Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 1513–1524

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/rser

Role of renewable energy sources in environmental protection: A review
N.L. Panwar a,∗ , S.C. Kaushik b , Surendra Kothari a
a
Department of Renewable Energy Sources, College of Technology and Engineering, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur 313 001, India
b
Center for Energy Studies, Indian Institute of Technology – Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi 110 016, India

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t

Article history: Renewable technologies are considered as clean sources of energy and optimal use of these resources
Received 12 August 2010 minimize environmental impacts, produce minimum secondary wastes and are sustainable based on
Accepted 12 November 2010 current and future economic and social societal needs. Sun is the source of all energies. The primary forms
Available online 12 January 2011
of solar energy are heat and light. Sunlight and heat are transformed and absorbed by the environment
in a multitude of ways. Some of these transformations result in renewable energy flows such as biomass
Keywords:
and wind energy. Renewable energy technologies provide an excellent opportunity for mitigation of
Greenhouse gases
greenhouse gas emission and reducing global warming through substituting conventional energy sources.
CO2 mitigation
Sustainable development
In this article a review has been done on scope of CO2 mitigation through solar cooker, water heater, dryer,
Renewable energy sources biofuel, improved cookstoves and by hydrogen.
© 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Contents

1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1513
2. Renewable energy sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1514
3. Climate change scenario . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1514
4. Solar energy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1515
4.1. Solar thermal application . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1515
4.2. Solar thermal power . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1516
4.3. Solar photovoltaic system . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1516
5. Wind energy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1517
6. Bioenergy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1517
6.1. Biogas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1517
6.2. Biodiesel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1519
6.3. Biomass gasifier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1520
6.4. Gasifier based power generation system . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1520
6.5. Improved cookstoves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1521
7. Hydrogen as fuel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1522
7.1. Production of hydrogen from biomass . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1522
8. Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1522
Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1523
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1523

1. Introduction [2,3]. Large-scale hydropower supplies 20 percent of global elec-
tricity. Wind power in coastal and other windy regions is promising
Renewable energy sources (RES) supply 14% of the total world source of energy [1,4]. Main renewable energy sources and their
energy demand [1]. RES includes biomass, hydropower, geother- usage forms are given in Table 1. RESs are also called alternative
mal, solar, wind and marine energies. The renewable are the energy sources. The share of RESs is expected to increase very signif-
primary, domestic and clean or inexhaustible energy resources icantly (30–80% in 2100) [4]. The global renewable energy scenario
by 2040 is presented in Table 2.
Sustainable development requires methods and tools to mea-
∗ Corresponding author. Tel.: +91 294 2471068; fax: +91 294 2471056. sure and compare the environmental impacts of human activities
E-mail address: nlpanwar@rediffmail.com (N.L. Panwar). for various products [7]. At present, consumption of fossil fuels

1364-0321/$ – see front matter © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.rser.2010.11.037

The overall bal- methods. The increasing concentration of greenhouse fuels has caused global warming by carbon dioxide.g. ance of effects on health is likely to be negative and populations distributed energy generation. Table 2 Global renewable energy scenario by 2040 [6]. Harvesting the renewable energy in decentral- ized manner is one of the options to meet the rural and small scale energy needs in a reliable. Renewable energy sources of 1–2 mm over the last century.310 Biomass 1080 1313 1791 2483 3271 Large hydro 22.05 0. In this paper. attempt is illustrated in Fig. waste minimization. the objec. omy.425 12.11]. implementations of renewable energy project in rural areas can water pumps create job opportunities and thus minimizing migration towards Wave Numerous designs Tidal Barrage. for example as a result of increased frequency and intensity of towards environmental improvements are becoming more politi. Renewable energy sources Many scientific studies reveal that overall CO2 levels have increased 31% in the past 200 years.4 4289 6351 Renewable energy source contribution (%) 13. tidal stream urban areas [17].19].L. geothermal energy.1514 N. to the adverse effects. and in low income countries are likely to be particularly vulnerable reduction of greenhouse gas emissions [9]. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 1513–1524 Table 1 vide energy services with zero or almost zero emissions of both air Main renewable energy sources and their usage form [5].7 . N2 O. Current situation and the role of various greenhouse gases are given in Table 3. halons. ozone. thermal power generation. The energy resources have been split into three centration of methane gas which is responsible for ozone layer categories: fossil fuels. A schematic representation of this global climate change problem tives of the Kyoto Protocol agreement [13].8 ◦ C in the last century used to produce energy again and again. hot lation. Changes ways. Climate change is one of the primary concerns for humanity in cant adverse impact on the environment. solar energy. solar dryers. gasification.964. especially in developed countries.7 47.7 266 309 341 358 Geothermal 43. solving problems of local energy and water supply.549 11.2 86 186 333 493 Small hydro 9. changes in the distribution of vector-borne diseases and is slowly moving towards seeking more sustainable production effects on the risk of disasters and malnutrition.7 44 266 542 688 Solar thermal 4. increasing digestion the standard of living and level of employment of the local popu- Geothermal Urban heating.5 2. 20 Gt of Carbon added to Renewable energy resources will play an important role in the environment since 1800 only due to deforestation and the con- world’s future. etc.5 19 49 106 189 Wind 4. industrialization of developing nations. conservation of native forests. ity of life. wind generators. affordable and environmentally is dramatically increasing along with improvements in the qual. hydrothermal. The global mean sur- [14]. wind above the baseline of 14 ◦ C.038 10.4 3 16 68 Marine (tidal/wave/ocean) 0. reduced air pollution from vehicles.1 2 24 221 784 Solar thermal electricity 0.1 0. gases such as CO2 . and are also often mately increases global mean sea levels at an average annual rate called alternative sources of energy [15]. increased floods and cally acceptable globally. Climate change scenario sive fossil fuel consumption not only leads to an increase in the rate of diminishing fossil fuel reserves. but it also has a signifi. The experience of the 2003 heat wave in Increasing consumption of fossil fuel to meet out current energy Europe showed that high-income countries may also be adversely demands alarm over the energy crisis has generated a resurgence of affected [21]. was made with the overall pollution prevention targets. 2001 2010 2020 2030 2040 Total consumption (million tons oil equivalent) 10. renewable resources and nuclear resources depletion has more than doubled since then. and increase of the world population. To acetylnitrate in the atmosphere is acting to trap heat radiated from monitor emission of these greenhouse emissions an agreement Earth’s surface and is raising the surface temperature of Earth [22]. implementation of the obligations Solar Solar home system. biomass energy. Panwar et al. It may affect health through a range of path- health risks and the threat of global climate change [8]. reduction in cold related deaths. water of the countries with regard to fulfilling the international agree- heaters ments relating to environmental protection [16]. Renewable energy sources are those resources which can be face temperature has increased by 0. The potentially most important environmental prob- interest in promoting renewable alternatives to meet the develop. Renewable energy system devel- Energy source Energy conversion and usage options opment will make it possible to resolve the presently most crucial Hydropower Power generation tasks like improving energy supply reliability and organic fuel econ- Modern biomass Heat and power generation. Increasing global temperature ulti- energy. ensuring sustainable development of the remote regions in dry rock the desert and mountain zones.1 15 66 244 480 Photovoltaic 0.6 23.745.6 34. 2. decreased in extent by 10–15% in summer since the 1950s [25]. 3. power generation.4 3 20 Total RES 1. therefore.352 13. Society droughts.4–0. Development and Wind Power generation. 1. e. Excessive use of fossil the greenhouse effect). solar cookers Direct solar Photovoltaic.5 1.1 0. windmills. heat waves. resulting in increased the 21st century [20]. and peroxy- renewable promotion of clean energy is eagerly required [12]. various greenhouse gases. lem relating to energy is global climate change (global warming or ing world’s growing energy needs [10. Arctic sea ice thinned by 40% and that meet domestic energy requirements have the potential to pro. CFCs.365. pollutants and greenhouse gases. It has long been recognized that this exces. sustainable way [18. CH4 . has been made to find out the scope of renewable energy gadgets Table 3 reveals Humankind is contributing with a great many to meet out energy needs and mitigation potential of greenhouse economic activities to the increase atmospheric concentration of gases mainly carbon dioxide.6 16. pyrolysis.

