J. Bio. & Env. Sci.

2017

Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences (JBES)

ISSN: 2220-6663 (Print) 2222-3045 (Online)
Vol. 11, No. 1, p. 266-273, 2017
http://www.innspub.net

RESEARCH PAPER OPEN ACCESS

Water quality and risk assessment of tributary rivers in San

Fernando, Bukidnon Philippines

Van Ryan Kristopher R. Galarpe*1, Kristal Jane L. Heyasa2, Brawner Brian L. Heyasa3

Department of Environmental Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of

1

Southern Philippines, Philippines

Bachelor of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Northern Philippines, Philippines
2

Department of Electronics Engineering, University of Science and Technology of Southern Philippines,

3

Philippines

Article published on July 30, 2017

Key words: San Fernando, Bukidnon, Tigua river, Salug river, River tributaries, Heavy metals

Abstract
Bukidnon, Philippines being identified as an agricultural province needs to ensure water sustainability vital to
support its agroeconomy. This study considered Tigua River with three river tributaries and Salug River with
single station in San Fernando, Bukidnon. Analysis employed single sampling technique to initially assess river
tributaries. Studied water quality parameters were pH, temperature, dissolved oxygen (DO), oxidizing redox
potential (ORP), turbidity, salinity, conductivity, total dissolved solids (TDS) using portable pre-calibrated
meters. Nitrates were also determined using Bruccine colorimetric method. Analyzed heavy metals in total
form were copper (Cu), cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb), and chromium (Cr) using Flame-Atomic absorption
spectrophometry (AAS). Overall, studied river tributaries passed national regulation with risk quotient (RQ)
showing no potential pollution. Heavy metals were below detection limit indicating less traceable quantities in
river tributaries. Salinity, conductivity, and TDS showed positive correlation. The study was preliminary and
further monitoring may be needed.
*Corresponding Author: Van Ryan Kristopher R. Galarpe  vanryangalarpe@gmail.com

266 | Galarpe et al.

 J. Bio. & Env. Sci. 2017

Introduction In particular, the munipicality of San Fernando had

The province of Bukidnon coined as the watersheds of
Mindanao, Philippines (Broad and Cavanagh, 1988)
have a total of alienable and disposable land of
336,412 ha (40.56%) while 492,966 ha are forestland.
Covered in these land classification are two major
river watersheds, namely, Salug and Pulangi
(Sumbalan et al., 2001). The major river tributary to
these watersheds are the Tigua River as the water
source for Pulangi and the Salug River as the water
source for the Salug River watershed and the Davao
River on the further south. Both rivers are located in
the munipality of San Fernando, an agricultural and
forested area in the province of Bukidnon.
As a major tributary of the river watersheds in the
province of Bukidnon, a need to secure its water
resources upstream is viewed essential. In the past
this municipality had experienced deforestation,
flashflood, and drought prompting civil groups and
activists to rally for environmental protection
(Bautista, 2001) which were successful as measure of
conservation efforts. However, no available studies
were conductedto evaluate present institutional
arrangements for sustainable river water quality or
watersheds.
been studied to have a new species and new records of
the genus Doliops Waterhouse, 1841 (Coleoptera:
Cerambycidae) (Barševskis, 2014; Cabras and
Barševskis, 2016). Similarly, Tigua River had been
studied to be one of the diverse rivers in Bukidnon
with gastropod species (Galan et al., 2015). Despite
the existing studies on biodiversity no specific
published study dealt on water quality of these river
tributaries. Thus, this study was conducted to provide
a preliminary study on river tributary water quality in
San Fernando, Bukidnon. The objectives were to
determine selected physicochemical water quality
paramters, determine its status with reference to
standards, and to derive environmental risk
assessment (e.g. risk quotient and river comparison).
Materials and methods
Sampling site
The study site consisted of three sub rivers of Tigua river
and one station in Salug river (Fig. 1-2 & Table 1). The
Tigua river is the main river tributary of Pulangi river in
Bukidnon while Salug river is the tributary river of
Davao river. Both water bodies were located in San
Fernando, Bukidnon. The coordinates of the study sites
were identified using GPS EtREX 20 (Table 1).

