Revised DPR NH-80 - 13-12-2016

GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR
ROAD CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT

NATIONAL HIGHWAY WING
Detailed Project Report

NH No. : 80
NH DIVISION : N.H. Division, Bhagalpur
NH CIRCLE : N.H. Circle, Bhagalpur
NH SECTION : Sabour – Ramjanipur
NAME OF WORK : Strengthening work of National Highway
80 from Km. 136 to Km. 166 Sabour –
Ramjanipur Section including replacement
of one Minor Damaged Arch Bridge in Km.
143 Bridge in the state of Bihar.
ESTIMATED COST : 83.415 Crores
Ref. : Annual Plan Provision for Year 2016-2017 of M/oRT&H for Bihar State
Nov. 2016
Prepared By : Transtek Engineers & Services Pvt. Ltd.

Shivpuri, P/O-Shastrinagar, Patna-23
Strengthening work of National Highway 80 from Km. 136 to Km. 166 Sabour – Ramjanipur Section including
Replacement of one Minor Damaged Arch Bridge in Km. 143 Bridge in the state of Bihar
CONTENTS
Detailed Project Report including Cost Estimate

For
Strengthening work of National Highway 80 from Km. 136 to Km. 166
Sabour – Ramjanipur Section including replacement of one Minor Damaged
Arch Bridge in Km. 143 Bridge in the state of Bihar
Chapter PARTICULARS Page No.
1. Report 01 – 14
2. Improvement Proposal and Design 15 – 28
3. General Abstract of Cost and Detailed Cost Estimate 29 – 45
4. Detailed Computation of Quantities Road and Bridge Work 46 - 86
5. Analysis of Rates 87 – 112
6. Design of Proposed Bridge including Hydraulic Particular and Sub- 113 - 248
Soil Investigation Report
7. Drawings Details: Attached in Separate Volume No. of sheets
Plan and Profile Drawing 31
Typical Cross Sections and other Miscellaneous Drawing 10
Detailed Drawings for Proposed New Bridge in Km. 143 13

1. R E P O R T
1.1 Preliminary
1.2 Authority and Plan
1.3 Introduction & Necessity
1.4 Existing Features of Project Section
1.4.1 Highway Alignment

1.4.2 Existing Road Inventory
1.4.3 Existing Right-of Way and Available Land for proposed Widening Work
1.4.4 Existing Road Crust in Project Section
1.4.5 Pavement Condition
1.4.6 Existing Bridges and CD Structures in Project Section
1.4.7 Rain / Flood Water Overtopping in the project Stretch
1.4.8 Utility Services
1.5 Sub-grade Soil Investigation Report
1.6 Traffic Count Data
1.7 Proposed New Bridge at Ch. 142.700 in replacement of existing Arch Bridge
1.8 Materials for proposed Construction work
1.9 Specification & Test Result
1.10 Labour
1.11 Rates
1.12 Project Cost Estimate
1.13 Construction Programme
1.14 Drawings
1
1. R E P O R T
1.1 Preliminary
Name of work : Strengthening work of National Highway 80 from

Km. 136 to Km. 166 Sabour – Ramjanipur Section
including replacement of one Minor Damaged Arch
Bridge in Km. 143 Bridge in the state of Bihar.
State : Bihar
Circle : N.H. Circle, Bhagalpur
Division : N.H. Division, Bhagalpur
Section : Sabour – Ramjanipur Section
N.H. No. : 80
Estimated cost : 83.415 Crores (including centages)
1.2 Authority and Plan:

This Detailed Estimate amounting to Rs. 83.415 Crores has been prepared for
Strengthening work of existing intermediate / Two Lane NH-80 Stretch Km. 136 to
Km. 166 Sabour – Ramjanipur Section including replacement of one Minor Damaged
Arch Bridge in Km. 143 Bridge in the State of Bihar under N.H. Division, Bhagalpur.
The proposed work also find place in the list of Annual Plan for Bihar State for the year
2016-2017 approved by M/oSRT&H.
1.3 Introduction & Necessity:

The NH-80 section from Bhagalpur (Km. 128) to Mirzachauki (Km. 190) at present is
the heavily loaded and busiest corridor. Due to closure of all available stone quarries in
the state of Bihar, Mirzachauki (Jharkhand) is the only nearest available stone quarries
in the state of Bihar for fulfillment of requirement of Stone metal and chips required for
ongoing infrastructure development projects. Consequently the Traffic density in the
project section has been tremendously increased. As per Traffic Census data, the project
section carries 5444 CVPD and total load of vehicle in terms of PCU is 28692. The
present Traffic scenario clearly demands for 4-Laning of Project section. However, the
existing carriageway in the project section is varying between 5.50 m. to 7.00 only.
The DPR for Up-gradation, Geometric Improvement of NH-80 Stretch (Munger -

Bhagalpur – Mirzachauki section) from km 65 to km 190 has been finalised by SAI
Consultants under M/oRT&H. Up-gradation work of NH-80 (Munger - Bhagalpur –
Mirzachauki section) from km 65 to km 190 shall be taken up by M/oRT&H as
separate project. Meanwhile, considering the deteriorating condition of existing NH-80
2
section from Km. 136 to Km. 166 (Sabour to Ramjanipur) has been taken up for its
strengthening work under Annual Plan 2016-17 approved by M/oSRT&H.
The project section under consideration from Km. 136 to Km. 166 (Sabour to
Ramjanipur) has been badly damaged due to flood over-topping and breach at several
locations. The Existing Bituminous pavement is badly damaged during the Rainy
season of August 2016. Immediate restoration and strengthening work of project section
becomes essential in view of present damage due to Rains and Flooding.
DPR for Up-gradation, Geometric improvement of NH-80 Stretch (Munger - Bhagalpur

– Mirzachauki section) from km 65 to km 190 has been finalised by SAI Consultants
under M/oRT&H. The up-gradation of NH-80 including its geometric improvement,
raising work, realignments shall be taken up by M/oRT&H as separate project.
Considering the facts, only strengthening work of existing highway without rising of
project Highway has not been up in this DPR and Cost Estimate for strengthening work
Some of the Photographs of Project section is attached below for perusal
Image of Road condition in Km 139 (Breach Zone) Image of Road condition in Km. 143 (Breach Zone)
Image of road condition in Km. 143 Image of road condition at chainage 144 Km
Image of road condition in Km. 144 Image of road condition at Km. 152
3
Image of road Condition in Km. 161 Image of road condition at Km. 163
Image of road condition at Km.164 Image of road condition at Km. 166
Provision of GSB (150 mm. Thick) 20 % approx. has been made in cost estimate as
leveling course and filling of pot Holes. The section wise of pavement type under
strengthening work is detailed in next chapter.
Replacement of Damaged minor Arch Bridge in Km. 143

The existing narrow arch Bridge (7 x 4.60 = 33 m.) in Km. 143 of NH-80 is found in
damaged condition. Replacement of the existing Arch Bridge by New RCC High-level
Bridge is essential. Considering the available ROW in the project section, it has been
proposed to construct the New RCC High-level Bridge on existing Alignment after its
dismantling.
Suitable Diversion Shall be constructed on right side of existing bridge for smooth
movement of Traffic during construction of New Bridge.
4
1.4 Existing Features of Project Section
The Project Section under consideration from Km. 136 (Sabour) to Km. 166
(Ramjanipur) is the part of NH-80, which mainly passes through Premnagar, Sabour,
Ghoshpur, Farka, Masarh, Sankarpur, Fulkia, Ghogha, Pakkisarai, Trimuhan,
Pakartaria, Kahalgaon, Kalipura, Anadipur and finally terminates at Ramjanipur Km.
166. The existing Highway in project section is of Intermediate to Two-Lane standard.
Around 40 % of Project Section falls in Built-up section. The Right of Way in the
Project Section is found ranging from 16.00 m. to 25 m.
1.4.1 Highway Alignment

The geometric features are fairly satisfactory except for few small sections including
Built-up zones.
1.4.2 Vertical Alignment

The Project section is passing through partly Plain Terrain. Vertical Alignment in the
project stretch is also fairly satisfactory except for few locations where required
improvement has been proposed.
1.4.3 Existing Road Inventory
The summary of existing Road Inventory is presented in Table 1.1 below

Table 1.1: Summary of existing Road Inventory
Existing
Sl. From Length Total Formation Right of Way
To (Km) Carriageway
No. (Km) (m) Width (m) (m)
Width (m)
1 135 136 1000 7.000 10.4-10.6
2 136 137 1000 7.000 10.4-13.00
3 137 138 1000 7.000 9.00
4 138 139 1000 5.500 10.3
5 139 140 1000 5.500 12
6 140 141 1000 5.500 8.9
7 141 142 1000 5.500 10.2
8 142 143 1000 5.500 10.4
9 143 144 1000 5.500 9.9
10 144 145 1000 5.500 11.2
11 145 146 1000 5.500 9.60
12 146 147 1000 5.500 9.20
13 147 148 1000 5.500 10.2
14 148 149 1000 5.500 10.94
15 149 150 1000 5.500 8.9 16 m.
16 150 151 1000 5.500 8.4 to
17 151 152 1000 5.500 5.5 25 m.
18 152 153 1000 7.000 5.65
19 153 154 1000 7.000 10.7
20 154 155 1000 7.000 10.65
21 155 156 1000 7.000 10.80
22 156 157 1000 7.000 11.4
23 157 158 1000 7.000 11.4
24 158 159 1000 7.000 11.4
25 159 160 1000 7.000 8.90
26 160 161 1000 7.000 10.7
27 161 162 1000 7.000 11.6
28 162 163 1000 7.000 12.7
29 163 164 1000 7.000 10.2
30 164 165 1000 7.000 11.3
31 165 166 1000 7.000 11.2
5
Table 1.2: Built-up Area in the Project Section