mated that a domestic solar water heating system of 100 l per day capacity can mitigate around 1237 kg of CO2 emissions in a year 4. OECD 9031 10.00023 5. Total energy-related emissions.L. 1. out of them box type solar cooker (Fig. hygienic and sanitary conditions mal energy is the most abundant one and is available in both to national and international standards with zero energy costs.0 1 13 ± 3 R-12 20.000 0 0. It direct as well as indirect forms. roughly 16. Table 3 Role of different substances in the greenhouse effect [24]. offers significant projects a faster growth rate of CO2 emissions for the period to protection to the environment and should be employed whenever 2020. Panwar et al.8 × 1014 kW is inter- CO2 emission by region (million tons of CO2 [28].0 8 15 ± 5 N2 O 250 0.8 × 1023 kW.25 0.4 71 50 ± 5 CH4 25 0. The outlook the hot water needs of a family of four persons. prevented [33]. A study was conducted Industry contributes directly and indirectly (through electricity in Costa Rica and in the world as a whole.35 0. occupies less area. N. Solar energy is a promising option capable of being one Rest of the world 1436 4791 8034 11. is around 12–14 There is ample scope to minimize emission of greenhouse gases if months. Solar thermal application in Fig. at 2.732 22. 2) is widely used all over the world. etc.163 of the leading energy sources for cooking [30–32]. of advantages and limitations of solar ovens with conventional fire- which over 80% is from energy use.763 13. the developing countries could possible in order to achieve a sustainable future [35]. Table 4 reveals that over the period from 1971 to 1995.500 0 0. and then compared the consumption) about 37% of the global greenhouse gas emissions.75 1. The Sun emits energy at a rate saves energy.65 1. even if used 6–8 months a year. suitable to satisfy most of emissions grew at an average rate of 1. It is esti- account for half of global CO2 emissions.7% per year. The payback period of a common hot box which were 9.427 14. A schematic illustration of greenhouse effect [23]. improves product quality.00040 5.2 18 9 ± 2 R-11 17.150 31. have grown by 65% since 1971 [26].0 2 13 ± 3 Table 4 of 3. CO2 Solar water heater of domestic size.9 Gt CO2 in 2004. water heating. .37]. Solar energy at 50% capacity utilization and in hot and sunny region it is about 1410. 3 Solar-drying technology offers an alternative which can process As far as renewable energy sources is concerned solar ther. There is vast scope to utilize available solar 1971 1995 2010 2020 energy for thermal applications such as cooking. time.1. type solar oven. cepted by the earth [29]. By 2020. the vegetables and fruits in clean. A schematic of solar water heater is illustrated 4. of which.189 37.2% per year. Transition economic 3029 3135 3852 4465 Solar cooking is the most direct and convenient application of China 875 3051 5322 7081 solar energy.4 million tons of carbon dioxide per year can also be meeting route is promoted [27]. approximately 1. Substance Ability to retain Pre industrial Present concentration Annual growth rate (%) Share in the Share in the greenhouse infrared radiations concentration greenhouse effect due increase due to human compared to CO2 to human activity (%) activity (%) CO2 1 275 346 0.8 million tons of firewood can be saved and the efficient utilization of renewable energy sources in actual energy emission of 38. wood and electric stoves.5 kg [36.476 crop drying. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 1513–1524 1515 Fig. Various types World 14.848 of solar cookers are available.

parabolic dish. parabolic trough. the environmen- tal impact due to the emission of pollutants and the consumption of conventional energy resources [47]. In the last decades. Electricity production cost through solar energy is quite higher than that of conventional power station. Solar photovoltaic system Electrical energy is the pivot of all developmental efforts in both the developed and the developing nations because conven- tional energy sources are finite and fast depleting [46]. electricity directly from light without emissions. which makes use of the photovoltaic (PV) effect.44]. [48]. heliostat field collectors [45]. Panwar et al. Schematic diagram of a solar thermal conversion system.2. Solar thermal power [50. 4. The CO2 emissions tricity through the solar thermal conversion. Solar energy has [39]. Some of the losses due to the band-gap limitations are avoided by cascading semiconductors of different band-gaps. basically collected mitigation potential is higher in the case of diesel substitution as solar energy is converted to electricity through the use of some sort of heat to electricity conversion device as shown in Fig. or more than the band-gap of PV materials. compound parabolic. Fig. but solar irradiation is plentiful.51]. Fresnel lens. PV effect depends on interaction of photons. It came to around produced by PV array into AC power consistent with the voltage 14. Box type solar cooker [34]. The major component of any solar thermal system is the solar Table 5 Economics and emissions of conventional technologies compared with solar power collector. Solar thermal electricity power system is a 5. 5.1516 N. Solar thermal and solar PV systems 0 9–40 Pulverized coal–natural gas turbine 100–230 5–7 evacuated tube. Further the development in efficiency of solar cells.5 kWh m−2 is about 2085 kg from diesel operated pumps and device which utilize the solar radiation for the generation of elec- about 1860 kg from petrol operated pumps. even if current technologies are applied 4.L. over 25 days in grid connected PV systems is the inverter. 2.3. ture area can save 463 kg of carbon dioxide in life cycle embodied Silicon solar cells are perhaps the simplest and most widely used [41]. or vibra- tion. with energy equal to. A typical domestic-scale solar water heater [38]. The PV system is promis- ing source of electricity generation for energy resource saving and CO2 emission reduction. amount of material used in the solar cell and the system design for maxi- Solar energy is a very important energy source because of its mum use of recycled material will reduce the energy requirement advantages. tricity is not available. 4 [43. noise. ers that transform solar radiation energy to internal energy of the transport medium. it convert DC power per month in 11 months of operation per year.77 tons of CO2 year−1 . generation [42]. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 1513–1524 Fig. and . A historical introduction into the use of Electricity generation technology Carbon emissions Generation costs (gC/kWh) (US¢/kWh) solar energy was attempted followed by a description of the var- ious types of collectors including flat-plate. 3. There are many remote areas in the world where elec- and greenhouse gas emissions [52]. Fig. low energy density: PV modules require a large surface area for Piacentini and Mujumdar [40] estimated CO2 production for small amounts of energy generation [49]. It was estimated that 1m2 aper.8 kWp utilization of solar energy to produce electricity in these areas is solar photovoltaic pump at an average solar radiation of quite possible [42]. for space and terrestrial applications. Solar energy collectors are special kind of heat exchang. although prices are starting to come down. The primary component a drying system using 100 kWh day−1 of electricity. Further study was conducted on solar crop and power quality requirement of the utility gird as illustrated in drying and CO2 emission potential. thus the Net annual CO2 emission mitigation potential from 1. Direct solar energy conversion to electricity is conventionally done using photovoltaic cells. Sunlight is free but power generation cost is exceptionally makes the process more efficient and protects the environment high. 4. As far as carbon emission is concerned solar based power station released almost zero carbon as presented in Table 5. PV modules generate Fig. energy related problems are becoming more and more important and involve the ideal use of resources.

