4 views

Uploaded by Premier Publishers

Underground Gravity Vertical Gradient is an important practice for prospecting underground densities, although in most cases it does not match the densities obtained directly in the laboratory from rock samples representative of the location. The densities of the laboratory samples were systematically lower when compared to the densities calculated by gravimetric determination suggesting some kind of systematic error. Several researchers propose different sources to explain these systematic errors including an anomalous value of the free-air vertical gradient. The anomalous value was admitted for the free-air vertical gradient in this paper to reinterpret the densities determination research made in a mine at Barberton, Ohio, in 1950, by gravimetric measurements and by laboratory rock samples. The results of both approaches reached similar densities agreeing with the free-air vertical gradient proposed.

- Primer (Mean, Standard Deviation)
- Torque
- Slee Ger Set Al 2013
- DMAIC - GRR Template.xlsx
- Tpi Documentation Online
- ap lab 00 - equations 20131
- The Population is the Set of Entities Under Study
- Hero Honda
- Icdcd Action Research
- 1-s2.0-S0191886917301125-main
- Paper no. 4
- Tutorial 1
- Practice Exam Stats
- Research_Methods_7RM.docx
- suture
- Statistics
- behfinance_prelim_ASSIGNMENT_NO_3.docx;filename*= UTF-8''behfinance%20prelim%20ASSIGNMENT%20NO%203
- IIFT Handbook
- Estimatiom Ch 9
- GridDataReport-newdata7

You are on page 1of 5

Research Article

Gradient for Density Determination Used in a Mine at

Barberton City of Ohio, United States

BAUMGRATZ, Leonardo Lucas

Fundação Agência das Bacias Hidrográficas dos Rios Piracicaba, Capivari e Jundiaí

E-mail: expansaoescalar@gmail.com; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9546-4956; Tel: 55 19 996022040

densities, although in most cases it does not match the densities obtained directly in the

laboratory from rock samples representative of the location. The densities of the laboratory

samples were systematically lower when compared to the densities calculated by gravimetric

determination suggesting some kind of systematic error. Several researchers propose different

sources to explain these systematic errors including an anomalous value of the free-air vertical

gradient. The anomalous value was admitted for the free-air vertical gradient in this paper to

reinterpret the densities determination research made in a mine at Barberton, Ohio, in 1950, by

gravimetric measurements and by laboratory rock samples. The results of both approaches

reached similar densities agreeing with the free-air vertical gradient proposed.

Keywords: Gravimetry, Underground gravity, Free-air vertical gradient, Anomalous vertical gradient.

INTRODUCTION

Gravimetric prospecting methods depend fundamentally that the laboratory samples have a clear and systematic

on the density of the adjacent underground, which can be tendency to have low-density values when compared to

achieved by two different processes. It can be measured densities determined by gravimetry, and the conclusion

directly in the laboratory using a set of samples was that "...the main suspect of causing this systematic

representing the region of interest, or it can be calculated error could be an anomalous value of the free-air vertical

by the variation of gravity on a vertical profile, which is the gradient caused by local or regional anomalies of gravity

method for determining density by the Underground in the mine vicinity.” Later, he studied local and regional

Gravity Vertical Gradient (UGVG). maps of Bouguer anomalies trying to explain this anomaly

but did not find any evidence that could justify it. It is

A lot of practical works done in deep mines show that in interesting to note that Hammer (1950) suggested as the

most cases the densities obtained by the two processes main cause of the error an anomalous value of the free-air

are discordant, as mentioned by Hammer (1950) whose vertical gradient.

research investigated carefully the underground densities

in a mine 2,246.60 feet deep by means of gravimetric His work was so precise and highlighted an issue so

methods. To check the results, measurements of the important that several authors such as Rogers (1952) and

density of several rock samples representing the profile in Fajklewicz et al. (1982) cited him.

the laboratory were made. Each sample was selected Problems with the free-air vertical gradient are very old.

carefully to be as representative as possible of the 5-foot They were detected in the nineteenth century according to

interval depth. The densities of the samples presented a the list of researchers cited by Thyssen-Bornemisza and

large discordance with the gravimeter results. He reported Stachler (1956), shown in Table 1.

