Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Leigh-Ann Scott
Department of Mathematics
University of Strathclyde
Glasgow, U.K.
July 2007
i
Contents
1 Introduction 1
1.1 Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.2 Outline of Thesis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
ii
4.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
4.2 Formulation of the method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
4.2.1 The Geometry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
4.2.2 The Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
4.3 Boundary Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
4.4 The Admittance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
4.5 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78
4.5.1 Modal Analysis of Device A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79
4.5.2 Modal Analysis of Device B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97
4.6 Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101
iii
6.2 The Geometry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146
6.3 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151
6.3.1 The Cantor Set Transducer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151
6.3.2 The Sierpinski Carpet Transducer . . . . . . . . . . . . . 166
6.4 Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 172
7 Conclusions 174
iv
Chapter 1
Introduction
1.1 Background
In 1880, Jacques and Pierre Curie discovered that within certain crystalline
minerals, when subjected to a mechanical force, the crystals became electrically
polarized. Conversely, by applying an electric field to these materials, a me-
chanical deformation would occur. This behaviour was named the piezoelectric
effect from the Greek word piezein, meaning to press or squeeze. Piezoelectric
materials have been tailored to suit an impressive range of applications, such
as sensing (force or displacement sensors), actuation (motors and devices that
precisely control positioning) and sonic and ultrasonic signal generation. The
20th century introduced more powerful metal oxide-based piezoelectric ceramics
and man-made materials which enabled designers to develop more applications
for piezoelectricity. Manufacturing of these materials was relatively inexpensive
and ceramics could be easily created for a specific requirement. The most widely
used piezoelectric ceramics are ”PZT” ceramics, which are manufactured from
formulations of lead zirconate / lead titanate and exhibit great sensitivity and
can withstand high operating temperatures.
Ultrasonic transducers have found widespread use, particularly in ultrasonic
medical diagnosis and non-destructive testing. Ultrasound imaging is a stan-
dard procedure that catches images inside the body using high-frequency sound
1
2
waves. Since the images are captured in real time, ultrasound examinations
can show blood flowing through blood vessels, as well as the structure and
movement of the body’s internal organs. These devices are used frequently to
diagnose and treat medical conditions due to their affordability, portability and
that they don’t produce ionizing radiation (x-rays). Conventional ultrasound
devices display images in thin, flat sections of the body, though advancements
in technology include four-dimensional (4-D) ultrasound (3-D ultrasound image
in motion). Non-destructive testing is used to detect defects, such as crack or
corrosion, without destroying the object. This is vital in applications such as
rail and bridge inspections. The properties of these transducers dictate the abil-
ity of the transducer to work effectively and have been extensively investigated
over the last 30 years [24, 23, 10, 71, 25, 31, 26, 27, 46, 57, 14, 44, 54, 17].
There are 4 types of transducers which are widely used: monolithic piezoelectric
plate, composite, polyvinyliden difluoride (PVDF) and electromagnetic acoustic
(EMATS) transducers [70]. Piezoelectric transducers are the most common type
of transducer and can be used at higher frequencies than EMAT’s (1-50 MHz)
[34]. By applying an electric field to a transducer a mechanical deformation
occurs and conversely, a mechanical strain leads to an electric field being pro-
duced. Transducers can therefore work in both receiving and transmitting mode.
When the transducer is transmitting a voltage is applied which is converted from
electrical energy to mechanical energy (much like a loudspeaker). In reception
mode a stress wave is sensed by the transducer which is converted into electrical
energy to produce an electrical signal (much like the human ear). Composite
transducers are increasingly becoming the design of choice in biomedical, sonar
and nondestructive testing applications. This is due to the constituent mate-
rials combining to realise better operational characteristics and the availability
of new materials. The most frequently used designs are 1-3 and 2-2 composites
manufactured from piezoelectric ceramic materials. A 1-3 composite transducer
3
(a) (b)
is made by dicing the ceramic block into a series of pillars and then filling the
void with a passive phase. Topologically the connectivity is in only one direc-
tion for the ceramic (the black vertical pillars) but in all three directions for the
polymer (the white filler) (see Figure 1.1 (a)). For a 2-2 composite the ceramic
is cut longitudinally in one direction so that there is connectivity in two direc-
tions for both the ceramic and polymer (see Figure 1.1 (b)). The advantage of
these composites is that the combined materials give better electromechanical
coupling and acoustic impedance characteristics [29].
Due to the ability of molecules to support vibrations in solids, a number of
different types of wave modes can be found within a transducer. These wave
modes can be characterized by their oscillatory patterns. A longitudinal mode
is characterised by the motion of the material particles being in the same direc-
tion as the wave is travelling in. A shear wave is characterised by the motion
of the material particles being perpendicular to the direction the wave is trav-
elling in. Elliptical and complex vibrations at the surfaces and interfaces make
other waves possible such as surface and plate waves. A surface (or Rayleigh)
wave travels along the surface of a semi-infinite plate with the material particles
undergoing an elliptical motion. As the wave propagates deeper into the plate,
the particles will move in smaller ellipses until a no-movement depth is reached.
Plate waves only propagate in very thin metals, hence they are very common
4
within ultrasonic transducers. The most frequently found plate waves are Lamb
waves which are complex vibrational waves that travel through the entire thick-
ness of the transducer. Their propagation depends on the material properties
and the transducer thickness. One of the problems with the composite pillar
architecture is the presence of surface waves, which are generated between the
adjacent pillars (inter-pillar modes) or within the pillars (intra-pillar modes), in-
terfering with the piston like behaviour of the main thickness mode. Extensive
experimental observations have highlighted the intricate dependency between
the geometry of the design, the material properties and the operational charac-
teristics of the device. One key to an efficient composite transducer is to arrange
for the two phases to move in concert at the driving frequency. This is aided by
ensuring that the transverse wavelength (the wavelength in the direction per-
pendicular to the thickness direction) in the passive phase is much larger than
the lattice periodicity.
A transducer typically has a backing layer and matching layer and a dis-
crete set of electrodes on the upper face (see Figure 1.2). A backing layer will
damp out unwanted oscillations but reduces the sensitivity of the device and a
matching layer will optimise the amount of energy transferred into the mechan-
ical load. The geometry of a composite transducer is described by the pitch
(period of the polymer and ceramic pillar), the kerf width (the slot that the
blade cuts in the material) and the thickness. Since a piezoelectric ceramic is
anisotropic (the properties are directionally dependent), the physical constants
relate to both the direction of the applied mechanical or electric force and the
directions perpendicular to the applied force (transverse direction). A trans-
ducer can be described by the volume fraction of ceramic and the mechanical
quality factor Q (the ratio of the reactance to the resistance in the series equiv-
alent circuit representing the piezoelectric transducer). Beamforming is a signal
processing technique used with arrays of transmitting or receiving transducers
5
that controls the directionality of, or sensitivity to, a radiation pattern. Elastic
loss (mechanical energy lost in the medium due to heat, friction and deforma-
tion) must be taken into account when modelling these devices in order that
results can be compared to experimental investigations. There are numerous
processing techniques for fabrication of piezoelectric composite transducers such
as dice and fill, injection moulding and lost mold techniques [?]. The dice and
fill method involves performing a series of parallel cuts into a piezoelectric plate,
filling these cuts with an epoxy and slicing the base of the device to reveal a
composite transducer. Once the transducer design is complete, the device must
be electroded with silver paint on the main faces, poled and characterised by
measuring techniques.
As the frequency is increased, the element’s oscillations approach a frequency
at which the impedance is a minimum (maximum admittance). This minimum
impedance frequency approximates the series resonance frequency, the frequency
at which impedance in an electrical circuit describing the element is zero, if re-
sistance caused by mechanical losses is ignored. This is the electrical resonant
frequency (fe ), the frequency at which the ceramic most effectively converts
the electrical energy into mechanical energy and vibrates most readily. As the
frequency is further increased, the impedance increases to a maximum (mini-
mum admittance). The maximum impedance frequency, fm , approximates the
parallel resonance frequency, the frequency at which parallel resistance in the
equivalent electrical circuit is infinite if resistance caused by mechanical losses
is ignored. This is the mechanical resonant frequency (fm ), the frequency at
which the ceramic most effectively converts the mechanical energy into electri-
cal energy.
The composition of the ceramic material and the shape and volume of the
piezoelectric pillars determine the electrical resonant frequency. Generally, a
thicker transducer has a lower fe than a thin transducer.
6
Top electrodes
Piezoelectric Ceramic
of the passive phase were varied and the effect on these dispersion curves dis-
cussed. For the finite thickness plate they found that if the thickness resonant
frequency is lower than the lateral mode, then there will be a frequency near the
ceramic thickness mode where both constituents vibrate in phase. Their analy-
sis also predicted the modes which occur due to the periodicity of the structure.
They also studied the role that the pillar aspect ratio has on the surface profile.
One deficiency in their model is that no loss mechanisms in the materials were
incorporated into the finite thickness case.
Certon et al. [13] studied the lateral modes using an infinitesimally thin
(membrane model) 1-3 composite with no piezoelectric effect. Again the dy-
namical equations were constructed in each material and a set of periodic in-
terface conditions imposed. This does simplify the computations but restricts
the model outcomes to stop band gaps in the transverse modes and, by its very
nature, does not permit variations in material parameters in the thickness mode
direction. It was found that a large ceramic width to pitch ratio (ratio of the
pillar width and period) resulted in the largest frequency band gaps. The mem-
brane model was also studied using Bloch wave theory and a truncated Fourier
series to describe the dependent variables [12]. This led to slightly longer com-
putational times but the need for interface conditions was avoided. Again no
loss mechanisms were invoked but one of the benefits of this approach is that
more irregular geometries could be studied.
Geng and Zhang [22] used an ingenious annular unit cell to study a three di-
mensional piezoelectric transducer with a hexagonal symmetry pattern. Within
each material a partial wave expansion solution of the governing dynamical
equations was derived and interface conditions imposed. A cylindrical coor-
dinate system reduced the dimensionality of the problem by one. Mechanical
and dielectric losses were included in both the ceramic and passive phases, and
piezoelectric loss was included in the ceramic. This permitted a study of the
10
mechanical Q value, that is the ratio of the mechanical energy stored to the me-
chanical energy lost in one cycle. They found that the Q value depended on the
two material properties in a non-trivial fashion and that it is not a simple matter
of interpolating between two sets of values. The predicted lateral modes were
identified from the resonant frequencies associated with the kerf widths and the
diagonal lengths in the passive phase. However, the model has a very restric-
tive geometry and the annular unit cell and hexagonal periodic arrangement is
unrealistic.
2.1 Introduction
In this chapter a one-dimensional model of a piezoelectric transducer is inves-
tigated. This consists of a plane parallel plate of piezoelectric material, with a
backing material and a front matching layer. A 1-3 composite transducer with a
polymer filler material will also be considered. Polymer composite transducers
combine two or more materials to gain better characteristics than those of a
monolithic piezoelectric crystal. The thickness mode of the device; a piston like
oscillation, is the predominant dynamical behaviour of such devices [70]. The
LSM model is extended here to show the impact of varying the volume fraction
of the ceramic. In later chapters results will be compared to an LSM model
incorporating elastic loss and a plane wave expansion method.
13
14
a Linear Systems Model (LSM) can be derived [25]. In a series of papers, the
dependency of both the reception and transmission characteristics of the trans-
ducer on its physical parameters was investigated using a systems block diagram
approach [31, 26, 27]. Previous authors have used this approach to study some
special cases such as, the open-circuit response of a lossless transducer, with a
rigid backing material [59], the short or open-circuit dynamics of a mechanically
free transducer [69] or the form of the transmitted pressure wave when a step-like
charge is applied [20]. In this section the derivation of the equations describing
the transmission and reception of the thickness mode transducer is detailed.
The two unknowns are the mechanical displacement u(x, t) and the electrical
displacement E(x, t). The one-dimensional wave equation for u(x, t) is
∂ 2 u(x, t) ∂ 2 u(x, t)
ρ = Y (2.1)
∂t2 ∂x2
where ρ is the density and u is the particle displacement, subject to the boundary
conditions at x = 0 and x = L of continuity of displacement and force into the
adjacent media. From Gauss’s Law
∂D/∂x = 0, (2.2)
T = Y S − hD (2.3)
D
E = −hS + (2.4)
where T is the stress, Y is the Young’s modulus, S is the strain, h is the piezo-
electric constant, D is the electrical displacement, E is the electric field and is
the permittivity. The strain is defined as
∂u
S= , (2.5)
∂x
15
where E is the electric field and L is the thickness of the transducer. The
force at each face of the transducer is F , where F = Ar T and Ar is the cross-
sectional area of the transducer. The transducer typically has a backing material
(subscript 2) and a matching layer, but for simplicity, there is no matching layer
here; the device will simply transmit into a load medium (subscript 1) at x = 0
(see Figure 2.1). At the two interfaces there is continuity and differentiability of
the displacement u; the latter of these corresponding to the continuity of force.
Applying these boundary conditions implies that u(0) = u1 (0), u(L) = u2 (L),
F (0) = F1 (0) and F (L) = F2 (L) where
F = (Y S − hD)Ar . (2.7)
A2 A A1
PSfrag replacements
B B1
x=h
x=0
Figure 2.1: Illustration of the transmitted and received waves within a trans-
ducer.
where the wave speed v is given by v 2 = Y /ρ. Solving equation (2.8) inside the
transducer gives,
p p
ū(x, p) = Ae− v x + Be v x . (2.9)
Zc = ρvAr , (2.10)
∂ ū Zc ∂ ū x x
Y S̄Ar = Y = Zc v = pZc (−Ae−p( v ) + Bep( v ) ). (2.11)
∂x ρv ∂x
x x
F̄ + hD̄Ar = pZc (−Ae−p( v ) + Bep( v ) ).
That is
Q̄L
V̄ = −h A(e−pξ − 1) + B(epξ − 1) +
, (2.13)
Ar
where ξ = L/v is the transit time of a plane wave through the transducer. The
transducer is placed in parallel with a load impedance Z̄E and the combination
17
PSfrag replacements
Z0
I
V
ZE ZT
Vs IE IT
is placed in series with a load Z̄0 as shown in Figure 2.2. If the input voltage,
V̄s is put into the transducer and the total impedance is Z̄0 + Z̄E Z̄T /(Z̄E + Z̄T ),
then
V̄s
I¯ = Z̄E Z̄T
, (2.14)
Z̄0 + Z̄E +Z̄T
where I is the current and ZT is the electrical impedance of the transducer. The
voltage across the transducer is defined as
V̄s Z̄E
=
(Z̄0 + Z̄E )Z̄T + Z̄0 Z̄E
where ā = Z̄E /(Z̄0 + Z̄E ) and b̄ = Z̄0 Z̄E /(Z̄0 + Z̄E ). Now since I¯T = V̄s /Z̄0 − V̄ /b̄,
the electrical charge Z
Q= IT dt (2.17)
t
18
can be written as
I¯T V̄s V̄
Q̄ = = − . (2.18)
p pZ̄0 pb̄
Ar
Since C0 = L
, where C0 is the (clamped) capacitance of the transducer, equa-
tion (2.13) becomes
V̄s V̄
V̄ = −h A(e−pξ − 1) + B(epξ − 1) +
− ,
pC0 Z̄0 pC0 b̄
which can be written as
V̄s
V̄ = (−h A(e−pξ − 1) + B(epξ − 1) +
)Ū , (2.19)
pC0 Z̄0
where Ū = pC0 b̄/(1 + pC0 b̄). Within each medium, there is a transmitted wave
to the right (amplitude Bi ) and an incoming wave to the left (amplitude Ai )
and it is assumed that the reflected wave within the backing layer is damped
out (B2 = 0) (see Figure 2.1). Applying the boundary conditions for continuity
of displacement implies that ū1 (0) = ū(0) which gives
A1 + B1 = A + B, (2.20)
−p vL
Ae−pξ + Bepξ = A2 e 2 . (2.21)
and
−p vL
pZc (−Ae−pξ + Bepξ ) − hQ̄ = pZ2 (−A2 e 2 ), (2.23)
where Z1 is the mechanical impedance of the front load and Z2 of the backing
material. Hence there are four equations and five unknowns (A1 , B1 , A, B, A2 ).
Substituting equation (2.20) in equation (2.22) gives
hQ̄
A(Zc + Z1 ) − B(Zc − Z1 ) = 2A1 Z1 − , (2.25)
p
and then
Zc − Z 1 Zc + Z 1 + Z 1 − Z c hQ̄
A−B = A1 − , (2.26)
Zc + Z 1 Zc + Z 1 (Zc + Z1 )p
so that
hQ̄
A − RF B = A1 (1 − RF ) − , (2.27)
(Zc + Z1 )p
where RF = (Zc − Z1 )/(Zc + Z1 ) is the reflection coefficient at the front face of
the transducer. Multiplying equation (2.21) by pZ2 , and adding it to equation
(2.23) gives
hQ̄
Bepξ (Zc + Z2 ) − Ae−pξ (Zc − Z2 ) = , (2.29)
p
so that
pξ hQ̄ Zc − Z 2
Be = + Ae−pξ . (2.30)
(Zc + Z2 )p Zc + Z 2
Hence B can be expressed as
hQ̄e−pξ
B= + Ae−2pξ RB , (2.31)
(Zc + Z2 )p
RF hQ̄e−pξ hQ̄
A − Ae−2pξ RF RB = + A1 (1 − RF ) − , (2.32)
(Zc + Z2 )p (Zc + Z1 )p
and therefore
h(1 − e−pξ ) −pξ hQ̄(1 − RB e−pξ )
V̄ = A 1 (1 − R F )(1 − R B e ) −
1 − RF RB e−2pξ (Zc + Z1 )p
hQ̄(1 − RF e−pξ ) V̄s
− + Ū , (2.38)
(Zc + Z2 )p pC0 Z0 h
so that
hQ̄ K̄B hQ̄ V̄s
V̄ = h K̄F Ā1 (1 − RF ) − − + Ū , (2.39)
p(Zc + Z1 ) p(Zc + Z2 ) pC0 Z0
where K̄F = ((1−e−pξ )(1−RB e−pξ ))/(1−RF RB e−2pξ ) and K̄B = ((1−e−pξ )(1−
RF e−pξ ))/(1 − RF RB e−2pξ ).
When the transducer is transmitting there is no force incident on the front face
of the transducer from the load medium and so A1 = 0. Hence
∂u
F̄F = pZc (0) − hQ̄,
∂x
= pZc (−A + B) − hQ̄. (2.40)
21
hQ̄Z̄c 2Z̄1 Z̄c e−pξ Zc + Zc RB e−2pξ
= +
1 − RF RB e−2pξ (Zc + Z2 )(Zc + Z1 )Zc (Zc + Z1 )Zc
Zc + Z1 − (Zc − Z1 )RB e−2pξ
− ,
(Zc + Z1 )Zc
hQ̄K̄F Z1
= − .
Zc + Z 1
(2.41)
∂u
F̄B = pZc (L) − hQ̄,
∂x
= pZc (−Ae−pT + BepT ) − hQ̄, (2.42)
22
hQ̄Z̄c Z̄c − Z̄c RF e−2pξ 2Z̄c e−pξ
= +
1 − RF RB e−2pξ (Zc + Z2 )Zc (Zc + Z2 )(Zc + Z1 )Zc
Zc + Z2 − (ZC − Z2 )RF e−2pξ
−
(Zc + Z2 )Zc
hQ̄Z̄2
= (1 + RF )e−pξ − 1 − RF e−2pξ ,
(1 − RF RB e −2pξ )(Zc + Z2 )
hQ̄K̄B Z2
= − .
