Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Project Proposal:
Prepared by:
Walelign Girma, Consultant on Renewable Energies, M.Sc
Table of Content
1. Background................................................................................................................................2
2. Justification................................................................................................................................3
2.1. Economics of solar water pumping...................................................................................3
2.2. Which energy investment - generator or solar?...............................................................4
3. Beneficiaries:............................................................................................................................10
4. Objectives:................................................................................................................................12
5. Expected results:......................................................................................................................12
6. Activities:..................................................................................................................................13
7. Project schedule:......................................................................................................................14
8. Project budget:.........................................................................................................................15
9. Project financing:.....................................................................................................................16
10. Organization and administration:........................................................................................17
Reference:.....................................................................................................................................17
Table 1: Scenario for different solar pumping designs based on capacity of the system to
meet different population demand...............................................................................................5
Table 2: Financial analysis comparing solar and diesel energy.................................................7
Table 3: Advantage and disadvantage of solar energy and generator......................................8
Table 4:.Estimate of foreign currency saved from solar pumping system 2 Kw replacing
generator,2.5 Kw..........................................................................................................................11
1. Background
Afar National Regional State is a region where national grid electric supply
system is rarely existed while generators are most commonly used form of
energy for water supply system. However, the region lying in a Great Rift
Valley of Ethiopia is endowed with plentiful resource of solar energy. It is in
the first highest solar radiation category of regions in Ethiopia, as the
Ethiopian Tourism Organization slogan implies, “Ethiopia a nation of 13
months of sunshine”. Based on data from Ethiopia Rural Energy
Development and Promotion Center (ERDPC), the area of most Ethiopian Rift
valley area has an average solar radiation falling 6.0 – 6.5 Kwh/m 2/day.This
solar energy is a remarkable and sustainable form of renewable energy in
the region which could well meet the demand of solar water pumping
requirements for water supply and livestock watering projects.
Water as an essential element for living, most people in the rural setting of
Afar National Regional State is lacking access to sufficient water supply and
also has to walk a long distance to fetch the water from river or if there is
well, they use a traditional way of water lifting and spend a lot of time.
Hence renewable energy - like solar energy - is very crucial for off-grid
sustainable and reliable electric energy supply for solar water pumping in the
region.
2. Justification
Energy is the most important and key component of economic and social
well being of a country or a region. Secured supplies of water for the
pastoral sector necessitate secure supplies of energy for water lifting. In a
related context a major obstacle to develop water supply and sanitation
project in the region has been the lack of an energy source to move water.
Water, where available, is typically collected through laborious time
consuming manual methods for general family use. Also the commonly used
pumps driven by fuel-burning generators have proven to be often defective
and unsustainable and unreliable in terms of operation and maintenance for
the longest operational life. Moreover, diesel generators used commonly for
water pumping have limitation on their volatile fuel price coupled with
unreliability. A generator also requires regular follow up and maintenance
which increases running cost. However, unlike generators, solar energy
modules are maintenance free with an average of 25 years defect free
guarantee. It only requires cleaning the surface from dust and dirt materials.
Hence, in a promising solar energy potential spot like Afar region, solar
pumping energy will be a better optional reliable renewable energy for water
supply and sanitation projects.
Water pumping and solar power are natural partners that create economic
solutions for any remote community’s water delivery application like Afar
region. Solar powered pumps and systems are changing the way water is
delivered to livestock and people when utility service is expensive, unreliable
or non-existent. The economy and reliability of solar electric power make it
an excellent choice for remote water pumping. Remotely scattered
pastoralists in Afar region can be enthusiastic and potential solar pump users
if they could get the chance to use the solar pumping energy system. The
main water sources - Awash River - is spread over many kilometers of
rangeland where electricity is non- existed and refueling and maintenance
costs of generators are substantial. Hence, for water source so far away and
scattered from powerline (grid electric supply), solar energy is a favorable
economic choice. A solar pump minimizes future costs and uncertainties and
its fuel is free. Moving parts are reduced to as few as one. A few spare parts
can assure many years of reliable water supply at near-zero operating costs.