A Study of Anomalous Value of Free-Air Vertical Gradient for Density Determination used in a Mine at Barberton City of Ohio of United States

Baumgratz LL. 152

Table 1: Experimental values of the free-air vertical gradient and its deviation from the standard value of -0.3086 mGal,

according to Thyssen-Bornemisza and Stachler (1956).

Free-air vertical gradient observed Deviation from normal

Authors Year Height (ft)

(mGal/m) value

Jolly 1881 68.913 -0.295 -0.0136

M.Thiesen 1890 37.660 -0.303 -0.0056

Scheel and Diesselhorst 1895 97.541 -0.289 -0.0196

Richarz and Kriegar-Menzel 1898 7.424 -0.285 -0.0236

By studying this list of authors, it is possible to see that the Eq. (3) may be solved directly for the density giving:

mean gradient value is -0.293 mGal/m. According to the F ( g T )

concepts proposed by Baumgratz (2003), the free-air Equation (4)

vertical gradient could be -0.2922 mGal. 4 G 4 G .H

The density σ can be calculated by Eq. 4 where F is the

MATERIALS AND METHODS free-air vertical gradient, G is the gravitational constant,

and Δg/ΔH is the angular coefficient dg0/dH obtained by

Gravimetric determination of underground densities is regression analysis. The term ΔT represents the variation

based on the correct interpretation of the gravimetric of the Terrain Correction over the elevation interval ΔH,

variations. It is the methodology normally used in UGVG and this term is ordinarily so small that no appreciate error

studies. In this context, the free-air vertical gradient is of is introduced by using an assumed value of the density for

fundamental importance. it (Hammer, 1950). This author admitted for F the standard

Hammer (1950) investigated the underground densities in value of -0.3086, and then Eq. (4) resulted in:

a mine by laboratory measurements of a set of samples

representing the region and by UGVG method. The

laboratory samples mean density was 2.562 g/cm and

3.687 39.201 ( g T ) / H Equation (5)

standard deviation of 0.127. This author admitted for F the

standard value of -0.3086 mGal. For H given in foot, which explains the value 39.201. The

Using this new value of F=-0.2922 is the main change to solution showed a high density of 2.75 g/cm3, diverging

reinterpret Hammer (1950) in the calculations of the from the mean density of the laboratory samples that was

underground density by gravimetric determination. The 2.562 g/cm3 (Hammer, 1950).

method for calculating the underground density applied in

this paper is the same that was used by Hammer (1950) in When adjusting F = -0.2922 the solution for Eq. (4) is:

his work. The only modification made here was in relation 3.4861 39.201 ( g T ) / H 2.548

to the free-air vertical gradient that became -0.2922 mGal. Equation (6)

In this case, the regression analysis shows a profile's

RESULTS mean density of 2.548 g/cm³ compatible with laboratory

samples (2.562 g/cm³) obtained by Hammer (1950).

Determination of the Mean Density by Regression

Analysis If density was calculated by Eq. 4 adopting F=-0.293 (this

value was obtained from Table 1), the result would be

The data gathered by Hammer (1950), which are 2.564 g/cm³; it is very close to the laboratory samples

respectively depth (H) and gravity observed (∆g0) are in density.

Column 1 and 2 of Table 2. The regression function is the

Eq. (1): Determination of Density for Each Depth Based on the

Bouguer Anomaly

g 0 0.0323 0.023918 H Equation (1)

The angular coefficient dg0/dH expresses gravity variation These equations above apply to determine the profile's

per unit of depth. The correlation coefficient is 0.999, so is mean density. These cannot be used to highlight the small

valid the relation: variations in density that occur naturally underground

0.023918 g / H g 0 / H Equation (2) because to do this it would be necessary to consider

Bouguer anomalies. The “normal” gravity (∆gN) is a

It is known that in an underground vertical profile the theoretical value calculated by regression analyses and its

difference in gravity between two stations makes it correct interpretation depends on field studies. According

possible to calculate the density through the well-known to Hammer (1950), there are no external gravity anomalies

expressions (Hammer, 1950): interfering in the system under study; it can be assumed

g F 4 G H T Equation (3)

that the difference between the “observed” and “normal”

gravity is caused by local variations of densities. Table 2

Int. J. Geol. Min. 153

(from Column 1 to 11) shows the calculations of the depth gravity observed should be equal to normal gravity, but

densities through the anomalous free-air vertical gradient they are different as shown in Column 4. Terrestrial

proposed here. Columns 1, 2 and 5 are the data gathered Correction (TC) (topographical and internal corrections of

by Hammer (1950), which are respectively depth, gravity the mine) was obtained from the tables made by Hammer

observed and Terrestrial Correction. (1939). The difference between observed and normal

gravity summed to TC can be interpreted and studied as a

The normal gravity results are in Column 3. It is noteworthy Bouguer Anomaly; their values are in Column 6. The

that these should be the gravity values that the profile variations presented by the Bouguer anomaly and

would have if its density was constant, it was calculated by identified as ∆B make it possible to calculate how much