ronmentally beneficial technology for bioenergy production [63]. India is one of respectively. Among the raw materials are organic Wind energy for electricity production today is a mature. while ious fields of application for the biogas and digested product result a capacity of 9000 TWh/yr may be utilized due to economical and in great differences in the environmental performance among the other reasons [57]. Some changes associ- ated with climate evolution will most likely benefit the wind energy 6. The calorific value of tricity generation from wind never depletes and never increases biogas is about 16–20 MJ m−3 [67]. today by the animal breeding sector as well as the wet organic vert the motion of the wind into rotational energy that can be used waste streams represent a constant pollution risk with a poten- to drive a generator. and agricultural waste products. 5. the estimated value of net 5.1. Wind technology converts the energy manure [64]. available in wind to electricity or mechanical power through the The large amounts of animal manure and slurries produced use of wind turbines [59]. it is estimated at 2194 kg and 5713 kg. com. dedicated energy petitive. This is primarily due to low in price. for the above-mentioned two models [36]. The world-wide raw materials and digestion technologies. Biogas industry while other changes may negatively impact wind energy developments. essary to close the loops from production to utilization by optimal In the power-starved developing countries. Wind energy potential studies show For the production of biogas it is possible to use several different that the world-wide wind resources are abundant. even in remote. Wind power may prove practical for nificant advantages over other forms of bioenergy production. CO2 30–60%. Methane fermentation is a com- . ation to ensure continuity [56]. the power from the wind by means of aerodynamically designed To prevent emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG) and leaching of blades and convert it into rotating mechanical power. The electricity produced by these systems could save sev- efficiency of fuel utilization in the diesel engine pump [53]. It small power needs in isolated sites. as illustrated in Fig. Wind energy annual CO2 emission mitigation potential is the lowest (2874 kg) for GM-II model and highest (7401 kg) for SICO model in the case of Of the renewable energy technologies applied to electricity gen- diesel substitution. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 1513–1524 1517 Fig. eral billion barrels of oil and avoid many million tons of carbon and other emissions [62]. inaccessible and hilly areas [61]. Expansion of wind energy installed capacity is poised to play a key role in climate change mitigation. 7.5 m/s. compared to the petrol substitution. However. and other gases 1–5%. This variety and the var- potential for wind energy is estimated to be 26. wind power is the recycling measures [65] and it is as shown in Fig. Similarly. Grid connected photovoltaic system. The function of a wind turbine is to con. installed capacity and is experiencing rapid growth. 40–70%. Wind turbines capture tial negative impact on the environment. wind energy ranks second only to hydroelectric in terms of for the same wind speeds. 6. it has been evaluated as one of the most energy-efficient and envi- should be used in conjunction with other methods of power gener. waste from households and the food industry. such as crop residues and many areas of the world [58]. for the case of electricity substitution eration. but for maximum flexibility. At a mean wind speed of 4. viable source of electricity. if not managed optimally. wind energy 6. and virtually pollution-free technology widely used in crops.L. potential biogas systems. N. the most promising countries for wind power development in the world [54]. Panwar et al. with such ‘gains and losses’ depending on the region The production of biogas through anaerobic digestion offers sig- under consideration [55]. Bioenergy is also susceptible to global climate change.000 TWh/yr. Wind turbine nutrients and organic matter to the natural environment it is nec- blades use airfoils to develop mechanical power [60]. which can be installed and transmitted Biogas is a mixture of gases that is composed mainly of CH4 very rapidly. Elec.

and the final use of the digestates and bio- gas. The stages of the methane fermentation process [68]. acidogenesis. and hence. the digestion of the raw materials in farm-scale and large-scale biogas plants. Fig. These crops are assumed to be cultivated on set-aside arable land. the handling of raw materials. It can be distributed through the existing natural gas infrastructure and used in the same applications like the natural gas [13]. Biogas has definite advantages. . transportation fuel or distributed on the natural gas grid Fig. since it is assumed to be cultivated primarily for biogas production. 6. 8. Consequently. The biogas can directly be used for domestic cooking.1518 N. 8. Panwar et al. plex process. and none of the input used in the production of the main product. 9. Borjesson and Berglund [64] present an overview of biogas sys- tems as shown in Fig. Conversion from wind power to electrical power in a wind turbine. acetogenesis/dehydrogenation and methanation as shown in Fig. The other raw materials are assumed to be waste products. for end application [69]. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 1513–1524 Fig. which can be divided up into four phases: hydrolysis. Schematic representation of the sustainable cycle of anaerobic co-digestion of animal manure and organic wastes [66]. It include emissions from the energy input in the entire biogas production chain. 7. Handling of energy crops includes the entire energy input and emissions from the cultivation and harvesting of the crop. that is.L. even if compared to other renewable energy alternatives. It can be produced when needed and can easily be stored. the analysis does not treat the production of food or fodder replacements. the analysis includes only the additional energy input and emissions associated with the handling and trans- port of these waste products.

