/mm2 #DIV/0! 3.03

Maximum Tensile stress in steel= m * Mxx/Ixxcr * ys = #DIV/0! N/mm2 #DIV/0! 300

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/255 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT SLS - Abut. Cap
DESIGN CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR 4-LANING OF KASHIPUR- Designed
Project Vishal
SITARGANJ SECTION OF NH-74 by:

Checked Summet
Client GALFAR ENGINEERING & CONTRACTING (INDIA) PVT. LTD.
by: Khanna
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT (A1) AND FOUNDATION FOR ROB AT CH. Date & 17/07/2013
Job Name
211+865 Rev. (R1)

###

Crack Width Check in Abutment Cap

Depth = 600.00 mm
Maximum Dia of Tension Reinf. = 32.00 mm
Effective depth , deff = 515.50 mm
Area of Steel on Tension, Ast = 19426.82 mm2 / m

Check for crack width : Refer Clause 12.3.4 of IRC:112-2011

Wk = Sr max (εsm - εcm)

Where, Sr max = maximum crack spacing


εsm = mean strain in the reinforcement
εcm = mean strain in concrete between cracks

Below Formula For Calculation of Sr max is applicable if the spacing between the reinf. is less or
= 422.50 mm
equal to 5*(c+φ/2)
Provided Spacing of Reinf. On tension face = -7.47 mm Hence OK

Sr max = 3.4 c + 0.425 k1 k2 φ


r r ef

Clear Cover , c = 40 mm
Diameter of Main Bar , φ = 32 mm
Coefficient , k1 = 0.8 for Deformed bars
Coefficient , k2 = 0.5 for Bending
Depth of Neutral axis = #DIV/0! mm

r r eff = As/Ac eff , where Ac,eff =effective area of concrete in tension surrounding the reinf.

hc eff = Min of 2.5 (Dy - dy ) ,Dy - yb/3 , Dy/2 = #DIV/0! mm

Ac, eff = Dx * hc,eff = 0.00 x #DIV/0! = #DIV/0! mm2

r r eff = #DIV/0!

Sr max = 136.00 + #DIV/0! = #DIV/0! mm

(εsm - εcm) = σsc - kt fct eff (1 + αe r r ef )


r r eff ≥ 0.6 ssc/Es
Es
Where ,
Stress in the tension reinf. = σsc = #DIV/0! N/mm2 from Rare Combination

kt = 0.50

Tensile strength of concrete = fct eff = fctm = 3.03 Mpa

αe = Es where , Es = 2.00E+05 N/mm2


Ecm Ecm = 3.33E+04 N/mm2

αe = 6.00
0.6 ssc/Es = #DIV/0!

(εsm - εcm) = #DIV/0! - #DIV/0! = #DIV/0! #DIV/0!


2.00E+05

Wk = #DIV/0! mm #DIV/0!

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/256 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT c.g. of sidl
ANNEXURE-I
CRASH BARRER =
175
Area = Trans. eA x Ecc. Long. EcA x Ecc.
200 Seg.1 450 x 156 = 70200 mm^2 X 78 5475600 225 15795000
Seg.2 337.5 x 250 = 84375 mm^2 X 281 23709375 168.75 14238281
Seg.3 200 x 500 = 100000 mm^2 X 656 65600000 100 10000000
500 Seg.4 175 x 200 = 35000 mm^2 X 1006 35210000 87.5 3062500
Total Area = 289575 mm^2 1.3E+08 43095781
225 = 0.290 m^2
Wt.of Crash Barrier = 0.290 x 25
= 7.239 kN/m
250 say 7.5 kN/m
450
156 Transverse Eccentricity @ Deck Top Lvl. = 448.92 mm

450 Long. Ecc. Back edge = 148.82 mm

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/257 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT SLS For Abut. Cap-column type a
DESIGN CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR 4-LANING OF KASHIPUR- Designed
Project Vishal
SITARGANJ SECTION OF NH-74 by:

Checked Summet
Client GALFAR ENGINEERING & CONTRACTING (INDIA) PVT. LTD.
by: Khanna
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT (A1) AND FOUNDATION FOR ROB AT CH. Date & 17/07/2013
Job Name
211+865 Rev. (R1)

Stress Check of Abutment Cap


Summary of Load over Cantilever Portion of Cap: Rare Combination

1) Summary of Load over Cantilever Portion of Cap: Normal Case

Moment (MT)
Factored
@ face of
Loads from superstructLoad Facto Vertical Eccentricity (m)
Abutment
load (kN)
(kNm)
DL 1.00 1126.926 4.335 4885.596
SIDL without W.C. 1.00 113.022 4.335 489.988
Wearing Coat 1.00 288.378 4.335 1250.214
LL 1.00 39.237 4.335 170.104
1567.563 6795.901

Moment (MT)
Factored
@ face of
Vertical load Eccentricity (m)
Abutment
(kN)
(kNm)
Weight of Pedestal 1.00 0.000 4.335 0.000
Weight of Tran. Seismic Arrestor 1.00 0.000 0.000 0.00
Weight of Long. Seismic Arrestor 1.00 0.000 0.000 0.00
Weight of Abutment Cap 1.00 0.000 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0.000 #DIV/0!

Total Flexural Moment ( Mu) = #DIV/0! kNm

Torsional Moment and Shear Force

Unbalance Long. Force responsible for Torsional moment @ face of = 1567.56 kN


Eccentricity of unbalance force = 0.000 m
Torsional moment @ face of Abutment ( Tu) = 0.16 kNm

Flexural Torsional
Total Moment = + = #DIV/0! kNm
Moment Moment

Maximum compressive stress in concrete under rare combination = 19.2 N/mm2

Maximum tensile stress in steel under rare combination = 300 N/mm2

Section Properties of Uncracked Section:


width of section (Dx) = 0.00 mm
y
Depth of Section (Dy) = 600.00 mm
Gross Cross sectional area (Ag) = 0 mm2

Dy Gross Moment of Inertia Igxx = 0.00E+00 mm4


x x Gross Moment of Inertia Igyy = 0 mm4
Dx
y

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/258 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT SLS For Abut. Cap-column type a
DESIGN CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR 4-LANING OF KASHIPUR- Designed
Project Vishal
SITARGANJ SECTION OF NH-74 by:

Checked Summet
Client GALFAR ENGINEERING & CONTRACTING (INDIA) PVT. LTD.
by: Khanna
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT (A1) AND FOUNDATION FOR ROB AT CH. Date & 17/07/2013
Job Name
211+865 Rev. (R1)

Calculation of Modular Ratio:


Perimeter of section (u) = 1200 mm
2 Ac/u = 0.000 mm
For Dry atmosperic condition
Creep coeff. = 1.20
Eceff = Ecm = 1.52E+04
(1 + ø )

Modular Ratio (m) = Es/ Eceff = 13.20

Total Ast provided = 19426.82 mm2/m

pt = Ast/(b*D) = #DIV/0!

effective cover = 84.50 mm

C.g. Of Tension steel from N.A. (y) = 215.50 mm

Area of concrete, Ac = ( Ag- Ast) = -1.94E+04 mm2

Transformed Area of Section AstT = Ac + m Ast = 2.37E+05 mm2

Transformed M.O.I (Ixx) = Igxx+(m-1).Ast . y^2


= 0.00E+00 + 1.10E+10
= 1.10E+10 mm4

Section modulus (Zxx) = Ixx /( Dy/2)


= 3.67E+07 mm3

Bending stress ( M/ Zxx ) = = #DIV/0! N/mm2

Tensile strength of concrete , fctm = 3.03 N/mm2 #DIV/0!

Sectional Properties of Cracked Section:


Stresses under Service load are usually within Linear Elastic Range hence such analysis involved use of Modulus ratio.