Zc + Z 2
(2.43)
Since A1 = 0,
h(1 − e−pξ ) hQ̄RF e−pξ hQ̄
V̄ = −
1 − RF RB e−2pξ (Zc + Z2 )p (Zc + Z1 )p
pξ hQ̄RF e−pξ hQ̄RB e−2pξ Q̄
− e − + ,
(Zc + Z2 )p (Zc + Z1 )p C0
−h(1 − e−pξ ) hQ̄(1 − RB e−pξ ) hQ̄(1 − RF e−pξ ) Q̄
= + + .
1 − RF RB e−2pξ (Zc + Z1 )p (Zc + Z2 )p C0
(2.44)
Hence the voltage response of the transducer given by equation (2.39) can be
expressed as
K̄F hQ̄ K̄B hQ̄ Q̄
V̄ = −h + + ,
p(Zc + Z1 ) p(Zc + Z2 ) Co
Q̄ 2 (K̄F TF + K̄B TB )
= 1 − h Co ,
Co 2pZc
(2.45)
23
2Zc 2Zc
where TF = Zc +Z1
and TB = Zc +Z2
.
The electrical impedance of the device ZT , defined as Z̄T = V̄ /I¯T , provides
useful information on its operating characteristics. The electrical impedance can
be obtained by substituting equation (2.18) into equation (2.45) to get
1 2 (K̄F TF + K̄B TB )
Z̄T = 1 − h Co , (2.46)
pCo 2pZc
where p = iω and ω = 2πf . A dimensional analysis of equation (2.46) shows that
h2 C0 /pZc , defined as the square of the electromechanical coupling coefficient k̄t ,
is dimensionless [25]. Since K̄F , K̄B , TF and TB are O(1) then it is required that
k̄t is also O(1) so that the two additive terms in equation (2.46) are of similar
order and resonant behaviour can then occur. In transmitting mode a voltage
V̄s is put into the transducer to produce a force at the front face (F̄F ). Equation
(2.16) can be substituted into equation (2.41) along with Q̄ = I¯T /p to obtain
F̄F hāAF K̄F
=− (2.47)
V̄s 2p(Z̄T + b̄)
where AF = 2Z1 /(Zc + Z1 ). To maximize F̄F it is best that Z̄T is as small as
possible and this occurs at the electrical resonant frequency (fe ). The general
transfer function relating the stress wave generated into the load medium to
the input voltage can be obtained by substituting equation (2.46) into equation
(2.47) to get
F̄F hāĀF K̄F
= − ,
V̄s 2p((1/pC0 ) (1 − h2 C 0 (K̄F TF + K̄B TB )/2pZc ) + b̄)
hā(ĀF /2)K̄F
= − (2.48)
(1/C0 )(1 + C0 pb̄ − h2 C0 (K̄F TF + K̄B TB )/2pZc)
Equation (2.48) is then rearranged to give the transmission sensitivity;
F̄F −1
= −hā(AF /2)Ȳ K̄F 1 − h2 Ȳ (K̄F TF + K̄B TB )/2pZc
(2.49)
V̄s
where Ȳ = C0 /(1 + pC0 b̄). If the transducer was in vacuum with no backing or
matching layer, true resonance would occur. In this model energy is lost since the
24
wave transmitted into the backing layer is not reflected back to the piezoelectric
layer, therefore the amplitude of the transmission sensitivity is finite (this also
applies to the reception sensitivity). The aim is to have the transducer perform
efficiently over a range of frequencies. This range of frequency can be quantified
by the bandwidth. For a unimodal function A(ω), with a local maximum, Amax ,
at ωmax and A(ω) = Amax /2 at ωL and ωR , the bandwidth is defined as ωR − ωL .
The percentage bandwidth is then given by (ωR − ωL )/ωmax × 100. The band-
width can also be defined in terms of decibels (dB). Since decibels are defined
as the logarithm of a ratio of power, and since power is proportional to voltage
squared, then a voltage change from V1 to V2 is calculated as 20 log10 (V2 /V1 )
dB. In the bandwidth calculation V2 = Vmax ,V1 = 21 Vmax and so the equivalent
change in decibels is 20 log10 1VVmax
max
= 20 log10 2 ≈ 6 dB.
2
When in response mode the aim is to maximize the voltage Vmax resulting from a
force at the front face (F̄F ), and this occurs at the mechanical resonant frequency
fm .
In Figure 2.3 the reception sensitivity of the device, given by equation (2.53),
is plotted as a function of the driving frequency, with reflection and transmis-
sion coefficients RF = 0.65, RB = 0.52, TF = 1.65 and TB = 1.52. The backing
material is rubber and the front material is water. Looking at Figure 2.3 the
first peak has a maximum reception sensitivity at 11.3 MHz with a 6dB per-
26
V̄
F̄F
(Zc /(h33 Co b))
1
0.75
0.5
0.25
PSfrag replacements
f
1 2 3 4
ZT
20
15
10
5
PSfrag replacements
f
1 2 3 4
Figure 2.4: Electrical impedance ZT (kΩ) against frequency f (Hertz) ×107 for
a piezoelectric ceramic transducer.
centage bandwidth of 14%. Figure 2.4 shows a graph of equation (2.46) for the
same transducer. The location of the first minimum in this plot is the electrical
resonant frequency fe and the location of the first maximum is the mechanical
resonant frequency fm . For a transducer to be most effective it will transmit
at the electrical resonant frequency and receive at the mechanical resonant fre-
quency. In this case the mechanical resonant frequency is fm = 11.4 MHz with
27
F̄F
V̄
/(h33 Co )
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
PSfrag replacements 0.1
f
1 2 3 4
Figure 2.6: Illustration of a 1-3 composite transducer where the ceramic is black
and the polymer is white.
where Ti is the stress tensor, Si is the strain tensor and cij is the elastic modulus
tensor [11]. For a cubic crystal polymer the elastic modulus tensor is
c11 c12 c12 0 0 0
c12 c11 c12 0 0 0
p
c12 c12 c11 0 0 0
cij =
0 0 0 c 44 0 0
0 0 0 0 c44 0
0 0 0 0 0 c44
and for a tetragonal ceramic
cc11 cc12 cc13 0
0 0
cc12 cc11 cc13 0 0 0
c
cc13 cc13 cc33 0 0 0
cij = c
.
0 0 0 c44 0 0
0 0 0 0 cc44 0
0 0 0 0 0 cc66
From Beyer and Letcher [11]
where Di is the electric displacement, eij = him mj are the piezoelectric stress
coefficients, ij is the permittivity and Ej is the electric field. In an isotropic,
passive polymer epij = 0 and
11 0 0
pij = 0 11 0 ,
0 0 11
where 11 is the isotropic permittivity of the polymer. In a typical ceramic such
as PZT (lead zirconate titanate) [11]
0 0 0 0 e15 0
ecij = 0 0 0 e15 0 0 ,
e31 e31 e33 0 0 0
and
c11 0 0
cij = 0 c11 0
0 0 c33
since the ceramic is poled in the direction of the pillars. So the piezoelectric
equations for the polymer phase are
(2.56)
and
Dic = ecij Sjc + cij Ejc . (2.58)
1. The electric field and the strain are assumed to be functions of z only,
where z is directed along the pillar length (the vertical direction in Figure
2.6).
3. The ceramic and polymer move together in the z direction so that S3p =
S3c = S̄3 .
4. The electric field is the same in both phases, hence E3p = E3c = Ē3 .
5. Lateral stresses are equal in both phases so that T1p = T1c = T̄1 . In order
that the composite as a whole is laterally clamped (since the composite
is normally placed in a rigid container that prevents any lateral motion
at its extremities) it is assumed that the lateral strain in the ceramic is
compensated by a complementary strain in the polymer to give
1
S1p = (cc11 + cc12 )S1c + (cc13 − c12 )S̄3 − e31 Ē3 .
(2.66)
(c11 + c12 )
where ψ̃ = 1 − ψ and
where
ψcc13 (c11 + c12 ) + ψ̃c12 (cc11 + cc12 )
c̄13 = , (2.70)
ψ(c11 + c12 ) + ψ̃(cc11 + cc12 )
and
ψe31 (c11 + c12 )
ē31 = . (2.71)
ψ(c11 + c12 ) + ψ̃(cc11 + cc12 )
In a similar way equations (2.67) and (2.68) can be substituted into the
expressions for T3p , T3c and D3c .
6. If the lateral periodicity is sufficiently fine then the effective total stress
T̄3 and electric displacement D3 are given by volume averaging
and
D̄3 = ψD3c + ψ̃D3p . (2.73)
and
D̄3 = ē33 S̄3 + ¯33 Ē3 (2.75)
where
!
2ψ̃(cc13 − c12 )2
c̄33 = ψ cc33 − + ψ̃c11 , (2.76)
ψ(c11 + c12 ) + ψ̃(cc11 + cc12 )
!
2ψ̃e31 (cc13 − c12 )
ē33 = ψ e33 − , (2.77)
ψ(c11 + c12 ) + ψ̃(cc11 + cc12 )
and
!
2ψ̃(e31 )2
¯33 = ψ c33 + + ψ̃11 . (2.78)
ψ(c11 + c12 ) + ψ̃(cc11 + cc12 )
T̄3 = c̄D
33 S̄3 − h33 D̄3 (2.79)
where cD 2
33 = c̄33 + (ē33 ) /¯
33 , h33 = ē33 /¯
33 and β33 = 1/¯
33 . The density is
defined
ρ̄ = ψρc + ψ̃ρp (2.81)
where ρc is the density of the ceramic and ρp is the density of the polymer.
For the case when the polymer phase is anisotropic (transversely isotropic) the
expressions for the effective properties must be altered slightly from those in
Equations (2.76), (2.77) and (2.78) to
c̄33 = ψ(cc33 − 2(1 − ψ)(cc13 − c13 )2 /(ψ(c11 + c12 ) + (1 − ψ)(cc11 + cc12 ))) + (1 − ψ)c11 ,
(2.82)
ē33 = ψ(e33 − 2(1 − ψ)e31 (cc13 − c13 )/(ψ(c11 + c12 ) + (1 − ψ)(cc11 + cc12 ))), (2.83)
33
and
¯33 = ψ(c33 + 2(1 − ψ)e231 /(ψ(c11 + c12 ) + (1 − ψ)(cc11 + cc12 ))) + (1 − ψ). (2.84)
A measure of the efficiency with which the transducer converts electrical energy
to mechanical energy is given by the electromechanical coupling coefficient k̄t .
Rewriting the nondimensional term discussed with regard to equation (2.46)
p
(Co = Ar ¯33 /L, p = 1/ξ = v/L, v = cD
33 /ρ̄ ) an expression is obtained for the
h̄33 ē33
k̄t = p =p . (2.85)
cD33 β 33 c D
33
¯ 33
This value can be compared with the thickness electromechanical coupling con-
stant for a freely vibrating piezoelectric ceramic rod given by
dc33
k33 = √ (2.86)
εc33 sc33
where scij = (ccij )−1 is the elastic compliance constant, dcij = scij ecij and εcij =
ecij scij ecji + cij [1]. The specific acoustic impedance Z̄c (equation (2.10)) is now
given by
q
Z̄c = cD
33 ρ̄ (2.87)
Zc
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
PSfrag replacements 0.5
ψ
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
(2.87) is shown in Figure 2.7, where the polymer filler is the hardset material
HY1300/CY1301 [48] and the piezoelectric ceramic is the same as in the previous
section.
k̄t
0.6
0.5
0.4
PSfrag replacements
ψ
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
1500
1250
1000
750
500
PSfrag replacements 250
ψ
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Figure 2.9: Dielectric constant ¯/0 against ceramic volume fraction ψ for a 1-3
composite transducer.
V̄
F̄F
(Zc /(h33 Co b))
1
0.75
0.5
0.25
PSfrag replacements
f
1 2 3 4
ZT
20
15
10
5
PSfrag replacements
f
1 2 3 4
Figure 2.11: Impedance ZT (kΩ) against frequency f (Hertz) ×107 for a piezo-
electric ceramic transducer (dashed line) and a 1-3 composite transducer (full
line).
Figure 2.10 shows the reception sensitivity against frequency for a monolithic
transducer and a 1-3 composite transducer with the hardset material as the
passive phase and ceramic volume fraction ψ = 0.7. Comparison of the peaks
show that the 1-3 composite will resonate around 2 MHz lower than the mono-
lithic transducer and that the peak amplitudes have increased by around 15%.
37
F̄F
V¯s
/(h33 Co )
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
PSfrag replacements
0.1
f
1 2 3 4
0
0.25
0.5 ψ
0.75
1
PSfrag replacements
The inclusion of a polymer phase within the transducer will give a reduction in
velocity which denotes an increase in impedance. This also indicates that the
transit time ξ has increased, hence the transducer will resonate at a lower fre-
quency since ω = 2πf = 1/ξ. In addition, the percentage bandwidth has nearly
doubled to 24%. In Figure 2.11 the electrical impedance of each device is plot-
38
0
0.25
ψ 0.5
0.75
1
PSfrag replacements ZT
1 2 3 4
f
Figure 2.14: Electrical impedance log ZT (kΩ) against frequency f (Hertz) ×107
and volume fraction ψ for a 1-3 composite transducer.
kt
0.5
0.45
0.4
0.35
PSfrag replacements
ψ
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
ted. For the 1-3 composite, the mechanical resonant frequency is fm = 9.8 MHz
with an electrical impedance of 12.2 kΩ and the electrical resonant frequency is
fe = 7.2 MHz with associated electrical impedance of 1.3 kΩ. It is clear that by
using a 1-3 composite transducer the thickness mode response has significantly
improved.
Looking at Figure 2.12, which shows the graph of the transmission sensitivity
39
against frequency, it can be seen that the 1-3 composite has a maximum peak
at fm = 7.3 MHz with a percentage bandwidth of 33%. By comparing this
bandwidth to the monolithic plate, it is found that there is a twofold increase in
the transmission sensitivity bandwidth. Figure 2.13 shows the variation in the
reception sensitivity profile as the volume fraction of the ceramic (ψ) is varied
and Figure 2.14 shows the variation in the electrical impedance profile as ψ is
varied. As the ceramic volume fraction decreases the mechanical impedance
decreases, hence the wave velocities decrease along with the associated resonant
frequencies. It can also be seen that as the polymer phase is slowly introduced
to the pure ceramic (ψ = 1) the magnitude of the reception sensitivity decreases
and the resonant frequencies increase. In the electrical impedance frequency
profile, it can be seen that an ideal profile (low amplitude at the electrical
resonant frequency, high value at the mechanical resonant frequency) is achieved
at an intermediate ceramic volume fraction. As the volume fraction diminishes
the resonant behaviour vanishes and the device acts like a simple capacitor.
Figure 2.15 illustrates how the impedance graph (Figure 2.14) can also be
used to define an alternative electromechanical coupling coefficient using the
expression [1] v
π fe
u
u
2 fm
kt = t . (2.89)
u
π fe
tan 2 fm
Comparing the results to Figure 2.8 both curves are of similar shape and mag-
nitude. However k̄t is generally of larger magnitude with a long plateau at
intermediate values of the ceramic volume factor and a less well pronounced
maximum.
40
2.4 Conclusions
A linear systems model has been derived and used to model a PZT5H ceramic
transducer. The methods of Smith and Auld (1991) were then introduced to
develop a model for a 1-3 transducer with polymer filler HY1300/CY1301. Re-
ception sensitivity, transmission sensitivity and impedance curves were produced
to compare a piezoelectric plate transducer and a 1-3 composite transducer. The
composite transducer was found to have better operational characteristics than
the piezoelectric plate. Importantly the derivation and subsequent use of the
linear systems model does not incorporate any loss mechanisms. The model will
therefore be extended in the next chapter to include elastic losses.
Chapter 3
3.1 Introduction
In this chapter the LSM model will be developed to include elastic losses. The
method is extended here to include expressions for frequency dependent mechan-
ical loss, and a comparison of the reception/transmission sensitivity profiles for a
transducer with and without loss is made. The effective properties of a composite
transducer with an anisotropic polymer phase are investigated and a comparison
to a finite element model (FEM), using a range of polymer composites conducted.
A disadvantage of composite transducers is that there is crosstalk between the
active ceramic pillars which reduces the electromechanical coupling efficiency
[29]. To address this disadvantage the use of an anisotropic polymer filler is in-
vestigated here. Obviously a one-dimensional model such as the linear systems
model cannot predict these lateral modes. This investigation will be done in
Chapter 5 using the three dimensional plane wave expansion (PWE) method.
However, it will prove useful to compare the output from the LSM with the PWE
and FEM. The range of polymer fillers that will be compared are a standard
41
42
3.2 Loss
Smith and Auld [67] do not explicitly have loss within their effective medium
model but in any real transducer there will always be wave attenuation. Elastic
damping depends on the temperature, frequency of vibration and the physi-
cal properties of the materials. Acoustic losses can be described by a viscous
damping term [7] and in this section it is shown how mechanical losses can be
introduced into the formulation. The mechanical loss for the shear modulus G
is calculated using the relaxation equation [40]
G = G0 + iG00 (3.1)
where
(Gu − Gr )ω 2 τ 2
G0 = G r + , (3.2)
1 + ω2τ 2
(Gu − Gr )ωτ
G00 = , (3.3)
1 + ω2τ 2
= 0 − i00 (3.4)
43
where
(r − u )ω 2 τE2
0 = u + ,
1 + ω 2 τE2
(r − u )ωτE
00 = ,
1 + ω 2 τE2
However
ω ω ω/k 0 c
vs = = = = , (3.8)
k k − iα
0 1 − iα/k 0 1 − iα/k 0
where c is the measured shear wave velocity and the imaginary part of the
wavenumber k is the attenuation coefficient. Combining equations (3.7) and
(3.8) with equation (3.6) gives
s
G0 c
(1 + i tan δ) = , (3.9)
ρ 1 − iα/k 0
p
which, by using c = G0 /ρ, can be rearranged to give
1
c(1 + i tan δ) 2 = c(1 − iαc/ω)−1 . (3.10)
44
2
Gr + Gu ωmax τ 2 − 2Gu ωmax
2
τ 2 = 0, (3.13)
Substituting equations (3.2) and (3.3) into equations (3.5) and (3.11) yields the
expression
(Gu − Gr )ωI τ 2cα
2 2
= , (3.15)
G r + G u ωI τ ωI
so that
Gu (ωI2 τ − 2cαωI2 τ 2 ) = Gr (2cα + ωI2 τ ), (3.16)
Gr ω 2 τ (1 − 2cατ )
= I . (3.17)
Gu 2cα + ωI2 τ
2 ωI2 τ (1 − 2cατ )
ωmax τ2 = (3.18)
2cα + ωI2 τ
45
ωI2 ωmax
2
τ 2 + 2cα(ωI2 + ωmax
2
)τ − ωI2 = 0. (3.19)
which simplifies to
The attenuation coefficient is often given in dB/m and equation (3.5) requires a
value in Nepers/m. A straightforward conversion factor can be derived however.