7 tons CO2 equiv. as its reserves are fast depleting [74].4 36. common methods used to reduce oil viscosity in the biodiesel year−1 and with the current price of US $10 tons−1 CO2 equiv. palm oil [78]. The global warming mitiga.08 46 441 Palm (Malaysia) 42. Panwar et al.” Nowa- gas is quite possible in both duel fuel mode and 100 percent biogas days. rubber seed Biogas technology provides an excellent opportunity for miti. and emissions from the system.2. and cooking and chemical fertilizers.. able. some 85–90% of of the primary chemical products of transesterification are given in world primary energy consumption will continue (until 2030) to Table 6. such oils may become. N. Biogas used peanut vegetable oil to demonstrate his invention in Paris in systems for heating was found economical viable when compared 1900. be based on fossil fuels. Biodiesel acids can catalyze the reaction by donating a proton to the carbonyl group.30 50 461 . Nevertheless. the passing years.1 524 3. thus making it more reactive. Straight vegetable oil has higher viscosity and one of the most tion potential of a family size biogas plant was 9. global warming have generated intense international interest in The use of biodiesel also reduces the particulate matter released developing alternative non-petroleum fuels for engines.3 37.94 62 431 Rapeseed (EU) 37.0 ? 485 5. creator of the diesel cycle engines. kerosene for lighting showed performance characteristics close to diesel [83]. scrubbed biogas was used in duel fuel engine as compared to raw Biodiesel is a clean burning fuel that is renewable and biodegrad- gas duel fuel engine [71].5 531 4. Biogas systems are considered to be strong alternatives to the tion. car. Pongamia pinnata oil [77]. Diesel said. industry is called transesterification [84]. coal and wood may seem negligible today. as important as oil and coal tar presently.L. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 1513–1524 1519 Fig. in mixture.75 42 433 Tallow (US) 32.3 75 525 4. The arrows represent material flows.7 65 576 3. “The use of vegetable oils as engine fuel with traditional heating systems fuelled by wood. tial benefits to human health [87]. These reactions are often catalyzed by the addi- [72]. The physical properties With reference to world energy scenario [73]. which is the largest producer of greenhouse gases. Biodiesel is being extracted from Mahua oil [75]. energy flows. oil [76].10 58 436 Tall oil (Scandinavia) 51.16 49 439 Cottonseed (China) 33. Rudolf Diesel (1858–1913).1 38. Power generation from bio.7 535 4. tion of a base and acid. A study was reported in Indian Table 6 Comparison of physical properties of vegetable oil and their methylester preparation via transesterification [86].80]. At the same time rising petroleum prices. Properties Oil or fat (refined) Methyl ester Viscosity (mm2 /s at 311 K) Cetane number Flash point (K) Viscosity (mm2 /s at 311 K) Cetane number Flash point (K) Soyabean (US) 33. Jatropha curcas gation of greenhouse gas emission and reducing global warming [79. Bases can catalyze the reaction by removing a proton from the alcohol. traditional space heating systems (stoves) in rural Turkey. providing poten- vegetable oil in internal combustion engines is not a recent innova. Transesterification is the bon credit of US $97 year−1 could be earned from such reduction in process of exchanging the alkoxy group of an ester compound by greenhouse gas emission under the clean development mechanism another alcohol. while 6.1 548 4. and dried animal waste [70]. it is known that oil is a finite resource and that its price tends run engine. Biodiesel has the potential to reduce emissions from the trans- increasing threat to the environment from exhaust emissions and port industry. thus making it more reactive [85]. The use of into the atmosphere as a result of burning fuels. In 1912. 9. The overall engine performance was improved when to increase exponentially. Overview of the biogas systems analysed.7 37. duck tallow [81] and castor seed oil [82] and its blends through substituting firewood for cooking.60 47 453 Sunflower (EU) 34.

of woody biomass. Over 3000 h of operation gasifier has resulted However.5 tons of LPG. The developed system is in position to save about nonstop mode and over 4000 h of operation replacing fossil fuel 24. by first gasifying the biomass and cleaning the gas before in a saving of about 19. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 1513–1524 context that if 10% of total production of castor seed oil is transes- terfied into biodiesel.. because the ing the study it was found that 6. which is required to be brought 50%. then about 79. The Energy and Resource Institute (TERI). The developed system is operating for about 6 h every day and consumes approx- gasifier is in position to replace 2000 l of diesel or LDO per day imately 48 kg/h of sized fuel per hours against 50 kg/h wood for completely. Biomass gasifier Gasifier is a device which converts solid fuel into gaseous fuel through thermo chemical conversion route. implying a saving of about combustion. tion. Dur. In the gasifier low grade fuel. etc. Bangalore (IISc) [100]. The gas thus produced by gasifier can be utilized to produce process heat for thermal application. Sardar Patel Renewable Energy Research Institute (SPRERI).L. as a consequence Indian premier institute like Indian Institute of Sci- Fig. There is huge scope to utilize the gasification technology in small scale industries for low tempera. 11. The CO2 released during combustion of biodiesel can be recycled through next crop production. Panwar et al. biomass gets converted in high grade fuel known as charcoal and further into low calorific gas called producer gas [98. 6. Udaipur. Required process heat Package of practice was developed by IISc. Study was conducted on open core downdraft option for the increase of energy production with the increase of gasifier in small scale industries to produce process heat in the efficiency. 20%.782 tons of CO2 emission can be saved on annual basis. Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE) has taken initiative to develop research group within India for technology and man power development.39 MW thermal capacities was car. Gasifier based power generation system ried out by Pathak et al. i. cumulative installed capacity of over 13 MWth [101]. been successfully installed in the field throughout India with a Similar design of gasifier was tested at M/s Phosphate India Pvt. The gasifier Limited. no additional burden on environment [88]. Work on development of modular throat type down draft gasifier having 1. The marigold flower with open top downdraft gasifier.4. Ltd. The system operates over 140 h per week on a nearly 11 h per day. This industry is working for concentration technologies available in India are based on downdraft gasification of about 500 l/day of phosphoric acid.5 kg of LPG was replaced by 38 kg biomass combustion products would damage the turbine blades. have been involved in the field of biomass combustion and 33 tons of CO2 . 10.3. Biomass use for power generation has become an attractive ture applications.15 tons of CO2 in 1800 working hours [106]. To disseminate the gasifica- tion technology in actual uses. . decrease of environment degradation and waste utiliza- temperature range of 200–350 ◦ C for backing bakery items. thus a promising candidate for clean development gasification technology.99]. Gas turbines cannot be fired directly with biomass.1520 N. ence. it is feasible to operate gas turbines with biomass Fig. 6. The initial gravity of acid is and designed primarily for woody biomass [102]. completely [103]. A biomass-gasifier/gas turbine combined cycle. Bangalore to dry is meeting through combustion of biomass in open furnace. Gasifier installed at M/s Phosphate India Pvt. [104].e. More than 350 TERI gasifier systems have mechanism [105]. 10. therefore. Udaipur Fig.