Sl. From To Length Name of the Village /
No. (Km) (Km) (m) Town
1 135.000 137.150 2150.000 Prem Nagar and
Sabour
3 137.600 138.150 400.000 Khankitta
4 139.600 140.100 500.000 Ghoshpur
5 142.850 144.450 1600.000 Farka
6 144.850 145.875 1025.000 Masarh
7 147.625 148.050 425.000 Sankarpur
8 149.375 152.000 2625.000 Fulkia
9 152.000 152.225 225.000 Ghogha
10 152.800 153.025 225.000 Pakkisarai
11 153.250 153.525 275.000 Trimuhan
12 155.050 155.500 450.000 Trimuhan
13 155.700 156.100 400.000 Pakartaria
14 156.500 156.950 450.000 Kahalgaon
15 158.500 160.300 1800.000 Kalipura
16 161.400 162.375 975.000 Anadipur
17 165.270 166.000 730.000 Ramjanipur
1.4.4 Existing Road Crust in Project Section
The existing Road Crust in Project Section in Project Section is presented in

Table 1.3 below
Table 1.3: Summary of Existing Road Crust in Project Section
Existing Base & Sub- Surfacing Total Crust
Sl. From Length
To (Km) Carriageway Base Layer Layer Thickness in
No. (Km) (m)
Width (m) In mm. in mm. mm.
1 135 136 1000 7 330 65 395
2 136 137 1000 7 325 75 400
3 137 138 1000 7 310 60 370
4 138 139 1000 5.5 315 72 387
5 139 140 1000 5.5 325 82 407
6 140 141 1000 5.5 330 84 414
7 141 142 1000 5.5 325 78 403
8 142 143 1000 5.5 310 76 386
9 143 144 1000 5.5 340 77 417
10 144 145 1000 5.5 315 72 387
11 145 146 1000 5.5 330 70 400
12 146 147 1000 5.5 340 68 408
13 147 148 1000 5.5 320 64 384
14 148 149 1000 5.5 325 74 399
15 149 150 1000 5.5 330 68 398
16 150 151 1000 5.5 335 73 408
17 151 152 1000 5.5 340 69 409
18 152 153 1000 7 330 76 406
19 153 154 1000 7 325 82 407
20 154 155 1000 7 315 84 399
21 155 156 1000 7 325 79 404
22 156 157 1000 7 335 68 403
23 157 158 1000 7 320 66 386
24 158 159 1000 7 330 68 398
25 159 160 1000 7 335 73 408
26 160 161 1000 7 320 77 397
27 161 162 1000 7 315 79 394
6

Sl. From Length
No. (Km) (m)
28 162 163 1000 7 320 71 391
29 163 164 1000 7 330 68 398
30 164 165 1000 7 330 65 395
31 165 166 1000 7 320 73 393
Average Crust Thickness 398 mm.
1.4.5 Pavement Condition

The Km. wise summary of existing pavement condition is presented in Table 1.5
below.
Table 1.5: Summary Pavement Condition
Sl No From To Length Existing Remarks

(Km) (Km) (m) Pavement
Condition
1 135 136 1000 Poor Pot holes, Alligator Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks , Loss of
2 136 137 1000 Poor Aggregates and Hungry Surfaces
3 137 138 1000 Poor Alligator Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks, Loss of Aggregates
4 138 138.15 150 Poor and Hungry Surfaces have been noticed
5 138.15 139.6 1450 Extremely Poor The Road has been breached at some locations by nearby
water logged area . Except that Edge failures, Slope
failure, loss of aggregates and big pot holes
6 139.6 142 2400 Poor Disintegration, Pot holes, Alligator Cracks, Rutting, Edge
7 142 142.25 250 Poor cracks Loss of Aggregates and Hungry Surfaces
8 142.25 142.35 100 Extremely Poor The Road has been breached at the locations by nearby
defined stream line. Except that Edge failures ,Slope
failure, loss of aggregates a have been noticed
9 142.35 143 650 Poor
Big Pot holes, Alligator Cracks, , Loss of Aggregates,
10 143 144 1000 Poor
Rutting, Disintegration of aggregates, Hungry Surfaces
11 144 145 1000 Poor
and water logging in the carriageway
12 145 146 1000 Poor
13 146 146.1 100 Poor Alligator Cracks, Loss of Aggregates, Disintegration of
aggregates
14 14.1 141.25 127150 Extremely Poor Crust has been completely uprooted in the carriageway
15 146.25 147 750 Extremely Poor
16 147 147.6 600 Extremely Poor

Pot holes, Alligator Cracks, , Loss of Aggregates, Rutting,
17 147.6 148 400 Extremely Poor Disintegration of aggregates, Hungry Surfaces and water
18 148 148.15 150 Extremely Poor logging in the carriageway have been noticed. In some
19 148.15 149 850 Extremely Poor sections the surface course has been completely uprooted
20 149 150 1000 Extremely Poor
24 152.15 152.85 700 Poor Alligator Cracks, Loss of Aggregates, Disintegration of
aggregates
25 152.85 153 150 Extremely Poor In most of the section surface course have been completely
26 153 153.9 900 Extremely Poor uprooted. Presence of WMM in surface is prominent and
water logging has been noticed. At some places surface
course with big pot holes, cracks, alligator cracks and
disintegration of aggregate
27 153.9 154 100 Poor Surface course is damaged, Pot holes, alligator cracks,
28 154 155 1000 Extremely Poor Longitudinal cracks, Edge cracks, Ravelling
29 155 156 1000 Poor Pot Holes, Longitudinal Cracks , Alligator Cracks and
7
Sl No From To Length Existing Remarks

(Km) (Km) (m) Pavement
Condition
30 156 157 1000 Poor Ravelling

31 157 158 1000 Poor
32 158 159 1000 Poor Big Pot Holes , Longitudinal Cracks , Alligator Cracks and
Ravelling have been noticed. At the pot holes water
logging
32 159 159.7 700 Extremely Poor Big pot holes, Alligator Cracks , Ravelling have been
noticed . In most of the section right side pavement have
been completely failed and WMM is noticed there
33 159.7 160 300 Poor Alligator Cracks , Edge cracks , longitudinal cracks,
34 160 161 1000 Poor hairline cracks and small pot holes (at some points)
35 161 162 1000 Poor
36 162 163 1000 Extremely Poor Big potholes, Alligator Cracks, Loss of Aggregates,
37 163 164 1000 Extremely Poor Rutting, Disintegration of aggregates, Hungry Surfaces
37 164 165 1000 Extremely Poor Ravelling have been noticed. Water logging at the pot
165 166 1000 Extremely Poor holes
1.4.6 Existing Bridges and CD Structures in Project Section
a. Bridges
There are 4 Major Bridge and 6 Nos. of Minor Bridges Falls in the Project
Section. The details of Existing bridges is presented in table below:
Table: 1.6 Details of Major Bridges in the Project Section

Span Vertical Length of Width of Bridge
Sl No Chainage Type of Bridge
Arrangement Clearance Bridge Bridge Condition
1 146+050 PSC Girder 3 x 31.56 4.8 94.5 7.4 Good
2 154+060 PSC Girder 3 x 30 5.2 94.2 11.8 Good
3 154+470 Steel Truss 8 x 18.30 4.3 146.7 7.13 Good
4 157+990 PSC+RCC Girder 3 x 31 + 1 x 21 5.3 115.2 7.45 Good
Table: 1.7 Details of Minor Bridges in the Project Section

Type of Length of Width of Vertical
Sl No Chainage Bridge Condition
Bridge Bridge Bridge Clearance
1 142+710 Arch 32.240 7.400 2.700 Poor & proposed for Replacement
2 150+160 Slab 10.620 12.040 2.970 Good
3 152+460 Slab 17.500 11.200 4.200 Good
4 152+730 Slab 57.210 12.200 4.150 Good
5 158+170 Slab 11.100 7.410 2.873 Good
6 164+090 Box 17.260 7.200 1.233 Good
The existing narrow arch Bridge (7 x 4.60 = 33 m.) at Ch. 142.700 of NH-80 is found in
proposed to construct the New RCC High-level Bridge on existing Alignment after it’s
dismantling. Suitable Diversion Shall be constructed on right side of existing bridge for
smooth movement of Traffic during construction of New Bridge.
8
b. Culverts
Total 24 nos. of Culverts (HP, Slab, Slab & Box) has been identified in the project
section. Summary and condition of Existing Culverts is presented below in the table 1.8
Table 1.8 : Summary and condition of Existing Culverts

