You are on page 1of 34

SharePoint Governance

Checklist Guide

checklists
Welcome to the Microsoft Office SharePoint
Server 2007 Governance Checklist Guide!

Included in this Microsoft® Office SharePoint® Server 2007


Governance Checklist Guide is a collection of hand-selected
checklists and tips that provide comprehensive governance
information to ensure that your IT organization is following the
same standards for SharePoint governance as the experts.

This guide can be used alone to develop your governance plan,


as a quick reference guide that accompanies the SharePoint
Governance Plan, or as a foundation for your SharePoint
governance.

You can download the SharePoint Governance Plan and find


supporting information on SharePoint governance by visiting this
link:

http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=90916&clcid=0x409

We hope you will find this checklist guide useful for your
SharePoint deployments. We welcome your feedback on this
checklist guide. Please visit the above link and let us know your
thoughts.

The SharePoint Product and Technologies Teams


June 2007
SharePoint Governance Plan: Intranet Model.

Microsoft Office SharePoint Products and technologies are powerful


and effective tools that increase collaboration and communication in
a shared environment. SharePoint technologies offer a flexible and
efficient way for users to create their own workspace solutions for
collaborative projects and groups.

However, as with other collaboration environments without proper


governance, a SharePoint deployment can become unmanageable,
a disorganized collection of sites, users and links, through the same
pathways that provide such flexibility and power when properly
deployed.

In a balanced and well-defined SharePoint governance plan, consistent


rules and guidelines are instituted that give users just enough flexibility
and control to produce customized, manageable solutions, but also
provides enough oversight so that the solutions retain manageability.
Steps to a Successful Managed Deployment

1. Consistency of platform, browsers, collaboration and enterprise search


strategy.

2. Manage as centrally as possible with a tight team with a means to


communicate to the CXOs that have a vested interest.

3. Have a killer backup strategy that meets the needs of your business and
make sure it works before day one.

4. End-user training and education in addition to good content and


search is the key to end user adoption.

5. Have a Governance and Information Management Plan. Branding


consistency with a corporate style guide and consistent taxonomy.
Make approved master pages available in site galleries for consistency
which will inform users they are on the corporate Intranet.

6. Enforce workflows and approval on document centers and pages where


official documentation comes together. Leverage version history and
version control to maintain a history and master document that all can
refer to.

7. Life cycle managed site collections, and document libraries with


information management policies such as content types with auditing
and expiration.

8. Properly secure corporate assets. Sites with (PII) personally identifiable


information should be appropriately flagged and secured and audited.

9. A corporate browse and search strategy for the enterprise will ensure
you are making the most out of your intranet assets as well as
encourage culture change, best practices and adoption.

10. Platform Usage Policies and development and test environments ensure
only the code you want to introduce follows corporate guidelines and
will ensure the environment is supportable and able to maintain SLAs
(Service Level Agreements).
Governance Checklist Guide Index

Front-to-Back

Introduction 2-4

Index 5

Checklists 6-16

Information Architecture 6

Project & Operational Management 7-8

Development & Configuration 9-10

Infrastructure 11

Testing & Provisioning 12

Operational Concerns 13

Education & Training 14

Taxonomy & Navigation 15

Enterprise Search 16

Custom Checklist 17

Back-to-Front

Tips & Information 2-13

Enterprise Search 2

Taxonomy & Navigation 3

Education & Training 4

Operational Concerns 5

Testing & Provisioning 6

Infrastructure 7

Development & Configuration 8-9

Project & Operational Management 10-11

Information Architecture 12

Information Architecture Guide (graphic) 13

Notes 14-17
INFORMATION ARCHITECTURE

 Ensure understanding of what information architecture is and how it


fits in with the Intranet strategy
 Ensure stakeholders understand why information architecture is
critical
 Consider hiring an information architecture professional
 Build wireframes for 4-5 most popular pages (for example, a Home
page, a Policies and Procedures page, a Department page, and a
Search Results page)
 Design simple sketches for each wireframe (links, content and full
functionality to be added later)
 Create a sitemap to plan the overall structure
 Create sitemap subsections for popular groups or departments,
then build out lower-level sections, such as Project sites
 Build content types for structured departments, regions, or business
site collections
Project & Operational Management

communication
 Establish a communications plan (include):
 Who will do communications plan?
 When the communications will occur?
 What the communications will contain?
 What format the communications will be in?
 Create contacts list and include links for those involved across the
deployment, include stakeholders and global operations contacts

deployment process
 Define a deployment process for in-house and third-party software
change management process
 Define how changes will be tracked, catalogued, and approved
 Decide where older versions of configurations, code, and compiled
components will be stored

cost allocation
 Decide if you will be allocating costs back to business or not:
 WILL NOT: consider where the costs will be centered (compare
with e-mail)
 WILL: Consider what metrics you’ll use for the charge back (# of
sites, amount of storage, amount of activity, etc.)

