Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2, JUNE 2013
Abstract—Power generation systems (PGSs) based on hybrid vr Wind speed measured at the reference
renewable energy are one of the promising solutions for future height Hr .
distributed generation systems. Among different configurations, ξ Wind speed power law coefficient.
hybrid photovoltaic-wind turbine (PV-WT) grid connected PGSs
are the most adopted for their good performance. However, due to PW T.m ax Maximum available output WT power.
the complexity of the system, the optimal balance between these two PW T.out Actual output WT power.
energy sources requires particular attention to achieve a good engi- vci , vra , vco Cut in, rated, cut out wind speeds.
neering solution. This paper deals with the optimal sizing of PV-WT ρ, A Air density, swept area of the rotor.
by adopting different multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) op- Cp Efficiency of the wind turbine.
timization approaches. Sensitivity of MCDA algorithms has been
analyzed, by considering different weighting criteria techniques ηW TInv ., ηM ech Inverter efficiency, mechanical compo-
with different fluctuation scenarios of wind speed and solar radi- nents efficiency.
ation profiles, thus highlighting advantages and drawbacks of the α, β, γ Coefficients approximating the genera-
proposed optimal sizing approaches. The following study could be tor emission characteristic.
assumed as a powerful roadmap for decision makers, analysts, and Iint Initial investment.
policy makers.
P VC , W TC Investment costs of 1-kW PV, WT in-
Index Terms—Design optimization, hybrid power systems, mul- stalled power.
ticriteria decision analysis, photovoltaic systems, wind generation SVPV P , SVW T P , Salvage present values of PV, WT, and
systems.
SVPGS P PSG.
OMPV P , OMW T P , Operation and maintenance costs pres-
OMPGS P ent value related to PV, WT, and PGS.
NOMENCLATURE
Cgrid Cost of the required grid energy.
VOC , ISC Open-circuit voltage and short-circuit P VP PV installed power.
current. P VSV PV salvage value for each kW.
FF Fill factor. P VOM PV operation and maintenance costs for
NPV PV modules number. each kW.
ηPVinv . PV system inverter efficiency. W TP WT installed power.
TA Ambient temperature. W TSV WT salvage value for each kW.
NOCT Nominal operating cell temperature. W TOM WT operation and maintenance costs
ISC.STC Short-circuit current measured under for each kW.
standard test conditions. β, γ, Ψ Inflation rate, interest rate, escalation
VOC.STC Open-circuit voltage measured under rate.
standard test conditions. NPV , NW T , NP Lifespan for PV, WT, and PGS project.
KI Short-circuit current coefficient. wjs Subjective criteria weight.
KV Open-circuit voltage coefficient. k Criteria final score.
Tref PV panel temperature of 25 ◦ C at refer-
ence operating conditions. I. INTRODUCTION
v Wind speed at the height HW T .
ONSIDERING sustainable energy development chal-
C lenges, hybrid renewable energy (HRE) is believed to
be of high importance in the future power generation systems
(PGSs). Despite technical and economic ongoing work, HRE
Manuscript received August 28, 2012; revised December 6, 2012; accepted
January 13, 2013. Date of publication March 14, 2013; date of current version
PGSs have already proven environmental and social benefits
May 15, 2013. Paper no. TEC-00420-2012. recognized worldwide.
The authors are with the Department of Electrical, Electronics Engineering, Among several alternatives, grid connected hybrid
and Computer Science, University of Catania, Catania 6-95125, Italy (e-mail:
muhd_alsayed@diees.unict.it; mario.cacciato@dieei.unict.it; gscarcella@
photovoltaic-wind turbine (PV-WT) PGSs show high poten-
diees.unict.it; gscelba@diees.unict.it). tial, limiting the power output fluctuations of single source PGS
Color versions of one or more of the figures in this paper are available online contribution. Optimal design of these systems needs careful at-
at http://ieeexplore.ieee.org.
Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/TEC.2013.2245669
tention, requiring tradeoffs between decision criteria to enhance
a sustainable energy development.
0885-8969/$31.00 © 2013 IEEE
ALSAYED et al.: MULTICRITERIA OPTIMAL SIZING OF PHOTOVOLTAIC-WIND TURBINE GRID CONNECTED SYSTEMS 371
Technical literature is rich in contributions proposing meth- II. SYSTEM MODELING AND DESIGN CONSTRAINTS
ods developed to achieve the optimal sizing of hybrid PGSs.
