Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Armin Rudd
Residential Energy Efficiency Stakeholder Meeting
2/29 – 3/2/2012 Austin, Texas
1
Humidity control challenges
2
System engineering trade-offs
Start with high-performance building enclosure
Improves the more permanent features of a home which has
longer-term sustainability benefits
Bulk water management, low loss/gain glass, controlled air change,
ducts inside conditioned space, pressure balancing
Allows for reduced cooling system size
Helps pay for the enclosure improvements
More compact duct system lowers cost and helps get the ducts
inside
Makes overall building performance more predictable
Gives confidence for right-sizing equipment
No short-cycling: Better moisture removal, Higher average
efficiency, Better spatial mixing
Controlled ventilation instead of random infiltration
Results in decreased energy consumption along with
increased occupant comfort
70
Typical Indoor
Dewpoint Temperature (F)
60 Miami
Orlando
50 Houston
New Orleans
Austin
40
Cincinnati
Boston
30 Phoenix
San Francisco
20
Residential Building
Energy Efficiency Meeting 2010 6
20 July 2010
3
Moisture load for cooling and dehumidification systems
in humid climates (75 F/55% RH indoor, 75 F outdoor dewpt)
Air exchange
People
0.25 ach infiltration
Cooking
Dishwashing
Bathing
Clothes washing
0.1 ach infiltration
Floor mopping
with 50 cfm
ventilation Building envelope
New const drying
Source for Cooking through New construction drying: Natural Resources Canada
Residential Building
Energy Efficiency Meeting 2010 7
20 July 2010
1200 4000
Total
1000 3500
Cooling load (W)
Cooling load
3000
800 Latent
2500
(Btu/h)
600 2000
400 1500
Sensible 1000
200 500
0 0
80 85 90 95 100 105
Outdoor air temperature (F)
Residential Building
Energy Efficiency Meeting 2010 8
20 July 2010
4
Conventional Cooling System Dehumidification
Enhancements
1
Carrier includes Bryant
2
Goodman includes Amana
3
ICP includes Comfortmaker, Tempstar, Heil, Arcocaire, Day&Night, Keep Rite
4
Nordyne includes Frigidaire, Gibson, Westinghouse, Tappan, Kelvinator, Philco, Nutone
1,200
Enhanced Two Stage
Unpublished initial results from ASHRAE RP-1449
1,000
Hours Above 60% RH
800
600
400
200
‐
Z0‐Orlando Z1‐Miami Z2‐Houston Z3‐Atlanta Z4‐Nashville Z5‐Indianapolis
HERS 70 HERS 50
Two Stage Enc Two‐Stage Two Stage Enc Two‐Stage
5
Dehumidifier and ventilation duct in interior
mechanical closet with louvered door
6
Dehumidifier process
Evaporator Condenser
coil coil
Return Air
Supply Air
Leaving Air W1
Fan
Dehumidifiers add the heat of condensation, compressor heat,
and fan heat to the space. (Supply air is typically 105 to 115 F)
T1 T2
Goals:
7
Central system with modulating hot gas reheat
Evaporator Modulating
coil hot gas
reheat coil
Return Air
Supply Air
Leaving Air
W1
Fan
Modulate the hot gas reheat to achieve a space-neutral
supply air temperature.
T1 T2
Indoor Unit
Outdoor Unit
Residential Building
Energy Efficiency Meeting 2010 16
20 July 2010
8
Efficiency AMPLIFIED by tracking an optimal
condensing temperature by condenser fan cycling
Copeland Scroll UltraTech®
Copeland Data Condensing Temperature
Condensing Temperature Points
72
100°
71 110°
70
120°
69
Isentropic Efficiency
90°
68
67
ECM® Condenser Fans
130°
66
65
64
80°
63
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500
Watts
AAON Heat Pump with modulating condenser reheat testing
23‐Sep‐2008 (JD 266)
90
80
70
60 RA temp
RA rh
50
SA temp
40
Total W‐h/min
30 Dehumidifier mode
20
10
0
105
131
157
183
209
235
261
287
313
339
365
391
417
443
469
495
521
547
573
599
1
27
53
79
Minutes
Residential Building
Energy Efficiency Meeting 2010 18
20 July 2010
9
Gaps, Barriers, and Future Work
√
Smaller capacity ducted dehumidifier equipment
Further cost reduction of dehumidifiers and central
dehumidifying equipment through design and manufacturing
optimization
Better understanding of actual dehumidification design load,
including moisture storage effects and occupant behavior
More laboratory testing of dehumidifiers to establish better
design criteria and performance maps for simulation models
√
More laboratory and field testing of central dehumidifying
equipment to establish better design criteria and
performance maps for simulation models
10
Proposed humidity control test conditions for
central dehumidifying equipment
Performance map data needs at each test condition and at each equipment control state
For dehumidifer equipment with both indoor and outdoor heat transfer components
11