‘AHLUSSUNNAH WAL JAMA:”AH

ENGINEER “ALI: MIRZA: OF JHELUM

AND HIS INCLINATION TOWARDS
QA:DIYA:NIAH AND NAS:I:RIAH
REFUTING ENGINEER ALI MIRZA OF JHELUM
ABU: MUH:IB
3/26/2018

[Type the abstract of the document here. The abstract is typically a short summary of the contents of
the document. Type the abstract of the document here. The abstract is typically a short summary of the
contents of the document.]
 Page 2 of 8

Page 2 of 8
 Page 3 of 8

ENGINEER “ALI: MIRZA: OF JHELUM

AND HIS INCLINATION TOWARDS
QA:DIYA:NIAH AND NAS:I:RIAH
ENGINEER “ALI: MIRZA: OF JHELUM has inclinations towards Qa:dianiah and Nas:i:riah.

He said in one of his lectures that he declared them as Ka:fir only because they declare him as
Ka:fir.

This did expose his secret contacts with these to Ka:fir sects.

It EPOSETH THAT the Engineer “Ali: Mirza contacted the leadership and asked them whether
they declare Engineer “Ali: Mirza: as Ka:fir or not . to his surprise they declared him as Ka:fir
and as a Reaction the Engineer declared them as Ka:fir. If they had declared his as Muslim in-
spite of their Kurfiah believes Engineer Of Jhelum would have declared each one of the two
Ka:fir sects as Muslim [Na”u:dh:billah Va ‘Aatagh:farullah].

SYMBOLIC REPRESENTATION OF ENGINEER’S HERESY

Let

A= An Article of Kufr [Infidelity].

P= A Person who believeth in A.

B=Belief of Person P in Article Of Kufr A.

ψ= All those Persons Who do not believe in A and are Muslims.

Λ= Declaration of Kufr

Now we declare P was Ka:fir [Λ] due to B [His belief in Article of Kufr A].

On the contrary Engineer “Ali: Mirza: declares P as Ka:fir only because of Λ OF ψ.

What is the result of this ?

This meaneth that the Engineer of Jhelum doeth not consider A as Kufr.
Page 3 of 8
 Page 4 of 8

This implieth that this person “Ali: Mirza: doeth not accept that A is an Article off Kufr.

This proveth the claim that Engineer “Ali: Mirza: doeth not consider a Kufr as Kufr.

This is a Kufr in itself.

ENGINEER’S ARGUMENT AND ITS ANALYZATION.

Engineer “Ali: Mirza: of Jhelum says that if “Engineer “Ali: Mirza: continueth to be a Muslim
even if he denieth that Mirza: is not a Prophet then Mirza: cannot be a Prophet.

But he forgot that Mirza of Qa:dia:n is not a Prophet since Holy Prophet is the LAST and FINAL
Prophet [Nabi:]. Any one who believeth that a person is prophetised after Holy Prophet is
CERTAINLY a Ka:fir. Mirza: Gh:ula:m ‘Ah:mad was a Kafir since he claimed prophethood.

Now coming to the claim of Mirza: of Jhelum.

His argument is analyzed as follow:

If some one say P1 denieth the claim of Prophethood of another person P2 and still remaineth a
Muslim then P2 is not a Prophet.

In can be further summarized as follow:

If P1 denieth that P2 is a Prophet and remaineth a Muslim then P2 is not a Prophet.

-------------------P1 [Proposition P1]

But if some one can deny the Finality of Holy Prophet One of the Necessities of ‘Isla:m and

And Axioms of ‘Isla:m can he not deny the Proposition P1.

Is Engineer “Ali: Mirza: of Jhelum considering all Muslims to accept his irrationalities?

He must have known that at some earlier stages of Mirza Gh:ula:m ‘Ah:mad of Qa:diya:n he
claimed that if some one doeth not believe in his prophethood remains a Muslim.