Eq. (1). This is a purely theoretical concept and the theory the density varies between two stations.

must be confirmed by practice. The results found for

Table 2: Reinterpretation of the Hammer (1950) based on new gravity vertical gradient*.

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11)

H ∆g0 Normal ΔgN TC Bouger Anomaly ΔB ΔH (ΔB/ΔH) x 104 ΔϬ Ϭ**

(2) - (3) (4) + (5) (7)/(8)

Feet mGal mGal mGal mGal mGal feet g/cm³ g/cm³

Surface 0 0 0 0.03 0.03 -0.15 204 -7.31 0.029 2.577

204 4.9 4.88 0.02 -0.14 -0.12 0.07 192 3.53 -0.014 2.534

396 9.63 9.46 0.16 -0.21 -0.05 0.04 208 1.69 -0.007 2.541

604 14.65 14.45 0.20 -0.22 -0.02 -0.02 192 -1.16 0.005 2.553

796 19.20 19.04 0.16 -0.20 -0.04 -0.03 208 -1.68 0.007 2.555

1004 24.09 24.01 0.08 -0.15 -0.07 -0.18 192 -9.49 0.037 2.585

1196 28.46 28.61 -0.15 -0.11 -0.26 0.00 208 -0.24 0.001 2.549

1404 33.38 33.58 -0.20 -0.06 -0.26 -0.14 192 -7.41 0.029 2.577

1596 37.78 38.17 -0.39 -0.01 -0.40 0.42 208 19.96 -0.078 2.470

1804 43.12 43.15 -0.03 0.04 0.01 0.22 192 11.34 -0.044 2.504

1996 47.88 47.74 0.14 0.09 0.23 -0.05 206 -2.28 0.009 2.557

2202 52.70 52.67 0.03 0.15 0.18 -0.01 44.6 -1.51 0.006 2.554

2246,6 54.13 53.73 0.40 -0.22 0.18

*For assumed F= -0.2922 mGal.

**For assumed "normal" density 2.548 g/cm³

Column 7 shows the Bouguer variations and Column 8 the errors in elevation interval; errors in reductions and, lastly,

depth variation. These data give the variation of density by in anomalous vertical gradient. He concluded the main

Eq. (7) and shown in Column 10. suspect of causing this systematic error would be an

anomalous value of the free-air vertical gradient caused by

39.201 ( B / H ) Equation (7) local or regional gravity anomalies in the vicinity of the

mine.

The density of each station (Column 11) is the mean Table 3 and Figure 1 make it possible to compare the three

density of 2.548 summed to density variation, Eq. (8) results of densities, which are the laboratory samples in

Column 2, calculated by Hammer (1950) in Column 3 and

2.548 Equation (8) calculated to free-air anomalous value proposed in

Column 4. The density difference between laboratory

samples and free-air proposed has never exceeded the

DISCUSSION standard deviation in all depths. This can be easily seen in

Figure 1, its curves practically intertwined and it shows

The densities obtained by Hammer (1950) in the more clearly how these two densities are next to each

laboratory and by gravimetric determination show other.

a significant difference, and most of the density results of

gravity determination exceeded the standard deviation of The curve of free-air proposed keeps the same curvature

mean laboratory samples, only at 1596 and 2202 feet of the free-air standard because the same method was

depth they did not exceed. According to this author, the used for the booth. A lot of practical works done in deep

densities, calculated by the UGVG method, in some depth mines show that in most cases the densities obtained by

intervals exceeded the density of all individual laboratory the two processes are discordant. So; further studies

samples in the respective interval. He discussed the should be done to investigate this anomalous value of free-

sources of errors in his work; errors in the gravity readings; air in a vicinity of the mine (i.e Barberton, Ohio, U.S.A.) to

