You are on page 1of 12

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 1513–1524

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/rser

Role of renewable energy sources in environmental protection: A review
N.L. Panwar a,∗ , S.C. Kaushik b , Surendra Kothari a
a
Department of Renewable Energy Sources, College of Technology and Engineering, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur 313 001, India
b
Center for Energy Studies, Indian Institute of Technology – Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi 110 016, India

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t

Article history: Renewable technologies are considered as clean sources of energy and optimal use of these resources
Received 12 August 2010 minimize environmental impacts, produce minimum secondary wastes and are sustainable based on
Accepted 12 November 2010 current and future economic and social societal needs. Sun is the source of all energies. The primary forms
Available online 12 January 2011
of solar energy are heat and light. Sunlight and heat are transformed and absorbed by the environment
in a multitude of ways. Some of these transformations result in renewable energy flows such as biomass
Keywords:
and wind energy. Renewable energy technologies provide an excellent opportunity for mitigation of
Greenhouse gases
greenhouse gas emission and reducing global warming through substituting conventional energy sources.
CO2 mitigation
Sustainable development
In this article a review has been done on scope of CO2 mitigation through solar cooker, water heater, dryer,
Renewable energy sources biofuel, improved cookstoves and by hydrogen.
© 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Contents

1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1513
2. Renewable energy sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1514
3. Climate change scenario . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1514
4. Solar energy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1515
4.1. Solar thermal application . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1515
4.2. Solar thermal power . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1516
4.3. Solar photovoltaic system . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1516
5. Wind energy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1517
6. Bioenergy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1517
6.1. Biogas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1517
6.2. Biodiesel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1519
6.3. Biomass gasifier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1520
6.4. Gasifier based power generation system . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1520
6.5. Improved cookstoves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1521
7. Hydrogen as fuel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1522
7.1. Production of hydrogen from biomass . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1522
8. Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1522
Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1523
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1523

1. Introduction [2,3]. Large-scale hydropower supplies 20 percent of global elec-
tricity. Wind power in coastal and other windy regions is promising
Renewable energy sources (RES) supply 14% of the total world source of energy [1,4]. Main renewable energy sources and their
energy demand [1]. RES includes biomass, hydropower, geother- usage forms are given in Table 1. RESs are also called alternative
mal, solar, wind and marine energies. The renewable are the energy sources. The share of RESs is expected to increase very signif-
primary, domestic and clean or inexhaustible energy resources icantly (30–80% in 2100) [4]. The global renewable energy scenario
by 2040 is presented in Table 2.
Sustainable development requires methods and tools to mea-
∗ Corresponding author. Tel.: +91 294 2471068; fax: +91 294 2471056. sure and compare the environmental impacts of human activities
E-mail address: nlpanwar@rediffmail.com (N.L. Panwar). for various products [7]. At present, consumption of fossil fuels

1364-0321/$ – see front matter © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.rser.2010.11.037

Arctic sea ice thinned by 40% and that meet domestic energy requirements have the potential to pro.7 44 266 542 688 Solar thermal 4. solar dryers. waste minimization. omy.310 Biomass 1080 1313 1791 2483 3271 Large hydro 22. solar cookers Direct solar Photovoltaic. Excessive use of fossil the greenhouse effect). decreased in extent by 10–15% in summer since the 1950s [25]. increased floods and cally acceptable globally. lem relating to energy is global climate change (global warming or ing world’s growing energy needs [10.g. halons. ance of effects on health is likely to be negative and populations distributed energy generation. ozone. N2 O. Harvesting the renewable energy in decentral- ized manner is one of the options to meet the rural and small scale energy needs in a reliable. 20 Gt of Carbon added to Renewable energy resources will play an important role in the environment since 1800 only due to deforestation and the con- world’s future. CFCs.05 0.1514 N. power generation. The global mean sur- [14]. and in low income countries are likely to be particularly vulnerable reduction of greenhouse gas emissions [9]. Climate change scenario sive fossil fuel consumption not only leads to an increase in the rate of diminishing fossil fuel reserves. hot lation. Renewable energy system devel- Energy source Energy conversion and usage options opment will make it possible to resolve the presently most crucial Hydropower Power generation tasks like improving energy supply reliability and organic fuel econ- Modern biomass Heat and power generation.19]. gasification.1 0. wind generators. A schematic representation of this global climate change problem tives of the Kyoto Protocol agreement [13].6 23.4 3 16 68 Marine (tidal/wave/ocean) 0. Renewable energy sources of 1–2 mm over the last century. for example as a result of increased frequency and intensity of towards environmental improvements are becoming more politi. sustainable way [18. Increasing global temperature ulti- energy. especially in developed countries.11]. implementations of renewable energy project in rural areas can water pumps create job opportunities and thus minimizing migration towards Wave Numerous designs Tidal Barrage.549 11. tidal stream urban areas [17].964. 2. It has long been recognized that this exces. hydrothermal.1 2 24 221 784 Solar thermal electricity 0. water of the countries with regard to fulfilling the international agree- heaters ments relating to environmental protection [16].5 1. The overall bal- methods. and peroxy- renewable promotion of clean energy is eagerly required [12].352 13. to the adverse effects. 1. Renewable energy sources are those resources which can be face temperature has increased by 0. therefore.6 16. The energy resources have been split into three centration of methane gas which is responsible for ozone layer categories: fossil fuels.4 3 20 Total RES 1. resulting in increased the 21st century [20]. The increasing concentration of greenhouse fuels has caused global warming by carbon dioxide. changes in the distribution of vector-borne diseases and is slowly moving towards seeking more sustainable production effects on the risk of disasters and malnutrition.4–0.4 4289 6351 Renewable energy source contribution (%) 13.745. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 1513–1524 Table 1 vide energy services with zero or almost zero emissions of both air Main renewable energy sources and their usage form [5]. reduction in cold related deaths. industrialization of developing nations.7 . In this paper. implementation of the obligations Solar Solar home system. has been made to find out the scope of renewable energy gadgets Table 3 reveals Humankind is contributing with a great many to meet out energy needs and mitigation potential of greenhouse economic activities to the increase atmospheric concentration of gases mainly carbon dioxide. e. attempt is illustrated in Fig. 3.6 34. 2001 2010 2020 2030 2040 Total consumption (million tons oil equivalent) 10. pyrolysis.038 10. affordable and environmentally is dramatically increasing along with improvements in the qual.7 266 309 341 358 Geothermal 43. ity of life. reduced air pollution from vehicles.1 15 66 244 480 Photovoltaic 0.8 ◦ C in the last century used to produce energy again and again. Climate change is one of the primary concerns for humanity in cant adverse impact on the environment. Renewable energy sources Many scientific studies reveal that overall CO2 levels have increased 31% in the past 200 years. but it also has a signifi. wind above the baseline of 14 ◦ C. and are also often mately increases global mean sea levels at an average annual rate called alternative sources of energy [15]. ensuring sustainable development of the remote regions in dry rock the desert and mountain zones.365. was made with the overall pollution prevention targets. To acetylnitrate in the atmosphere is acting to trap heat radiated from monitor emission of these greenhouse emissions an agreement Earth’s surface and is raising the surface temperature of Earth [22]. It may affect health through a range of path- health risks and the threat of global climate change [8]. various greenhouse gases. CH4 . and increase of the world population. Society droughts. the objec. Current situation and the role of various greenhouse gases are given in Table 3. Panwar et al. Changes ways. solar energy. thermal power generation. Table 2 Global renewable energy scenario by 2040 [6]. renewable resources and nuclear resources depletion has more than doubled since then.2 86 186 333 493 Small hydro 9.5 2. geothermal energy.L. etc. The potentially most important environmental prob- interest in promoting renewable alternatives to meet the develop. pollutants and greenhouse gases.5 19 49 106 189 Wind 4. The experience of the 2003 heat wave in Increasing consumption of fossil fuel to meet out current energy Europe showed that high-income countries may also be adversely demands alarm over the energy crisis has generated a resurgence of affected [21]. conservation of native forests. biomass energy. Development and Wind Power generation.425 12. windmills. solving problems of local energy and water supply. increasing digestion the standard of living and level of employment of the local popu- Geothermal Urban heating. gases such as CO2 .7 47.1 0. heat waves.

