Professional Documents
Culture Documents
245.239×106 𝑢𝑚𝑎𝑥
0.87 × 500 × 𝐴st1 × 565 × (1 − 230×565×30 )
𝑋 ×500
When the Ultimate Moment of resistance of section exceeds the limiting value, MUlim
Compression reinforcement is obtained from the following equation
MU-MUlim fsc× Asc(d-d′)
d′ cover+ɸ/2
25+20/2
35mm
(297.194-245.398)×106 fsc× Asc(565-35)
98.026 ×103
From IS-456,Clause 38.1
98.026 ×103
0.87×500
225.34 mm2
fsc-Design stress in compression reinforcement corresponding to a strain εsc
From IS456 – Pg 70
𝑋𝑢𝑚𝑎𝑥 0.46
𝑑
𝑋𝑢𝑚𝑎𝑥 0.46 × 𝑑
𝑋𝑢𝑚𝑎𝑥 259.9 mm
εsc 0.0035(𝑋𝑢𝑚𝑎𝑥 −𝑑′ )
𝑋𝑢𝑚𝑎𝑥
εsc 0.0035(259.9−35)
259.9
εsc 0.0031
fsc εsc× Es ≤ 0.87×fy
εsc× 2×105≤ 0.87×500
605.74 ≤ 435 N/mm2
Asc 𝐴𝑠𝑡2 ×0.87×𝑓𝑦
𝑓𝑠𝑐
225.34×0.87×500
435
225.34 N/mm2
Ast Ast1+Ast2
1229.49+225.34
1454.83 mm2
Adopt 20mm ɸ as bottom reinforcement bar
Ast 1229.49 mm2
Number of bars 1229.49
314.15
3.913
Provide 4 # 20 mm ɸ bar as bottom reinforcement
0.717
Provide 2 # 20 mm ɸ bar as top reinforcement
𝛕v 𝑉𝑢
𝑏×𝑑
172.58×103
230×565
1.328
Pt 100×𝐴𝑠𝑡
𝑏×𝑑
100×6×314.15
230×565
1.45
From Table 19, IS 456 Page 73
1.25 0.71
1.5 0.76
1.45 0.75
𝛕v >𝛕c
Vus 𝑉𝑢 − 𝜏𝑐 × 𝑏 × 𝑑
172.58×103-0.75×230×565
75.117 kN
Using 8 mm ɸ two legged stirrup
Vus 0.87×2×𝑓𝑦 ×𝐴𝑠𝑣 ×𝑑
𝑆𝑣
Sv 𝜋×82
0.87×2×500×565×
4
75.117×103
328.92 mm
Provide 8mm ɸ 2 legged stirrups at 300 mm c/c as shear reinforcement.
Comparison of manually obtained Beam Design Results against BEAM DES Software
Slab
131
Effective depth,dy 131-8
123
Clear span in longer direction, 6200-230
5970
Clear span in shorter direction, 3735-230
3505
From IS456 2000 Clause 22.2
Effective length should be
minimum of c/c distance
orclaer span +eff. Depth
In Ly direction 5.97+0.123 6.093m
Or
5.97+0.23 6.2 m
In Lx direction 3.505+0.106 3.611m
Or
3.505+0.23 3.735 m
Effective length in longer 6.093
direction ,Ly
Effective length in shorterer 3.611
direction ,Lx
Ly 1.687<2
Lx
Hence the slab is designed as a
two way slab
Load clculations
Dead Load:
Self weight 0.15×25
3.75 kN/m2
Floor Finish 1 kN/m2
Total Dead load 4.75 kN/m2
Factored Load 7.125 kN/m2
Imposed Load:
Total Live load on slab 2 kN/m2
Factored Live Load 3 kN/m2
Total Factored load 10.125 kN/m2
α𝑦−𝑣𝑒 0.032
Short Span
+ve moment at mid span,
M𝑥+𝑣𝑒
α𝑥+𝑣𝑒 × W𝑢 × 𝐿𝑥 2
0.0439×10.125×3.6112
5.795 kN/m2
-ve moment at mid span,
M𝑥−𝑣𝑒
α𝑥−𝑣𝑒 × W𝑢 × 𝐿𝑥 2
0.0582×10.125×3.6112
7.683 kN/m2
Long Span
+ve moment at mid span,
M𝑦+𝑣𝑒
α𝑦+𝑣𝑒 × W𝑢 × 𝐿𝑦2
0.024×10.125×3.6112
3.1685 kN/m2
-ve moment at mid span,
𝑀𝑦−𝑣𝑒
α𝑦−𝑣𝑒 × W𝑢 × 𝐿𝑦2
