Professional Documents
Culture Documents
~ -26868681,26967842,26867341
~si?ll~~ ~ Fax:26865206
~~~~~JntRt
~iffie- mail: sec-nrpc@nic.in
~ Website: www.nrpc.gov.in
18-Tt, l?T.~ ~ +r11f, Cflc:<:t 1fb~ I~.
o:ti~-110016
Government of India
Ministry of Power
Northern Regional Power Committee
18-A, S. Jeet Singh Marg, Katwaria Sarai,
New Delhi-11 0016
FAX MESSAGE
"Bcrr if I To,
Members of Commercial Sub-Committee (As per List)
611 ftr1 R4 F.fl ;z-q- ~ ~ um ~ (~ «"<fl 'jfll"' )
~/Sir,
~ 28 ~, 2017 ciT ;z.~.fct.u. flt:~~'i Ofi&r, F.fl2:CIIft41 ~.~~if~ 00
611 ftr1 R4 F.fl ;z-q- ~ cfiT 33 cff ~
cfiT F.fll4fJ:"<fl ;zm ~ ~ ~ cfiT ~ Gl fll ~2:
www.nrpc.gov.in 111:: ~'a~ 1 31111 "fr ~'a~ fori ;zw ~if '8fi:i01Ria ~ CfiT ~~I
~:: :~ull:\~\~-
(~~~) •' 17) 7) 17
(Hemant Kumar Pandey) . ·
anft&1"0T~
Superintending Engineer
AGENDA
FOR
1
33rd meeting of Commercial Sub-committee (28.07.2017)-Agenda
2
33rd meeting of Commercial Sub-committee (28.07.2017)-Agenda
(Amount ₹ in Crs.)
Sl. Beneficiary Principal Surcharge Outstanding
N Outstanding Dues up to Dues including
o (more than 60 30.06.2017 Surcharge
. days)
1. PDD, J&K 449.44 230.62 680.06
2. UPPCL, UP 130.92 38.86 169.78
3. PSPCL, Punjab 102.75 15.90 118.65
4 BYPL, Delhi 243.14 124.40 367.54
The position of outstanding dues has become alarming and NHPC cannot
afford such huge amount of dues unpaid from any beneficiaries for a long
time.
The concerned utilities may liquidate the outstanding dues and surcharge on
priority and update the status.
ITEM-7 Consent for purchase of power from Naitwar Mori Hydro Electric Project
(NMHEP), (60 MW) in Uttarakhand (Agenda by SJVN)
This issue of extending consent of the beneficiaries was raised in the last 39th
NRPC & 35th TCC meeting. The consent from beneficiaries viz. Chandigarh,
BRPL, Haryana, J&K, Punjab and Uttarakhand is yet to be received.
Members may convey the consent for purchase of power, indicating the
quantum of power required from this Hydro project.
3
33rd meeting of Commercial Sub-committee (28.07.2017)-Agenda
ITEM-8 Delay in release of payment of energy bills of NJHPS and RHPS by its
beneficiaries (Agenda by SJVN)
As on 03.07.17, a total of Rs. 815.93 Crore (Rs 691.20 Crore towards NJHPS
and Rs 124.73 Crore towards RHPS) is outstanding for a period more than
sixty (60) days from the beneficiaries of SJVN. The beneficiaries who have
not cleared their outstanding dues are GOHP/HPSEB, BYPL, UPPCL and
PDD J&K.
The details of outstanding payments for these beneficiaries are as under:
i) GOHP: An amount of Rs 471.62 Crore is outstanding (i.e >60 days) from
GOHP (Rs. 382.79 Crore for NJHPS and Rs. 88.83 Crore for RHPS).
Govt of HP has assigned their allocated power of NJHPS & RHPS to
HPSEB from Dec 2013 and April 2015 respectively.
ii) PDD J &K: An amount of Rs 58.38 Crore is overdue from PDD, J &K
(Rs. 42.76 Crore for NJHPS and Rs. 15.61 Crore for RHPS) towards
energy supplied from NJHPS and RHPS. During the current FY PDD
,J&K had released Rs 39 Crores in April, 2017.
iii) BYPL: An amount of Rs 147.96 Crore is outstanding from BYPL. SJVN
has regulated the power of BYPL from NJHPS since Sept 2013. Till date,
BYPL has not shown any interest towards lifting of regulation of power
and has not paid any amount since Oct 14.
iv) UPPCL: An amount of Rs 93.42 Crore is overdue from UPPCL which
mainly comprises of late payment surcharge (LPS) (Rs. 77.80 Crore
towards NJHPS and Rs. 15.62 Crore towards RHPS).
