Professional Documents
Culture Documents
of the first quadrant. For a given fundamental peak voltage V1, it is required
to determine the S switching angles such that the selection of one angle is used to determine V1 and
remaining (S-1) angles are used to eliminate the same number of harmonics (generally lower order
harmonics), and also all switching angles should be in the range 0 ≤ α
1
through α
m
<α
2
< ... < α
5
≤ π/2. In three-phase power system, tripled harmonics are canceled out
automatically in line-to-line voltages as a result only
non-tripled odd harmonics are present in line-to-line voltages. [3], [4]. For an 11-level cascade inverter,
there are five bridges per phase i.e. S = 5 or five degrees of freedom are available; one degree of
freedom is used to control the magnitude of the fundamental output voltage and the remaining four
degrees of freedom are generally used to eliminate 5th, 7th, 11th and 13th order harmonic components
as they dominate the total harmonic distortion [5]. The modulation index, m is defined as the ratio of the
fundamental output voltage to the maximum obtainable voltage (maximum voltage is obtained when all
switching angles are zero). From (2), the relation between m and switching angles is given as: cos (α
1
) + cos (α
2
) +......+ cos (α
5
) = 5m ............ (4) Similarly from (2), expressions for 5th , 7th, 11th and 13th harmonic components
(scaled values) are given as: cos cos (5α (7α
1
1
) ) +cos +cos (5α (7α
2
2
) ) +......+cos +......+cos (5α (7α
5
5
))==hh
5
7 cos (11α
1
) +cos (11α
2
) +...+cos (11α
5
)=h
11 cos (13α
1
) +cos (13α
2
) +...+cos (13α
5
)=h
13 ............ (5)
Figure-2: output wave and the switching angles Equations (4) and (5) in combined form are known as
SHE (Selective Harmonic Elimination) equations in terms of five unknowns α
1
,α
2
,α
3
,α
4
and α
5
; provided that h
5
,h
7
,h
11
,h
13
are identically zero. For the given value of m (from 0 to1), it is required to get complete
and all possible solutions for the switching angle (0 to π/2) when the solutions exist, with minimum
computational burden and complexity. Following objective function is formulated to solve SHE equations
using optimization technique: Φ(α
1
,α
2
,α
3
,α
4
,α
5
)=
Now, (4) is to be minimized subject to equality constraints given by (2) and 0 ≤ α1 < α2 < ... < α5 ≤
Kazi R Huq, Kazi S S Huq, I Ahsan | A Comparative Study and Mathematical Analysis of Total
Harmonic Distortion in Multilevel Inverter Topologies in Induction Motor and A Proposed Level
for Optimum Operation π/2. Feasible solutions exist only where objective function (4) is
identically zero. 3.2. Relation between Total Harmonics Distortion (THD) and level of inverter:
Total Harmonic Distortion is a measure of harmonic distortion. Mathematically,
THD =
As the nth harmonic component goes low, THD also goes low. For multilevel inverter the harmonic if S =
number of levels than the one level is used to contribute to the magnitude of the fundamental voltage and
the other (S-1) levels are used for harmonic elimination. So as the number of levels(S) increases the
order of nth harmonic decreases and consequently THD also decreases. To put it in other terms, the
output waveform approximates pure sinusoidal waveform more accurately.
4. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS AND
SIMULATION RESULTS:
LEVEL
MODULATION INDEX
IFRSA’s International Journal Of Computing|Vol2|issue 4|Oct 2012 832
(%) THD 3 0.9 10.98 5 0.9 7.02 7 0.9 3.20
Figure 1: Level-3 Output Wave and THD
Figure 2: Level-5 Output Wave and THD
Figure 3: Level-7 Output Wave and THD
5. OPTIMUM LEVEL OF OPERATION
As we see the level of inverter plays a vital rule in the reduction of THD in the output voltage waveform.