In this section, the mathematical models used to simulate
Different approaches have been used in the past based on dif- different PV-WT size combinations, as well as design technical
ferent methods: particle swarm optimization (PSO) [1], genetic
constraints are presented.
algorithms [2], [3], mixed integer nonlinear programming [4],
The main goal of PGS is to satisfy the load demand and
hybrid simulated annealing-tabu search algorithm [5], and other enhance a sustainable development. When HRE sources are
contributions focusing on optimizing hybrid PGS costs, main-
abundant, the extra generated power, after having satisfied the
taining specific technical performance [6]–[10]; the main goal
load demand, is considered with zero economic value in the
of the presented methods is the reduction of system costs by following analysis. In fact, it is assumed that the HRE plant have
applying economic-environment and/or techno-economic opti-
to be designed in order to fit as best as possible the load profile,
mization algorithms. Basically, a single objective function to be selling extra energy to local utility companies at no convenient
minimized is considered; this function is mainly represented by cost conditions. On the contrary, when energy sources are poor,
the total system cost; the other technical-environmental require-
the energy shortage is fulfilled by the grid. Hence, load demand
ments can be included in the optimization sizing process by profile is an important input to be taken into consideration in
following two approaches: The first way is to consider such re- the formulation problem, and is considered as known data of the
quirements as additional constraints, while the other approach is
system.
based on the conversion of the additional requirement units into
costs to ensure unit consistency, and then add such variables to
the objective function. The latter methods are not always prac- A. PV System Model
tical since some of the system variables might not be easily Power produced by the PV plant PPV can be calculated
unified into a single unit. Moreover, in both approaches it is through the following relationship:
assumed that all system requirements/variables have the same
importance with respect to the final decision. PPV (t) = NPV VOC (t)ISC (t)ηPVinv. F F (t) . (1)
More insightful approaches have been presented in [11]
and [12] where, by using a multiobjective PSO or genetic algo- Since VOC and ISC are strictly depending on the operating
rithms, authors are able to simultaneously optimize more objec- temperature TC and the global irradiance G relationships (2)–(4)
tive functions (environment, economic, and technical) in order are used to take into consideration such dependences [13]:
to find the Pareto set, which is considered the optimal solution
set. Hence, these methods provide different PV-WT configura-
VOC (t) = VOC.STC + KV (TC (t) − Tref (t)) (2)
tions candidate as the best one, leaving the final decision to the
decision-maker preferences, which might not be a simple task; G(t)
ISC (t) = {ISC.STC + KI [TC (t) − Tref (t)]} (3)
moreover, also in this case, the same importance is assigned to 1000
all criteria. Basically, most of the already proposed solutions NCOT − 20
could not be able to extract the best combination of PV-WT TC (t) = TA (t) + G(t). (4)
800
system, which is the best compromise among different nature
criteria, yielding to a suboptimal solution. B. Wind Turbine System Model
In order to overcome some of the aforementioned limita-
tions, in this paper, multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) The power output of a WT is determined by the wind speed
approaches are exploited in order to define the optimal siz- distribution; the latter can be calculated using [14]
ing share between PV and WT power generation systems. The ξ
proposed solution allows us to achieve the optimal sizing by HW T
v (t) = vr (t) . . (5)
simultaneously applying different criteria (technical, economic, Hr
environmental, and social), without the need to convert them
into a unified unit. Moreover, sensitivity of the proposed algo- The output power produced from WT is then calculated by
rithms has been analyzed, by considering different weighting
criteria techniques and different fluctuation scenarios of wind 1
PW Tm ax (t) = ρAν(t)3 CP ηW TInv. ηM ech. (6)
speed and solar radiation profiles. This procedure can be ap- 2
plied either during the design of a new hybrid PGS or during ⎧
⎪ 0 v(t) < vci
⎪
⎪
the evaluation of different expansion alternatives of an already ⎨ PW T.m ax vci ≤ v(t) < vra
existing system. PW T.out = . (7)
⎪
⎪ Pr vra ≤ v(t) ≤ vco
The paper is organized as follows: Analytical models adopted ⎪
⎩
in the following analysis is shown in Section II, while MCDA 0 vco < v(t)
mechanism and the proposed optimization approach are de-
scribed in Section III; simulation results of a practical case are The aforementioned PV and WT mathematical models have
presented in Section IV, and finally, conclusions are shown in been used to predict and simulate the generated power associated
Section V. to different PV-WT alternatives.
372 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENERGY CONVERSION, VOL. 28, NO. 2, JUNE 2013
C. Design Criteria
In this paper, different design criteria have been chosen to
be optimized, reflecting environmental, economic, and social
performance of the proposed PGS.
Environmental Criteria—Emissions Reduction (C1 ): The at-
mospheric pollutants reduction of sulfur dioxide (SO2 ) and
nitrogen oxide (NOx ) emissions, achieved by adopting HRE
sources to fulfill the load instead of fossil-fueled thermal units,
is estimated in ton/h emission as [11]
T
2
T Fig. 1. Applied membership functions for social acceptance (SA).