Effective Depth deff (dy) = 515.50 mm


Depth of neutral axis ( yb) = k * dy
where , k - = sqrt{ 2 pt *m + (pt*m)^2 } - pt* m
= #DIV/0!

Depth of Neutral axis from Extreme compression face(yb) = #DIV/0! mm


Depth of Neutral axis from Extreme Tension face(yt) = #DIV/0! mm
Depth of Neutral axis from c.g. of tesion steel (ys) = #DIV/0! mm

Cracked Moment of Inertia ( Ixxcr) = Dx *(k * dy)^3/3 + m Ast * (dy - k * dy)^2


= #DIV/0! mm4

Maximum compressive stress in concrete= Mxx/Ixxcr * yb = #DIV/0! N/mm2 #DIV/0! 19.2


###
Maximum Tensile stress in concrete= Mxx/Ixxcr * yt = #DIV/0! N/mm2 #DIV/0! 3.03

Maximum Tensile stress in steel= m * Mxx/Ixxcr * ys = #DIV/0! N/mm2 #DIV/0! 300


###

Crack Width Check in Abutment Cap

Depth = 600.00 mm
Maximum Dia of Tension Reinf. = 32.00 mm
Effective width , deff = 515.50 mm
Area of Steel on Tension, Ast = 19426.82 mm2 / m

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/259 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT SLS For Abut. Cap-column type a
DESIGN CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR 4-LANING OF KASHIPUR- Designed
Project Vishal
SITARGANJ SECTION OF NH-74 by:

Checked Summet
Client GALFAR ENGINEERING & CONTRACTING (INDIA) PVT. LTD.
by: Khanna
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT (A1) AND FOUNDATION FOR ROB AT CH. Date & 17/07/2013
Job Name
211+865 Rev. (R1)

Check for crack width : Refer Clause 12.3.4 of IRC:112-2011

Wk = Sr max (εsm - εcm)

Where, Sr max = maximum crack spacing


εsm = mean strain in the reinforcement
εcm = mean strain in concrete between cracks

Below Formula For Calculation of Sr max is applicable if the spacing between the reinf. is less or
= 422.50 mm
equal to 5*(c+φ/2)
Provided Spacing of Reinf. On tension face = -7.47 mm Hence OK

Sr max = 3.4 c + 0.425 k1 k2 φ


r r ef

Clear Cover , c = 40 mm
Diameter of Main Bar , φ = 32 mm
Coefficient , k1 = 0.8 for Deformed bars
Coefficient , k2 = 0.5 for Bending
Depth of Neutral axis = #DIV/0! mm

r r eff = As/Ac eff , where Ac,eff =effective area of concrete in tension surrounding the reinf.

hc eff = Min of 2.5 (Dy - dy ) ,Dy - yb/3 , Dy/2 = #DIV/0! mm

Ac, eff = Dx * hc,eff = 0.00 x #DIV/0! = #DIV/0! mm2

r r eff = #DIV/0!

Sr max = 136.00 + #DIV/0! = #DIV/0! mm

(εsm - εcm) = σsc - kt fct eff (1 + αe r r ef )


r r eff ≥ 0.6 ssc/Es
Es
Where ,
Stress in the tension reinf. = σsc = #DIV/0! N/mm2 from Rare Combination

kt = 0.50

Tensile strength of concrete = fct eff = fctm = 3.03 Mpa

αe = Es where , Es = 2.00E+05 N/mm2


Ecm Ecm = 3.33E+04 N/mm2

αe = 6.00
0.6 ssc/Es = #DIV/0!

(εsm - εcm) = #DIV/0! - #DIV/0! = #DIV/0! #DIV/0!


2.00E+05

Wk = #DIV/0! mm #DIV/0!

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/260 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Abutment Cap

DESIGN OF ABUTMENT CAP

0.0001
0.750 -0.750

0.3
0.3

0.3

0.00 0.00 0.00

As the cap is fully supported on the abutment. Minimum thickness of the cap required as per cl. 7
2014 is 225 mm.

Assuming a cap thickness of = 225 mm


Volume of abutment cap = 225 x
= 0.00E+00
as per cl. 710.8.7 of IRC : 78- 2014
Quantity of steel = 1 % of volume

= 1 x
100
(a) Longitudinal steel

Quantity of steel to be provided in longitudinal direction


= 0.00E+00 mm3

Clear cover = 50 mm

Length of bar = 12500 -100

Area of steel required in longitudinal direc = 0.00E+00

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/261 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Abutment Cap

12400

Provide 15 Nos. of 12 mm dia bar as longitudinal steel on top

Provided steel = 1696 mm2

(b) Transverse steel

Volume of steel to be provided in transverse direction =

Volume of steel required per meter = 0.00E+00 =


12.50

Provide 2L 12 mm dia bar @ 150

Length of each stirrups = 0 -100

Volume of steel provided per meter = -1.69E+05 mm3/m

Thickness of Abutment Cap (uniform) s = 0.3


Thickness of Abutment Cap (tapered) = 0.3

C.G. of dirt wall from face of abutment shaft (a) = 0.000


Overall depth of Abutment cap at face of abutment shaft = 0.600
Clear cover = 50
Diameter of the main bar = 16
Effective cover d' = 58
Effective depth of cap d = 0.542
For the section to be designed as corbel " a / d " shall be less than 1.

Hence a/d = 0 / 0.54


= 0.000

For the section to be designed as corbel " s / d " shall be greater than 0.5.

Hence s/d = 0.3 / 0.54


= 0.55

Note: THE ABUTMENT CAP HAS BEEN DESIGNED AS CORBEL FOR DIRT WALL AND LIVE L

1. Dead Load
Self Weight of Dirt Wall = 0.00311
Self Weight of Bracket = 0.135
= 3.375
Total Dead Load = 3.37811
Load Factor = 1.35
Ultimate Dead Load = 4.560448

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/262 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Abutment Cap

2. Live Load
Assuming Class 70R Boggie load, One Axle is Directly over Dirt Wall

Vertical Load on Dirt Wall = 200


Load Factor = 1.5
Factored Live load = 300

Actual horizontal force in normal case = 40.00


Effective width for this load is considered as ( b ) = 1000

Vertical Load (Vu)


Total maximum Vertical Load " V u " 304.56

Horizontal Load (Hu)

Hu = 1.7 x actual horizontal force in working load condition


but not less than
= 0.2 * V u

Total maximum Horizontal Load " H u " 68.00

Now the design for the corbel is carried out as per the following steps.

STEP I
Check for Nominal Shear Strength

Ensure V u / b d < = 0.15 fc'

where; Vu = 304.56 kN
= 304560.45 N

bd = 1000 x 542 sqmm


= 542000.00 mm2

Vu/bd = 304560.45 / 542000

Vu/bd = 0.56 N / mm2

fc' = 28 - day standard cylinder strength of c


= 0.80 times the standard cube strength
Grade of Concrete M 40
0.15 fc' = 0.15 x 0.8 x 40
= 4.80 N / mm2

Hence V u / b d < = 0.15 fc' is Ensured

STEP II
NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/263 Minor Bridge at 116+490
Design Calculation ICT Abutment Cap

Calculation of Shear Friction Reinforcement " A v f "

Vu
A vf =
0.87 fsy m

where; fsy = yeild stress value of the reinforcement


= 500.00 N/ mm2

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/264 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Abutment Cap

Type of Surface
1 Concrete placed monolithically across interface.
2 Concrete placed against hardened concrete but with roughened surface
3 Concrete anchored to structural steel
4 Concrete placed against hardened concrete but surface not roughened

Type of Surface ( 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 ) ? = 1.00

m = 1.40
( Note: Only monolithic construction is recommended )

304.57 x 1000
A vf =
0.87 x 500 x 1.4

A vf = 511.87 mm2
STEP III

Calculation for Direct Tension Reinforcement " A t ".