A Study of Anomalous Value of Free-Air Vertical Gradient for Density Determination used in a Mine at Barberton City of Ohio of United States

Baumgratz LL. 154

(1) (2) (3) (4)

Density obtained through UGVG

Depth Density of laboratory samples Calculated by Hammer (1950) Calculated through Free-air proposed

F= -0.3086 F= -0.2922

0 2.450 2.779 2.577

204 2.544 2.734 2.534

396 2.543 2.745 2.541

604 2.545 2.752 2.553

796 2.577 2.757 2.555

1004 2.521 2.785 2.585

1196 2.626 2.752 2.549

1404 2.649 2.777 2.577

1596 2.588 2.673 2.470

1804 2.545 2.703 2.504

1996 2.579 2.759 2.557

2202 2.640 2.750 2.554

Mean 2.562* 2.747 2.546

* It is the mean of all laboratory samples in Hammer (1950), and its standard deviation is 0.127.

whether it is generalized value as proposed by Baumgratz In this specific case, the anomalous value of free-air

(2003). vertical gradient of -0.2922 mGal justifies the density

results found by Hammer (1950) at Barberton, Ohio,

It needs to consider that value of free-air= -0.2922 mGal is

United States.

not a mere supposition, it has a mathematical and

conceptual basis developed in respect to the principles of

mechanics, and it has already been applied to the works

REFERENCES

of Bullen (1953) and Götze et al. (1988) satisfactorily

explaining the anomalies they pointed out according to Baumgratz LL (2003). Os Padrões em um Universo

Baumgratz (2003, 2013). Surrealista: Uma introdução à teoria da expansão.

Piracicaba, Br: Editora Degaspari Ltda, 162 p.

If the anomalous value of free-air will be correct in this Baumgratz LL (2013) Scalar Expansion the universe in

specific case, the densities determination of a finite interval inflation. Available in:

of underground rocks in a place with the gravimeter is so http://www.academia.edu/33282759/Scalar_Expansion_-

accuracy like as laboratory measurements of rock _The_Universe_in_Inflation Accessed: October 7, 2013.

samples. Anomalous value of the free-air vertical gradient Bullen KE (1953). An Introduction to the Theory of

can be the main cause of systematic error found by Seismology. Cambridge at the University Press,

Hammer (1950). Cambridge, 499 p.

A Study of Anomalous Value of Free-Air Vertical Gradient for Density Determination used in a Mine at Barberton City of Ohio of United States

Int. J. Geol. Min. 155

Fajklewicz Z, Glinski A & Sliz J (1982). Some applications Accepted 23 February 2018

of the underground tower gravity vertical gradient.

Geophysics 47:1688-1692. Citation: Baumgratz LL (2018). A Study of Anomalous

Götze HJ, Lahmeyer B, Schmidt S. Strunk S (1988). Value of Free-Air Vertical Gradient for Density

Aplicaciones de gravimetria en geología: curso de Determination Used in a Mine at Barberton City of Ohio,

postgrado. Universidad Nacional de Salta, Argentina, United States. International Journal Geology and Mining

pp. 51-65. 4(1): 151-155.

Hammer S (1939). Terrain corrections for gravimeter

stations. Geophysics, 4:184-194.

Hammer S (1950) Density determinations by underground

gravity measurements. Geophysics, 15: 637-651.

Copyright: © 2018. Baumgratz LL. This is an open-access

Rogers GR (1952). Subsurface gravity measurements.

article distributed under the terms of the Creative

Geophysics, 17: 365-377.

Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted

Thyssen-Bornemisza S, Stackler WF (1956). Observation

use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,

of the vertical gradient of gravity in the field.

Geophysics, 21: 771-779. provided the original author and source are cited.