Emss. = α + β Pout (t) + γ Pout (t) (8)
t=1 t=1 TABLE I
APPLIED RULES FOR SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE (SA)
where T is the analyzed period which is equal to 8760 h (one
year).
Economic Criteria—Estimated Costs (C2 ): This design cri-
terion is calculated as the sum of initial investment, operational
and maintenance, and energy bought from the grid costs minus
the salvage value of the PVs and WTs. Calculation of this per-
formance criterion, labeled in the following as EC, is achieved
by using the following equations [11]:
Iinv. = P VP P VC + W TP W TC (9)
N P V The profiles displayed in Fig. 1 have been used in the proposed
1+β case study, where the maximum allowable installed WT power
SVPV P = P VP P VSV (10)
1+γ has been imposed to be equal to 200 kW; moreover, wind turbine
N W T power systems whose power rated sizes are 10, 30, and 50 kW
1+β have also been taken into consideration; since the minimum
SVW T P = W TP W TSV (11)
1+γ number of WTs is imposed, the combination of the three wind
SVPGS P = SVPV P+ SVW T P (12) turbine sizes allows a maximum possible number of WTs equal
to 5. As regards the land use calculation, it has been assumed
N PV i
1+ψ that 1 kW of installed PV power requires 10 m2 [16], while
OMPV P = P VP P VOM (13)
1+γ land required by wind turbine is evaluated by considering the
i=1
installation regulations and rules of thumb. Total land required
N WT i
1+ψ for PGS is the sum of that required by PV and WT.
OMW T P = W TP W TOM (14) Social criteria analysis models can vary from site to site, as the
i=1
1+γ
local community acceptance or resistance is strongly dependent
OMPGS P = OMPV P + OMW T P (15) on the site category.
Cgrid = Egrid Ecost (16)
D. Design Constraint
Iinv. − SVPGS P + OMPGS P
EC = + Cgrid . (17) The total energy lost (TEL) due to extra power generation
NP
from HRE system is minimized by imposing the regulation that
Social Criteria—Social Acceptance (C3 ): Social acceptabil- such a quantity should not exceed a specific threshold THR over
ity (SA) is included as social performance evaluation criteria a defined analyzed period T , which is assumed here to be 8760 h
in order to take into consideration the social resistance to the (1 year). The following equations impose this constraint:
installation of hybrid PV-WT PGS. In this context, land use and ⎧ T
⎪
visual impact have been included as social negative effects, as ⎪
⎨ (EPGS (t) − LD(t)), if LD(t) < EPGS (t)
well as electromagnetic interferences, acoustic noise, shadow TEL = t=1 (18)
flicker, and eco-system disturbance [15]. ⎪
⎪
⎩ 0, else
In this paper, the social criteria technique is performed by
using a fuzzy logic algorithm, where the land used area of PGS 0 < TEL ≤ THR (19)
and the number of required WT are the input variables, while
the output of this algorithm is a social acceptance indicator. where EPGS is the energy generated by PGS and LD is the load
Membership functions applied to input and output quantities demand. The total energy lost due to extra generated power is
are shown in Fig. 1, while applied fuzzy rules are shown in sold to the grid according to the adopted system energy manage-
Table I. In this paper higher priority is given to PGS installation ment strategy. Therefore, the proposed optimization approach
with the minimum number of WTs fitting the required power. considers extra installed power as unjustified additional cost
ALSAYED et al.: MULTICRITERIA OPTIMAL SIZING OF PHOTOVOLTAIC-WIND TURBINE GRID CONNECTED SYSTEMS 373
Weights = [ w1 w2 ··· wn ]
b
wj = dj dj where 0 ≤ wj ≤ 1 and
b
wjb = 1.
j =1 j =1
⎡ ⎤
A1 X11 X12 ··· X1n (20) (26)
A2 ⎢ X 21 X22 ··· X2n ⎥ The two aforementioned weighting methods can be suitably
X = .. = ⎢
⎣ ... .. .. ⎥
. ⎦
.. combined by using two different approaches: the additive syn-
. . .
thesis combination weighting method (ASCWM) and the multi-
Am Xm 1 Xm 2 ··· Xm n m ×n plication synthesis combination weighting method (MSCWM)
where X is the performance matrix, Xij is the performance of [20].
ith alternative against jth criteria, n is the number of criteria ASCWM and MSCWM are calculated using
and m is the number of alternatives. A1 to Am are the possible
alternatives. In this research, Xij are determined by means of ASCWM = (q × wjs ) + ((1 − q) × wjb ) (27)
PV-WT alternatives simulations. ws .wb
In order to solve multicriteria problems, the definition of MSCWM = n j sj b (28)
j =1 wj .wj
criteria and alternatives, as already given in the previous section,
is required; in addition, the weights associated to criteria and where q (0 < q < 1) is a linear combination coefficient defining
performance matrix are requested. the importance of wjs and wjb in ASCWM [20].
n
Π(b, a) = Pj (b, a).wj (43)
j =1
1
φ− (a) = Π(x, a) (45)
m−1
x∈A
TABLE II TABLE V
INPUT DATA INSTALLED POWER OF EACH PV-WT COMBINATIONS AND TEL
TABLE VI
PERFORMANCE MATRIX X
Fig. 5. Wind speed, solar radiation, temperature, and load demand profiles.