But the use of multilevel inverter has following drawbacks- 1. Costs increase 2. Inverter reliability
decrease 3. Circuit complexity increase 4. Affects many sizing factors and control techniques. Therefore
the selection of optimum level of multilevel inverter is crucial. Trade-offs in specifying the number of levels
that the power conditioner will need and the advantages and complexity of having multiple voltage levels
available
Kazi R Huq, Kazi S S Huq, I Ahsan | A Comparative Study and Mathematical Analysis of Total
Harmonic Distortion in Multilevel Inverter Topologies in Induction Motor and A Proposed Level
for Optimum Operation are the primary differences that set a multilevel filter apart from a single
level filter. As a starting point, known is the nominal RMS voltage rating, V
nom,
IFRSA’s International Journal Of Computing|Vol2|issue 4|Oct 2012 833 In this paper a comparative study
of different level Multilevel inverter is studied and finally an optimum level of operation is proposed. The
simulation of various level of inverter is carried out in MATLAB Simulink. It is to be noted that among
various multilevel inverter topology the Cascaded H-Bridge (CHB) is most efficient, uses fewer
components as compared other multilevel topology and is a low loss topology and hence widely used
nowadays. The use of multilevel inverter greatly reduces the filter cost and complexity and ensures
smooth operation and high power quality.
REFERENCES
[1] Prathiba T, Renuga P, 2012: ‘A comparative study of Total Harmonic Distortion in Multi-level inverter
topologies’ Journal of Information Engineering and Applications, ISSN 22245782 (print) ISSN 22250506
(online) vol. 2, No.3. [2] Aghdam M, S. Fathi H and Gharehpetian G, ‘Harmonic Optimization Techniques
in Multi- Level Voltage-Source Harmonic Optimization Techniques in Multi-Level Voltage-Source’, JPE
8-2-8. [3] Peng F. Z, McKeever J. W, and Adams D. J, 1997: ‘Cascade Multilevel Inverters for Utility
Applications’, IECON Proceedings (Industrial Electronics Conference), vol. 2, pp.437-442. [4] Tolbert L.
M, Peng F. Z, and Abetler T. G, ‘Multilevel converters for large electric drives’, IEEE Transactions on
Industry Applications, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 36-44. [5] Jagdish Kumar, Biswarup Das, and Pramod Agarwal,
May 2009: ‘Harmonic Reduction Technique for a Cascade Multilevel Inverter’, International Journal of
Recent Trends in Engineering, Vol 1, No. 3.
.
of the electrical system to which the multilevel inverter will be connected. The dc link voltage
must be at least as high as the amplitude of the nominal line-neutral voltage at the point of connection, or
The √2 parallel ⋅V
nom
.
inverter must be able to inject currents by imposing a voltage across the parallel inductors, L
PI
, that is the difference between the load voltage, V
L
and parallel inverter output voltage V
PI
. The most difficult time to impose a voltage across the inductors is when
the load voltage waveform is at its maximum or minimum. Simulation results have shown that the
amplitude of the desired load voltage V
nom
should not be more than 70 percent of the overall dc link voltage
for the parallel inverter to have sufficient margin to inject appropriate compensation currents. Without this
margin, complete compensation of reactive currents may not be possible. This margin can be
incorporated into a design factor for the inverter. Because the dc link voltage and the voltage at the
connection point can both vary, the design factor used in the rating selection process incorporates these
elements as well as the small voltage drops that occur in the inverters during active device conduction.
The product of the number of the active devices in series (m-1) and the voltage rating of the devices V
dev must then be such that The V
device minimum rating.
(m-1) number ≥ √V
nom of levels . D
design and factor
the voltage rating of the active devices (IGBTs, GTOs, power
MOSFETs, etc.) are inversely related to each other. More levels in the inverter will lower the required
voltage device rating of individual devices; or looking at it another way, a higher voltage rating of the
devices will enable a fewer minimum number of levels to be used.
6. CONCLUSIONS