The details of outstanding dues in respect of all beneficiaries is enclosed as
Annexure -III.
Beneficiaries may liquidate their outstanding on priority as it is affecting the
cash flow & MOU rating of SJVN and intimate the status in the meeting.
4
33rd meeting of Commercial Sub-committee (28.07.2017)-Agenda
5
33rd meeting of Commercial Sub-committee (28.07.2017)-Agenda
6
33rd meeting of Commercial Sub-committee (28.07.2017)-Agenda
7
33rd meeting of Commercial Sub-committee (28.07.2017)-Agenda
8
33rd meeting of Commercial Sub-committee (28.07.2017)-Agenda
OPENING
AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUNT
BALANCE
SQ PAYABLE RECEIVABLE PAID TO DISBURSED NET
UTILITY FROM
No. TO POOL FROM POOL POOL FROM OUTSTANDING(Rs
PREVIOUS
(Rs) (Rs) (Rs) POOL (Rs)
YEAR
1 CHANDIGARH -27.59 0.00 36.96 0.00 38.19 -26.37
2 DELHI 595.61 63.34 23.91 48.87 0.00 586.17
HIMACHAL
3 -70.79 0.00 64.30 1.30 107.14 -29.25
PRADESH
JAMMU AND
5 3561.39 1443.38 0.00 2924.00 0.00 2080.77
KASHMIR
6 PUNJAB 560.79 86.10 78.62 82.97 0.00 485.29
7 RAJASTHAN -312.01 0.00 212.79 0.00 348.31 -176.48
8 UTTARAKHAND -17.77 23.82 4.51 23.93 19.51 -2.87
UTTAR
9 -1393.56 0.00 892.95 0.00 1911.68 -374.83
PRADESH
9
33rd meeting of Commercial Sub-committee (28.07.2017)-Agenda
10
33rd meeting of Commercial Sub-committee (28.07.2017)-Agenda
For injections & drawl, the list of points being used for injections / drawl points
along with their CT/PT ratios are uploaded in NRLDC website. The
constituents are requested to check their drawl / injection points and CT/PT
ratios being used. Comments/discrepancies, if any, on the same may please
be communicated to NRLDC at the earliest.
The Status from week 01 to 13 is as herein below (All fig In Rs. Cr.):-
11
33rd meeting of Commercial Sub-committee (28.07.2017)-Agenda
RRAS Billed
Surplus in DSM A/C
Week (2017-18)
(A) Regulation Regulation Net (D)=(B)-
UP (B) Down ('C) ('C)
W-1 (27.03.17 - 2.04.17) 9.48 12.79 0.00 12.79
W-2 (03.04.17-09.04.17) 17.91 11.60 0.01 11.58
W-3 (10.04.17-16.04.17) 14.88 6.87 0.06 6.81
W-4 (17.04.17-23.04.17) 11.51 7.72 0.01 7.71
W-5 (24.04.17-30.04.17) 1.45 16.14 0.04 16.10
W-6 (01.05.17-07.05.17) 18.01 22.44 0.02 22.42
W-7 (08.05.17-14.05.17) 14.52 22.54 0.04 22.50
W-8 (15.05.17-21.05.17) 13.01 4.39 0.32 4.07
W-9 (22.05.17-28.05.17) 15.83 6.42 0.40 6.02
W-10 (29.05.17-04.06.17) 11.11 7.92 0.15 7.77
W-11 (05.06.17-11.06.17) 15.66 6.50 0.11 6.39
W-12 (12.06.17-18.06.17) 11.04 5.91 0.35 5.56
W-13 (19.06.17-25.06.17) 12.23 3.47 0.58 2.89
Total 166.63 134.71 2.10 132.61
NRLDC vide letter dated 27-04-2017 has sent the reconciliation statements of
NRLDC Fee and Charges for the billing period Nov-16 to Mar-17 to all the
users. The users were requested to send the duly signed and verified copy of
reconciliation statement as a token of acceptance by 19.05.17. Only Railway,
Nptha Jhakri, Rampur, Uri, ADHPL, NTPC (All), Patran, NRSS XXXI (B), and
KWHPS reconciliation have been received.
Entities are requested to verify the Reconciliation statements and send the
duly signed copy as a normal practice. In case non receipt of any
communication till 08.08.2017, it will be presumed that statement stands
reconciled.