Hu
At =
0.87 fsy

Hu = 68.00 kn

68 x 1000
At =
0.87 x 500

= 156.32 mm2
STEP IV

Calculation for Flexural Tension Reinforcement " A f "

[ V u a + H u ( h - d' ) ]
Af =
0.87 fsy d

304.57 x 1000 x -0.05 + 68 x 1000 ( 60


=
0.87 x 500 x 542

= 156.26 mm2
STEP V

Total Primary Tensile Reinforcement " A s "

As >= (Af+At)

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/265 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Abutment Cap

>= ( 2 / 3 A vf + A t )
>= ( 0.04 fc' / fsy ) b d

(Af+At) = 156.26 + 156.33


= 312.58 mm2

( 2 / 3 A vf + A t ) = 2 / 3 x 511.87 + 156.33
= 497.57 mm2

( 0.04 fc' / fsy ) b d = 0.04 x 0.8 x 40 / 500 x 1000 x 542


= 1387.52 mm2

Hence As = 1387.52 mm2

STEP VI

The total sectional area of the stirrups is " A h " (closed ties) to be provided horizontally, one below

the other, and next to " As "

Ah >= 0.25 * A s

>= 0.333 * A vf

0.25 * A s = 0.25 x 1387.52


= 78.13 mm2

0.333*A vf = 0.333 x 511.87


= 170.45 mm2

Hence Ah = 170.45 mm2

STEP VII

The total steel in vertical stirrups is " A v "

Vc = 10 bd in kgs
= 10 x 100 x 54.2
= 54200.00 kg
= 542.00 kN
Pitch = 200 mm

Av = 0.50 * ( V u - V c ) * p
f sy d

= 0.5 x ( 304.57 - 542 ) x 200 x 1000


500 x 542

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/266 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Abutment Cap

Av = 0.00 mm2

Reinforcement Details

Total Primary Tensile Reinforcement " A s "

As = 1387.52 mm2
Diameter of Primary Steel = 16 mm

Area of one bar = 201.06 mm2

Spacing of Bar = 125 mm c/c


A s provided =
= 1608.495 mm2

provide 125 mm c/c 16 mm diameter bars as main reinforcement

Horizontal Steel ( Closed Stirrups) " A h "

Ah = 170.45 mm2

A h /m = 170.45 mm2 /m

The stirrups shall be provided below As and within a depth of " 2 / 3 d " below As.

2/3d = (2 / 3 ) x 542
= 362.00 mm

Diameter of Stirrup Bar = 10.00 mm

Area of one bar = 78.54 mm2

No. of layers of Stirrups = 5.00 nos.

Spacing of Stirrups = 72.400 mm

No. of legs of stirrups = 2.00


A h provided = 78.54 x 5 x 2
= 785.398 mm2

provide 2 legged. 10 mm diameter bars as horizontal stirrups in 5 laye

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/267 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Abutment Cap

Vertical Steel ( Closed Stirrups) " A v "

Av = 0.00 mm2

Av = 0.25 x As =
Av max = 346.88
A v /m = 346.88 mm2 /m

Diameter of Stirrup Bar = 10.00 mm

Area of one bar = 78.54 mm2

Pitch = 200 mm

No. of legs of stirrups = 2.00

A h provided =
= 785 mm2

provide 2 legged. 10 mm diameter bars as vertical stirrups at 200 mm spacing p

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/268 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Abutment Cap

0.3

0.3

m thickness of the cap required as per cl. 710.8.7 of IRC : 78-

0 x 12500
mm 3

projection = 0.3
% of volume

0.00E+00 = 0.00E+00 mm3

= 12400 mm

= 0 mm2 (top +Bottom) s

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/269 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Abutment Cap

mm dia bar as longitudinal steel on top & Bottom face of abutment cap.

0.00E+00 mm3

0.00E+00 mm3/m

mm c/c stirrups

-12 = -112 mm

CHECK

m
m

m
m
mm
mm
mm
m

< 1.0

> 0.5 Proceed with the design

AS CORBEL FOR DIRT WALL AND LIVE LOAD ON DIRT WALL

kN
m3/m x 25
kN
kN

kN

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/270 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Abutment Cap

kN

kN

kN
mm

kN

horizontal force in working load condition

kN

28 - day standard cylinder strength of concrete used.


0.80 times the standard cube strength

Ensured

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/271 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Abutment Cap

yeild stress value of the reinforcement used.

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/272 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Abutment Cap

rface m
1.40
d concrete but with roughened surface 1.00
0.70
d concrete but surface not roughened 0.60

mm2

304.57 x 1000 x -0.05 + 68 x 1000 ( 600 - 58 )


0.87 x 500 x 542

Provide the largest of


these three
magnitudes as As.
NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/273 Minor Bridge at 116+490
Design Calculation ICT Abutment Cap
Provide the largest of
these three
magnitudes as As.

mm2

mm2

0.04 x 0.8 x 40 / 500 x 1000 x 542

d ties) to be provided horizontally, one below

Provide the largest of


these two magnitudes
as Ah.

where b & d are in cms

0.5 x ( 304.57 - 542 ) x 200 x 1000


500 x 542

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/274 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Abutment Cap

> As R/F is adequate

ameter bars as main reinforcement

> Ah R/F is adequate

meter bars as horizontal stirrups in 5 layers per meter width

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/275 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Abutment Cap

346.88 mm2

> Av R/F is adequate

as vertical stirrups at 200 mm spacing per meter width

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/276 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Dirt_wall

DESIGN OF DIRT WALL


Dirt wall will be designed as a vertical cantilever.

1.) NORMAL CASE

1a. Dead Load

Self Weight of Dirt Wall = 0.002 m3 x

Self Weight of Dirt Wall/ m = 0.039 /

1b. Live Load

Assuming Class 70R Boggie load, One Axle is Directly over Dirt Wall

Vertical Load on Dirt Wall = 200

Braking Load

Assuming 20% braking Force i.e. 0.2 *200 = 40.000

Effective Width = 2.79

Moment (due to Breaking) = 40.000

1c. EARTH PRESSURE

F1

F2

section to check Shear

23.971 kN/m^2 6.71

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/277 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Dirt_wall

Normal Earth Pressure


Earth Pressure Diagra

Intensity for rectangular portion = 0.279 x 20

F1 = 6.705 x 4.29

Intensity for triangular portion = 0.2794 x 20

F2 = 0.50 x 23.97

Moment @ RL 749.21 m (at dirt wall base)

M1 = 28.765 x

(Centre of pressure considered at an elevation of 0.42 x the height of the wall as pe


M2 = 51.418 x

Design Horizontal Forces ( Normal Case):

Load Factor For Live Load Surcharge = 1.2


Ultimate Moment due to Live Load Surcharge = 74.042

Load Factor For Earth Pressure = 1.5


Ultimate Moment due to Earth Pressure = 138.968

Load Factor For Braking Force = 1.5


Ultimate Moment due to Braking Force = 118.065

Total Ultimate Moment = 331.074

Material Property:

Grade of Concrete = M
Characteristic Strength of Concrete,fck = 40.00
Grade of Reinforcement = Fe
Yield Strength of Reinforcement, fy or fyk = 500
Design Yield Strength of Reinforcement, fyd = 434.783
Modulus of Elasticity of Steel ( Es) = 200000

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/278 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Dirt_wall

(a) Vertical steel on earth face As per Clause 16.3.1 o


Adorting clear cover on either face = 50
Minimum Dia of Reinforcement = 25
Maximum Spacing of Steel = 125
Thickness of dirtwall = 0.300
Available effective depth = 300

Check for Depth:

Mult = 0.165 x fck x b x d^2 = 331.07

Effective Depth of Cap Required 331.07 x


= SQRT(
(dreq) 0.165 x 40.00

Total Depth Required ( Dreq) = 286.47 mm


Total Depth Provided (Dprov) = 300.00 mm

R= Mu/(b d^2) = 5.869

Area of Steel Required:


pt = Astreq = fck { 1 - sqrt( 1- 4.598 R/fck) }
100 bd 2 fy
Astreq = 4081.618 mm2/m
As per Clause 16.3.1 of IRC:112-2011
Minimum Reinforcement = 0.12/100 b x D
Maximum ( Astreq, Astmin ) = 6122.427 mm2/m

Increasing this by 50% to resist the increased tensile forces due to non linear stress
by note 8 of enclosure to Ministry of Surface Transport (India) Circular no. RW/NH - 3

Provide 25 mm dia bar @ 125 mm c/c as vertical ste

Provide Ast = 3927 mm^2/m ) Not OK

Percentage of Steel Provided = 1.653 %

Check for Moment of Resistance of section due to steel


Limiting Depth of Neutral Axis , Xm = 0.0035 . d
( 0.0035 + fyd/ Es)
= 146.5038 mm

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/279 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Dirt_wall

Depth of Neutral Axis , = fyd . Ast


0.36 . fck . b

= 435 x 3927
0.36 x 40.00

Lever Arm ( z ) between Compressive Force ( C) and Tensile Force ( T)

z = d - 0.416 . X
= 188.151 mm

Moment of Resistance of Section w.r.t. Steel ( MR)

MR = fyd . Ast . z =

= 3.2E+08 Nmm =

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/280 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Dirt_wall

CHECK

(b) Horizontal steel Refer Clause 16.3.2 of IRC:112-20

Adopting distribution steel bars Dia. = 12 mm


Minimum Area of Steel = 0.001x 0.5 x b x D OR 25% of Ast
0.001x0.5xbxD = 150 mm2/m

Governing Ast = 878.40 mm2/m

Maximum Spacing of Bars = 300 mm

Provide 12 mm dia bar @ 150 mm c/c horizontal ste

Provided Ast = 754 mm^2/m )


(c) Vertical steel on other face
As per Clause 16.3.1 of IRC:112-2011
Minimum Reinforcement = 0.12/100 b x D

Provide 12 mm dia bar @ 125 mm c/c as vertical ste

Provided Ast= 905 mm^2/m ) OK

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/281 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Dirt_wall

N OF DIRT WALL

25.00 = 0.039 kN

12.50 = 0.003 kN

kN

kN acting at 1.2 m above deck

x 5.490 = 78.710 kNm/m


2.79

Height of dirt wall = 4.290 m

section to check Shear stress

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/282 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Dirt_wall

Earth Pressure Diagram

x 1.2 = 6.705 kN/m^2

x 1.00 = 28.765 kN/m

x 4.290 = 23.971 kN/m^2

x 4.290 x 1.00 = 51.418 kN/m

2.145 = 61.702 kN.m/m

42 x the height of the wall as per cl. 217.1 of IRC:6-2014)


1.802 = 92.645 kN.m/m

kN.m/m

kN.m/m

kN.m/m

kN.m/m

40
Mpa at 28 days
500
N/mm2
N/mm2
N/mm2

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/283 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Dirt_wall

As per Clause 16.3.1 of IRC:112-2011


mm
mm
mm
m
-50 -12.5 = 237.5 mm

kNm/m

1000000 223.970 mm
) =
x 1000

OK

k { 1 - sqrt( 1- 4.598 R/fck) } = 0.017

= 360 mm2/m

e forces due to non linear stress pattern above the bracket.( as suggested
ort (India) Circular no. RW/NH - 34015 / 2 / 86 - S & R dated 22.6.94)

mm c/c as vertical steel at earth face.

= 0.0035 x 237.5
0.0035 + 0.00217

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/284 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Dirt_wall

= 118.628 mm
x 1000 OK

= 237.5 - 49.349

434.78 x 3927 x 188.15

321.246 kNm/m < 331.07 kNm/m


CHECK

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/285 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Dirt_wall

efer Clause 16.3.2 of IRC:112-2011

001x 0.5 x b x D OR 25% of Ast on Vertical Face


OR 878.401 mm2/m

mm c/c horizontal steel at both face.

Not OK

= 360 mm2/m

mm c/c as vertical steel at earth face.

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/286 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Return wall

Design of Solid Return wall

THICKNESS OF SOLID RETURN WALL =

THICKNESS OF CANTILEVER RETURN WALL =

Cantilever portion of return wall

A
0.600 3.267

4.000

Y direction

X direction
17.165

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/287 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Return wall

A'
Width of Solid Return a = 5.80
Avg. Heigth of Solid Return b = 16.265

a) Design of Solid Return wall

For design of return wall Load case 11.a & 11.d and their formulae given by Roa

Here, a/b = 0.357


a/b = 0.25 b1 = 0.182
a/b = 0.375 b1 = 0.353

For uniformly distributed load over entire plate

For, a/b = 0.357

Live Load Surcharge Intensity:


q = 0.2794 x 20.00 x 1.200

Max. .s b = b1 x

.s a = b2 x

.s b = 0.328 x

At bottom edge = 1376.353 kN/m2

For 1000 mm of width , Z =

Hence Moment /m width along Y direction -

My /m width = 1.376 x

= 96918162 Nmm/m

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/288 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Return wall

.s a = 0.367 x

= 1541 =

For 1000 mm of height , Z =

=
Hence, Moment /m height along X direction -

Mx /m height = 1.5412 x

= 108.524 kN.m/m

For triangular loading due to Earth Pressure


Refer Load case No. 11 d
a/b = 0.250 b1 = 0.133
a/b = 0.375 b1 = 0.212
For, a/b = 0.357

q = 0.279 x

= 90.883 kN/m^2

Max. .s b = b1 x

.s a = b2 x

sb = 0.200 x

= 11402.32 kN/m^2

= 11.402 MPa

For 1000 mm of width , Z =

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/289 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Return wall

=
Hence Moment /m width along Y direction -

My /m width = 11.402 x

= 802913716 Nmm/m

.s a = 0.139 x

= 7936.2 kN/m^2

For 1000 mm of height , Z =

=
Hence Moment /m height along X direction -

Mx /m height = 7.936 x

= 558.844 kN.m/m

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/290 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Return wall

Total Moment in Solid Return Wall / m height = 667.368

Total Moment in Solid Return Wall / m width = 899.832

Final Design Moments:

Load Factor for Earth pressure = 1.50


Load Factor for live load surcharge = 1.20

Total Moment(Mx) in Solid Return Wall / m height = 968.49


Total Moment(My) in Solid Return Wall / m width = 1320.67

Material Property:

Grade of Concrete = M
Characteristic Strength of Concrete,fck = 40.00
Grade of Reinforcement = Fe
Yield Strength of Reinforcement, fy or fyk = 500.00
Design Yield Strength of Reinforcement, fyd = 434.78
Modulus of Elasticity of Steel ( Es) = 200000.00

1. Design of Face BB'

Moment in Solid Return /m height ( including cantilever moment) =


= 968.495
= 1030.04

Adorting clear cover on either face = 75


Minimum Dia of Reinforcement = 32
Maximum Spacing of Steel = 150
Thickness of wall = 0.650
Available effective depth = 650
= 559
Check for Depth:

Mult = 0.165 x fck x b x d^2

Effective Depth of Cap Required (dreq) 1030.04


= SQRT(
0.165 x

Effective Depth of Cap Required (dreq) = 395.053

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/291 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Return wall

Total Depth Required ( Dreq) = 486.05


Total Depth Provided (Dprov) = 650.00

R= Mu/(b d^2) = 3.30

Area of Steel Required:


pt = Astreq = fck { 1 - sqrt( 1- 4.598 R/fck
100 bd 2 fy
= 0.008
Astreq = 4738.308