Table 1. Description of studied river tributaries in San Fernando, Bukidnon Philippines.

River Station Description Specific Locations Barangays Latitude Longitude
code adjacent to the
river
Salug S1 Salug San Jose river stream to San Jose E 125023.743' N 07045.297'
Bridge Salug river
Tigua T1 Bonacao river stream from Davao Bonacao E 1250 23.854' N 070 47.951'
Bridge Region-Bonacao Sto Domingo
T2 Supitan intersection of 2 river Namnam E 125022.539' N 07050.331'
Bridge 2 streams from Kibungkog Iglugsad
and Bonacao
T3 Halapitan 6 km from Pulangi river Halapitan E 125019.867' N 070 55.539
outflow

a b
Fig. 1. a) Salug river station (S1) and b) the Tigua river tributary station (T1).

267 | Galarpe et al.

 J. Bio. & Env. Sci. 2017

Fig. 2. Map of the study site in San Fernando,
Bukidnon. Tigua river consisted of three river
tributaries connecting towards Pulangi River. Salug
river station outflow towards Davao river.
Sampling technique
One grab sampling on January 1, 2017 was employed
in this study. All containers used were polyethylene
bottles (PET) prewashed with distilled water three
times. Upon sampling the container itself were
washed three times with the river water prior to
sample collection and processing in the laboratory.
Surface river waters were taken from four sampling
stations approximately 3-5 m from the above ground.
Collected samples were subjected to lower
temperature, preventing chemical absorption and ion
interference prior to heavy metal analyses (Galarpe
and Parilla, 2014).
Physicochemical analyses
The turbidity meter LaMotte 2020 was used to
analyze the turbidity of the water samples. The pH,
temperature, conductivity, sanility, TDS, and ORP
were analyzed using Oyster meter. The DO of the
water samples were analyzed using Acorn Series DO
Meter OAKION Manufacturing (code 01X555902).
The analyses of Pb, Cd, Cu, Cr, and nitrates were
conducted in the FAST Laboratories. The Pb in total
form was analyzed using 3030 E. Nitric acid
digestion/3111 B. Direct air acetylene Flame AAS
method. The Cd, Cu, and Cr in total form were
analyzed using 3030 F. Nitric acid-hydrochloric acid
digestion/3111 B. Direct air-acetylene Flame AAS
method, respectively. Nitrates was analyzed using
973.50 Bruccine colorimetric method. All samples
were analyzed in triplicates. Methods of analyses
were adopted from AOAC International (2012) and
APHA-AWWA and WEF (2012).
Data Analyses
One Way-ANOVA was employed to compare the
physicochemical parameters in all study sites at 0.05
level of significance. The Pearson correlation was
similarly used to determine association among
parameters studied. Further, all results were
expressed in terms of mean. To derive an
environmental risk estimate all results were subjected
to Risk Quotient (RQ) analysis. The RQ was
calculated as the ratio between the determined
concentration and the available standard (GEF/
UNDP/IMO, 2004). The calculated RQ of >1 can
gauge the physiochemical parameter to likely pose
environmental risk. The DAO 35 standard was used
for estimating RQ in river water samples (Table 2).

Table 2. Reference standard in the study.

Standard Description
Public Water Supply Class I. This class is intended primarily for waters having watersheds
DENR/DAO 34 which are uninhabited and otherwise protected and which require only approved
Class AA disinfection in order to meet the National Standards for Drinking Water (NSDW) of the
Philippines.
Public Water Supply Class II. For source of water supply that will require complete
DENR/DAO 34
treatment (coagulation, sedimentation, filtration, and disinfection) in order to meet the
Class A
NSDW.
PNSDW (2007) Drinking water guideline

268 | Galarpe et al.