For the period Jan-17 to Mar-17, NRLDC has sent the reconciliation
12
33rd meeting of Commercial Sub-committee (28.07.2017)-Agenda
Entities are requested to verify the Reconciliation statements and send the
duly signed copy as a normal practice. In case non receipt of any
communication till 08.08.2017, it will be presumed that statement stands
reconciled
S
No. Name Of Constituents Rates in Rs / MWh
1 Punjab 1550
2 Haryana 330
3 Delhi 251.9
13
33rd meeting of Commercial Sub-committee (28.07.2017)-Agenda
4 Rajasthan 299.9
5 Uttar Pradesh 162.3
6 Himachal Pradesh 20
7 Uttrakhand 125.95
8 Jammu & Kashmir * 80
9 UT Chandigarh * 80
*ST Rates not intimated to NRLDC
Deduction of TDS on open access charges are being made under two heads
– one for POSOCO and one for POWERGRID, as per the payment schedule.
It is observed that details of TDS being deducted by the applicants under the
two heads while making the payment for short term open access bilateral
transactions are not being sent to the NRLDC on a regular basis.
NRLDC has intimated that TDS being deducted is to deposited with the Tax
authorities by the 7th of every month for the previous month & details be
submitted by the 10th of every month for the previous month along with
challan numbers. TDS Certificates may be submitted on a quarterly basis
after filing of return and reconciliation can be carried out subsequently.
TDS deducted
Sl. Acceptance Application Payment Payment Net
No. No & Date No & Date Date Due POSOCO POWERGRID Paid
Portion PORTION
14
33rd meeting of Commercial Sub-committee (28.07.2017)-Agenda
Amount to be
S.No. FY Name of Applicant
Deposited (Rs)
1 2012-13 NDPL 29,719
2 2013-14 HNGIL 3,25,136
3 2013-14 RPPC 24,67,720
4 2015-16 Provestment 6,318
Outstanding
Outstanding Outstanding Total
Interest
Applicant Interest for Interest for Outstanding
upto 31st Action Taken
Name FY -16-17 FY -16-17 for Interest
March-2016
for Q-1 ,2&3 Q-4 (Rs.) (Rs.)
(Rs.)
(Rs.)
Portal for
0 0 punching of
J&K 38327 38327
Application
Blocked
Provestment 43613 0 0 43613 -do-
RPPC 2502273 0 0 2502273 -do-
HPSEB 0 0 13533 13533 -do-
15
33rd meeting of Commercial Sub-committee (28.07.2017)-Agenda
Presently we are receiving data from 202 locations out of total 222 locations
through AMR.
The status of data receipt from the locations as below:
After the phase-wise completion of SAT for the locations commissioned, some
of the utilities have been asked to discontinue the sending of the weekly SEM
data through mail. However, in case of an emergency or communication failure,
as the case may be, the utilities may download the data through DCD and send
it by mail. As such DCD is required to be kept in charged condition.
Of late, there have been issues with the GPRS communication for 15 sites for
which SAT has been completed.
POWERGRID may take up the issue on priority basis with the vendor and
update the status for award of AMR for new locations.
Meter Statio
Sl. Element
No./Cod n/Utilit Issue Remarks(if any)
No. Name
e y
132kV
Line normally not in
NP-6668- Rajghat at UPPT Meter data not
1 service. Pending issue
A Lalitpur- CL being received
since last meeting.
UPPTCL
132kV Morwa Line normally not in
NP-1532- UPPT Meter data not
2 at Anpara- service. Pending issue
A CL being received
UPPTCL since last meeting.
3 NP-6805- 400kV Dadri UPPT Meter data not Matter reported to
16
33rd meeting of Commercial Sub-committee (28.07.2017)-Agenda
17
33rd meeting of Commercial Sub-committee (28.07.2017)-Agenda
meeting.
220Kv Side
ICT-1
NP-8171-
15 (33/220) at NTPC Polarity Issue Polarity to be reversed
A
Unchahar
solar
400 kV
NP-5404- Meter reading CT/PT Connections to
16 RAPPC-2 at PG
A NP-5404-A 1/3 be checked.
Kankroli-PG
220/132kV
Meter is not
ICT-3 Meter to be replaced by
NR-3224- functioning as
17 (220kV) at BBMB CTU/Matter intimated to
A informed by
Jalandhar- NR-2
BBMB
BBMB
220/132kV
CT/PT Connections to
NP-1349- ICT-2(220kV) Meter is
18 BBMB be checked/Issue to be
A at Hissar- reading half.
rectified by BBMB.
