Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Custom Search
Concrete Pavement Membership Bookstore Events & Programs News & Views Contact Us
Flexural Tests | Compressive Tests | Splitting Tensile Tests | Correlation | Importance of Using Average
Strength | ACPA's Position on Strength
Flexural Tests
The concrete strength used in the design of concrete pavements is based on AASHTO Test Method T-97 or ASTM
C78, Flexural Strength of Concrete using a Simple Beam with Third-Point Loading (see Figure 1 below). These
flexural tests (also called Modulus of Rupture tests or Third-Point Loading tests) are performed using concrete
beams that have been cast and cured in the field, to mimic field conditions. For AASHTO thickness design, it is
important that the third point loading 28-day flexural strength be used use in the AASHTO equation. If the
strength values are measured using some other test method, it must be converted to the 28-day third-point
strength.
Some agencies use the center-point flexural strength test (AASHTO T-177 or ASTM C293) to determine their
concrete strength (see Figure 2). Center-point loading forces the beam to fail directly under the center of the
loading. This may or may not be the weakest point in the beam. In third point loading, the entire middle one-third
of the beam is stressed uniformly and thus the beam fails at its weakest point in the middle one-third of the beam.
By forcing the beam to fail at the center, the center-point flexural test results are somewhat higher than the third-
point test results. Typically, the center point results are about 15% greater. Though this relationship is not exact, it
does provide a reasonable estimate of the concrete's average strength.
Jon Smith
National Sales Manager
MULTIVIEW
Office: 972.402.7023 | Fax: 972-402-7035
Email: jsmith@multiview.com
http://1204075.sites.myregisteredsite.com/Concrete_Pavement/Technical/FATQ/Construction/Strength_Tests.asp 1/4
3/1/2018 What are the strength tests?
Splitting tensile tests involve compressing a cylinder or core on its side until a crack forms down the middle,
causing failure of the specimen.
Correlation
There are many papers, articles, and opinions on the correlation between the different strength test types, and
ACPA does not recommend any one test in particular. As for the correlation between the three test types, most of
the following equations can be used, noting that the variance in the coefficients and equations can be attributed to
regional, climatic, and material properties, among others.
Let:
Splitting Tensile Strength = Fst
Compressive Strength = Fc
Flexural Strength = MR (Modulus of Rupture), third-point loading (unless otherwise noted)
Center for Transportation Research / Carrasquillo, R. MR (3rd Point) = 0.86 x MR (Center Point)
MR = 1.296 Fst
MR = Fst + 150
http://1204075.sites.myregisteredsite.com/Concrete_Pavement/Technical/FATQ/Construction/Strength_Tests.asp 2/4
3/1/2018 What are the strength tests?
NOTE: When High-Performance Concrete is used, the above relationhips will not necessarily hold true. The HPC
mixes with very low w/c ratios tend to be more brittle and show different behaviors.
Additional Sources:
Raphael, J.M., "TENSILE STRENGTH OF CONCRETE," ACI Journal, Vol. 81, Number 2, Mar-Apr 1984 pp.
158-165
Popovics, S., "Strength and related properties of concrete: a quantitative approach", New York, 1998.
Grieb. W.E. and G. Werner, "Comparison of Splitting Tensile Strength of Concrete with Flexural and
Compressive Strength," American Society for Testing and Materials, Proceedings, Vol 62, pp 972-995, 1962.
Grieb, W.E., and Werner, G., “Comparison of the Splitting Tensile Strength of Concrete with Flexural and
Compressive Strengths”, Public Roads, V. 32, No. 5, Dec. 1962, pp. 97-106.
The expected actual average 28-day flexural strength (S'c) of the concrete should be used in thickness design
procedures. Using the specified minimum construction strength will cause the design to be too conservative.
Therefore, it is necessary to correct the specified minimum strength to the design strength using the following
equation:
S'c = Sc + z(s)
where:
To use this equation, the designer must know or have estimate values of:
The values for z are derived from basic statistics and are shown in the following table:
The standard deviation (s) of the strength test results depends upon the variability of the concrete and accuracy of
the testing. Contractors generally use either central-mix or ready-mix plants to produce concrete. These plants are
capable of providing very uniform concrete. Historically, the standard deviation (s) for ready-mix concrete is about
7 to 13 percent of the average strength. The standard deviation (s) for central-mix concrete is from 5 to 12 percent
of the average strength. Generally, records of the standard deviation from past plant operations are available. The
following example demonstrates the above procedure to account for the average, in-field 28-day flexural strength.
Example: Suppose that you want to design a small street project. You know that several local operators supply
most of the concrete in your area using ready-mix concrete. You also know that you will specify concrete with a
minimum 28-day flexural strength of 550 psi (3.79 MPa) and your specification will permit 10 percent of the tests
to fall below that level. What strength do you use in the AASHTO design equation?
Step 1: Estimate the "s" using s = 9 percent of the flexural strength; or, call several ready mix operators to
determine the value. Since you do not know the actual average strength, use the specified value for S'c (it will be
fairly close). The value for s then becomes:
s = 0.09 (550)
s = 49.5 psi
Step 2: Estimate the design strength to use in the equation. Apply the correction for a 10 percent failure rate
(z: = 1.282)
S'c = 550+ 1.282(49.5)
S'c = 614 psi (4.22 MPa)
Note: The same principle applies if compressive strengths are used. The corrected compressive strength would be
converted to third-point flexural strength using any one of the relationships previously shown. In the example, 614
psi (4.22 MPa) would be the value to use in the design equations. For comparison, the average 28-day flexural
strength at the AASHO road test was 690 psi (4.76 MPa) third-point loading.
In 1997, the members of the American Concrete Pavement Association gave their opinion on the preferred
methods of strength evaluation to use for acceptance of concrete pavement. To view this position paper, click here.
http://1204075.sites.myregisteredsite.com/Concrete_Pavement/Technical/FATQ/Construction/Strength_Tests.asp 3/4
3/1/2018 What are the strength tests?
http://1204075.sites.myregisteredsite.com/Concrete_Pavement/Technical/FATQ/Construction/Strength_Tests.asp 4/4