Professional Documents
Culture Documents
5.7 EXAMPLES
As stated in 4.3, to be able to verify the ultimate and serviceability limit states, each
design effect has to be checked and for each effect the largest value caused by the
relevant combination of actions must be used.
However, to ensure that attention is primarily focussed on the EC5 design rules for
the timber or wood product being used, only the design load case producing the largest
design effect has generally been given or evaluated in the following examples.
Example 5.7.1 The column shown in Figure E5.7.1 has a cross-section 150 mm × 200 mm,
is of strength class C18 to BS EN 338:2003, and functions under service class 2 conditions. It
supports a characteristic permanent compressive axial action (including its self-weight) of 30 kN
and a characteristic variable medium-term compressive axial action of 50 kN. The column is
3.75 m high and at each end is effectively held in position but not in direction about the z–z and
the y–y axes.
Check that the column will meet the ultimate limit state (ULS) requirements of EC5.
z
200 mm
A A
L = 3.75 m
y y
z
150 mm
Fig. E5.7.1.
Iy
Radius of gyration about the y–y axis, i y iy = i y = 57.74 mm
A
P1: PAB/RPW P2: PAB
BLUK117-Porteous October 6, 2007 19:24
L e.y
Slenderness ratio about the y–y λy = λ y = 64.95
axis, λ y iy
h · b3
Second moment of area about the Iz = Iz = 5.63 × 107 mm4
z–z axis, Iz 12
iz
Radius of gyration about the z–z iz = i z = 43.3 mm
axis, i z A
L e.z
Slenderness ratio about the z–z λz = λz = 86.6
axis, λz iz
2. Timber properties
Table 1.3, strength class C18 (BS EN 338:2003(E), Table 1)
Characteristic compression f c.0.k = 18 N/mm2
strength parallel to the grain, f c.0.k
5. Modification factors
Factor for medium duration kmod.med = 0.8
loading and service class 2,
kmod.med
(Table 2.4 (EC5, Table 3.1))
System strength factor, ksys not ksys = 1.0
relevant
P1: PAB/RPW P2: PAB
BLUK117-Porteous October 6, 2007 19:24
1
Instability factor, kc.z kc.z = kc.z = 0.37
(equation (5.4b); (EC5, kz + k z2 − λ2rel.z
equation (6.26))
Design buckling strength, kc.z · f c.0.d = 4.15 N/mm2
kc.z f c.0.d (equation (5.7b))
σc.0.d
Design stress/design = 0.93
buckling strength ratio kc.z · f c.0.d
(equation (5.11b))
The design stress is less than the design buckling strength; therefore the 150 mm by 200 mm
timber section in strength class C18 meets the ULS requirements of EC5.
P1: PAB/RPW P2: PAB
BLUK117-Porteous October 6, 2007 19:24
Size factor, kh (Table 2.11;
1.0 if h ≥ 150 mm
EC5, equation (3.1)) (the
150 mm 0.2
150 mm 0.2
equation incorporates a kh =
if 1.3 >
dimensional correction
h h
1.3 otherwise
factor for Mathcad)
kh = 1.04
System strength factor, ksys = 1.0
ksys – not relevant
6. Tensile strength of timber
The critical design load case at the ULS will be due to the combination of permanent and
unfavourable medium-duration actions:
Nd
Design tension stress σt.0.d = σt.0.d = 1.49 N/mm2
parallel to the grain, σ A net
t.0.d
Example 5.7.3 The column shown in Figure E5.7.3 has a cross-section 100 mm × 200 mm,
is of strength class C24 to BS EN 338:2003, and functions under service class 2 conditions. It
supports a characteristic permanent compressive action of 10 kN and a characteristic variable
medium-term compressive action of 17.5 kN. The loading is applied 25 mm eccentric from the
y–y axis and 10 mm from the z–z axis as shown in the figure and the permanent action includes
an allowance to cover for the effect of the self-weight of the column. The column is 3.75 m high
and at each end is effectively held in position but not in direction about the z–z and about the
y–y axes.
Check that the column will meet the ULS requirements of EC5.
(Note: the relative slenderness ratio for bending about the y–y axis does not exceed 0.75.)
z
25 mm
10 mm
200 mm
A A
L = 3.75 m
y y
z
100 mm
A–A Lef = 1.0 × L
Fig. E5.7.3.
P1: PAB/RPW P2: PAB
BLUK117-Porteous October 6, 2007 19:24
Note: Because the relative bending slenderness is less than 0.75, there is no need to investigate
lateral torsional instability effects and 5.4.1 will apply.