Consider the decay in the spatial component of a voltage, expressed in terms of
an attenuation coefficient via V (x) = V0 e−αx . This can be rearranged for α to
give, α = 1/x ln(Vo /V ) Nepers/m. Alternatively logarithms to base 10 can be
taken to give α = 1/(x log10 (e)) log10 (V0 /V ). To state this in decibels per metre
a multiplication of 20 log10 (e) ≈ 8.686 is then needed [7]. The calculated values
46
for the materials in this Chapter are presented in Table 3.1. Due to to the lack
of information on ωmax for these materials in the available literature estimates
were used. A sensitivity analysis was then performed to gauge the effect that
this approach had on the parameters Gu , Gr and τ . This concluded that the
effects were minimal and that these estimates were reasonable. Equations (3.20),
(3.24) and (3.25) use the data in Table 3.1 to calculate a frequency dependent
shear modulus via equation (3.1) (that is, the Lamé coefficient c44 ) [10]. Similar
equations are used for the Young’s modulus (the Lamé coefficient c12 ). Note that
if the imaginary part of c12 turns out to be small and negative, it is set equal to
zero. Also note that it is assumed that the ceramic has frequency independent
viscoelastic losses of the form c11 = c11 (1 + i tan δ).
V̄
F̄F
(Zc /(h33 Co b))
1
0.75
0.5
0.25
PSfrag replacements
f
1 2 3 4
ZT
20
15
10
5
PSfrag replacements
f
1 2 3 4
0.6
0.4
0.2
PSfrag replacements
f
1 2 3 4
model can be seen by comparing the no loss case (dashed line) with the loss case
(full line). The addition of the elastic loss does not affect the profile except at
the main peaks where they are reduced by around 5 per cent. This reduction in
amplitude gives rise to a slight increase in the percentage bandwidth from 24%
48
k̄t
0.6
0.5
0.4
PSfrag replacements
ψ
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
kt
0.5
0.45
0.4
PSfrag replacements
0.35
ψ
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
to 25% MHz. Figure 3.2 shows that the electrical impedance has a mechanical
resonant frequency of fm = 9.7 MHz and an electrical resonant frequency of
fe = 7.3 MHz. It can be seen that introducing loss for these materials has
had very little effect on the profile except at the mechanical resonant frequency.
49
0
0.25
0.5 ψ
0.75
1
PSfrag replacements
0.75
1
PSfrag replacements ZT
1 2 3 4
f
Figure 3.7: Electrical impedance log ZT (kΩ) against frequency f (Hertz) ×107
and volume fraction ψ for a 1-3 composite transducer with the hardset material
HY1300/CY1301 with frequency dependent, viscoelastic loss.
is plotted. Again the addition of the viscoelastic loss does not affect the profile
except at the main peaks where they are slightly reduced and the percentage
bandwidth increases by 1% to 34%.
In Figure 3.4 the electromechanical coupling coefficient, given by equation
(2.85), is plotted as a function of the volume fraction of the ceramic phase. It can
be seen that the frequency dependent loss reduces the efficiency across the full
range of volume fractions. From a design perspective the highest efficiency (of
around k̄t = 0.65) occurs at a ceramic volume fraction of around ψ = 0.6. The
diagram also highlights the benefits of using a composite design. The coefficient
has risen by around 30 per cent from k̄t = 0.5 for the pure ceramic (ψ = 1) to
the optimum ceramic volume fraction of around ψ = 0.6. The low permittivity
value in the polymer phase ensures that the piezoelectric constant h33 has a high
value for even low volume fractions of ceramic. This in turn leads to a reasonably
high electromechanical coupling coefficient at low ceramic volume fractions. This
results in the reception and transmission characteristics of the device being near
optimal across a wide range of ceramic volume fractions. Figure 3.5 shows the
electromechanical coupling coefficient calculated using equation (2.89) and the
impedance data in Figure 3.7. Comparing this to the no loss case in Figure 2.15
shows that both curves are very similar.
In Figure 3.6 the nondimensionalised reception sensitivity frequency profile
is plotted against the ceramic volume fraction. As the ceramic volume fraction
decreases the resonant frequencies decrease. Since the mechanical impedance
decreases as the volume fraction of the polymer increases, then the wave ve-
locities decrease along with the associated resonant frequencies. It can also be
seen that the magnitude of the reception sensitivity decreases as the polymer
phase is slowly introduced to the pure ceramic (ψ = 1). This behaviour is main-
tained over a wide range of ceramic volume fractions since the low permittivity
in the polymer keeps the piezoelectric constant at a reasonable level (and the
51
3.3 SBS
In this section the transmission and response characteristics of a 1-3 composite
transducer, with a passive phase consisting of a styrene-butadiene-styrene (SBS)
polymer are investigated. The effective elastic and dielectric properties of the
SBS are derived here. In a series of papers Pethrick and co-workers have studied
the mechanical response of this material to ultrasonic stimulus [5, 4]. They
studied the effects of the volume fraction of styrene and the temperature on
the longitudinal wave speed and loss tangent at a fixed frequency [16]. Scanning
electron microscope images clearly showed the anisotropic nature of the material.
In the direction parallel to the extrusion process the material is striated whereas,
perpendicular to this, the material resembles styrene columns randomly set in
a polybutadiene matrix [56]. Velocity measurements were only presented for
longitudinal propagation on compression moulded samples as the experimental
equipment did not have a large enough angular aperture to cope with the critical
angle for shear wave propagation. This work was extended to examine the
frequency dependence of the attenuation [5] and looked at how phase separation
affects the viscoelastic properties of the composite [4]. In this section a linear
systems model of the SBS 1-3 composite transducer is constructed using the
analysis of the previous sections. The mechanical loss for the Young’s (Y ) and
shear (G) moduli are calculated independently for both the polystyrene and
52
Note that if there is only experimental data for the shear and Young’s moduli
then
G(2G − Y )
c12 = (3.29)
Y − 3G
can be used to calculate the bulk modulus [11]. The effective dielectric constant
is [72]
p (2p + b + 2φ(b − p ))
e = . (3.30)
2p + b − φ(b − p )
53
V̄
F̄F
(Zc /(h33 Co b))
1
0.75
0.5
f
1 2 3 4
ZT
20
15
10
PSfrag replacements 5
f
1 2 3 4
F̄F
V¯s
/(h33 Co )
0.6
0.4
f
1 2 3 4
The composite model detailed in Section 2.3 is then used to calculate the
effective properties of the 1-3 transducer for use in the linear systems model.
Figure 3.8 shows the reception sensitivity against frequency of the SBS 1-3 com-
posite transducer and Figure 3.9 shows its electrical impedance.
0
0.25
0.5 ψ
0.75
PSfrag replacements 1
0
0.25
ψ 0.5
0.75
PSfrag replacements 4
1
3
ZT 2
1
0
2 4 6
f
Figure 3.12: Absolute value of the Electrical impedance log ZT (kΩ) against
frequency f (Hertz) ×107 and volume fraction ψ for an SBS 1-3 composite
transducer.
Zc
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
PSfrag replacements 1
0.5
ψ
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
kt
0.72
0.7 ψ
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
0.68
0.66
PSfrag replacements 0.64
0.62
0.6
The volume fraction of ceramic in Figures 3.8 and 3.9 is the same as that
used in Figures 2.10 and 2.11. The volume fraction (φ) of the polybutadiene
in all the SBS Figures is 0.69. In Figure 3.8 the nondimensionalised reception
sensitivity profile for such a device is shown. Due to the high attenuation in
this polymer there is a marked reduction in amplitude when the loss is included.
Figure 3.9 shows that the electrical impedance has a mechanical resonant fre-
quency of fm = 9.1 MHz, and an electrical resonant frequency of fe = 6.5
MHz. The nondimensionalised transmission sensitivity frequency response in
Figure 3.9 shows a minor decrease in amplitude and a frequency shift. At this
volume fraction of polybutadiene (φ = 0.7) the material has lower values for its
moduli than the hardset material discussed in the previous section. However,
the anisotropy, incorporated into the method through Equations 2.82, 2.83 and
2.84, leads to a similar amplitude for the peak transmission sensitivity.
In Figure 3.11 the nondimensionalised reception sensitivity frequency re-
sponse is shown as a function of the ceramic volume fraction. As before, the
addition of the polymer serves to increase the amplitude of the main lobe. As
57
the volume fraction of the ceramic decreases the main peak disappears and the
device no longer displays the desired resonant behaviour. The frequency shift
in the resonant modes is more pronounced than in Figures 3.9 and 3.10 and
this is further highlighted in the electrical impedance frequency profile shown
in Figure 3.12. Figures 3.13 and 3.14 show the mechanical impedance (Zc ) and
the electromechanical coupling coefficient (k̄t ) (calculated using equation (2.85))
against ceramic volume fraction ψ respectively. This efficiency is also exhibited
by the electromechanical coupling coefficient shown in Figure 3.14. The peak
value of around k = 0.73 is achieved at a volume fraction of polymer of ψ = 0.55.
The high attenuation leads to a clearer separation between the loss/no loss pro-
files.
58
are produced from a 2-dimensional model of the 1-3 piezoelectric composite us-
ing the PZFlex code [58], the model represents a slice through the transducer
structure and is configured with a boundary of void elements, equivalent me-
chanically and acoustically to vacuum, in order to represent the transducer as
a freely vibrating structure. In order to accurately represent the propagating
wave fronts, the spatial discretisation of the model was 15 elements per wave-
length at the highest frequency of interest, 5MHz in this case. The mechanical
excitation was provided by an impulsive load at one end of the transducer struc-
ture, the mechanical propagation field was allowed to evolve and temporally
and spatially sampled along the width dimension. The data was then processed
using a 2D fast Fourier transform [29, 30] to obtain the behaviour plotted in
Figure 3.15 Plot (a) shows the response when using a standard hardset polymer
which has a low shear attenuation (see Table 2.3). The oscillations in the electri-
cal impedance at the lower frequencies represent the undesirable low frequency
modes which interfere with the piston-like motion of the device. Because of the
high computational cost of FEM, simulations are run in short duration. Due
to the short simulation times, these lower frequency modes are only sampled in
the time domain over relatively few cycles, therefore the fast Fourier transform
of this signal is less accurate and noisy at these lower frequencies. It is neces-
sary to use a higher dimensional model, such as the FEM used here, to display
these modes; the one-dimensional LSM method has a smooth impedance curve
at these frequencies. However, the two methods do agree on the magnitude and
trend of the curve in this region. As the frequency increases the two methods do
differ substantially. The LSM prediction of the electrical impedance magnitude
at the first peak (the mechanical resonant frequency) is much lower than that
given by the FEM, and a larger bandwidth results. The location of this peak
is also slightly shifted to a higher frequency. In plot (b) a softset polymer filler
is used which has high shear and longitudinal attenuation (see Table 3.2). This
60
has damped out the unwanted, low frequency modes but there may well be a
decoupling of the ceramic and polymer phases. This would subsequently inhibit
its ability to transfer energy into the load medium and help explain the drop
in the peak electrical impedance that can be seen. There is better agreement
between the two methods on the magnitude of the first peak impedance, al-
though the frequency discrepancy remains. In plot (c) a material with a very
high shear attenuation and a relatively low longitudinal attenuation is modelled
(see Table 3.2, material HP20). This material should be able to damp out the
unwanted shear modes which propagate through the polymer whilst having suf-
ficient stiffness in the thickness direction to remain in phase with the ceramic
pillars. Both methods are in agreement over the form of the electrical impedance
profile with the FEM approach predicting a far lower value at the electrical res-
onant frequency. Plots (d) and (e) show the electrical impedance curves for
SBS1 and SBS2 in Table 3.3. These materials are similar to HP20, having high
shear attenuation and low longitudinal attenuation, although they are slightly
less stiff and the attenuation coefficients are smaller. Both plots show reasonable
agreement between the two methods. SBS4 has a reduced degree of attenuation
from these materials but it is slightly stiffer (see Table 3.3). Although there
is still good agreement between the two methods around the resonant modes,
this is less true at the lower frequencies. The FEM predicts a lowering of the
impedance in the lower frequency range and this is probably due to the polymer
and ceramic phases oscillating independently.
3.5 Conclusions
Frequency dependent, elastic loss was introduced to the LSM, and an SBS trans-
ducer with high shear loss was compared to an equivalent transducer with a
standard passive filler. By comparing a device with no loss to that with loss in-
corporated, it was shown that the lossy transducer gave very similar results, but
61
Z (kΩ) Z (kΩ)
80 80
60 60
40 40
1
f (MHz) 1
f (MHz)
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
(a) (b)
Z (kΩ) Z (kΩ)
80 80
60 60
40 40
1
f (MHz) 1
f (MHz)
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
(c) (d)
Z (kΩ) Z (kΩ)
80 80
60 60
40 40
(e) (f)
was slightly damped. It was found that by using the anistropic SBS filler, the
transducer will perform well over a larger range of frequencies and dampen out
unwanted lateral modes. There was a comparison made between the LSM and
FEM for a range of polymer composite fillers. This confirmed that the LSM was
robust as the thickness mode response matched well for each comparison. The
drawback with the LSM modelling is that it is only a one-dimensional model,
62
hence additional modes which occur in the lateral directions cannot be investi-
gated here. Plane wave expansion methods [74], that incorporate lamina models
[68, 15] of the SBS to describe its anisotropy, will be investigated in Chapter 5.
Chapter 4
Modelling of Composite
Transducers using the Plane
Wave Expansion Method
4.1 Introduction
In this chapter the three-dimensional plane wave expansion (PWE) model of
the 1-3 composite is derived. The geometry of the transducer is described in
terms of a two-dimensional, spatial Fourier series and then the PWE method
and associated boundary conditions are outlined. The derivation of Wilm et
al [74] is extended here to include the Poynting vector, a parameter scaling
to reduce ill-conditioning, an admittance that incorporates a dependency on
the spatial wavelength of the driving voltage, a comparison of the PWE method
with the Rayleigh-Lamb equation and linear systems modelling, the dependency
of the determinant of the harmonic analysis matrix on the driving frequency
and wavenumber, and a mode identification methodology for both 2-2 and 1-3
composite transducers using profiles of the displacements, Poynting vectors and
electrical potential.
Ideally a single longitudinal mode in the thickness direction will drive the
transducer in a piston like fashion. As discussed in Chapter 1, other modes,
propagating in other directions, can interfere with this behaviour. Hence it
63
64
x1
x2
p2
p2 t
x1
p1
s
s
(a) p1 (b) t
Figure 4.1: (a) Plan view of one period of a 1-3 piezoelectric transducer in the
x1 -x2 plane and (b) three-dimensional geometry (the x3 axis is in the vertical
direction) over a few periods of the 1-3 connectivity piezoelectric transducer.
The model is configured for periodic 2-2 and 1-3 composites with thickness
in the x3 direction (see Figure 4.1). By using the periodicity of the structure in
the x1 − x2 plane, the material constants, M (r), can be expanded as a Fourier
series where M represents either the density ρ, the elasticity tensor cijkl , the
65
piezoelectric stress tensor eijk , or the permittivity tensor ij . For the 1-3 com-
posite structure shown in Figure (4.1) the material constants only depend on x1
and x2 . Denote by p1 the period of the geometry in the x1 direction and by p2
the period of the geometry in the x2 direction. The width of the ceramic pillar
in the x1 and x2 direction is denoted by s and t, respectively. That is
Multiplying both sides by e(2πn/p2 )x2 and integrating with respect to x2 from
−p2 /2 to p2 /2 then multiplying by e(2πm/p1 )x1 and integrating with respect to
x1 from −p1 /2 to p1 /2 gives
Z p1 Z p2
2 2
( 2πm x1 + 2πn x2 )
M (x1 , x2 )e p
1 p 2 dx2 dx1 = p1 p2 Mmn , (4.3)
p1 p2
− 2
− 2
since
Z pi
2
−( 2πb xi ) 0, for b Z, b 6= 0
e pi dxi = (4.4)
−
pi pi , for b = 0.
2
(φ − θ)t πms
Mm0 = sin( ) m = ±1, ±2, ... (4.6)
p2 πm p1
(φ − θ)s πnt
M0n = sin( ) n = ±1, ±2, ... (4.7)
p1 πn p2
(φ − θ) πms πnt
Mmn = 2
sin( ) sin( ), m, n = ±1, ±2, ... (4.8)
π mn p1 p2
Note that M00 = θ + (φ − θ)st/p1 p2 and this can be expressed as
where ψ = st/p1 p2 is the volume fraction of φ. So, as expected, the first Fourier
coefficient is the simple mixing rule average of the two materials. This double
subscript notation can be simplified by ordering the Fourier coefficients as shown
in Figure 4.2.
.. .. .. .. ..
. . . . .
.. .. .. .. ..
. . . . .
s 2π s,1 2π s,2
G = H , H ,0 , (4.11)
p1 p2
then (4.2) can be rewritten for a finite number of terms (N in direction x1 and
M in direction x2 ) as
L
s
X
M (x1 , x2 ) = M s e−G .r . (4.12)
s=1
s,i th
where H is the i component of element s of H and L = (2N + 1)(2M + 1).
The 2-2 geometry is described in this framework by setting t = p2 and M = 0.
In a similar way the Floquet theorem states that all fields F (r, t), for in-
stance displacements or stresses, propagating within periodic structures can be
approximated as the series
L
s ·r)
X
F (r, t, k, ω) = F s (k, ω)e(ωt−k·r−G (4.13)
s=1
The piezoelectric constitutive equations together with Newton’s second law and
Gauss’s law for dielectric media are [1]
68
∂ 2 uj
ρ = Tij,i (4.16)
∂t2
Di,i = 0. (4.17)
These constitute 16 equations in the 16 unknowns which are the stresses Tij , the
displacements uk , the electric potential φ and the electrical displacements Di .
Denote the generalized displacement field by u where u = (u1 , u2 , u3 , u4 = φ)
and the generalized stress vectors by ti = (Ti1 , Ti2 , Ti3 , Di ). Substituting the
expansions (4.12) and (4.13) into equation (4.14) and (4.15) yields
L L X
L
p r +Gt )·r
X X
Tijp e−G ·r = −(kl + Grl )(ctijkl urk + etlij ur4 )e−(G (4.18)
p=1 r=1 t=1
and
L L X
L
p r +Gt )·r
X X
Dip e−G ·r = −(kl + Grl )(etikl urk − til ur4 )e−(G . (4.19)
p=1 r=1 t=1
p ·r
Now multiply equations (4.18) and (4.19) by eG and integrate over one
period (from −p1 /2 to p1 /2 in x1 and −p2 /2 to p2 /2 in x2 ); this essentially
p
equates the coefficients of e−G ·r . Obviously only certain combinations of Gr
and Gt on the right hand side of these equations will combine to equate to a
Gp term on the left hand side. This restriction is captured by V p,q which, for
a given Fourier term H p , describes the Fourier terms H q which survive on the
69
right hand side of (4.18) and (4.19) after integration. It transpires that
L+1 L+1
p,1 q,1
p + 2 − q, if 1 ≤ p + 2 − q ≤ L, |H − H | ≤ N
p,q
V = and |H p,2 − H q,2 | ≤ M (4.20)
0, otherwise
p,q
where, for example, cVijkl = 0 if V p,q = 0. Using equation (4.20), equations
(4.18) and (4.19) can now be written
L
p,q p,q
X
Tijp = −(kl + Gql )(cVijkl uqk + eVlij uq4 ) (4.21)
q=1
and
L
p,q p,q
X
Dip = −(kl + Gql )(eVikl uqk − ilV uq4 ). (4.22)
q=1
In terms of the generalized stress vectors, (4.21) and (4.22) combine to give
L
X
tpi = (kl + Gql )Ap,q
il u
q
(4.23)
q=1
where
The same analysis can be carried out for equations (4.16) and (4.17) to obtain
the expression
L
X
(ki + Gpi )tpi = ω 2 Rp,q uq , (4.25)
q=1
where
70
p,q
ρV
0 0 0
p,q
p,q
0 ρV 0 0
R = V p,q
.