BBMB
400kV Sainj Meter reading
NR-3368- Meters to be replaced
HEP at zero for both
19 A NR- NHPC by CTU/Matter
Parbati-II Main and
3420-A intimated to NR-2
HPS Check
33 kV SEWA-
NP-8584- Meter data not Issue pending since last
20 III(J&K PDD) NHPC
A being received meeting
at SEWA-II
NR-3438- Main Meters is
400 kV ICT- Matter has been
A reading less as
21 I/II at Patran- PSTCL informed to Team
NR-3431- compared to
PTCL Patran
A 220 kV side
220 kV
Meter has been
22 NP-5475- Ganguwal-1 Data is not sent by
PSTCL shifted from
A at Bhari- Bhari PSTCL
Majra
PSEB
220 kV
Connection needs to be
NP-1563- Ganguwal-1 Polarity
23 PSTCL reversed by Majra-
A at Majra- Opposite
PSPCL
PSEB
Baglihar,PDD,J&K
400 kV
intimated that meter
24 NP-5478- Kishenpur- PDD, Meter data not
needs to be replaced by
A PG-2 at J&K received
PG and software needs
Baglihar
to be provided
220kV
PG/NR New Meter Meters to be installed at
25 Jammu-1 at
-2 Installation Jammu end
Salal HPS
220kV
PG/NR New Meter Meters to be installed at
26 Jammu-2 at
-2 Installation Jammu end
Salal HPS
27 NFL,Naya PG/NR New Meter Meters to be installed
18
33rd meeting of Commercial Sub-committee (28.07.2017)-Agenda
CTU has been advised to install the SEM’s on BBMB irrigation feeders (as per
Annexure-VI) vide email dated 21.03.2017.
ITEM-32 Utilities yet to Nominate Nodal officers for Interface Meter Issues
(Agenda by NRLDC)
a. UPJVNL( Rihand, Khara)
b. Punjab
c. PDD, JAMMU
d. NPCIL
Concerned utilities may respond.
ITEM-33 Locations not sending Interface Meter data by Tuesday during last four
weeks (Agenda by NRLDC)
19
'+I'"mf ij (etll ( Annexure-I
~ij"'I~4 if.! Phone-26868681 , 26967842
i\;<m Fax: 26865206
~ ~ ~ -mijl'flMT'fdB- f>ffi e-mail: sec-nrpc@nic.in
~Website: www.nrpc.gov.in
18-~, ~.~~lfl1f, etlaqlf{~1 'ij"('pf,
~~-110016
Government of India
Ministry of Power
Northern Regional Power Committee
18-A, 5. Jeet Singh Marg, Katwaria Sarai,
New Delhi-110016
"ft. ~~/clifiJIR4Cf1/202/~.-qr.~./ 20H1606; -6 102.. ~:31~,2017
No: NRPC/Comml/202/RTAl20171 Dated: 31 st May, 2017
To,
m-rn~~~
As per list enclosed
~ : ~ ftaffifi lJmU ~ ~
Subject: Issues of higer POC Charges
~/Sir,
20
3-TT«r ~:H Cfi 1'£
Government of India
. ~&4ct
.:. .
A'I'III("f4
Ministry of Power
~;;::?J~ fit a<f
... .:.
(f 11Tft't Cfl~ur
Central Electricity Authority
Jrr{. v. ~
Member Secretary
Regional Power Committee
Qutab Institutional Shaheed Jeet Singh Marg
Katwaria Sarai. New Delhi-110 016
Please find enclosed herewith the MoP's letter dated 20th April,2017 enclosing therewith
a note from the office of JS(D), Ministry of Power, on the above cited subject. It has been
mentioned in the said communications that many of the States have raised the issue of higher
PoC charges which are also being levied even for their dedicated lines for evacuation of power.
