You are on page 1of 3

McLoughlin, K 2015 Collectors, Collections & Collecting the Arts of China: Histories &

Challenges. Journal of Conservation and Museum Studies, 13(1): 7, pp. 1–3, DOI:


http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/jcms.1021225

BOOK REVIEW

Collectors, Collections & Collecting the Arts of China:


Histories & Challenges
Collectors, Collections & Collecting the Arts of China: Histories & Challenges,
Steuber, J, and Lai G. Eds. Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 327 pages, 2014

Kevin McLoughlin*

The origins of this richly fascinating and very welcome collecting early Chinese art among Chicagoan collectors
volume on the history of collecting Chinese art, part of the during the early to mid-twentieth century, with a particu-
David A. Cofrin Asian art manuscript series, lie in a sympo- lar focus on the Buckingham collection of early bronzes,
sium co-organized at the University of Florida in February and the Sonnenschein collection of jades. Pearlstein
2009 by Guolong Lai of the School of Art and Art History at elegantly illuminates the varied perspectives and roles
the University of Florida, and Jason Steuber of the Samuel played by influential and notable Chicagoan scholars,
P. Harn Museum of Art in Gainesville, Florida. A dozen dealers, businessmen, as well as those of Chinese scholars
papers presented at or solicited following the symposium and diplomats in the formation and development of these
are brought together in this volume. They deal with the collections.
collecting interests and enthusiasms of private collectors Deborah Del Gais evaluates the formation of the Chinese
and dealers and the vital role these individuals played in art collection at the Rhode Island School of Art and Design
the formation, fostering and development of a number of (RISD) Museum in chapter two. Del Gais’s study demon-
major Western museum collections of Chinese art. These strates how the formation of this collection came about
case studies also shed light on how the changing and very consciously as a result of a quite systematic and
evolving nature of taste, the art market, scholarship, and deliberate policy of acquisition by the Museum’s directors
political conditions and legal frameworks have combined and donors under Louis Earle Rowe (1882–1937), direc-
to affect collecting patterns over the past century. This vol- tor of RISD between 1912 and 1936. Del Gais describes
ume explores that history of dealing, collecting, connois- how Rowe made bold and farsighted decisions regarding
seurship, curating, authenticity, provenance, traditions the acquisition of Chinese material in line with a vision
of taste, and the contextualisation of Chinese art across of an encyclopaedic museum. Along with Miriam Banks
museum institutions in both North America and Europe, (1890–1965), RISD’s first curator, and with the support
with a particular emphasis on the early and mid-twentieth of Mrs Gustav Radeke (1855–1931) the then president of
century period. The editors of the volume have applied RISD, Rowe began actively acquiring Chinese archaeologi-
a conceptual grouping to the contributor essays, group- cal, mortuary, and Silk Road material at a time when these
ing them into three overlapping thematic sections dealing types of material were for the first time becoming avail-
with Early Collections; Collectors and Connoisseurs; and able to Western collectors.
Challenges in Collecting Chinese Art. Provenance comes In chapter three, Magnus Fiskesjö, director of the
much more to the fore in the Challenges in Collecting Stockholm’s Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities (MFEA)
Chinese Art section of the book, but throughout this vol- between 2000–2005, describes the outcome of the com-
ume the theme of provenance recurs as an issue of central peting scientific versus fine art paradigms at work in the
importance. formation and development of the MFEA over the course
The first three chapters in this volume, in the Early of the twentieth century. Opened to the public in 1926, the
Collections section, examine the formation of early collec- MFEA’s early vision was initially informed by its founder
tions in the United States and in Sweden. In chapter one, the archaeologist and palaeontologist Johan Gunnar
Elinor Pearlstein of the Art Institute of Chicago examines Andersson’s (1874–1960) vision of scientific archaeology.
the story of Chinese art collecting in early twentieth cen- This institutional vision shifted markedly in the 1960s with
tury Chicago. Centred on collecting at two very different a change both in MFEA’s administration and the integra-
institutions, the Field Museum and the Art Institute of tion of the Swedish national collections of Asian art into
Chicago, Pearlstein brings to life the very active interest in MFEA collections. Fiskesjö contextualises this significant
shift in institutional role and self-perception by examin-
ing it against the wider fine arts as opposed to scientific
* National Museum of Scotland, GB principles of museum display and collecting which have
k.mcloughlin@nms.ac.uk taken place in Europe over the course of recent centuries
Art. 7, page 2 of 3 McLoughlin: Collectors, Collections & Collecting the Arts of China