0 0 ρ 0
0 0 0 0
T T
Now let Ti = t1i , . . . , tpi , . . . , tLi , U = u1 , . . . , uq , . . . , uL ,
1,1
Aij A1,2 ij . . . A 1,L
ij
A2,1 A2,2 . . . A2,L
ij ij ij
Aij = . , (4.26)
. . .
.. .. .. ..
AL,1
ij AL,2
ij . . . AL,L ij
and
R1,1 R1,2 . . . R1,L
R2,1 R2,2 . . . R2,L
R= .. .. .. . (4.27)
..
. . . .
RL,1 RL,2 . . . RL,L
Equations (4.23) and (4.25) can then be written compactly as
and
ω 2 RU = Γi (Ti ) (4.29)
where
(ki + G1i )I4 0 ... 0
0 (ki + G2i )I4 . . . 0
Γi = .. .. .. . (4.30)
..
. . . .
0 0 . . . (ki + GLi )I4
Multiplying equation (4.28) by Γi and using equation (4.29) gives
ω 2 RU = BU + C1 k3 U + k3 (T3 ) (4.32)
and
k3 (T3 ) = k3 (C2 + Dk3 )U (4.33)
71
P P P
where B = i,j=1,2 Γi Aij Γj , C1 = i=1,2 Γi Ai3 , C2 = j=1,2 A3j Γj and D = A33 .
These are combined to give the generalised eigenvalue problem
2
ω R−B 0 U C1 I U
= k3 (4.34)
−C2 I T3 D 0 T3
(r)
(r) U
in the 8L eigenvalues k3
and corresponding eigenvectors . Solving
T3
equation (4.34) and introducing the relative amplitudes A(r) gives
L 8L q
(r) !
u(r, t) X q ·r
X (r) u
= e(ωt−k1 x1 −k2 x2 ) e−G A(r) e −k3 x3
. (4.35)
tq3 (r, t) tq3
q=1 r=1
Energy distribution within the transducer can be used to clarify particular types
of modes in conjunction with examining the profiles of the displacements, stresses
and electric potential (see the detailed discussion on waves in Section 1.1). The
energy in the device can be examined using the Poynting vector which is defined
as
Pj = −Tij ui,t + φDj,t . (4.36)
Pj = −(cijkl uk,l + elij φ,l )ui,t + φ(ejkl uk,l − jl φ,l ),t . (4.37)
Since for m = 1, 2
L 8L
!
(r)
−Gq ·r q,(r)
X X
uk,m = e(ωt−k1 x1 −k2 x2 ) −(km +Gq,m )e A(r) e −k3 x3
uk , (4.38)
q=1 r=1
and for m = 3,
L 8L
!
(r)
−Gq ·r (r) q,(r)
X X
uk,3 = e(ωt−k1 x1 −k2 x2 ) e −k3 A(r) e −k3 x3
uk (4.39)
q=1 r=1
q,(r)
then uk,t = ωuk and (uk,l )t = ωuk,l. The notation uk denotes the entry in
the r th eigenvector pertaining to the q th element of the displacement u in the xk
direction. Hence the Poynting vector can now be written as
72
Pj = −ω(cijkl uk,l + elij φ,l )ui + ωφ(ejkl uk,l − jl φ,l ). (4.40)
L 8L
!
(r)
−Gq ·r q,(r)
X X
(ωt−k1 x1 −k2 x2 ) (r) −k3 x3
T3i = e e A e T3i . (4.41)
q=1 r=1
q ·r
Equation (4.42) is then multiplied by eG and integrated over one period x1 ×
x2 −p2 1 , p21 × −p2 2 , p22 to get
8L
(r)
q,(r)
X
0= A(r) e−k3 h T3i , q = 1, . . . , L. (4.43)
r=1
8N
q,(r)
X
0= A(r) T3i , q = 1, . . . , L (4.44)
r=1
The voltage is sinusoidal in time and the device has a discrete set of electrodes on
the upper face (see Figure 4.3). In order to describe this as a boundary condition
in our continuum, the electrode spatial distribution is described as a continu-
ous sinusoid. Hence the wavelength of this sinusoid achieves its minimum value
when the voltage at adjacent modes is precisely 180o out of phase. The electrical
Top electrodes
Voltage
Figure 4.3: The top electrode spacing and an example applied voltage when
γ1 = k1 p1 /(2π) = 1/2.
q
at x3 = h. Equation (4.46) is then multiplied by eG ·r and integrated over the
h i h i
p1 p1 p2 p2
spatial electrode period x1 × x2 − 4γ ,
1 4γ1
× − ,
4γ2 4γ2
. Since
p2 p1
p1 p2
Z Z
4γ2 4γ1 q q
e−G ·r eG ·r dx1 dx2 = , (4.47)
p
− 4γ2
p
− 4γ1 4γ1 γ2
2 1
and Z p2 Z p1
4γ2 4γ1
e((k1 +2π/p1 (H ) dx dx
q,1 −γ q,2 −γ
1 ))x1 +(k2 +2π/p2 (H 2 ))x2
1 2
p p
− 4γ2 − 4γ1
2 1
" # 4γp1 " # 4γp2
(k1 +2π/p1 (H q,1 −γ1 ))x1 1 (k2 +2π/p2 (H q,2 −γ2 ))x2 2
e e
=
(k1 + 2π/p1 (H q,1 − γ1 )) p
(k2 + 2π/p2 (H q,2 − γ2 )) p
− 4γ1 − 4γ2
1 2
p1 p2
! !
−2 sin(k1 + 2π/p1 (H q,1 − γ1 )) 4γ 1
−2 sin(k2 + 2π/p2 (H q,2 − γ2 )) 4γ 2
=
(k1 + 2π/p1 (H q,1 − γ1 )) −(k2 + 2π/p2 (H q,2 − γ2 ))
p1 p2 q,1 p1 q,2 p2
= sinc (k1 + 2π/p1 (H − γ1 )) sinc (k2 + 2π/p2 (H − γ2 )) .
4γ1 γ2 4γ1 4γ2
(4.48)
At x3 = 0, V0 = 0 and so
8L
X
A(r) φq,(r) = 0 q = 1, . . . L. (4.50)
r=1
transducer. This gives rise to a system of equations in the form XA(r) = 0,where
X is an 8L×8L matrix. The modes are then determined by identifying where the
determinant of X is equal to zero. Unfortunately the matrix X is ill-conditioned
[38]. To help obviate this problem the matrix entries are balanced by scaling the
parameters of the model (see Table 4.1). Each of the parameters is made O(1)
by a judicious choice of the scalings α, β, γ and ϕ so that 5 equations in four
unknowns must be satisfied. This is done by scaling the thickness h by specifying
β, scaling the density ρ by specifying α, scaling the piezoelectric stress tensor
eijk by specifying ϕ, scaling the elasticity tensor cijkl by specifying γ and this
results in an appropriate scaling for the permittivity tensor ij .
Table 4.1: Dimensions and scaling parameters for the material properties.
∇2 φair = 0 (4.52)
∂φair
D3air = −0 . (4.53)
∂x3
L
q ·r
X
(ωt−k1 x1 −k2 x2 )
= e e−G
q=1
8L !
X 2π q,1 2 2π q,2 2 (r)
× (k1 + H ) + (k2 + H ) A(r) e−k3 h φq,(r) .
r=1
p1 p2
(4.56)
(r)
From equation (4.56) it can be seen that k3 = ±|κq | where
2 2
q 2 2π 2π q,2
(κ ) = k1 + H q,1 + k2 + H . (4.57)
p1 p2
(r)
For bounded solutions in equation (4.35) it is required that −k3 < 0, that is
(r)
k3 = |κq |. (4.58)
77
Now, by using equations (4.51) and (4.58), equation (4.53) can be written as
∂φ substrate
D3air |x3 =h = −0 |x3 =h
∂x3
L 8L
!
X q
X (r)
(ωt−k1 x1 −k2 x2 )
= e e−G ·r 0 |κq |A(r) e −k3 h
φq,(r) .
q=1 r=1
(4.59)
The difference between the normal electrical displacement in the material and in
air is the charge distribution at the interface of the transducer. The admittance
is then given by the ratio of the current I to the voltage V , both averaged
over the transducer surface. Utilising the electrical periodicity of the device
architecture then gives
∂
R ν42 R ν41
∂t −
ν2
−
ν1 D3substrate − D3air dx1 dx2
4 4
Y = ν2 R ν41 “ ” |x3 =h . (4.60)
R ωt− 2π x1 − 2π x2
V0 4
ν
− 42 −
ν1 e ν 1 ν 2 dx1 dx2
4
Now
Z ν2 Z ν1 “ ”
4 4 2πγ 2πγ
ωt− p 1 x1 − p 2 x2
V0 e 1 2 dx1 dx2
ν2 ν1
− 4
− 4
" 2πγ1 # 4γp1 " 2πγ2 # 4γp2
− x1 1 − x2 2
ωt e p1
e p2
= V0 e
− 2πγ
p1
1
p − 2πγ
p2
2
p
− 4γ1 − 4γ2
1 2
! !
− π2 π2 − π2 π2
e −e e −e
= V0 eωt
− 2πγ
p1
1
− 2πγ
p2
2
! !
ωt −2 −2
= V0 e
− 2πγ
p1
1
− 2πγ
p2
2
p1 p2
= V0 eωt . (4.61)
π 2 γ1 γ2
78
Using equations (4.59) and (4.35) the current can be written as,
L Z p2 Z p1 “ ”
4γ2 4γ1
− (k1 + 2π H q,1 )x1 +(k2 + 2π H q,1 )x2
X
ωt
I = ωe e p 1 p 2 dx1 dx2
p p
q=1 − 4γ2 − 4γ1
2 1
8L
!
(r)
q,(r)
X
× A(r) e −k3 h
D3 − 0 |κq |φq,(r) . (4.62)
r=1
4.5 Results
The methodology presented in the previous section is utilised here to investi-
gate the modal behaviour of a 2-2 composite transducer (Section 4.5.1) and a
1-3 composite transducer (Section 4.5.2) both composed of PZT5H ceramic and
HY1300/CY1301 polymer. For piezoelectric transducers the resonant frequency
is dictated by the thickness of the transducer, therefore in NDT applications
(1 − 10 MHz) the thickness required are in hundreds of microns. The thick-
ness of the transducer is also central to the choice of scaling parameters and a
thickness of 200µm is chosen here to illustrate the operational characteristics of
the transducer. This scaling allows essentially any thickness to be adequately
simulated. The 2-2 topology is described by setting t = p2 and the wave number
k2 to zero.
79
Device A B
Composite type 2-2 1-3
Ceramic PZT5H PZT5H
Polymer HY1300/CY1301 Hardset HY1300/CY1301 Hardset
Thickness (mm) (h) 0.2 0.2
Kerf (mm)(p1 − s) 0.06 0.06
Saw pitch (mm) (p1 ) 0.2 0.2
To obtain the dispersion curves the short circuit boundary conditions are
used (V0 = 0 in equation (4.49)) to give a system of equations of type XA(r) = 0.
The absolute value of the determinant of the matrix X is then calculated over
a selected range of frequencies and k1 values. Taking the logarithm of this
determinant, as shown in Figure 4.4, highlights the minima which correspond
to the modes where these boundary conditions are satisfied. It is the relative
magnitude of the determinant that is significant and it is important that this
surface is sufficiently smooth so that the ridges (modes) in Figure 4.4 can be
easily identified in an automated search algorithm. To identify the dispersive
80
ω
0 5 10
0
0.2
k 1 p1
2π
0.4
PSfrag replacements
-70
-75
log |Det X| -80
Figure 4.4: The determinant of the matrix of coefficients arising from the short
circuit boundary conditions versus the driving frequency ω (MHz) and the nondi-
mensionalised parameter k1 p1 /2π for device A as described in Table 4.2 (see
Tables 4.3 and 4.4 for material properties).
ω
2π
10
Mode b
8
6 Thickness Mode
First Anti-Symmetrical
Lamb Mode
PSfrag replacements 4
Mode a
2
k 1 p1
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 2π
pillars (intra-pillar modes) and within the pillars (inter-pillar modes). These
unwanted modes normally occur at a higher frequency than the thickness mode.
To help identify the symmetric and anti-symmetric Lamb modes the dispersion
relationship for a homogeneous, isotropic, non-piezoelectric and lossless material,
the Rayleigh-Lamb equation, can be used. It is defined as [29]
p p !
tan((ωh/2) (c2 − c22 )/c22 c2 ) 4 ((c/c1 )2 − 1)((c/c2 )2 − 1)
± = 0, (4.64)
(2 − (c/c2 )2 )2
p
tan((ωh/2) (c2 − c21 )/c21 c2 )
vp (kms−1 )
10
8 a1
s1
6 s0
PSfrag replacements
4
a0
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
f × h (kHzm)
Figure 4.6: Phase velocity (vp ) versus frequency (f ) × thickness (h) product for
device A using the PWE method (dotted lines) and the Rayleigh-Lamb equation
(solid lines).
than the thickness mode. These results are presented in Figure 4.6 where the
Rayleigh-Lamb equation is compared to the homogenised form of the PWE
method (N, M = 0). It is clear from Figure 4.6 that both methods predict the
first anti-symmetrical Lamb mode (a0 ) and the first symmetrical mode (s0 ) to
have the same form but the results of each method do not match quantitatively.
This is to be expected since the PWE method is for a piezoelectric, heterogeneous
and anisotropic material and the Rayleigh-Lamb equation is for an isotropic
material.
Since the lateral dimension of the ceramic pillar (s) is smaller than the thick-
ness (h) the intra-pillar mode will be at a higher frequency than the thickness
mode [29], but it can be confused with inter-pillar modes and other high fre-
quency modes. Hence a modal analysis involving the variations in the displace-
ment, electrical potential and Poynting vector is used to properly identify each
mode.
For example, the results for k1 = 500m−1 and f = 0.41 MHz are shown
in Figure 4.7. To classify the modes the relative magnitudes of the Poynting
84
P1 P3
x3 -6
50 100 150 200 8·10
0.95
-6
6·10
0.9
PSfrag replacements 4·10-6
PSfrag replacements 0.85
-6
0.8 P1 2·10
P3
x3
P3 0.75 50 100 150 200
0.8
u1
0.8 0.6
0.6 0.4
0.4
0.2 0.2
u3
x3
50 100 150 200
(e)
Figure 4.7: Characteristics of mode a within device A (k1 = 500 m−1 and
f = 0.41 MHz). (a) Normalised Poynting vector P1 (W/m2 ), (b) normalised
Poynting vector P3 (W/m2 ), (c) displacement in the x1 direction u1 (µm), (d)
displacement in the x3 direction u3 (µm) and normalised electrical potential φ
(V) against x3 (µm).
vector and displacement in each direction is important, therefore each mode has
been normalised independently. The plots are all nearly symmetric about the
midplane in the thickness direction x3 . In plot (a), the Poynting vector P1 has
maxima at x3 = 24.5µm and 175µm with thickness h = 200µm. By investigating
the displacements it is found that u1 in plot (c) has its maximum displacement
in the midplane of the transducer and is significantly larger than u3 , which
85
x3
2
1.5
PSfrag replacements 1
0.5
-4 4
x1
P3 -2 2
(a)
x3
2
1.5
PSfrag replacements 1
0.5
-4 4
x1
P3 -2 2
(b)
Figure 4.8: The real part of the in-plane displacement of mode a within device
A (k1 = 500 m−1 and f = 0.41 MHz) in the x3 -x1 plane x2 = 0 where (a) is at
time t0 and (b) is at time t0 plus half the period. The thick regions bounded by
the black lines represent the ceramic pillars and the thin regions represent the
polymer.
x3
1.5
0.5
PSfrag replacements 0
x1
-2 -1 1 2
(a)
x3
1.5
0.5
PSfrag replacements 0
x1
0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5 1.75
(b)
Figure 4.9: Displacement (real part) (u) of a bulk wave within device A (k1 = 500
m−1 and f = 0.41 MHz) during excitation. Plot (a) illustrates the movement
of specific points within the ceramic as time is varied and (b) illustrates the
movement of specific points over time within the polymer (x1 is in arbitrary
units).
87
in order to clarify the particle’s motion. The general motion of the particle is
elliptical, with the particle periodically returning to its original position. The
curved arrows indicate whether the motion is clockwise or anti-clockwise. It is
also clear in Figure 4.9 that the displacement is dominant in the x1 direction,
which is indicative of this being a bulk longitudinal wave or the first symmetrical
Lamb wave.
P1 P3
1
0.2
0.8
0.15
0.6
0.1
PSfrag replacements 0.4 PSfrag replacements
PSfrag replacements 0.05
0.2
x3
P 1
x3 P1 x3
P3 50 100 150 200 50 100 150 200
P3
(a) (b)
u1
u1 u3
1 50
0.005
PSfrag replacements 200
0.8
x3 0.004
150
P1 0.6 100
PSfrag replacements 0.003
P3 50
0.4 x3
P1 0.002
0.2
u3 P3
x3 x3
50 100 150 200 50 100 150 200
u1
(c) u3 (d)
50
200 φ
150 1
100 0.8
50
0.005 0.6
0.004 0.4
0.003
0.002 0.2
x3
50 100 150 200
(e)
Figure 4.10: The first anti-symmetrical Lamb mode for device A (k1 = 5500 m−1
and f = 1.93 MHz). (a) Normalised Poynting vector P1 (W/m2 ), (b) normalised
Poynting vector P3 (W/m2 ), (c) displacement u1 (µm), (d) displacement u3 (µm)
and normalised electrical potential φ (V) against x3 (µm).
To find the first anti-symmetrical Lamb wave, equation (4.64) is used to give
88
x3
2
1.5
PSfrag replacements 1
0.5
x1
P3 -4 -2 2 4
(a)
x3
2
1.5
PSfrag replacements 1
0.5
x1
P3 -4 -2 2 4
(b)
Figure 4.11: The real part of the in-plane displacement of the first anti-
symmetrical Lamb mode for device A (k1 = 5500 m−1 and f = 1.93 MHz)
in the x3 -x1 plane x2 = 0 where (a) at time t0 and (b) at time t0 plus half
the period. The thick regions bounded by the black lines represent the ceramic
pillars and the thin regions represent the polymer.
a qualitative form for the mode and the PWE method is then used to pinpoint
it more precisely. The point k1 = 5500m−1 and f = 1.93 MHz is investigated.
