You are on page 1of 3

Technological Institute of the Philippines

Quezon City

College of Engineering and Architecture


Electronics Engineering Program

DESIGN PROJECT REVISION AND COMMENTS


Project Title: Design of Solar Powered Wireless Charger
Faculty Adviser: Engr. Samuel P. Mabanta
Date: March 22, 2016

Project Team Members:


STUDENT NAME STUDENT NUMBER
1. Barquin, Edward
2. Sales, Alfred Allen
3. Sarmiento, John Calvin
4. Torres, Ronald D.C 1011523
5. Ubalde, Jay Carl S.

Revisions and Comments Action Made Panel


A. Executive Summary  It has been rephrase and
 See first sentence. Is this a phrase? edited.
B. Project Description and Goals  Design project goals and
 Focus on Wireless power transfer. It being description had focused
solar powered has no relevance to the only on wireless power
topic. transmission.
C. Technical Specification  It has been updated on the
 Verify all specs included in table 2. actual specs gathered. Engr. Malit
Distance/separation must be 0.3-1m.  Removed the less than sign.
D. Design Approach and details Add appropriate values
 Must be able to compute component align with the actual tech
values based on target specs. specs achieved.
E. Schedule, Tasks and Milestone  Revised the computation of
 Make it larger. Include schedule, tasks and the computations based on
milestone in thesis 1. target specs.
F. Results and Acceptance Testing  It was added the project
timeline used from thesis 1.
 Poor Simulations. Improve this and look Expounded and made it
for relevant tools. Poor actual testing. Must broader.
lead to specs validation.  Added relevant simulation
G. Budget and Cost analysis results from MATLAB and
 Show basis for pricing. LTSpice IV and used to
H. Project Summary elaborately show and lead
 Detail Methodology. Provide more all the data gathered into
convincing data to show spec validation. the desired outcome- tech
I. Bibliography/References spec.
 Lacking. Read more related papers.  Basis for components
pricing was in the
appendices. It was fixed and
cited the source correctly.
 Interpretation of the
graphical data had been
elaborately explained.
Compared the actual and
simulated results to show
the relativity of the data
results.
 All the references that had
been used were added and
cited correctly.
A. Executive Summary  Revised and already been
 Revise. Align to the current output. align to the current specs.
B. Project Description and Goals  Removed unnecessary data
 Align to the new specs. and aligned to current
C. Technical Specification output specs.
 Align to the new Specs.  Assumption of values had
D. Design Approach and details been determined and
 Specify the reason for assumption values. thoroughly explained with
Clarify the reason for the models used. various mathematical
E. Results and Acceptance Testing equations and principles
 Show the relationship (curve plot) of the used.
efficiency with the parameters. (i.e  Curve plot for every
distance, coil diameter, power, error, loss). simulated and actual testing Engr. Martinez
I. Bibliography/References results had been plotted
 Cite every assumptions or claims. and interpreted.
General Suggestions:  Some parameters added
 Revise the paper in alignment to current such as coupling factor and
specs. Document was not updated. mutual inductance
Identify the reason for the incorrect output computation to viably relate
(<0.3m). Defend, atleast, why it cannot the actual data into
reach up to 1m. theoretical basis.
 Cited all the assumptions
using appropriate citations.
 Revised and aligned the
whole papers in the current
specs.
 Already been address why
the prototype had not
achieved 1m distance that
was discussed on the
summary and conclusions.
A. Executive Summary  Revised the whole
 Revise content of whole documents. Align documents that aligned to
content to specs and prototype. the new specs.
B. Project Description and Goals  Prototype has been working
 Not working prototype. Revision of but not achieved other
prototype. parameter and it was Engr. Alfonso
explained in the papers the
factors.
 Provided a working
simulation to show viable
data that was not met in the
actual.

You might also like