Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Group 10
Production of Isopropyl Alcohol (2-Propanol)
Process Routes:
(C𝐻3 )2 𝐶𝐻𝑂𝐻
(C𝐻3 )2 𝐶𝐻𝑂𝑆𝑂3 𝐻 + [(C𝐻3 )2 𝐶𝐻𝑂]2 𝑆𝑂2 → 2[(C𝐻3 )2 𝐶𝐻]2 𝑂 +
2𝐻2 𝑆𝑂4
Disadvantage 1. The process suffers from high corrosion rates and disposal problems
with water, acid, caustic and off-gas wastes
2. high energy costs,
-The hydrolysis step yields a dilute aqueous
sulfuric acid solution, which is regenerated by submerged combustion.
-The high temperatures involved in this process result in high energy
costs as well as corrosive damage.
3. pollution problems.
-During the regeneration of the sulfuric acid, large amounts of
so2 are given off. This compound is an environmental nuisance from the
standpoint of air pollution.
-Also, large amounts of waste water are generated which must be
treated before disposal. These factors add to the capital and operating
costs.
Process: Indirect Hydration (Strong Acid Process)
Temperature (℃) 20-30
Pressure (MPa) 1.0-1.2MPa
Feedstock 0.8t propene, 0.35t 𝐻2 𝑆𝑂4, 3.5t steam, and zeolites beta catalyst
are required for production 1t of 2-propanol
Selectivity ( wt%) >90
Reaction First Step: A mixture of mono- and diisopropyl sulfate esters is formed
from reaction of propene with sulfuric acid. The reaction is exothermic,
yielding about 50kJ/mol.
(C𝐻3 )2 𝐶𝐻𝑂𝐻
(C𝐻3 )2 𝐶𝐻𝑂𝑆𝑂3 𝐻 + [(C𝐻3 )2 𝐶𝐻𝑂]2 𝑆𝑂2 → 2[(C𝐻3 )2 𝐶𝐻]2 𝑂 +
2𝐻2 𝑆𝑂4
𝐶𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑦𝑠𝑡
C𝐻3 𝐶𝐻=𝐶𝐻2 + 𝐻2 𝑂 ⇔ (C𝐻3 )2 𝐶𝐻𝑂𝐻 ∆𝐻 = −50𝑘𝐽/𝑚𝑜𝑙
𝐶𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑦𝑠𝑡
C𝐻3 𝐶𝐻=𝐶𝐻2 + 𝐻2 𝑂 ⇔ (C𝐻3 )2 𝐶𝐻𝑂𝐻 ∆𝐻 = −50𝑘𝐽/𝑚𝑜𝑙
𝐶𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑦𝑠𝑡
C𝐻3 𝐶𝐻=𝐶𝐻2 + 𝐻2 𝑂 ⇔ (C𝐻3 )2 𝐶𝐻𝑂𝐻 ∆𝐻 = −50𝑘𝐽/𝑚𝑜𝑙
Disadvantage 1. Require high propene recycle (less than 10% conversion per pass)
2. High utility cost
3. requires a pure propylene feed
Process: Hydrogenation of Acetone
Temperature (℃) 120
Pressure (MPa) 196kPa
Feedstock 1. acetone
2. Raney-nickel catalyst or copper oxide-chromium oxide
30,000 metric
tons/year of IPA in
operation since June
1972 at Tokuyama Soda
Co Ltd
Features of High reaction rate & High activity & Requires quality of
process provide large amount of selectivity to hydrate propylene gas (45wt%)
product propylene to IPA
2 steps reaction –
High cost in preparation Long life span of Reaction of propylene
of catalyst catalyst gas with sulphuric acid
& reaction of water to
Requires high pressure Requires high quality of hydrolyses
in the operation propylene (~99wt%) intermediate product
Regeneration of
sulphuric acid produce
sulphuric dioxide that
causes environmental
effect
Propylene is flammable
gas
Production 100 000 metric tons of 30 000 metric tons of 2.8 million pounds of
IPA/year IPA/year IPA/year
Total operation 1002.96 USD + 7595.6 USD + 100.0 USD + 1083.0 USD =
( 1 tonne /raw materials ) 9781.56 USD
Direct Hydration Costing
Hydrogenation of Acetone
Cost of direct Hydration and Hydrogenation of Acetone is 26.5% and 113% higher than
indirect Hydration respectively
Comparing three process routes for the production of isopropyl alcohol by the establishment,
feature of process, unit operation, safety and environmental impact and the production, it is
shown that the direct hydration of propylene has the promising potential for an economically
practical route to isopropyl alcohol. Furthermore, direct hydration of propylene is widely used in
industries and is a more establish way to obtain isopropyl alcohol compared to hydrogenation of