 J. Bio. & Env. Sci. 2017

Results and discussion
Physicochemical analyses
The overall physicochemical parameters were
relatively comparable. Both temperature (27-28 deg
C) and pH ( 6-7) were of the same range.Considerably
the DO concentrations were low in stations T2 and
T3, consequently below the DENR Class AA
standard.Both river tributatries were located adjacent
to the populated area in San Fernando, Bukidnon.
Anthropogenic water pollutants in a form of organic
matter discharges from adjacent community may
have contributed to lower DO levels (Chapman,
1996). The higher conductivity, salinity, and TDS
concentrations were recorded in T2 and T3 as
compared to S1 and T1. Conductivity may indicate
potential levels of ions in water (Chapman, 1996) and
TDS can be associated to carbonates in water samples
(Pip, 2000). Both inorganic and organic chemical
attributes affecting TDS, salinity, and conductivity
can be induced by anthropogenic discharges from
populated area. Strong associaion of TDS, conductivity,
and salinity were similarly determined by other water
quality studies in the Philippines (Galarpe and Parilla,
2012; Galarpe and Parilla, 2014; Achas et al., 2016).
Nonetheless, these parameters were within the normal
range/standard set.
Overall trend showed higher turbidity levels among
river tributaries adjacent to central district of San
Fernando, specifically T2 and T3. This can be
attributed from dust deposition and anthropogenic
runoffs from adjacent communities. Study in the past
similarly showed Tigua sub-watershed with the
highest soil accumulation at 181.25 ton/ha/yr (Marin
and Jamis, 2016).On the other hand, studied metals
(Pb, Cd, Cu, and Cr) were below the detection limit
whereas nitrates were within the range 0.75-1.66
ppm. The nitrates level were higher in S1, site
distinctively sorrounded by agriculutral land (e.g. rice
fields and banana). Consequently, nitrogen leaching
from ploughed land area to river catchment may
increase nitrate concentration (Neill, 1989; Schilling
et al., 2000; Boithias et al. 2014). Summary of results
is shown in Table 3.

Table 3. Summary of the physicochemical analyses of tributary river water.

River Standard
Parameter DENR
S1 T1 T2 T3 PNSDW
Class AA
pH 6.7 6.8 6.7 6.7 6.5-8.5 6.5-8.5
Temp (deg C) 27.2 27.1 27.3 27.6 - -
DO (ppm) 9.87 9.45 4.25 3.9 5.0 -
ORP(mV) 24 24 22 24.7 - -
Conductivity (uS/cm) 179 204 194 205 - -
Salinity (ppm) 90 102 98 102 - -
TDS (ppm) 121 137 130 136 500 500
Turbidity (ntu) 11.2 1.12 10.4 32.9 - 5
Pb (ppm) <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.01 0.05
Cd (ppm) <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 0.003 0.01
Cu (ppm) <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 1.0 1.0
Cr (ppm) <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 0.05 -
Nitrates (ppm) 1.66 0.97 1.01 0.75 7 50

Statistical comparison ORP, TDS, salinity, conductivity, and turbidity in T2

Overall, studied physicochemical parameters showed and T3. Further, the correlation analysis (see Table 5)
significant difference (p <0.05) among river showed strong association among parameters of
tributaries (see Table 4). Statistical results using conductivity-salinity (r = 0.99), salinity-TDS (r
ANOVA confirmed site specific variation with =0.99), and conductivity-TDS (r =1) in all studied
elevated concentrations for pH, temperature, DO, river tributaries (Table 3).

269 | Galarpe et al.

 J. Bio. & Env. Sci. 2017

Present findings were in agreement with the studies Considerably, temperature and turbidity showed
of Köse et al. (2014) and Tokatli et al. (2014) on positive correlation (r = 0.98). River tributary with
stream waters showing positive correlation higher temperature had higher turbidity, indicating
between TDS, conductivity, and salinity. anthropogenic influence to water quality.

Table 4. ANOVA of the physicochemical parameters in river tributaries.