Type of
SL Structure Span Length Width of Vertical
Location Condition
No (Pipe, Slab Box, Arrangement of Span Culvert Clearance
Arch)
1 135+140 HP 1x1 1 12.1 0.65 Out of Total 24 Culverts
2 136+030 HP 1x1 1 12.1 1.12 condition of 7 Culverts
3 139+080 HP 2x1 2.86 7 3.42 are very alarming and
4 139+140 HP 1x1 1 20.7 1.15 needs immediate
5 142+290 HP 2x1 2 20.2 1.06 replacement by New
6 145+810 HP 1 x 1.00 1.0 12.15 1.05 Box Culvert as detailed
in Table 1.9 below.
7 147+050 Slab 1x2.75 2.75 8 4.38
8 148+330 Slab 1x5.70 5.7 9.75 1.4
9 149+140 Slab 1x0.55 0.55 1x1.85 2.98 For remaining culverts
10 149+820 Slab 1x0.92 0.92 12.3 0.33 up-gradation /
11 155+200 Slab 1x0.60 0.6 9.92 0.568 replacement shall be
12 155+380 Slab 1x0.90 0.9 11.855 1.29 carried out on Finalised
13 156+050 Slab 1x 0.81 0.81 12 0.87 alignment under Up-
14 158+670 Slab 1x1.247 1.247 11.02 0.463 gradation of NH-80
15 158+750 Slab 1x0.623 0.623 11.921 0.725 Stretch (Munger -
Bhagalpur –
16 160+350 Slab 1x2.02 2.02 11.87 0.85
Mirzachauki section)
17 160+940 Slab 1x2.671 2.671 11.81 2.46
from km 65 to km 190.
18 160+960 Slab 2x2.65 2.65 7.82 2.257 DPR has been finalised
19 162+580 Slab 1x0.77 0.77 11.96 0.847 by SAI Consultants
20 163+060 Slab 1x2.84 2.84 12.01 2 under M/oRT&H for
21 163+720 Slab 1x2.98 2.98 11.92 1.488 up-gradation of
22 163+820 Slab 1x0.77 0.77 11.93 0.566 Highway.
23 165+230 Slab 1x4.92 4.92 7 0.585
24 165+800 Slab 1x0.62 0.62 11.58 0.048
Out of Total 24 Culverts condition of 7 Culverts is very alarming as they are badly damaged
due to Flood situation and breach in August 2016 and needs immediate replacement by New
Box Culvert as detailed in Table 1.9 below.
Table 1.9: Summary of Existing Culverts for Replacement

Under present proposal
Proposal New
Type of Structure
SL Span Length of Width of Vertical Culvert in
Location (Pipe, Slab Box,
No Arrangement Span Culvert Clearance replacement of
Arch)
Existing Culvert
1 139+080 HP 2x1 2.86 7 3.42 Box Culvert (4 x 4)
2 139+140 HP 1x1 1 20.7 1.15 Box Culvert (4 x 2)
3 139+550 New Proposed at Breach Location Box Culvert (6 x 3.5)
4 142+290 HP 2x1 2 20.2 1.06 Box Culvert (4 x 2)
5 147+050 Slab 1 x 2.75 2.75 8 4.38 Box Culvert (6 x 5)
6 148+330 Slab 1 x 1.9 2.1 9.75 1.4 Box Culvert (4 x 2)
7 149+140 Slab 1 x 0.55 0.55 1x1.85 2.98 Box Culvert (4 x 3.5)
8 163+720 Slab 1 x 2.98 2.98 11.92 1.488 Box Culvert (4 x 2)
9
1.4.7 Rain / Flood Water Overtopping in the project Stretch
Flood Over-topping is reported in the entire project Section between Chainage

136.000 to Chainage 166.000. Unexpected flood over topping in the project section
has been noted in last 30 years.
DPR for Up-gradation, Geometric improvement of NH-80 Stretch (Munger -

Bhagalpur – Mirzachauki section) from km 65 to km 190 has been finalised by SAI
Consultants under M/oRT&H. The up-gradation of NH-80 including its geometric
improvement, raising work, realignments shall be taken up by M/oRT&H as
separate project. Considering the facts, raising of project Highway has not been up
in this DPR and Cost Estimate for strengthening work
1.4.8 Utility Services

The Detailed field Survey has been done for locating the Utility services in the
project stretch. It was found that Electric Transformers, Electric Poles, Telephone
Poles, Optic Fiber Cables, Hand Pumps in the project section does not pose any
problem under strengthening work of existing stretch from Km. 136 to Km. 166.
1.5 Sub-grade Soil Investigation Report :

The Sub-grade Soil investigation work for each Km. has been carried out in July 2016.
Sample of sub-grade soil were collected after excavation of pit at pavement edge. The
summary of sub-grade soil Investigation Report is presented below for reference:
Table 1.10: Sub-grade Soil Investigation Data

Km./ Location Visual Sieve Analysis (% Passing) Sand Atterberg Limits Type of S. Proctor Test
C.B.R. Test Result
Chaina Classification Content soil
ge of soil as per OMC. Max. Without 4 days
IS (in %) Dry den. Soaking Soaking
Classifi (gm/cc)
4.75 2.36 0.425 0.075 LL PL PI cation 2.5 5.0 2.5 5.0
mm mm mm mm 1498 of mm mm mm mm
1970 Pen. Pen. Pen. Pen.
136.500 Right Brownish Silty 100 98.64 96.34 91.91 8.09 30.35 17.45 12.90 CL 16.25 1.73 6.85 7.10 5.35 5.81
Clay
138.500 Left Brownish Silty 100 99.06 96.2 90.24 9.76 30.75 18.85 11.90 CL 16.15 1.74 7.25 7.50 5.75 6.21
Clay
Clay
142.500 Right Yellowish Grey 100 99.96 95.57 90.55 9.45 31.45 16.25 15.20 CL 16.45 1.72 6.82 7.07 5.32 5.78
Silty Clay
144.750 Right Brownish Silty 100 99.96 97.07 89.65 10.35 29.65 15.65 14.00 CL 15.75 1.73 6.57 6.82 5.07 5.53
Clay
146.400 Left Yellowish Grey 100 99.96 96.3 84.20 15.8 30.25 15.85 14.40 CL 15.75 1.75 6.73 6.98 5.23 5.69
Silty Clay
148.500 Right Brownish Silty 98.63 98.26 96.12 92.98 5.65 32.25 18.15 14.10 CL 15.65 1.73 6.86 7.11 5.36 5.82
Clay
Clay
152.600 Right Dark Brown 100 98.09 95.2 90.20 9.8 32.45 17.65 14.80 CL 15.95 1.72 6.59 6.84 5.09 5.55
Silty Clay
10
Km./ Location Visual Sieve Analysis (% Passing) Sand Atterberg Limits Type of S. Proctor Test
C.B.R. Test Result
Chaina Classification Content soil
ge of soil as per OMC. Max. Without 4 days
IS (in %) Dry den. Soaking Soaking
Classifi (gm/cc)
4.75 2.36 0.425 0.075 LL PL PI cation 2.5 5.0 2.5 5.0
mm mm mm mm 1498 of mm mm mm mm
1970 Pen. Pen. Pen. Pen.
154.600 Left Grayish Silty 98.46 97.26 94.33 91.54 6.92 32.75 18.75 14.00 CL 16.45 1.67 6.86 7.11 5.36 5.82
Clay
156.500 Right Yellowish Grey 98.24 96.09 93.63 91.25 6.99 32.45 18.85 13.60 CL 16.35 1.68 6.74 6.99 5.24 5.70
Silty Clay
158.400 Left Brownish Silty 98.05 94.06 92.32 90.65 7.40 32.65 19.95 12.70 CL 16.25 1.69 6.95 7.20 5.45 5.91
Clay
160.300 Right Brownish Grey 99.84 97.65 94.31 90.80 9.04 30.25 19.85 10.40 CL 15.65 1.77 6.55 6.80 5.05 5.51
Silty Clay
Clay
164.500 Right Dark Brown Silty 100 95.31 92.05 90.28 9.72 30.95 19.95 11.00 CL 16.15 1.75 6.92 7.17 5.42 5.88
Clay
Clay
Note: Recommended CBR Value for Design of Road Crust = 5 %
1.6 Traffic count Data

7-Days Mid Block Traffic Count Survey has been carried out in Project section near Km. 134 near
Sabour in project section from 16th July to 22nd July 2016. Summary of Mid Block Count Traffic Data
is Presented below. From analysis of Traffic count, it has been found that the project section carriers
heterogeneous with total PCU of 28692.
Summary of 7 Days Mid Block Traffic Count Data – NH-80 (Near Sabour)
Name of Road: NH-80 From : 6.00 A.M. = On 16 July 2016
Road Classification : Intermediate / Two Lane To : 6.00 A.M. On : 22 July 2016
Location of Survey Station : At Ch. 137.250 Near Direction of Traffic : Up = To Kahalgaon
Sabour Down = To Baghalpur
FAST MOVING VEHICLES SLOW MOVING VEHICLES
Car, Bus Mini/ Motor Agri.T Total Fast Cycle Cycle Animal Drawn Hand Total Slow
Jeep, Midi Truck Cycle, rac. Moving Ricksha Vehicle Drawn Moving
Count Hour Van,Te Bus Scooter Trailer Vehicles w Vehicle Vehicles
Mini 2-Axle Multi-Axle Moped
mpo Truck Rigid
Agricul Rigid Semi Bullock Horse
tural Arti./
Tractor Articulat
ed
06AM - 08AM 114 48 58 147 181 285 66 312 84 1295 66 26 4 0 0 96
08AM - 10AM 141 27 52 168 213 308 84 336 96 1425 88 22 5 0 0 115
10AM - 12AM 123 24 48 138 235 263 72 248 82 1233 50 21 3 0 0 74
12AM - 02PM 156 21 42 165 190 248 81 216 74 1193 44 23 6 0 0 73
02PM - 04PM 132 18 66 183 217 233 64 262 88 1263 60 17 5 0 0 82
04PM - 06PM 168 24 48 144 210 285 61 312 86 1338 78 24 3 0 0 105
06PM - 08PM 108 42 38 96 231 255 58 152 52 1032 32 18 2 0 0 52
08PM - 10PM 78 51 16 63 193 165 53 112 40 772 20 0 0 0 0 20
10PM - 12PM 21 0 2 15 140 105 29 24 14 350 7 0 0 0 0 7
12PM - 02AM 6 0 0 6 68 45 14 8 6 154 3 0 0 0 0 3
02AM - 04AM 0 27 0 0 32 23 7 0 0 88 0 0 0 0 0 0
04AM - 06AM 66 54 32 81 238 120 36 144 42 813 22 11 5 0 0 38
11
FAST MOVING VEHICLES SLOW MOVING VEHICLES