TABLE III
WT AND PV MODULE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
hybrid wind/PV systems,” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., vol. 13, no. 1,
pp. 70–75, Mar. 1998.
[10] R. Chedid, H. Akiki, and S. Rahman, “A decision support technique for
the design of hybrid solar—wind power systems,” IEEE Trans. Energy
Convers., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 76–83, Mar. 1998.
[11] L. Wang and C. Singh, “Multicriteria design of hybrid power generation
systems based on a modified particle swarm optimization algorithm,”
IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 163–172, Mar. 2009.
[12] Y. A. Katsigiannis, P. S. Georgilakis, and E. S. Karapidakis, “Multiobjec-
tive genetic algorithm solution to the optimum economic and environmen-
tal performance problem of small autonomous hybrid power system with
renewable,” IET Renewable Power Generat., vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 404–419,
2010.
[13] A. Kornelakis and E. Koutroulis, “Methodology for the design optimiza-
tion and the economic analysis of grid-connected photovoltaic systems,”
IET Renewable Power Generat. J., vol. 3, pp. 476–492, 2009.
[14] J. Twiddel and T. Weir, Renewable Energy Resources, 2nd ed. New
York, USA: Taylor & Francis, 2006.
Fig. 8. Sensitivity analysis to wind speed and solar radiation profile variations. [15] E. Hau, Wind turbines, Fundamentals, Technologies, Application, Eco-
nomics, 2nd ed. New York, USA: Springer-Verlag, 2006.
[16] Z. Sen, Solar Energy Fundamentals and Modeling Techniques: Atmo-
independently on MCDA algorithms and considered input data sphere, Environment, Climate Change and Renewable Energy. New
profile variations, alternative C is the best PV-WT configuration, York, USA: Springer-Verlag, 2008.
[17] J. Figueira, S. Greco, and M. Ehrgott, Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis:
confirming the robustness of this design solution to input data State of the Art Surveys. New York, USA: Springer Science + Business
variations. Media, Inc, 2005.
[18] W. Edwards and F. H. Barron, “Smarts and smarter: Improved simple
methods for multiattribute utility measurement,” Elsevier J. Org. Behav.
V. CONCLUSION Human Decis. Processes, vol. 60, pp. 306–325, 1994.
[19] R. V. Rao, Decision Making in the Manufacturing Environment: Using
Optimal sizing of PV-WT grid connected PGSs can be Graph Theory and Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods.
achieved by performing the proposed analysis, where different New York, USA: Springer-Verlag, 2007.
MCDA algorithms exploiting different weighting methods have [20] J.-J. Wang, Y.-Y. Jing, C.-F. Zhang, and J.-H. Zhao, “Review on multi-
criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making,” El-
been applied. The proposed procedure gives decision maker the sevier J. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., vol. 13, pp. 2263–2278,
flexibility to include any kind of criteria, allowing him/her to 2009.
verify the effect of these criteria on the optimal solutions, under
different input data sensitivity scenarios. This procedure can be
considered a viable guidance in the design process.
Giuseppe Scarcella (M’99) received the M.S. and Giacomo Scelba (S’04–M’07) received the M.S. and
Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from the Uni- Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from the Uni-
versity of Catania, Catania, Italy, in 1995 and 1999, versity of Catania, Catania, Italy, in 2002 and 2005,
respectively. respectively.
In 1999, he joined the Department of Electri- He is currently an Assistant Professor in the
cal, Electronic, and Systems Engineering, Univer- Department of Electric, Electronic and Computer Sci-
sity of Catania, as a temporary Researcher, working ence, University of Catania. His current research in-
on sensorless control of electrical drives with high- terests include sensorless control, digital signal pro-
frequency signal injection. In 2001, he obtained a cessing, ac drive control technologies, and control
permanent position as an Assistant Professor, in the techniques for renewable energy systems.
same department, where, since 2005, he is an As-
sociate Professor in the areas of power electronics, electrical machines, and
drives. He is the author or coauthor of more than 100 technical papers pub-
lished on journals and proceedings of national and international conferences
and holds several national and international patents. His current research inter-
ests include sensorless control of electrical machines, advanced control, digital
modulation techniques, efficiency optimization techniques, and electromagnetic
compatibility.