1. Geometric properties
Actual column length, L L = 3.75 m
Effective length for buckling about the L e.y = 1.0 · L i.e. L e.y = 3.75 m
y–y axis, L e.y
(Table 5.2)
Effective length for buckling about the L e.z = 1.0 · L i.e. L e.z = 3.75 m
z–z axis, L e.z
(Table 5.2)
Width of the member, b b = 100 mm
Depth of the member, h h = 200 mm
Cross-sectional area, A A =b·h A = 2 × 104 mm2
b · h3
Second moment of area about the y–y Iy = I y = 6.67 × 107 mm4
axes, I y 12
2I y
Section modulus about the y–y axes, Wy = W y = 6.67 × 105 mm3
Wy h
Iy
Radius of gyration about the y–y axis, iy = i y = 57.74 mm
iy A
L e.y
Slenderness ratio about the y–y axis, λy = λ y = 64.95
λy iy
h · b3
Second moment of area about the z–z Iz = Iz = 1.67 × 107 mm4
axis, Iz 12
2Iz
Section modulus about the z–z axis, Wz = Wz = 3.33 × 105 mm3
Wz b
Iz
Radius of gyration about the z–z axis, iz = i z = 28.87 mm
iz A
L e.z
Slenderness ratio about the z–z axis, λz λz = λz = 129.9
iz
2. Timber properties
Table 1.3, strength class C24 (BS EN 338:2003(E), Table 1)
Characteristic bending strength about f m.y.k = 24 N/mm2
the y–y axis, f m.y.k
Characteristic bending strength about f m.z.k = 24 N/mm2
the z–z axis, f m.z.k
P1: PAB/RPW P2: PAB
BLUK117-Porteous October 6, 2007 19:24
λz f c.0.k
Relative slenderness about the λrel.z = · λrel.z = 2.2
z–z axis, λrel.z (equation (5.3); π E 0.05
EC5, equation (6.22))
As both relative slenderness ratios are greater than 0.3, conditions in EC5, 6.3.2(3), apply:
Buckling about z–z axes
Factor βc for solid timber βc = 0.2
(equation (5.6); EC5,
equation (6.29))
Factor k z (equation (5.5b); EC5, k z = 0.5 · 1 + βc · (λrel.z − 0.3) + λ2rel.z k z = 3.12
equation (6.28))
1
Instability factor about the z–z kc.z = kc.z = 0.19
axis, kc.z (equation (5.4b); EC5, kz + k z2 − λ2rel.z
equation (6.26))
Buckling about y–y axes
Factor k y (equation (5.5a); EC5, k y = 0.5 · 1 + βc · (λrel.y − 0.3) + λ2rel.y k y = 1.19
equation (6.27))
1
Instability factor about the y–y kc.y = kc.y = 0.61
axis, kc.y (equation (5.4a); EC5, ky + k 2y − λ2rel.y
equation (6.25))
Redistribution factor for a km = 0.7
rectangular section, km
(equation (4.4c) (EC5, 6.1.6))
Relationships less than unity; therefore the 100 mm by 200 mm sawn section in strength class
C24 will meet the ULS requirements of EC5.
Example 5.7.4 The LVL (Kerto-S) column shown in Figure E5.7.4 has a cross-section
90 mm × 200 mm, and functions under service class 2 conditions. It supports a character-
istic permanent compressive action of 8 kN and a characteristic variable short-term compressive
action of 19.5 kN. The loading is applied 65 mm eccentric from the y–y axis as shown in the
figure and the permanent action includes an allowance to cover for the effect of the self-weight
P1: PAB/RPW P2: PAB
BLUK117-Porteous October 6, 2007 19:24
of the column. The column is 4.15 m high and at each end is effectively held in position but not
in direction about the z–z axis and the y–y axis.
Check that the column will meet the ULS requirements of EC5.
65 mm
A A
L = 4.15 m
200 mm y y
z
90 mm
A–A Lef = 1.0 × L
Fig. E5.7.4.
Iy
Radius of gyration about the y–y axis, i y iy = i y = 57.74 mm
A
L e.y
Slenderness ratio about the y–y axis, λ y λy = λ y = 71.88
iy
P1: PAB/RPW P2: PAB
BLUK117-Porteous October 6, 2007 19:24
h · b3
Second moment of area about the z–z axis, Iz Iz = Iz = 1.22 × 107 mm4
12
Iz
Radius of gyration about the z–z axis, i z iz = i z = 25.98 mm
A
L e.z
Slenderness ratio about the z–z axis, λz λz = λz = 159.73
iz
2. LVL properties
Table1.15 – Kerto S
Characteristic bending strength about the f m.y.k = 44 N/mm2
y–y axis, f m.y.k
Characteristic compression strength parallel f c.0.k = 35 N/mm2
to the grain, f c.0.k
Fifth-percentile modulus of elasticity E 0.05 = 11.6 kN/mm2
parallel to the grain, E 0.05
Fifth-percentile shear modulus, G 0.05 G 0.05 = 0.4 kN/mm2
3. Partial safety factors
Table 2.8 (UKNA to BS EN 1990:2002, Table NA.A1.2(B)) for the ULS
Permanent actions, γG γG = 1.35
Variable actions, γ Q γ Q = 1.5
Table 2.6 (UKNA to EC5, Table NA.3):
Material factor for LVL, γM γM = 1.2
4. Actions
Characteristic permanent compressive G k = 8 kN
action, G k
Characteristic short-term compressive Q k = 19.5 kN
variable action, Q k
Design compressive action for the critical Nd = γG · G k + γ Q · Q k
load combination, Nd
(Table 2.8, equation (c) using the Nd = 4 × 104 N
unfavourable condition variable action)
Moment about the y–y axis:
Eccentricity, ez ez = 65 mm
Design moment about the y–y axis, M y.d = Nd · ez M y.d = 2.6 kN m
M y.d
P1: PAB/RPW P2: PAB
BLUK117-Porteous October 6, 2007 19:24
5. Modification factors
Factor for short-duration kmod.short = 0.9
loading and service
class 2, kmod.short
(Table 2.4 (EC5, Table 3.1))
System strength factor, ksys = 1
ksys – not relevant
Size effect exponent, s s = 0.12
(Table 1.15)
1.0 if h ≥ 300 mm
s
300 mm s
Depth factor for LVL – kh =
300 mm i f 1.2 >
h h
for bending edgewise, kh
1.2 other wise
(Table 2.11 (EC5, 3.4;
BS EN 14374-2004))
kh = 1.05
6. Strength of the column
The design load case at the ULS will be due to the combination of permanent and
unfavourable short-duration variable action:
Moment condition
Design bending moment M y.d = 2.6 kN m
about the y–y axis, M y.d
M y.d
Design bending stress σm.y.d = σm.y.d = 4.34 N/mm2
about the y–y axis, σm.y.d Wy
Buckling resistance condition – lateral torsional buckling under major axis bending
(4.5.1.2 (EC5, 6.3.3)):
f m.y.k
Relative slenderness for λrel.m = λrel.m = 0.89
bending, λrel.m σm.crit
(equation (4.10); EC5,
equation (6.30))
1 if λrel.m ≤ 0.75
1.56 − 0.75.λrel.m if 0.75 < λrel.m ≤ 1.4
Lateral stability factor, kcrit =
kcrit (Table 4.3 (EC5,
1
other wise
equation (6.34))
λ2
rel.m
kcrit = 0.89
Axial compression condition
Nd
Design compression stress, σc.0.d σc.0.d = σc.0.d = 2.23 N/mm2
A
kmod.short · ksys · f c.0.k
Design compression strength, f c.0.d f c.0.d = f c.0.d = 26.25 N/mm2
γM
Buckling resistance condition (5.4.1 (EC5, 6.3.2)):
λy f c.0.k
Relative slenderness about the y–y λrel.y = · λrel.y = 1.26
axis, λrel.y π E 0.05
(equation (5.3); EC5, equation
(6.21))
λz f c.0.k
Relative slenderness about the z–z λrel.z = · λrel.z = 2.79
axis, λrel.z π E 0.05
(equation (5.3); EC5, equation (6.22))
Factor βc for LVL (equation (5.6); βc = 0.1
EC5, equation (6.29))
Factor k y (equation (5.5a); EC5,
equation (6.27))
k y = 0.5 · 1 + βc · (λrel.y − 0.3) + λ2rel.y k y = 1.34
1
Instability factor about the y–y axis kc.y = kc.y = 0.56
(equation (5.4a); EC5, equation k y + k 2y − λ2rel.y
(6.25))
Factor k z (equation (5.5b); EC5,
equation (6.28))
k z = 0.5 · 1 + βc · (λrel.z − 0.3) + λ2rel.z kz = 4.52
1
Instability factor about the kc.z = kc.z = 0.12
z–z axis (equation (5.4b); EC5, kz + k z2 − λ2rel.z
equation (6.26))
P1: PAB/RPW P2: PAB
BLUK117-Porteous October 6, 2007 19:24
2
σm.y.d σc.0.d
Combined stress condition + = 0.7
(equation (5.24); EC5, kcrit · f m.y.d kc.z · f c.0.d
equation (6.35))
As all relationships are less than unity, the 90 mm by 200 mm LVL member will meet
the ULS requirements of EC5.
125 mm
y
z z 63 mm
y
Fig. E5.7.5. Section of member.
1. Geometric properties
Thickness of the member, t t = 63 mm
Width of the member, h h = 125 mm
Cross-sectional area of the member, A A =t ·h A = 7.88 × 103 mm2
P1: PAB/RPW P2: PAB
BLUK117-Porteous October 6, 2007 19:24
t · h3
Second moment of area about the y–y Iy = I y = 1.03 × 107 mm4
axes, I y 12
2I y
Section modulus about the y–y axes, W y Wy = W y = 1.64 × 105 mm3
h
h · t3
Second moment of area about z–z axis, Iz Iz = Iz = 2.6 × 106 mm4
12
2Iz
Section modulus about the z–z axes, Wz Wz = Wz = 8.27 × 104 mm3
t
2. Timber properties
Table 1.3, strength class C24 (BS EN 338:2003(E), Table 1)
Characteristic tensile strength parallel to f t.0.k = 14 N/mm2
the grain, f t.0.k
Characteristic bending strength about the f m.y.k = 24 N/mm2
y–y axis, f m.y.k
Characteristic bending strength about the f m.z.k = 24 N/mm2
z–z axis, f m.z.k
3. Partial safety factors
Table 2.8 (UKNA to BS EN 1990:2002. Table NA.A1.2(B)) for the ULS
Permanent actions, γG γG = 1.35
Variable actions, γ Q γ Q = 1.5
Table 2.6 (UKNA to EC5, Table NA.3)
Material factor for solid timber, γ M γM = 1.3
4. Actions
Characteristic permanent compressive G k = 1.0 kN
action, G k
Characteristic medium-term compressive Q k = 4.0 kN
variable action, Q k
Design tensile action for the critical load Nd = γG · G k + γ Q · Q k
combination, Nd
(Table 2.8, equation (c) using the Nd = 6.75 × 103 N
unfavourable condition variable action)
Characteristic moment due to the variable M Q.y.k = 1.0 kN m
action about the y–y axis, M Q.y.k
Design moment about the y–y axis due to M y.d = γ Q · M Q.y.k M y.d = 1.5 kN m
the variable actions, M y.d
Characteristic moment due to the variable M Q.z.k = 0.1 kN m
action about the z–z axis, M Q.z.k
P1: PAB/RPW P2: PAB
BLUK117-Porteous October 6, 2007 19:24
Relationships less than unity; therefore the 63 mm by 125 mm sawn section in strength class
C24 will meet the ULS requirements of EC5.
Example 5.7.6 The stud wall shown in Figure E5.7.6 has an overall height of 3.75 m and
the studs are spaced at 600 mm centre to centre with braced battens at mid-height. Sawn
timber of 44 mm by 100 mm is used for the studs and the header and sole plates are 50
mm by 100 mm sawn timber, all class C16 to BS EN 338:2003. The wall functions in service
class 2 conditions and supports a characteristic permanent action of 0.6 kN (inclusive of the
panel self-weight) and a characteristic variable long-term action of 2.4 kN per stud. There
is wall sheathing on both faces and the fixings provide lateral support to the studs about the
z–z axis.
Check that the wall will meet the ULS requirements of EC5.
1. Geometric properties
Stud length, L L = 3.75 m
Effective length of a stud buckling about L e.y = 1.0 · L i.e. L e.y = 3.75 m
the y–y axis, L e.y (Table 5.2)
P1: PAB/RPW P2: PAB
BLUK117-Porteous October 6, 2007 19:24
z studs
1.875 m
y y
600 mm 600 mm
z z
3.75 m
100 mm
batten
1.875 m
y y
z
44 mm
Section through a stud Section through stud wall
Fig. E5.7.6.
Iy
Radius of gyration of a stud about the iy = i y = 28.87 mm
y–y axis, i y A
L e.y
Slenderness ratio of a stud about the λy = λ y = 129.9
y–y axis, λ y iy
Factor k y k y = 0.5 · 1 + βc · (λrel.y − 0.3) + λ2rel.y
(equation (5.5a); EC5, k y = 3.39
equation (6.27))
1
Instability factor about the kc.y = kc.y = 0.17
y–y axis (equation (5.4a); EC5, ky + ky2 − λ2rel.y
equation (6.25))
σc.0.d
Strength condition (equation 5.12) = 0.58
kc.y · f c.0.d
The relationship is less than unity; therefore the 44 mm by 100 mm studs, strength class
C16, will meet the ULS compression strength requirement of EC5.
7. Bearing strength of sole plates
Design bearing load at the base of Nd = 4.41 × 103 N
a stud, Nd
Nd
Design bearing stress on the sole σc.90.d = σc.90.d = 1 N/mm2
plate, σc,90,d – assume no spread of A b
Example 5.7.7 A stud wall in a domestic property, of the same layout as shown in
Figure E5.7.6, has an overall height of 3.75 m. The studs are spaced at 600 mm centre to
centre and braced battens are at mid-height. The studs, header and sole plates are 38 mm by 125
mm section, all strength class C18 to BS EN 338:2003. The wall functions in service class 2
conditions and each stud supports a characteristic vertical permanent action of 0.5 kN, a charac-
teristic vertical variable medium-term action of 2.0 kN and a characteristic lateral wind action
of 0.75 kN/m2 . Sheathing material is fixed on both faces but does not provide full buckling
restraint about the z–z axis of the studs.
Check that the member will meet the ULS requirements of EC5.
1. Geometric properties
Stud length, L L = 3.75 m
Effective length of a stud buckling L e.y = 1.0 · L L e.y = 3.75 m
about the y–y axis, L e.y (Table 5.2)
Effective length of a stud buckling L e.z = 0.5 · L L e.z = 1.88 m
about the z–z axis, L e.z (Table 5.2)
P1: PAB/RPW P2: PAB
BLUK117-Porteous October 6, 2007 19:24
Iy
Radius of gyration of a stud about iy = i y = 36.08 mm
the y–y axis, i y A
L e.y
Slenderness ratio of a stud about the y–y axis, λy = λ y = 103.92
λy iy
2I y
Section modulus of a stud about the y–y axes, Wy = W y = 9.9 × 104 mm3
Wy h
h · b3
Second moment of area of a stud about Iz = Iz = 5.72 × 105 mm4
the z–z axis, Iz 12
Iz
Radius of gyration of a stud about iz = i z = 10.97 mm
the z–z axis, i z A
L e.z
Slenderness ratio of a stud about the z–z axis, λz λz = λz = 170.93
iz
2. Timber strength properties
Table 1.3, strength class C18 (BS EN 338:2003(E), Table 1)
Characteristic compression strength parallel to f c.0.k = 18 N/mm2
the grain, f c.0.k
Characteristic bending strength, f m.y.k f m.y.k = 18 N/mm2
Characteristic compressive strength f c.90.k = 2.2 N/mm2
perpendicular to the grain, f c.90.k
Fifth-percentile modulus of elasticity parallel to E 0.05 = 6.0 kN/mm2
the grain, E 0.05
3. Partial safety factors
Table 2.8 (UKNA to BS EN 1990:2002, Table NA.A1.2(B)) for the ULS
Permanent actions, γG γG = 1.35
Variable actions, γ Q γ Q = 1.5
Table 2.2 (UKNA to EN 1990:2002(E), TableNA.A1.1)
Combination factor for a variable action, ψ0 ψ0 = 0.7
Combination factor for a wind action, ψ0.w ψ0.w = 0.5
P1: PAB/RPW P2: PAB
BLUK117-Porteous October 6, 2007 19:24
λz f c.0.k
Relative slenderness about the z–z λrel.z = · λrel.z = 2.98
axis, λrel.z π E 0.05
(equation (5.3); EC5, equation
(6.22))
As both relative slenderness ratios are greater than 0.3, conditions in 5.3.1 b) apply (EC5,
6.3.2(3)):
Redistribution factor for a km = 0.7
rectangular section, km
(see equation (4.4) (EC5, 6.1.6))
Factor βc for solid timber βc = 0.2
(equation (5.6); EC5, equation
(6.29))
Factor kz (equation (5.5b); EC5,
equation (6.28))
k z = 0.5 · 1 + βc · (λrel.z − 0.3) + λ2rel.z kz = 5.21
1
Instability factor about kc.z = kc.z = 0.1
the z–z axis, kc.z kz + kz2 − λ2rel.z
(equation 5.4b (EC5, equation
6.26))
Factor, k y
(equation (5.5a); EC5, equation
(6.27))
k y = 0.5 · 1 + βc · (λrel.y − 0.3) + λ2rel.y k y = 2.29
1
Instability factor about the y–y kc.y = kc.y = 0.2
axis, kc.y ky + k 2y − λ2rel.y
(equation (5.4a); EC5, equation
(6.25))
Moment condition
M2 y.d
Design bending stress about the σ 2m.y.d = σ 2m.y.d = 11.99 M/mm2
y–y axis due to permanent and Wy
combined medium-term vertical
and wind (dominant) action, σ 2y.d
L
Effective length of a stud, L ef.b : L ef.b = 0.9 · + 2 · h L ef.b = 1.94 m
With braced battens, the 2
distance between lateral
restraint = L/2. Due to udl
loading a factor of 0.9 has been
used (approximate solution)
and because loading is applied
at the compression edge, 2h has
been added.