A Study of Anomalous Value of Free-Air Vertical Gradient for Density Determination used in a Mine at Barberton City of Ohio of United States

- Primer (Mean, Standard Deviation)Uploaded byNenad Mihajlov
- TorqueUploaded byhegdemacha
- Slee Ger Set Al 2013Uploaded byjan
- DMAIC - GRR Template.xlsxUploaded byAnonymous rvXfvF
- Tpi Documentation OnlineUploaded byviridio
- ap lab 00 - equations 20131Uploaded byapi-260566183
- The Population is the Set of Entities Under StudyUploaded bySuvam
- Hero HondaUploaded bySachin Joshi
- Icdcd Action ResearchUploaded byOdlasirc Onitnop
- 1-s2.0-S0191886917301125-mainUploaded byRalucaȘerbănoiu
- Paper no. 4Uploaded byireneclar126
- Tutorial 1Uploaded byberapi
- Practice Exam StatsUploaded byGreg
- Research_Methods_7RM.docxUploaded byaris
- sutureUploaded byNisitya
- StatisticsUploaded byAbhijit Pathak
- behfinance_prelim_ASSIGNMENT_NO_3.docx;filename*= UTF-8''behfinance%20prelim%20ASSIGNMENT%20NO%203Uploaded byJo Edward Escovilla Aguila
- IIFT HandbookUploaded byitihas1
- Estimatiom Ch 9Uploaded byDamian Deo
- GridDataReport-newdata7Uploaded byMega Bayu S
- Lam 1986 Aquacultural-EngineeringUploaded byJorge Rodriguez
- Acara 3 AnovaUploaded byUmro Meina
- Copy of 38 ProgramsmmUploaded byHusnain A Ali
- Dependencia, Desapego y Psicopatologia en Una Muestra No Clinica - Relaciones Generales y Diferencias de Genero. - Hay Una Nueva Linea de Investigación de La Patologia ParanoideUploaded byGentleman.z
- University of Cambridge International Examinations General CertificateUploaded byHubbak Khan
- Dsur i Chapter 02 Everything You Ever Wanted to Know About StatisticsUploaded byDanny
- ingreso2Uploaded byCarlos Báez T
- Sample Test 3Uploaded byJayanthi Loganathan
- Conditional Simulations of Fluid Flow in Three-dimensional Networks of Discrete FracturesUploaded byali
- page-8Uploaded byNurul Fadilah Syahrul

- Study on Combining Ability and Heterosis in Maize (Zea mays l.) Using Partial Diallel AnalysisUploaded byPremier Publishers
- Modelling of Longitudinal Pulse Rate, Respiratory Rate and Blood Pressure Measurements from Congestive Heart Failure Patients under Follow Up at Tikur Anbessa Specialized HospitalUploaded byPremier Publishers
- Evaluation of Oxidative Stress and Stress Induced Serum Protein Changes in PsoriasisUploaded byPremier Publishers
- A Retrospective Analysis of Complications of Pelvic Exenteration - A Single Institution Experience of 6 YearsUploaded byPremier Publishers
- Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of Aluminum Alloy-Alumina-Boron Carbide Metal Matrix CompositesUploaded byPremier Publishers
- Use of Low-Cost Pest Exclusion Net to Control Tuta absoluta Infestation and Boost the Yield of Tomato in Surkhet and Dang Districts of NepalUploaded byPremier Publishers
- Correlation Between ECG Changes and 2D Speckle Tracking Echocardiography with Coronary Angiography in Non-ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction PatientsUploaded byPremier Publishers
- A Community Survey of the Willingness, Perceptions and Practice of Blood Donation Among Adults in Kano MetropolisUploaded byPremier Publishers
- Syntax Score and its Relation to Lipoprotein a –Lp (a) and Extended Lipid Parameters in Non-Diabetic Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Having Age below 55 YearsUploaded byPremier Publishers
- Genetic and Morphological Diversity Analysis of Ethiopian Mustard (Brasica carinataa. Braun) LandracesUploaded byPremier Publishers
- Role of Oral Gefitinib In Recurrent Carcinoma Cervix in Relation to EGFR StatusUploaded byPremier Publishers
- Variation of Heavy Metal Concentration in Soil and Plant with Distance Away from the Edge of the Road and Depth at which the Soil Samples were taken along Song – Yola Highway Adamawa State NigeriaUploaded byPremier Publishers
- Evaluation of Cotton Advanced Inbreed Lines for Seed Cotton Yield and Yield ComponentsUploaded byPremier Publishers
- A New Keynesian Model with Estimated Shadow Rate for Japan EconomyUploaded byPremier Publishers
- Stability in Tea {Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze} Genotypes Using GGE Bi-plot Analysis in NigeriaUploaded byPremier Publishers
- Assessment of Ginger and Black Pepper as Feed Additives on Growth Performance and Carcass Traits of Broiler ChickensUploaded byPremier Publishers
- Understanding Drought Coping Mechanisms in Smallholder Farm Households: Evidence from Dry Lands of EritreaUploaded byPremier Publishers
- Spatial Planning for Socio-Economic DevelopmentUploaded byPremier Publishers
- Effect of Bui Hydroelectric Dam on Household Livelihood DiversificationUploaded byPremier Publishers
- Organic Food Purchase Intention: Examining the Influence of Religion on Consumers’ DecisionsUploaded byPremier Publishers
- Naturally Occurring Insecticides from the Marine Sponge Xestospongia testudinaria to Control the Whitefly Bemicia tabaci (Genn.) and the Aphid Aphis gossypii (Glover)Uploaded byPremier Publishers
- A System of Estimators of the Population Mean under Two-Phase Sampling in Presence of Two Auxiliary VariablesUploaded byPremier Publishers
- Comparative Effect of Root Pruning and Pythium irregulare on Water Use Efficiency of Wheat Under Water StressUploaded byPremier Publishers
- Reward System Variables and Job Satisfaction of Librarians in Academic Libraries in Imo State, NigeriaUploaded byPremier Publishers
- Sequence Stratigraphy, Variable Sedimentations, Sea Level Fluctuations and Net Effect on Reservoir Qualities: A Study of Cores from Two Wells GX1 and GX2 in the Niger Delta BasinUploaded byPremier Publishers
- Geoelectrical and Hydrochemical Assessment of Groundwater for Potability in Ebonyi North, Southeastern NigeriaUploaded byPremier Publishers
- Extraction and Quantification of Anthocyanin from Banana Bracts Using Different pH and Solvent ConcentrationUploaded byPremier Publishers
- The Correlation between Nutrition Status and Gross Motor Development: A Case in Banten, IndonesiaUploaded byPremier Publishers
- Heterosis Studies for Agro-morphological and Fiber Quality Traits in Cotton (Gossypium spp.) Hybrids at Werer, EthiopiaUploaded byPremier Publishers