Minimum Reinforcement = 0.12/100


= 780

Maximum ( Astreq, Astmin ) = 4738.308

Provide 32 mm dia bar @ 150

Provide Ast= 5362 mm^2/m )


Percentage of Steel Provided = 0.959

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/292 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Return wall

Check for Moment of Resistance of section due to steel


Limiting Depth of Neutral Axis , Xm = 0.0035
( 0.0035 + fyd/ Es)

= 0.0035
0.0035

= 344.824

Depth of Neutral Axis , X = fyd . Ast


0.36 . fck . b

= 434.78 x
0.36 x

= 161.886 mm

Lever Arm ( z ) between Compressive Force ( C) and Tensile Force ( T)

z = d -
= 559 -
= 491.656 mm

Moment of Resistance of Section w.r.t. Steel ( MR)

MR = fyd . Ast . z

= 434.78 x

= 1.15E+09 Nmm

= 1146.124 kNm/m

Moment of Resistance of Shaft is More than Design Bending Moment , HENCE S

Provide 20 mm dia bar @ 150

Provided Ast = 2094 mm^2/m )

2. Design for Face A'B'


NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/293 Minor Bridge at 116+490
Design Calculation ICT Return wall

Moment in Solid Return /m width = 1320.67

Adopting clear cover on either face = 75


Minimum Dia of Reinforcement = 32
Maximum Spacing of Steel = 100
Thickness of wall = 0.650
Available effective depth = 650
= 527
Check for Depth:

Mult = 0.165 x fck x b x d^2

Effective Depth of Cap Required (dreq) 1320.67


= SQRT(
0.165 x

Effective Depth of Cap Required (dreq) = 447.327

Total Depth Required ( Dreq) = 538.33


Total Depth Provided (Dprov) = 650.00

R= Mu/(b d^2) = 4.76

Area of Steel Required:


pt = Astreq = fck { 1 - sqrt( 1- 4.598 R/fck
100 bd 2 fy
= 0.013
Astreq = 6886.046

Minimum Reinforcement = 0.12/100


= 780

Maximum ( Astreq, Astmin ) = 6886.046

Provide 32 mm dia bar @ 100

Provide Ast= 8042 mm^2/m )

Percentage of Steel Provided = 1.5261

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/294 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Return wall

Provide 20 mm dia bar @ 100

Provided Ast = 3142 mm^2/m )

Check for Moment of Resistance of section due to steel


Limiting Depth of Neutral Axis , Xm = 0.0035
( 0.0035 + fyd/ Es)

= 0.0035
0.0035

= 325.08

Depth of Neutral Axis , X = fyd . Ast


0.36 . fck . b

= 434.78 x
0.36 x

= 242.828 mm

Lever Arm ( z ) between Compressive Force ( C) and Tensile Force ( T)

z = d -
= 527 -
= 425.98 mm

Moment of Resistance of Section w.r.t. Steel ( MR)

MR = fyd . Ast . z

= 434.78 x

= 1.49E+09 Nmm

= 1489.549 kNm/m

Moment of Resistance of Shaft is More than Design Bending Moment , HENCE S

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/295 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Return wall

0.650 m

0.650 m

5.800
B

15.365
16.265

B'

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/296 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Return wall

m
m

their formulae given by Roark have been used.

b2 = 0.188
b2 = 0.398

b1 = 0.328
b2 = 0.367

= 6.705 kN/m2

q xb^2
(t1)^2

q xb^2
(t2)^2

6.705 x 264.550
0.423

= 1.376 MPa

1000 x 422500
6
7.04E+07 mm^3

7.042E+07

= 96.918 kN.m/m

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/297 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Return wall

6.705 x 264.550
0.423

1.5412 MPa

1000 x 422500
6
7.042E+07 mm^3

7.042E+07 = 1.085E+08 Nmm/m

b2 = 0.090
b2 = 0.148
b1 = 0.200
b2 = 0.139

20.00 x 16.27

q xb^2
(t1)^2

q xb^2
(t2)^2

90.883 x 264.550
0.42

1000 x 422500

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/298 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Return wall

6
7.042E+07 mm^3

7.042E+07

= 802.914 kN.m/m

90.883 x 264.550
0.42
= 7.936 MPa

1000 x 422500
6
7.042E+07 mm^3

7.042E+07 = 5.588E+08 Nmm/m

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/299 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Return wall

kN.m/m

kN.m/m

kN.m/m
kN.m/m

- Refer Table No 6.5 of IRC : 112-2011


40
Mpa at 28 days
500
Mpa
Mpa (1/1.15 * fy)
Mpa

+ 61.55
kN.m / m

mm
mm
mm
m
-75 -16
mm

0.165 x fck x b x d^2 = 1030.04 kNm/m

x 1000000
)
40.00 x 1000

mm

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/300 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Return wall

mm
mm OK

fck { 1 - sqrt( 1- 4.598 R/fck) }

mm2/m

bxD As per Clause 16.3.1 of IRC:112-2011


mm2/m

mm2/m

mm c/c as Horizontal steel at earth face.

OK
%

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/301 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Return wall

.d
( 0.0035 + fyd/ Es)

x 559
+ 0.00217

mm

5362
40.00 x 1000

OK

0.416 . X
67.344

5362 x 491.656

> 1030.04 kNm/m

n Bending Moment , HENCE SHAFT IS SAFE IN BENDING

mm c/c as Horizontal steel at non earth face.

OK

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/302 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Return wall

kN.m / m

mm
mm
mm
m
-75 -32 -16
mm

0.165 x fck x b x d^2 = 1320.67 kNm/m

x 1000000
)
40.00 x 1000

mm

mm
mm OK

fck { 1 - sqrt( 1- 4.598 R/fck) }

mm2/m

bxD As per Clause 16.3.1 of IRC:112-2011


mm2/m

mm2/m

mm c/c as vertical steel at earth face.

OK

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/303 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Return wall

mm c/c as Vertical steel at non earth face.

OK

.d
( 0.0035 + fyd/ Es)

x 527
+ 0.00217

mm

8042
40.00 x 1000

OK

0.416 . X
101.017

8042 x 425.983

> 1320.67 kNm/m

n Bending Moment , HENCE SHAFT IS SAFE IN BENDING

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/304 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Anne-I-DL & SIDL

4.0 w1 kN/m
Weight due to wearing coat w kN/m
ZDD
W1W2
W3
W1
W2
W3 Y
Wearing coat width = 5.750 m For Outer Girder
Wearing coat width = 5.750 m For Inner Girder
Weight of wearing coat including future= 2.2 kN/m2

UDL due to Wearing coat = 12.650 kN/m For Outer Girder


on entire length of girder = 12.650 kN/m For Inner Girder

Supp. Reaction , R = 262.488 kN For Outer Girder


= 262.488 kN For Inner Girder

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/305 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Anne-I-DL & SIDL

W1W2
W3 H1'
H1
H2
H3'
H3
W1
W2
W3 Y H1
H1'
H2
H3'
H3 Z
For Outer Girder

For Outer Girder

on each bearing

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/306 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT ANNEXURE-II -CWLL

ANNEXURE-II ( LOAD CALCULATION-CARRIAGEWAY LIVE LOAD )

Maximum Live Load Reaction Case


Due to Class A 1-Lane , 2-Lanes, 3-Lanes & 4-Lanes
Considering 114.00 kN
(I.e. 0.000m from extreme Left End)
Length of the Span = 40.00
Projection beyond cL of bearing at Abut. end = 0.750
Projection beyond cL of bearing at far end = 0.750
Total length including Overhangs = 41.50

A
0.750 40.000 m

RA
Pier

Axle Load Spacing Distance Distance Total


between of the axles of the axles Moment of
two from from the all Loads Reaction
in kN successive Extreme Support @ Support at Support
axles Left Node A A A
in metres in metres in metres in kN-m in kN
Ist Train Total Load 500.0kN

