Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Historical
Carbon fibers have been made inadvertently from natural cellulosic fibers such as
cotton or linen for thousands of years.
However, it was Thomas Edison who, in 1978, purposely took cotton fibers and later,
bamboo, and converted them into carbon in his quest for incandescent lamp filaments.
Interest in carbon fibers was renewed in late 1950s when synthetic rayons in textile
forms were carbonized to produce carbon fibers for high temperature missile
applications.
The technical and commercial breakthrough for high performance carbon fibers
started in the late 1960s after introduction of the PAN process, which turned out to be
more economical due to higher carbon yields, which is 50% against 30% for rayon,
and simpler fabrication process. PAN based fibers also had superior physical
properties compared to rayon based fibers. PAN fiber is today recognized as the most
important and promising precursor for manufacture of high strength carbon fibers.
Later carbon fibers were also prepared from pitch, a very cheap precursor. The most
commonly used pitches are those obtained from petroleum, asphalt, coal tar, and PVC.
The properties of pitch carbon fibers are generally inferior to PAN carbon fibers
because, if not specially treated, the pitches are usually isotropic before pyrolysis, and
the isotropy is maintained in the fibers unless the orientation of the larger planes is
carried out under tension during the high temperature treatment, between 2000 and
3000 ±C.
Carbon fibers offer the highest specific modulus and highest specific strength of all
reinforcing fibers. Typical values of tensile properties of different carbon fibers are given in
Table I.
It is well known that microstructure affects fiber properties. Due to the high content of
delocalized π electrons and the parallel alignment of graphene layers along the fiber axis,
carbon fibers show good thermal and electric conductivities in the fiber direction. Their
coefficient of thermal conductivity is in the range of 21–125 W/mK, which is close to that of
metals . In the case of high modulus MP (mesophase pitch) carbon fibers, thermal
conductivity can be more than 500 W/mK at room temperature. The electric conductivity of
graphitized carbon fibers is also close to that of metals. High modulus MP carbon fibers with
a high crystal orientation generally show a higher electric conductivity than PAN carbon
fibers. One thing to be noted is that carbon fibers have a small but negative coefficient of
linear thermal expansion (CLTE) of –0.5~–2.0 × 10-6/K in the fiber axial direction. The
negative CLTE is due to the high crystalline alignment in carbon fibers. It has been reported
that with the increase of Young’s modulus in the fiber direction, the absolute value of CLTE
increased. The negative CLTE can cause residual stresses at the interface when the
composites are subject to temperature change.
The fibers do not suffer from stres corrosion or stress rupture failures at room temperatures, as
glass and organic polymer fibers do. Especially at high temperatures, the strength and
modulus are outstanding compared to other materials. Carbon fiber composites are ideally
suited to applications where strength, stiffness, lower weight, and outstanding fatigue
characteristics are critical requirements. They are also finding applications where high
temperature, chemical inertness, and high damping are important. Carbon fibers also have
good electrical conductivity, thermal conductivity, and low linear coefficient of thermal
expansion.
This is a very strange thing to find, seeing as graphite is fairly soft and flakey, whereas
carbon fibre is strong and requires large forces to fracture. The structure does however explain
a few similarities between the two in that they are both brittle and, importantly, both are
chemically inert and therefore unreactive. It also explains how at very high temperatures of
2500oC, carbon fibre can be directly converted into graphite. The major differences between
the two can be explained by looking at their structures, not at an atomic scale, but at how the
individual strands / sheets are arranged. In graphite, large layers of the structure above lie one
on top of the other, with weak interactions between the layers. In carbon fibre however, they
do still lie one on top of the other, but are less ordered. Basically, the sheets fold within an
individual fibre. This is the main, crucial difference between the two and can be used to
explain why carbon fibre can be converted into graphite. The reason is that graphite is a much
more ordered structure, so is energetically more stable.
References