Communications From Elsewhere http://www.elsewhere.

org/journal/pomo/

Communications From Elsewhere

Home of RJL20

Reinventing Constructivism: The

subtextual paradigm of consensus in the
works of Joyce

C. Jean-Jean Bailey

Department of English, University of California

1. Expressions of futility

“Class is part of the absurdity of culture,” says Bataille. But if the

subtextual paradigm of consensus holds, we have to choose between
Foucaultist
power relations and capitalist desituationism.

The main theme of the works of Joyce is not narrative, as the subtextual

1 de 8 01/03/18 18:49
Communications From Elsewhere http://www.elsewhere.org/journal/pomo/

paradigm of consensus suggests, but prenarrative. In Dubliners, Joyce

examines Foucaultist power relations; in Finnegan’s Wake he analyses
neodeconstructive demodernism. It could be said that many discourses
concerning
the subtextual paradigm of consensus may be found.

In the works of Joyce, a predominant concept is the concept of capitalist

reality. The characteristic theme of von Ludwig’s[1] model
of Foucaultist power relations is the role of the participant as observer.
But
Geo�rey[2] holds that we have to choose between materialist
nationalism and the semiotic paradigm of expression.

The main theme of the works of Joyce is not appropriation, but

preappropriation. The characteristic theme of la Fournier’s[3] critique of
the subtextual paradigm of consensus is the
bridge between society and class. In a sense, if materialist nationalism
holds,
the works of Joyce are not postmodern.

Any number of narratives concerning the collapse, and eventually the

futility, of neotextual sexual identity exist. It could be said that in
Ulysses, Joyce deconstructs modern Marxism; in Finnegan’s Wake,
however, he analyses materialist nationalism.

Foucault’s essay on the subtextual paradigm of consensus implies that the

purpose of the writer is signi�cant form. Therefore, Pickett[4] suggests
that we have to choose between Foucaultist power
relations and cultural socialism.

The premise of the subtextual paradigm of consensus states that art has
signi�cance. It could be said that Lyotard uses the term ‘neosemantic
capitalist theory’ to denote not narrative, as Lacan would have it, but
postnarrative.

2 de 8 01/03/18 18:49
Communications From Elsewhere http://www.elsewhere.org/journal/pomo/

An abundance of discourses concerning Foucaultist power relations may

be
discovered. In a sense, the subject is interpolated into a submodern
appropriation that includes sexuality as a reality.

The primary theme of the works of Joyce is a capitalist paradox. It could be

said that Sartre uses the term ‘materialist nationalism’ to denote the role
of
the participant as reader.

2. The subtextual paradigm of consensus and precultural

nihilism

“Sexual identity is elitist,” says Marx. If constructivist discourse holds,

we have to choose between the subtextual paradigm of consensus and
postcultural
nationalism. In a sense, Prinn[5] suggests that the works of
Joyce are reminiscent of Joyce.

Any number of situationisms concerning the common ground between

culture and
sexual identity exist. Therefore, Bataille suggests the use of dialectic
socialism to read and analyse class.

Sartre uses the term ‘the subtextual paradigm of consensus’ to denote

not,
in fact, theory, but pretheory. However, the economy, and subsequent
de�ning
characteristic, of materialist nationalism prevalent in Joyce’s Ulysses
is also evident in Finnegan’s Wake, although in a more mythopoetical
sense.

Debord uses the term ‘the subtextual paradigm of consensus’ to denote

3 de 8 01/03/18 18:49
Communications From Elsewhere http://www.elsewhere.org/journal/pomo/

the
role of the writer as participant. It could be said that Sontag promotes the
use of precultural nihilism to attack sexism.

3. Joyce and the subtextual paradigm of consensus

In the works of Joyce, a predominant concept is the distinction between

within and without. If neotextual dialectic theory holds, we have to choose
between materialist nationalism and pretextual narrative. But the
characteristic theme of Sargeant’s[6] model of precultural
nihilism is the failure, and therefore the de�ning characteristic, of
postconstructive society.

The primary theme of the works of Joyce is not dematerialism, but

neodematerialism. Baudrillard suggests the use of materialist nationalism
to
read sexual identity. It could be said that the subtextual paradigm of
consensus holds that the establishment is fundamentally used in the
service of
the status quo.

“Class is part of the genre of language,” says Sontag. Wilson[7] suggests

that the works of Joyce are empowering. Thus,
Sartre uses the term ‘prestructural narrative’ to denote the bridge
between
sexual identity and class.

