Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Venous Tone
SANFORD I. COHEN, M.D., STUART BONDURANT, M.D.,
and ALBERT J. SILVERMAN, M.D.
PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE
COHEN ET AL. 109
Results Table 1 presents, for each subject, the
Venomotor Tone median of 4 determinations of the maxi-
mum pressure change following each of
In most instances, following each of the the stimuli. The range of pressure changes
3 stimuli pressure in the isolated venous of the group also is indicated. It is appar-
segment began to increase within 2 or 3 ent that there is considerable interindivid-
seconds, increased to a maximum between ual variation in the magnitude of the re-
30 and 60 seconds, and then returned slow- sponse (see discussion). In 8 of the 10 sub-
ly toward the prestimulus level (Fig. 1). jects, an increase in pressure was observed
This pattern of venomotor response is simi- during the silent period. In 9 of the 10,
lar to that which has been previously ob- the increase following the bland word was
served following various physical stimuli. greater than that which followed the silent
•It might be thought that occluding the cuffs at period. Seven of the 10 subjects manifested
320 mm. Hg could lead to the subject's experiencing a greater increase in pressure following the
pain which might account for some of the re-
sponses. This particular subject population was charged word than that after the bland
composed persons or who had been volunteers for word. A nonparametric analysis of this
many previous experiments at the laboratory in- data indicates that for the group the dif-
volving similar types of procedures. They did not ference in response of venous segments un-
report the cuffs as painful, although experienced
as a firm pressure. If the cuffs were left on longer der the 3 conditions is significant at the
than 5 minutes pain might be experienced. It level of P<.002.
should also be noted that the cuffs were inflated Table 2 shows the mean pressure change
during the silent, bland word and charged word during the silent, bland word, and charged
periods. Hence, if the cuff pressure was responsible
for some of the responses, it should have been an word periods in the total subject popula-
equivalent influence in the 3 (randomly distributed) tion. The range also is indicated. These
experimental periods. values are of interest since they indicate the
ISOLATED
SEGMENT
PRESSURE
(Cm HgO)
Fig. 1. Effect of psychic stimulation on venous pressure in one subject. (Paper speed of 25 cm./sec.)
VOL. xxii, NO. 2, 1960
110 PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY AND VENOUS TONE
TABLE 1. MEDIAN PRESSURE CHANGES IN ISOLATED TABLE 2. PRESSURE CHANGE IN ISOLATED VFNOUS
VENOUS SEGMENT (CM. HSO) SEGMENTS FOLLOWING PSYCHIC STIMULATION
(10 SUBJECTS)
Subject Stimulus
Silence Bland word Charged word Stimulus
Bland Charged
1 3.0 3.5 7.0 Silence word word
2 1.0 on 3.5
3 2.0 2.5 2.5 Mean maximal 2.7 6.9" 11.6"
4 0 3.0 4.0 pressure
5 3.5 4.0 6.0 change in iso-
6 4.0 6.0 10.0 lated venous
7 0 -1.0 -2.0 segment (cm
8 2.0 3.0 7.0 H2O)
9 1.5 14.0 10.0 Range (cm _3to+17 —1 t o + 2 4 + 1 to+32
10 5.0 13.0 18.5 H2O)
nl i 1 m i 9 i
range — 3 to + 17 — 1to + 24 + 1 to + 34
P < .002 P<.002 "Change significant P<.002.
PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE
COHEN ET AL. 111
differences in contrast to the mean, but ittionship to the various phases of the ex-
was used because nonparametric techniques periment was then noted.
had to be utilized with this type of data). Once again, the expected interindividual
(One subject had no GSR record because variability ot absolute numbers of non-
of mechanical problems.) specific fluctuations was obtained; however,
Except for subject 2, all showed an in- when intraindividual comparisons were
crease in the amplitude of response to made of the median number of responses
charged words. The group mean of the am- prior to and after each stimulus phase, dis-
plitude of specific GSRs in response bland tinct differences were obtained.
words was 2.9 cm. and in response to All subjects except 1 (who showed no
charged words was 7.0 cm. change) revealed a drop in the number of
The specific GSRs are not reported for nonspecific fluctuations after the silent pe-
the silent periods since there was no inputriod, indicating a decrease in arousal. A
equivalent to the word stimuli of the othersimilar decrease in nonspecific GSR was
periods. Of course, there were occasional seen after bland words in all but 1 subject.
However, the amount of decrease after
responses to the clicking of the microphone,
but these were not noted consistently and bland words was less than after silent pe-
were seldom marked. Occasionally a sub- riods (P = <.01).
ject would show a response during this After charged words the number of non-
period, and many of these the subjects re- specific GSR increased in all of these sub-
ported that they had been expecting a word jects. Nonparametric analysis revealed that
to be presented. However, except for the the increase after charged words was signifi-
occasional anticipatory response there werecantly different from the decrease after
few GSRs noted in this period. bland words (P = .01).
Figure 2 demonstrates the difference in
Nonspecific GSR Before and After Silent numbers of nonspecific GSR, before and
Periods, Bland Words, and Charged after the 3 experimental periods, in 8 of
Words the subjects. (One subject had no GSR
The number of spontaneous oscillations record at all because of instrument diffi-
of skin resistance which occurred in rela- culties, and 1 subject's nonspecific GSR was
(p<JOD
Amount of +8-
Increosein +6
Number In
Post Stimulus + 4
Period
J
Amount of
Decrease in
Number in
-2
.