sponsorship
 Establish a SharePoint Governance board to review adoption and
controls
 Solicit executive champions to create management attention to the
value of the initiative
 Encourage business evangelists to share power of SharePoint with
other business leaders
Project & Operational Management

roles and terms


 Define clear roles and responsibilities for the initiation of the
SharePoint technologies platforms
 Define clear roles and responsibilities for the initiation of the
SharePoint operation
 Define strategic teams to address strategy issues
 Establish cross-functional problem resolution to address complex
issues which arise

site and platform classification


 Create classifications by number of users and longevity (include):
 Create an Enterprise classification
 Create a Departmental classification
 Create a Team classification
 Create a Project classification
 Create a Personal classification
 Create classifications by type of use (include):
 Create a portal for communications classification
 Create an application for tactical results classification
 Create a collaboration to facilitate team operations classification

service level agreements


 Create a service level agreement around the length of time and
approvals necessary to create a site
 Establish service level agreements for problem resolution through
the help desk
 Negotiate performance service level agreements for the first load
of a site, subsequent loads of a site, and performance at remote
locations
DEVELOPMENT & CONFIGURATION

customization tools

 Define what customization tools will be allowed


 Communicate what actions will be allowed and not allowed in the
tools (i.e. unghosting)

site definitions and templates


 Establish guidelines for the development of site definitions and
mechanisms for coordinating ID usage
 Communicate policies for site template deployment, such as the
requirements for a globally installed template

source code and build control


 Determine if a central repository will be required for all code
installed on the platform
 Establish standards for building components either on a centralized
server or as guidelines for building software
 Communicate expectations as to reference documentation
(compiler generated) and warnings (whether they are allowed)

on-going source code support

 Describe the responsibilities of business unit for ongoing code


support

development standards
 Consider guidelines for which assemblies may be installed to the
Global Assembly Cache (GAC) and which may not
 Establish rules about the use of the AllowPartiallyTrustedCallers
DEVELOPMENT & CONFIGURATION

branding
 Establish templates for what the SharePoint sites will look like
 Determine which types of sites may be modified and which may not
 Define which parts of the template may be changed by site owners,
and which may not
 Create and manage a master page gallery and create solution
deployments packages to rollout if necessary
 Ensure that your site’s visual designer includes some sort of
branding in all content creation
 Require use of templates on higher level pages to enforce brand
consistency
 Remember to allow room for sub-branding of individual teams or
project brands
INFRASTRUCTURE

firewalls

 Consider rules for outbound connections from the web servers for
use by the XML and RSS Viewer web part
 Communicate firewall and security restrictions including any web
part restrictions such as ActiveX controls or external RSS

recovery, load balancing and failover


 Decide upon and communicate the backup, clustering, load
balancing and failover strategy and related service level agreements

environments

 Define the environments which will be used to develop and test


solutions in SharePoint
 Describe the actions which are expected and those which are
prohibited in each environment
 Communicate policies for site template deployment such as the
requirements for a globally installed template
TESTING & PROVISIONING

testing
 Prior to launch, require content owners or editors to test their own
content
 Offer a convenient mechanism for site owners to provide testing
feedback
 Create thorough test plans and let site owners know specifically
what you want them to test

provisioning
 Determine an approval process for information policies such as
expiration, compliance and auditing
 Establish and document user policies and rights policies including
securing restricted areas
 Publish guidelines outlining appropriate application and content
types
 Consider forbidding confidential data on your SharePoint site or
limiting it to specific site collections or web applications which are
more tightly controlled, audited, and managed
 Clearly define remote access policies to ensure security
OPERATIONAL CONCERNS

monitoring, uptime and downtime

 Establish monitoring at the server and web application level


 Define responses to each type of failure that may occur; use
Microsoft Operations Manager Packs for applicable areas in the
deployment such as IIS, SQL, WSS 3.0, and SharePoint Server 2007
 Define scheduled downtime periods if needed
 Communicate the procedure to report unscheduled downtime or
specific performance issues (consider using another medium for
outage notification)
 Define response procedures to unscheduled downtime