Doeth the Engineer not Know that Muh:mmad “Ali: Laho:ri: did not declare those as Ka:fir who
denied Mirza:

Does the Muh:ammad “Ali of Jhelum consider the Muh:ammad “Ali: of Lahore as Muslim?

We solemnly say that Muh:ammad “Ali: Laho:ri: and his followers are equally Ka:fir as the
followers of Mirza: Mah:mu:d of Qa:diya:n.

Page 4 of 8
 Page 5 of 8

Mirza: Gh:ula:m ‘Ah:mad of Qa:diya:n is Ka:fir and as Engineer “Ali: Mirza: has inclinations
towards Mirza: Gh;la:m ‘Ah:mad as the heretic Engineer himself accepts in his lecture , those
who accept Engineer’s teaching in this regard are also out of the folds of ‘Isla:m.

Doeth he consider that scholars and historians have ceased in Muslims?

Doeth he consider to speak falsehood so boldly and confidently that he thinks he can deceive his
audience?

What is the conspiracy behind all this?

ON THE OTHER HAND THIS ENGINEER IS TRYING TO DECLARE GREAT SUNNI

SCHOLARS AS BLASPHAMERS .

NA”U:DH:UBILLAH.

This is a proof that Engineer “Ali: Mirza: is a Heretic and want to destroy ‘ISLA:M.

MUH:AMMAD “ALI: OF JHELUM BORROWETH

FROM MUH:AMMAD OF LAHORE
[FOUNDER OF LAHORI SECT OF MIZA:ISM]
Actually it was the belief of Lahori Mirzai group [founded by Muh:ammad “Ali Lahori that
those who deny Mirza: are Muslim unless and otherwise they declare Lohorites and Mirza as
Ka:fir. Engineer Muh:ammad “Ali: Mirza: of Jhelum doeth borrow from them.

We quote a paragraph from the book of Muh:ammad “Ali: La:ho:ri to shew the similarities of
Engineer “Ali: Mirza: of Jhelum and founder of Lahorite sect of Mirza:’ism Muh:ammad “Ali:
Laho:ri:

THE Apostate Muha:ammad “Ali: Lahori said:-

"In 1914 we separated from Qadian and laid the foundation in Lahore of the Ahmadiyya
Anjuman Isha`at Islam. The only reason for this was that we did not consider to be correct the
belief of the present Qadiani Khalifa that all non-Ahmadi Muslims are kafir and outside the
fold of Islam. This belief was opposed to the clear teachings and the practice of the Founder of
the Movement himself, as well as against the plain teachings of the Quran and Hadith”.

This means that there is no other difference between two sects of Mirza:’is i.e Qa:diya:niah [Qa:dianites]

And La:ho:riah [Lahorites] except the issue of Takfi:r of others. If so then this proveth that Engineer “Ali:
Mirza: Of Jhelum neither do consider Lahorites nor can consider them as Ka:fir, since the principle is
borrowed from Lhorite Mirzaites.

Page 5 of 8
 Page 6 of 8

Point to be noted.

1]Engineer “Ali: Mirza: is a Heretic how want to implant Lahorism in ‘Isla:m, since he very slowly and
mischievely crawls towards their views.

2] Lahorites offer prayers behind any Muslim and the same is the belief of Engineer “Ali: Mirza.

3] According to Lahorite Mirzais any one who recites Kalimah is a Muslim unless and otherwise he/she
declares Mirza Gh:ula:m ‘Ah:mad Qa:diyani as Kafir or Lahorites as Ka:fir.

The only exception they make is for Qa:diya:ni group since in several stages of Muh:ammad “Ali: Laho:ri

He did not declared Qa:diya:ni sect of Mirza:’ism as K:afir. If he had done so he would have done it at a
very latter stage.

Engineer “Ali: Mirza: follows the Lahorites in this issue.

4] Marriages with Non Lahorites [including Qa:dianis] is allowed in Lahorism. The same is almost the
view of Engineer “Ali: Mirza: of Jhelum with some modifications.