Looking at Figure 4.10 the Poynting vector in the x1 direction dominates. Most
of the energy is concentrated at the transducer faces, although this persists
for at least a couple of wavelengths into the interior of the transducer. The
displacement is also predominantly in the x1 direction with any movement re-
stricted to two wavelengths from the transducer faces. Figure 4.11 illustrates
that the wave is anti-symmetric and Figure 4.12 shows elliptical motion in the
anti-clockwise direction at the bottom face, elliptical motion in the clockwise
direction at the top face but only motion in the x3 direction in the middle of
89
x3
1.5
0.5
PSfrag replacements 0
x1
-0.2 -0.1
5 -0.1 -0.0
5 0.05 0.1 0.15
(a)
x3
1.5
0.5
PSfrag replacements
0
x1
0.9 0.95 1 1.05 1.1
(b)
Figure 4.12: Displacement (real part) (u) of the first anti-symmetrical Lamb
mode for device A (k1 = 5500 m−1 and f = 1.93 MHz) during excitation. Plot
(a) illustrates the movement of specific points within the ceramic as time is
varied and (b) illustrates the movement of specific points over time within the
polymer (x1 is in arbitrary units).
90
the transducer for both materials. This mode clearly has most of its energy and
displacement at the faces of the transducer therefore it can be categorised as the
first anti-symmetrical Lamb mode.
P1 P3
1
0.00012
0.0001 0.8
0.00008 0.6
0.00006
PSfrag replacements 0.00004 PSfrag replacements 0.4
0.00002 0.2
x3 P1
50 100 150 200 x3
P3 50 100 150 200
(a) (b)
u1 u3
0.0006 1
0.0005
PSfrag replacements PSfrag replacements 0.8
0.0004
x3 x3 0.6
P1 0.0003 P1
0.4
P3 0.0002 P3
0.0001 0.2
x3 u1
50 100 150 200 x3
u3 500 100 150 200
(c) (d)
φ
1
PSfrag replacements
0.8
x3
P1 0.6
P3
0.4
u1 0.2
u3
x3
50 100 150 200
(e)
Figure 4.13: The thickness mode for device A (k1 = 500 (m−1 ) and f = 6.84
MHz). (a) Normalised Poynting vector P1 (W/m2 ), (b) normalised Poynting
vector P3 (W/m2 ), (c) displacement u1 (µm), (d) displacement u3 (µm) and
normalised electrical potential φ (V) against x3 (µm).
The thickness mode at k1 = 500m−1 and f = 6.84 MHz shown in Figure 4.13
shows that all the displacements, energy and electrical potential are symmetric
in the thickness direction. The Poynting vector in the x1 direction has very little
energy compared to P3 which has energy distributed throughout the transducer,
91
x3
2
1.5
PSfrag replacements 1
0.5
x1
P3 -4 -3 -2 -1 1 2 3 4
(a)
x3
2
1.5
PSfrag replacements 1
0.5
x1
P3 -4 -3 -2 -1 1 2 3 4
(b)
Figure 4.14: The real part of the in-plane displacement of the thickness mode
for device A (k1 = 500 (m−1 ) and f = 6.84 MHz) in the x3 -x1 plane x2 = 0
where (a) is at time t0 and (b) is at time t0 plus half the period. The thick
regions bounded by the black lines represent the ceramic pillars and the thin
regions represent the polymer.
x3
1.5
0.5
PSfrag replacements 0
x1
-0.0
5 -0.0
4 -0.0
3 -0.0
2 -0.0
1 0.01
(a)
x3
1.5
0.5
PSfrag replacements
0
x1
0.94 0.96 0.98 1 1.02
(b)
Figure 4.15: Displacement (real part) (u) of the thickness mode for device A
(k1 = 500 (m−1 ) and f = 6.84 MHz) during excitation. Plot (a) illustrates
the movement of specific points within the ceramic as time is varied and (b)
illustrates the movement of specific points over time within the polymer (x1 is
in arbitrary units).
93
P1 P3
0.6 1
0.5 0.8
0.4
0.6
0.3
0.2 PSfrag replacements 0.4
PSfrag replacements 0.1 0.2
P1
x3 x3
50 100 150 200 50 100 150 200
(a) (b)
u1 u3
30
1.2
25
PSfrag replacements PSfrag replacements 1
20
x3 x3 0.8
P1 15 P1 0.6
P3 10 P3 0.4
5 0.2
u1
x3 x3
u3 50 100 150 200 50 100 150 200
(c) (d)
φ
1
PSfrag replacements
0.8
x3
P1 0.6
P3
0.4
u1 0.2
u3
x3
50 100 150 200
(e)
Figure 4.16: Characteristics of mode b for device A (k1 = 1.4 × 104 m−1 and
f = 11.81 MHz). (a) Normalised Poynting vector P1 (W/m2 ), (b) normalised
Poynting vector P3 (W/m2 ), (c) displacement u1 (µm), (d) displacement u3 (µm)
and normalised electrical potential φ (V) against x3 (µm).
direction and distributed evenly throughout the transducer. The in-plane com-
ponents of the displacement in Figure 4.17 show the ceramic being stretched
and squashed at opposite sides of the transducer and being mainly stationary
within the transducer. Figure 4.18 shows motion in the anti-clockwise direction
at the top face, motion in the clockwise direction at the bottom face and less
motion in the anti-clockwise direction near the middle of the transducer for both
materials. This mode clearly has most of its energy at the faces of the trans-
94
ducer and therefore it could be identified as a surface skimming bulk wave (or
Bleustein-Gulyaev wave) or a Rayleigh wave.
x3
2
1.5
PSfrag replacements 1
0.5
x1
P3 -4 -2 2 4
(a)
x3
2
1.5
PSfrag replacements 1
0.5
x1
P3 -4 -2 2 4
(b)
Figure 4.17: The real part of the in-plane displacement of mode b for device A
(k1 = 1.4 × 104 m−1 and f = 11.81 MHz) in the x3 -x1 plane x2 = 0 where (a) is
at time t0 and (b) is at time t0 plus half the period. The thick regions bounded
by the black lines represent the ceramic pillars and the thin regions represent
the polymer.
95
Resonant frequencies are also given by the maxima of the electrical con-
ductance. By examining the conductance plot in Figure 4.19, the thickness
mode can be identified as the central ridge of the plot at around 6.5 MHz. The
lower frequency maxima correspond to the first symmetrical Lamb wave passing
through the path of the bulk waves whilst the intra-pillar mode is the first set
of peaks to the right of the thickness mode at around 10 MHz. Figure 4.19
is in good agreement with the modes identified in Figure 4.5. The advantages
of plotting the conductance is that the relative ampiltude of each mode can
clearly be seen and any spurious points found in the dispersion diagram can be
eradicated. There is a reasonable band gap around the thickness mode which
indicates that the transducer should perform efficiently. Figure 4.20 shows the
surface displacements for the thickness mode over three periods of the structure.
The displacement in the x3 direction dominates with the ceramic and passive
phase moving in phase, although the profile is not ideally flat.
0.1
0.2 k 1 p1
2π
0.3
0.4
2
1.5
PSfrag replacements
1 Y
0.5
0
0 2.5 5 7.5 10
f
x3
1.5
0.5
PSfrag replacements 0
x1
-0.0
6 -0.0
4 -0.0
2 0.02
(a)
x3
1.5
0.5
PSfrag replacements
0
x1
0.975 0.98 0.985 0.99
(b)
Figure 4.18: Displacement (real part) (u) of mode b for device A (k1 = 1.4 × 104
m−1 and f = 11.81 MHz) during excitation. Plot (a) illustrates the movement
of specific points within the ceramic as time is varied and (b) illustrates the
movement of specific points over time within the polymer (x1 is in arbitrary
units).
97
u1 u3
0.4 9
0.3 7
PSfrag replacements
0.2 5
PSfrag replacements
0.1
3
u1
x1 x1
-100 100 200 300 400 500 -100 100 200 300 400 500
(a) (b)
Figure 4.20: The displacements at the surface x3 = h for the thickness mode
for device A (k1 = 500 m−1 and f = 6.84 MHz). (a) in-plane displacement u1
versus x1 at x2 = 0, (b) out-of-plane displacement u3 versus x1 at x2 = 0. The
thick regions bounded by the dashed lines represent the ceramic pillars and the
thin regions represent the polymer.
The modal behaviour for a 1-3 composite transducer using PZT5H ceramic and
HY1300/CY1301 polymer can also be examined. The corresponding determi-
nant plot is shown in Figure 4.21. Additional modes will arise in the 1-3 compos-
ite since there is now cross-coupling in both the x1 and x2 direction (see Figure
4.22).
98
ω
0 5 10
0
0.2
k 1 p1
2π
0.4
PSfrag replacements
20
10
0 log|Det X|
Figure 4.21: The determinant of the matrix of coefficients arising from the
short circuit boundary conditions versus the driving frequency ω (MHz) and
thenondimensionalised wavenumber k1 p1 /2π for device B as described in Table
4.2 (see Tables 4.3 and 4.4 for material properties).
By examining the conductance plot in Figure 4.23, the thickness mode can be
identified as the central ridge of the plot at around 6.5 MHz. The lower frequency
maxima (the low amplitude peaks to the left of the main ridge) correspond to
a bulk wave and the first symmetrical Lamb wave passing through the path of
the thickness mode whilst the inter-pillar mode is the first set of peaks to the
right of the thickness mode at around 9 MHz. Figure 4.23 is in good agreement
with the modes identified in Figure 4.22.
99
ω
2π
10
PSfrag replacements
k 1 p1
γ1 = 2π
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
Figure 4.24 shows the surface displacements for the thickness mode over three
periods of the structure of a 1-3 composite transducer. The displacement in the
x3 direction dominates with the ceramic and passive phase moving in phase,
although again the surface is somewhat uneven.
100
0.1
0.2 k 1 p1
2π
0.3
0.4
2
1.5
1 Y
0.5
PSfrag replacements
0
0 2.5 5 7.5 10
ω
u1 u2
0.06 0.02
0.015
0.04 PSfrag replacements
0.01
PSfrag replacements
0.02
0.005
u1
x1 x1
-100 100 200 300 400 500 -100 100 200 300 400 500
(a) (b)
u3
1
0.6
u1
u2 0.4
x1
-100 100 200 300 400 500
(c)
Figure 4.24: The displacements of the surface x3 = h for the thickness mode
for device B (k1 = 500 m−1 and f = 6.99 MHz). (a) in-plane displacement u1
versus x1 at x2 = 0, (b) in-plane displacement u2 versus x1 at x2 = 0,(c) out-
of-plane displacement u3 versus x1 . The thick regions bounded by the dashed
lines represent the ceramic pillars and the thin regions represent the polymer.
101
4.6 Conclusions
The plane wave expansion method has been derived in this Chapter and extended
to provide a more complete analysis of the supported waves. Results have been
presented using this model for both 2-2 and 1-3 composite transducers made from
PZT5H ceramic and the standard hardset material HY1300/CY1301. Disper-
sion curves were produced and particular modes on these curves were identified
using the Poynting vector, electrical potential and the displacement. Admit-
tance curves were also produced which helped to clarify the important modes.
Ill-conditioning is present in the matrix inversion procedure used to find the
amplitudes of each mode, particularly for 1-3 configurations. Regularisation
techniques such as Tikhonov and truncated singular value decomposition can be
used to address this issue and will be discussed in the next chapter. Validation
of the model will be shown by comparison to finite element modelling in the
next chapter and the model will also be extended to incorporate elastic losses.
Chapter 5
5.1 Introduction
In this chapter, frequency dependent viscoelastic loss is incorporated into the
three-dimensional plane wave expansion model (PWE). The dispersive behaviour
of a 2-2 composite transducer will be examined and the effects of introducing
high shear attenuation into the passive phase will be investigated. The aim
is to increase the frequency band gap between the thickness mode and other
parasitic waves to obtain a higher transmission bandwidth. Scaling and regular-
isation techniques are introduced to reduce ill-conditioning in the large matrices
which arise in the PWE method. The identification of the modes is aided by
examining profiles of the displacements, electrical potential and Poynting vector
[49, 50, 51].
In Chapter 4 the PWE method was used to investigate dispersion relation-
ships for both 1-3 and 2-2 composite transducers but this analysis did not in-
clude any loss mechanisms. Loss is vital for reducing crosstalk between adjacent
ceramic pillars in the transducer. In addition the PWE method cannot be com-
pared to experimental results until loss is incorporated into the model. An
102
103
model we have chosen. Frequency dependent loss can be introduced into the
ceramic via
ω
tan δ = tan δ(ωI ), (5.1)
ωI
where ω is the angular frequency, tan δ(ωI ) is the measured loss tangent and ωI
is the angular frequency at which tan δ is measured. Equation (5.1) is used to
obtain the imaginary parts of the elastic constants within the ceramic at a given
frequency using
cijkl = cijkl (1 + tan δ). (5.2)
If the polymer phase is assumed to be isotropic then the elastic constants are
expressed in terms of the complex Lamé coefficients µ and λ, defined as
where vs is the shear velocity, vl is the longitudinal velocity and ρ is the density.
The loss is however usually expressed for these materials in terms of a longitu-
dinal attenuation coefficient (αl ) and a shear attenuation coefficient (αs ). These
can be related to tan δ via equation (3.11),
The frequency dependency can be included via the attenuation coefficients using
0
αl/s = αl,s (ω/ω0 )2 , where αl/s
0
is the experimentally measured attenuation coef-
ficient at frequency ω0 . Using Equations (5.4) and (5.5), the imaginary parts of
the Lamé coefficients are then given by
v s !
u
u 8α4 µ04 ρ 2ω4
µ00 = t 4s 4 1 + 1 + 4 04 (5.6)
ω ρ 4αs µ
105
and v
u s !
u 8α4 (λ0 + 2µ0 )4 ρ2 ω 4
λ00 = t l 4 4 1+ 1+ 4 0 − 2µ00 . (5.7)
ω ρ 4αl (λ + 2µ0 )4
0
So given αl,s , ω0 , λ0 , µ0 , ρ and ω, equations (5.6) and (5.7) can be used to give
the complex valued elasticity tensor in equation (4.14) and associated Fourier
coefficient in equation (4.18). The degree of shear loss can be varied by mul-
tiplying the shear attenuation coefficient αs by a parameter ζ. The change in
loss is then incorporated into the model through the imaginary parts of the
Lamé coefficients. The effect that changing from low shear attenuation to high
shear attenuation has on the frequency band gap surrounding the fundamental
thickness mode of the transducer will be investigated in section 5.4.2.
To derive the anisotropic coefficients for an SBS passive phase, the material
properties of polybutadiene (superscript pb) and polystyrene (superscript ps)
are mixed together using ’laminate’ mixing rules [68]. The coefficient c11 is
calculated from the mixing rule
cps pb
11 c11
c11 = , (5.8)
φcps pb
11 + (1 − φ)c11
which is also used to calculate c13 , c44 and 33 . The coefficient c12 is calculated
using
c12 = φcpb ps
12 + (1 − φ)c12 (5.9)
5.3 Implementation
From section 4.3 the vibrational modes of the transducer must satisfy the system
of equations XA(r) = Q, given by equations (4.43), (4.44), (4.49) and (4.50),
where X(k, ω) is an 8L × 8L matrix and Q(k) is a column vector of length 8L
where L = (2N +1)(2M +1). As the number of Fourier coefficients are increased
within the PWE method, the dimensions of X increase and the determinant
106
becomes too large to be stored. This problem occurs due to the exponential
terms which arise when calculating the boundary conditions at x3 = h. This
term affects the rows between 1 and 3(2N + 1) and 6(2N + 1) + 1 and 7(2N + 1)
in the matrix X. To prevent the problem occuring the row entries are multiplied
00 (r) )h
by a scale factor given by eMaxr (k3 , where k300 (r) is the imaginary part of the
(r)
wavenumber k3 . There are also numerical instabilities as the determinant of
X approaches zero due to ill-conditioning, and Tikhonov regularisation is used
here to circumvent this [41]. To implement this the matrix X is converted to a
real, symmetric form by multiplying it by its complex, conjugate X ∗ . The zero
eigenvalues of X are then translated along the real axis, away from the origin,
by adding a small amount, µ, to give
(X ∗ X + µI)A(r) = X ∗ Q. (5.10)
log |X ∗ X + µI|
140
120
100
PSfrag replacements 80
60 (c)
40 (a)
20
(b)
f (MHz)
0.5 1 1.5
Figure 5.1: Determinant of (a) the coefficient matrix X arising from the modal
equations, (b) the real symmetric matrix X ∗ X and (c) the Tikhonov regularised
matrix X ∗ X + µI with µ = 2 × 10−3 versus frequency f (MHz) for device C (See
Tables 2.1, 3.1 and 5.1 for material properties).
The effects of Tikhonov regularisation are shown for a 2-2 composite in Fig-
ure 5.1 for N = 3, M = 0. Ill-conditioning in the determinant calculation is
indicated by the noise in plot (a) which corresponds to no regularisation being
used. A major improvement can already be seen by making the matrix real and
symmetric in plot (b). However the introduction of the small parameter µ re-
sults in the smooth curve in plot (c). Truncated Singular Value Decomposition
[37] was also investigated but proved to be not as robust as Tikhonov regular-
isation in this instance. The algorithm for obtaining a particular mode for the
2-2 composite design sets k1 to a real number (initially) and then searches the
cost function surface in the frequency direction until a number of local minima
are found. These interim minima are used as the initial values for a search in
the direction of the imaginary part of k1 , although here the algorithm stops at
the first local minimum. This orthogonal stepping procedure is then performed
for a range of k1 values.
108
σ6
log |X ∗ X + µI|
σ4
-20
σ1
-25
-35
f (MHz)
0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5
Figure 5.2: Determinant of the coefficient matrix arising from the modal equa-
tions versus frequency f (MHz) for device C.
As can be seen in Figure 5.2 the surface given by log |X ∗ X = µI| has many
local minima. Some of these are very localised and do not represent actual
modes but are an artefact of the numerical computations. To help identify such
modes, the distance σi between adjacent maxima which straddle each minima
(see Figure 5.2) is calculated. Each point can then be shaded in the dispersion
curves according to the size of σ, or alternatively the magnitude of the imaginary
part of k1 can also be used (see Section 5.4.2).
5.4 Results
The effects of incorporating loss into the PWE method are investigated here. Pri-
marily, a comparison is made to the LSM model and the PWE method without
loss for a 2-2 composite (Section 5.4.1) Admittance plots and a modal analysis
using displacement and Poynting vector profiles are used to discuss the operat-
109
Device A B C
Composite type 2-2 1-3 2-2
Ceramic PZT5H PZT5H PZT5H
Thickness (mm) (h) 3.83 2.4 2
Kerf (mm) 0.23 0.2 0.6
Saw pitch (mm) (p) 0.69 0.49 2
The introduction of loss into the PWE method serves to smooth out the
frequency domain response of the transducer and to lessen the effects of ill-
conditioning. Plot (a) in Figure 5.3 highlights the effect of introducing loss
log |ZT | log |ZT |
10
10
8
8
6 6
4 4
(a) (b)
Figure 5.3: The logarithm of the absolute value of the electrical impedance ZT
for device C plotted against the driving frequency f (MHz). In Plot (a), the solid
and dashed lines represent the PWE method with and without loss respectively.
