Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A350X vs B777X
Both Airbus and Boeing came up with their mini-jumbos to battle each other
in the lower segment of the (ultra-) long range market. Airbus came up with
the Airbus A350-1000, while Boeing came up with the Boeing 777X.
This article deals with the long range aircraft that carry 350 passengers (in
a 3-class configuration) . In order to make a good comparison, it is important
Page 1 of 7
The Battle Of The Jumbos
to see how the various airplanes are positioned in the range vs. payload
diagram:
With the coming launch of the 777-9 at the Dubai Air Show On November
2017, the battle between the A350-1000 and 777-9 will be officially on, with
two very different aircraft competing for the same market. While there is
discussion of another stretch to the A350 program to provide comparable
capacity to the larger 777-9, we can compare today’s aircraft and examine
their relative economics based on manufacturer projections and Piano
models based on preliminary specifications.
The A350-1000
The A350-1000 is the largest of 3 models in the A350 family, with 350 seats
in a typical three class configuration, with an 8,400 nautical mile range. The
A350 features carbon fiber composite structure and wings, and at 53%
composites will have slightly more of the aircraft made of this material than
the Boeing 787-9, which is 50% composites. It features new technology
Page 2 of 7
The Battle Of The Jumbos
Trent XWB engines from Rolls Royce with state-of-the art fuel efficiency,
advanced aerodynamics, and state of the art systems.
The 777-9X
The 777-9 is a stretched version of the current 777-300ER with a new engine
and new wing, along with other enhancements, to create an updated version
of the 777, which delivered its 1,000th example earlier this year. The 777-
9X will feature an aluminum alloy fuselage with a carbon fiber composite
wing, and new technology GE9X engines that are derived from the GE90
and GEnx families. The wingspan for the 777-9 will be longer than any
Boeing aircraft, and will include folding wingtips to enable the aircraft to
utilize current gate positions at airports, as otherwise the new model would
require gates typically used for A380 operations (which are currently quite
limited at congested airports.)
The following table compares the two aircraft on several key statistics,
based on preliminary data prior to the 777-9X launch:
The A350 cabin width is larger than the 787 and smaller than the 777X. The
result is that a typical configuration in economy would be 9 abreast at 17
inch seat width for the 787, 9 abreast at 18 inch seat width for the A350, and
10 abreast using 17 inch seat width for the 777. While the 777 is currently
offered in 9 and 10 abreast seating, recent orders have trended to 10 abreast
seating as airline seek to maximize seat-mile costs.
Page 3 of 7
The Battle Of The Jumbos
COMPARATIVE ECONOMICS
Currently, there are 195 orders for the A350-1000 and 810 orders for A350
aircraft as a whole, despite their already higher order number, Boeing
already responded to the A350-1000’s release, announcing their 777-X
program in 2013. Two of those aircraft will carry over 400 passengers,
approaching passenger numbers of their own 747 aircraft. Airbus has not
announced plans for anything that could bridge the gap between the capacity
of the A350-1000 and the A380, which is capable of seating 850 people in
an all-economy class configuration. Airbus’s CEO Fabrice Bregier told
USA Today that his company isn’t ready to push for another large aircraft,
saying, ““It’s much too early today, and I’m not convinced that there will
be a large market,” Bregier said. “We would look at the market and the
business case. And I can tell you we’re far away from that.”
Page 4 of 7
The Battle Of The Jumbos
which is just another example of how the manufacturers are looking to better
the customer experience.
A first comparison between A350-1000 and 777X concluded that when the
Airbus A350-1000 will enter service in 2017 it will probably be the most
efficient aircraft in the skies. Boeing's reply to the Airbus A350-1000 came
in the form of the Boeing 777X –that is the better and more efficient aircraft-
and Airbus does not seem to have an answer to that.
Page 5 of 7
The Battle Of The Jumbos
Order numbers also show that the Boeing 777X is favored over the Airbus
A350-1000; few airlines are buying the Boeing 777-8X (43 orders) that will
be the ultra-long range leader, but airlines are favoring the Boeing 777-
9X (243 orders) that has higher capacity over the Airbus A350-1000 (169
orders). The Airbus A350-1000 has not received any orders in a year now.
And since the launch of the Boeing 777X, Airbus only received 3 orders for
the Airbus A350-1000.
Page 6 of 7
The Battle Of The Jumbos
With very comparable seat-mile costs, the A350-1000 and 777-9X will be
competitive, and it will come down to how many seats an airline believes it
can fill. For those that can fill 400 seats, the 777-9 looks like a good
alternative, for those that prefer a lower risk, the 350 seat A350-1000 is
the right airplane.
The key question, as the OEMs continue to one up each other, is whether an
A350-1100 stretch will be built. The A350-1100 would be an all new
technology aircraft competing with a highly modified but derivative model,
and should have both lower aircraft mile costs and lower seat mile costs than
the 777-9. A stretched A350 would also help to bridge the large gap in size
between A350-1000 and A380-800.
The battle in the jumbo market could have an unexpected winner: The
Boeing 777-9X.
Page 7 of 7