Parameter F-value p-value F-critical Decision
pH 5.507937 0.023942 4.066181 Significant difference
Temp 27.27778 0.000149 4.066181 Significant difference
DO 112.4677 7.02E-07 4.066181 Significant difference
ORP 6.857143 0.013319 4.066181 Significant difference
TDS 456.1349 2.8E-09 4.066181 Significant difference
Salinity 733.2046 4.24E-10 4.066181 Significant difference
Conductivity 437.416 3.31E-09 4.066181 Significant difference
Turbidity 1225.94 5.46E-11 4.066181 Significant difference

Table 5. Correlation coefficient analysis of the physicochemical parameters in river tributaries.

Parameters pH Temp DO ORP Conductivity Salinity TDS Turbidity Nitrates
pH 1 -0.62 0.53 0.19 0.47 0.47 0.54 -0.63 -0.22
Temp 1 -0.81 0.28 0.36 0.33 0.27 0.98 -0.53
DO 1 0.28 -0.44 -0.47 -0.4 -0.68 0.69
ORP 1 0.23 0.14 0.21 0.43 -0.05
Conductivity 1 0.99 1 0.25 -0.95
Salinity 1 0.99 0.20 -0.96
TDS 1 0.16 -0.93
Turbidity 1 -0.39
Nitrates 1

Risk assessment temperature with RQ =1 were mainly due to lowest

The RQ values (Table 6) for all studied river reference standard although the results were
tributaries showed no potential risk with reference within the regulations. It can be extrapolated that
to DENR Class AA and A water standards, and T1, T2, T3, and S1 had good river water quality
PNSDW (2007). The values for pH and during the sampling.

Table 6. RQ of selected physicochemical parameters in studied river tributaries.

S1 T1 T2 T3
Parameter
AA A PNSDW AA A PNSDW AA A PNSDW AA A PNSDW
1.03- 1.03- 1.03- 1.03- 1.03- 1.03- 1.03- 1.03- 1.03- 1.03- 1.03- 1.03-
pH
0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79
1.04- 1.04- 1.03- 1.04- 1.04- 1.03- 1.05- 1.05- 1.03- 1.06- 1.06- 1.03-
Temp
0.91 0.91 0.79 0.90 0.90 0.79 0.91 0.91 0.79 0.92 0.92 0.79
TDS 0.24 0.12 0.24 0.14 0.27 0.27 0.26 0.13 0.26 0.27 0.14 0.27
Nitrates 0.23 0.23 0.03 0.14 0.14 0.019 0.14 0.14 0.015 0.11 0.11 0.015

Comparison to Philippine rivers
Compared parameters were pH, TDS, DO, and
nitrates which were common analyses in studied
rivers in the Philippines. Distinctively, the pH of S1,
T1, T2, and T3 were relatively comparable to Labo
and Clarin Rivers (Labajo-Villantes, 2014).
These rivers were adjacent to agricultural lands and
located primarily in the same region exhibiting
comparable pH. The TDS were similarly comparable
to Labo and Clarin Rivers (Labajo-Villantes, 2014)
and Mama River (Martinez et al., 2011) which were
all located in agricultural areas.

270 | Galarpe et al.

 J. Bio. & Env. Sci. 2017

The DO in T1 and S1 were comparable to Mananga (Martinez et al., 2011) indicating less anthropogenic
River (Flores and Zafaralla, 2012), Labo and Clarin impacts. The nitrate levels were comparable to other
Rivers (Labajo-Villantes, 2014) and Mama River cited river studies (Table 7).

Table 7. Comparison of selected physicochemical properties of river tributaries.

