INSTITUT PENDIDIKAN GURU KAMPUS BAHASA ANTARABANGSA

PENTAKSIRAN KERJA KURSUS –PROJEK

(Jadual Spefifikasi Tugasan, Soalan Tugasan dan Rubrik Permarkahan )

Kursus ENGLISH LANGUAGE Tempoh Tarikh Mula : 23th Mar. 2015

PROFICIENCY II (WAJ3031) Tarikh Serahan :
Task 1: 30th Mar. 2015
Task 2: 27th Apr. 2015
Program PROGRAM PERSEDIAAN Tahun / Semester Year 1 / SEMESTER 2
IJAZAH SARJANA MUDA
PERGURUAN (PSV)
PENDIDIKAN RENDAH
Kumpulan PPISMP TESL
Disediakan oleh TENAGA PENGAJAR LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT

Disahkan Oleh Ketua Komponen Ketua Jabatan

Markhantan Murugiah Pn Hjh Noriah Talib
Nama & Tandatangan

Tarikh : 12 th Mar. 2015

 INSTITUT PENDIDIKAN GURU KAMPUS BAHASA ANTARABANGSA
JADUAL SPESIFIKASI TUGASAN

JABATAN : BAHASA INGGERIS

MATAPELAJARAN : LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT (TSL 1054)
KUMPULAN : PISMP AMBILAN JUN 2014
SEMESTER: DUA
Date Set Task 1: 23th Mar. 2015 Date of Submission Task 1: 30th Mar. 2015
Task 2: 31st Mar. 2014 Task 2: 27th Apr. 2015

Course Learning Outcomes

1. Understand and apply the different types of language structures and word classes.
2. Listen critically and respond appropriately to various stimuli.
3. Read for meaning and understand a variety of text & give a personal response.
4. Write well-reasoned and coherent paragraphsfor different text types in academic writing.
5. Assess own language grogress through written reflections.

This project is for evaluating the learning outcomes 3, 4 and 5

Objectives of Coursework :

To enable students to:

 present an effective oral presentation pertaining to selected theme.

 read critically and synthesize academic texts and select relevant points.
 write a critical response to the issue/issues highlighted in the text.
Coursework (100%)

Detailed requirements for assignment:

1. No duplication of assignment from other coursework is allowed.

2. Plagiarism is strictly prohibited.
3. You should adhere to the deadline. Without an approved extension of time, late submission will be downgraded to the next
band

Specifications / Coursework Tasks Weighting Notes

title
TASK 1  Individually, present orally the topic on education. 40%  The task assesses students’ ability to
ORAL PRESENTATION  Your presentation should not be more than 7 synthesize and analyze the information
Present orally the topic on slides with not more than 30 words on each from various sources.
education slide.
( Individual Task)  Students are also required to present
You are given 7 minutes for your oral their analysis via a PowerPoint
presentation. presentation thus evaluating their
 You are encouraged to utilize graphics to aid your speaking as well as presentation skills
presentation.

TASK 2
CRITICAL RESPONSE
Write a report based on Task 1
(Individual Task)
 Individually, write a report based on Task 1 40%  The task assesses students’ ability to
 The length of the report should be between 800 to synthesize and analyze the
1000 words  information from various sources.
 Language
 Organization
 Maturity of arguments
- development of ideas
- independent and critical
thought
- references to related
literature

PROJEK (TUGASAN SATU – ORAL / POWERPOINT PRESENTATION)
PROGRAM: PISMP
MAJOR: PENDIDIKAN SENI VISUAL
KOD KURSUS/SUBJEK: WAJ 3031
MARKS / LEVEL OF
ACHIEVEMENT DISTINCTION
18 - 20
ASSESSMENT
CRITERIA
 Excellent level of
presentation: insightful,
systematic with distinct
outline, well-organized,
and very well delivered.
Content
Very clear and well
supported arguments
with evidence from
readings.
 Impressive level of
language and stylistic
proficiency.
Language
 Efficient resource
management and
effective resource
Presentation support.
GRID KRITERIA PEMARKAHAN UMUM
2015
SEMESTER: 2 (JAN 2015)
TAJUK KURSUS/ MATAPELAJARAN: ENGLISH LANGUAGE
PROFICIENCY II
PASS MARGINAL PASS
CREDIT FAIL
10 - 13 5-9
14 - 17 0-4
 Good level of  Satisfactory level of  Basic level of  Poor presentation with an
presentation with a clear presentation with a presentation with gaps in inadequate outline. Mere
outline. Adequate general outline. Support the general outline. mention of argument(s)
support of arguments arguments with little Support arguments with with inadequate or no
with some evidence from evidence from readings. limited evidence from evidence from readings.
readings. readings.
 Good level of language  Satisfactory level of  Adequate level of  Poor level of language
proficiency: content language proficiency language proficiency with proficiency which affects
presented fluently; some with some errors which some errors which audience engagement.
errors but these do not do not hamper occasionally hamper
significantly impede communication. communication.
communication.
 Reasonably fair resource  Generally fair resource  Inadequate resource  Poor and disorganized
management and management and management and resource management
support. support. support. and support.
 GRID KRITERIA PEMARKAHAN UMUM
PROJEK (TUGASAN DUA – WRITING A CRITICAL RESPONSE )
2015
PROGRAM: PISMP SEMESTER: 2 (JAN 2015)
MAJOR: PENDIDIKAN SENI VISUAL TAJUK KURSUS/ MATAPELAJARAN: ENGLISH LANGUAGE
PROFICIENCY II
KOD KURSUS/SUBJEK: WAJ 3031