21
1. Superintending Engineer (Electrical), UT-Chandigarh 0172-2740475/2741105
2. General Manager (SLDC), DTL, New Delhi 011-23221059
3. Chief Engineer (SO&C), SLDC, HVPNL, Panchkula 0172-2560622
4. Chief Engineer, HPPC, Shakti Bhawan, Panchkula, 0172-2586836
5. Superintending Engineer, HP Load Despatch Society, Shimla 0177-2837543
6. Chief Engineer (System Operation), HPSEBL, Shimla 0177-2837543
7. Executive Engineer, (LDM&T), Jammu 0191-247 4233/2475321
8. Chief Engineer (PP&R), PSPCL, Patiala 0175-2367872
9. Chief Engineer, SLDC, PSTCL, Patiala 0175-2365340
10. Chief Engineer, RDPPC, Jaipur 0141-2740211
11. Chief Engineer (LD), SLDC, RVPNL, Jaipur 0141-2741856/2741920
12. Chief Engineer (Comml), UPPCL, Lucknow 0522-2287835
13. Chief Engineer (PS), SLDC, UPPTCL, Lucknow 0522-2287880
14. Chief General Manager, UPCL, Dehradun 0135-2763839
15. DGM (SO), SLDC, PTCUL , Dehradun 0135-2451160/2763570
16. Sr. Divisional Electrical Engineer( TO), Northern Railway, Allahabad 0532-2407282
17. General Manager (Commercial), NTPC, New Delhi 011-24364606
18. General Manager (Commercial), NCR-HQ NTPC, Naida 0120-2410064
19. Addl. General Manager (Comml.), NR-HQ, NTPC, Lucknow 0522-2720969
20. Chief Engineer (O&M), NHPC, Faridabad 0129-2272413
21. Chief Engineer (Comml.), NHPC, Faridabad 0129-2254042
22. General Manager (Comml.), SJVN Limited, Shimla 0177-2660211
23. General Manager (Comml.), THDC, Rishikesh 0135-2430764
24. GM (Comml.), APCPL, NOIDA 0120-2425944
25. Chief Superintendent, NAPS 05734-222111
26. General Manager (F&A), RAPS 01475-242134
27. Addl. General Manager(Comml.), NPCIL, Mumbai 022-25563350
28. General Manager, Comml., PGCIL, Gurgaon 0124-2571989
29. Vice President (BD), PTC, New Delhi 011-51659145/41659142
30. Vice President (Energy), Adani Export Ltd., New Delhi 011-26156363
31. DGM, ADHPL, NOIDA 0120-4323271
32. Director, JSWEL, New Delhi 011-6032343/26183546
33. AGM, SCL, Beawar 01462-228117/228119
34. Director, Lance Anpara Power Ltd. 0124-2341627
22
Annexure-II
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
Inputs of NLDC on the issues raised by Principal Secretary, Energy, Govt. of Rajasthan
1. Suspect Theory: The mechanism for sharing of transmission charges in India has evolved
over the last three decades. Many methods like contract path methodology, MW‐mile
methodology, short run marginal cost pricing, long run marginal cost pricing etc. have been
discussed in literature. Considering the uniqueness of the Indian Power system, Average
Participation, Marginal Participation, and Zone to Zone methods were considered suitable
for further discussions. The hybrid of average and marginal participation methods was
adopted after nationwide consultation and discussions in various fora involving industry
experts and academicians across the country. In accordance with the practices in the world,
load flow studies give accurate signals, provided assumptions are correct. Further, the
hybrid method is based on load flow studies and provides an elegant way of handling a
multiple organization‐multiple licensee scenario.
2. Divergence in projected and actual data: As per sub‐clause (d) of clause (1) of Regulation 7
of the Principal Regulations, DICs have to submit the projected generation and demand data.
However, Rajasthan has not submitted data with regard to forecasted generation and
demand for 1st quarter and 2nd quarter of FY 2016‐17. As per the provisions of the
Regulations, the peak demand and generation is projected based on the last three year’s
data. Forecasted generation is further normalised with respect to forecasted All India Peak
Demand Met to arrive at Approved Injection. The projected peak demand of each State/UT
thus arrived is normalized with the projected All‐India peak demand met of the Application
Period under consideration. Consideration of generation and demand data along with the
network elements for PoC computations are discussed and finalized in the Validation
Committee meeting. Validation Committee is chaired by Chief (Engg.), CERC and member
secretary of regional power committees, heads of RLDCs, senior officers from CTU, SLDCs,
generating companies and inter‐state transmission licensees are the members of the
Validation Committee.
Transmission charges are to be known upfront and it should give proper signal to
beneficiaries and generators. Therefore, truing up or post facto adjustments should not be
done.
3. Apportionment of GSS Cost: Present methodology was finalised by the Hon’ble Commission
after detailed analysis and due consideration of various issues raised by stakeholders.