disaster recovery

 Plan for single file recovery (perhaps using version control and the
recycle bin)
 Plan for single or multiple site recovery
 Plan for server recovery
 Plan for data center recovery

data and document recovery


 Codify corporate records management requirements into SharePoint
 Define rules for archive of sites including warnings and approvals

quotas and reporting

 Establish default storage quota templates by web application


 Establish process for requesting a larger quota, including maximum
quotas
 Define required auditing reports and establish storage usage reports,
including how the data will be gathered and frequency
 Develop activity based reporting for administrators and business
users
EDUCATION & TRAINING

training budget
 Include realistic training costs as part of your earliest estimates
 Allocate budget for IT staff, Development staff, and business users.
Consider train the trainer and onsite training to reduce costs

initial training
 Acquire end user training and resources
 Acquire help desk training and resources
 Acquire administrator training and resources
 Develop administrator policy guides which describe organization
specific policies
 Acquire developer training and resources
 Develop developer policy guides which describe organization specific
development policies
 Provide separate training for site managers, application designers,
information workers, and end users

community development
 Create online forums where users can support each other and ask
questions
 Create opportunities for face-to-face learning in unstructured or
semi-structured environments, such as lunch and learns or after
hours discussions

renewal training
 Plan for renewal training which gathers the learning from multiple
groups and exposes it to other groups
 Perform periodic audits of the platform to discover what features are
not being utilized and which features are not being utilized correctly
NAVIGATION & TAXONOMY

taxonomy
 Give one group control over the taxonomy
 Consider hiring or utilizing a professional taxonomist or in house
taxonomist who has been trained or has experience with SharePoint
technology
 Use the taxonomy for consistent labeling of the site
 Build one set of taxonomy labels prior to finalizing your wireframes
 Update taxonomy to provide useful search metadata

site directories
 Define the structure of the site directories including the major
groupings and associations
 Develop a linking strategy between different types of sites such as
enterprise, divisional, departmental, team, etc.

content types
 Define core content types in the organization and include in site
templates or site definitions
 Define key fields to link documents and operational systems
ENTERPRISe SEARCH

search
 Assign workflows for content creation so only the best information is
available for search indexing
 Integrate your taxonomy with search planning
 Use hit highlighting, best bets, and people search
 Incorporate alternative content forms such as blogs and Wikis into
your search results
 Utilize BDC functionality in SharePoint to enable search on customer
relationship management or partners, products and more

search locations
 Establish content sources to the file based repositories in the
organization
 Use the Business Data Catalog to allow searching of business data

search relevancy
 Define who will be responsible for core relevancy settings
 Implement organizational enhancements of the noise words file,
thesaurus file, and keyword best bests
CUSTOM CHECKLIST

additional checklist items

notes, acronyms, definitions, and references


SharePoint Governance
Checklist Guide

tips & info


ENTERPRISe SEARCH

the business data catalog

The Business Data Catalog provides the bdcMetadata.XSD file, an XML


Schema Definition File (XSD) that defines the XML element mapping
structure necessary for creating an Application Definition file. When
authoring metadata using Microsoft Visual Studio 2005, valuable
IntelliSense support can be gained by copying XML definition to a
working folder and setting the schemaLocation attribute of the root
element to point to this schema. The BdcMetadata.XSD file can be located
in the “\Bin” folder of the Office SharePoint Server 2007 installation
directory, normally located at “<root>\Program Files\Microsoft Office
Server\12.0\Bin\”.

multiple bdc application definitions

When developing BDC Application definitions, the easiest approach to


creating the definition is to include all fields in the table, making them
available for later use by anyone. Typically, an organization will be very
selective as to which fields are available to end users. Depending on the
search relevancy
architecture of your application, some fields may be sensitive or even
encrypted. This can produce extended discussions on which fields are
useful and appropriate for users throughout the organization. It may be
that an organization decides to create multiple Application Definitions
to the same data structure, one perhaps complete with all fields and one
restrictive with limited field access, then assigning specific permissions only
allowing company access to the more restrictive of the definitions.

using web parts to add application definitions

Web Parts are the easiest way to surface data from new Application
Definitions. When clicking “Add a Web Part” on any SharePoint page,
select “Business Data List” and add it to the page. When first added, the
Web Part properties must be set to use an available BDC Entity as its
source. (For readability, select “Edit View” from the toolbar).
NAVIGATION & TAXONOMY

taxonomy governance model

A taxonomy is a structured way of ordering words, labels, tags, etc.


for a Web site. It’s similar to a vocabulary list with a set of guidelines
for definitions and usage. A taxonomy helps to define and control the
way a Web site is organized, what things are named, and how people
find information. In short, a taxonomy makes it easier to organize and
find things on a Web site.