Various types World 14. the developing countries could possible in order to achieve a sustainable future [35]. Panwar et al. The Sun emits energy at a rate saves energy.37]. N. Transition economic 3029 3135 3852 4465 Solar cooking is the most direct and convenient application of China 875 3051 5322 7081 solar energy.732 22.75 1. etc.7% per year.163 of the leading energy sources for cooking [30–32]. Solar energy is a promising option capable of being one Rest of the world 1436 4791 8034 11.2 18 9 ± 2 R-11 17.8 × 1014 kW is inter- CO2 emission by region (million tons of CO2 [28]. is around 12–14 There is ample scope to minimize emission of greenhouse gases if months. . Solar energy at 50% capacity utilization and in hot and sunny region it is about 1410. of advantages and limitations of solar ovens with conventional fire- which over 80% is from energy use. time. hygienic and sanitary conditions mal energy is the most abundant one and is available in both to national and international standards with zero energy costs. It is esti- account for half of global CO2 emissions. By 2020. prevented [33].763 13. OECD 9031 10. the vegetables and fruits in clean.9 Gt CO2 in 2004. Substance Ability to retain Pre industrial Present concentration Annual growth rate (%) Share in the Share in the greenhouse infrared radiations concentration greenhouse effect due increase due to human compared to CO2 to human activity (%) activity (%) CO2 1 275 346 0. 3 Solar-drying technology offers an alternative which can process As far as renewable energy sources is concerned solar ther. roughly 16. at 2.000 0 0.65 1. of which. out of them box type solar cooker (Fig. CO2 Solar water heater of domestic size. improves product quality. The payback period of a common hot box which were 9. have grown by 65% since 1971 [26].0 1 13 ± 3 R-12 20.848 of solar cookers are available.427 14.8 million tons of firewood can be saved and the efficient utilization of renewable energy sources in actual energy emission of 38.189 37. wood and electric stoves. A study was conducted Industry contributes directly and indirectly (through electricity in Costa Rica and in the world as a whole. water heating. 1. cepted by the earth [29].2% per year.0 8 15 ± 5 N2 O 250 0. type solar oven. Total energy-related emissions.500 0 0. Solar thermal application in Fig.L.4 million tons of carbon dioxide per year can also be meeting route is promoted [27]. approximately 1. 2) is widely used all over the world.8 × 1023 kW.5 kg [36.4 71 50 ± 5 CH4 25 0.00040 5.1. A schematic of solar water heater is illustrated 4. A schematic illustration of greenhouse effect [23].00023 5. The outlook the hot water needs of a family of four persons. occupies less area. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 1513–1524 1515 Fig.150 31. and then compared the consumption) about 37% of the global greenhouse gas emissions. Table 4 reveals that over the period from 1971 to 1995. It direct as well as indirect forms.0 2 13 ± 3 Table 4 of 3.35 0.25 0. suitable to satisfy most of emissions grew at an average rate of 1. offers significant projects a faster growth rate of CO2 emissions for the period to protection to the environment and should be employed whenever 2020. even if used 6–8 months a year. There is vast scope to utilize available solar 1971 1995 2010 2020 energy for thermal applications such as cooking. mated that a domestic solar water heating system of 100 l per day capacity can mitigate around 1237 kg of CO2 emissions in a year 4.476 crop drying. Table 3 Role of different substances in the greenhouse effect [24].

Solar thermal and solar PV systems 0 9–40 Pulverized coal–natural gas turbine 100–230 5–7 evacuated tube. Fig.5 kWh m−2 is about 2085 kg from diesel operated pumps and device which utilize the solar radiation for the generation of elec- about 1860 kg from petrol operated pumps. energy related problems are becoming more and more important and involve the ideal use of resources.44]. Solar thermal power [50. generation [42]. for space and terrestrial applications. tricity is not available. Sunlight is free but power generation cost is exceptionally makes the process more efficient and protects the environment high. but solar irradiation is plentiful.L. Schematic diagram of a solar thermal conversion system. compound parabolic. ture area can save 463 kg of carbon dioxide in life cycle embodied Silicon solar cells are perhaps the simplest and most widely used [41]. and . thus the Net annual CO2 emission mitigation potential from 1. [48]. Solar photovoltaic system Electrical energy is the pivot of all developmental efforts in both the developed and the developing nations because conven- tional energy sources are finite and fast depleting [46]. although prices are starting to come down.77 tons of CO2 year−1 . The primary component a drying system using 100 kWh day−1 of electricity. Solar energy has [39]. Direct solar energy conversion to electricity is conventionally done using photovoltaic cells. Solar energy collectors are special kind of heat exchang. low energy density: PV modules require a large surface area for Piacentini and Mujumdar [40] estimated CO2 production for small amounts of energy generation [49]. It came to around produced by PV array into AC power consistent with the voltage 14. 4. Box type solar cooker [34]. A historical introduction into the use of Electricity generation technology Carbon emissions Generation costs (gC/kWh) (US¢/kWh) solar energy was attempted followed by a description of the var- ious types of collectors including flat-plate. PV effect depends on interaction of photons. Electricity production cost through solar energy is quite higher than that of conventional power station. Further the development in efficiency of solar cells. ers that transform solar radiation energy to internal energy of the transport medium. which makes use of the photovoltaic (PV) effect. parabolic dish. 4. 5. A typical domestic-scale solar water heater [38].3. Fresnel lens. Fig. As far as carbon emission is concerned solar based power station released almost zero carbon as presented in Table 5. Panwar et al. Further study was conducted on solar crop and power quality requirement of the utility gird as illustrated in drying and CO2 emission potential. over 25 days in grid connected PV systems is the inverter. it convert DC power per month in 11 months of operation per year. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 1513–1524 Fig. There are many remote areas in the world where elec- and greenhouse gas emissions [52]. It was estimated that 1m2 aper. the environmen- tal impact due to the emission of pollutants and the consumption of conventional energy resources [47]. The CO2 emissions tricity through the solar thermal conversion.8 kWp utilization of solar energy to produce electricity in these areas is solar photovoltaic pump at an average solar radiation of quite possible [42]. Solar thermal electricity power system is a 5.1516 N. parabolic trough. noise. 3. Some of the losses due to the band-gap limitations are avoided by cascading semiconductors of different band-gaps. The major component of any solar thermal system is the solar Table 5 Economics and emissions of conventional technologies compared with solar power collector. 4 [43. 2. or more than the band-gap of PV materials. electricity directly from light without emissions. In the last decades.2. with energy equal to. amount of material used in the solar cell and the system design for maxi- Solar energy is a very important energy source because of its mum use of recycled material will reduce the energy requirement advantages. PV modules generate Fig. even if current technologies are applied 4. heliostat field collectors [45]. or vibra- tion.51]. The PV system is promis- ing source of electricity generation for energy resource saving and CO2 emission reduction. basically collected mitigation potential is higher in the case of diesel substitution as solar energy is converted to electricity through the use of some sort of heat to electricity conversion device as shown in Fig.

