Professional Documents
Culture Documents
133681
Feet 1 Minute 0.000694 Liters 0.035594
Meter 3.283333 Hour 0.041667 Cubic inch 0.000579
cm 0.032833 Day 1
mm 0.003283
PSI 2.31
y0 = 0.69 Meter 4
y0 (output units)= 0.69 Meter
2
Fraction penetrated = 1 0
0 0.5 1
Rc = 0.082083 ft
Rw = 0.082083 ft
Lwetted 6.566667 ft
D= 9.85 ft
H= 9.85 ft
L/rw = 80.00
partial Err:502 Err:502 Err:502
full 3.621374
ln(Re/rw) = 3.621374
Re = 3.07
Slope = 258.109 log10/day
K= 1.102908 ft/d
K= 3.89E-06 Meter/Sec 0.0000001
K= 3.9E-06 Meter/Sec 39
D= 0.913706 Meter
T = 3.56E-06 Meter2/Se 0.0000001
T= 3.6E-06 Meter2/Se 36
Decision Option
0 Water level is below base of screen
0 Casing diameter is greater than the Annulus
0 Base of screen is deeper than base of aquifer
0 Screen length is less than 0.1 ft 0.1
0 Slope will produce a negative K
0 K= 0.0000039 is less than extreme minimum o 1.762549E-07
0 K= 0.0000039 is greater than extreme maximu 0.000070502
0 Slug discrepancy of 10% is greater than maximum of 20% 10 20
1 Input is consistent.
Error
WARNING
K= 0.0000039 is less than likely minimum of 0.0000106 for Fine Sand
Decision Option
0
1 K= 0.0000039 is less than likely minimum of 0 1.05753E-05 -5 1.06E-05
1 K= 0.0000039 is greater than likely maximum o 0.000070502 -5 7.05E-05
2
1 5 6 8
Empirical look-up table for Bouwer and Rice method of slug test analysis
log(L/rw) A B C D-log Delta-A Delta-B Delta-C
0.5 1.738 0.229 0.835 0.189133 0 0 0 1.90309
0.689133 1.738 0.229 0.835 0.202 0.064 0.04 0.255 1.90309
0.891133 1.802 0.269 1.09 0.098167 0.068 -0.004 0.102
0.9893 1.87 0.265 1.192 0.295633 0.305 0.074 0.504
1.284933 2.175 0.339 1.696 0.172867 0.289 0.068 0.327
1.4578 2.464 0.407 2.023 0.2277 0.593 0.083 0.675
1.6855 3.057 0.49 2.698 0.141867 0.547 0.095 0.585
1.827367 3.604 0.585 3.283 0.159667 0.793 0.153 0.9
1.987033 4.397 0.738 4.183 0.283767 1.625 0.365 2.549
2.2708 6.022 1.103 6.732 0.187333 1.047 0.407 1.943
2.458133 7.069 1.51 8.675 0.217233 0.993 0.6175 1.905
2.675367 8.062 2.1275 10.58 0.305233 1.094 0.721 1.74
2.9806 9.156 2.8485 12.32 0.296633 0.611 0.469 0.806
3.277233 9.767 3.3175 13.126
14 A
B
12
C
10
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
Kestimate
3.9E-06
3.9E-06
3.9E-06
WELL
0
13
Fully penetrating cut-off = 0.98
Significant Digits = 2
Annular Fill:
Base of Aquifer
across screen -- Coarse Sand
above screen -- Bentonite
Adjust slope of line to estimate K
Aquifer Material -- Fine Sand 1
COMPUTED
Lwetted 2 Meter
D= 3 Meter
H= 3 Meter
L/rw = 80.00
y0-DISPLACEMENT = 0.69 Meter
y/y0
K = 3.9E-06 Meter/Second
0.1
0:00:00.0 0:00:43.2 0:01:26.4 0:02:09.6
TIME, Minute:Second 0:02:52.8
Slug test was conducted in Suomenniemi aquifer, south-eastern Finland, which is mostly medium and fine
sand. This work resulted from an investigation on road salting with non-corrosive potassium formate by the
Finnish Environmental Institute (Héllsten et al. 2003).
382441494.xls
382441494.xls
382441494.xls
382441494.xls
0 0:00:00.0 0.00 0 0:00:00.0 0.00
0 0:00:00.0 0.00 0 0:00:00.0 0.00
0:00:00.0
382441494.xls
382441494.xls
382441494.xls
DATA 382441494.xls
INPUT Final pressure (water level) = 2.54 < NOTE: value is final pressure reading.
Slug Description: 2.77 < Overwrite with best guess of the initial
Type: Poured water level if the well did not fully recover
VOLUME 1.5 Liters
Page 13
DATA 382441494.xls
Page 14
DATA 382441494.xls
Page 15
DATA 382441494.xls
Page 16
DATA 382441494.xls
Page 17
DATA 382441494.xls
Page 18
DATA 382441494.xls
Page 19
DATA 382441494.xls
Page 20
DATA 382441494.xls
Page 21
DATA 382441494.xls
Page 22
DATA 382441494.xls
Page 23
DATA 382441494.xls
Page 24
DATA 382441494.xls
Page 25
DATA 382441494.xls
Page 26
DATA 382441494.xls
Page 27
DATA 382441494.xls
Page 28
DATA 382441494.xls
Page 29
DATA 382441494.xls
y0 is computed as a positive
displacement regardless of whether the
slug was inserted or withdrawn.
Page 30
DATA 382441494.xls
positive
dless of whether the
r withdrawn.
Page 31
DATA 382441494.xls
Page 32