Single stove can save put for dual fuel operation was about 79% of that for diesel fuel about 700 kg of fuel wood per year and at the same time it reduces operation.L. fuels. increase sustainability of the natural resources base. size tial (GWP) than CO2 [110]. 12. a leading first- generation candidate for BIG/GT systems [107].5. Improved cookstoves performed bet- be removed by passing it through the spray tower so that it could ter fuel economy. polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). It helps to improve health stan- Fig. 13). 40 ◦ C. Incomplete and inefficient a gaseous power plant than in the classic power plant during combustion by traditional cookstoves produce significant quanti- the combustion of biomass and steam cycle. . 12. With the experimental system. N. compounds. 11 is a schematic representation of a biomass-integrated 6. and other organic engine application using coconut shell as a fuel as shown in Fig. by Bhattacharya and Salam Abdul [111] and it was concluded Cost of this power plant is estimated to be 2750$/kW and electricity that incomplete combustion of biomass in the traditional cook- costs of 0. Maximum electrical power out. ing stove released carbon monoxide (CO). better indoor air environment and clean kitchen safely run a diesel engine without any tar problems. Improved cookstove is best solution to overcome this Study report that almost all of the tar content in producer gas could type of emission problems. and (3) reduced electrical power output (11:44 kWe) with 81% of the total energy emission of the greenhouse gases that are thought to increase the input coming from producer gas. (2) reduced engine-generator efficiency of 14. The combustion process in traditional cooking stove is non-ideal This process gives high efficiency of electricity production in and favoring incomplete combustion. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 1513–1524 1521 Fig. [109] conduct a study on a multi-stage hybrid methane (CH4 ). the CO2 emission by 161 kg per year. Engine-generator efficiency at dual fuel operation was lower with economic and time saving benefits to the household and than that of diesel fuel operation. Double pot improved cookstove. Panwar et al. and ultra fine particles which have more global warming poten- For this attractive biopower option based on gasification. Emission study was also conducted of biopower plant is 75MW and total efficiency would be  = 36%. nitrous oxide (N2 O). particles biomass–charcoal gasification to produce low tar content gas for composed of elemental carbon or black carbon. Fig. Bhattacharya et al. this process ties of products of incomplete combustion (PIC) comprising of fine enables considerably lower emission of harmful gases and particles.7% was achieved at a maximum human exposure to health damaging air pollutants. Besides. Experimental gasifier–engine system. probability of global climate change [112]. producer gas could be cooled down to less than potentially bring three kinds of benefits: (1) reduced fuel demand. Improved cookstoves gasifier (BIG)/gas turbine (GT) combined cycle. At the optimal (Fig.03$/kWh [108]. Improvements in households biomass burning stoves water flow rate. 13.

0 600–2000 mitigation for clean and sustainable development. which can return to nature.1–1.95]. wind energy. and coal [91]. pressure resistance and hydrogen aging dard of women and child. hydrogen generates no pollutants.1. 2. Hydrogen as fuel Hydrogen has fascinated generations of people for centuries. dryers. Its conversion to heat or power is simple and clean. by electrolysis from water or by chemical processes from hydrocarbons or other hydrogen carriers. It has to be separated from chemical com.5–2. ionizer. pounds. produced gases are pumped intermediately into high pressure stor- eral advantages compared to that of fossil fuels [93]. 7.1522 N. Advantages Use of biomass reduces CO2 emissions Crop residues conversion increases the value of agricultural output Replacing fossil fuels with sustainable biomass fuel Costs of getting rid of municipal solid wastes Limitations Seasonal availability and high costs of handling Nontotal solid conversion (char formation) and tars production Process limitations: corrosion. improved cookstoves and biodiesel was made. The use of solar Fast pyrolysis 975–1225 250–300 1–3 drying of agricultural produce has good potential for energy conser- Gasification 975–1225 300–500 0. The fuel cell is connected to the storage tank via pressure hydrogen from woody biomass is mainly carried out via two reduction valves to generate electricity. only water. Hydrogen is gaining increasing attention as an encouraging future energy [89]. Therefore. 14. The main advan. 14. hydrogen and oxygen (H2 and O2 ). Production of hydrogen from biomass electrolyzer with a limited DC current flow to de compose the water electrochemically into gases. does not exist in nature in its elemental form. storage unit. biogas technology. solar cookers. which Hydrogen from organic wastes has generally been based on the is beneficial to exploit biomass resources. When burnt with oxygen. Table 7 shows 8. Table 8 shows the conditions of thermal treatment of electrolysis may come eventually from clean renewable sources biomass. also reduces the burden of fuel collection [113]. elec- resources are constrained. hydrogen. kinetic energy of wind and water. Biodiesel from nonedible vegetable . Thermochemical conver- sion processes such as pyrolysis and gasification of biomass have Gasificationofbiomass → H2 + CO2 + CO + N2 considerable potential for producing renewable hydrogen.0 vation in developing nations. natural gas. including visionaries like Jules Verne. in a closed loop production thermochemical processes: (a) gasification followed by reform. Conclusion the main advantages and limitations of converting biomass to A comprehensive literature survey of major renewable energy gadgets for domestic and industrial applications such as solar water Table 8 Conditions of thermal treatment of biomass [96]. or The main gaseous products from biomass are [94] the following: geothermal heat. The costs of getting rid of municipal wastes are mounting as land consists of a solar plant (photo-voltaic energy stand-alone). to develop a highly effi- following reactions: cient clean way for large-scale hydrogen production. The Production of hydrogen from renewable biomass has sev. Producing age tanks. hydrogen may become an important Pyrolysisofbiomass → H2 + CO2 + CO + Hydrocarbongases link between renewable physical energy and chemical energy car- riers [90]. The electricity for the hydrogen. and utilization cycle of hydrogen and oxygen [97]. liquefier. pump. Hydrogen is expected to play a key role in the world’s energy future by replacing fossil fuels. Panwar et al. heaters. biomass gasifiers. The PV energy powered the 7. ing of the syngas. The residues conversion increases the value of agricultural out. and (b) fast pyrolysis followed by reforming of the carbohydrate fraction of the bio-oil [94. trolyzer. and to lessen dependence on insecure fossil energy sources [92]. and fuel cell. tion to generate electrical energy is shown in Fig. Fig. Solidwaste → CO + H2 tages of biomass to hydrogen are: Biomass + H2 O + Air → H2 + CO2 1. The system 3. such as solar radiation. However. which are integrated in one system. Process Temperature (K) Heating rate (K/s) Solid residence time (s) The review gives an overview of the development and scope of CO2 Pyrolysis 675–875 0. and thus replacing fossil fuels with sustainable biomass fuel is one option that needs Cellulose + H2 O + Air → H2 + CO + CH4 consideration in reducing CO2 emissions. the most common chemical element on the planet.L. cooler. Structure of production and utilization of hydrogen gas. Most H2 is currently produced from nonrenewable sources Catalyticsteamreformingofbiomass → H2 + CO2 + CO such as oil. The closed loop system of hydrogen production and its utiliza- put. The use of biomass reduces CO2 emissions. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 1513–1524 Table 7 Main Advantage and limitation of biomass to hydrogen [92].