and considers what this has meant in terms of the MFEA’s leading figure in the Olympic movement, and as a very
changing approach to display didactics and catalogues. successful businessman. Xu’s essay focuses on one late
A biographical focus comes to the fore in the next five Shang inscribed bronze vessel in the shape of a rhinoc-
chapters of the Collectors and Connoisseurs section. In eros now in the Asian Art Museum collection, one of the
chapter four, Amy G. Poster examines the fascinating most famous Chinese bronzes in the world, and a vessel
career of R. Stewart Cullin (1858–1929), an ethnologist which was both acquired by and likened in its qualities
who became director of the University of Pennsylvania to Brundage himself. Beginning with the discovery of this
Museum of Archaeology and Palaeontology and from 1903 bronze rhinoceros in Shandong in 1845, Xu echoes other
the first curator of ethnology at the Brooklyn Museum. writers in this volume by noting the different emphases
Cullin’s interests also included Native American cultures, evident in Western and Chinese collecting and schol-
and his collecting biases strongly informed the collecting arship—namely the Chinese preference for epigraphic
of China in both institutions. Poster highlights Cullin’s scholarship in contrast to the Western emphasis on visual
influence on the display of China, both of vernacular cul- analysis.
ture and fine arts, at the Brooklyn Museum. The Challenges in Collecting Chinese Art section is
Zaixin Hong’s essay considers the role played by the art introduced with Stacey Pierson’s study of the influence
scholar and collector Florence Ayscough (1875–1942) in of a 1910 London exhibition—Early Chinese Pottery and
promoting modern Chinese painting in America during Porcelain at the Royal Academy—on the century of col-
the early decades of the twentieth century. Ayscough spent lecting tastes of Chinese ceramics since, and the fasci-
her early years in Shanghai, becoming a serious student nating way in which the influence of that exhibition has
of classical Chinese literature and poetry, and later devel- continued to play out to the present day. This exhibition
oping an avid interested in the modernist Chinese paint- marked a watershed in the understanding of categories of
ing. Collecting leading modern Chinese painters such as Chinese ceramics among collectors. Pierson demonstrates
Xugu (1824–1896) and Ren Yi (1840–1896) in Shanghai, how taste—described as traditional or academic of the
Hong deftly illustrates how Ayscough's pioneering efforts sort which defined Sir Percival David’s (1892–1964) col-
resulted in the introduction to America of a then virtually lecting tastes—has remained relatively unchanged while
unknown Chinese art form. issues of provenance now affect the marketplace in dra-
In the story of twentieth century Chinese art dealing matic new ways. This is evidenced in terms of the shift-
and collecting the name of the New York dealer C.T. Loo ing meanings behind certain categories of ceramics, with
(1880–1957) is among the most preeminent. In chapter ‘imperial’ being the most explicit example, and with the
six, Daisy Yiyou Wang looks at the fascinating role Loo development in recent decades of new collecting taxono-
played in the formation of the Chinese art collection at the mies. Given the prominence and influence of ceramics as
Freer Gallery during the first half of the twentieth century a category of Chinese art collecting, Pierson’s essay is a
by drawing upon that institution's rich archival resources. very necessary contribution to this volume.
Wang thoughtfully addresses the many complexities of In chapter eleven Jason Steuber situates the relatively
Loo as a dealer, not least his handling of material of dubi- recent 1990 foundation of the Samuel P. Harn Museum
ous if not illicit provenance and ownership. Wang con- of Art; the formation of that institution’s collection of
cludes on a positive note however, with the research and Chinese art, which seeks to apply the highest standards of
collaboration projects which have taken place between a contemporary best practice to new acquisitions by relat-
number of Chinese and US institutions to use new digi- ing them to current academic, museum, archaeological,
tal technologies to reconstruct Buddhist stone sculptures and legal frameworks and disciplines. In doing so, Steuber
from the cave temples at Xiangtangshan. illustrates the substantial evolution that has occurred in
Guolong Lai's study of the collecting of Chinese bronzes thinking around issues of provenance since the early to
at the Nelson-Atkins Museum unfolds around the differ- mid-twentieth century. Steuber very clearly demonstrates
ences in Western and Chinese approaches to collecting this shift with reference both to Harn’s own collection, and
based on traditions of connoisseurship, scholarly taste to national and international guidelines on provenance.
and preference, and the influence that Chinese collect- Continuing with the theme of provenance, this vol-
ing practises came to exert on Western collectors. Lai uses ume is brought to a thoughtful conclusion with Nick
two gui vessels and the historical debates which have Pearce’s essay which highlights both the value and rel-
taken place around their authenticity as the focus of his evance of developing provenance research on Chinese
essay, revealing not only how taste and scholarship have art collections. Pearce uses the example of provenance
developed and progressed, but also how techniques of research undertaken at the Burrell Collection in Glasgow
scientific analysis have developed to uncover previously through the innovative CARP (Chinese Art Research into
inaccessible knowledge about artefacts. Provenance) project, which resulted in the first online
Concluding the Collectors and Connoisseurs section, searchable database to deal with the subject of Chinese art
Jay Xu looks at the collecting behaviours of the collector, provenance. Using case studies centred on the outflow of
and founder of San Francisco’s Asian Art Museum, Avery artefacts from China during the 1920s and 1930s Pearce
Brundage (1887–1975). Brundage is a well-known and illustrates how initiatives such as CARP can be used to illu-
remarkable figure in annals of twentieth century Asian art minate and reconstruct both the activities of international
collecting in North America, known not only as an astute dealer networks, and the movement and distribution of
and adventurous collector of Chinese art, but also as a Chinese art artefacts among museum intuitions.
McLoughlin: Collectors, Collections & Collecting the Arts of China Art. 7, page 3 of 3

This is a richly detailed and scholarly volume comprised Collecting the Arts of China: Histories & Challenges provides
of thoughtful, incisive and finely grained essays, edited a richly multifaceted and major contribution of unique
throughout to the highest standard, in which the curato- scope and range to the history of Chinese art collecting.
rial perspective on collections’ formation is prominent to As such, this volume is required reading for anyone with a
a welcome degree. This is a particularly relevant collection professional or scholarly interest in the history of Chinese
of studies in an era when issues and challenges including art acquisition, collections’ formation and development, or
those of provenance, of cultural patrimony, and of access scholarship in North America and Europe over the course
in a Chinese art market of unprecedented size and dyna- of the last century.
mism have combined to comprehensively re-describe and
redefine the collecting environment for museums and col- Competing Interests
lectors acquiring Chinese art today. Collectors, Collections & The author declares that they have no competing interests.

How to cite this article: McLoughlin, K 2015 Collectors, Collections & Collecting the Arts of China: Histories & Challenges.
Journal of Conservation and Museum Studies, 13(1): 7, pp. 1–3, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/jcms.1021225

Published: 03 August 2015

Copyright: © 2015 The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,
provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/.

Journal of Conservation and Museum Studies is a peer-reviewed open access journal


OPEN ACCESS
published by Ubiquity Press.

You might also like