Catatan: Kriteria-kriteria yang berkenaan di bawah sesuai dengan keperluan.

LEVEL / EXCELLENT GOOD SATISFACTORY ADEQUATE WEAK

(PASS 80%-100%) (PASS 65% - 79%) (PASS 50% -64%) (PASS 40% -49%) (FAIL 0 – 39%)

CRITERIA
CONTENT  Extensive detailed and  Sound and current  Satisfactory  Adequate knowledge  Superficial or
(30%) current knowledge is knowledge is exhibited awareness of relevant  Adequate coverage of inaccurate knowledge
evident  Good coverage of knowledge with some content but partially  Insufficient coverage of
 Excellent coverage of content gaps irrelevant content and mostly
content  Satisfactory coverage irrelevant
of content

CRITICAL  Very clear evidence of  Clear evidence of  Some evidence of  Adequate evidence of  Hardly any evidence of
RESPONSE conceptual conceptual conceptual conceptual conceptual
(30%) understanding understanding understanding understanding understanding
 Lucid and convincing  Arguments are  Argument is  Adequate argument  Argument is
argument generally well adequately supported but lack supporting unconvincing and has
 Excellent analysis and organized with evidence but with evidence and with hardly any supporting
synthesis of  Good analysis and a few significant lapses significant limitations evidence
information synthesis of  Satisfactory analysis  Adequate analysis and  Poor critical analysis
information and synthesis of synthesis of and synthesis of
information information content

ORGANISATION  Arguments and  Information well-  Information  Information fairly  Information

(5%) information are very organized satisfactorily organized satisfactorily organized haphazardly organized
well-organized  Clear structure with  Satisfactory structure  Fairly satisfactory  Poor structure
 A very clear structure each section logically with some sections structure with more
with each section related to others logically related to frequent repetition
related to the others others
 LEVEL / EXCELLENT GOOD SATISFACTORY ADEQUATE WEAK
(PASS 80%-100%) (PASS 65% - 79%) (PASS 50% -64%) (PASS 40% -49%) (FAIL 0 – 39%)

CRITERIA
LANGUAGE  Excellent use of  Generally accurate  Fairly accurate and  Sufficient vocabulary  Limited and/or
(30%) extensive range of and a good range of adequate range of  Communicates inappropriate
vocabulary and vocabulary vocabulary adequately vocabulary
structures  Communicates  Communicates quite  Significant errors in  Communication is
 Communicates very effectively and well spelling and grammar limited due to poor
effectively and efficiently  Some errors in spelling control of the language
efficiently  Few errors in spelling and grammar  Gross errors in spelling
 Hardly any errors in and grammar and grammar
spelling and grammar

SUPPORTING  Excellent and relevant  Good and relevant  Satisfactory references  Lack references  Hardly any references
MATERIALS & references indicating references indicating indicating reading of  Limited evidence of  Little or no evidence of
REFERENCES extensive reading wide reading beyond relevant texts reading reading
(5%)  Referencing adheres  Referencing does not  There are numerous
beyond basic texts basic texts
 Referencing adheres  Referencing adheres loosely to the correct adhere to the correct errors with referencing
fully to the correct closely to the correct academic conventions academic conventions  Does not adhere to the
academic conventions academic conventions correct academic
conventions

Note to evaluators

Task Initial Weightage Marking Scheme After Conversion

One (PowerpointPresentation) 20 % convert to 40% as the marking 40%

scheme is based on 20%

Two (Critical Response) 100% convert to 40% as the marking 40%

scheme is based on 100%
Three (Quiz) 20% 20% 20%

TOTAL 100%