CO2 30–60%. Some changes associ- ated with climate evolution will most likely benefit the wind energy 6.L. inaccessible and hilly areas [61]. It small power needs in isolated sites. installed capacity and is experiencing rapid growth. This variety and the var- potential for wind energy is estimated to be 26. it has been evaluated as one of the most energy-efficient and envi- should be used in conjunction with other methods of power gener. and agricultural waste products. com. available in wind to electricity or mechanical power through the The large amounts of animal manure and slurries produced use of wind turbines [59]. 7. This is primarily due to low in price. ronmentally beneficial technology for bioenergy production [63]. while ious fields of application for the biogas and digested product result a capacity of 9000 TWh/yr may be utilized due to economical and in great differences in the environmental performance among the other reasons [57]. wind power is the recycling measures [65] and it is as shown in Fig. 40–70%. N. At a mean wind speed of 4. Wind turbine nutrients and organic matter to the natural environment it is nec- blades use airfoils to develop mechanical power [60]. the power from the wind by means of aerodynamically designed To prevent emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG) and leaching of blades and convert it into rotating mechanical power. Wind turbines capture tial negative impact on the environment. essary to close the loops from production to utilization by optimal In the power-starved developing countries. Bioenergy is also susceptible to global climate change.5 m/s. Among the raw materials are organic Wind energy for electricity production today is a mature. the most promising countries for wind power development in the world [54]. Panwar et al. 5. However. Wind energy annual CO2 emission mitigation potential is the lowest (2874 kg) for GM-II model and highest (7401 kg) for SICO model in the case of Of the renewable energy technologies applied to electricity gen- diesel substitution. today by the animal breeding sector as well as the wet organic vert the motion of the wind into rotational energy that can be used waste streams represent a constant pollution risk with a poten- to drive a generator. The function of a wind turbine is to con. eral billion barrels of oil and avoid many million tons of carbon and other emissions [62]. Methane fermentation is a com- . potential biogas systems.1. The calorific value of tricity generation from wind never depletes and never increases biogas is about 16–20 MJ m−3 [67]. Wind power may prove practical for nificant advantages over other forms of bioenergy production. dedicated energy petitive. viable source of electricity. Wind energy potential studies show For the production of biogas it is possible to use several different that the world-wide wind resources are abundant. with such ‘gains and losses’ depending on the region The production of biogas through anaerobic digestion offers sig- under consideration [55]. waste from households and the food industry. The electricity produced by these systems could save sev- efficiency of fuel utilization in the diesel engine pump [53]. 6. for the above-mentioned two models [36]. for the case of electricity substitution eration. compared to the petrol substitution. the estimated value of net 5.000 TWh/yr. Wind technology converts the energy manure [64]. it is estimated at 2194 kg and 5713 kg. and virtually pollution-free technology widely used in crops. The world-wide raw materials and digestion technologies. even in remote. Biogas industry while other changes may negatively impact wind energy developments. Elec. ation to ensure continuity [56]. but for maximum flexibility. wind energy ranks second only to hydroelectric in terms of for the same wind speeds. and other gases 1–5%. which can be installed and transmitted Biogas is a mixture of gases that is composed mainly of CH4 very rapidly. India is one of respectively. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 1513–1524 1517 Fig. Similarly. such as crop residues and many areas of the world [58]. wind energy 6. if not managed optimally. Expansion of wind energy installed capacity is poised to play a key role in climate change mitigation. as illustrated in Fig. Grid connected photovoltaic system.

It can be produced when needed and can easily be stored. 8. acetogenesis/dehydrogenation and methanation as shown in Fig. Handling of energy crops includes the entire energy input and emissions from the cultivation and harvesting of the crop. Biogas has definite advantages. acidogenesis. 7. even if compared to other renewable energy alternatives. . 9. and hence. 6.1518 N. transportation fuel or distributed on the natural gas grid Fig. The stages of the methane fermentation process [68]. the digestion of the raw materials in farm-scale and large-scale biogas plants. for end application [69]. It include emissions from the energy input in the entire biogas production chain. The other raw materials are assumed to be waste products. Panwar et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 1513–1524 Fig. Schematic representation of the sustainable cycle of anaerobic co-digestion of animal manure and organic wastes [66]. 8. Conversion from wind power to electrical power in a wind turbine. The biogas can directly be used for domestic cooking. the handling of raw materials. the analysis includes only the additional energy input and emissions associated with the handling and trans- port of these waste products.L. and none of the input used in the production of the main product. that is. Fig. which can be divided up into four phases: hydrolysis. These crops are assumed to be cultivated on set-aside arable land. Borjesson and Berglund [64] present an overview of biogas sys- tems as shown in Fig. Consequently. since it is assumed to be cultivated primarily for biogas production. It can be distributed through the existing natural gas infrastructure and used in the same applications like the natural gas [13]. plex process. and the final use of the digestates and bio- gas. the analysis does not treat the production of food or fodder replacements.