Generators are commonly used to provide power beyond the grid line
electricity. There are several economic studies concerning the economics of
solar versus generators as a power choice. These studies consider all costs
involved: modules, mounting structure, pumps, miscellaneous components,
installation, operation, maintenance, yearly inspection, component
replacement and salvage value. With this it possible to determine a life
cycles cost and a present value. One such comparison was done by the
Bureau of Land Management at Battle Mountain, Nevada (the desert part of
US) specifically comparing solar water pumping systems. For a system of 1.0
lit/s with a 92 meter design head, the solar system cost only 64 % for over
20 years of what the generator system costs about 10 years. This remote
solar site is also used only 14 % of labor hours as compared to what
generator needs. Photovoltaic pumping systems in remote locations would
often be cost effective compared to generators, even with 3-4 times the
initial capital cost. Low generators, which are initially inexpensive, require
consistent maintenance and have a smaller design life. Small to medium
sized solar pumping systems often initially cost less than a durable slow
speed engine driven generator. Larger pump systems initially cost more than
generator systems, but tend to be far more economical in the end.
Table 1: Scenario for different solar pumping designs based on capacity of the system to
meet different population demand
As to financial appraisal analysis, annuity method (for detail see Annex -1) is
used to compare the two energy system. To do so, a representative
community water supply system with a daily requirement of 30
m3/day,lifting water from 45 meter depth serving 1,500 people can be used
from the third column of above table analyzed. With this demand a water
supply system requires electric energy3 of approximately rounded to 4 Kwh.
For the purpose of the elaboration, the pump and control unit, including the
water tank of the water supply system can be considered to be identical for
3
E= 2.725VH, in wh,
where V is daily water demand (m3/day), H is total dynamic head (m)
the two energy systems. Attendance and maintenance will be required for
the motor and pump, and general supervision of the system will be needed
in both cases.
To provide this amount of electricity in Afar area with a daily radiation of 6.0
kWh/m2/day, an array (modules) with an output4 of 2,000 Wp (Watt peak)
would be required. The installed cost would be about Birr 274,000 - with
practical experience of no additional charges for repair or maintenance of the
array is needed, and a lifetime of 20 years for the system, and an annual
interest rate at 8.5 percent, it is calculated that the annual cost of solar
pumping is about Birr 37,100.
No fuel needed
Easy to install
3. Beneficiaries:
The beneficiaries of the solar water pumping project will be:
Mainly targeted beneficiaries are women and girls. The project saves a
woman's or a girl' time everyday in each family for fetching water that can
be used for more productive work such as for income generating, social
awareness and environment conservation programs, and girls can use their
time for other homework activities. It also contributes to the sustainable
b) Environmental impact
Using solar water pumping in place of diesel fuel contributes in reducing local
as well as national level greenhouse gas emissions by displacing the
consumption of diesel fuel. The solar energy used in a sustainable basis
assures the CO2, associated with diesel combustion will be reabsorbed in the
process of the growth of the fodder and food for the animals. CO 2 emissions
that are associated with the combustion of fuel can be accounted as being
displaced when replaced by solar system. According to guidelines from
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), emission coefficient to
the atmosphere from diesel fuel combustion is about 2.5 tones of CO 2 per
1000 liter of fuel. The CO2 emission savings available from the using of
single solar pumping system replacing 2.5 Kw diesel generator- average
1000 liters of fuel consumption per year - is roughly approximated at 2.5
tones of carbon dioxide equivalent . While projecting this figure into 20 years
of solar energy operational years, the environmental benefits on avoided CO 2
equivalent emission will be estimated at 50 tones.
c) Financial benefits
The average foreign currency expenditure saving on diesel fuel while using
2000 Wp solar water pumping in place of 2.5 Kw generator could roughly
estimated in the table below.