In Plot (b), the solid and dashed lines represent the PWE and LSM methods
with loss respectively.
into the PWE method. Both the loss and no loss cases have similar signatures
110
at low frequencies but, as the loss becomes more pronounced, the higher fre-
quency oscillations are damped. The PWE method is then compared to the
LSM method in plot (b) of Figure 5.3. The LSM method predicts the thick-
ness mode response to be in the same region as the PWE method but, since
the LSM method is one-dimensional, no additional Lamb modes or inter/intra
pillar modes are present. Hence the LSM method is a useful tool which can
be used to quickly find where the thickness mode response will occur within
a new transducer, before beginning an extensive investigation using the PWE
method. Extending this analysis to a range of electrical excitation wavenumbers
0 0
k1 p10.2 k1 p10.2
2π 2π
0.4 0.4
(a) (b)
Figure 5.4: The logarithm of the absolute value of the electrical impedance ZT
for device C with (a) no loss and (b) loss, plotted against the nondimensionalised
wavenumber k1 p1 /2π (expressed in fractions of the wavelength) and the driving
frequency f (MHz).
0.1
0.2
k 1 p1
2π
0.3
0.4
0.5
PSfrag replacements 0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0 0.5 1 1.5 0 Y
f
Figure 5.5: The conductance Y for device C (normalised) with loss, plotted
against the nondimensionalised wavenumber k1 p1 /2π (expressed in fractions of
the wavelength) and the driving frequency f (MHz).
|u1 | |u3 |
1
0.05
0.8
0.04
0.6
0.03 PSfrag replacements
0.4
PSfrag replacements 0.02
0.01 0.2
|u1 |
-1 1
x1 x1
-3 -2 2 3 -3 -2 -1 1 2 3
(a) (b)
PSfrag replacements |u3 |
|u1 | 1
PSfrag replacements x1
0.0001 0.8
x1 |u1 |
0.00008
0.6
|u1 | |u3 |
0.00006
0.4
|u3 | 0.00004
0.2
x3 |u1 |
0.5 1 1.5 2
1 1.5
x3
PSfrag replacements 0.5 2
x(c)
1 (d)
|u1 |
x3
|u3 | 2.5
2
x3
1.5
|u1 |
1
|u3 |
PSfrag replacements 0.5
x1 x1
-4 -2 2 4
|u1 | -0.5
|u3 | (e)
x3
x3
|u1 | 2.5
|u3 | 2
1.5
x1
1
x3
0.5
x1
-4 -2 2 4
-0.5
(f)
Figure 5.6: Normalised displacement (ui ) of device C (k1 = 1500 + m−1 and
f = 0.65 MHz) using the PWE method incorporating loss at the thickness mode.
Plots (a) and (b) show the components of the displacement on the transducer
surface x3 = 0, as x1 is varied , (c) and (d) show the components of the dis-
placement as x3 is varied (at x1 = 0) and (e) and (f) are the real part of the
displacement in the x3 -x1 plane x2 = 0. Plot (e) is at time t0 and (f) is at time
t0 plus half the period (the displacements have been scaled to accentuate the
motion).
113
x3
1.5
0.5
PSfrag replacements
0
x1
-0.05 -0.04 -0.03 -0.02 -0.01
(a)
x3
2
1.5
0.5
PSfrag replacements
0
x1
0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.3
(b)
Figure 5.7: Displacement (real part) (u) of device C (k1 = 1500 + m−1 and
f = 0.6478 MHz) using the PWE method incorporating loss at the thickness
mode during excitation. Plot (a) illustrates the movement of specific points
within the ceramic as time is varied and (b) illustrates the movement of specific
points over time within the polymer (the displacements have been scaled to
accentuate the motion and the scaling in the x1 direction is not identical in each
diagram).
114
|P1 | |P3 |
0.7
0.6
0.015
0.5
(a) (b)
|P1 | x3
2.5
|P3 |
2
x3 1.5
|P1 | 1
|P3 | 0.5
PSfrag replacements
x1
x1 -4 -2 2 4
-0.5
|P1 |
|P3 | (e)
x3 x3
2.5
|P1 |
2
|P3 |
1.5
x1 1
x3 0.5
x1
-4 -2 2 4
-0.5
(f)
Figure 5.8: Normalised Poynting vector (Pj ) of device C (k1 = 1500 + m−1 and
f = 0.6478 MHz) using the PWE method incorporating loss at the thickness
mode. Plots (a) and (b) show the components of the Poynting vector on the
transducer surface x3 = 0, as x1 is varied, (c) and (d) show the components of
the Poynting vector as x3 is varied (at x1 = 0) and (e) and (f) are the real part
of the in-plane Poynting vector in the x3 -x1 plane x2 = 0. Plot (e) is at time t0
and (f) is at time t0 plus half the period (the Poynting vector has been scaled
to accentuate the motion).
116
|u1 | |u3 |
x1
-3 -2 -1 1 2 3
0.07
0.8
0.06
0.05 PSfrag replacements 0.6
PSfrag replacements 0.04
0.4
0.03 |u1 |
x1 0.2
-3 -2 -1 1 2 3
(a) (b)
-4 4
x1
-2 2
-0.5
(f)
x3
2.5
1.5
0.5
PSfrag replacements 0
-0.5 x1
-0.1 0 0.1 0.2
(a)
x3
1.5
0.5
PSfrag replacements 0
x1
0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4
(b)
Figure 5.10: Displacement (real part) (u) of device C (k1 = 1500 + m−1 and
f = 0.1178 MHz) using the PWE method incorporating loss at the first anti-
symmetrical Lamb mode during excitation. Plot (a) illustrates the movement
of specific points within the ceramic as time is varied and (b) illustrates the
movement of specific points over time within the polymer (the displacements
have been scaled to accentuate the motion and the scaling in the x1 direction is
not identical in each diagram).
118
|P1 | |P3 |
0.07 1
0.06
0.8
0.05
0.04 0.6
PSfrag replacements
0.03 0.4
PSfrag replacements
0.02
0.2
0.01 |P1 |
x1 x1
-3 -2 -1 1 2 3 -3 -2 -1 1 2 3
(a) (b)
|P1 | PSfrag replacements |P3 |
PSfrag replacements 0.05 x1 0.12
x1 0.04 |P1 | 0.1
0.08
|P1 | 0.03 |P3 |
0.06
|P3 | 0.02 0.04
0.01 |P1 | 0.02
x3 x3
0.5 1 1.5 2 0.5 1 1.5 2
PSfrag replacements
(c) x (d)
1
|P1 | x3
2.5
|P3 |
2
x3
1.5
|P1 |
1
|P3 | 0.5
PSfrag replacements
x1
x1 -4 -2 2 4
-0.5
|P1 |
|P3 | (e)
x3 x3
2.5
|P1 |
2
|P3 |
1.5
x1 1
x3 0.5
-4 4
x1
-2 2
-0.5
(f)
Figure 5.11: Normalised Poynting vector (Pj ) of device C using the PWE method
incorporating loss (k1 = 1500 + m−1 and f = 0.1178 MHz) at the first anti-
symmetrical Lamb mode. Plots (a) and (b) show the components of the Poynting
vector on the transducer surface x3 = 0, as x1 is varied, (c) and (d) show the
components of the Poynting vector as x3 is varied (at x1 = 0) and (e) and (f)
are the real part of the Poynting vector in the x3 -x1 plane x2 = 0. Plot (e) is at
time t0 and (f) is at time t0 plus half the period (the Poynting vector has been
scaled to accentuate the motion).
120
|u1 | |u3 |
0.15
0.35
0.125
0.3 0.1
PSfrag replacements
0.075
0.25
PSfrag replacements 0.05
x1
-3 -2 -1 1 2 3 |u1 | 0.025
0.15 -1 1
x1
-3 -2 2 3
(a) (b)
|u1 | x3
2.5
|u3 |
2
x3 1.5
|u1 | 1
|u3 | 0.5
PSfrag replacements
x1
x1 -4 -2 2 4
-0.5
|u1 |
|u3 | (e)
x3 x3
2.5
|u1 |
2
|u3 |
1.5
x1 1
x3 0.5
x1
-4 -2 2 4
-0.5
(f)
Figure 5.12: Normalised displacement (ui ) of device C (k1 = 1500 + m−1 and
f = 0.2133 MHz) using the PWE method incorporating loss at a Rayleigh mode.
Plots (a) and (b) show the components of the displacement on the transducer
surface x3 = 0, as x1 is varied, (c) and (d) show the components of the displace-
ment as x3 is varied (at x1 = 0) and (e) and (f) are the real part of the in-plane
displacement in the x3 -x1 plane x2 = 0. Plot (e) is at time t0 and (f) is at time
t0 plus half the period (the displacements have been scaled to accentuate the
motion).
121
x3
2
1.5
0.5
PSfrag replacements
0
x1
-0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.1
(a)
x3
1.5
0.5
PSfrag replacements
0
x1
0.85 0.9 0.95 1 1.05 1.1
(b)
Figure 5.13: Displacement (real part) (u) of device C (k1 = 1500 + m−1 and
f = 0.2133 MHz) using the PWE method incorporating loss at a Rayleigh mode
during excitation. Plot (a) illustrates the movement of specific points within the
ceramic as time is varied and (b) illustrates the movement of specific points over
time within the polymer (the displacements have been scaled to accentuate the
motion and the scaling in the x1 direction is not identical in each diagram).
motion is predominately in the x3 direction near the top face of the transducer.
Figure 5.13 suggests that the ceramic phase moves anti-clockwise, with essen-
tially only lateral motion near the bottom face, with an increasing x3 component
nearer the top face. The polymer moves anti-clockwise, again predominantly
in the lateral direction, with a switch in the direction of rotation at around
x3 = 0.75 mm. Examination of the Poynting vector in Figure 5.14 shows that
all the energy is near the top face of the transducer and this is symptomatic of
a Rayleigh wave.
123
|P1 | |P3 |
0.08 0.05
0.06 0.04
x1 x1
-3 -2 -1 1 2 3 -3 -2 -1 1 2 3
(a) (b)
|P1 | PSfrag replacements |P3 |
0.08 1
PSfrag replacements x1
0.8
x1 0.06 |P1 |
0.6
|P1 | 0.04 |P3 |
0.4
|P3 |
0.02
0.2
|P1 |
x3 x3
0.5 1 1.5 2 0.5 1 1.5 2
PSfrag replacements
(c) x (d)
1
|P1 | 2.5
|P3 | 2
x3 1.5
|P1 | 1
|P3 | 0.5
PSfrag replacements
x1 -4 -2 2 4
x1
x3 -0.5
|P1 |
|P3 | (e)
x3 2.5
|P1 | 2
|P3 | 1.5
x1 1
x3 0.5
x1 -4 -2 2 4
x3 -0.5
(f)
Figure 5.14: Normalised Poynting vector (Pj ) of device C (k1 = 1500 + m−1
and f = 0.2133 MHz) using the PWE method incorporating loss at a Rayleigh
mode. Plots (a) and (b) show the components of the Poynting vector on the
transducer surface x3 = 0, as x1 is varied, (c) and (d) show the components of
the Poynting vector as x3 is varied (at x1 = 0) and (e) and (f) are the real part
of the Poynting vector in the x3 -x1 plane x2 = 0. Plot (e) is at time t0 and
(f) is at time t0 plus half the period (the Poynting vector has been scaled to
accentuate the motion).
124
Investigating the displacements shown in Figure 5.15 it can be seen that the
motion is predominantly in the polymer phase. The overall motion shows the
ceramic phase being stretched and squashed, at alternating faces of the trans-
ducer (i.e. in a flexural motion). Figure 5.16 highlights that the ceramic and
polymer phases move in opposite directions from one another, mainly in the lat-
eral direction. Figure 5.17 shows that the energy is dominant within the ceramic
phases in the lateral direction, away from the surfaces of the transducer. The
evidence all suggests that the motion is being driven by the flexural response of
the ceramic pillar and so this mode is categorised as an intra-pillar mode.
125
|u1 | |u3 |
1
0.4
0.8
0.3
0.6 PSfrag replacements
PSfrag replacements 0.4 0.2
0.2
|u1 | x1
-3 -2 -1 1 2 3
-1 1
x1
-3 -2 2 3
(a) (b)
x3 1
0.5
x1
-4 -2 2 4
-0.5
(f)
Figure 5.15: Normalised displacement (ui ) of device C (k1 = 1500 + m−1 and
f = 0.1.09 MHz) using the PWE method incorporating loss at the intra-pillar
mode . Plots (a) and (b) show the components of the displacement on the
transducer surface x3 = 0, as x1 is varied, (c) and (d) show the components
of the displacement as x3 is varied (at x1 = 0) and (e) and (f) is the real part
of the in-plane displacement in the x3 -x1 plane x2 = 0. Plot (e) is at time t0
and (f) is at time t0 plus half the period (the displacements have been scaled to
accentuate the motion).
126
x3
1.5
0.5
PSfrag replacements
0
x1
-0.05 -0.04 -0.03 -0.02 -0.01
(a)
x3
2
1.5
0.5
PSfrag replacements
0
x1
0.85 0.95 1.05 1.15
(b)
Figure 5.16: Displacement (real part) (|u|) of device C (k1 = 1500 + m−1 and
f = 0.1.09 MHz) using the PWE method incorporating loss at the intra-pillar
mode during excitation. Plot (a) illustrates the movement of specific points
within the ceramic as time is varied and (b) illustrates the movement of specific
points over time within the polymer (the displacements have been scaled to
accentuate the motion and the scaling in the x1 direction is not identical in each
diagram).
127
|P1 | |P3 |
1
0.03
0.8
0.025
0.6 0.02
PSfrag replacements
0.015
0.4
PSfrag replacements 0.01
0.2
|P1 | 0.005
x1 x1
-3 -2 -1 1 2 3 -3 -2 -1 1 2 3
(a) (b)
|P1 | PSfrag replacements |P3 |
PSfrag replacements 0.025 x1 0.0175
0.02 0.015
x1 |P1 |
0.0125
|P1 | 0.015 |P3 | 0.01
0.0075
|P3 | 0.01
0.005
0.005
|P1 | 0.0025
x3 x3
0.5 1 1.5 2 0.5 1 1.5 2
PSfrag replacements
(c) x (d)
1
|P1 | 2.5
|P3 | 2
x3 1.5
|P1 | 1
|P3 | 0.5
PSfrag replacements
x1 -4 -2 2 4
x1
x3 -0.5
|P1 |
|P3 | (e)
x3 2.5
|P1 | 2
|P3 | 1.5
x1 1
x3 0.5
x1 -4 -2 2 4
x3 -0.5
(f)
Figure 5.17: Normalised Poynting vector (Pj ) of device C (k1 = 1500 + m−1
and f = 0.1.09 MHz) using the PWE method incorporating loss at the intra-
pillar mode. Plots (a) and (b) show the components of the Poynting vector on
the transducer surface x3 = 0, as x1 is varied, (c) and (d) show the components
of the Poynting vector as x3 is varied (at x1 = 0) and (e) and (f) are the real
part of the Poynting vector in the x3 -x1 plane x2 = 0. Plot (e) is at time t0
and (f) is at time t0 plus half the period (the Poynting vector has been scaled
to accentuate the motion).
128
One of the main problems, which is due to the the architecture of a 1-3 or 2-2
composite transducer, is the presence of parasitic waves. These are generated
between adjacent pillars (inter-pillar modes) or within the pillars (intra-pillar
modes), interfering with the piston like behaviour of the fundamental thickness
mode [24]. Extensive experimental observations have highlighted the intricate
dependency between the geometry of the design, the material properties and
the key operational characteristics of the device. It has been suggested that a
passive material with a low transverse coupling would enhance the transducer’s
efficiency [24, 23]. By introducing high shear loss these parasitic waves will
hopefully be damped and crosstalk within the pillars should be reduced. In this
section the effects of introducing a high shear loss polymer are investigated using
dispersion diagrams and electrical impedance profiles. The model is based on
device C (see Table 5.1), which was discussed in the the previous section, with
a parameter ζ scaling the shear attenuation coefficient αs .
Figures 5.18 and 5.19 contrast the dispersion curves for a passive phase with
low shear loss (ζ = 1) to that with a high shear loss (ζ = 10), for the homoge-
neous case (N=0). Plots (c) and (d) have been coloured according to the size of
the imaginary part of the wavenumber (k1 ) with the red shades corresponding
to the highly attenuated modes. Plots (e) and (f) have been shaded according
to the width (σ) of the minima found in the determinant calculations with the
blue shades being the widest. Plots (c) and (d) suggest that the imaginary part
of k1 for most of the modes are of similar size. Plots (e) and (f) show that σ is
small except for the mode with the lowest phase velocity (highlighted in Figure
5.19). For low shear attenuation in the passive phase the width of the band
gaps around the thickness mode are 0.35 MHz below and 0.42 MHz above at
k1 = 0.106 mm−1 . For high shear attenuation the band gap widens to 0.39 MHz
below and 0.43 MHz above the thickness mode. It can be seen that by intro-
129
f (MHz) f (MHz)
2 2
1.75 1.75
1.5 1.5
1.25 1.25
1 1
PSfrag replacements 0.75 PSfrag replacements 0.75
0.5 thickness mode 0.5 thickness mode
0.25 0.25
1 4 5
k1 (mm−1 ) 1 4 5
k1 (mm−1 )
2 3 2 3
(a) ζ = 1 (b) ζ = 10
f (MHz) f (MHz)
2 2
1.75 1.75
1.5 1.5
1.25 1.25
1 1
PSfrag replacements 0.75 PSfrag replacements 0.75
0.5 thickness mode 0.5 thickness mode
0.25 0.25
k1 (mm−1 ) k1 (mm−1 )
1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
(c) ζ = 1 (d) ζ = 10
f (MHz) f (MHz)
2 2
1.75 1.75
1.5 1.5
1.25 1.25
1 1
PSfrag replacements 0.75 PSfrag replacements 0.75
0.5 thickness mode 0.5 thickness mode
0.25 0.25
k1 (mm−1 ) k1 (mm−1 )
1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
(e) ζ = 1 (f) ζ = 10
ducing high shear loss many of the modes have been damped so that a larger
band gap is found around the thickness mode.