duck tallow [81] and castor seed oil [82] and its blends through substituting firewood for cooking.16 49 439 Cottonseed (China) 33. providing poten- vegetable oil in internal combustion engines is not a recent innova. in mixture. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 1513–1524 1519 Fig.L.80]. car. while 6. Nevertheless.75 42 433 Tallow (US) 32. palm oil [78]. In 1912.10 58 436 Tall oil (Scandinavia) 51. able.3 75 525 4. it is known that oil is a finite resource and that its price tends run engine. and emissions from the system. creator of the diesel cycle engines. tion of a base and acid.7 65 576 3. These reactions are often catalyzed by the addi- [72]. rubber seed Biogas technology provides an excellent opportunity for miti. 9. traditional space heating systems (stoves) in rural Turkey. The global warming mitiga. which is the largest producer of greenhouse gases. Biodiesel has the potential to reduce emissions from the trans- increasing threat to the environment from exhaust emissions and port industry. thus making it more reactive [85]. energy flows.30 50 461 . The use of into the atmosphere as a result of burning fuels. some 85–90% of of the primary chemical products of transesterification are given in world primary energy consumption will continue (until 2030) to Table 6. At the same time rising petroleum prices. Jatropha curcas gation of greenhouse gas emission and reducing global warming [79. be based on fossil fuels. Properties Oil or fat (refined) Methyl ester Viscosity (mm2 /s at 311 K) Cetane number Flash point (K) Viscosity (mm2 /s at 311 K) Cetane number Flash point (K) Soyabean (US) 33. Bases can catalyze the reaction by removing a proton from the alcohol. Transesterification is the bon credit of US $97 year−1 could be earned from such reduction in process of exchanging the alkoxy group of an ester compound by greenhouse gas emission under the clean development mechanism another alcohol.08 46 441 Palm (Malaysia) 42. and dried animal waste [70]. N. Biogas used peanut vegetable oil to demonstrate his invention in Paris in systems for heating was found economical viable when compared 1900.2.5 531 4.. industry is called transesterification [84]. the passing years.7 tons CO2 equiv. Panwar et al. “The use of vegetable oils as engine fuel with traditional heating systems fuelled by wood. The arrows represent material flows. Biodiesel acids can catalyze the reaction by donating a proton to the carbonyl group. coal and wood may seem negligible today.7 535 4.7 37. common methods used to reduce oil viscosity in the biodiesel year−1 and with the current price of US $10 tons−1 CO2 equiv. Biodiesel is being extracted from Mahua oil [75].4 36. Pongamia pinnata oil [77]. as its reserves are fast depleting [74]. Overview of the biogas systems analysed.1 38. kerosene for lighting showed performance characteristics close to diesel [83]. and cooking and chemical fertilizers. Power generation from bio. tial benefits to human health [87]. Straight vegetable oil has higher viscosity and one of the most tion potential of a family size biogas plant was 9. thus making it more reactive.” Nowa- gas is quite possible in both duel fuel mode and 100 percent biogas days.1 524 3. The overall engine performance was improved when to increase exponentially. Diesel said. Biogas systems are considered to be strong alternatives to the tion. as important as oil and coal tar presently.60 47 453 Sunflower (EU) 34. oil [76].3 37.94 62 431 Rapeseed (EU) 37. global warming have generated intense international interest in The use of biodiesel also reduces the particulate matter released developing alternative non-petroleum fuels for engines. Rudolf Diesel (1858–1913). A study was reported in Indian Table 6 Comparison of physical properties of vegetable oil and their methylester preparation via transesterification [86]. scrubbed biogas was used in duel fuel engine as compared to raw Biodiesel is a clean burning fuel that is renewable and biodegrad- gas duel fuel engine [71]. such oils may become.1 548 4.0 ? 485 5. The physical properties With reference to world energy scenario [73].

A biomass-gasifier/gas turbine combined cycle. .782 tons of CO2 emission can be saved on annual basis. 10. 6. Required process heat Package of practice was developed by IISc. The developed system is operating for about 6 h every day and consumes approx- gasifier is in position to replace 2000 l of diesel or LDO per day imately 48 kg/h of sized fuel per hours against 50 kg/h wood for completely. tion. The CO2 released during combustion of biodiesel can be recycled through next crop production. This industry is working for concentration technologies available in India are based on downdraft gasification of about 500 l/day of phosphoric acid. ence.5 tons of LPG. Gas turbines cannot be fired directly with biomass. There is huge scope to utilize the gasification technology in small scale industries for low tempera. The system operates over 140 h per week on a nearly 11 h per day. The gasifier Limited. Panwar et al. implying a saving of about combustion. biomass gets converted in high grade fuel known as charcoal and further into low calorific gas called producer gas [98. Study was conducted on open core downdraft option for the increase of energy production with the increase of gasifier in small scale industries to produce process heat in the efficiency. because the ing the study it was found that 6. Sardar Patel Renewable Energy Research Institute (SPRERI). it is feasible to operate gas turbines with biomass Fig. The developed system is in position to save about nonstop mode and over 4000 h of operation replacing fossil fuel 24. In the gasifier low grade fuel.15 tons of CO2 in 1800 working hours [106]. Gasifier installed at M/s Phosphate India Pvt. Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE) has taken initiative to develop research group within India for technology and man power development. 10.99]. no additional burden on environment [88]. Bangalore (IISc) [100]. Over 3000 h of operation gasifier has resulted However. The initial gravity of acid is and designed primarily for woody biomass [102]. been successfully installed in the field throughout India with a Similar design of gasifier was tested at M/s Phosphate India Pvt. completely [103]. Dur. Udaipur Fig. by first gasifying the biomass and cleaning the gas before in a saving of about 19. The Energy and Resource Institute (TERI).e. as a consequence Indian premier institute like Indian Institute of Sci- Fig. therefore.4. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 1513–1524 context that if 10% of total production of castor seed oil is transes- terfied into biodiesel. The marigold flower with open top downdraft gasifier. Udaipur. then about 79.39 MW thermal capacities was car. 6. of woody biomass. 11. Biomass use for power generation has become an attractive ture applications. More than 350 TERI gasifier systems have mechanism [105]. i. which is required to be brought 50%. Ltd.L. To disseminate the gasifica- tion technology in actual uses. Gasifier based power generation system ried out by Pathak et al.3. cumulative installed capacity of over 13 MWth [101].. decrease of environment degradation and waste utiliza- temperature range of 200–350 ◦ C for backing bakery items. Bangalore to dry is meeting through combustion of biomass in open furnace.5 kg of LPG was replaced by 38 kg biomass combustion products would damage the turbine blades. Biomass gasifier Gasifier is a device which converts solid fuel into gaseous fuel through thermo chemical conversion route. etc. have been involved in the field of biomass combustion and 33 tons of CO2 . thus a promising candidate for clean development gasification technology. 20%. The gas thus produced by gasifier can be utilized to produce process heat for thermal application.1520 N. Work on development of modular throat type down draft gasifier having 1. [104].