So these similarities expose the close resemblance between Muh:ammad “Ali: Laho:ri THE FOUNDER
OF LAHO:RI SECT of Mirza:’ism and ENGINEER “ALI: MIRZA JHELUMI the founder of Jhelumi
sect. One must equate both of them and declare both of the two sects out of the folds of ‘Isla:m.

Since MIRZA OF JHELUM doeth not consider the following believes as INDEPENDENT kufr.

1] THE BELIEF OF DIVINITY OF SAYIDUNA “ALI: RD: [NA”UDH:UBILLAH].

2] THE DENOUNCING OF THE FINALITY AND LASTHOOD OF THE PROPHETHOOD OF HOLY

PROPHET .

If Engineer would have declared such believes as Kufr he had not based the issue of takfi:r on the takfi:r
done by Nas:i:rian and Qa:diya:niah.

A SIMPLE CONUNDRUM

Initially Mirza: Gh:ula:m ‘Ah:mad of Qa:diya:n was of the view that:-

"There is no claim to Prophethood but to Muhaddathyat which has been made under
the command of Allah. There is no doubt in it that Muhaddathyat has a potential of
Nabuwwah in it.

….. if it be declared a metaphoric Nabuwwah, then does it mean that there is a claim of
'Nabuwwah'?"

(Azala-e-Auham, pp. 421-422)

Page 6 of 8
 Page 7 of 8

Yes even this is a Kufr with Certainty. But Lahorites still use such sentences. What
doeth this shew. Engineer “Ali: Mirza: cannot declare them as Ka:fir according to
his standard of Takfi:r WHICH he hath borrowed from Lahorites.

Lahorites say:
"The word Prophet (Nabi) has not been used in its Shariah terminological meanings because in
that sense Holy Prophet Muhammad, peace be on him, is the Last of the Prophets. Rather the
word Prophet in this article has been used in its wider meanings indicating one who makes
prophecies after receiving news from Allah and it is that favour which is promised by Allah to all
righteous Muslims in the Holy Quran in the verse: "LAHUM-UL-BUSHRAA FIL HAYAT AD
DUNYA"

Note of Muh:ammad “Ali: Lahori on the Article “Ahmad is the Prophet” in Review 1904 CE.

We askfollowers of Engineer “Ali: Mirza: of Jhelum “ Do you consider

Muh:ammad “Ali: Lahori as a Muslim when he use the word Nabi: not according
to Shar”ah but in the literal meaning and not declaring Non Lahorites as Ka:fir?

As for us we declare Lahorites as Ka:fir for using this term since it is not allowed
to use this term and it is a Kufr to use this term for Mirza of Qa:diya:n even in
literal meaning.

It is hoped that followers of Engineer “Ali: Mirza: must have understood the
heresy of the one whome they follow in one sense or the other , that Engineer “Ali:
Mirza: is inspired by Lahorites if not one of the Lahorites.

TO THE FOLLOWERS OF THE

ENGINEER “ALI: MIRZA
HOW MANY EVIDENCES DO YOU REQUIRE BEFORE YOU ARE
CONVINCED THAT ENGINEER “ALI: MIRZA: IS A HERECTIC AND
A TRATOR.

Page 7 of 8
 Page 8 of 8

DO YOU STILL REQUIRE PROOFS AND EVIDENCES?

FOR THE SAKE OF ‘ALL-H PLEASE DO NOT FOLLOW HIM ANY
MORE OTHER WISE THIS HERETIC SHALL SPOIL YOUR FAITH.
PERHAPS HE HAS ALREADY SPOILED THE FAITH OF MANY.
PLEASE DO NOT LISTEN TO HIS LECTURES UNLESS AND
OTHERWISE YOU HAVE SUFFICIENT KNOWLEDGE TO REFUTE
HIS HERESIES AND HETERODOXIES.

Page 8 of 8