Figures 5.20 and 5.21 show a similar analysis for the heterogeneous case
(N=3). As before plots (c) and (d) and have been shaded according to the
130
vp (ms−1 ) vp (ms−1 )
6000 6000
5000 5000
4000 4000
PSfrag replacements s0 PSfrag replacements s0
3000 3000
2000 2000
1000 bulk waves 1000 bulk waves
a0 a0
1 1.5
f × h (kHzm) 1 1.5
f × h (kHzm)
0.5 2 2.5 3 0.5 2 2.5 3
(a) ζ = 1 (b) ζ = 10
vp (ms ) −1
6000
5000 vp (ms−1 )
6000
4000 5000
PSfrag replacements s0 PSfrag replacements
3000 4000
3000 s0
2000
2000
1000 bulk waves 1000 bulk waves
a0 a0
f × h (kHzm) f × h (kHzm)
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
(c) ζ = 1 (d) ζ = 10
vp (ms−1 ) vp (ms−1 )
6000 6000
5000 5000
4000 4000
PSfrag replacements s0 PSfrag replacements s0
3000 3000
2000 2000
1000 bulk waves 1000 bulk waves
a0 a0
f × h (kHzm) f × h (kHzm)
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
(e) ζ = 1 (f) ζ = 10
Figure 5.19: Phase velocity (vp ) versus frequency (f ) × thickness (h) product
for device C (homogenous) with low shear attenuation in the passive phases
(ζ = 1) and high shear attenuation in the passive phase (ζ = 10). Plots (a)
and (b) have no colour, (c) and (d) are coloured with respect to the size of the
imaginary part of the wavenumber k1 and (e) and (f) are coloured with respect
to the ’size’ of the minima (σ) of the determinant as defined above.
size of the imaginary part of the wavenumber (k1 ) whilst plots (e) and (f) have
been shaded according to the width of the minima (σ) found in the determinant
calculations. Plots (c) and (d) indicate that the low frequency modes are more
attenuative than the higher frequency modes such as the thickness mode. Plots
131
f (MHz) f (MHz)
2 2
1.75 1.75
1.5 1.5
1.25 thickness mode 1.25 thickness mode
1 1
PSfrag replacements 0.75 PSfrag replacements 0.75
0.5 0.5
0.25 0.25
k1 (mm−1 ) k1 (mm−1 )
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
(a) ζ = 1 (b) ζ = 10
f (MHz) f (MHz)
2 2
1.75 1.75
1.5 1.5
1.25 thickness mode 1.25 thickness mode
1 1
PSfrag replacements 0.75 PSfrag replacements 0.75
0.5 0.5
0.25 0.25
k1 (mm−1 ) k1 (mm−1 )
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
(c) ζ = 1 (d) ζ = 10
f (MHz) f (MHz)
2 2
1.75 1.75
1.5 1.5
1.25 thickness mode 1.25 thickness mode
1 1
PSfrag replacements 0.75 PSfrag replacements 0.75
0.5 0.5
0.25 0.25
k1 (mm−1 ) k1 (mm−1 )
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
(e) ζ = 1 (f) ζ = 10
(e) and (f) show that σ is large for the thickness mode and small for the lower
frequency modes. The thickness mode is more isolated in Figure 5.20 compared
to Figure 5.18 so it is easily identified. By observing Figure 5.21 to it is difficult
to identify the important modes which were seen clearly in Figure 5.19. This is
132
vp (ms−1 ) vp (ms−1 )
2000 2000
1750 1750
1500 1500
PSfrag replacements 1250 PSfrag replacements 1250
1000 1000
750 750
500 500
a0 a0
250 250
s0 s0
f × h (kHzm) f × h (kHzm)
bulk waves 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 bulk waves 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
(a) ζ = 1 (b) ζ = 10
vp (ms )
−1
vp (ms )
−1
6000 6000
5000 5000
4000 4000
PSfrag replacements PSfrag replacements
3000 3000
2000 2000
a0 1000 a0 1000
s0 s0
f × h (kHzm) f × h (kHzm)
bulk waves 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 bulk waves 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
(c) ζ = 1 (d) ζ = 10
vp (ms−1 ) vp (ms−1 )
6000 6000
5000 5000
4000 4000
PSfrag replacements PSfrag replacements
3000 3000
2000 2000
a0 1000 a0 1000
s0 s0
f × h (kHzm) f × h (kHzm)
bulk waves 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 bulk waves 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
(e) ζ = 1 (f) ζ = 10
Figure 5.21: Phase velocity (vp ) versus frequency (f ) × thickness (h) product
for device C (heterogeneous) with low shear attenuation in the passive phases
(ζ = 1) and high shear attenuation in the passive phase (ζ = 10). Plots (a)
and (b) have no colour, (c) and (d) are coloured with respect to the size of the
imaginary part of the wavenumber k1 and (e) and (f) are coloured with respect
to the ’size’ of the minima (σ) of the determinant as defined above.
due in part to the additional modes which arise in the heterogeneous case caused
by the inter-pillar and intra-pillar length scales. For a low shear attenuation in
the passive phase the width of the band gaps around the thickness mode are
0.18 MHz below and 0.58 MHz above at k1 = 0.406 mm−1 . For high shear
133
attenuation the band gap widens to 0.63 MHz below and more than 0.94 MHz
above the thickness mode. This shows that by introducing a high shear loss
passive phase, the thickness mode operates over a wider bandwidth.
G
0.5
0.3
a0 mode
0.2 interpillar mode
PSfrag replacements
0.1
f (MHz)
0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5
20
PSfrag replacements 10
7.5
|ZT | 5
2.5
0
0 0.5 1 1.5
f
larly in identifying the guided wave modes of low order. An alternative approach
is to utilise the electrical behaviour of the transducer to plot these curves.
The electrical conductance of the transducer is plotted as a function of fre-
quency in Figure 5.22. Subsequent analysis of the field equations show that the
thickness mode is at f = 0.65 MHz and the first antisymmetric Lamb wave (a0
mode) is at f = 0.12 MHz. When high shear loss is introduced it is apparent
that there is a damping effect on all modes except the thickness mode. In fact
the magnitude of the conductance at the thickness mode has slightly increased
when the high shear attenuation polymer is used. This may be due to unwanted
lateral modes at this frequency being damped out thus allowing the transducer
to more effectively operate in the desired thickness mode. Figure 5.23 shows
the high shear loss gradually taking effect in a plot of the absolute value of the
electrical impedance of the transducer as a function of the driving frequency and
the degree of shear attenuation in the passive phase. The aim is to damp out
any unwanted modes around the electrical resonant frequency fe = 0.65 MHz,
which corresponds to the thickness mode (the mechanical resonant frequency is
fm = 0.85 MHz). From the impedance curve it is clear that as ζ is increased
both the Lamb modes and intra/interpillar modes are being damped.
Note that the thickness mode in Figure 5.20 is predicted to be at a higher
frequency than Figure 5.22. To produce the dispersion diagram in Figure 5.20,
the system of equations XAr = 0 are solved by calculating the determinant of X.
In order to achieve this Tikhonov regularisation (see section 5.3), which shifts the
solution to cope with the numerical instabilities as the determinant approaches
zero, is used. The dispersion diagrams have been shifted and the results give
an approximate representation of where the modes will occur in respect to each
other. However, one advantage of this method is that the imaginary part of
the wavenumber k1 can be calculated. The results in Figure 5.22 are found by
solving a system of equations of the form XAr = Q. This gives an accurate
135
description of where the modes will occur but the imaginary part of k1 has to
be defined.
Z (kΩ) Z (kΩ)
80 80
60 60
40 40
f (MHz) f (MHz)
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
(a) (b)
Z (kΩ) Z (kΩ)
80 80
60 60
40 40
f (MHz) f (MHz)
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
(c) (d)
Z (kΩ) Z (kΩ)
80 80
60 60
40 40
f (MHz) f (MHz)
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
(e) (f)
Figure 5.24: Electrical impedance characteristics for device A using the isotropic
PWE method (solid line in plots (a), (c) and (e)), FE modelling (solid line in
plots (b), (d) and (f)) and the anisotropic PWE method (dashed line) with
polymer phase (a) hardset, (b) softset, (c) HP20, (d) SBS1, (e) SBS2 and (f)
SBS4.
cates that this is spurious. The introduction of the SBS material in plots (d),
(e) and (f) demonstrates that these unwanted low frequency Lamb modes can
be damped down whilst maintaining a reasonable fundamental thickness mode
response magnitude. The PWE method has good agreement with the FE mod-
elling on the location of the modes in plots (d), (e) and (f), however the model
overpredicts the magnitude of these modes. Modal analysis found the additional
137
lower frequency mode in plot (f) to be spurious. The important point to note is
that this enhancement of the device performance is predicted in a similar fash-
ion by both modelling techniques. So although the PWE method has difficulty
here in the quantitative prediction of the impedance magnitude, the qualitative
improvements in performance are still evident.
vp (ms−1 )
4000
3000
PSfrag replacements s0
2000
Loadlines
1000
Bulk waves
a0 f (MHz)
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Figure 5.25: Phase velocity (vp ) versus frequency (f ) × thickness (h) product
for device B using the PWE method (triangles), FE modelling (squares) and
experimental data (solid line). The long and short dashed lines represent the
bulk modes and loadlines respectively
138
x3
2.5
1.5
x1
-1 -0.5 0.5 1
(a)
2.5
1.5
PSfrag replacements
0.5
x1
x3 -1 -0.5 0.5 1
(b)
Figure 5.26: The real part of the in-plane displacement in the x3 -x1 plane at
x2 = 0 for the a0 mode of device B. Plots (a) and (b) show the two extremes of
the periodic motion (f = 0.406 MHz)
139
x3
2.5
1.5
0.5
PSfrag replacements
0
x1
0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35
|P |
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
PSfrag replacements
0.1
0.05
x3
0.6 1.2 1.8 2.4
adjacent pillars and diagonally opposite pillars, and are displayed as constant
wavelength loadlines in the dispersion diagram. As such the loadlines should
appear as straight lines in this dispersion diagram. The slight deviations from
linearity which occur in Figure 5.25 are indicative of the accuracy of the method
in locating these modes. The deviation is about 5 per cent and this gives a rough
measure of the accuracy of the method. There is good agreement between all
three sets of results although the FE model predicts a larger frequency range
for the a0 mode than was observed experimentally. It should be borne in mind
however that the PWE method is computationally less intensive than the FE
model and its strength lies in providing a fast, qualitative prediction of the
transducer’s characteristics.
The number of Fourier coefficients used in the PWE method plays an analo-
gous role to that of the spatial discretisation used in the FE analysis. The bal-
ance between computational cost and model accuracy can therefore be controlled
in both methods. The accuracy can be gauged by comparison with experimental
data and by examining the convergence of the model predictions as the compu-
tational complexity is increased. A systematic study of the convergence of the
PWE method and its dependency on the number of Fourier coefficients has not
yet been conducted. Comparing the computational cost of the two methods is
difficult at present for the following reasons. The FE analysis conducted used a
commercial code which has been highly optimised for computational efficiency
[58] whereas the PWE method was implemented using a bespoke, suboptimal
coding. The FE analysis is for a transducer of finite lateral dimensions whereas
the PWE method is for a periodic composite of infinite lateral extent. Thus
reflections from the ends of the plate are included in the FE analysis and this
explains some of the differences. A quantitative comparison of the speed of each
method is therefore problematic at present. However, it is clear from these simu-
lations that the PWE method is at least an order of magnitude faster, although
141
MHz away from the fm and a lower frequency mode is introduced. In addition,
the magnitude of the fm will decrease. The imaginary part of k1 is 0.3 times the
real part, so as k1 increases, the effects of damping become more apparent.
0
0.1
k1 p10.2
2π
0.3
0.4
PSfrag replacements
0.5
log |ZT |
0 0.5 1 1.5
f
(a)
Figure 5.29: The absolute value of the electrical impedance ZT for device C plot-
ted against the nondimensionalised wavenumber k1 p1 /2π (expressed in fractions
of the wavelength) and the driving frequency f (MHz).
5.7 Conclusions
The plane wave expansion (PWE) method is a frequency domain approach for
studying the modal behaviour of periodic piezoelectric composite transducers.
143
Z (kΩ) Z (kΩ)
80 80
60 60
40 40
f (MHz) f (MHz)
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
(a) (b)
Z (kΩ) Z (kΩ)
80 80
60 60
40 40
(c) (d)
Z (kΩ) Z (kΩ)
80 80
60 60
40 40
f (MHz) f (MHz)
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
(e) (f)
Figure 5.30: Electrical impedance characteristics for device A using the isotropic
PWE model (solid line in plots (a), (c) and (e)), FE modelling (solid line in plots
(b), (d) and (f)) and the anisotropic PWE method (dashed line) with polymer
phase (a) SBS1 , (b) SBS1, (c) SBS2, (d) SBS2, (e) SBS4 and (f) SBS4.
It is shown in this chapter that the method can be extended to incorporate fre-
quency dependent loss in both phases. One advantage of this approach over time
domain methods is that information on low amplitude or high frequency modes
is retained. A strict comparison between the PWE and FE methods in terms
of computational cost and accuracy is difficult at present but it would appear
that the PWE method provides a more qualitative prediction at a fraction of
the computational time. One advantage of investigating piezoelectric compos-
144
Fractal Transducers
6.1 Introduction
In this chapter, the plane wave expansion model (PWE) is utilised to investi-
gate the behaviour of a transducer with a fractal architecture. The traditional
designs used in ultrasound transducers are very regular and have arisen due to
manufacturing constraints rather than performance optimisation. Many of these
restrictions no longer hold due to new manufacturing processes such as computer
controlled, laser cutting machines, and so there is now freedom to investigate
new types of geometry.
If we look to nature for inspiration then devices with irregular and self-
similar constructions may prove beneficial. Fractals for example are infinitely
complex and have a fine structure with detail at all scales. They are usually
self similar, with an irregular geometry which cannot be described in Euclidean
terms. Various types of fractals have provided an excellent representation of
natural objects such as clouds, snowflakes, mountains, lightning, trees and ferns
[61]. However, their use for ultrasonic transducer and array design has never
been investigated before.
In this chapter two systems which exhibit self-similarity, with their design
being built up iteratively from scaled versions of an original component part, are
investigated for their suitability as new transducer array designs [53]. Firstly
145
146
(a) (b)
the Cantor set, which is created by continually deleting the middle third of a set
of line segments in a unit interval, is utilised to design a 2-2 configuration, where
each new fractal generation level will introduce additional ceramic pillars into the
transducer (see Figure ?? (b)). Secondly a 1-3 configuration will be investigated
with a Sierpinski Carpet geometry (see Figure ??(a)). This structure is created
by removing a square of side length one third from the centre of a unit square,
then removing a square of side length one ninth from the remaining eight squares
and so on [18].
Although the analysis of wave propagation in fractal piezoelectric media has
never been attempted, the interest in wave propagation in fractal media has
given rise to various mathematical approaches [33, 36, 75, 63, 62, 64, 65, 18].
For example, previous studies have shown that reaction-diffusion travelling waves
can be supported by Sierpinski gasket pre-fractal lattices [3, 2].
where θ and φ are some physical property pertaining to the polymer and the
ceramic phase respectively, and % is the fractal generation level. This satisfies the
periodicity relationship M (x1 + p1 a, x2 + p2 b, %) = M (x1 , x2 , %), ∀ a, b Z where
p1 is the period of the geometry in the x1 direction and p2 is the period of the
geometry in the x2 direction. A Fourier series representation for the Sierpinski
carpet (1-3 configuration)(see Figure 6.2 can be written as,
∞
X ∞
X
%
M (x1 , x2 , %) = Mmn e−(2πmx1 +2πnx2 ) , (6.2)
m=−∞ n=−∞
and γ ={(1/6,1/6),(-1/6,1/6),(-1/2,1/6),(-1/2,-1/6),(-1/2,-1/2),(-1/6,-1/2),(1/6,-
1/2),(1/6,-1/6)}. T q corresponds to the co-ordinates of the bottom left hand
corner of each ceramic pillar and the translations of (1/2, 1/2) is used to facili-
tate the contraction of each pre-fractal in the first quadrant. For the Cantor set
geometry (2-2 configuration)(see Figure 6.2) the Fourier series is expressed as
∞
X
M (x, %) = Mn% e−(2πnx) , (6.6)
n=−∞
and S% simplifies to
% 2 q−1
[ [
S% = [T q (i, 1), T q (i, 1) + (1/3)q ], (6.7)
q=1 i=1
where (2q−2
3 )
[ [ 1 1
Tq = γi + Tjq−1 + , (6.8)
i=1 j=1
2 3
148
(a) % = 1 (b) % = 2
(c) % = 3
Figure 6.2: Plan view of one period of the Cantor set transducer design for the
first three generation levels. (The black material represents ceramic pillars and
the white material is the polymer.)
Z 1 Z 1
2 2
%
M (x1 , x2 , %)e2πmx1 +2πnx2 dx1 dx2 = Mmn , (6.9)
− 12 − 12
since Z 1
2
−2πbxi 0, for b Z, b 6= 0
e dxi = . (6.10)
− 21 1, for b = 0
149
(a) % = 1 (b) % = 2
(c) % = 3
Figure 6.3: Plan view of one period of the Sierpinski carpet transducer design
for the first three generation levels. (The black squares represents ceramic pillars
and the white material is the polymer.)
150
P%
Equation (6.9) is then split into q=1 8q−1 integrals to give for the Sierpinski
carpet
% 8q−1 T q (j,1)+(1/3)q T q (j,2)+(1/3)q
X X Z Z
%
Mmn = (φ − θ)e2π(mx1 +nx2 ) dx
q=1 j=1 T q (j,1) T q (j,2)
% Z 1 Z 1
!
X 2 2
q−1 2π(mx1 +nx2 )
+ 1/ 8 θe dx . (6.11)
q=1 − 12 − 12
Note the last term equals zero unless m = n = 0, in this case it equals
θ 7θ
P% = . (6.12)
q=1 8q−1 8% − 1
Hence the Fourier coefficients at fractal generation level % are given by
% (φ − θ) πm πn
Mmn = sin sin
π 2 mn 3q 3q
q q q q
× e(πm(2T (j,1)+(1/3) )+πn(2T (j,2)+(1/3) )) m, n = ±1, ±2, ..., (6.13)
% (φ − θ) 1 πn q (j,2)+(1/3)q ))
M0n = sin e(πn(2T n = ±1, ±2, ..., (6.14)
πn 3q 3q
% (φ − θ) 1 πm q (j,1)+(1/3)q ))
Mm0 = sin e(πm(2T m = ±1, ±2, ..., (6.15)
πm 3q 3q
and
φ−θ 7θ%
+ M00 =
. (6.16)
32q 8% − 1
For the Cantor set geometry, Equation (6.6) is multiplied on both sides by
e2πnx2 and integrated with respect to x2 from −1/2 to 1/2 to give
Z 1
2
M (x1 , %)e2πnx1 dx1 = Mn% . (6.17)
− 12
P%
Equation (6.17) is then split into q=1 2q−1 integrals to give
% 2q−1 T q (j,1)+(1/3)q
X X Z
Mn% = (φ − θ)e2πnx1 dx1
q=1 j=1 T q (j,1)
% Z 1
!
X 2
+ 1/ 2q−1 θe2πnx1 dx1 . (6.18)
q=1 − 12
151
As before, the last term equals zero unless n = 0, in this case it equals
θ θ
P% = . (6.19)
q=1 2q−1 2% −1
(φ − θ) πn q q
Mn% = sin q
e(πn(2T (j,1)+(1/3) )) n = ±1, ±2, ..., (6.20)
πn 3
and
φ−θ θ
M0% = q
+ % . (6.21)
3 2 −1
6.3 Results
In section 6.3.1 the electrical impedance and admittance characteristics of a
Cantor set composite transducer, with a standard hardset passive phase and
PZT5H ceramic (see Tables 3.1 and 2.1 for material properties ) are investi-
gated. The effects of the fractal generation level will be discussed and a modal
analysis will be performed to categorise any additional modes which arise due to
the fractal geometry. In section 6.3.2 the electrical impedance and admittance
characteristics of a Sierpinski carpet composite transducer using these materials
is similarly investigated. The lateral spatial periodicity is set as p1 = p2 = 1
mm and the thickness of the device is also h = 1 mm.
ceramic ceramic
1
9
polymer polymer 1 1 2 7
7 1 2
1 9 3 3 9
1
9 3 3
ceramic ceramic
polymer 1 1 2 7
polymer 1 1 2 7
9 3 3 9
1 9 3 3 9
1
(c) % = 3 (d) % = 4
Figure 6.4: Fourier approximation for the first four fractal generation levels of
the Cantor set. Plots (a), (b) and (c) have fifteen Fourier coefficients and plot
(d) has 40.