Car, Bus Mini/ Motor Agri.T Total Fast Cycle Cycle Animal Drawn Hand Total Slow
Jeep, Midi Truck Cycle, rac. Moving Ricksha Vehicle Drawn Moving
Count Hour Van,Te Bus Scooter Trailer Vehicles w Vehicle Vehicles
Mini 2-Axle Multi-Axle Moped
mpo Truck Rigid
Agricul Rigid Semi Bullock Horse
tural Arti./
Tractor Articulat
ed
1113 336 402 1206 2150 2333 625 2126 664 10955 470 162 33 0 0 665
TOTAL
Total UP & DN 1113 336 402 1206 2150 2333 625 2126 664 10955 470 162 33 0 0 665
Per Veh. Type
Value of PCU / 1.00 3.00 3.00 1.50 3.00 4.50 4.50 0.50 3.00 0.50 1.50 8.00 4.00 8.00
Unit Vehicle
Value of PCU/ 1113 1008 1206 1809 6450 10496 2813 1063 1992 27950 235 243 264 0 0 742
Type of Vehicle
1.7 Proposed New Bridge at Ch. 142.700 in replacement of existing Arch Bridge
The existing narrow arch Bridge (7 x 4.60 = 33 m.) at Ch. 142.700 of NH-80 is found in
proposed to construct the New RCC High-level Bridge on existing Alignment after it’s
dismantling. Suitable Diversion Shall be constructed on right side of existing bridge for
smooth movement of Traffic during construction of New Bridge.
The over-all formation width of Proposed Bridge has been kept 16.00 m. as per
Guidelines of IRC SP-73. Based on Hydraulic Particular, the proposed Span
arrangement of New Bridge has been kept 3 x 14.00 m. RCC T-Beam Girder + Slab
Bridge resting on Pile Foundation of 1.2 m. dia.
1.8 Land Acquisition Work
The available Land width at Proper Bridge Site is only 7 m.. For construction of New
Bridge with Formation width of 16 m. extra 13 m. Wide Land strip is required. The
Highway formation in immediate approaches either side of Bridge in a Length of 100
m. requires Land Acquisition Work in additional width of 10-12 m.. Total Land
Acquisition work involved in the Project is approx. 40 Dec. and Cost of Land
Acquisition work for proposed Bridge & Approaches in Km. 143 works out to Rs.
85,465,575/- as per prevelling rate of compensation fixed by Govt. of Bihar (4 times the
Circle Rate of Land + 12% Interest + 20 contingency + Rs. 5.00 Lakhs). The process of
Land Acquisition work has already been started by N.H. Division, Bhagalpur.
1.9 Materials for proposed Construction work:
Coarse & Fine aggregate will be procured form nearest approved quarry as given below.
S. No. Type of material Unit Name of Quarry Carriage Lead

In Km.
1 Stone Boulders cum Mirzachowki 42
2 Stone Metal cum Mirzachowki 42
3 Stone Chips cum Mirzachowki 42
12
S. No. Type of material Unit Name of Quarry Carriage Lead

In Km.
4 Sand cum Sanhaula 23
5 Local Sand cum Local 3
6 Steel (TMT Bars) MT Bhagalpur 25
7 Cement MT Bhagalpur 25
8 Bitumen (Packed) MT Barauni 153
9 Bitumen (Emulsion) MT Patna 253
10 Bitumen (CRMB) MT Patna 253
11 Stone Aggregate cum Mirzachowki 42
as a GSB
12 Brick No Local 8
13 Hume Pipe m. Godda 95
1.9 Specification & Test Result
The specification and test result for stone metal, stone chips and other materials involved in
construction work shall be as per guidelines laid down in the I.R.C. special publication
“Specification for Road & Bridge works” latest 5th Revision 2013.
1.10 Labour
Skilled & unskilled labour for carrying out different items of works involved in proposed
construction is locally available. Other facilities such as transport, food, water & medical care
are easily available to them.
1.11 Rates
The finished rates for carrying out different items of works has been worked out on the basis of
“Current Schedules of Rates” of National Highway Wing, Bihar, effective from 01.04.2016 /
22-09-2016.
1.12 Project Cost Estimate
Detailed Cost Estimate for proposed Strengthening work of existing intermediate / Two Lane
NH - 80 Stretch Km. 136 to Km. 166 Sabour – Ramjanipur section in the State of Bihar has
been worked out based on detailed quantity computation as per finalised Design and Drawings
under DPR.
Unit rates for construction items have been analyzed on the basis of the formats given in the
standard Data Book for Analysis of Rates published in the year 2003 by Indian Roads Congress
on behalf of Ministry of Surface Transport, Road Wing, Govt. of India, New Delhi.
Current Schedule of Rates of RCD, Govt. of Bihar, effective from 01.04.2016 has been taken
under consideration and cost estimate has been finalised. Local quarries for stones and stone
aggregate for construction of road crust and bridge are available in the near vicinity. Stone
quarries at Mirzachauki have been proposed for carrying out the entire work. Sand from
Sanhaula River is available in the near vicinity. Cement & Steel required in construction work
shall be procured from Bhagalpur Town in the Project Section. Hume Pipe Factories has been
located at Godda (Jharkhand).
Based on quantity Computation and Analysis of Rates the Detailed Cost Estimate have been
arrived and abstract of Cost presented in Table Below
13
Strengthening work of National Highway 80 from Km. 136 to Km. 166 Sabour –
Ramjanipur Section including replacement of one Minor Damaged Arch Bridge
in Km. 143 Bridge in the state of Bihar
General Abstract of Cost
Total Cost
Sl. No. Description
(Rupees in Figures)
A. Cost of Civil Construction Work
1 Site Clearance and Dismantling 16,996,045
2 Earth Work 66,548,701
3 Grannular Sub bases and Base course 94,323,040
4 Concrete Pavement 260,839,740
5 Proposed Box Culverts 36,637,037
6 Construction of Proposed Bridge in Km. 143 Bridge 41,241,422
7 Drainage & Protective Work (Total Built-up Length =14.40 Km.) 185,546,891
8 Traffic Signs, Marking, Road Appurtenances 10,317,348
Sub-Total "A" 712,450,224
9 Add 2.8% As Contingency on "A" 19,948,606
Sub-Total "B" 732,398,830
10 Add 1.5% for Work Charge Establishment on "B" 10,985,982
11 Add 1% for Quality Control on "B" 7,323,988
12 Adding Labour Cess @1% on B 7,323,988
13 Add 9% for Agency Charge on "B" 65,915,895
14 Cost of Land Acquisition work for proposed Bridge & 8,450,600
Approaches in Km. 143 = Total area of Land Acquisition = 40
decimal. Cost of Land Acquisition as per present Rule
15 Cost of Survey/Investigation and DPR Preparation Payable to 1,750,000
Consultants appointed for this Project
Grand Total Cost in Rs. 834,149,284
Say Rs. 83.415 crores
The item wise Detailed Cost Estimate is presented in Chapter-3 of this DPR.
1.13 Construction Programme:

Year Cumulative Physical (%) Progress Financial (%)
2016-2017 20% 20%
2017-2018 100% 100%
1.14 Drawings:
The following drawings has been attached here with:
Drawings Details: No. of sheets
Typical Cross Sections and other Miscellaneous Drawing 10
Detailed Drawings for Proposed New Bridge in Km. 143 13
Junior Engineer Assistant Engineer Executive Engineer

N.H. Section N.H. Sub-Division N.H. Division
Bhagalpur
14
2. Improvement Proposals and

Design
15
2. IMPROVEMENT PROPOSALS AND DESIGN
Contents
I. Design and Improvement Proposals for Highways
2.1 General
2.2 Cross-Sectional Elements
2.3 Proposed strengthening Scheme of NH-80

2.4 Other Improvement and Safety provisions in project Section
II. Design and Improvement Proposals for Bridges and Culverts

2.5 Bridges
2.6 Culverts
III. Proposed Pavement under strengthening work
2.7 Existing Road Crust Details

2.8 Existing Pavement Condition
2.9 Design of Crust (Strengthening) Overlay Flexible Pavement
2.10 Recommended Crust Thickness and overlay for adoption under proposed
strengthening work of NH-80
16
2. Engineering Design and Improvement Proposals
II. Design and Improvement Proposals for Highways
2.1 General
Ramjanipur) has been badly damaged due to flood over-topping and breach at
several locations. The Existing Bituminous pavement is badly damaged during
the Rainy season of August 2016. Immediate restoration and strengthening
work of project section becomes essential in view of present damage due to
Rains and Flooding.
DPR for Up-gradation, Geometric improvement of NH-80 Stretch (Munger -

Bhagalpur – Mirzachauki section) from km 65 to km 190 has been finalised by
SAI Consultants under M/oRT&H. The up-gradation of NH-80 including its
geometric improvement, raising work, realignments shall be taken up by
M/oRT&H as separate project.
Considering the facts, only strengthening work of existing highway without

rising of project Highway has not been up in this DPR and Cost Estimate for
strengthening work
2.2 Cross-Sectional Elements

Considering the available carriageway, Built-up Section in the Project stretch, Four
type of typical cross section have been developed for the Strengthening work of NH-
80 from Ch. 135.000 to Ch. 166.000. The details of these cross section are as follow:
i) Type 1
This cross section is applicable for 7.00 m. wide Carriageway Section passing
through Rural Area. Under this proposal the existing Two Lane Highway has been
strengthen with Bituminous overlay as per design done based on recommended
CBR and IRC 37-2012.
Formation Width
12000
Earthen Earthen
Shoulder Existing Carriageway Shoulder
2500 7000 2500
Selected Earth
£ Selected Earth
3.0 % 2.5 % 2.5 % 3.0 %
2 2
1 1
Earth Work Existing crust Earth Work

G.L BC = 40 mm. G.L
DBM = 120 mm.
WMM = 200 mm.