acetone and indirect hydration of propylene. These three processes require catalyst in the
reaction, but preparing catalyst for hydrogenation of acetone is more expensive compared to
direct and indirect hydration of propylene. In term of life span of catalyst, direct hydration of
propylene is better. In term of environmental impact, indirect hydration uses sulphuric acid as
the catalyst which may cause harm to the environment thus this process is not chosen as it is not
environmental friendly and require a lot of cost to treat waste product. Besides, hydrogenation
of acetone is not chosen as the acetone is highly flammable which may give out explosion if not
handle carefully. Last but not least, when the cost of three processes are compared, it can be see
that direct hydration is cheaper than hydrogenation of acetone and is slightly higher than indirect
hydration. Thus, based on technical feasibility study, economic feasibility study as well as safety
issue, direct hydration of propylene is chosen.
Among the three processes of direct hydration of propylene, high temperature process is
favorable. This is because it has the highest selectivity and conversion per pass when compared
to low temperature and vapor phase process.
Direct hydration of Propylene (High Temperature) developed by Tokuyama Soda
The process that had been developed by Tokuyama Soda at the end of 1972
First commercial plant which having a capacity of 30 000 metric tons of isopropyl alcohol
were produced.
Technical Feasibility study:
Criteria Elaboration
Raw Material 1. Propylene gas (about 95%)
2. Catalyst: Tungsten oxide in liquid phase
- Highly active and remarkably selective for the
specific process
- Very stable (resistant to hydrolysis)
- Spend longer in continuous operation
- Able to give high per pass conversions of the
propylene
Unit Operation 1. Reactor ( Reaction in Liquid Phase)
- Temperature: 240 ℃ - 270℃
- Pressure: 150atm – 250atm
2. Heat Exchanger
3. Gas Separator
- To separate & recycle unconverted propylene
dissolve in solution
4. Azeotropic Column
- To separate azeotropic mixture of isopropyl alcohol
and water by separating agents
- Catalyst solution joins with water and then recycle
- Minimum boiling point of azeotrope mixture is
81℃
5. Rectifying Column
- Remove light impurities from IPA solution
6. Distillation Column (2 or 3 column)
- Benzene(separating agent) is added for further
purification
Quality of Product 1. Purity: 99.99%
2. Conversion of propylene per pass: 60% - 70%
3. Selectivity of IPA over converted propylene: 98% - 99%
By-product 1. Di-isopropyl ether
2. N-propanol
3. Propylene oligomers
***Spent gas from reactor and by-products from purification section are completely utilized as
fuel in heating system
Advantages
1. The catalyst able to maintain high activity and excellent selectivity for the process
2. Catalyst highly stable and the life time is very long
3. High conversion rate of propylene
4. Does not require high concentration of propylene
5. Small amount of by-products released (because in aqueous solution which give high
selectivity)
6. High grade of IPA easily to obtain at purification system
7. Heat loss incidental to evaporation & condensation of water can be avoid since the reaction
in liquid phase
8. Easy operation & maintenance of equipment (no corrosion)
9. Process is simple and the free from waste substance. (reduce cost in treated operation)