437.955
114.000 3.200 0.000 -0.750 -85.500
114.000 1.200 1.200 0.450 51.300
68.000 4.300 5.500 4.750 323.000
68.000 3.000 8.500 7.750 527.000
68.000 3.000 11.500 10.750 731.000
68.000 3.000 14.500 13.750 935.000

Due to Class 70R Wheeled


Considering 170.00 kN
(I.e. 0.000m from extreme Left End)
Length of the Span = 40.00
Projection beyond cL of bearing at Abut. end = 0.750
Projection beyond cL of bearing at far end = 0.750
Total length including Overhangs = 41.5

A
0.750 40.000 m

RA
Pier

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/307 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT ANNEXURE-II -CWLL

Axle Load Spacing Distance Distance Total


between of the axles of the axles Moment of
two from from the all Loads Reaction
in kN successive Extreme Support @ Support at Support
axles Left Node A A A
in metres in metres in metres in kN-m in kN
Ist Train Total Load 1000.0kN
170.000 0.000 -0.750 -127.500
170.000 1.370 1.370 0.620 105.400 890.655
170.000 3.050 4.420 3.670 623.900
170.000 1.370 5.790 5.040 856.800
120.000 2.130 7.920 7.170 860.400
120.000 1.520 9.440 8.690 1042.800
80.000 3.960 13.400 12.650 1012.000

Due to Class A 1-Lane/2-Lane (along with Class 70R)


Considering 68.00 kN
(I.e. 0.000m from extreme Left End)
Length of the Span = 40.00
Projection beyond cL of bearing at Abut. end = 0.750
Projection beyond cL of bearing at far end = 0.750
Total length including Overhangs = 41.5

A
0.750 40.000 m

RA
Pier
Axle Load Spacing Distance Distance Total
between of the axles of the axles Moment of
two from from the all Loads Reaction
in kN successive Extreme Support @ Support at Support
axles Left Node A A A
in metres in metres in metres in kN-m in kN
Ist Train Total Load 554.0kN
68.000 0.000 -0.750 -51.000
68.000 3.000 3.000 2.250 153.000 429.920
68.000 3.000 6.000 5.250 357.000
68.000 3.000 9.000 8.250 561.000
114.000 4.300 13.300 12.550 1430.700
114.000 1.200 14.500 13.750 1567.500
27.000 3.200 17.700 16.950 457.650
27.000 1.100 18.800 18.050 487.350

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/308 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT ANNEXURE-II -CWLL

Due to Class SV Loading


Considering 180.00 kN
(I.e. 0.000m from extreme Left End)
Length of the Span = 40.00
Projection beyond cL of bearing at Abut. end = 0.750
Projection beyond cL of bearing at far end = 0.750
Total length including Overhangs = 41.5

A
0.750 40.000 m

RA
Pier
Axle Load Spacing Distance Distance Total
between of the axles of the axles Moment of
two from from the all Loads Reaction
in kN successive Extreme Support @ Support at Support
axles Left Node A A A
in metres in metres in metres in kN-m in kN
Ist Train Total Load 3600.0kN
180.000 0.000 -0.750 -135.000
180.000 1.500 1.500 0.750 135.000 2385.000
180.000 1.500 3.000 2.250 405.000
180.000 1.500 4.500 3.750 675.000
180.000 1.500 6.000 5.250 945.000
180.000 1.500 7.500 6.750 1215.000
180.000 1.500 9.000 8.250 1485.000
180.000 1.500 10.500 9.750 1755.000
180.000 1.500 12.000 11.250 2025.000
180.000 1.500 13.500 12.750 2295.000
180.000 1.500 15.000 14.250 2565.000
180.000 1.500 16.500 15.750 2835.000
180.000 1.500 18.000 17.250 3105.000
180.000 1.500 19.500 18.750 3375.000
180.000 1.500 21.000 20.250 3645.000
180.000 1.500 22.500 21.750 3915.000
180.000 1.500 24.000 23.250 4185.000
180.000 1.500 25.500 24.750 4455.000
180.000 1.500 27.000 26.250 4725.000
180.000 1.500 28.500 27.750 4995.000

Deck Width = 12.500 m

transverse eccentyricity of superstructutre about c.g of abutment and foundation

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/309 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT ANNEXURE-II -CWLL

SV LOAD
transverse ecc. = 0.3 m
Maximum Reaction (RA) = 2385.000 KN Corr. MT
Minimum Reaction (RB) = 1215.000 KN Corr. MT

1-CLASS A
transverse ecc. = 6.25 -0.5 -0.4
Maximum Reaction (RA) = 437.955 KN Corr. MT
Minimum Reaction (RB) = 62.045 KN Corr. MT

2-CLASS A
transverse ecc. = 6.25 -0.5 -0.4
Maximum Reaction (RA) = 875.910 KN Corr. MT
Minimum Reaction (RB) = 124.090 KN Corr. MT

3-CLASS A
transverse ecc. = 6.25 -0.5 -0.4
Maximum Reaction (RA) = 1313.865 KN Corr. MT
Minimum Reaction (RB) = 186.135 KN Corr. MT

4-CLASS A
transverse ecc. = 6.25 -0.5 -0.4
Maximum Reaction (RA) = 1751.820 KN Corr. MT
Minimum Reaction (RB) = 248.180 KN Corr. MT

1- 70RW
Transverse Ecc. for 70RW = 6.25 -0.5

Maximum Reaction (RA) = 890.655 KN Corr. MT


Minimum Reaction (RB) = 109.345 KN Corr. MT

1-CLASS A + 1-70RW 3 LANE


Transverse Ecc. for Class A = 6.25 -0.5
for 70RW = 6.25 -0.5

Maximum Reaction (RA) = 1320.575 KN Corr. MT


Minimum Reaction (RB) = 233.425 KN Corr. MT

2-CLASS A + 1-70RW 4 LANE


Transverse Ecc. for 1st Class A = 4.45 m
for 2nd Class A = 4.45 -0.90
for 70RW = 2.7 -0.85

Maximum Reaction (RA) = 1750.495 KN Corr. MT

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/310 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT ANNEXURE-II -CWLL

Minimum Reaction (RB) = 357.505 KN Corr. MT

1- 70RW + 1-CLASS A - 3 LANE


Transverse Ecc. for 70RW = 6.25 -0.5
for Class A = 6.25 -0.5

Maximum Reaction (RA) = 1320.575 KN Corr. MT


Minimum Reaction (RB) = 233.425 KN Corr. MT

1- 70RW + 2-CLASS A - 4 LANE


Transverse Ecc. for 70RW = 3.155 m
for 1st Class = -2.650 m
for 2nd Class = -2.650 -0.9

Maximum Reaction (RA) = 1750.495 KN Corr. MT

Minimum Reaction (RB) = 357.505 KN Corr. MT

2- 70RW - 4 LANE
Transverse Ecc. for 1-70RW = 3.16 m
for 2-70RW = 3.155 -1.395

Maximum Reaction (RA) = 1781.310 KN Corr. MT

Minimum Reaction (RB) = 218.690 KN Corr. MT

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/311 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT ANNEXURE-II -CWLL

Summary of Reaction and Corresponding moments

Reaction Reaction
Max Reaction Cases Corr. MT (kNm)
(RA) , (kN) RB, , (kN)
1-CLASS A 437.955 1948.900 62.045
2-CLASS A 875.910 2364.957 124.090
3-CLASS A 1313.865 1248.172 186.135
4-CLASS A 0.000 0.000 0.000
1- 70RW 890.655 2810.017 109.345
1-CLASS A + 1-70RW 1320.575 2006.663 233.425
1- 70RW + 1-CLASS A 1320.575 1670.729 233.425
2-CLASS A + 1-70RW 0.000 0.000 0.000
1- 70RW + 2-CLASS A 0.000 0.000 0.000
2- 70RW 0.000 0.000 0.000