- Performance Qual Hplc 2008Uploaded bymeong
- Isomerism in Biomolecules.pdfUploaded byfakhribabiker
- Survey Wireless Mesh Networking Security Technology Threats 1657Uploaded byHemal
- 17022015 Análisis y Evaluación de Los Coeficientes de Ajuste Del Valor Inmobiliario de La Parcela UrbanaUploaded byAlfredo Loaiza
- Aprilia RS 50 Engine Service Manual Www.manualedereparatie.infoUploaded byBruno Fernández Alonso
- Experimental Study of the Heat Transfer and Air Gap.pdfUploaded bysb ali
- IGNOU MCS-024 Solved Assigment 2013-14Uploaded byLakshman Swamy
- The Magnus EffectUploaded bythe_chimera
- ABAP SYLLABUSUploaded byAzeez99
- ep_136_01_011011Uploaded byYasinta Dewi Pradina
- Fundamentals of Clincal Radiology ResearchUploaded byDr Doom
- 186236855 Deflection Limits for CraneUploaded byThanh Dao Ba
- EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF ZEOLITE BASE SOLAR VAPOUR ADSORPTION REFRIGERATION SYSTEMUploaded byJournal 4 Research
- Connection_ffbbn.pptUploaded byAbh Abh
- An Introduction to the Kalman Filter (FULL VERSION)Uploaded bykasra_tm
- ch6Uploaded byIndranil Bhattacharyya
- Pulleys TechUploaded byashkansoheyl
- SSIS EssentialsUploaded byapi-3803903
- IGCSE Physics - ElectricityUploaded byHyun Jung Hong
- Manual de la MotherBoard Porras Jose(G31TM-P21_G31TM-P25_G31TM-P31_G31TM-P35)100x150Uploaded byKmilo Andres
- Corrosion-FatigueAnalysisType2.docxUploaded byvarun chena
- Take Home QuizUploaded byGrace
- Desalination CaCO3 Pipe 2015Uploaded byDrFatema Hussain
- Electronic LockUploaded byRazzle Ronsairo
- English Fd2002 Instruction ManuelUploaded bykxtrmcb
- Lab 5 (Result, Discussion, Reco)Uploaded byMarouane Adam
- Hub Location and Network DesignUploaded byKarina Lang
- qmUploaded byDarruma
- dwhUploaded byRajesh Kumar
- Unit Circle Lesson PlanUploaded bykcarr13