GSB for Levelling & Pot Filling 20%
Typical Cross Section (Type-1)
17
ii) Type 2
through Rural Area. Under this proposal the existing Two Lane Highway has been
strengthen with Bituminous overlay as per design done based on recommended
CBR and IRC 37-2012.
Existing Carriageway
Formation Width
12000
Earthen Earthen
Shoulder Shoulder
3250 5500 3250
£
Selected Earth
3.0 % 2.5 % 2.5 % 3.0 %
2 2
1 1
Earth Work Existing crust Earth Work

G.L BC = 40 mm. G.L
DBM = 120 mm.
WMM = 200 mm.

GSB for Levelling & Pot Filling 20%
Typical Cross Section (Type-2)
iii) Type-3
through Built-up Section. Under this proposal the existing Two Lane Highway has
been strengthen with Bituminous overlay as per design done based on
recommended CBR and IRC 37-2012. Road Side RCC Drain cum Footpath also
proposed in the Project section.
D ra in w ith E a rth e n E a rth e n D ra in w ith
F o o tp a th s h o u ld e r s e d C a rria g e w a y
P ro p o se s h o u ld e r F o o tp a th
1500 2500 7000 2500 1500
S e le c te d E a rth £ S e le c te d E a rth
2 .5 % 2 .5 %
Built-up Zone
Built-up Zone
3 .0 % 3 .0 %
E xistin g R o a d C ru s t
BC = 40 m m . W e e p h o le s
D BM = 120 m m .
W M M = 200 m m .
G S B fo r L e v e llin g & P o t F illin g 2 0 %
T y p ic a l C ro s s S e c tio n (T y p e -3 )
iv) Type-4
through Built-up Section. Under this proposal the existing Two Lane Highway has
been strengthen with Bituminous overlay as per design done based on
recommended CBR and IRC 37-2012. Road Side RCC Drain cum Footpath also
proposed in the Project section.
D ra in w ith E a rth e n E a rth e n D ra in w ith
F o o tp a th s h o u ld e r P ro p o s e d C a rria g e w a y s h o u ld e r F o o tp a th
1500 3250 5500 3250 1500
S e le c te d E a rth £ S e le c te d E a rth
2 .5 % 2 .5 %
Built-up Zone
Built-up Zone
3 .0 % 3 .0 %
E x is tin g R o a d C ru s t
BC = 40 m m . W e e p h o le s
D BM = 120 m m .
W M M = 200 m m .
G S B fo r L e v e llin g & P o t F illin g 2 0 %
T y p ic a l C ro s s S e c tio n (T y p e -4 )
18
2.3 Proposed Strengthening Scheme of NH-80
It has been proposed for Strengthening of existing Highway section with Cement
Concrete Pavement as per design. In the Built-up Zone existing Highway has been
strengthen to Two-lane with paved Shoulder configuration with Provision of Cement
concrete Pavement and Road Side RCC Drain cum Footpath.
Table – 2.1: Proposed improvement proposal

Sl. C/S Type Chainage Length in Land Existing Proposed Strengthening
No. m. Use Carriageway with
From To Width (m)
1 Type-3 135.000 137.150 2150.000 Built-Up 7.0 Bituminous Pavement
2 Type-1 137.150 137.600 450.000 Open 7.0 Bituminous Pavement
6 Type-4 139.600 140.100 500.000 Built-up 5.5 Bituminous Pavement
8 Type-4 142.850 144.450 1600.000 Built-up 5.5 Bituminous Pavement
16 Type-1 152.225 152.800 575.000 Open 7 Bituminous Pavement
17 Type-3 152.800 153.025 225.000 Built-Up 7 Bituminous Pavement
19 Type-3 153.250 153.525 275.000 Built-Up 7 Bituminous Pavement
2.4 Other Improvement and Safety provisions in project Section
2.4.1 Road Side Drainage Facilities

Out of total 31 Km. length of Project section, total 14.405 Km. length of highway is
passing through Built-up section. In these sections raised Roadside RCC (M-20
Grade) Drain as shown in Typical Cross section has been proposed at different
location The proposed drain Top (1.50 m. wide) will serve the purpose of Footpath,
The drain section has been adopted to take care of Pedestrian Live load.
Suitable opening with 150-mm. dia on side wall of drain shall be provided at an
interval of 7.5 m. for collecting/receiving the surface Run-off to Drain. Weep Holes
shall also be provided in Drain in Drain sidewalls. The inner bottom of drain in no
case shall be less than 0.40 m. below bottom of GSB level. For Inspection and
19
cleaning work of Drain, RCC Slab in Steel Angle Frame of Size 750 x 750 mm with
MS grating of dia 150 mm at center and hook for lifting shall be provided at regular
interval 10 m. throughout the length of drain.
125mm R.C.C SLAB (M-20)
1500
125mm R.C.C SLAB (M-20)
125
1500
G.L
125
RCC M-20 G.L
RCC M-20
1500 1000
R=50
125
R=50
75 THK.
125 P.C.C (1:3:6)
75 THK. 125 1250 125
P.C.C (1:3:6)
1650
125 1250 125
1650
R.C.C Covered Drain
R.C.C Covered Drain (Minimum Depth At Start)
(Maximum Depth at Disposal point)
2.4.2 Traffic Signs

Proper Traffic signs throughout the whole project stretch along with intersections
with other roads and other facility location will be provided for giving proper
direction and warning to the driver, as well as direct them the route they want to
follow. The traffic signs will be as per IRC Standard as will be of “Retro Reflection
Type”. The Summary of proposed traffic Signs in Project section is summarised
below:
A) Informatory Sign
i) Direction / advance Direction Sign (0.90 Sqm. Size) Nr. 32
ii) Route Marker signs (600 x 450) Nr. 32
B) Cautionary Signs Nr. 92
C) Mandatory signs
i) Stop sign (900 octagonal) Nr. 60
ii) Speed Limit sign, Overtaking prohibited (600 Dia) Nr. 90
2.4.3 Road Markings and Delineators

Road marking (Lane/centre line/edge line/ transverse marking /Zebra Crossing and
any other markings) shall be carried out with hot applied thermoplastic paints
conforming to ASTM D36/BS-3262 (Part - I) and as per IRC Standard.
For Safety of road user during night travel, retro-refectories road delineators have
been proposed at identified locations (Approach to Bridge, culverts & structure, speed
restricted section, curved sections, built-up section etc. in the project section. The
summary of such provision is presented below.
Cluster of Red Reflectors. 460

Road way delineators 300
Hazard markers 165
Object markers 145
Apart from above, for all the trees on highway flanks, retro-refectories plates marking
have been proposed for their clear identification during night travel.
20
III. Design and Improvement Proposals for Bridges and Culverts

2.5 Bridges
There are 4 Major Bridge and 6 Nos. of Minor Bridges Falls in the Project Section.
The details of Existing bridges is presented in table below:
Table: 2.2 Details of Major Bridges in the Project Section
Span Vertical
Sl Type of Length of Width of Bridge
Chainage Arrangemen Clearanc
No Bridge Bridge Bridge Condition
t e
1 146+050 PSC Girder 3 x 31.56 4.8 94.5 7.4 Good
2 154+060 PSC Girder 3 x 30 5.2 94.2 11.8 Good
3 154+470 Steel Truss 8 x 18.30 4.3 146.7 7.13 Good
PSC+RCC 3 x 31 + 1 x
4 157+990 5.3 115.2 7.45 Good
Girder 21
Table: 2.3 Details of Minor Bridges in the Project Section