Maximum Reaction & Corresponding Transverse Moment


Reaction RA = 1320.575 KN & Corresponding moment
Reaction RB = 233.425 KN & Corresponding moment

Maximum Transverse Moment & Corresponding Reaction


Reaction RA = 890.655 KN & Max moment
Reaction RB = 109.345 KN & Max moment

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/312 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT ANNEXURE-II -CWLL

WAY LIVE LOAD )

Nos. of Lane for design purpose = 3 LANE

m
m
m
m

B
0.750

RB
Pier

Reactions (without Impact) for 1 Lane


Description At Supp-A At Supp-B
Reaction RA RB
at Support Reaction in kN 437.955 62.045
B
in kN

62.045

m
m
m
m

B
0.750

RB
Pier

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/313 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT ANNEXURE-II -CWLL

Reaction
at Support
B
in kN

109.345

Reactions (without Impact) for 70R Wheeled


Description At Supp-A At Supp-B
RA RB
Reaction in kN 890.655 109.345

m
m
m
m

B
0.750

RB
Pier

Reaction
at Support
B
in kN
Reactions (without Impact) for 1 Lane
Description At Supp-A At Supp-B
124.080 RA RB
Reaction in kN 429.920 124.080

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/314 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT ANNEXURE-II -CWLL

m
m
m
m

B
0.750

RB
Pier

Reaction
at Support
B
in kN
Reactions for SV Loading
Description At Supp-A At Supp-B
1215.000 RA RB
Reaction in kN 2385.000 1215.000

= 0m

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/315 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT ANNEXURE-II -CWLL

= 715.500 kNm
= 364.500 kNm

-0.9 0 0 = 4.45 m
= 1948.900 kNm
= 276.100 kNm

-1.8 -0.85 0 = 2.70 m


= 2364.957 kNm
= 335.043 kNm

-1.8 -1.7 -0.9 = 0.95 m


= 1248.172 kNm
= 176.828 kNm

-1.8 -1.7 -1.8 -0.85 = -0.8 m


= -1401.456 kNm
= -198.544 kNm

-1.2 -1.395 = 3.155 m

= 2810
= 345

-0.4 -0.9 = 4.45 m


-0.4 -1.8 -0.25 -1.8 -1.395 = 0.105

= 429.92 x 4.45 + 890.66 x 0.105 = 2007


= 124.080 4.45 + 109.345 0.105 = 564

-0.85 0 = 2.7 m
-1.8 -0.25 -1.2 -1.395 = -2.795

= 429.92 x 4.45 + 429.92 x 2.700 = 585


+ 890.66 x -2.795

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/316 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT ANNEXURE-II -CWLL

= 124.080 4.45 + 124.08 x 2.700 = 582


+ 109.35 x -2.795

-1.2 -1.395 = 3.155 m


-7.25 -0.25 -0.9 = -2.650 m

= 890.66 x 3.155 + 429.92 x -2.650 = 1671


= 109.345 3.155 + 124.080 -2.650 = 16

-0.85 = -4.400 m

= 890.66 x 3.155 + 429.92 x -2.650 = -221


+ 429.92 x -4.400

= 109.345 3.155 + 124.080 -2.650 = -530


+ 124.08 x -4.400

-1.2 -1.40 = -0.835 m

= 890.66 x 3.155 + 890.66 x -0.835 = 2066

= 109.345 3.155 + 109.345 -0.835 = 254

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/317 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT ANNEXURE-II -CWLL

Corr. MT
(kNm)
276.100
335.043
176.828
0.000
344.983
563.637
16.171
0.000
0.000
0.000

Corresponding moment = 2006.663 kNm


Corresponding moment = 563.637 kNm

Max moment = 2810.017 kNm


Max moment = 344.983 kNm

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/318 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Stability Check Summary
Design Calculation ICT Summary of Checks

Pmax (kN/m2) Pmin (kN/m2) Shear Shear (Toe


Description Sliding Overturning
(Heel slab) slab)

Normal Dry Case


Case 1 : DL+SIDL-Normal Dry Case 440.25 72.96 1.39 5.67
Case 2 : DL+SIDL+LL-(Maximum Reaction Case)-Normal Dry
473.96 64.09 1.28 5.17
Case
Permissible 484 0 1 1

Remarks O.K O.K O.K O.K

Normal HFLCase
Case 3 : DL+SIDL-Normal HFL Case 440.66 72.55 1.09 4.91
Case 4 : DL+SIDL+LL- (Minimum Reaction Case)-Normal HFL
448.35 64.44 1.02 4.49
Case
Permissible 484 0 1 1

Remarks O.K O.K O.K O.K

Longitudinal Seismic Dry Case


Case 5 : DL+SIDL-Long. Seismic Dry Case 466.95 46.65 1.55 5.42
Case 6 : DL+SIDL+LL-(Maximum Reaction Case)-Long. Seismic
480.51 38.16 1.54 5.34
Dry Case
Permissible 605 0 1 1

Remarks O.K O.K O.K O.K 1.511 1.083

Longitudinal Seismic HFL Case


Case 7 : DL+SIDL-Long. Seismic HFL Case 480.544 38.122 1.21 4.67
Case 8 : DL+SIDL+LL- (Minimum Reaction Case)-Long. Seismic
475.323 38.290 1.21 4.61
HFL Case
Permissible 605 0 1.00 1.00

Remarks O.K O.K O.K O.K

Transverse Seismic Dry Case


Case 9 : DL+SIDL-Trans. Seismic Dry Case 483.699 29.654 1.83 6.67
Case 10 : DL+SIDL+LL-(Maximum Reaction Case)-Trans.
490.442 27.878 1.89 7.31
Seismic Dry Case
Permissible 605 0 1 1

Remarks O.K O.K O.K O.K

Transverse Seismic HFL Case


Case 11 : DL+SIDL-Trans. Seismic HFL Case 490.030 28.288 1.49 6.47
Case 12 : DL+SIDL+LL- (Minimum Reaction Case)-Trans.
492.179 26.164 1.49 6.35
Seismic HFL Case
Permissible 605 0 1.00 1.00 4.703 4.703

Remarks O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K

Reinforcement summary
Area of
Type of reinforcement steel Area of steel provided
required

Heel Slab
32 mm bar @ 110 mm c/c (i.e.)
Main steel at bottom face 5133 7311 mm2 (O.K)
0 mm bar @ 300 mm c/c (i.e.)

Distribution reinforcement 1462 25 mm bar @ 220 mm c/c (i.e.) 2231 mm2 (O.K)

Provide Shear
Shear Reinforcement 12 mm 30 Legged bar @ 220 mm c/c (i.e.)
Reinf.

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/319 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT Summary of Checks
Toe Slab
32 mm bar @ 110 mm c/c (i.e.)
Main steel at bottom face 12106 14623 mm2 (O.K)
32 mm bar @ 110 mm c/c (i.e.)

Distribution reinforcement 2925 25 mm bar @ 150 mm c/c (i.e.) 3272 mm2 (O.K)

Provide Shear
Shear Reinforcement 12 mm 30 Legged bar @ 200 mm c/c (i.e.)
Reinf.