River pH TDS DO Nitrates Reference
Tigua River, Bukidnon This study
T1 6.7 137 9.45 0.97
T2 6.8 130 4.25 1.01
T3 6.7 136 3.9 0.75
Salug River, Bukidnon
S1 6.7 121 9.87 1.66
Butuanon River, Cebu Maglangit et al. (2014)
Upstream 7.17 392.67 4.43 2.07
Midstream 7.60 536.67 0.10 0.16
Downstream 7.26 558.83 0.07 0.06
Buhisan River, Cebu 7.2-7.6 - 0.07-4.4 - Maglangit et al. (2015)
Bulacao River, Cebu 7.4-8.0 - 2.1-8.1 - Maglangit et al. (2015)
Lahug River, Cebu 7.4-7.7 - 0-6.5 - Maglangit et al. (2015)
Mananga River, Cebu 8.03-8.76 - 5.45-6.87 2.28-3.15 Flores and Zafaralla (2012)
Pampanga River, Pampanga 8.29 - 4.37 5.38 Arbotante et al. (2015)
Mamba River, Southern Luzon 8.1 210 6.77 - Martinez et al. (2011)
Labo River 6.40 -8.27 27.0 -71.0 2.40-10.60 0.13 - Labajo-Villantes (2014)
Clarin River, 3.90-11.20 0.90
Misamis Occidental

Conclusion Arbotante, Carolyn, Jennifer Bandao, Agnes

The studied parameters showed site specific De Leon, Camela De Leon, Zenaida Janairo,
variations (p<0.05) and can be ranked T3>T2>T1>S1. Jill Lapuz, Ninez Bernardine Manaloto,
The ranked was extrapolated from anthropogenic
Anabel Nacpil, Fritzie Salunga. 2015. Water
inputs influencing water quality in T3 and T2.
Quality in Pampanga River Along Barangay Buas in
Similarly, a positive correlation among parameters,
namely, TDS, salinity, and conductivity were Candaba, Pampanga. Proceedings of the DLSU

determined. Overall tributary river water quality Research Congress 3, 1-5.

analyses were within the standards. Environmental
risk assessment showed no potential risk as indicated Barševskis A. 2014. New species and new records of
by RQ<1 and descriptive comparable assessment with the genus Doliops Waterhouse, 1841 (Coleoptera:
other river studies in the country. Present findings are Cerambycidae). Baltic J. Coleopterol 14(1), 113-135.
preliminary and further analyses maybe essential.
Bautista G. 2001. Environmental degradation and
References
activist intervention: Reflections on the Philippine
Achas ESM, Paquit KJC, Zambas MKF,
experience. Asian cultural studies special issue (10).
Galarpe VRKR. 2016. Preliminary Analyses of
Domestic Wastewater from Selected Communities in
Boithias L, Srinivasan R, Sauvage S, Macary F,
Cagayan de Oro, Philippines. International Journal of
Sánchez-Pérez JM. 2014. Daily nitrate losses:
Chemical and Environmental Engineering 7(1), 43-45.
implication on long-term river quality in an intensive
AOAC International. 2012 Official Methods of agricultural catchment of southwestern France. Journal
Analysis of AOAC International (19th Ed.).
of environmental quality 43(1), 46-54.
APHA, AWWA, WEF. 2012. Standard Methods for
examination of water and wastewater. 22nd Ed. Broad R, Cavanagh J. 1988. Letter from the
Washington: American Public Health Association. Philippines. Capitalism Nature Socialism 1(2), 137-141.

271 | Galarpe et al.