Width
Type of Length of Vertical Bridge
Sl No Chainage of
Bridge Bridge Clearance Condition
Bridge
Poor, Damaged
1 142+710 Arch 32.240 7.400 2.700 & proposed for
Replacement
2 150+160 Slab 10.620 12.040 2.970 Good
3 152+460 Slab 17.500 11.200 4.200 Good
4 152+730 Slab 57.210 12.200 4.150 Good
5 158+170 Slab 11.100 7.410 2.873 Good
6 164+090 Box 17.260 7.200 1.233 Good
The existing narrow arch Bridge (7 x 4.60 = 33 m.) at Ch. 142.700 of NH-80 is found
in damaged condition. Replacement of the existing Arch Bridge by New RCC High-
level Bridge is essential. Considering the available ROW in the project section, it has
been proposed to construct the New RCC High-level Bridge on existing Alignment
after it’s dismantling. Suitable Diversion Shall be constructed on right side of existing
bridge for smooth movement of Traffic during construction of New Bridge.
Guidelines of IRC SP-73-2015. Based on Hydraulic Particular, the proposed Span
Bridge resting on Pile Foundation of 1.2 m. dia. The Detailed Report on Existing
Bridge/Bridge Design / Hydraulic Particular / Sub-Soil Investigation Report is
enclosed in Chapter -6
2.5.1 Design Parameter of Proposed Bridge in Km. 143
Cross Section
3 – lane RCC High Level Bridge of overall Formation width 16.00 m. as per
Guidelines of IRC SP-73-2015 and IRC:5-2015
21
Superstructure
Simply supported RCC T-Beam Girder & RCC Slab with Span arrangement of 3 x
14.00 m. has been proposed.
Substructure
RCC Solid wall Abutment and Solid wall type piers has been proposed.
Foundation
Bored cast in situ piles of dia 1200 mm. are proposed for the foundation of the
abutment and the piers. A pile capacity for abutment and pier has been marked in
enclosed respective working Drawing.
Bearing
Elastomeric Bearing as per Standard Drawing no.-SD/203 shall be adopted.
Expansion joints
Expansion Joints Shall be strip seal type from approved supplier.
Footpath Railing
Railing on footpath side shall be as per Standard Drawing no.-SD/202n with minor
modification to incorporate IRC:5-2015
2.5.2 Design Consideration:
The bridge has been designed for three lane as the carriageway width is 11.00m
which is more than 9.6m as per table no.-2 of IRC-6
Loads and load combination

Design Loading
Design loading is in according to the IRC-6 having most critical combination of
various load, forces and stresses. Dead load in the various member of the bridge shall
be as per the IRC codes.
• One Lane of 70R with one lane of Class-A Load
• Three Lane of Class-A
• Footpath Live Load shall be as per IRC-6
Apart from the dead load & Live Load Wind Load and Earthquake Forces has also be
taken into account. Impact, tractive and breaking forces has also considered as per the
provision of IRC-6.
Code \ Specification
Standard Specification and code of practice for road bridges of IRC wherever
applicable are followed. Following codes have been generally followed:
IRC-5 : General Features of Design
IRC-6 : Load and Stresses
IRC-78 : Foundation and Sub-Structures
IRC-112 : Reinforced Cement Concrete Bridge
IRC-83 (Part-II) : Elastomeric Bearing
IRC : Standard Specification for Road and Bridge Works
IS-1893 : Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures
IS-2911 (Part-1/Sec-2) : Design & Construction of Pile Foundation
22
Grade of Concrete Proposed:

Super-structures ………………….: RCC M-30
Sub-structures
Abutment & Pier : RCC M-30
Foundations
Pile & Pile Cap : RCC M-35
2.6 Culverts
Total 24 nos. of Culverts (HP, Slab, Slab & Box) has been identified in the project
section. Summary and condition of Existing Culverts is presented below in the table
2.4
Table 2.4 : Summary and condition of Existing Culverts
Type of
SL Structure Span Length Width of Vertical
Location Condition
No (Pipe, Slab Arrangement of Span Culvert Clearance
Box, Arch)
1 135+140 HP 1x1 1 12.1 0.65 Out of Total 24 Culverts
2 136+030 HP 1x1 1 12.1 1.12 condition of 7 Culverts
3 139+080 HP 2x1 2.86 7 3.42 are very alarming and
4 139+140 HP 1x1 1 20.7 1.15 needs immediate
5 142+290 HP 2x1 2 20.2 1.06 replacement by New
6 145+810 HP 1 x 1.00 1.0 12.15 1.05 Box Culvert as detailed
7 147+050 Slab 1x2.75 2.75 8 4.38 in Table 1.9 below.
8 148+330 Slab 1x5.70 5.7 9.75 1.4
9 149+140 Slab 1x0.55 0.55 1x1.85 2.98 For remaining culverts
10 149+820 Slab 1x0.92 0.92 12.3 0.33 up-gradation /
11 155+200 Slab 1x0.60 0.6 9.92 0.568 replacement shall be
12 155+380 Slab 1x0.90 0.9 11.855 1.29 carried out on Finalised
13 156+050 Slab 1x 0.81 0.81 12 0.87 alignment under Up-
14 158+670 Slab 1x1.247 1.247 11.02 0.463 gradation of NH-80
15 158+750 Slab 1x0.623 0.623 11.921 0.725 Stretch (Munger -
Bhagalpur –
16 160+350 Slab 1x2.02 2.02 11.87 0.85
Mirzachauki section)
17 160+940 Slab 1x2.671 2.671 11.81 2.46 from km 65 to km 190.
18 160+960 Slab 2x2.65 2.65 7.82 2.257 DPR has been finalised
19 162+580 Slab 1x0.77 0.77 11.96 0.847 by SAI Consultants
20 163+060 Slab 1x2.84 2.84 12.01 2 under M/oRT&H for
21 163+720 Slab 1x2.98 2.98 11.92 1.488 up-gradation of
22 163+820 Slab 1x0.77 0.77 11.93 0.566 Highway.
23 165+230 Slab 1x4.92 4.92 7 0.585
24 165+800 Slab 1x0.62 0.62 11.58 0.048
Out of Total 24 Culverts condition of 7 Culverts is very alarming as they are badly
damaged due to Flood situation and breach in August 2016 and needs immediate
replacement by New Box Culvert as detailed in Table 2.5 below.
Table 2.5 : Summary of Existing Culverts for Replacement

under present proposal
Proposal New
Type of Structure
Arch)
Existing Culvert
1 139+080 HP 2x1 2.86 7 3.42 Box Culvert (4 x 4)
2 139+140 HP 1x1 1 20.7 1.15 Box Culvert (4 x 2)
23
Proposal New
Type of Structure
Arch)
Existing Culvert
3 139+550 New Proposed at Breach Location Box Culvert (6 x 3.5)
4 142+290 HP 2x1 2 20.2 1.06 Box Culvert (4 x 2)
5 147+050 Slab 1x2.75 2.75 8 4.38 Box Culvert (6 x 5)
6 148+330 Slab 1x1.9 2.1 9.75 1.4 Box Culvert (4 x 2)
7 149+140 Slab 1x0.55 0.55 1x1.85 2.98 Box Culvert (4 x 3.5)
8 163+720 Slab 1x2.98 2.98 11.92 1.488 Box Culvert (4 x 2)
III. Proposed Pavement under strengthening work
2.7 Existing Road Crust and Pavement Condition
The existing Road Crust in Project Section in Project Section is presented in Table
below
Summary of Existing Road Crust in Project Section
Sl. From Length
No. (Km) (m)
1 135 136 1000 7 330 65 395
2 136 137 1000 7 325 75 400
3 137 138 1000 7 310 60 370
4 138 139 1000 5.5 315 72 387
5 139 140 1000 5.5 325 82 407
6 140 141 1000 5.5 330 84 414
7 141 142 1000 5.5 325 78 403
8 142 143 1000 5.5 310 76 386
9 143 144 1000 5.5 340 77 417
10 144 145 1000 5.5 315 72 387
11 145 146 1000 5.5 330 70 400
12 146 147 1000 5.5 340 68 408
13 147 148 1000 5.5 320 64 384
14 148 149 1000 5.5 325 74 399
15 149 150 1000 5.5 330 68 398
16 150 151 1000 5.5 335 73 408
17 151 152 1000 5.5 340 69 409
18 152 153 1000 5.5 330 76 406
19 153 154 1000 6.7 325 82 407
20 154 155 1000 6.7 315 84 399
21 155 156 1000 7 325 79 404
22 156 157 1000 7 335 68 403
23 157 158 1000 7 320 66 386
24 158 159 1000 7 330 68 398
25 159 160 1000 7 335 73 408
26 160 161 1000 7 320 77 397
27 161 162 1000 7 315 79 394
28 162 163 1000 7 320 71 391
29 163 164 1000 7 330 68 398
30 164 165 1000 7 330 65 395
31 165 166 1000 7 320 73 393
Average Crust Thickness 398 mm.
24
2.8 Pavement Condition
Ramjanipur) has been badly damaged due to flood over-topping and breach at
several locations. The Existing Bituminous pavement is badly damaged during
the Rainy season of August. Immediate restoration and strengthening work of
project section becomes essential in view of present damage due to Rains and
Flooding.
The Km. wise summary of existing pavement condition is presented in Table below.
Summary Pavement Condition
Sl No From To Length Existing Pavement Remarks
(Km) (Km) (m) Condition
1 135 136 1000 Poor Pot holes, Alligator Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks ,
2 136 137 1000 Poor Loss of Aggregates and Hungry Surfaces
3 137 138 1000 Poor Alligator Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks, Loss of
4 138 138.15 150 Poor Aggregates and Hungry Surfaces have been noticed
5 138.15 139.6 1450 Extremely Poor The Road has been breached at some locations by
nearby water logged area . Except that Edge
failures, Slope failure, loss of aggregates and big
pot holes
6 139.6 142 2400 Poor Disintegration, Pot holes, Alligator Cracks, Rutting,
7 142 142.25 250 Poor Edge cracks Loss of Aggregates and Hungry
Surfaces
8 142.25 142.35 100 Extremely Poor The Road has been breached at the locations by
nearby defined streamline. Except that Edge
failures, Slope failure, loss of aggregates a have
been noticed
9 142.35 143 650 Poor
Big Pot holes, Alligator Cracks, , Loss of
10 143 144 1000 Poor
Aggregates, Rutting, Disintegration of aggregates,
11 144 145 1000 Poor
Hungry Surfaces and water logging in the
12 145 146 1000 Poor carriageway
13 146 146.1 100 Poor Alligator Cracks, Loss of Aggregates,
Disintegration of aggregates
14 14.1 141.25 127150 Extremely Poor Crust has been completely uprooted in the
carriageway
15 146.25 147 750 Extremely Poor