a leading first- generation candidate for BIG/GT systems [107]. Improved cookstoves gasifier (BIG)/gas turbine (GT) combined cycle. producer gas could be cooled down to less than potentially bring three kinds of benefits: (1) reduced fuel demand. particles biomass–charcoal gasification to produce low tar content gas for composed of elemental carbon or black carbon. this process ties of products of incomplete combustion (PIC) comprising of fine enables considerably lower emission of harmful gases and particles. compounds. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 1513–1524 1521 Fig. and (3) reduced electrical power output (11:44 kWe) with 81% of the total energy emission of the greenhouse gases that are thought to increase the input coming from producer gas. size tial (GWP) than CO2 [110]. Incomplete and inefficient a gaseous power plant than in the classic power plant during combustion by traditional cookstoves produce significant quanti- the combustion of biomass and steam cycle. 13). the CO2 emission by 161 kg per year. 13. increase sustainability of the natural resources base. (2) reduced engine-generator efficiency of 14. . and other organic engine application using coconut shell as a fuel as shown in Fig. Panwar et al. Single stove can save put for dual fuel operation was about 79% of that for diesel fuel about 700 kg of fuel wood per year and at the same time it reduces operation.7% was achieved at a maximum human exposure to health damaging air pollutants.5. It helps to improve health stan- Fig. Besides. 40 ◦ C. N. 12. better indoor air environment and clean kitchen safely run a diesel engine without any tar problems. polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Engine-generator efficiency at dual fuel operation was lower with economic and time saving benefits to the household and than that of diesel fuel operation. 11 is a schematic representation of a biomass-integrated 6. Double pot improved cookstove. fuels. Bhattacharya et al. Improvements in households biomass burning stoves water flow rate. [109] conduct a study on a multi-stage hybrid methane (CH4 ). probability of global climate change [112]. Fig. by Bhattacharya and Salam Abdul [111] and it was concluded Cost of this power plant is estimated to be 2750$/kW and electricity that incomplete combustion of biomass in the traditional cook- costs of 0. With the experimental system. Experimental gasifier–engine system.L. At the optimal (Fig. nitrous oxide (N2 O). and ultra fine particles which have more global warming poten- For this attractive biopower option based on gasification. Emission study was also conducted of biopower plant is 75MW and total efficiency would be  = 36%.03$/kWh [108]. Improved cookstoves performed bet- be removed by passing it through the spray tower so that it could ter fuel economy. Maximum electrical power out. 12. The combustion process in traditional cooking stove is non-ideal This process gives high efficiency of electricity production in and favoring incomplete combustion. Improved cookstove is best solution to overcome this Study report that almost all of the tar content in producer gas could type of emission problems. ing stove released carbon monoxide (CO).

Structure of production and utilization of hydrogen gas. and thus replacing fossil fuels with sustainable biomass fuel is one option that needs Cellulose + H2 O + Air → H2 + CO + CH4 consideration in reducing CO2 emissions. does not exist in nature in its elemental form. Panwar et al. heaters. Conclusion the main advantages and limitations of converting biomass to A comprehensive literature survey of major renewable energy gadgets for domestic and industrial applications such as solar water Table 8 Conditions of thermal treatment of biomass [96]. hydrogen generates no pollutants. The system 3. ing of the syngas. hydrogen. Hydrogen is gaining increasing attention as an encouraging future energy [89]. When burnt with oxygen. 2.L. Most H2 is currently produced from nonrenewable sources Catalyticsteamreformingofbiomass → H2 + CO2 + CO such as oil. Solidwaste → CO + H2 tages of biomass to hydrogen are: Biomass + H2 O + Air → H2 + CO2 1. which can return to nature. The fuel cell is connected to the storage tank via pressure hydrogen from woody biomass is mainly carried out via two reduction valves to generate electricity. kinetic energy of wind and water. pressure resistance and hydrogen aging dard of women and child. solar cookers. by electrolysis from water or by chemical processes from hydrocarbons or other hydrogen carriers. to develop a highly effi- following reactions: cient clean way for large-scale hydrogen production. dryers. The Production of hydrogen from renewable biomass has sev. It has to be separated from chemical com. Production of hydrogen from biomass electrolyzer with a limited DC current flow to de compose the water electrochemically into gases.0 600–2000 mitigation for clean and sustainable development. including visionaries like Jules Verne. hydrogen and oxygen (H2 and O2 ). or The main gaseous products from biomass are [94] the following: geothermal heat. The electricity for the hydrogen. Hydrogen as fuel Hydrogen has fascinated generations of people for centuries.1–1.5–2.0 vation in developing nations. biomass gasifiers. and (b) fast pyrolysis followed by reforming of the carbohydrate fraction of the bio-oil [94. The residues conversion increases the value of agricultural out. Table 8 shows the conditions of thermal treatment of electrolysis may come eventually from clean renewable sources biomass. Table 7 shows 8. 14. improved cookstoves and biodiesel was made. wind energy. also reduces the burden of fuel collection [113]. Thermochemical conver- sion processes such as pyrolysis and gasification of biomass have Gasificationofbiomass → H2 + CO2 + CO + N2 considerable potential for producing renewable hydrogen. Advantages Use of biomass reduces CO2 emissions Crop residues conversion increases the value of agricultural output Replacing fossil fuels with sustainable biomass fuel Costs of getting rid of municipal solid wastes Limitations Seasonal availability and high costs of handling Nontotal solid conversion (char formation) and tars production Process limitations: corrosion. produced gases are pumped intermediately into high pressure stor- eral advantages compared to that of fossil fuels [93]. trolyzer. cooler.1522 N. Therefore. only water. and to lessen dependence on insecure fossil energy sources [92]. hydrogen may become an important Pyrolysisofbiomass → H2 + CO2 + CO + Hydrocarbongases link between renewable physical energy and chemical energy car- riers [90].95]. in a closed loop production thermochemical processes: (a) gasification followed by reform. the most common chemical element on the planet. Hydrogen is expected to play a key role in the world’s energy future by replacing fossil fuels. elec- resources are constrained. which are integrated in one system. The use of biomass reduces CO2 emissions. and coal [91]. 14. and fuel cell. biogas technology. ionizer.1. storage unit. pump. Process Temperature (K) Heating rate (K/s) Solid residence time (s) The review gives an overview of the development and scope of CO2 Pyrolysis 675–875 0. which Hydrogen from organic wastes has generally been based on the is beneficial to exploit biomass resources. Biodiesel from nonedible vegetable . 7. pounds. Producing age tanks. The costs of getting rid of municipal wastes are mounting as land consists of a solar plant (photo-voltaic energy stand-alone). Fig. However. liquefier. Its conversion to heat or power is simple and clean. The main advan. such as solar radiation. tion to generate electrical energy is shown in Fig. and utilization cycle of hydrogen and oxygen [97]. The use of solar Fast pyrolysis 975–1225 250–300 1–3 drying of agricultural produce has good potential for energy conser- Gasification 975–1225 300–500 0. The closed loop system of hydrogen production and its utiliza- put. natural gas. The PV energy powered the 7. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 1513–1524 Table 7 Main Advantage and limitation of biomass to hydrogen [92].