0.032×10.125×3.6112
4.224 kN/m2
Check for effective depth
MUlim 0.1336×fck×b×d2
0.1336×25×1000×1312
57.31 kNm > Muy & Mux
Hence the depth provided is adequate
Flexural Reinforcement Calculations
Positive Moment
R 𝑀𝑢
𝑓𝑐𝑘 ×𝑏×𝑑 2
5.795×106
1000×1312
0.3376
𝐴𝑠𝑡
𝑓𝑐𝑘 4.598×𝑅
𝑏×𝑑
2𝑓𝑦
(1 − √1 − 𝑓𝑐𝑘
)
π×82
4
180
× 1000
279.25 mm2
Negative Moment
R 𝑀𝑢
𝑓𝑐𝑘 ×𝑏×𝑑 2
7.683×106
1000×1312
0.4477
𝐴𝑠𝑡
𝑓𝑐𝑘 4.598×𝑅
𝑏×𝑑
2𝑓𝑦
(1 − √1 − 𝑓𝑐𝑘
)
π×82
4
180
× 1000
279.25 mm2
Positive Moment
R 𝑀𝑢
𝑓𝑐𝑘 ×𝑏×𝑑 2
3.1685×106
1000×1312
0.1846
𝐴𝑠𝑡
𝑓𝑐𝑘 4.598×𝑅
𝑏×𝑑
2𝑓𝑦
(1 − √1 − 𝑓𝑐𝑘
)
π×82
4
× 1000
180
279.25 mm2
Provide 8 mm ɸ at 270 mm c/c.
Negative Moment
R 𝑀𝑢
𝑓𝑐𝑘 ×𝑏×𝑑 2
4.224×106
1000×1312
0.2461
𝐴𝑠𝑡
𝑓𝑐𝑘 4.598×𝑅
𝑏×𝑑
2𝑓𝑦
(1 − √1 − 𝑓𝑐𝑘
)
π×82
4
× 1000
180
279.25 mm2
L 6093
(d) 131
provided
46.51
𝐿
(as per IS 456:2000, 𝑑 = 26 )
251.3 mm2
MF 1
Ast req b×d
0.225+0.00322(0.5×fy× )−0.625×log( )
Ast pro. 100×Ast pro.
1
180 1000×131
0.225+0.00322(0.5×500× )−0.625×log( )
251.3 100×251.3
2.83
L 2.83×26
( )
d max
L
73.58> (d)
provided
Hence Safe.
Staircase
Design of staircase
fck 25 N/mm2
fy 500 N/mm2
Riser (R) 150 mm
Tread (T) 300 mm
Load calculation
4.192 kN/m2
Self-weight of step 20×0.15
2
1.5 kN/m2
Finishes 0.6 kN/m2
Live Load 2 kN/m2
Total Load 8.292 kN/m2
Factored Load 12.438 kN/m2
Loads on landing slab
Reactions
Design of Reinforcement
Main Reinforcement
Mu 32.874×106
bd2 1000×1242
2.13
2.10 0.542
2.15 0.557
2.13 0.567
Ast 124
0.567 × 1000 × 1000
703.08 mm2
Assuming 12 mm ɸ bars as main reinforcement
Spacing of 12 mm ɸ bars 113.09×103
703.08
160.8 mm
Provide 12 mm ɸ bars at 160 mm c/c
Distribution Reinforcement
Ast 0.12×1000×150
100
180 mm2
Assuming 8 mm ɸ bars as distribution
reinforcement
Spacing 50.26×103
180
279.22 mm
Provide 8 mm ɸ bars at 200 mm c/c
Mu wl2
8
9.525×2.62
8
8.648 kN/m
Column Number 1
Pu 5803 kN
My 462.695 kNm
Mx 136.066 kNm
Cover 40 mm
Fck 30 N/mm2
Fy 500 N/mm2
Breadth of Column 600 mm
Depth of Column 1050 mm
Check for BM due to minimum eccentricity:
ey min Lu 𝐷
+
500 30
3000 1050
+
500 30
41 mm >20mm
ex min Lu 𝐷
+
500 30
3000 600
+
500 30
26 mm >20mm
Muxe 5803×41
1000
Design Moments,
P/fck 2
30
0.067
Assuming 40 mm cover (severe condition as per table 16 IS 456),8 mm ties and 20 mm main bars
d′ 40 + 8 +
20
2
0.067
d′/D 58
1050
= 0.055
0.307
From Chart 47 of SP16
𝑀𝑢 0.11
𝑓𝑐𝑘 𝐷𝑩2
𝑀𝑢 = 𝑀𝑢𝑥1 fckDB2×0.11
30×600×10502×0.11
𝑀𝑢𝑥1 2182.95 kNm
P/fck 2
30
0.067
d′/D 58
600
= 0.096
0.307
From Chart 48 of SP16
𝑀𝑢 0.11
𝑓𝑐𝑘 𝐷𝑩2
𝑀𝑢 = 𝑀𝑢𝑥1 fckDB2×0.11
30×1050×6002×0.11
𝑀𝑢𝑥1 1247.4 kNm