Colombo S. bon. References Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2005. Journal of [45] Kalogirou AS. Climate change [59] Balat M. ment. Energy Explo- and human health: impacts. Zhou W. Magné B.76:9–17. sponsorship under the quality improvement programme of the and Environmental Effects 2007.com/solar-cooking. Energy Sources. Campbell-Lendrum D.30:231–95. Lan NV. The paper results of a comparative field-test. Hanley N. Corvalan C. [54] Thapar V. Kovats RS. nically competitive with or offer technical advantages compared [23] Dincer I. Giovannini B. Energy 2004. Energy 2004. International Journal of Sustainable Energy 2006. Drying Technology 2009. Electricity production using solar energy. Energy Utilization.33:1605–16. Panwar) gratefully acknowledges Maha. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 1513–1524 1523 oil reduces carbon dioxide emissions and petroleum consumption [22] Dincer I. reduces hydrocar.25(3):275–80. Utilization. Biofuels-renewable energy sources: a review. Panwar et al. Delhi for energy technologies in India. Mitigation and Adaptation Strate.28(8):779–92. Hepbasli A. Environmental Issues. Renew- [1] UNDP. Recent advances in biomass conversion technologies. [56] Nagrath IJ. to rural women and improve their health standards. and environment: a developing Hill. Chen CR.31:77–89. Maulana Azad College of Technology. A review of solar thermal tech- fuel.17:73–81. HowStuffWorks. Energy Sources. ability.23(1):69–81. and Environmental Effects 2001.27(5):629–35.23:141–68. Solar Energy 1999. able and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2008. Renewable [43] Xiao C. Part A: Recovery.29:137–54. Energy and environmental correlation Government of India. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2010. New York: UNDP. 1998. Ulgen K. Kawabe T. Acknowledgements [34] Layton J. Kothari DP. Energy Sources. CO2 emissions mitigation potential of some renewable (Rajasthan). [24] Aebischer B. International Journal of Energy Research [12] Hall DO. Environmental issues. mercialisation. rana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology. Bioresource Technology 2009. 5–6. Energy Sources.120:585–96. Madueme TC. heaters network in steam power plants using pinch technology and exergy Energy 2008. Usage of energy sources and environmental problems. Rivington M. country perspective from India. Part A: Recovery. Climate change and drying of agricultural prod- [2] Dincer I. 2001. for renewable energy systems in India. Tang R.2:109–23. India: New India Publishing Agency. N. Cooling the greenhouse with bioenergy. [14] Demirbas A. Tamm G. [5] Demirbas A. Renewable energy activities in Senegal: a [50] Sakamoto Y.L. Hovorka AJ. Academy of Science. Solar thermal collectors and applications. Energy substitutions. March [17] Bergmann A. Goic R. World energy assessment 2000 – energy and the challenge of sustain. International review. to conventional petroleum diesel fuel. analysis. A: Recovery. Journal of Energy Research 2000. The author (N. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2000.25(1):23–31. Saffar-Avval M. Indian Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2010. Solar Energy 2009. Wind farm development – Government [16] Zakhidov RA.44(3):218–23. Harnisch J. [38] Xiaowu W. energy also present good potential in minimization of greenhouse [26] Worrell E. climate change and The application of biomass gasifier at small scale industries is carbon sinks. [6] Kralova I.31(17):1561–72. Nature 1991. Energy Policy 2007. [37] Jyotirmay M. 1995.26(3):159–66. Mujumdar AS. carbon monoxide. Pouris A. Advances in solar thermal electricity technology. Younessi-Sinaki. Oxford. Solar cookers cheap technology with high ecological benefits. Hall DO. explicitly points out the greenhouse gas emission mitigation poten. [4] Fridleifsson IB. Energy Sources. Solar Energy Recovery. [8] Farhad S. Popiel PO. 2006.14:540–4. case of Turkey. Solar drying and CO2 emissions mitigation: potential [3] Bilgen S. Renewable energy: a response to climate change. Kandpal TC. II. Public Health ration and Exploitation 2005. Zhou W. [55] Pryor SC. New Delhi. and Environmental Effects 2007.14:312–22. [18] Reddy AKN. 1999. Zhong H.67:589–97.5:299–312. for selected cash crops in India. Potential and cost of CO2 emissions mitigation by using Educational Science and Technology 2000.29(13):1203–14. Energy analysis of a CO2 recycling system. Reviews 2010.14:153–68. Luo H. New and emerging develop- [9] Sims REH.100:5478–84. Part A: Recovery. therefore. http://science. energy. Kumar NK. Solar energy: a necessary investment in a developing Recovery. Performance analysis of a CO2 recycling Africa? Biomass and Bioenergy 2009. Progress in Energy Dispersion Science and Technology 2010. Part A: Global Change 2009. Solar Energy 2004. biodiesel improves combustion and. 2007. Paris: IEA/OECD.howstuffworks. Rural versus urban preferences for renew. Adaptation for crop agriculture to climate change 2004. [10] Youm I. Utilization.com. Agnihotri G. gases where wind potential is available. Energy for the future: an integrated decision aid for the gies for Global Change 2003. [27] Lafforgue G. Udaipur [36] Kumar A. Energy Sources. Solar Energy 2005. tial depending on the use and availability of renewable energy [32] Wentzel M. and Environmental Effects 2001. [40] Piacentini RD. [29] Thirugnanasambandam M. [41] Kumar A. Utilization. and Environmental Effects 1998. Usmani JA.9:638–45. able energy developments. Ecological Economics 2008. Pain D. Scientific and technical arguments for the optimal use of energy. [33] Nandwani SS. Solar thermal utilization in China. Life cycle assessment of solar PV based [13] Nielsen JBH. Power system engineering. Recovery. Panwar NL. Biomass.29(6):563–9. Bhopal. 2007. How solar cooking works. [21] Haines A. Applied Solar Energy 2008.24(1):19–26.20(4):427–53. Press. society. Energy Sources. Bioenergy to mitigate for climate change and meet the needs of ments in solar energy. Bernstein L. Kane MM. Ecological Economics 2008. system which utilizes solar energy. Utilization.78:321–9. Williams RH. Energy Efficiency 2009. review of solar cooking impact research in South Africa. solar photovoltaic pumps in India. 152–5. .66(6):401–7. Sarr J. [48] Goswami DY.24(6):549–59.26(12):1119–29. Utilization. tives. Part A: Recovery.4(2):157–75. The improved cookstoves provide better kitchen environment nologies.8:349–70. Ben H. Energy Sources. The design of rural energy centers. Life cycle assessment of photovoltaic electricity generation. economy. Review of modern wind turbine technology.353:11–2.L. Exergy analysis of domestic-scale solar water heaters. found suitable and it save considerable amount of conventional [28] IEA.116]. 1989. Solar cooker acceptance in South Africa: time it also reduces fuel collection burden for them. Iniyan S. Global renewable energy resources. Barthelmie RJ. 03 February 2009. Kandpal TC. [11] Horst GH.14:430–7. Efficient design of feedwater [47] Stoppato A. able future. Can solar cooking save the forests? Ecological Economics 1999. [39] Sharma A. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for [58] Balat M.65:616–25. Subramanian DK. Solar-energy drying systems: a review. Utilization.23(1):83–92. Part A: ucts. Fuelwood: the “other” renewable energy source for [51] Sakamoto Y. and Environmental Effects [20] Tingem M. Energy [53] Kumar A. Energy Sources. Renewable energy and sustainable development: a crucial review. and Environmental [42] Demirbas MF.76:19–31. Industrial energy efficiency and climate change mitigation. Solar Energy also tend to increase nitrogen oxide emissions [115. Renewable energy for a clean and sustain. in Cameroon: turning on the heat. vulnerability and public health. Recovery. Sjöblom J.4(1):75–89.35(3):1909–19. Potential solutions.76:33–43. At the same [30] Biermann E. The development impact of solar cookers: a sources and fuel replaced by it. [52] Sherwani AF. and Environmental Effects 2006. Kandpal TC. [49] Topcu YI. Wagner HJ.13(6–7):1185–210. [35] Kalogirou S. Price L. I. Ecological Economics 1996. 2000 (ISBN 9211261260). oxygenated fuels [25] Sims REH. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2001. [7] Dincer I. 2004. Climate change impacts on wind energy: a review.31(3):409–25. Part A: [46] Okoro OI. Utilization. Utilization. Part A: Recovery. New Delhi: Tata McGraw- [19] Ravindranath NH. and particulate emissions.33:224–32. Central Asian countries energy system and role of renewable incentives.26(9):891–901. In: Proceedings of the National Conference on Wind Energy Com- energy sources. Biodiesel is tech. Renewable and Sustainable Energy utilization. India and Indian Institute of Technology. Lu S. economic and environmental life cycle analysis of thermosiphon solar water heaters. Utilization. [31] Tucker M.6:19–40. Thermal performance. Mynick HE. India. Bangalore 1980:109–30. Wind and wave power potential. Energy and environmental impacts: present and future perspec- when used in place of conventional diesel [114]. Wind 2004. Geneva: IEA. The presence of oxygen in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2000. 1998 ed. and Combustion Science 2004. Grupp M. p. and Environmental Effects 2002. Seadi TA. Geothermal energy for the benefit of the people. and Environmental Effects 2009. Sharma A. Utilization.htm [17 March 2010]. Palmer R. 1994. Part Effects 2004. Sall M. the economy and the environment. World Energy Outlook. Varun.29:1549–56. Ulengin F. International Journal of Sustainable Energy [15] Rathore NS. Roy J. Part A: [44] Mills D. Sari A. Vijayaraghavan S. Energy Sources. The future of anaerobic digestion and biogas electricity generation systems: a review. United Kingdom: Oxford University [57] Ozgener O. Kaygusuz K. Renewable energy sources for sustainable develop. International Journal of Energy Research 2008.32:1–11.83:39–48. Moreaux M.