If one examines materialist nationalism, one is faced with a choice: either

reject the subtextual paradigm of consensus or conclude that
consciousness is
capable of truth, but only if Bataille’s analysis of dialectic capitalism is
valid; otherwise, Lyotard’s model of the subtextual paradigm of
consensus is

4 de 8 01/03/18 18:49
Communications From Elsewhere http://www.elsewhere.org/journal/pomo/

one of “Batailleist `powerful communication'”, and hence intrinsically

responsible for capitalism. The subject is contextualised into a materialist
nationalism that includes language as a totality. But Foucault promotes
the use
of subtextual discourse to challenge class divisions.

An abundance of deappropriations concerning precultural nihilism may be

revealed. In a sense, if Lyotardist narrative holds, we have to choose
between
the subtextual paradigm of consensus and the modern paradigm of
reality.

A number of theories concerning not discourse, but prediscourse exist.

Thus,
the premise of materialist nationalism implies that consensus is created
by the
collective unconscious.

The example of precultural nihilism intrinsic to Joyce’s Dubliners

emerges again in A Portrait of the Artist As a Young Man. In a sense,
Prinn[8] holds that we have to choose between materialist
nationalism and the postdialectic paradigm of expression.

The subject is interpolated into a precultural nihilism that includes

consciousness as a whole. Therefore, Debord uses the term ‘materialist
nationalism’ to denote the common ground between art and class.

If precultural nihilism holds, we have to choose between materialist

nationalism and Lyotardist narrative. It could be said that Sartre uses the
term ‘the capitalist paradigm of narrative’ to denote the dialectic, and
subsequent absurdity, of neomaterial society.

Reicher[9] implies that we have to choose between

materialist nationalism and presemioticist narrative. But if the subtextual

5 de 8 01/03/18 18:49
Communications From Elsewhere http://www.elsewhere.org/journal/pomo/

paradigm of consensus holds, the works of Joyce are not postmodern.

1. von Ludwig, T. N. (1978)

Materialist nationalism in the works of Glass. Panic Button
Books

2. Geo�rey, I. ed. (1995) Realities of Dialectic:

Materialist nationalism and the subtextual paradigm of consensus.
University of Oregon Press

3. la Fournier, B. F. (1972) Nationalism, materialist

nationalism and Sartreist absurdity. Panic Button Books

4. Pickett, U. ed. (1987) The Broken Door: The subtextual

paradigm of consensus and materialist nationalism. University of Georgia
Press

5. Prinn, F. A. W. (1976) Nationalism, Lyotardist

narrative and materialist nationalism. Oxford University Press

6. Sargeant, B. ed. (1993) Deconstructing Foucault:

Materialist nationalism and the subtextual paradigm of consensus.
University of California Press

7. Wilson, S. E. (1989) The subtextual paradigm of

consensus and materialist nationalism. Panic Button Books

8. Prinn, C. U. Y. ed. (1973) The Discourse of Rubicon:

Materialist nationalism and the subtextual paradigm of consensus.
University of North Carolina Press

9. Reicher, A. (1984) The subtextual paradigm of consensus

6 de 8 01/03/18 18:49
Communications From Elsewhere http://www.elsewhere.org/journal/pomo/

and materialist nationalism. Loompanics

The essay you have just seen is completely meaningless and was randomly
generated by the Postmodernism Generator. To generate another essay,
follow this link.
If you liked this particular essay and would like to return to it, follow this
link for a bookmarkable page.

The Postmodernism Generator was written by Andrew C. Bulhak using the

Dada Engine, a system for generating random text from recursive
grammars, and modi�ed very slightly by Josh Larios (this version,
anyway. There are others out there).

This installation of the Generator has delivered 17,628,637 essays since

25/Feb/2000 18:43:09 PST, when it became operational.

More detailed technical information may be found in Monash University

Department of Computer Science Technical Report 96/264: “On the
Simulation of Postmodernism and Mental Debility Using Recursive Transition
Networks“.

More generated texts are linked to from the sidebar to the right.

If you enjoy this, you might also enjoy reading about the Social Text A�air,
where NYU Physics Professor Alan Sokal’s brilliant(ly meaningless) hoax
article was accepted by a cultural criticism publication.

Communications From Elsewhere / Proudly powered by WordPress

7 de 8 01/03/18 18:49
Communications From Elsewhere http://www.elsewhere.org/journal/pomo/

loading

8 de 8 01/03/18 18:49