Table 4:.Estimate of foreign currency saving from solar pumping system, 2000 Wp
replacing 5 kw generator
4. Objectives:
5. Expected results:
5
A generator with a capacity of 2.5 Kw running for two hours a day consumes about 1080 liter of diesel fuel per
year.Diesel fuel price is taken as 7.15 Birr/liter.One US dollar exchange rate at 12.00 Et. Birr
Sustainable and reliable energy supply to the water supply system for
the prolonged time without hassle for maintenance and replacements
for rural setting,
Saving of time -up to 3 hours - for women and girls for fetching water,
Improved health and sanitation condition so as less number of patients
with water borne diseases,
Reliable water supply for domestic and livestock production thereby
improves sustainable development for pastoral farming,
Environmental benefits will be attained with zero CO2 emission,
Foreign hard -currency expenditure for diesel fuel will be saved.
Local and regional technical training on the new solar energy
technology will be improved and contribute to the future development
of the region’s energy sector
6. Activities:
Once the borehole drilling and pumping tests in the anticipated rural water
supply project has been accomplished, the data will be used to precisely
design the solar water pumping system. Detailed survey and study for the
project will also be carried out. Meanwhile, in the initiative of Afar Water
Works Construction Enterprise (AWWCE), the fund will be raised and
secured. The office of AWWCE also expected to take initiative to install solar
water pumping system as parts of its allocated budget for commonly used
generators.
All the components will be transported to the site. Construction work will be
done with maximum involvement of local labor under supervision. Maximum
resources and construction material will be used from the locality. After
erection, testing and commissioning, an operator selected by local users'
committee will be given a training to operate and maintain the whole
system. Then it will be handed over to the local users' committee.
In overall view, major activities categories in the solar pumping project are
expected to include:
1. Implementation plan,
2. Guiding Local community Users' Committee,
3. Detailed survey, design, estimate,
4. Guiding and supervise suppliers/installer selection,
5. Supervise construction/installation works,
6. Project management,
7. Project schedule:
8. Project budget:
Breakdown of costs is done based on solar pumping system design for 1,500
people6 demanding water at 30 m3 per day and a solar power of 2,000 Wp
(Peak watts). The preliminary estimate which includes set of solar pumping
Equipment (modules/panels, Pump unit, Control unit, Cables, mounting
structures etc.) : Birr 273,455
While this proposed budget has attempted to emphasize on the set of solar
pumping equipment requirement, detailed budget requirement including
consulting personnel will be included during detail studies and design at
implementation phase of the project.
9. Project financing:
6
The same number of community i.e 1,500, which is taken for the financial appraisal analysis.
both in its core program or the GEF. Recent policy expresses increased
interest in focusing on renewable energy, including:
Reference:
Annex 1: Annuity method (Static -cost annuity): time adjusted methods of investment
appraisal
Objective:
Abbreviation: aco
Equation: aco= Cr+ ( I0+ L). CRF + L. i
where:
Cr = annual running costs
I0 = Investment
L = liquidation yield
CRF7i, n = Capital Recovery Factor, for a determined interest rate i and
period n
i = interest rate
n = period of operation of the system
As the liquidation yield is only due at the end of the investment period,
interest has to be calculated each year. The capital of the liquidation yield is
tied-up until the project's end.
If the running costs Cr are assumed to be the same each year, the cost
annuity is "dynamic", as no time adjustment of running costs is necessary. If
running costs are a mean value of different annual costs, the cost annuity
gives a mixed (static-dynamic) result.
Example:
This result could now be compared with the cost annuity of other
energy technologies, e.g. a grid connection or a diesel generator.
The technology with the lowest cost annuity is the most
feasible energy option.
Annex 2: Solar water pumping projects from Somali and Amhara National Regions
Solar water pumping projects from nearby regions like Somali National
Regional State and Amhara National Regional state could offer a good
technical and knowledge sharing experience.
Solar water pumping project powered by 2.2 Kw solar energy in Somali region, Cheriti,
Negele Borena
Community water supply project powered by solar energy, Somali Region,Negele Borena
Htotal=100 m
Benefiieries=3,000
Htotal= 45 m
Benefiieries=3,000
Htotal= 80 m
Benefiieries=2,500