 J. Bio. & Env. Sci. 2017

Cabras AA, Barševskis A, Review on Doliops Köse E, Tokatlı C, Çiçek A. 2014. Monitoring
Waterhouse. 1841. (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) of stream water quality: A statistical evaluation. Polish
Mindanao, Philippines with description of a new Journal of Environmental Studies 23(5), 1637-1647.
species. Baltic J. Coleopterol 16(2), 143-156.
Labajo-Villantes Y. 2014. Water quality
Chapman DV. ed. 1996. “Water Quality assessment of Labo and Clarin Rivers in Misamis
Assessments: A guide to use Biota, Sediments and Occidental, Philippines. International Journal of
Water” Environmental Monitoring. Second Edition.
Biodiversity and Conservation 6(10), 735-742.
UNESCO, WHO, and UNEP. E & FN Spon, London
UK.
Maglangit FF, Galapate RP, Bensig EO. 2015.
An assessment of the organic pollution level of
Department of Environment and Natural
Buhisan, Bulacao and Lahug rivers, Cebu,
Resources (DENR) Administrative Order No.
Philippines. WALIA Journal 31(S3), 61-64.
34 Series. 1990. Revised Water Usage and
Classification/Water Quality Criteria Amending
Maglangit F, Galapate R, Bensig E. 2014.
Section Nos. 68 And 69, Chapter III of the 1978 NPCC
Rules and Regulation. Physico-chemical Assessment of the Water Quality of
Buhisan River, Cebu, Philippines. International
Flores MJ, Zafaralla M. 2012. An Assessment of Journal of Research in Environmental Science and
the Physicochemical Parameters of Mananga River, Technology 4, 83-87.
Cebu, Philippines. IAMURE International Journal of
Ecology and Conservation 4(1), 1-1. Marin RA, Jamis CV. 2016. Soil erosion status of
the three sub-watersheds in Bukidnon Province,
Galan GL, Ediza MM, Servasques MS, Porquis
Philippines. Advances in Environmental Sciences -
HC. 2015. Diversity of Gastropods in the selected
International Journal of the Bioflux Society 8(2),
rivers and lakes in Bukidnon. International Journal of
194-204.
Environmental Science and Development 6(8), 615.

Martinez FB, Mijares MBB, Galera IC. 2011.

Galarpe VRKR, Parilla R. 2014. Analysis of Heavy
Metals in Cebu City Sanitary Landfill, Philippines.
Journal of Environmental Science and Management
17(1), 50-59.
Galarpe VRK, Parilla RB. 2012. Influence of
seasonal variation on the biophysicochemical
properties of leachate and groundwater in Cebu City
Sanitary Landfill, Philippines. International Journal
of Chemical and Environmental Engineering 3(3).
Assessment of the Water Quality of Mamba River of
Mts. Palaypalay/Mataasna Gulod, Southern Luzon,
Philippines. In International Conference on
Chemistry and Chemical Process. IPCBEE (Vol. 10).
Neill M. 1989. Nitrate concentrations in river waters
in the south-east of Ireland and their relationship
with agricultural practice. Water Research 23(11),
1339-1355.

[GEF/UNDP/IMO] Global Environment Facility/

Philippine National Standards for Drinking
United Nations Development Programme/
Water (PNSDW). 2007. Administrative Order No.
International Maritime Organization. 2004.
2007-012. Department of Health: Philippines.
Manila Bay: refined risk assessment technical report.
www.lwua.gov.ph/tech_mattrs/water_standards.htm
Philippines: Environmental Management for the Seas
of East Asia (PEMSEA), and Manila Bay
Pip E. 2000. Survey of bottled drinking water
Environmental Management Project (MBEMP),
available in Manitoba, Canada. Environmental health
Technical Working Group for Refined Risk
perspectives 108(9), 863.
Assessment (TWG-RRA).

272 | Galarpe et al.

 J. Bio. & Env. Sci. 2017

Schilling KE, Libra RD. 2000. The relationship of Tokatlı C, Köse E, Çiçek A. 2014. Assessment of
nitrate concentrations in streams to row crop land use the effects of large borate deposits on surface water
in Iowa. Journal of Environmental Quality 29(6), quality by multi statistical approaches: a case study of
1846-1851.
the Seydisuyu Stream (Turkey). Polish Journal of
Sumbalan A. 2001. Conservation and management Environmental Studies 23(5), 1741-1751.
of watershed and natural resources: issues in the
Philippines, the Bukidnon experience. World Health Organization (WHO). 2008.
Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality. Available:
Coxhead I, Buenavista G. eds. 2001. Seeking
http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/dwq/f
Sustainability: Challenges of Agricultural
ulltext.pdf.
Development and Environmental Management in a
Philippine Watershed, 218-231. Los Baños,
Philippines: Philippine Council for Agriculture,
Forestry and Natural Resources Research and
Development.

273 | Galarpe et al.