and Environmental Effects 2001. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2010. [27] Lafforgue G.78:321–9. Adaptation for crop agriculture to climate change 2004. 2007. Rural versus urban preferences for renew.23:141–68.8:349–70. Utilization.44(3):218–23. energy. References Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2005. Udaipur [36] Kumar A. Rivington M. The author (N. [38] Xiaowu W. Goic R.com. International Journal of Sustainable Energy 2006. Renew- [1] UNDP. Recovery. Energy Sources. heaters network in steam power plants using pinch technology and exergy Energy 2008. Journal of [45] Kalogirou AS. vulnerability and public health. Life cycle assessment of photovoltaic electricity generation. Industrial energy efficiency and climate change mitigation. Utilization. Wagner HJ. Popiel PO.31(3):409–25.67:589–97. Can solar cooking save the forests? Ecological Economics 1999. the economy and the environment. Renewable [43] Xiao C. carbon monoxide. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2000. society. International Journal of Sustainable Energy [15] Rathore NS. [40] Piacentini RD. Energy [53] Kumar A.26(12):1119–29. Energy Utilization. Climate change and drying of agricultural prod- [2] Dincer I.27(5):629–35. and Environmental Effects 1998. Biofuels-renewable energy sources: a review. Usmani JA. 5–6. Energy Sources. Renewable energy and sustainable development: a crucial review. Solar Energy also tend to increase nitrogen oxide emissions [115. and Environmental Effects 2002. [18] Reddy AKN. reduces hydrocar. Energy 2004. Renewable and Sustainable Energy utilization. Thermal performance.23(1):83–92. Subramanian DK.13(6–7):1185–210.29(13):1203–14. Solar cookers cheap technology with high ecological benefits.120:585–96. Grupp M. Zhou W. [8] Farhad S. Lu S.14:312–22. Utilization.25(3):275–80. Utilization. Applied Solar Energy 2008. case of Turkey. Usage of energy sources and environmental problems. explicitly points out the greenhouse gas emission mitigation poten. Part A: Recovery. How solar cooking works. Energy Sources.26(3):159–66. Harnisch J. Luo H. and Environmental Effects 2001. Review of modern wind turbine technology. Kumar NK. Biomass. Kawabe T. Renewable energy: a response to climate change.83:39–48. CO2 emissions mitigation potential of some renewable (Rajasthan). Panwar et al.24(6):549–59. Solar cooker acceptance in South Africa: time it also reduces fuel collection burden for them. N. and Environmental Effects [20] Tingem M. Utilization. Part A: Recovery. sponsorship under the quality improvement programme of the and Environmental Effects 2007. 1998 ed. system which utilizes solar energy. A: Recovery. Life cycle assessment of solar PV based [13] Nielsen JBH.29(6):563–9. Part A: Recovery.353:11–2. Part A: Recovery.29:137–54. Zhong H.35(3):1909–19. [11] Horst GH. Solar drying and CO2 emissions mitigation: potential [3] Bilgen S. Solar Energy 2005. India. Chen CR. Hall DO. Younessi-Sinaki. [41] Kumar A. Renewable energy activities in Senegal: a [50] Sakamoto Y.14:540–4. 1989. Acknowledgements [34] Layton J. 2001. Utilization. gases where wind potential is available. New Delhi. Hovorka AJ. [49] Topcu YI. Delhi for energy technologies in India. New Delhi: Tata McGraw- [19] Ravindranath NH. Pouris A.65:616–25. II. mercialisation. Vijayaraghavan S. The development impact of solar cookers: a sources and fuel replaced by it. Kaygusuz K. Electricity production using solar energy. Kane MM. Hepbasli A.20(4):427–53. analysis. Academy of Science. and environment: a developing Hill.L.100:5478–84. At the same [30] Biermann E. Zhou W. Pain D. for renewable energy systems in India. Energy Sources. Exergy analysis of domestic-scale solar water heaters. Roy J. Utilization. Ecological Economics 2008. Bernstein L. Performance analysis of a CO2 recycling Africa? Biomass and Bioenergy 2009. Recovery. in Cameroon: turning on the heat. Energy Sources. [14] Demirbas A. tives. 2007. Indian Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2010. to rural women and improve their health standards. [21] Haines A. Press. New York: UNDP. [37] Jyotirmay M. Magné B. March [17] Bergmann A. Energy Policy 2007. and Environmental Effects 2007. Energy Efficiency 2009. . Climate change [59] Balat M. Global renewable energy resources. Solar Energy Recovery. Energy substitutions.24(1):19–26. Cooling the greenhouse with bioenergy. Maulana Azad College of Technology. ment. Renewable energy sources for sustainable develop. Wind 2004. Iniyan S. therefore. The improved cookstoves provide better kitchen environment nologies. Energy Sources. 2006. p. 1995. Mitigation and Adaptation Strate. Energy Sources. Utilization. Colombo S. Ben H. Energy and environmental correlation Government of India. ability.9:638–45. rana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology. [52] Sherwani AF. Energy Sources. economic and environmental life cycle analysis of thermosiphon solar water heaters. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for [58] Balat M. Scientific and technical arguments for the optimal use of energy. Bhopal. Solar thermal collectors and applications. Environmental Issues. Kovats RS. able and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2008.30:231–95. Seadi TA. I. Bangalore 1980:109–30. Solar Energy 2004.33:224–32. Geneva: IEA. Utilization. Part A: ucts.116]. In: Proceedings of the National Conference on Wind Energy Com- energy sources. climate change and The application of biomass gasifier at small scale industries is carbon sinks. solar photovoltaic pumps in India.29:1549–56. Recent advances in biomass conversion technologies. biodiesel improves combustion and. http://science.26(9):891–901. Barthelmie RJ. Varun. Sarr J.76:9–17.66(6):401–7. 2000 (ISBN 9211261260). [39] Sharma A. Kothari DP. Paris: IEA/OECD. Bioenergy to mitigate for climate change and meet the needs of ments in solar energy. found suitable and it save considerable amount of conventional [28] IEA. [56] Nagrath IJ.23(1):69–81. New and emerging develop- [9] Sims REH. Saffar-Avval M.6:19–40. Wind farm development – Government [16] Zakhidov RA. Lan NV. tial depending on the use and availability of renewable energy [32] Wentzel M. for selected cash crops in India. Progress in Energy Dispersion Science and Technology 2010. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2001. 1994. Oxford. Part A: [44] Mills D. Ecological Economics 2008. [54] Thapar V. economy. Bioresource Technology 2009. Giovannini B. and particulate emissions. [5] Demirbas A.htm [17 March 2010].14:430–7. Kandpal TC. and Environmental Effects 2009. [31] Tucker M. HowStuffWorks.33:1605–16.L. Part A: [46] Okoro OI. and Environmental [42] Demirbas MF. Campbell-Lendrum D.5:299–312. able future. Drying Technology 2009. [48] Goswami DY.31(17):1561–72. Part A: Global Change 2009. Sjöblom J. Sari A. Tang R. Ulgen K. [6] Kralova I. Panwar) gratefully acknowledges Maha.25(1):23–31. World Energy Outlook. Efficient design of feedwater [47] Stoppato A. Palmer R. Williams RH.howstuffworks. Energy Explo- and human health: impacts. Utilization. Climate change impacts on wind energy: a review. International Journal of Energy Research 2008. [7] Dincer I. Solar energy: a necessary investment in a developing Recovery. Journal of Energy Research 2000. Corvalan C. Reviews 2010. Energy Sources. Energy Sources. Hanley N. Energy 2004.2:109–23. Solar thermal utilization in China. country perspective from India.28(8):779–92. India: New India Publishing Agency. Wind and wave power potential. Ecological Economics 1996. The presence of oxygen in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2000. Part Effects 2004. A review of solar thermal tech- fuel. Mynick HE. 1998. nically competitive with or offer technical advantages compared [23] Dincer I. 03 February 2009. The paper results of a comparative field-test. Kandpal TC. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 1513–1524 1523 oil reduces carbon dioxide emissions and petroleum consumption [22] Dincer I. Geothermal energy for the benefit of the people. Fuelwood: the “other” renewable energy source for [51] Sakamoto Y. 2004. Energy for the future: an integrated decision aid for the gies for Global Change 2003. Central Asian countries energy system and role of renewable incentives. Renewable energy for a clean and sustain. oxygenated fuels [25] Sims REH. Tamm G. 152–5. Power system engineering. 1999. World energy assessment 2000 – energy and the challenge of sustain.76:33–43.76:19–31. able energy developments. Part A: Recovery. Public Health ration and Exploitation 2005.com/solar-cooking. United Kingdom: Oxford University [57] Ozgener O. and Combustion Science 2004.31:77–89. [55] Pryor SC.17:73–81.4(2):157–75. Sall M. [4] Fridleifsson IB. Ulengin F. Sharma A. Agnihotri G. bon. Moreaux M. The future of anaerobic digestion and biogas electricity generation systems: a review. Environmental issues. India and Indian Institute of Technology. review of solar cooking impact research in South Africa. energy also present good potential in minimization of greenhouse [26] Worrell E. Mujumdar AS. Energy analysis of a CO2 recycling system. Advances in solar thermal electricity technology. Solar-energy drying systems: a review. Price L. The design of rural energy centers. International review. Madueme TC. Potential solutions.4(1):75–89.32:1–11. [10] Youm I. Energy and environmental impacts: present and future perspec- when used in place of conventional diesel [114]. Solar Energy 1999. [33] Nandwani SS. Panwar NL. Nature 1991. to conventional petroleum diesel fuel. Solar Energy 2009. Biodiesel is tech. Potential and cost of CO2 emissions mitigation by using Educational Science and Technology 2000. Kandpal TC. and Environmental Effects 2006. International Journal of Energy Research [12] Hall DO.14:153–68. [29] Thirugnanasambandam M. [35] Kalogirou S. [24] Aebischer B.