Taxonomic Section Characteristics Owners


Central/Corporate • Permanent • Portal
Portal • Controlled; tightly governed administrators
• Push information to users • Corporate
• Dashboards, Business stakeholders
Intelligence, BPM
• Applications, Content
Division Portals • Permanent • Portal
• Controlled; tightly governed administrators
• Push information to users • Divisional business
• All public sites - content is owners
divisional information
• Dashboards, Business
Intelligence, BPM
• Applications, Content
Department, Group • Permanent and Temporary • Divisional business
& Team Sites • Sharing information (push/pull) owners
• Collaboration • Departmental
• Ad hoc, lax control business owners
Project Team Sites • Short lived, timed expiration • Departmental
and Workspaces • Collaboration business owners
• Ad hoc, lax control
My Sites • Permanent • Portal
• Personal info administrators
• Pull information • Employees
• Ad hoc, lax control
EDUCATION & TRAINING

most common roles and suggested training

System Administrators:
This role is responsible for Server and database management and will
allocate physical infrastructure, install SharePoint, provision and configure
web applications, and provide for top level security administration.
Training should include deployment practices, SharePoint Central
Administration, monitoring, maintenance, backup/restore, disaster
recovery, and management of Shared Service Providers.

Developers:
This role needs education on the structure to be followed in the
organization for developing add-ins and solutions based on SharePoint
technologies. This should include the deployment process, development
environments, development life cycle management, coding standards,
and policies such as security levels and whether code can be deployed in
the GAC.

Help Desk Personnel:


This role is the first in line to the end users. Much of the training and
education for the help desk should be focused around problem resolution
and how to locate the right resources when needed.

Information Workers:
This role configures and extends site and list level feature sets. This
includes branding, advanced Web Part features, workflows, and other
integration points. Training should include SharePoint Designer, Shared
Service Provider interface for Search or other Service Management, Site
Settings, InfoPath, and standard SharePoint site administrator interfaces.

End Users:
This role will account for the bulk of SharePoint users and skills will vary
greatly. Core daily use will include basic navigation, search, and document
management. Focus should be on understanding lists, user interfaces,
navigation, workflows, upload, offline, and interaction with client
applications.
OPERATIONAL CONCERNS

monitoring

It’s important to monitor at the level of detail that will let you know with
confidence that if the site is down that you will be notified there is a
problem. You can do this by pinging the server, checking the status of
services, testing health-check pages, etc. Failure of the system to respond
in the expected way may be a reason to alert administrators or take
automated actions to take the server out of the load balancer. Defining
what the monitoring policies are, including who will be notified when
there is a problem with the server, or with an individual site will eliminate
confusion as to who owns the resolution of server problems – including
problems with specific sites.

disaster recovery and backup

The fundamental building block of disaster recovery plans are backups.


Backups of the data, failover hardware, and redundant connectivity. The
way that backups are performed is essential to the SharePoint governance
process because it establishes expectations on what is recoverable or not.
Defining the process for requesting recovery and the timeline for that
recovery further establishes the kind of expectations from SharePoint
that improve adoption. Be sure to consider a variety of disasters: natural
(flood, fire, tornado, earthquake), server (offline, dead), user accidents (file
deletion, saving issues, crashes), and site (failure, corruption, error).

storage and quotas

Centralized SharePoint platforms must be concerned about total storage.


SharePoint can rapidly become the new file storage platform within an
organization – and as a result consume massive amounts of storage very
quickly. One of the ways to combat this problem is to establish quotas for
sites as they are created. Each site is given a small amount of storage and
they’re allowed to request more as they need it. The governance process
should include the amount of space initially allocated by type of site
being provisioned as well as the process for requesting more space.
TESTING & PROVISIONING

pre-launch testing

Prior to launching, require site owners to test their own content. Set up
schedules for them to review content every other day during the testing
cycle.

To make it as easy as possible to hear back from these testers, provide


an online form or similarly convenient way for site owners to provide
feedback during testing. You need to get feedback fast to make changes,
so don’t get bogged down in massive spreadsheets.