Abutment Shaft
32 mm bar @ 110 mm c/c (i.e.)
Vertical steel at earth face 10435 14623 mm2 (O.K)
32 mm bar @ 110 mm c/c (i.e.)
Vertical steel at non-earth
1800 25 mm bar @ 110 mm c/c (i.e.) 4462 mm2 (O.K)
face
Distribution steel 4771 20 mm 2 Legged bar @ 100 mm c/c (i.e.) 6283 mm2 (O.K)

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/320 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT ANNEXURE-I -CWLL
Annexure - II
Maximum Live Load Reaction Case
Due to Class A 1-Lane , 2-Lanes & 3-Lanes
Considering 114.00 kN
(I.e. 0.000m from extreme Left End)
Length of the Span = 40.00 m
Projection beyond cL of bearing at Abut. end = 0.750 m
Projection beyond cL of bearing at far end = 0.750 m
Total length including Overhangs = 41.5 m

A B
0.750 40.000 m 0.750

RA RB
Pier Pier

Axle Load Spacing Distance Distance Total Reactions (without Impact) for 1 Lane
between of the axles of the axles Moment of Description At Supp-A At Supp-B
two from from the all Loads Reaction Reaction RA RB
in kN successive Extreme Support @ Support at Support at Support Reaction in kN 437.955 62.045
axles Left Node A A A B
in metres in metres in metres in kN-m in kN in kN Reactions (without Impact) for 2 Lanes
Ist Train Total Load 500.0kN Description At Supp-A At Supp-B
RA RB
437.955 62.045 Reaction in kN 875.910 124.090
114.000 3.200 0.000 -0.750 -85.500
114.000 1.200 1.200 0.450 51.300 Reactions (without Impact) for 3 Lanes
68.000 4.300 5.500 4.750 323.000 Description At Supp-A At Supp-B
68.000 3.000 8.500 7.750 527.000 RA RB
68.000 3.000 11.500 10.750 731.000 Reaction in kN 1313.865 186.135
68.000 3.000 14.500 13.750 935.000

Due to Class 70R Wheeled


Considering 170.00 kN
(I.e. 0.000m from extreme Left End)
Length of the Span = 40.00 m
Projection beyond cL of bearing at Abut. end = 0.750 m
Projection beyond cL of bearing at far end = 0.750 m
Total length including Overhangs = 41.5 m

A B
0.750 40.000 m 0.750

RA RB
Pier Pier

Axle Load Spacing Distance Distance Total


between of the axles of the axles Moment of
two from from the all Loads Reaction Reaction
in kN successive Extreme Support @ Support at Support at Support
axles Left Node A A A B
in metres in metres in metres in kN-m in kN in kN
Ist Train Total Load 1000.0kN
170.000 0.000 -0.750 -127.500
170.000 1.370 1.370 0.620 105.400 890.655 109.345
170.000 3.050 4.420 3.670 623.900
170.000 1.370 5.790 5.040 856.800 Reactions (without Impact) for 70R Wheeled
120.000 2.130 7.920 7.170 860.400 Description At Supp-A At Supp-B
120.000 1.520 9.440 8.690 1042.800 RA RB
80.000 3.960 13.400 12.650 1012.000 Reaction in kN 890.655 109.345

Due to Class A 1-Lane (along with Class 70R)


Considering 68.00 kN
(I.e. 0.000m from extreme Left End)
Length of the Span = 40.00 m
Projection beyond cL of bearing at Abut. end = 0.750 m
Projection beyond cL of bearing at far end = 0.750 m
Total length including Overhangs = 41.5 m

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/321 Minor Bridge at 116+490


Design Calculation ICT ANNEXURE-I -CWLL
A B
0.750 40.000 m 0.750

RA RB
Pier Pier
Axle Load Spacing Distance Distance Total
between of the axles of the axles Moment of
two from from the all Loads Reaction Reaction
in kN successive Extreme Support @ Support at Support at Support
axles Left Node A A A B
in metres in metres in metres in kN-m in kN in kN
Ist Train Total Load 554.0kN Reactions (without Impact) for 1 Lane
68.000 0.000 -0.750 -51.000 Description At Supp-A At Supp-B
68.000 3.000 3.000 2.250 153.000 429.920 124.080 RA RB
68.000 3.000 6.000 5.250 357.000 Reaction in kN 429.920 124.080
68.000 3.000 9.000 8.250 561.000
114.000 4.300 13.300 12.550 1430.700
114.000 1.200 14.500 13.750 1567.500
27.000 3.200 17.700 16.950 457.650
27.000 1.100 18.800 18.050 487.350

Deck Width = 12.500 m

1-CLASS A
transverse ecc. = 6.25 -0.5 -0.4 -0.9 0 0 = 4.5 m
Maximum Reaction (RA) = 437.955 KN Corr. MT = 1948.900 kNm
Minimum Reaction (RB) = 62.045 KN Corr. MT = 276.100 kNm

2-CLASS A
transverse ecc. = 6.25 -0.5 -0.4 -1.8 -0.85 0 = 2.7 m
Maximum Reaction (RA) = 875.910 KN Corr. MT = 2364.957 kNm
Minimum Reaction (RB) = 124.090 KN Corr. MT = 335.043 kNm

3-CLASS A
transverse ecc. = 6.25 -0.5 -0.4 -1.8 -1.7 -0.9 = 1.0 m
Maximum Reaction (RA) = 1313.865 KN Corr. MT = 1248.172 kNm
Minimum Reaction (RB) = 186.135 KN Corr. MT = 176.828 kNm

1- 70RW
Transverse Ecc. for 70RW = 6.25 -0.5 -1.2 -1.395 = 3.155 m

Maximum Reaction (RA) = 890.655 KN Corr. MT = 2810


Minimum Reaction (RB) = 109.345 KN Corr. MT = 345

1-CLASS A + 1-70RW
Transverse Ecc. for Class A = 6.25 -0.5 -0.4 -0.9 = 4.45 m
for 70RW = 6.25 -0.5 -0.4 -1.8 -0.25 -1.2 -1.395 = 0.705

Maximum Reaction (RA) = 1320.575 KN Corr. MT = 429.92 x 4.45 + 890.66 x 0.705 = 2541
Minimum Reaction (RB) = 233.425 KN Corr. MT = 124.080 4.45 + 109.345 0.705 = 629

1- 70RW + 1-CLASS A
Transverse Ecc. for 70RW = 6.25 -0.5 -1.2 -1.395 = 3.155 m
for Class A = 6.25 -0.5 -7.25 -0.25 -0.9 = -2.650 m

Maximum Reaction (RA) = 1320.575 KN Corr. MT = 890.66 x 3.155 + 429.92 x -2.650 = 1671
Minimum Reaction (RB) = 233.425 KN Corr. MT = 109.345 3.155 + 124.080 -2.650 = 16.171

Summary of Reaction and Corresponding moments

Max
Reaction
Max Reaction Cases Reaction Corr. MT Corr. MT
RB
(RA)
1-CLASS A 437.955 1948.900 62.045 276.100
2-CLASS A 875.910 2364.957 124.090 335.043
3-CLASS A 1313.865 1248.172 186.135 176.828
1- 70RW 890.655 2810.017 109.345 344.983
1-CLASS A + 1-70RW 1320.575 2541.056 233.425 629.244
1- 70RW + 1-CLASS A 1320.575 1670.729 233.425 16.171

Maximum Reaction & Corresponding Transverse Moment


Reaction RA = 1320.575 & Corresponding moment = 2541.056
Reaction RB = 233.425 & Corresponding moment = 629.244

Maximum Transverse Moment & Corresponding Reaction


Reaction RA = 890.655 & Max moment = 2810.017
Reaction RB = 233.425 & Max moment = 629.244

CASE 2: MAXIMUM TRANSVERSE MOMENT (MT) CASE

RA ecc. (et) MT (max) RB MT(min)


1-CLASS A 437.955 4.45 1948.89975 62.045 276.100
2-CLASS A 875.91 2.70 2364.957 124.090 335.043
1-70RW 890.655 3.155 2810.01653 109.345 344.983

NH-88/SHIMLA-MATAUR ABUTMENT/322 Minor Bridge at 116+490

You might also like