Charges corresponding to sub‐stations are included in the total monthly transmission
charges to be recovered. Transmission charges are assigned to each transmission line of ISTS
licensees for recovery of total transmission charges. These charges are assigned on the basis
of average cost computed for different voltage levels and conductor configuration.
Addition of any sub‐station in a control area may result in marginal increase in charges at a
particular node. However, the charges of other nearby nodes may decrease as the total
demand is constant.
4. Intended Use vs. Actual Use: Generators/IPPs should be encouraged to apply for LTA for full
quantum i.e. installed capacity. Implementation of General Network Access (GNA) may
address the issue raised by Rajasthan to some extent.
34
5. Billing of ISTS Charges for 675 MW power from BBMB: Regulation 3 of Central Electricity
Regulatory Commission, (Sharing of Inter‐State Transmission Charges and Losses)
Regulations, 2010 provide as under:
Quote
“Yearly Transmission Charges, revenue requirement on account of foreign exchange rate
variation, changes in interest rates etc. as approved by the Commission and Losses shall be
shared amongst the following categories of Designated ISTS Customers who use the ISTS:‐
(a) Generating Stations (i) which are regional entities as defined in the Indian Electricity Grid
Code (IEGC) or (ii) are having LTA or MTOA to ISTS and are connected either to STU or
ISTS or both
(b) State Electricity Boards/State Transmission Utilities connected with ISTS or designated
agency in the State (on behalf of distribution companies, generators and other bulk
customers connected to the transmission system owned by the SEB/STU/ intra‐State
transmission licensee)
(c) Any bulk consumer directly connected with the ISTS; and Any designated entity
representing a physically connected entity as per clauses (a), (b) and (c) above.
Unquote
Accordingly transmission charges of Inter‐State Transmission System shall be shared as per
provisions of the CERC (Sharing of Inter‐State Transmission Charges and Losses) Regulations.
Further, Appellate Tribunal in its judgement dated 14.12.2012 in Appeal No. 183/2011 filed
by BBMB has already declared the transmission system of BBMB as Inter‐State Transmission
System.
Further, CERC, vide its order dated 12.11.2015 in petition no. 251/GT/2013 and order dated
30.09.2016 in Review Petition No. 5/RP/2016, has allowed the Normative O & M
expenditure of BBMB transmission system for the period 2009‐14. Hon’ble Commission in its
order dated 12.11.2015 has further directed BBMB to file necessary petition for
determination of transmission tariff for the period 2014‐19 in accordance with provision of
the 2014 Tariff Regulations. The scheduling of power from the generating units of BBMB is
being done by Northern Regional Load Despatch Centre similar to the other ISGS. Hon’ble
Commission in its order dated 21.03.2016 directed that the commencement of scheduling
from the units of BBMB under ABT would be done with effect from 1.6.2016.
2nd proviso to definition of Approved Injection stipulated in Central Electricity Regulatory
Commission, (Sharing of Inter‐State Transmission Charges and Losses) Regulations, 2010
provides as under:
Quote
Provided further that where long term access (LTA) has been granted by the CTU, the LTA
quantum, and where long term access has not been granted by the CTU, the installed
capacity of the generating unit excluding the auxiliary power consumption, shall be
considered for the purpose of computation of approved injection.
Unquote
Based on the above proviso, approved injection from generating stations of BBMB has been
computed and corresponding allocations have been added to the withdrawal quantum of
beneficiaries.
35
Further, BBMB had submitted the details of Yearly Transmission Charges (YTC) for 4th
quarter of 2016‐17. The YTC details submitted by BBMB have been considered in PoC
computations for 4th quarter of 2016‐17. As per the extant Regulations, CTU has to collect
the transmission charges from all DICs on behalf of all ISTS transmission licensees and then
disburse the collected amount to these transmission licensees.
6. Comparison of ISTS Charges of Kerala and Rajasthan for Q3 of 2016‐17: PoC charges are
dependent on the specific location of each entity (injection/drawl) in the grid. As per the
load flow study case considered for 3rd quarter of 2016‐17, Rajasthan is drawing more power
from outside the state thereby utilizing more ISTS network to meet its demand. Final Billing
is done on the basis of Approved Withdrawal (LTA) quantum.