It’s best to create test plans that test all necessary functionality, such
as links to other programs. Provide site owners with a specific checklist
of exactly what functionality you want them to check. If you make the
assumption they’ll just know what to do, you may be disappointed with
the results.

testing plan

Building a strong user acceptance testing plan up front will help business
stakeholders see for themselves that the project objectives have been
met, before the intranet is widely available.

test environments

The fundamental building block of disaster recovery plans are backups.


Backups of the data, backup hardware, and backup interconnection
gear. The way that backups are performed is essential to the SharePoint
governance process because it establishes expectations on what is
recoverable or not.
INFRASTRUCTURE

firewall best practice

It is a best practice for firewalls to not allow servers to access the web
directly. Including content from a third party site through a content editor
web part or through the RSS reader web part creates exposure for cross
site scripting attacks. Controlling what sites can be linked to from these
tools is a security and operational concern.

It is typical to prevent outbound web connections from the server on port


80 or 443. This is designed to prevent malicious sites from being run on
the server and to make it harder for any potential infection to report back
on the infection’s success.

load balancing

Load balancers keep alive pages that they expect to return a standard
value to indicate that the server is operational. These pages often are
called frequently and have a very low tolerance for a response time.
Because of this the load balancers will need to be configured to access a
health page. Determining a policy for what goes on this health page and
what criteria the load balancer should use to indicate that a server has
failed can be essential for high availability applications. Developers must
know if they are expected to handle situations where a single session is
transferred between servers.

defining environments

Defining the environments for development, testing, staging or user


acceptance and deploying helps business uses and developers know
what resources they have available to test changes without impacting
production.
DEVELOPMENT & CONFIGURATION

master page wireframe

An example of a basic wireframe mirroring the out-of-the-box


functionality and layout of a standard Master Page is shown below. This
breaks down the functionality to its most basic component on a page.

Home Link User Menu

Site Title & Logo Search

Global Navigation

Title

Content Area

Current Site Navigation

WebPart Zone

Recycle Bin

after drafting and validating the wireframe

Once the wireframe has been drafted and its end user functionality has
been validated, designers can apply branding and visual treatments to
the interface. Visual compositions may take several rounds to ensure
that visual design, functional design and stakeholder acceptance reach
agreement. In fact, this phase should be carefully managed.
DEVELOPMENT & CONFIGURATION

master pages

Microsoft Office SharePoint Server 2007 provides a template-like


approach to branding where most of the user interface may be
completely redesigned to a detailed design requirement. ASP.NET 2.0
Master Pages allow for a globally applied template background to all of
SharePoint’s user and administration screens. By modifying or creating
your own custom Master Page via Microsoft Office SharePoint Designer
2007, unique visual presence and functionality can be achieved.

site definitions and site templates

In SharePoint, site definitions are file system-based resources from which


all sites are built. Site templates are a set of changes to be applied to a site
automatically after the site is created from a site definition. Understanding
and communicating the difference between site definitions and site
templates is important because site definitions require unique identifiers
and therefore, coordination. Site templates, on the other hand, require the
underlying site definition that was used to create them and as such, their
creation should occur only from approved site definitions. Upgrade and
consistency are major factors in the decisions whether or not to use site
templates or site definitions. Both will require some effort to upgrade, but
site definitions will require more effort.

building code

Environments with as many different components as SharePoint need a


level of consistency when software is developed and built. Simple things
like patches on a computer used to build code can have dramatic impacts
on the overall solution. Dedicating a computer to the purpose of building
all of the code to be deployed into production is a good risk management
approach. There is the potential that for many different internal and
external groups developing code for the SharePoint platform, having one
repository for all of code may not be the first choice. Each development
group may maintain their own source code repository. One consideration
for governance is if your size of installation warrants a policy that requires
all code be built on a centralized build computer from a centralized
source code repository.
PROJECT & OPERATIONAL MANAGEMENT

defining roles

Defining roles within the governance team and within SharePoint


deployment at large is a seemingly uncomplicated task that often
becomes difficult as staff rotates. Consider defining roles around: project
management, service owner, operational management, and development.

Project Management:
These roles include actions which must occur to manage the project
through to completion. Time and cost management of the platform
project, communication of objectives, ensuring the production of
deliverables, guiding the timelines, and management of expectations are
all critical actions that should happen from a project management role(s).