Muraleedharan C. Biennial report of thermo chemical conversation technology of 354–7. alternative fuel: experimental analysis and energetic evaluations. Stoppato A. Hydrogen gas production and utilization as elec- of biogas production. A study on a multi-stage hybrid gasifier- 2008.33:155–8. Experimental studies on producer gas generation Journal MC 2008. Performance and emission evalua. Patel SR. Paul PJ. with scrubbed biogas for power generation. Kim J. [112] Smith KR. Global Warming 2009. Bioresource Technology 1991.22:305–17. Mann M. [70] Tademirolu E. Energy Educa- of biogas stove for community cooking application. Babu BV. Economics of biogas space heating systems in rural Turkey. Bioenergy 2008. CO2 mitigation potential from biodiesel renewable energy systems. Narra M. [92] Demirbas MF. 2006.25:741–63.30:245–9. Panwar NL. Performance tion – a substitute to fossil fuel for heat application. Water cess.30:1789–800. [67] Kurchania AK. Korea. Mirandola A. Chen XJ. Biomass to hydrogen via Bioenergy. Current Science [73] International Energy Outlook. Busan. Srivastava NSL. Hla SS.1007/s10098-009-0269-5 [published online first]. DC: Department of Energy. Zhang J. stroke natural aspirated directed injection diesel engine. Biomass and 23–30. Guo LJ. International Journal of tional Science and Technology 2000. uary 2002. Govt.31:466–87. 2010.36:1507–18. Progress in of Dispersion Science and Technology 2010. Utilization. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2003. the sustainability option. energy. Sharma D. core downdraft biomass gasifier for food processing industry. 1993. Sjöblom J. [87] Beer T. Rathore NS.19:2185–8. More GR. Sustainable Energy 2010. International Journal of cooking in the developing countries. .85:849–60. Performance evaluation of duel fuel engine and Biorefining 2008.1524 N. Eliasson B.IEA-Biogas.40:728–34.1:170–8. [102] Chawla S. Khalil MAK. tricity using a renewable energy source. Utilization. Low greenhouse gas biomass option for tion engine operating on castor oil methyl ester. Biomass and Bioenergy and emission study of mahua oil (madhuca indica oil) ethyl ester in a 4. Larson ED. areas. Mitigation and [77] Naik M. Utilization. An appraisal of critical materials problems in biomass Souza AG. Mukunda HS. Internal Energy Outlook information admin. Experimental investigation of open Energy 2005. approach to utilize all parts of Jatropha curcas fruit for energy. Environmental systems analysis of biogas systems.1(1–3):365–77. Biomass and Bioenergy 2008. engine system. [accessed on 20. Biofuels – renewable energy sources: a review. Vyas DK. Masjuki HH. [113] Panwar NL. Biomass and Bioenergy 2006. fast pyrolysis and catalytic steam reforming of the pyrolysis oil or its fractions.15:127–67.100:5478– Effects 2006. Grant T. Candeia RA. 2009. Berglund M. Teodorescu R. Tonon S. http://www. engines. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment [100] Dasappa S. 2005 [from internet: [101] Palit D.87(7):908–16. Current Science 2003. and Environmental digestion and biogas utilization. Biomass gasifica- [75] Puhan S. Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society 1998. tion of a diesel engine fueled with methyl esters of rubber seed oil.2:393–414. Jan. Nadre RG. Bioresource Technology 2009.31(3):409–25. [61] Singh S. Shah NP. Mukunda HS. [62] Thomas BG. from wood waste in a downdraft biomass gasifier.30:469–85. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change [84] Bala BK. 2004. Biodiesel production from vegetable oils via catalytic and non- [86] Kralova I. evaluation of an agricultural residue based modular throat type down draft [76] Ramadhas AS. Savita PD. adoption of improved. [63] Weiland P. Application of [91] Zhang H. ium acetobutylicum in an unsaturated flow reactor. Biofuels Bioproducts [71] Meena M. Kurchania AK. Rathore NS. Czernik S. Production of biodiesel from high free Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 2009. Energy and Combustion Science 2005. Bioresource Technology [72] Pathak H.32:1116–22. Energy Sources. Jatropha and Karanj for utilization in electrical generator. [81] Chung KH. The emission characteristics of a compression igni. Water Research [64] Borjesson P. Quality management of AD residues from biogas production. [96] Demirbas A. and Environmental Effects 1999. potential of biogas plants in India. International Journal of Sustainable Energy [80] Kalbande SR. Technological options for producing hydrogen from renewable [65] Holm-Nielsen JB. Journal catalytic supercritical methanol transesterification methods. [93] Nath K. Global warming mitigation 2009. [74] Conceicao MM.html. Vedaraman N. Biogas production: current state and perspectives. gasification technology – a route to meet energy needs. Salam Abdul P. Bioenergy Research [109] Bhattacharya SC.6:1–18. Energy for Sustainable Development 1994. Energy Educational Science and Technology 2005. Naik SN. Bhoi PR. Joshi V. Performance 2005.53:17–9. Mohanty S.L. Biodiesel as [85] Schuchardt U.I(4):23–9. Testing palm biodiesel and NPAA additives to con. 2002.157:407–18. evaluation of a diesel engine fueled with methyl ester of castor seed oil. Biomass gasifier systems for thermal applications in rural 21/11/2009]. www.14:569–78. Soledade LEB. Abdel-Rehim ZS.18(3):29–70. Biomass pyrolysis: a state-of-the-art review. Part A: Recovery.36:147–55. Mitigation of greenhouse gases by Applied Thermal Engineering 2010. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 1997. Sridhar HV.15:1–45. Das LM. Journal of [90] Bossel U. Macor A. Fernandes Jr VJ. Bhatia A. 210. Energy Sources. fatty acid Karanja (Pongamia pinnata) oil. Conversion processes in anaerobic digestion. [114] Carraretto C.29(2):116–23. Biomass and Energy 2008. Ricardo Sercheli R. Mande S. In: Proceedings of 6th International Conference of castor seed oil in Indian context. October 18–22. Oleskowicz-Popiel P. Montane D. and Environmental Effects Science and Technology 1983. Sridhar G. Renewable [105] Panwar NL.30:1269–78. Shrirame HY.csiro. Energy and Fuels gasifier system.9:199– 2004. Sharma AM. Biodiesel production from non-edible oils of 2007. Rheological behavior of castor oil biodiesel. Vargas RM. Energy Sources. Das D.11. Wind energy for the 1990s and beyond. Jovanovic M.26(4):179–93. doi:10.100:3127–33. Institution of Engineers (India) [99] Sheth PN. Hydrogen production from glu- solutions. Biomass and Bioenergy 2002. Shrirame HY. SPRERI experience on holistic nology. Part A: Recovery. Hydrogen from biomass. 2009. Bharat Ram BV. Biological hydrogen production by Clostrid- Microbiology and Biotechnology 2010. Urquhart J. Part A: Recovery. Panwar et al. Energy Sources. Paul PJ. Part A: Recovery. Annual Review of 2009.28(13):1215–23. p. submitted to ICAR. The future of anaerobic resources. 2004. Panwar NL. Lee KY. [115] Demirbas A. Task 24–Energy from Biological Conversion of Organic Waste. istration. Renewable [108] Afgan NH. Biomass 2009. Carvalho MG. Al Seadi T. bleak? Cogeneration and Distributed Generation Journal 2003. Chen Z. Pham HL. Biomass gasifier gas turbine power generating Tech- [79] Singh RN. of India. Sridhar G.10(2–3):149–66. Assessment of energy performance in the life-cycle [97] Fahmy FH. Taylor G. Rajan NKS. culture and agro based industries. 2003. [107] Williams RH. Biomass and Bioenergy 2006. 84. Jain N. Bhave AG.30:254–66. Kishore VVN. Health.25(6):637–49. Greenhouse duck tallow with methanol on alkali catalysts. Design and performance evaluation [95] Caglar A. Kurchania AK.net. Biomass and Bioenergy implications of household stoves: an analysis for India. The global climate challenge: recent trends in CO2 emis- sions of biodiesel blends in Australia. Bruns MA. [69] Berglund M.21(7):629–41. Liserre M. Biomass and Bioenergy 1996. 2005. and Environmental cose used as a model compound of biomass gasified in supercritical water. Rathore NS. Borjesson P.85:265–71. The future of the hydrogen economy: bright or Energy Conversion and Management 1996. Gupta N. Hydrogen: as an attractive fuel in future. Kothari DP. Bhatti TS. Energy and the Environment 2000. The greenhouse and air quality emis.28:55–64. Uma R. 2007. Sankaranarayanan G. Biomass-fired power plant: Energy 2008. [111] Bhattacharya SC.2009].33:1868–73.29:2195–211. Mao X. Biodiesel production by transesterification of [110] Smith KR. Jayaraj S. and greenhouse-gas impact of biomass combustion [83] Panwar NL. Dantas HJ. Kurchania AK.88:37–41. Chornet E. Shrirame HY. Zhang XM.32: [106] Panwar NL. Transesterification of veg. Washington. [116] Demirbas B. trol NOx and CO while improving efficiency in diesel engine. IEA [94] Wang D. Performance in household stoves. Effects 2004. Clean Technology Environmental Policy on Power Electronics (ICPE’04). Hydrogen production from biomass by the gasification pro- [68] Gujer W. Sridhar HV. Utilization. [66] Al Seadi T. Boiling Point 2007. Biomass and Bioenergy 2001. Fuel-cycle emissions. gasifier for thermal application. Ozmen H. all India coordinated research project on renewable energy sources for agri- [78] Kalam MA. Energy etable oils: a review.32:72–7. Bamniya BR.24:59–68. Zehnder AJB.21:445–60. Kishore VVN. Renewable Energy [104] Pathak BS.37:1741–52. New Delhi: Tata Energy Research Institute. Studies on biodiesels from transformation of vegetable oils for diesel 2009. [82] Panwar NL. Energy Educational Science and Technology pf13o. Part I. [98] Babu BV. Logan BE. Power converters and control of [88] Panwar NL.22:179–93.14:547–56. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 1513–1524 [60] Blaabjerg F. [103] Dasappa S.26(9):811–819. Jindal S. Meher LC. Campbell PK.au/resources/ sions from fuel combustion. Indian scenario of wind energy: problems and [89] Hao XH.