Calcualaete Puz from chart 63 of SP 16 corresponding to P t=2%,fs=500 Mpa,fck=30Mpa
Puz 21×Ag
Puz 21×600×1050
1000
13230 kN
Check the capacity of assumed section
𝑃𝑢 5803
13230
𝑃𝑢𝑧
𝑃𝑢 0.438
𝑃𝑢𝑧
𝑃𝑢𝑧 represents bending about x and y axes respectively
α
Mux α Muy
[( ) +( ) ]≤1
Mux1 Muy1
Where
Mux and Muy are moments about x and y axes respectively due to design loads
Mux1 and Muy1 are the maximum uniaxial moment capacities with an axial load
𝑃
α is an exponent dependent on 𝑃 𝑢
𝑢𝑧
Mux 237.473
= 0.1087
2182.95
Mux1
Muy 462.695
= 0.3709
1247.4
Muy1
From SP 16 clause 3.3
0.2 1
0.8 2
0.438 1.396
Hence,
α
M α M (0.1087)1.396 + (0.3709)1.396
(M ux ) + (M uy )
ux1 uy1
0.295 < 1
Hence the trail section is safe under applied load
Provide
As 1050
2×600×
100
As 12600 mm2
Provide 32 mm ɸ bars
Number of bars 12600
π = 15.6
×322
4
16 no’s
Solution
Determine size of footing assuming weight of footing and backfill as 10%of coloumn load
16.3963
Size of square footing √16.3963
4.049 × 4.049
Provide 4.2×4.2 m
Factored net soil Presure,qu P×Υf
B2
Where
Υf – partial safety factors for load , also the factor used to determine unbalanced moment transferred
by flexure at slab column connection
qu P×Υf
B2
3726.44×1.5
4.2×4.2
0.3168 N/mm2
The critical section for one way shear is at a distance d from the face of the column
Vu1 qu ×B
2
× (B − C − 2d)
Where,
Vu1 qu ×B
2
× (B − C − 2d)
4200−600−2×d
0.3168×4200×( 2
)
663.6×(4200-600-2×d)
2388960 – 1327.2×d
970mm
980mm
Ks (0.5+βc ) < 1
βc – Ratio of short side to longer side of the column
βc 600
1050
Ks 0.5+0.5714
1.0714 < 1
Hence adopt 1
τc 0.25√fck
0.25√30
1.36
Hence
Vn2 K s × τc (4(C1 + d)d)
1 × 1.36(4(600 + 910)910)
7475.104 > 4853.72
Check for qa with the actual size of footing with the weight of concrete and soil as 24 kN/m3 and 18
kN/m3 respectively
q 3726.44
4.2×4.2
+ 24 × 0.91 + 18 ×
0.91
249.46<250 kN/m2
Hence safe
qu
Mu
8
× B × (B − C1 )2
0.316
8
× 4200 × (4200 −
600)2
2150.06 kNm
Mu 2150.06×106
bd2 4200×8502
0.7085
Pt = 0.166 %
As this % of steel is less than the % assumed for calculating shear strength i.e., 0.25% in step 2, shear
strength requirement governs the design hence
8925 mm2
Assuming 20 mm ɸ bars
Number of bars 8925
π
×202
4
29 bars
Spacing 4200−(50×2)−20
29−1
145.71 mm
Provide 20mm ɸ bars at 145 mm c/c
Hence Safe
5589.66 kN
As per C1 30.6 of IS456, limiting bearing stress
fbrmax A
0.45fck √A1
2
Where
fbr-Bearing stress at bends
At footing face,fck=30 Mpa
A1 (4200×4200) mm2
A2 (600×1050) mm2
A 4200×4200
√A 1 √
2 600×1050