A 2009 meta-analysis of 41 studies found that CCTV surveillance cameras were associated with an average 16% reduction in crime. The largest effect was seen in car parks, where crime was reduced by 51% on average. CCTV schemes in other public settings like city centers and public transportation had smaller and statistically insignificant effects, reducing crime by 7% and 23%, respectively. The majority of the decrease accounted for in the analysis came from studies in the United Kingdom. However, some researchers have argued that methodological issues like lack of control for other security measures introduced simultaneously and potential selection bias limit the reliability of the results.
Original Description:
Explore The Importance Of CCTV's And Visit Our Website To Know More
http://milestonesystem.in/
A 2009 meta-analysis of 41 studies found that CCTV surveillance cameras were associated with an average 16% reduction in crime. The largest effect was seen in car parks, where crime was reduced by 51% on average. CCTV schemes in other public settings like city centers and public transportation had smaller and statistically insignificant effects, reducing crime by 7% and 23%, respectively. The majority of the decrease accounted for in the analysis came from studies in the United Kingdom. However, some researchers have argued that methodological issues like lack of control for other security measures introduced simultaneously and potential selection bias limit the reliability of the results.
A 2009 meta-analysis of 41 studies found that CCTV surveillance cameras were associated with an average 16% reduction in crime. The largest effect was seen in car parks, where crime was reduced by 51% on average. CCTV schemes in other public settings like city centers and public transportation had smaller and statistically insignificant effects, reducing crime by 7% and 23%, respectively. The majority of the decrease accounted for in the analysis came from studies in the United Kingdom. However, some researchers have argued that methodological issues like lack of control for other security measures introduced simultaneously and potential selection bias limit the reliability of the results.
A 2009 systematic review by researchers from Northeastern
University and University of Cambridge used meta-analytic techniques to pool the
average effect of CCTV on crime across 41 different studies.[21] The results indicated that CCTV caused a significant reduction of crime by on average 16%. The largest effects of CCTV were found in car parks, where cameras reduced crime by on average 51%. CCTV schemes in other public settings had small and non-statistically significant effects on crime: 7% reduction in city and town centers and 23% reduction in public transport settings. When sorted by country, systems in the United Kingdom accounted for the majority of the decrease; the drop in other areas was insignificant. The studies included in the meta-analysis used quasi-experimental evaluation designs that involve before-and-after measures of crime in experimental and control areas.[21] However, several researchers have pointed to methodological problems associated with this research literature. First, researchers have argued that the British car park studies included in the meta-analysis cannot accurately control for the fact that CCTV was introduced simultaneously with a range of other security- related measures.[22] Second, some have noted that, in many of the studies, there may be issues with selection bias since the introduction of CCTV was potentially endogenous to previous crime trends.[23] In particular, the estimated effects may be biased if CCTV is introduced in response to crime trends.[24]