"q
•••
Post Stimulus -6 ABCOEFGH AB CDEFGH ABCOEF GH
Period 8 (Subject)
SKIN RESISTANCE
"SPECIFIC' GSR 2:9 cm
pi. .01
VENOUS PRESSURE
( In Centimeters
11.6
Pi.OO2 pt.002
Fig. 3. Mean skin resistance and venous pressure changes with verbal stimuli.
not utilizable because the record was ob- caused by the stimulus. It appears plausible
scurred by movement and mechanical arti- to assume that if a change in 1 physiologic
fact.) measure (skin resistance) which reflects
Figure 3 shows the mean skin resistance peripheral sympathetic activity occurs, then
changes and venous pressure changes for physiologic changes in other systems in-
the subject population. nervated by peripheral sympathetic fibers
might be expected. However, Lacey20-21
has indicated that the magnitude of change
Discussion in different autonomic measures to the
It is recognized that the charged words same stimulus may be considerably differ-
were charged to variable degrees for the ent. Recent work has indicated that veno-
different subjects. To avoid having to rely constriction is a function of sympathetic
entirely on psychologic techniques for eval- impulses; hence an increase in pressure in
uating the effect of individual words on an isolated forearm vein segment might be
each individual subject, it was elected to assumed to be a result of sympathetic nerv-
group the responses to all preselected ous system discharge causing a constriction
charged words rather than attempt to se- of the vein wall.5'2T The skin resistance re-
lect post facto those words which had spe- sults strongly suggested that a charged word
cific meanings for the individual subject. caused a higher level of arousal and more
Since the words were equated in numbers intense sympathetic activity than bland
of syllables and delivered in random se- words (indicated by the greater magnitude
quence at equal volumes, it would seem of the specific GSR to the charged word
any difference in venomotor response must and increase in number of poststimulus
be related to the connotation of the word. nonspecific GSRs from the prestimulus
The magnitude of the decrease in skin state following the charged word as com-
resistance to a specific external stimulus is pared with the pre- and poststimulus non-
felt to be ultimately a function of the degree specific GSR difference after the silent and
of sympathetic nervous system activation bland word periods). Work by Wang has
PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE
COHEN ET AL. 113
indicated that the number of spontaneous his vein had reached a level of maximal
GSRs can be correlated with the level of constriction because of the high level of
reticular system stimulation.32 It is hy- arousal before the introduction of the
pothesized, then, that words which are emo- stimulus, and an increase in sympathetic
tionally charged cause a higher level of activity was no longer capable of causing
reticular-activating system stimulation and further constriction. This may be related
that this leads to an increase in posterior to Lacey's finding that persons in a state of
hypothalamic excitability. This, in turn, high autonomic excitement preceding
causes an increase in sympathetic discharge stimulation show very low autonomic re-
with charged words, which then leads to activity with stimulation.20-21
specific GSRs of greater magnitude and This hyperaroused subject's mean skin
more intense venoconstriction (although resistance responses during the pre-experi-
the magnitude of change in skin resistance mental rest period (nonspecific GSR), as
and venoconstriction may not be directly well as during the bland and charged word
parallel). stimulus periods (specific and nonspecific
The only exception to the above formu- GSR), is charted in Fig. 4, together with
lation was noted in 1 subject. This subject the mean venous pressure during these
showed no increase in venous pressure to stimulus periods (subject A). Subject B is
any of the experimental periods. However, presented for comparison. This subject
his skin resistance record indicated he was demonstrated a low level of arousal on his
highly aroused and the interview evalua- skin resistance record (as well as in his
tion suggested that he was in a state of EEG). He showed a rather marked in-
acute anxiety. The amplitude of specific crease in venous pressure when a bland or
GSR to charged words was greater than charged stimulus was presented. His skin
that to bland words (4.7 cm. versus 1.7 resistance record suggests he was more
cm.). The assumed failure of his vein to aroused by the charged words; however, he
constrict may be a function of the fact that had only a slight increase in his venous
SUBJECT A SUBJECT B
PRE-
EXPERI MENTAL
REST PERIOD
NON-SPECIFIC
9
PER MINUTE /MINUTE 'MINUTE
"BLAND" WORD
STIMULUS Il7c(n
MEAN GSR
RESPONSE 6/MINl/TE
MEAN
VENOUS
PRESSURE
iCHARGED WORD
STIMULUS
MEAN GSR 4.6 em
RESPONSE
^/MINUTE
MEAN
VENOUS
PRESSURE
Fig. 4. Venous pressure and skin resistance change in subjects at different levels
of arousal.
PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE
COHEN ET AL. 117
32. WANG, G. H., STEIN, P. H., and BROWN, V. W. Psychosom, Med. 5:274, 1946.
Brainstem reticular system and GSR in acute 34. WOOD, J. E., LITTER, J., and WILKINS, R. W.
decerebrate cats. /. Neurophys. 19:$50, 1956. Peripheral venoconstriction in human con-
53. WEISS, E. J. Psychogenic peripheral vasospasm. gestive heart failure. Circulation 13:524, 1956.