Service Owner:
These roles are for managing the ongoing life of a centralized governance
and platform. Service Manager or owner roles are the advisory or steering
committee roles which will guide the SharePoint governance over the
long term. Explaining what actions are expected out of these roles as well
as the frequency of commitment can be helpful.

Operational Management:
These roles are responsible for the day-to-day care and feeding of
the system including backups and restores, monitoring, and capacity
management. These do not have to be dedicated roles but are instead
roles which already exist within your organization. They should be defined
as a part of the SharePoint governance in order to make it clear what
kinds of operational management support is expected.

Development:
These roles may seem odd for a centralized platform. The platform itself
may largely be out-of-the-box functionality of SharePoint. However,
integrating SharePoint into your environments, handing secure sign on,
creating site definitions, and many other tasks may best be centralized so
no one user must bear the burden and consistency exists throughout the
solution.
PROJECT & OPERATIONAL MANAGEMENT

common site classification types

Enterprise:
A plan for enterprise sites has the highest level of governance associated
with it. Enterprise sites tend to be focused on communication – on
the dissemination of information and not so much on collaboration or
working together. Because it will be accessed by the entire organization,
it’s essential that it match the relative appearance of the other sites
and that it be available most of the time. Out-of-band patches and
upgrades to core functionality implemented through code will need
to be minimized. Taxonomy and the need for a consistent approach to
organization of information is necessary as well.

Departmental:
Departmental sites still have a large number of users even if the entire
enterprise isn’t dependant upon them. Having specific governance
around departmental sites allows you to relax some standards for
enterprise-type sites and create solutions which more directly fit the
collaborative needs of the department. The departmental site may still
have governance on branding but may allow more out-of-band updates
to core code leveraged by the departmental site. Where decision making
is more centralized about the types of updates that can be made to
an enterprise facing site because of their broad use, decisions about
implementation schedules for departmental sites can, and should, rest
with the department.

Ad-Hoc:
Perhaps the greatest volume of SharePoint sites are ad-hoc sites created
to support meetings, committees, or other sub-groups which have less
formal structure and fewer people than a departmental solution. Ad-hoc
sites need less governance, except in the areas of quota and retention.
While enterprise and departmental sites have a long life, ad-hoc sites
may live only a few days, such as sites supporting the development of an
RFP response, or a few weeks, like a site for a company picnic planning
committee. Because of the large volume of requests and the short
duration of the need developing a policy around site retention (and
therefore document retention) is critical.
INFORMATION ARCHITECTURE

about information architecture

More often than not, companies fail to plan for adequate testing of the
site prior to launch, resulting in everything from broken links to a site
that doesn’t meet the original business stakeholders’ goals. Organizations
typically fall short in adequately training employees on how to use or
create content for the intranet, once again severely reducing its ongoing
value.

So, what specifically can you do to eliminate chaos and build a better
intranet from the start? Use Microsoft Office SharePoint Server to create a
managed single environment, and build in plans for governance up front.

A Web site’s information architecture determines how the information in


that site — its Web pages, documents, lists, and data — is organized and
presented to the site’s users. Information architecture is often recorded as
a hierarchical list of site content, search keywords, data types, and other
concepts.

Analyzing the information to be presented in an Internet or intranet Web


site is an important early step in the site planning process, and this step
provides the basis for planning:

• How the site will be structured and divided into a set of site collections
and sites.
• How data will be presented in the site.
• How site users will navigate through the site.
• How information will be targeted at specific audiences.
• How search will be configured and optimized.

Although this section provides some guidance on how to analyze the


information requirements of your Internet or intranet site, you will want
to include an information architect or analyst on your site’s planning and
design team to ensure that your Web site plans fully take into account the
information architecture needs of your organization.
Microsoft Office SharePoint Server 2007 Information Architecture Guide
Stakeholder
Business

Requirements Design User


User Training
Discovery Sign-Off Acceptance
Administrator

Enterprise Server
Server

Enterprise Data Integration


Planning Build-Out/
Discovery Migration Testing
Design Installation
Information
Worker

Configuration Custom Site Integration


Design Development Configuration Testing
NOTES
NOTES
NOTES
NOTES

AKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Content Creation and Various consultants and business resources from Interknowlogy and Ascentium
Production Scott Case
Robert Bogue (SharePoint MVP)
Microsoft Corporation: Mark Wagner, Joel Oleson, Arpan Shah, Jeff Teper

Design Prowess Consulting, LLC., Seattle, WA

You might also like