Transmission Charges Payable = (Sum of PoC rate, HVDC rate and Reliability Support charge
rate) x Approved Withdrawal
At present (Q4 of 2016‐17), PoC slab rate varies from Rs. 83787 /MW/Month to
Rs. 333036 /MW/Month. Such large difference in minimum and maximum slab leads to a situation
where utilities falling in higher slabs feel aggrieved. As per para 7.1.(3) of the tariff policy
“the spread between minimum and maximum transmission rates should be such as not to inhibit
planned development/augmentation of the transmission system but should discourage non‐optimal
transmission investment”.
Implementation of the above provision of tariff policy will help in addressing grievance of a number
of utilities.
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
Uttarakhand Power Corporation Ltd. \itt\'{\'(!10'$ -qjCR il)l'{4l~~'1 ~Q
(A Govt. Of Uttarakhand Undertaking)
Victoria Cross Vijeta Gabar Singh Urja Bhawan,
("""'"""•
ffloi510ff/; ""'
~,. ~)
mo '3W!f m;'T<R. qffqcft
Kanwali Road, Dehradun -248001 ?5'f<rcfr m: ~ - 248001
Phone: 91-135-2763830 Fax: 91-135-2763830 W<t&U$ ~ ~91-135-2763630 $ffi-g1-135-2763830
EPBX No-2763672-75 Cbt<<ift::tt=i ff?ro ;lo\fro"tio'l'fflo--2763672-75
Sir,
On the subject cited above kindly refer to your office letter no. NRPC/Comml
/202/RTA/2017/6063-6102 dated 31.5.2017 whereby relevant issues ofPoC charges related to
our organization have been sought.
In the matter it is to inform that since inception of PoC mechanism, the transmission
charges have increased many folds. Following data of the last 7 years reflect the excessive
hike in the transmission charges:-
F. Y. 2009-10 2010-11 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Tr. Charnes [Cr.] 90.93 127.79 153.82 190.26 218.88 380.01 419.10
Energy from Central 3530.2 4185.68 4249.77 4732.09 4788.29 5530.09 5487.89
Sector Stations [MU]
Per unit Tr. Charges 0.25 0.30 0.36 0.40 0.45 0.68 0.76
From the above illustrations it is evident that percentage increase in energy in the last 7-
8 years is approximately 55% whereas percentage increase in Transmission charges is
approximately 361%. Such abnormal hike in POC bill(s) of UPCL as a result of
implementation of the Sharing Regulations, 2015 resulting into retail tariff shock.
In view of such abnormal increase in the transmission charges and its consequential
adverse impact on retail tariff of UPCL it is requested to examine and review the factors
which are responsible for such abnormal hike in POC bills of UPCL and to take immediate
remedial measures to revise abnormal POC bill amount and thus enable UPCLto fulfill its
mandate to supply power to its consumers at affordable cost as stated in Section 61 of the
Electricity Act, 2003.
Yours faithfully,
(!Ujo~h~ol]
CE [Commercial]
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
I
Generation Projection (July 2017 • Sep 2017)
Generation deela~d Commcrelal from Generation declared/expected to be declared Commoreial
1st Oet '16 to Jht Mar'17 from 1st Apr'11to 30th June'17
I
51.
No. Entities
Projection
Regia s based on
3 Years
Bus Name
Unit
No.
Installed
Capacity
Gen.
eonsldere 5"b
Total
Bus Name Unit No,
lnstalle
d
Capaclt
Go~
considere Sub Total TOTAL
Comments From O!Cs
10ther5
,.,
Figure as Projected Generation
before normalization
Comments( w.r.t projected All India
" Data
d
y
d (if any)
PoC Data Peak Demand
'?
---
~
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
&.
June OS , 2017
To ,
Dear Sir,
st
This is refers to your letter no. NRPC/CommIl202/ RTN 2017/ 6063-6102 dated 31 May 2017 on
the aforesaid subject, our comments/ suggestion on POC charges are as under:
i. Hydro power projects does not utilize its whole Long Term Access (L T A Quantum) during
most of the months of the year as it generates for few hours per day based on variable
available water inflow. The POC rates for Hydro Generators should be considered
accordingly. There should have been a level playing field for Hydro Power Generators
(having PLF upto 50%) compared to Thermal Power Generators (having PLF upto 95%).
2. POC charges are not sensitive to quantum of flow and distance and hence are not in line
v.;ith r'~at i onal Electricity Policy.
3. Modalities needs to design where POC charges are levied only for used/accessed
transmission element by a respective DIC .
Thanking You ,
Yours truly,
For AD Hydro Power Limited
/ . .