153
0 0
0.1 0.1
k 1 p1 0.2 k 1 p1 0.2
2π 2π
0.3 0.3
PSfrag replacements
0.4 0.4
PSfrag replacements
0.5
ZT Y
ZT
0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3
f f
(a) (b)
Figure 6.5: The absolute value of (a) the electrical impedance ZT (normalised)
and (b) the conductance Y (normalised) plotted against the nondimensionalised
electrode wavenumber k1 p1 /2π (expressed in fractions of the wavelength) and
the driving frequency f (MHz) with fractal generation level % = 1 for the Cantor
set transducer.
By examining the impedance profile in Figure 6.5 (a), the mechanical res-
onant frequency (fm ) is identified as the central ridge at around 2 MHz and
the electrical resonant frequency (fe ) as the minimum at around 1.5 MHz. The
electrical resonant frequency is also equivalent to the thickness mode within the
conductance plot in Figure 6.5 (b). To gauge the effect of the fractal geometry
on the behaviour of the device a comparison with the one dimensional Linear
Systems Model (LSM) [28] is conducted. Fractal generation level % = 1 corre-
sponds to the regular design shown in Figure 6.1(b). Comparison to the LSM
model in Figure 6.7 shows that there is good agreement between both methods
in the location of the modes (fm = 1.9 MHz) however the PWE model predicts
that the magnitude of the thickness mode response will be slightly smaller. As
the top electrode spacing varies from γ1 = 0 (that is a single, infinitely long top
electrode) to γ1 = 1/2 (each alternate ceramic pillar being excited by a voltage
that is shifted 180◦ out of phase (see Figure 6.6)), there is very little change in
the profile.
154
Top electrodes
Voltage
Figure 6.6: The top electrode spacing and an example applied voltage when
γ1 = k1 p1 /(2π) = 1/2.
ZT
40
30
20
PSfrag replacements
10
Figure 6.7: Absolute value of the electrical impedance ZT (kΩ) against fre-
quency f (Hertz) ×106 using the LSM method (dashed line) and the fractal
PWE method (solid line) with fractal generation level % = 1 for the Cantor set
transducer.
155
x1 x1
x3 x3
(a) (b)
Figure 6.8: The real part of the in-plane displacement in the x3 -x1 plane x2 = 0
( k1 = 157 + 15.7 m−1 , fe = 1.46 MHz and % = 1). Plot (a) is at time t0 and
(b) is at time t0 plus half the period (the displacements have been scaled to
accentuate the motion, the dark area is the ceramic and the lighter area is the
polymer). The electrical stimulus from the top electrode has a wavenumber of
k1 = 157 m−1 which corresponds to essentially a single electrode covering all the
ceramic pillars.
x1 x1
x3 x3
(a) (b)
Figure 6.9: The real part of the Poynting vector in the x3 -x1 plane x2 = 0
(k1 = 157 + 15.7 m−1 , fe = 1.46 MHz and % = 1). Plot (a) is at time t0 and
(b) is at time t0 plus half the period (the Poynting vector has been scaled to
accentuate the motion, the dark area is the ceramic and the lighter area is the
polymer).
0 0
0.1 0.1
k 1 p1 0.2 k 1 p1 0.2
2π 2π
0.3 0.3
PSfrag replacements
0.4 0.4
PSfrag replacements
0.5
ZT Y
ZT
0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3
f f
(a) (b)
Figure 6.10: The absolute value of (a) the electrical impedance ZT and (b)
the conductance Y plotted against the nondimensionalised wavenumber k1 p1 /2π
(expressed in fractions of the wavelength of the electrical excitation) and the
driving frequency f (MHz) for fractal generation level % = 2 for the Cantor set
transducer.
Figure 6.10 shows the absolute value of the electrical impedance and con-
ductance of the transducer as a function of the driving frequency and the nondi-
mensionalised wavenumber k1 p1 /2π for fractal generation level two. It is found
that as the spatial wavelength of the electrical excitation decreases (as k1 p1 /2π
increases), an additional mode is introduced. When k1 p1 /2π is small the top
157
30
20
PSfrag replacements
10
Figure 6.11: Absolute value of the electrical impedance ZT (kΩ) against fre-
quency f (Hertz) ×106 using the LSM method (dashed line) and the fractal
PWE method (solid line) for fractal generation level % = 2.
Comparison with the LSM model in Figure 6.11 suggests that the mechanical
resonant frequency is the second peak at 2 MHz.
x1 x1
x3 x3
(a) (b)
Figure 6.12: The real part of the in-plane displacement in the x3 -x1 plane x2 = 0
(k1 = 2983+298.3 m−1 , fe = 1.08 MHz and % = 2). Plot (a) is at time t0 and (b)
is at time t0 plus half the period (the displacements have been scaled to accentu-
ate the motion). Here the wavenumber for the electrical excitation corresponds
to each alternate generation level 1 ceramic pillar being phase opposed.
158
x1 x1
x3 x3
(a) (b)
Figure 6.13: The real part of the Poynting vector in the x3 -x1 plane x2 = 0
(k1 = 2983 + 298.3 m−1 , fe = 1.08 MHz and % = 2). Plot (a) is at time t0 and
(b) is at time t0 plus half the period (the Poynting vector has been scaled to
accentuate the motion).
By investigating the real part of the in-plane displacement in the x3 -x1 plane
x2 = 0 in Figure 6.12 for the lower frequency mode (fe = 1.08 MHz) it is found
that the level alternate % = 1 pillars are out of phase and the level % = 2
pillars, which arise from the new fractal generation level, are in phase with
the neighbouring level % = 1 pillar. The spatial periodicity in the electrical
excitation (k1 = 2983 m−1 ) corresponds to the generation level % = 1 pillars
being spaced at half the wavelength of this excitation. This accounts for the
adjacent level % = 1 pillars being phase opposed. The motion at the top and
bottom of the transducer is predominantly in the x3 direction, with only lateral
motion in the middle of the transducer. As the large pillars become tall and thin,
the smaller pillars are squashed inwards and as they become short, the smaller
pillars are pushed outwards. Figure 6.13 indicates that most of the energy is
spread throughout the pillar and polymer sections which arise from the second
generation level.
159
x1 x1
x3 x3
(a) (b)
Figure 6.14: The real part of the in-plane displacement in the x3 -x1 plane x2 = 0
(k1 = 2983 + 298.3 m−1 , fe = 1.72 MHz and % = 2). Plot (a) is at time t0 and
(b) is at time t0 plus half the period (the displacements have been scaled to
accentuate the motion).
x1 x1
x3 x3
(a) (b)
Figure 6.15: The real part of the Poynting vector in the x3 -x1 plane x2 = 0
(k1 = 2983 + 298.3 m−1 , fe = 1.72 MHz and % = 2). Plot (a) is at time t0 and
(b) is at time t0 plus half the period (the Poynting vector has been scaled to
accentuate the motion).
Modal analysis of the higher frequency mode ( the second minimum in Figure
6.11 at fe = 1.72 MHz) also shows a motion that is mainly in the vertical
direction. In contrast to the previous case, as the large pillars become tall, the
smaller pillars are now pushed outwards. Figure 6.15 indicates that the energy
is mainly at the faces of the transducer, particularly at the top face. It can be
seen that as x1 increases, damping will increase since the imaginary part of the
wavenumber is positive. Both of these modes show characteristics of a thickness
mode and the presence of two thickness modes has arisen due to the inclusion
160
0 0
0.1 0.1
k1 p10.2 k1 p10.2
2π 2π
0.3 0.3
0.4 0.4
PSfrag replacements PSfrag replacements
0.5
ZT ZT
0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3
f f
(a) (b)
Figure 6.16: The absolute value of (a) the electrical impedance ZT and (b)
the conductance Y plotted against the nondimensionalised wavenumber k1 p1 /2π
(expressed in fractions of the wavelength) and the driving frequency f (MHz)
for % = 3 for the Cantor set transducer.
30
20
PSfrag replacements
10
Figure 6.17: Absolute value of the electrical impedance ZT (kΩ) against fre-
quency f (Hertz) ×106 using the LSM method (dashed line) and the fractal
PWE method (solid line) with % = 3 (γ1 ≈ 0).
161
Comparison with the LSM method when k1 p1 /2π is small shows that there is
good agreement away from the resonant regions where there are now two modes
present in the PWE method.
x1 x1
x3 x3
(a) (b)
Figure 6.18: The real part of the in-plane displacement in the x3 -x1 plane x2 = 0
(k1 = 2983 + 298.3 m−1 , f = 0.63 MHz and % = 3). Plot (a) is at time t0 and
(b) is at time t0 plus half the period (the displacements have been scaled to
accentuate the motion).
x1 x1
x3 x3
(a) (b)
Figure 6.19: The real part of the Poynting vector in the x3 -x1 plane x2 = 0
(k1 = 2983 + 298.3 m−1 , f = 0.63 MHz and % = 3). Plot (a) is at time t0 and
(b) is at time t0 plus half the period (the Poynting vector has been scaled to
accentuate the motion).
x1 x1
x3 x3
(a) (b)
Figure 6.20: The real part of the in-plane displacement in the x3 -x1 plane x2 = 0
(k1 = 2983 + 298.3 m−1 , f = 1.14 MHz and % = 3). Plot (a) is at time t0 and
(b) is at time t0 plus half the period (the displacements have been scaled to
accentuate the motion).
x1 x1
x3 x3
(a) (b)
Figure 6.21: The real part of the Poynting vector in the x3 -x1 plane x2 = 0
(k1 = 2983 + 298.3 m−1 , f = 1.14 MHz and % = 3). Plot (a) is at time t0 and
(b) is at time t0 plus half the period (the Poynting vector has been scaled to
accentuate the motion).
Figure 6.20 illustrates the displacement of the second peak in Figure 6.16
(b). It is clear that the large pillars are out of phase from the small pillars and
that the mode is symmetric. As the large pillars become small the additional
pillars are shifted apart in the middle and squashed inwards at the faces of the
163
x1 x1
x3 x3
(a) (b)
Figure 6.22: The real part of the in-plane displacement in the x3 -x1 plane x2 = 0
(k1 = 2983 + 298.3 m−1 , f = 1.46 MHz and % = 3). Plot (a) is at time t0 and
(b) is at time t0 plus half the period (the displacements have been scaled to
accentuate the motion).
x1 x1
x3 x3
(a) (b)
Figure 6.23: The real part of the Poynting vector in the x3 -x1 plane x2 = 0
(k1 = 2983 + 298.3 m−1 , f = 1.46 MHz and % = 3). Plot (a) is at time t0
and (b) is at time t0 plus half the period(the Poynting vector has been scaled to
accentuate the motion).
of these is 180o out of phase. Figure 6.23 shows that, once again, the energy
is mainly at the faces, though there is energy throughout the higher generation
level pillars. By investigating the displacements shown in Figure 6.24 it can
be seen that the overall motion shows the ceramic phase being stretched and
squashed, at alternating faces of the transducer (i.e. in a flexural motion). Here
the largest pillars are out of phase from the two higher fractal generation level
pillars. Figure 6.25 shows that the energy is distributed along the top face of the
transducer.It appears that the motion is being driven by the flexural response
of the large ceramic pillar and so this mode can be categorised as an inter-pillar
mode.
x1 x1
x3 x3
(a) (b)
Figure 6.24: The real part of the in-plane displacement in the x3 -x1 plane x2 = 0
(k1 = 2983 + 298.3 m−1 , f = 2.43 MHz and % = 3). Plot (a) is at time t0 and
(b) is at time t0 plus half the period (the displacements have been scaled to
accentuate the motion).
165
x1 x1
x3 x3
(a) (b)
Figure 6.25: The real part of the in-plane displacement in the x3 -x1 plane x2 = 0
(k1 = 2983 + 298.3 m−1 , f = 2.43 MHz and % = 3) (the Poynting vector has
been scaled to accentuate the motion).
Y
1
0.8
0.6
0.2
Figure 6.26: Absolute value of the Electrical conductance YT (kΩ) against fre-
quency f (Hertz) ×106 using the fractal PWE method. The small dashed, large
dashed and full lines represent fractal generation % = 1, % = 2, and % = 3
respectively of the Cantor set transducer.
compromised.
In this section the Sierpinksi carpet (1-3 configuration) device shown in Fig-
ure ??(a) is investigated. Figure 6.27 illustrates the Fourier approximation
(N = M = 4) of an arbitrary material property for the first two fractal gener-
ation levels of the Sierpinski Carpet transducer where the height of the surface
represents the magnitude of the particular property. Plot (a) illustrates gener-
ation level one which corresponds to one central square ceramic pillar of side
length 1/3, plot (b) corresponds to generation level two; a generation one pillar
plus eight additional pillars of side length 1/9.
polymer polymer
ceramic
ceramic
PSfrag replacements PSfrag replacements
(a) % = 1 (b) % = 2
Figure 6.27: Fourier approximation for one spatial period of the first two fractal
generation levels of the Sierpinski Carpet transducer in the x1 − x2 plane (M =
N = 4).
167
0 0
0.1 0.1
k 1 p1 0.2 k 1 p1 0.2
2π 2π
0.3 0.3
PSfrag replacements
0.4 0.4
PSfrag replacements
0.5 0.5
ZT Y
ZT
0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3
f f
(a) (b)
Figure 6.28: The absolute value of (a) the electrical impedance ZT and (b)
the conductance Y plotted against the nondimensionalised electrode spacing
k1 p1 /2π (expressed in fractions of the wavelength) and the driving frequency f
(MHz) with fractal generation level % = 1 for the Sierpinski Carpet transducer.
Figure 6.29: Surface displacement for fractal generation level % = 1 for the
Sierpinski Carpet transducer over one period in time (k1 = 3140 + 314 m−1 and
fe = 1.24 MHz )(the displacements have been scaled to accentuate the motion).
0 0
0.1 0.1
k 1 p1 0.2 k 1 p1 0.2
2π 2π
0.3 0.3
PSfrag replacements
0.4 0.4
PSfrag replacements
0.5 0.5
ZT Y
ZT
0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3
f f
(a) (b)
Figure 6.30: The absolute value of (a) the electrical impedance ZT and (b) the
conductance Y for device C plotted against the nondimensionalised wavenumber
k1 p1 /2π (expressed in fractions of the wavelength of the electrical excitation)
and the driving frequency f (MHz) for fractal generation level % = 2 for the
Sierpinski Carpet transducer.
Introducing the next generation of ceramic pillars into the design we now
consider the generation % = 2 transducer. Figure 6.30 shows the absolute value
of the electrical impedance and conductance of the transducer as a function of the
driving frequency and the nondimensionalised wavenumber k1 p1 /2π. Once again
it is found that by introducing an extra fractal generation level an additional
mode is introduced, although the mode appears at a lower frequency (f < 1
MHz) and resembles a Lamb mode.
170
Figure 6.31: Surface displacement for fractal generation level % = 2 for the
Sierpinski Carpet transducer over one period in time (k1 = 3140 + 314 m−1 and
fe = 1.37 MHz )(the displacements have been scaled to accentuate the motion).
addition of the thin ceramic pillars in the heart of the polymer phase helps to
maintain the vertical displacement in these regions.
Figure 6.32: Surface displacement for fractal generation level % = 2 for the
Sierpinski Carpet transducer over one period in time (k1 = 3140 + 314 m−1 and
fe = 0.48 MHz )(the displacements have been scaled to accentuate the motion).
Lamb mode (s0 ). Higher generation levels of the Sierpinski carpet design could
in theory be investigated using the same methodology. However, in order to
resolve the horizontal dimensions of the ceramic pillars the number of Fourier
coefficients grows exponentially. This in turn leads to very large matrices and
prohibitively long computation times.
6.4 Conclusions
In general, ultrasonic transducers composed of a periodic piezoelectric compos-
ite realise better operational characteristics than single phase designs. The most
frequently used designs are manufactured by dicing the ceramic into a series of
pillars and then filling the void with a passive polymer phase. The architecture of
these devices are very regular and have arisen due to manufacturing constraints
rather than performance optimisation. However, many of these restrictions no
longer hold due to new manufacturing processes such as computer controlled,
laser cutting machines, and so there is now freedom to investigate new types of
geometry. Hence, in this chapter, devices with self-similar constructions have
been investigated. It has been shown that the plane wave expansion model
(PWE) can be utilised to investigate the behaviour of a composite piezoelectric
transducer with a fractal architecture. Of course, from a manufacturing per-
spective, it will only be possible to build fractal devices over a limited number
of generation levels. The effects of introducing up to three fractal generation
levels have been investigated for a Cantor set geometry transducer and a modal
analysis was performed to help explain its characteristics. It was found that
by increasing the fractal generation level, the bandwidth surrounding the main
thickness mode will increase, but there will be a corresponding reduction in the
displacement amplitude. The PWE method was also used to investigate the
effects of using a transducer with a Sierpinski Carpet geometry. It was found
in both fractal architectures (1-3 and 2-2 configurations) that by introducing
173
more fractal generation levels, additional modes will occur although those can
be isolated from the main thickness mode. The investigation of surface profiles
suggests that the inclusion of more fractal generation levels will minimise oscilla-
tion within the passive filler of the transducer. This will optimize the piston like
behaviour of the device. We have developed a model to examine the behaviour
of these devices and the next stage would be to use this model to optimise the
device performance in terms of the aspect ratio, the materials, the side length of
the ceramic pillar at each generation level and indeed other fractal geometries.
Chapter 7
Conclusions
174
175
[6] ANSYS Europe Ltd, 1st Floor Waterloo House, Riseley Business Park,
Riseley, Berkshire RG7 1NW United Kingdom.
[7] B. Auld, Acoustic Fields and Waves in Solids, John Wiley and Sons,
U.S.A., 1973.
178
179
[27] , Using a block diagram approach for the evaluation of electrical loading
effects on piezoelectric reception., Ultrasonics, 24 (1986), pp. 156–164.
181
[33] J. Kigami, Harmonic calculus on p.c.f. self-similar sets, Trans. AMS, 335
(1993), pp. 721–755.
[34] G. Kino, Acoustic Waves Devices, Imaging and Analogue Signal Process-
ing, Prentice-Hall, London, 1987.
[36] M. L. Lapidus, The vibrations of fractal drums and waves in fractal media,
Fractals in the Natural and Applied Sciences, 41 (1994), pp. 255–260.
[39] W. Magnus and S. Winkler, Hill’s Equation, New York, Dover, 1979.
[50] , Incorporation of viscoelastic loss into the plane wave expansion ap-
proach to modelling composite transducers., Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE
International Ultrasonics Symposium, (2006), pp. 472–475.
[61] M. Schroeder, Fractals, Chaos, Power Laws, W.H. Freeman and Com-
pany, 1991.
[63] , Extension theory for lattice green functions, Phys. Rev. B, 37 (1988),
pp. 9525–9542.
[65] , Explicit orbits for renormalisation maps for green functions on fractal
lattices, Phys. Rev. B, 47 (1993), pp. 7847–7858.
185