Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ARDYL SORONGON,
Accused.
x-----------------------------------------x
OPPOSITION TO DEMURRER
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
1
II. ARGUMENTS/DISCUSSION
The considerations in rape cases are: (1) An accusation for rape can
be made with facility; it is difficult to prove but more difficult for the person
though innocent, to disprove the same; (2) In view of the intrinsic nature of
the crime of rape where only two persons are usually involved, the
testimony of the complainant must be scrutinized with extreme caution;
and (3) The evidence for the prosecution must stand or fall on its own
merits and cannot be allowed to draw strength from the weakness of the
evidence for the defense. (People vs San Diego 328 SCRA 477).
The prosecution has shown through clear and positive evidence that
the plaintiff was drugged during that night. And that the accused was the
one who introduced the drugs into her drinks. One of the witnesses for the
prosecution is the sole waiter for the restaurant during the night of the
rape incident. He has testified that he saw the accused put a white pill in
the drinks of the victim. When asked why he can vividly remember the
things that happened during that night, he answered that it was his first
night assigned as a waiter. It is a natural human reaction to be excited and
remember every first experience in their lives and this waiter was not an
exception. Furthermore, the waiter, Dave Capada, recalled that there were
only two tables that night. It would not be unusual for a waiter to recall
2
every single detail of his customers, especially if there were only two tables
for the night.
Assuming for argument’s sake that the plaintiff was indeed not
drugged, consideration should be given to her testimony of being dizzy and
feeling nauseous. The plaintiff has testified that she has informed the
accused that she felt dizzy and nauseous while they were about to ride the
car. The plaintiff repeatedly informed the accused about her drowsiness
when he transferred her to the back seat of the car. The fact that the
accused still managed to have his way with the victim while she was in a
state of drowsiness proves that he has committed rape. He who lies with a
woman, while the latter is in a state of unconsciousness is guilty of rape.
Drowsiness is defined as the state of being drowsy, that is ready to fall
asleep or half-asleep. A person who is half asleep and therefore in a stupor
of drowsiness or semi-consciouness is not capable of giving full, informed,
intelligent and voluntary consent. (People vs. Salarza GR L-117682 August
18, 1997). Carnal knowledge of a woman who is asleep constitutes rape.
(People vs. Ramos 345 SCRA 178).
3
Where the victim, at the time of her penile invasion, was unconscious, it
could be safely concluded that she had not given free and voluntary
consent to her defilement, whether before or during the sexual act. (People
vs. Mahinay, 302 SCRA 455). The prosecution successfully discharged its
purpose to show that the testimonies of the witnesses deserve full faith
and credit.
III. CONCLUSION
In denying a demurrer to evidence, the court need not state that the
prosecution has established “proof beyond reasonable doubt” – it is
sufficient that words of similar import, such as those stated in the instant
case (“the essential elements of the crime charged”) be present to indicate
that there was a finding of guilt beyond reasonable doubt of the accused.
(Antonio vs. CA, 273 SCRA 328). The prosecution was able to show that all
the elements for the crime charged were present. And that positive
identification of the accused was established. The prosecution has
successfully discharged its onus to show that the general considerations for
an accusation for rape were in favor of the plaintiff and against the
accused.
Based upon the foregoing, the prosecution has shown that the
evidence is sufficient to prove beyond reasonable doubt, or through
circumstantial evidence, that the accused committed the crime of rape
while unconscious against the complainant. It is respectfully prayed that
the Honorable Court overrule the Demurrer to Evidence presented by the
accused.
4
Atty. Phillip Owen Binayas
Assistant City Prosecutor
Copy Furnished: