During the review of BI-00168-0002 project’s weekly NCR summary report it was observed that there

was a NCR-M-009 related to high welding rejection rate issued on September 29, 2012 but the open
NCR-M-009 has not been submitted to SAPID per Schedule Q Para.7.5.3. It is a violation of Schedule Q
paragraph 7.5.3. Contractor shall submit the all open NCR to SAPID within 48 of issuance date with NCR
summary log.

During the weekly welding and welder rejection rate summary review in BI-00168-0002 it was observed
that the welder TRV-3 Vahit Karenfil has 0.38 weekly rejection rate in linear basis which exceeds the
maximum allowable rejection rate in linear basis of 0.25 per SAES-W 12 paragraph 8.2. It is violation per
SAES-W-12 paragraph 8.2. Contractor needs to take immediate action on this welder otherwise SAPLU
will revoke this welder from this project.

During the focused assessment of main line welding activities in BI-10-00168-0002, it was observed at
welding site that Joint no. 546-MLW-1421 and 1422 at 546Km were welded without the Pre-welding
inspection of Contractor QC Welding Inspector. As per SATIP-W-012 Item-3.7, Pre-welding and joint fit-
up Inspection is a HOLD point for Contractor QC. It is a violation of SATIP-W-012 Item-3.7. Contractor
shall take corrective action and justify the said issue

During the focused assessment of weld repair activities in BI-10-00168-0002, it was observed at Km 579
that contractor QC Inspector did not had AUT reports for unaccepted joints to mark the repair location
on the joints. The repair welding was performed on joint number 579-MLW-007 and after verification by
SAPID it was noted that marked and repaired area was not matching with AUT report for this particular
joint. The required location of defect starts from 251mm until 622mm as per AUT report no. 21, but
actually marked and repaired on two location from 251 to 622mm and 2585 to 2852mm. it is a violation
of contractor special process procedure RHM-SP-003 rev. 00 Para-9. Note This Surveillance was noted on
12 15 2012, refer to M-5 in LBE register.

During the focused assessment of welding and NDT activities in BI-10-00168-0002, it was observed at
Km 511 that inter-pas temperature is below the minimum specified pre-heat temperature during
welding of mainline pipe due to increased time laps between one welding stations to another. And, NDT
AUT was carried out on many joints without the post weld visual inspection by welding inspector caused
by insufficient inspection coverage for welding activities. The inter-pass temperature was failed to meet
the requirements on Joint no. 511-MLW-2974, 2975, 2976. And AUT was carried out without visual
inspection on Joint no. 511-MLW-2969 to 2978. It is a violation of approved WPS no. WPS-RHM-001-12
Rev.2, and SATIP-W-012 Item-3.9 respectively.

During the focus assessment in BI-10-00168-0002 project, found that the contractor has started the
Structural Fabrication and welding at Ain-nakhil Fabrication shop without issuing the Material Receiving
RFI to the responsible mechanical SAPID and also the material has already been cut and welded in large
quantity. This is the violation against SATIP-M-001-01 Item-2.0 and Sch. Q. Hence, the Contractor has
advised to issue the material receiving RFIs to Mechanical inspector for each material related to
Mechanical Fabrication. If continue the same practice, SAPID will initiate the action against the
contractor’s responsible QA and QC Personnel.

During the site visit in BI-10-00168-0002 project it was observed at Km 605.220, that a piece of pipe has
been cut from the original length of pipe no. 13421 for the purpose of tie-in welding of main line but the
material identification markings has not been transferred to cut piece for traceability. It is violation
against SAES-L-450 Para-8.8. Contractor shall ensure that when a length of pipe is cut from a longer joint
of pipe, all vendor markings and other identifying information shall be transferred to each length of
pipe. Contractor shall take necessary action to comply with standards.

During the visit in BI-10-00168-0002 project, it was observed in RHM Fabrication shop Ain-nakhil that
fabrication and welding of structural steel was going on without RFI and without Inspection coverage
from the contractor side on 03-01-2013 Friday. No electrode issuance and handling record was made. It
is a violation of Schedule Q Para-1.2.3, table VI-2 and Contractor QC procedure for welding consumable
control FQCP-M-004. Contractor shall comply with the company standards and quality procedure.

During the routine site visit in BI-10-00168-0002 project, it was observed at Km 459 that twelve “12”
joints joint no. 459-MLW-5242 to 459-5253 were welded without contractor QC pre-welding inspection.
Also, no pre-heating for these joints was maintained. This activity is a HOLD point for contractor QC
Inspector as per SATIP-W-012-01. It is violation against SATIP-W-012-01, Approved WPS RHM-001-12
and Table VI-2 of Attachment VI in Schedule-Q. It is a repeated violation and will be escalated to SANCR
as per SAEP-381 if no proper corrective and preventive actions taken. Contractor shall investigate the
matter and take necessary action to fulfill the quality requirements.

During the focus assessment in BI-10-00168-0002 project, it was observed at Km 611 that the calibration
validity of two SMAW welding machines tag no. RHM-1146 and RHM-1280H has been expired on 3-8-
2013 and these machines are still in use without re-calibrating. SAPID has already advised the contractor
in proactive notification-2366 to ensure the in time re-calibration of all welding equipment but no action
was taken. This is violation against Schedule-Q para-5 of attachment VI. Contractor shall take necessary
corrective and preventive action to comply with the standards. All welding equipment must be
calibrated at specified frequency.

During the focus assessment in BI-10-00168-0002 project, it was observed at Km 454 that, no contractor
QC Inspector was available at site and six 6 joints 454-MLW-5440 to 5445 were welded without pre-
welding Inspection, no proper pre-heating and cleaning was performed. Also, AUT was performed
without post weld visual inspection on joint no. 454-MLW-5437, 5438 and SAPID observed open to
surface incomplete fusion defects on both joints. As per SATIP-W-012-01 pre-welding and post welding
inspection is a HOLD point for contractor QC inspector. This is violation against Schedule Q table VI-2,
SAES-W-012 Para-10.3 and SATIP-W-012-01 item-3.7, 3.9. Contractor shall investigate and take
necessary corrective and preventive actions to comply the Quality requirements.

During the focus assessment in BI-10-00168-0002 project, it was observed at Km 620 that a new welding
machine has been used for the welding of joint no. 620-MLW-27011 String-10, without any calibration
or validation. There is no identification number or serial number assigned to welding machine for
traceability. It is violation against SAES-W-012 Para-18.2, SATIP-W-012-01 Item-2.2 and Schedule-Q para-
5 of attachment VI. Contractor shall take necessary corrective and preventive actions to comply with the
standards. All welding equipment must be calibrated at specified frequency.

During the site visit in BI-10-00168-0002 project it was observed at Km 623 that, there was no record of
welding electrodes which has been placed in storage oven. The storage oven temperature was not
meeting the requirements of SAES-W-012 Appendix 1. The welding of joint no. 622-MLW-27115 was
performed without proper conditioning of the welding electrodes. Contractor has to maintain the
records for welding consumables to ensure proper storage and conditioning. It is a violation against
SAES-W-012 and Contractor welding consumables control procedure RHM-FQCP-M-004. Contractor
shall take necessary corrective action to ensure the quality of the weld joints.

During the site visit in BI-10-00168-0002 project it was observed at Km 623 that, there was no record of
welding electrodes which has been placed in storage oven. The storage oven temperature was not
meeting the requirements of SAES-W-012 Appendix 1. The welding of joint no. 622-MLW-27115 was
performed without proper conditioning of the welding electrodes. Contractor has to maintain the
records for welding consumables to ensure proper storage and conditioning. It is a violation against
SAES-W-012 and Contractor welding consumables control procedure RHM-FQCP-M-004. Contractor
shall take necessary corrective action to ensure the quality of the weld joints.

During the site visit in BI-10-00168-0002 project it was observed at Km 623 that, there was no record of
welding electrodes which has been placed in storage oven. The storage oven temperature was not
meeting the requirements of SAES-W-012 Appendix 1. The welding of joint no. 622-MLW-27115 was
performed without proper conditioning of the welding electrodes. Contractor has to maintain the
records for welding consumables to ensure proper storage and conditioning. It is a violation against
SAES-W-012 and Contractor welding consumables control procedure RHM-FQCP-M-004. Contractor
shall take necessary corrective action to ensure the quality of the weld joints.

During the focus assessment on implementation of Quality procedures in BI-10-00168-002 project it was
observed that contractor is not properly implementing the requirements of Welding Consumable
Control procedure ‘RHM-FQCP-M-004 Rev.5’. As per the para 6.4.1 of the said procedure, contractor
shall use Consumable Requisition Form ‘RHM-QF-M-004-01’ for issuance of welding consumables with
the approval of authorized personnel. It is a violation against RHM-FQCP-M-004 Rev.5. Contractor shall
comply with procedure requirements and ensure proper implementation on all job sites.

During the focus assessment on tie-in welding activities in BI-00168-0002 project it was observed at Km
540 that, the clamp meter-W0332438 cert. no. 650981 used to check the welding parameters was
expired on 12 March, 2013 and it is still under the use of welding inspectors without re-calibration. It is a
violation against Schedule-Q Para-5 of Att. VI. Contractor shall identify, maintain, control, adjust and
calibrate all tools, gauges, instruments and other measuring and testing devices used for controlling
quality. Contractor shall take necessary action to comply with the standard.

During the monitoring of welding activities on 05 12 2013 SAPID observed that, Contractor RHM
responsible person did not remove properly rust from the pipe weld surface at least 25 mm prior to
GMAW. Welder Symbol TRM010, TR011 had completed the welding at KM- 270 MLW 13509. Contractor
RHM- QC welding Inspector Mr. Kumar failed to inspect cleanness of surface of the pipe prior to
welding. This is REPEATED VIOLATION against SAES-W-012 Para. 10.3.1. SATIP W-012-01 item 3.7.
Contractor RHM - QC Manager is responsible to take the corrective action and details report submit to
SAPID immediately. Further contractor fail to meet the Saudi Aramco requirement, SAPID will stopped
the production welding. Issued By PRASENJIT BISWAS SAPID Mobile 0501309114

During surveillance on 05 12 2013,SAPID found Auto UT is completed prior to visual Welding Inspection
at KM 270 MLW 13497 13499 by NDT Service provider, Company AMSYCO. Contractor RHM QC welding
inspector failed to Visual welding Inspection. This is REPEATED VIOLATION against SAES-W-012 Para.
10.6 SATIP W-012-01 item 3.9. and Doc. No. AMSYCO–500-8-101-1 Rev. 06 Para 6.0. All welds shall be
visual inspected prior to NDT and Visual inspection shall be carried out over 125 mm prior to AUT
inspection. Contractor RHM - QC Manager is responsible to take the corrective action and details report
submit to SAPID immediately. Further contractor fail to meet the Saudi Aramco requirement, SAPID will
stopped the AUT. Issued By PRASENJIT BISWAS SAPID Mobile 0501309114

While performing the in-process inspection of tie-in welding activities in BI-00168-0002 project it was
observed during the welding of joint no. 545-MLW-1467 that, a lifting belts has been used to protect the
adjacent coating of the weld. Due to high temperature of welding the belt was melted over the weld
area. It was noted that the welding was continued without removing these impurities and it can lead to
cracks or other inclusion defects in the weld joint. As per SAES-W-012 Para-10.3.1 the weld and adjacent
25mm area shall be free from any foreign materials. It is a violation against SAES-W-012 Para-10.3.1.
Contractor shall take immediate action to fulfill the quality requirements.

During surveillance on 05 18 2013, SAPID randomly inspected and found surface irregularities, spatters,
undercut, uneven welding profiles, and poor workmanship. This discontinuities Accepted by RHM QC
Welding Inspector KM 265, Joint numbers are MLW 13678 to 13681 and followed by AUT. This is
Violation as per SAES-W-012, Para 10.10 clearly indicated Arc Strike, other indications of careless
workmanship, uneven weld profile, shall be removed by grinding. This is repeated violation, RHM QC
welding Inspector Mr. James Angles failed to inspect and meet the requirement of SAES. Contractor
RHM – QA QC Manager is responsible to take immediate action and details report submit to SAPID.
Issued By PRASENJIT BISWAS SAPID Mobile 0501309114

BI-10-00168,6 3 2013 During surviellance, welding of joint 556-MLW-1024 ,Welders w-4236 w-4379
used excessive current to weld CAPPING and found undercuts throughout the joint, welding inspector
Mr.Anoopnath failed to check the parameter current as per Approved WPS. As per Approved WPS RHM-
003-12 CAPPING to be welded by with in the current range of 88-94 Amps and the welders w-4236 w-
4379 used 123 130 Amps

During the focus assessment on weekly welder repair rates in BI-00168-0002 project, SAPLU has
observed that the weekly, week-29 repair rates of Welder Sinan Sokmen TRS-6 and Edhan Yildrim TRE-1
are 0.78 and 0.82 respectively and these repair rates are exceeded the maximum acceptable weekly
welder rejection rate 0.35 linear basis. This is violation against SAES-W-012 Para-8.2 and no action was
taken by the contractor QC team to notify and control the welding repair. Hence SAPLU has issued
standard violations and remind to revoke their JCCs, if their performance will not be improved in the
upcoming week production. Contractor shall take necessary action to achieve the Quality of the welds.

BI-00168, 07 28 2013, During the Surveillance at KM-408 and 409 Pipe-String no. 219 and 220, it was
observed that Weld joint identifications such as Weld joint number, Welder symbol, Date of Welding
was not visible on the welded joints. It is violation against SAES-W-012 Para-15.1. All weld joints shall be
marked for identification and these identifications shall be made with a suitable weather-proof marking
material. Contractor shall take immediate action to comply with the standard requirements.
Observation by Mr. Senthil Kumar.

During the focus assessment on NDT results and joint identification numbering of main line welding in
BI-00168-0002 project, it has been observed that the joint no. 005-MLW-24555-A has been assigned
twice to different welds i.e. once for automatic welding and once for manual welding as per AUT report-
408 and RT report-044. It is violation against SAEP-1160 Para-6.2. Weld numbering shall be consecutive
in the direction of flow per line. Each weld shall be identified by joint number, line number, and spool
number. Contractor shall take necessary action to comply with the company standard to enhance the
proper weld tracking system and good records.

During the routine inspection of tie-in welding activities in BI-00168-0002 Project, it was observed at Km
502 that the two welders’ welder symbol-HHC and AKH started the welding of Temperature Tie-in weld
no. 502-MLW-3347 without proper fit-up inspection and acceptance by Contractor QC inspector. Also,
pre-heating was not carried out prior to welding. It is a violation against SATIP-W-012-01 Item-3.7 show
the HOLD point for contractor QC Inspector and the Approved WPS-RHM-003-12 which indicates 95
degree C temperature minimum for pre-heating the welds. Contractor shall take necessary action to
comply with quality requirements.

During the focus assessment on NDT reports in BI-00168-0002 Project it has been observed that the
Welding QC Inspector Mr. S. Muruganadam is signing on the Radiography Film Assessment Reports
RHM-RT-036 to 063 instead of service provider RTFI. As per SAEP-1142 Para-7.2 personnel performing or
evaluating NDT results shall be certified in the NDT method or specialized technique being used. It is a
violation as per the said standard. Contractor shall investigate the matter and take some corrective
action to fulfill the standard requirements by good record keeping.

BI-10-00168,TWLAS. During document review SAPID noted that contractor raised RFI for Girth weld
coating holiday inspection and Final Holiday inspection which is not included in TWO WEEK LOOK AHEAD
SCHEDULE and it is HOLD POINT inspection for SAPID, Tie-in welding stated in CIVIL activities instead of
Mechanical activity. It is a standard violation as per SCHEDULE-Q Atta-IV Para-1.5.All planned quality
activities shall be clearly stated in the TWLAS.

During the focus assessment on mainline welding and documentation at Km-142 of BI-10-00168-0002
project it has been observed that the contractor QC does not have the revised WPS for the re-qualified
filler wire lot number 995F. Contractor is still using the old WPS no. RHM-001-12 rev.2 where the filler
wire is still old 1035K . It is a violation against SAES-W-012 Para-7.1.6. Contractor shall make available
the latest revisions of approved documents at site for review and verification.This focus assessment by
SAPLU Mr.Faisal Hanif

During the focus assessment on mainline welding and documentation at Km-142 of BI-10-00168-0002
project it has been observed that the contractor QC does not have the revised WPS for the re-qualified
filler wire lot number 995F. Contractor is still using the old WPS no. RHM-001-12 rev.2 where the filler
wire is still old 1035K . It is a violation against SAES-W-012 Para-7.1.6. Contractor shall make available
the latest revisions of approved documents at site for review and verification.This focus assessment by
SAPLU Mr.Faisal Hanif

During routine site visit in Shybah NGL P L at KM-323 on 14 Dec 2013,SAPLU had observed that
Contractor Welder Mr.Ajaykumar with JCC log 31A proceeding weld repair rectification of joint number
323-MLW-11436 without PRESENCE OF WELDING INSPECTOR ,NDE inspection, RFI, WPS, Consumable
control log, Document traceability for the repair, Work permit for the activity and also found the
Electrode Holding oven temperature less than 90 778 C, Moreover the activity is critical and HOLD
POINT for the contractor welding inspector, It violates the following SA requirements SAES-W-012 Para
7.1.6,17.3 SATIP-W-012 item 3.12,RHM-SP-W-003 Rev-01 and API 1104 Para 10.5,10.6,The violation
observed by SAPLU Mr.Balamurali.

During the focus assessment on in-process welding activities it was observed at joint 382-MLW-8876
CRW, that the coated pipe adjacent to the girth weld area was not wrapped by protective sleeves. This is
a violation of para 6.2.1 of SAES-H-200 which states that "Protective sleeves made from welding
blankets or similar nonflammable material at least 0.5 m wide shall be wrapped snugly around the
coated ends of the pipes adjacent to the girth weld area while field welding is taking place in order to
prevent weld spatter from burning through the coating. The sleeves shall be held in place by straps or
other mechanical means to ensure a snug fit all around the circumference of the pipe. "Contractor QC is
hereby advised to be alert to monitor the implementation of company standards at site. Observation by
Vivek.

During the surveillance in Fab Shop Qadaddiyah of BI-10-00168-0002 project, it has been observed that
one welder Mr. Sujat Khan Welder symbol-103522 JCC-65 was welding on 2inch joints with SMAW
process, but his qualification records and JCC shows the qualification only for GTAW process. Hence the
welder is not qualified for the SMAW process it is a violation against SAES-W-012 Para-8, 10.9.1, SAEP-
324 and ASME-IX QW-351. SAPID have concern about the performance of Welding QC Inspector
assigned in the Fab shop. Contractor shall take immediate action to comply with the quality
requirements and investigate the matter. By M. Faisal Hanif

During SAPID focus assessment at contractor material store, Found that some Welding filler wire ER70S-
2 released at site by contractor inspector issue date 11-Aug-2014 prior to RFI without receiving
inspection.RFI was generated 11 Aug number 18032 and inspection schedule date 12-Aug-2014 . It is
violation of Schedule Q para-1.2.3.Contractor take action on this matter and comply the standard
requiremnets.Observation by Muhammad Yousaf SAPID Mech

During SAPID focus assessment,found the SHBABNGL-1P L at km.594 that weldolet to pipe joint WB07
and WB16 BB-77712 SHT-001 Rev.0F1 welding completed but root fusion have not been achieved
properly. It is violation of SAES-W-12 para.16.8.1.Contractor submit the corrective and preventive action
and comply the standard requirements. Observation by Muhammad Yousaf SAPID Mech

During Focus assessment and surveillance inspection at KM 241,string 341 , located field weld of MLW-
14741, SAPID was noticed that Wasim Al Khaleeb, RHM sub contractor was not using wind shield
protection for the welding activities . This was violates S.Aramco standard SAES -W-12 ,para 10.2 ,
welding environment and it was stated that Wind shields or tents shall be required when the wind is
strong enough to affect arc stability or shielding gas coverage and contamination from the environment
, such as wind blown sand , shall be prevented by the use of adequate shielding . For avoding such
incident , SAPID advise for contractor welding inspector to follow strictly S.Aramco quality rules for the
production of sound weld joint. . By . P.Y.PUNNOOSE, Badge 7158457.

A focused assessment has been made to the on-going activity-PRE WELDING AND FIT-UP FOR NORMAL
TIE-IN JOINT 378-MLW-9012 at KM-378, SA Inspection Checklist SAIC-W-2048 has been utilized during
the assessment. As a result, it has been observed that the pipe to be welded has no material
identification such as stenciling of HEAT NUMBER, PIPE NUMBER AND PIECE NUMBER on both inside
and outside. This violates SAIC-W-2048 Item A3. Contractor shall take immediate action to comply the
standard requirement. Observation made by Sameer Nediyedath.

During focus assessment and surveillance inspection at KM -211 , scraper area , SAPID was noticed that
contractor is not do good preservation of flange face and it will cause damge of flange hub and will lead
failure of gas ket and valve installation . This was violate 02 -SAMSS-11, it was stated that all flanges shall
be protected from mechanical damage , welding end and sealing faces shall be protected with suitable
wood or plastic or metal covers. So SAPID advised to contractor for to do well protction of flange face
because flange hub is the focal point for preventing fluid and gas leakage . By . P.Y.PUNNOOSE, Badge
7158457.

During site visit SAPID noticed in KM 478 valve station of segment 1 main pipeline under BI JO 10-00168-
0002 of 36 8221 SHBABNGL pipeline project on March 19, 2015 that 16 inch Dia. X 7.92 mm WT pipe
welding started for BD line but material receiving inspection not yet completed and no welding RFI
raised 24 hrs before and hard RFI not available at site. So SAPID is advising the contractor to raise the RFI
for welding on time and clear the material with related documents as per Schedule Q, attachment III
para 3.24 and pipe laying. This mater already informed to SAPMT. This observation done by Arun Singha.

During the routine Site visit on May 05-2015 in BI-10-00168 RHM Qaddadiyah yard, SAPID observed that
the ongoing welding for structural platform platform no 902,drawing BB-777815-001 has performed by
non-qualified welder. This is clearly violating the requirements of 12-SAMSS-007 Para-7.5 and SAIC-M-
2012, the welders shall be qualified in accordance with the requirements of AWS D1.1 D1 and welder
shall have the valid JCCs, Contractor shall take necessary action to comply the standard requirement.

PID noticed that Welding of Golden joint has been performed at Km-09 without approval of NDT lieu of
hydro test from senior operations representative. As per SAES-A-004 Sec.6, NDT lieu of hydro test shall
be approved by senior operations representative for new facilities under construction in projects. So
contractor shall take necessary action to comply the standard requirements

During the site visit in Shaybah NGL Pipeline project BI-00168-0002 Contractor has done the Welding of
Golden Joint at Km-399 valve station without RFI also the Contractor QC was not aware of this activity.
As per the Schedule Q, Attachment-IV, Para 1.2.3 Notification requirements for RFI shall be a minimum
24 hours for site work and 48 hours for weekend inspections. and as per Schedule-Q, Attachment-VI,
Para 2.1. Contractor shall assign the approved quality personal to the work in accordance with table VI-
2. SAPID is advice the contractor to take necessary action on this issue. Observation by Harish Palisetti.

PID noticed that contractor MMS has been performed the Welding of 4 inch blow down pipes at Km-633
on 02 and 03-July-2015 without inspection coverage of welding QC inspector especially when contractor
inspection level of welding is hold point, and RFI also not initiated for this activities. This violates the
Schedule Q Attach.IV para-1.2.3 and Attach.VI para 2.1 requirements. So contractor shall take necessary
action to comply the standard requirements. Observation by Sameer Nediyedath

SAPID noticed that contractor MMS has been backfilled the blow down line BB-777678 002 at Km-633
without submitting the RT report for the weld joint FW26R1 and re-shoot has to be done on the
suspected joint as per Third party review response. As per Schedule Q attachment V section-Summary of
quality system deliverables, contractor has to submit the welding summary and NDE reports prior to
lowering. Hence contractor shall take necessary action for re-shoot the joint and repetition of activities
such as stopaq application, holiday test and backfilling. Observation by Sameer Nediyedath

During the routine inspection in BI-00168-0002 Shaybah NGL Pipeline project it has been observed at
km-267 during the 16 inch blow down line welding the Contractors approved welding QC Inspector is
not available at the job location. It is a violation against SATIP-W-012-01 ITEM No - 3.11, 3.12 and 3.14.
Item number 3.11 and 3.14 is hold point for the contractor welding QC inspector. Contractor shall take
immediate action to comply the SATIP requirement. Observation by SAPID M. Selva Kuma

During the routine site visit in Shaybah NGL Pipeline project BI-00168-0002 it was observed that, the
temporary solid plug used in the 3 4inch valve at km-357 was seal welded with the valve by the
contractor, due to the seal welding installation of ST-0075 from this valve is not possible. Which violates
the standard SAES-L-110 Para 9.3 and Drawing BB-777704 Sht-001. Contractor shall take immediate
action to comply the standard requirement. Observation by M. Selva Kumar