(~¢t/ /
~.-// \\i /
Anil Kuma!:-Garg
Gene~/Manager-Business Development
P"
Annexure-III
Outstanding of SJVN as on 05/07/2016 (Rs. Crs.)
Outstanding Grand
Sr. Yet to be
Name of Beneficiary beyond 60 days Total
No. due
1 Chandigarh - - -
1 BRPL 17.36 15.01 32.37
2 BYPL 147.97 7.26 155.23
3 TDDPL - 4.65 4.65
4 HPPC - 13.15 13.15
5 HPSEB Ltd. 11.30 11.63 22.93
6 Govt. of HP 471.62 120.12 591.74
7 J&K 58.38 47.17 105.55
8 PSPCL 5.06 43.05 48.11
9 UPPCL 93.43 91.88 185.31
10 UPCL - 19.30 19.30
11 Ajmer VVNL - 2.74 2.74
12 Jaipur VVNL - .77 .77
13 Jodhpur VVNL - 8.55 8.55
14 DTL(Arrears 2004-08) 10.81 10.81
Grand Total 815.93 385.28 1201.21
76
33rd meeting of Commercial Sub-committee (28.07.2017)-Agenda
Annexure-IV
Deviation Charges
Deviation Delay
S No. CONSTITUENTS PAYABLE/ Total Outstanding
payment Interest
Receivable
77
Annexure-V
NRPC Bills dated 28-July-2015 (Week No-10 in F.Y. 2015-16)
**Recievable after
Payable as per Recievable as per Amount paid to
S N. Constituents S N. Constituents equating payable and
NRPC Bills NRPC Bills Constituents
r ecievable
9285798
1 JAMMU AND KASHMIR 7060915 1 UTTAR PRADESH 4413857 4413857
2 HARYANA 6671099 2 RAJASTHAN 8167797 3882431 3882431
3 UTTARAKHAND 2533873 3 PUNJAB 8993094 4274723 4274723
4 CHANDIGARH 943998 4 NHPC 8071170 3836501 3836501
5 DELHI 521720 5 NTPC 5409081 2571120 2571120
6 RAILWAYS 490560 6 SJVN 2051463 975130 975130
1003612
7 HIMACHAL PRADESH 286567 7 APCPL 477051 477051
8 GREENKO BUDHIL 453430 8 THDC 730197 347087 347087
9 EPPL 2294792 9 ADHPL 536941 255226 255226
10 SCL 402288 191221 191221
11 HBPCL (KWHPS) 68598 32607 32607
Total 21256954 Total 44720039 21256954 21256954
78
IRRIGATION WING CONSUMPTION FEEDER DETAILS AND CONTACT DETAILS. Annexure-VI
10 SUPPLY AT SLAPPER 11
Asstt. Engineer/Elect. Sub Divn. HPSEB,Slapper (HP) and SDO, 1907-286523, 9418486767 (JE)(HPSEB)
Commercial/sub division,BBMB, Slapper Div., Slapper and 9816093631(JE) (BBMB)
11 SUPPLY AT PANDOH 11
Asstt. Engineer/Elect. Sub Divn. HPSEB,Pandoh (HP). SDO
01905-282065,09418131022(SDO)
(Comml), BBMB, Pandoh.
12 SUPPLY AT SUNDERNAGAR 11
Asstt. Engineer/Elect. Sub Divn. HPSEB,Sunder Nagar (HP) SDO 01907-262356, 9816526841 (JE), & 9418-
(Comml) Sub Division, BBMB, Sunder Nagar. 159827 (Xen) (HPSEB)
14 4 MVA TRANSFORMER I.W. 11 Sr. Executive Engineer, Pong Power House, BBMB, Talwara. 01883-236103, 236152 (BBMB)
15 ENERGY TRANSMITTED TO I.W. THROUGH PONG 11
16 CONSUMPTION THROUGH UHA -I/II(52-H) breaker
(I.W.consumption) 11
17 33 KV MIRTHAL – TALWARA 33 Sub Station Engineer- Grid Maintenance, PSPCL, Sujanpur and 9646113863 (PSPCL) and
SDO,PM&T (sub Div.),BBMB,Talwara 9780029725 (BBMB)
18 IRRIGATION WING THROUGH 66KV PSEB CKT-I 66 Sub Station Engineer, 66 kV Grid Sub Station, PSPCL, Talwara. And 9646116799
Addl. SE/Op, PPH, BBMB (PW), Talwara.
19 IRRIGATION WING THROUGH 66KV PSEB CKT-II 66
79