Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2017
Reasons for Low Tax GDP Rate in Pakistan
Saghir Ahmed Khan
Submitted By:-
Hammad Jabbar (18811)
Adil Qureshi (19780)
Aneesh Kumar (19056)
Ahmed Faraz (16097)
Introduction
In Pakistan, tax collection as a percentage of gross domestic product (GDP) is
considerably low when compared to similar economies. The ratio is low for both
direct and indirect taxes. In 2012-13, tax-GDP ratio for direct and indirect taxes
collected by the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) was 3.2pc and 5.3pc,
respectively. Overall the ratio was 8.5pc.
There are numerous reasons for low tax-GDP ratio in the country. Some of them
are discussed hereunder:
1. Tax Evasion
The extent of tax evasion in Pakistan could be estimated by looking at the tax gap.
The operational definition of the tax gap is the difference between potential and
actual tax revenue, where the potential tax revenue is the amount of tax the
government would collect if every person liable to pay tax fully pays his due tax
and complies with tax law. There is an enormous revenue loss due to exemptions,
allowances and deductions from income tax, sales tax and customs duty, which
was Rs. 887.5 billion or equal to 3.9pc of GDP in fiscal year 2012-13.
Generally, the tax incentives (exemptions) are provided to the investors to boost
economic growth and create jobs. But, slow GDP expansion over the last five years
or so has demonstrated the ineffectiveness of tax incentives in accelerating the
pace of growth.
Likewise, the tax amnesty schemes, introduced from time to time, frustrate the
FBR’s efforts to curb tax evasion. These schemes adversely affect documentation,
distort uniform collection of taxes and ensure horizontal and vertical equity,
violating the two golden principles of good taxation.
Such schemes widen tax policy gap as they raise expectations of taxpayers for
more such packages in the future. Furthermore, as the amnesties provide immunity
from tax audit, they further hinder the process of tax compliance. There are more
than one form of tax evasion such as none or under-reporting of tax liability.
Inadequate staff, scarcity of physical and financial resources and/or poor working
capacity of the tax officials may result in weak enforcement. And tax-evaders
exploit weaknesses in the enforcement mechanism to their benefit.
In order to improve revenue performance, it is necessary to bridge the tax policy
gap as well as tax gap arising from weak enforcement. Minimal use of exemptions
is needed to refine the existing taxes and to provide level playing field for all
sectors of economy. At the same time, it is crucial to strengthen the current
enforcement mechanism by enhancing administrative efficiency and capability as
well as improving taxpayer compliance through taxpayer services and education.
Last but not least, it is imperative to impose stipulated penalties on taxpayers who
violate provisions of law. At the same time, strengthening the tax investigation
system is fundamental in creating deterrence against tax evasion and bridging the
tax gap.
The taxpayers exploit the multiple sales tax regimes to evade taxes through
fraudulent schemes. VAT/GST fraud is a matter of serious concern for the tax
administration of both developing and developed countries and Pakistan, too, is no
exception to that. It’s an issue of growing concern that has put a question mark on
the superiority of VAT over other forms of consumption taxes such as retail sales
tax.
The issue of sales tax fraud in terms of size and frequency is a matter of grave
concern for the tax authorities in Pakistan. GST fraud exists in a number of forms,
some prominent of them are:
In some cases, the businesses got sales tax registration by submitting documents of
employees. Under such circumstances, the actual beneficiaries of refunds or input
tax adjustments remained underground. Whenever records of such dummy units
are subjected to examination, tax demand so created could not be collected as the
amount is assessed against the poor employees rather than rich, real owner of the
business.
There are cases wherein invoices were being issued on the strength of fake /non-
verifiable import of goods declaration (GDs) in the sales tax returns. Thus the
whole amount of input tax adjusted by the buyers proved to be illegal and
recoverable. In fact, goods were being supplied to unregistered persons and
invoices generated on the strength of fake GDs were being utilized for input tax
adjustment.
c. Flying invoices
It is found in certain cases that the registered persons supply taxable goods to
unregistered persons but succeed to obtain invoices from registered units involved
in supply of different goods. These flying invoices are being used extensively to
claim input tax or sales tax refunds.
d. Fake bank accounts
The registered persons claiming input tax on invoices more than Rs. 50,000 are
required to make payments through banking channels. The tax fraudsters opened
bank accounts sometimes in connivance with the bank officials utilizing
documents/signatures of persons other than actual beneficiaries and this enables
buyers to ensure compliance of section 73 of the Sales Tax Act 1990.
Sales tax is an indirect tax. The businesses are supposed to shift the burden of this
tax to final consumers of goods and services. In many cases, the registered persons,
though charge sales tax on all supplies, they don’t declare true turnover in the sales
tax returns and thus evade sales tax. In other cases, many businesses declare
turnover just below threshold required for sales tax registration and thus continue
to operate in an undocumented economy. These businesses actually capture large
share of market due to less product prices as compared to those operating under the
sales tax net.