Pot holes, Alligator Cracks, , Loss of Aggregates,
17 147.6 148 400 Extremely Poor Rutting, Disintegration of aggregates, Hungry
18 148 148.15 150 Extremely Poor Surfaces and water logging in the carriageway
19 148.15 149 850 Extremely Poor have been noticed. In some sections the surface
20 149 150 1000 Extremely Poor course has been completely uprooted
24 152.15 152.85 700 Poor Alligator Cracks, Loss of Aggregates,
Disintegration of aggregates
25 152.85 153 150 Extremely Poor In most of the section surface course have been
26 153 153.9 900 Extremely Poor completely uprooted. Presence of WMM in surface
is prominent and water logging has been noticed.
At some places surface course with big pot holes,
cracks, alligator cracks and disintegration of
aggregate
27 153.9 154 100 Poor Surface course is damaged, Pot holes, alligator
28 154 155 1000 Extremely Poor cracks, Longitudinal cracks, Edge cracks, Ravelling
29 155 156 1000 Poor Pot Holes, Longitudinal Cracks , Alligator Cracks
30 156 157 1000 Poor and Ravelling
25
Sl No From To Length Existing Pavement Remarks

(Km) (Km) (m) Condition
31 157 158 1000 Poor
32 158 159 1000 Poor Big Pot Holes , Longitudinal Cracks , Alligator
Cracks and Ravelling have been noticed. At the pot
holes water logging
32 159 159.7 700 Extremely Poor Big pot holes, Alligator Cracks , Ravelling have
been noticed . In most of the section right side
pavement have been completely failed and WMM
is noticed there
33 159.7 160 300 Poor Alligator Cracks , Edge cracks , longitudinal
34 160 161 1000 Poor cracks, hairline cracks and small pot holes (at some
35 161 162 1000 Poor points)
36 162 163 1000 Extremely Poor Big potholes, Alligator Cracks, Loss of Aggregates,
37 163 164 1000 Extremely Poor Rutting, Disintegration of aggregates, Hungry
37 164 165 1000 Extremely Poor Surfaces Ravelling have been noticed. Water
165 166 1000 Extremely Poor logging at the pot holes
In view of damaged condition of existing road, Design of strengthening over lay as

per IRC 81 (Benkelman Beam Deflection Test) is not possible. CBR of Sub-grade
soil has been considered for design of Pavement (Strengthening layer) as per IRC-37
–2012. The existing avg. Crust Thickness in available in the Project is only 400 mm.
out of which around 100 mm. top pavement layer is mostly damaged due to Rains and
Flooding in August 2016. Effective available thickness of road crust has been taken
as 350 mm. for design of Strengthening Overlay as per IRC-37 –2012
2.9 Design of Crust (Strengthening) Overlay Flexible Pavement
• Design Life: The design life has been adopted as 15 years as recommended by
IRC-37-2012, vide clause 4.3.2. However, considering the separate proposal
under finalisation in M/oRT&H for up-gradation of NH-80, the design of
overlay has been done for 10 years period only for existing NH-80 Section.
After 10 years period, further strengthening layer making up the short falls in
pavement thickness along with a profile corrective course after evaluation of
structural strength by non-destruction test, will be provided.
• Sub Grade: Since the present case is Strengthening of existing pavement. The
sub-Grade soil sample below of existing Pavement has been collected and CBR
data obtained after field and laboratory test on Soil. As per test results, the Sub
grade soils along the existing alignment from Km. 136 to Km. 166 are shows
similar character and are mostly Brownish Grey Silty Clay. The CBR values
ranging between 5.10 to 5.90. The recommended Design CBR (soaked) for
road section has been taken 5%.
• Design Traffic: Design Traffic for Project Section has been taken as 5444
commercial Vehicle per day and Average vehicle damage factor of 4.5 has been
adopted as per guidelines of IRC 37-2012.
• Computation of Design Traffic: The design traffic is considered in terms of

the cumulative number of standard axles to be carried during the design life of
the road. This has been computed as per Clause 4.6 of IRC-37-2012 using the
following equation: -
N = 365 x [ ( 1+ r ) ^n – 1 ] x A x D x F
r
26
where ,
N = The cumulative number of standard axles to be catered for in the design in
terms of MSA
A = Initial traffic in the year of completion of construction in terms of
commercial vehicle per day
D = Lane distribtn. factor (para 4.5.1 of IRC:37-2012 2-lane single
carriageway) = 0.50
F = Vehicle damage factor =4.5
n = Design life in year
r = Annual growth rate of commercial vehicle
The traffic in the year of completion is estimated using the following formula:-
A = P ( 1 + r ) ^x
Where,
P = Number of commercial vehicles as per last count
x = Number of years between the last count and the year of completion of
construction
r = Annual growth rate of commercial vehicle
Design Thickness of Pavement Layers : Based upon design CBR values

obtained from soil tests of existing sub-grade soil and design traffic in msa, the
thickness of component layers of the pavement has been obtained from the
corresponding thickness design chart in IRC: 37 – 2012.
Design of Flexible Pavement overlay :
Based on the Traffic data, Existing Road Crust data, Pavement Condition Data, CBR
test result and Axle Load test data, Road Section Wise design of pavement have been
carried out and presented below with recommendation for adoption:
A. Design of Flexible Pavement (IRC-37-2012) with recommended

CBR value of Sub-grade = 5 %
Input Data:
Initial Traffic in both direction on counting year = 5444 CV/day
Construction period since last traffic count = 1 Years
Design Life of pavement to be considered = 10 Years
Design CBR of sub grade soil to be employed = 5 %
Traffic growth rate = 5 %
Vehicle damage factor as per axle load survey = 4.5
Lane Distribution factor = 0.50
Directional Distribution factor = 1
Design Calculation:
Initial Traffic in each direction in the year of completion of construction
A=P(1+r)x
Where,
P= Number of commercial vehicles as per last count
r= Annual growth rate of commercial vehicles
x=Construction period since last traffic count
A = 5444 X(1+7.5/100)^1 = 5716 CV/day
Cumulative number of standard axle to be carried during design life in msa
365 x [(1+r)n -1]
27
N = xAxDxF
r
Where, A= Initial traffic in the year of completion of construction
D= Lane distribution factor
F= Vehicle damage factor
n= Design life in years
r= Annual growth rate
N = 365x((1+5.0/100)^10-1) x 5716 x 0.50 x 1 x 4.5/ (5/100)/1000000
N= 59.04 msa Say 60 msa
Pavement thickness and composition (Refer IRC-37-2012, Plate-3 Page No.-26)

Total Pavement thickness for Traffic 60 MSA and CBR of 5 % = 710 mm.
Thickness of the component layers are :
Provisions made to the Layers & Thk.
BC= 40 mm.
DBM= 120 mm.
WMM 1st Layer= 125 mm
WMM 2nd Layer= 125 mm
GSB 1st Layer= 100 mm
GSB Drainage Layer= 200 mm
Total= 710 mm
2.10 Recommended Crust Thickness and overlay for adoption under proposed
strengthening work of NH-80
Considering the Existing available Road Crust 350 mm. in the project section
as Sub-Base Layer. Then the Proposed Strengthening overlay in the Project
section will be 710 mm. – 350 mm. (existing) = 360 mm.
BC 40 mm. Wearing course layer.

DBM 120 mm. Strengthening Layer
WMM 200 mm Strengthening cum Profile Correction Layer
GSB 150mm. 20% Pot Filling and Profile Correction Layer
Based of proposed improvement proposal the detailed Drawings for

proposed improvement has been finalised and Quantity Computation work
has been carried out and detailed Cost estimate have been prepared. The
Detailed Cost Estimate of Project is presented in Chapter-3.
28
3. General Abstract of Cost and

Detailed abstract of Cost
29
Strengthening work of National Highway 80 from Km. 136 to Km. 166 Sabour –
Ramjanipur Section including replacement of one Minor Damaged Arch Bridge
in Km. 143 Bridge in the state of Bihar
General Abstract of Cost
Total Bid Prices
Sl. No. Description
(Rupees in Figures)
A. Cost of Civil Construction Work
1 Site Clearance and Dismantling 16,996,045
2 Earth Work 66,548,701
3 Grannular Sub bases and Base course 94,323,040
4 Concrete Pavement 260,839,740
5 Proposed Box Culverts 36,637,037
6 Construction of Proposed Bridge in Km. 143 Bridge 41,241,422
7 Drainage & Protective Work (Total Built-up Length =14.40 Km.) 185,546,891
8 Traffic Signs, Marking, Road Appurtenances 10,317,348
Sub-Total "A" 712,450,224
9 Add 2.8% As Contingency on "A" 19,948,606
Sub-Total "B" 732,398,830
10 Add 1.5% for Work Charge Establishment on "B" 10,985,982
11 Add 1% for Quality Control on "B" 7,323,988
12 Adding Labour Cess @1% on B 7,323,988
13 Add 9% for Agency Charge on "B" 65,915,895
14 Cost of Land Acquisition work for proposed Bridge & 8,450,600
Approaches in Km. 143 = Total area of Land Acquisition = 40
decimal. Cost of Land Acquisition as per present Rule
15 Cost of Survey/Investigation and DPR Preparation Payable to 1,750,000
Consultants appointed for this Project
Grand Total Cost in Rs. 834,149,284
Say Rs. 83.415 crores
Junior Engineer Assistant Engineer Executive Engineer