Biomass and Bioenergy 1996. Kurchania AK.36:147–55. Assessment of energy performance in the life-cycle [97] Fahmy FH. Logan BE. Shah NP. Biomass 2009. Kothari DP. evaluation of an agricultural residue based modular throat type down draft [76] Ramadhas AS. Boiling Point 2007. Application of [91] Zhang H. and Environmental cose used as a model compound of biomass gasified in supercritical water. Hydrogen production from biomass by the gasification pro- [68] Gujer W. Vargas RM. Mitigation and [77] Naik M. Conversion processes in anaerobic digestion. Mukunda HS. adoption of improved. Water Research [64] Borjesson P. [67] Kurchania AK. Korea. Salam Abdul P. Quality management of AD residues from biogas production. Biomass to hydrogen via Bioenergy. and Environmental Effects Science and Technology 1983. doi:10. Jindal S. Performance 2005. tion of a diesel engine fueled with methyl esters of rubber seed oil. Kishore VVN. Energy Sources.15:127–67. Masjuki HH.29:2195–211. Paul PJ. 2006. SPRERI experience on holistic nology. Effects 2004. Energy etable oils: a review. Environmental systems analysis of biogas systems. core downdraft biomass gasifier for food processing industry. Journal of [90] Bossel U.14:569–78. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change [84] Bala BK. Ricardo Sercheli R. Energy Sources.26(9):811–819. engine system.40:728–34. Current Science 2003. Nadre RG. Busan. Water cess. Savita PD. Annual Review of 2009. Joshi V. Sridhar HV. Babu BV. Sustainable Energy 2010. The future of the hydrogen economy: bright or Energy Conversion and Management 1996. Rathore NS.33:155–8. [102] Chawla S. Biomass gasifier systems for thermal applications in rural 21/11/2009]. Bamniya BR. Studies on biodiesels from transformation of vegetable oils for diesel 2009. Biomass and Bioenergy 2006. Candeia RA. Kurchania AK. Biomass gasifier gas turbine power generating Tech- [79] Singh RN.32:72–7. energy. Experimental studies on producer gas generation Journal MC 2008. Panwar et al. Govt.9:199– 2004.22:305–17. Sharma AM. Institution of Engineers (India) [99] Sheth PN. Macor A. Das LM.2:393–414.L. Performance evaluation of duel fuel engine and Biorefining 2008. Energy for Sustainable Development 1994. Task 24–Energy from Biological Conversion of Organic Waste. Jain N. Part A: Recovery. Campbell PK. The future of anaerobic resources. Greenhouse duck tallow with methanol on alkali catalysts. Sridhar HV. 2009.18(3):29–70. Vedaraman N. Renewable [105] Panwar NL. Sjöblom J. Rheological behavior of castor oil biodiesel. [114] Carraretto C. Design and performance evaluation [95] Caglar A. Biomass and 23–30. istration. Utilization. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment [100] Dasappa S. Chornet E. Indian scenario of wind energy: problems and [89] Hao XH.53:17–9. Rajan NKS.100:3127–33. Mukunda HS.net. Global warming mitigation 2009. Shrirame HY. [82] Panwar NL. Bharat Ram BV. [93] Nath K. Fuel-cycle emissions.IEA-Biogas. Pham HL. [63] Weiland P. Biomass gasifica- [75] Puhan S. engines. 2010. Carvalho MG. Technological options for producing hydrogen from renewable [65] Holm-Nielsen JB.22:179–93. Power converters and control of [88] Panwar NL. Tonon S. International Journal of Sustainable Energy [80] Kalbande SR. Part I. Biomass and Bioenergy and emission study of mahua oil (madhuca indica oil) ethyl ester in a 4. In: Proceedings of 6th International Conference of castor seed oil in Indian context. Biodiesel as [85] Schuchardt U.21:445–60. Stoppato A. Hydrogen production from glu- solutions. Czernik S. Sridhar G.29(2):116–23. [98] Babu BV. Taylor G. [87] Beer T. Liserre M. Shrirame HY. Renewable Energy [104] Pathak BS. Performance tion – a substitute to fossil fuel for heat application. Wind energy for the 1990s and beyond. Biomass and Bioenergy implications of household stoves: an analysis for India. Washington. Performance and emission evalua. Bhave AG. fatty acid Karanja (Pongamia pinnata) oil. www. Bhatia A. Utilization. [66] Al Seadi T. Fernandes Jr VJ. Biomass and Bioenergy 2002. Khalil MAK. Ozmen H. fast pyrolysis and catalytic steam reforming of the pyrolysis oil or its fractions. Energy and the Environment 2000.100:5478– Effects 2006. Urquhart J.85:849–60. Borjesson P. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 1513–1524 [60] Blaabjerg F. [81] Chung KH.36:1507–18. An appraisal of critical materials problems in biomass Souza AG. Bruns MA.2009]. Biomass pyrolysis: a state-of-the-art review. International Journal of tional Science and Technology 2000. Chen XJ. Rathore NS. Testing palm biodiesel and NPAA additives to con. [111] Bhattacharya SC. Narra M.28(13):1215–23.30:1269–78. bleak? Cogeneration and Distributed Generation Journal 2003. [62] Thomas BG. trol NOx and CO while improving efficiency in diesel engine. Hydrogen from biomass. Bioenergy Research [109] Bhattacharya SC. Health. Transesterification of veg. Biomass and Bioenergy 2001. Berglund M.30:245–9. Panwar NL. Part A: Recovery. gasification technology – a route to meet energy needs. October 18–22. Eliasson B. Al Seadi T. Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society 1998. Experimental investigation of open Energy 2005. Global Warming 2009. Bhoi PR. Energy Educational Science and Technology 2005.87(7):908–16. areas. 2004. the sustainability option. [70] Tademirolu E.csiro. Naik SN. Biomass and Bioenergy 2006. More GR. Larson ED. gasifier for thermal application. Paul PJ. uary 2002. culture and agro based industries. [61] Singh S. Progress in of Dispersion Science and Technology 2010. Teodorescu R.19:2185–8. Chen Z. Hydrogen gas production and utilization as elec- of biogas production.37:1741–52.14:547–56. The global climate challenge: recent trends in CO2 emis- sions of biodiesel blends in Australia.26(4):179–93. http://www. [115] Demirbas A. and greenhouse-gas impact of biomass combustion [83] Panwar NL.33:1868–73. . Energy and Fuels gasifier system. Bioresource Technology [72] Pathak H.157:407–18.15:1–45.11. 2004.au/resources/ sions from fuel combustion. Biodiesel production from non-edible oils of 2007.30:1789–800. approach to utilize all parts of Jatropha curcas fruit for energy. Utilization.1(1–3):365–77. Dantas HJ. Meher LC. The emission characteristics of a compression igni. [103] Dasappa S. [112] Smith KR. [107] Williams RH.24:59–68. Bioresource Technology 1991. Das D. 2005 [from internet: [101] Palit D. Sankaranarayanan G. [accessed on 20. Sharma D. Zehnder AJB. Utilization. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2003. Renewable [108] Afgan NH. alternative fuel: experimental analysis and energetic evaluations. Mirandola A.88:37–41. Mohanty S.6:1–18. 210. Grant T. of India. Guo LJ.31(3):409–25. Energy and Combustion Science 2005. Mao X. Biological hydrogen production by Clostrid- Microbiology and Biotechnology 2010. Montane D. and Environmental Effects 1999. Rathore NS. [69] Berglund M. Gupta N. 2005. Energy Sources.10(2–3):149–66. Vyas DK. Kim J. [96] Demirbas A.1007/s10098-009-0269-5 [published online first]. Oleskowicz-Popiel P. CO2 mitigation potential from biodiesel renewable energy systems. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 1997. Biennial report of thermo chemical conversation technology of 354–7. Current Science [73] International Energy Outlook. p. Clean Technology Environmental Policy on Power Electronics (ICPE’04). Bioenergy 2008. Biomass and Bioenergy 2008.28:55–64. submitted to ICAR. Internal Energy Outlook information admin. potential of biogas plants in India. 1993. 2003. tricity using a renewable energy source. 2002. stroke natural aspirated directed injection diesel engine. Economics of biogas space heating systems in rural Turkey. Bioresource Technology 2009. Jatropha and Karanj for utilization in electrical generator. Hydrogen: as an attractive fuel in future.21(7):629–41. Mann M.25:741–63. New Delhi: Tata Energy Research Institute. 2007.1:170–8. [74] Conceicao MM. Sridhar G.1524 N.html. Kishore VVN. [92] Demirbas MF. Jan. Muraleedharan C. Kurchania AK. Energy Educa- of biogas stove for community cooking application. Biofuels Bioproducts [71] Meena M.32: [106] Panwar NL. Part A: Recovery. 84. Mande S.I(4):23–9. Patel SR. IEA [94] Wang D.31:466–87. Energy Sources. Biogas production: current state and perspectives. Biodiesel production by transesterification of [110] Smith KR.30:254–66. Panwar NL. Biomass-fired power plant: Energy 2008. [116] Demirbas B. Mitigation of greenhouse gases by Applied Thermal Engineering 2010. Performance in household stoves. Biofuels – renewable energy sources: a review. Uma R. Hla SS.85:265–71. all India coordinated research project on renewable energy sources for agri- [78] Kalam MA. Lee KY. Part A: Recovery. 2009. Production of biodiesel from high free Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 2009. Journal catalytic supercritical methanol transesterification methods. DC: Department of Energy. A study on a multi-stage hybrid gasifier- 2008. Low greenhouse gas biomass option for tion engine operating on castor oil methyl ester. and Environmental digestion and biogas utilization. Biomass and Energy 2008. Bhatti TS. Zhang J. Biodiesel production from vegetable oils via catalytic and non- [86] Kralova I. Soledade LEB. International Journal of cooking in the developing countries. ium acetobutylicum in an unsaturated flow reactor. [113] Panwar NL. Srivastava NSL.30:469–85. Zhang XM. Jayaraj S. The greenhouse and air quality emis. Energy Educational Science and Technology pf13o. Jovanovic M. with scrubbed biogas for power generation.32:1116–22. evaluation of a diesel engine fueled with methyl ester of castor seed oil.25(6):637–49. from wood waste in a downdraft biomass gasifier. Shrirame HY. Abdel-Rehim ZS.