Evaluation Report CLAP-week

Rio Maior
May 2017

Compiled by:
João Correia
EB Marinhas do Sal
Rio Maior, Portugal

1
Table of Contents

Evaluation of activities during CLAP-week Rio Maior 3

May 2017 3
List of activities: 3
Evaluation questions (students): 3
Evaluation questions (Teachers): 4
A summary of the activities 5
How food shaped our cities Error! Bookmark not defined.
Language Error! Bookmark not defined.
Society 7
Domestic science 9
Ice skating 10
Sports 11
Science 12
City quizwalk 13

2
Evaluation of activities during CLAP-week
Gothenburg
December 2016

List of activities:
English Class- knowing each other
Visit to “Herbas” Company (organic farming)
Experimental activities with food
Sowing maps interpretation
Nest box workshop
Healthy food workshop
Traditional Games
Visit to “Planície Verde” Company (conventional farming, stocking and packing of fruits and
vegetables)
Lesson in CIDAC about fair trade
Experimental activities with seaweeds and other sea organisms at Peniche Polytechnic
School
Visit do CETEMARES Research Center
Pastery workshop
Surf Class
Visit to Cooperative Terra Chã

Evaluation questions (students):

The students that has participated in the activity have answered a form (google GSFT) with
the following questions.

1. Name and class

2. What have you done during the activity?
3. How informative have the activity been? *
4. What did you learn?
5. How good was the activity? *
6. What was good?
7. How difficult was the activity? *
8. What was difficult?
9. Other comments.

The questions mark with * was answered on a scale of 1 to 5.

The number of student that participated was about 120 from three different grades (grades
7, 8 and 9), and not every student participated in every activity.

3
Area of improvement, would be how to get a higher response rate. Since some of the
activities have a low response rate in this evaluation.

Evaluation questions (Teachers):

The teachers how was responsible for the execution of the activities, answered the following
questions. (The teachers used the same basic answering form as the student, but answered
the questions from a different perspective.)

Number of answers: 4

1. What have you done during the activity?

2. What did you learn?
3. What was good?
4. What was difficult?

Area of improvement, make a custom evaluation form for the teachers. The questions was
not really adapted for teachers, this makes it harder to draw any conclusions from the
answers.

4
A summary of the activities
Based on the 3 questions where the students answered on a scale, with the results
represented on absolut frequency graphs (X axis- evaluation categories; Y axis- number of
answers).

English Class- knowing each other

Number of answers: 19

How informative has the activity been?

How good was the activity?

How difficult was the activity?

5
1- less difficult
5- more difficult

Visit to “Herbas” Company (organic farming)

Number of answers: 18

How informative has the activity been?

How good was the activity?

6
How difficult was the activity?

Experimental activities with food

Number of answers: 24

How informative have the activity been?

7
How good was the activity?

How difficult was the activity?

8
Domestic science
Number of answers: 21

How informative have the activity been?

How good was the activity?

How difficult was the activity?

9
Ice skating
Number of answers: 37

How informative have the activity been?

How good was the activity?

How difficult was the activity?

10
Sports
Number of answers: 45

How informative have the activity been?

How good was the activity?

How difficult was the activity?

11
Science
Number of answers: 57

How informative have the activity been?

How good was the activity?

How difficult was the activity?

12
City quizwalk
Number of answers: 53

How informative have the activity been?

How good was the activity?

How difficult was the activity?

13