(Table 4.2 (EC5, Table 6.1))
0.78 · b2
Critical bending stress, σm.crit σm.crit = · E 0.05 σm.cirt = 27.9 N/mm2
(equation (4.8); EC5, h · L ef.b
equation (6.32))
Lateral torsional buckling
condition (4.5.1.2 (EC5, 6.3.3)):
f m.y.k
Relative slenderness for λrel.m = λrel.m = 0.8
bending, λrel.m σm.crit
(equation (4.10); EC5,
equation (6.30))
1 if λrel.m ≤ 0.75
1.56 − 0.75 · λrel.m if 0.75 < λrel.m ≤ 1.4
Lateral stability factor, kcirt =
kcrit (Table 4.3 (EC5,
1
otherwise
equation (6.34))
λrel.m2
kcirt = 0.96
The critical condition is due to combined axial stress and bending about the y–y axis,
functioning as a beam and with wind as the dominant variable action. The studs are OK
as the combined compression and bending ratio is less than unity.
7. Bearing strength of the sole plates
For this condition, the greatest vertical load arises with the vertical variable load as the
only variable load case:
Design bearing load per stud, N3d = 3.67 × 103 N
N3d
N3d
Design bearing stress on the σc.90.d = σc.90.d = 0.77 N/mm2
plate, σc.0.d Ab
Example 5.7.8 A stud wall in a domestic property with the same layout as shown in
Figure E5.7.6 has an overall height of 2.4 m. The studs are spaced at 600 mm centre to
centre and battens are fitted at mid-height. Studs are 44 mm by 100 mm section, class C18
to BS EN 338:2003, and the wall functions in service class 2 conditions. Each wall stud
supports a characteristic permanent action of 0.4 kN, a characteristic medium-duration vari-
able action of 1.8 kN and a characteristic lateral wind action of 0.85 kN/m2 . Sheathing ma-
terial is fixed on both faces and provides full buckling restraint about the z–z axis of the
studs.
Determine the increase in the instantaneous lateral deflection of the wall at the
serviceability limit states (SLS) under the characteristic combination of actions, taking wind
loading as the dominant variable action.
1. Geometric properties
Stud length, L L = 2.4 m
Effective length of a stud for L e.y = 1.0 · L i.e. L e.y = 2.4 m
buckling about the y–y axis,
L e.y (Table 5.2)
Width of a stud, b b = 44 mm
Depth of a stud, h h = 100 mm
Lateral spacing of each stud, sstud = 600 mm
sstud
2. Timber strength properties
Table 1.3, strength class C18 (BS EN 338:2003(E), Table 1)
Fifth-percentile modulus of E 0.05 = 6.0 kN/mm2
elasticity parallel to the grain,
E 0.05
P1: PAB/RPW P2: PAB
BLUK117-Porteous October 6, 2007 19:24
Increase in the instantaneous value of the lateral deflection of the wall under the critical
characteristic combination of loading, δchar,instw
(equation (5.46))
1 G VLw
δchar.instw = · · δ0 + δinst.Gw δchar.instw = 7.54 mm
G VLw PE
1−
PE
The increase in the instantaneous lateral deflection of the wall at the SLS under the critical
characteristic combination of loading will be 7.54 mm.