N.H. Section N.H. Sub-Division N.H. Division
Bhagalpur
Superintending Engineer
N.H. Circle
Baghalpur
30
Strengthening work of National Highway 80 from Km. 136 to Km. 166 Sabour – Ramjanipur Section including replacement of one Minor
Damaged Arch Bridge in Km. 143 Bridge in the State of Bihar.
Bill No.-1 : SITE CLEARANCE AND DISMANTLING
Estimated Unit Rate (Rs.)
Item Description Unit Amount in Rs.
Quantity In Figure In Words
1.01 Dismantling of existing structures like culverts, bridges, retaining walls
and other structure comprising of masonry, cement concrete, wood work,
steel work, including T&P and scaffolding wherever necessary, sorting the
dismantled material, disposal of unserviceable material and stacking the
serviceable material with all lifts and lead of 1000 metres as per MoRTH
Technical Specifications Clause 202.
(i) Brick /Stone Masonry (Widening & Reconstruction of Culverts, cum
785.00 280.00 219,800.00
Bridges, Drains etc.)
(ii) Apron/Stone Pitching cum 80.00 207.00 16,560.00
(iii) Plain Concrete/reinforced cement concrete structures including
cleaning, straightening & cutting of bars and separating them out
from RCC/PCC
a) PCC (Drains, Culverts/Bridges Abutments/Piers & Wing Wall) cum 540.00 500.00 270,000.00
(iv) Removing Hume Pipe (600 to 900 mm. dia.) Lm 65.00 183.00 11,895.00
1.02 Dismantling of flexible pavements and disposal of dismantled materials up
to a lead of 1000 metres, stacking serviceable and unserviceable materials
separately as per MoRTH Technical Specifications Clause 202.
(a) Bituminous courses cum 17,360.00 607.00 10,537,520.00

(b) Granular courses cum 13,230.00 449.00 5,940,270.00
Total Amount for Bill No. 1 16,996,045.00
31
Bill No. 2 : EARTH WORK
2.01 Earthwork in excavation necessary for construction of roadway and
drainage including dressing, trimming and compacting the cut
formation in accordance with requirements of lines, grades and
cross fall complete as per Technical Specifications Clause 301 and
disposal of all cut material including necessary stacking of suitable
material with all lifts and leads.
(a) All types of soils including marshy soil and ordinary rock cum 111600 97.74 10907372
2.02 Construction of embankment to achieve 12 m. formation width with
suitable Soil obtained from road cutting with all leads and lifts all
complete as per drawings and Tech. Specifications Clause 305. cum 89280 172.85 15432464
(80% of Excavated Earth)
2.03 Construction of embankment to achieve 12 m. formation width with
suitable earth obtained from and Borrow Area with all leads and
cum 150595 267.00 40208865
lifts all complete as per drawings and Tech. Specifications Clause
305.
Total Amount for Bill No. 2 66,548,701
32
Bill No. 3 GRANNULAR SUB BASES AND BASE COURSE
Unit Rate (Rs.)
Estimated
3.01 Providing, laying and compacting Granular Sub-base at OMC

below pavement including Drainage Layer complete as per cum 5,880 2068 12159840
Technical Specifications Clause 401 (Grading V Table 400-1)
3.02 Providing, laying, spreading and compacting Wet Mix Macadam

(WMM) base course complete as per Technical Specifications cum 39,200 2096 82163200
Clause 406.
Total Amount for Bill No. 3 94323040
33
Bill No. 4 : CONCRETE PAVEMENT
4.01 Providing and applying Bituminous Primer Coat with cut back bitumen of
MC-30 grade over granular surface with bituminous emulsion complete as
per drawing and Technical Specifications Clause 502 @ 7.50 kg per 10 sqm 196,000 29.10 5703600
sqm
4.02 Providing and applying tack coat over prepared surface with bituminous
emulsion complete as per Technical Specifications Clause 503.
(a) On granular surface treated with primer or dry and hungry
bituminous surface @ 2.75 kg per 10 sqm sqm 196,000 11.50 2254000
(b)
On normal bituminous surface @ 2.25 kg per 10 sqm sqm 196,000 9.78 1915900
4.03 Providing and laying 120 mm. thick Dense graded Bituminous Macadam
(DBM) using Modified Bitumen (Refinery Packed & produce) as per cum 23,520 7669.00 180374880
drawing and Technical Specifications Clauses 505 and 501
4.04 Providing and laying 40 mm. Thick Bituminous Concrete (BC) wearing
course using Modified Bitumen (Refinery Packed & produce) complete as cum 7,840 9004.00 70591360
per drawing and Technical Specifications Clauses 507
Total Amount for Bill No. 4 260839740.00
34
BILL No. 5 (Cost Estimate for Box culverts)

5.00 BOX CULVERT
Item Estimated Unit Rate (Rs.)
Description Unit Amount in Rs.
No. Quantity In Figure In Words
5.01 Earthwork in excavation for foundation of structures in all types of soil
including marshy soil and ordinary rock and setting out, construction of
shoring and bracing, removal of stumps, other deleterious matter, dressing of cum 6429.98 103.00 662288
sides and bottom with all leads and lifts all complete as per Drawing &
Technical Specifications Clause 304 and 2903.
5.02 Providing Back filling behind box structures, wing walls and return walls,
with selected imported granular material of approved quality including all
leads and lifts complete as per drawings and Technical Specification Clause cum 550.62 820.00 451511
305 and Clause 710.1.4 of IRC:78.
5.03 Providing Filter media behind box structures, wing walls and return walls
with well packed material to specified thickness with smaller size towards the
soil and bigger size towards the wall complete with all leads and lifts as per cum 768.00 1876.00 1440768
drawings and Technical Specification Section 2200, Clause 305, 309, 2504,
and Clause 710.1.4 of IRC:78.
5.04 Providing Plain Cement concrete M-15 Grade in foundation below head wall,
Bed protection, Cut-off wall and levelling course for culverts including
centering and shuttering all complete as per drawing and Technical cum 1316.99 5181.00 6823312
Specifications Sections 1500, 1700 and 2100.
5.05 Providing and laying Cement Concrete / Reinforced Cement Concrete in M-
20 Grade in Foundation, Sub-structure of Abutment, Wing Wall, Head wall,
Curtain Wall, floor apron, leveling course including centering and shuttering cum 1588.06 5843.00 9279009
but excluding reinforcement all complete as per drawings and Technical
Specification Sections 1500, 1700 and 2100.
35
5.00 BOX CULVERT

5.06 Providing Reinforced cement concrete (M-30 grade) in Box Culvert
including centering and shuttering but excluding reinforcement all complete
as per drawing and Technical Specifications Sections 1500, 1700, 2100, 2200 cum 1234.00 6737.00 8313458
and 2300.
5.07 Providing, Cutting, bending and fixing in position of T.M.T. bar
reinforcement in reinforced cement concrete structures complete as per tonne 82.65 49214.00 4067463
drawing and Technical Specifications Section 1600.
5.08 Providing and constructing RCC Railing in M-30 grade including
reinforcement complete as per drawings and Technical Specification Sections Lm 128.00 1492.00 190976
1500, 1600, 1700, 2200 and Clause 2703.
5.09 Providing and laying 150 mm thick, M-15 grade cement concrete in leveling
course under approach slabs complete as per drawings and Technical cum 100.80 5181.00 522245
Specification Sections 1500, 1600, 1700, 2200 and Clause 2703.
5.10 Providing and laying Reinforced cement concrete M-30 grade in approach
slab including reinforcement and form work complete as per drawings and cum 201.60 8764.00 1766822
Technical Specification Sections 1500, 1600, 1700, 2200 and Clause 2704.
5.11 Providing and fixing Tar paper bearing complete as per drawing and IRC: SP:
sqm 57.60 116.00 6682
13-2004.
5.12 Providing and fixing drainage spouts in Slab and Box culvert as per drawing
and Technical Specifications Section 2705. Nr. 32.00 922.00 29504
5.13 Providing 75 mm thick RCC M-30 wearing course over Box Culvert Deck all
complete as per drawing and Technical Specifications Section 2700. sqm 40.63 9983.00 405569
5.14 Providing and fixing in position 20 mm thick compressible fibre board

expansion joint as per drawing and IRC:SP-13-2004 or as directed by the Lm 96.00 327.00 31392
Engineer.
36
5.00 BOX CULVERT

5.15 Providing weep holes in abutments, wing walls, retaining walls, return walls,
box structures etc. with 100 mm dia. A.C. pipes complete as per drawing and Nr. 634.40 132.00 83741
Technical Specification 2706.
5.16 Providing and laying Dry Stone boulder Apron / Stone boulder pitching on
slopes complete as per drawings and Technical Specifications Section 2500. cum 1091.70 2277.00 2485801
5.17 Painting culvert No. with synthetic enamel complete as per drawing,
Technical Specification Section 800, IRC:7-1971 and directions of the Nr. 16.00 365.00 5840
Engineer.
5.18 Painting of RCC Railing and Parapets with two coats of cement based paint
as per technical specifications and the directions of the Engineer. sqm 192.00 368.00 70656
Total Amount for Bill No. 5 36637037.08
37
6. Drainage and Protective Work
6.01 Earthwork in excavation for foundation in all types of soil for construction of drains,
vertical fall, outfall and escape including transporting for use or disposal of surplus
cum 92,192 103 9,495,776
excavated earth with all leads and lifts as per MoRTH Technical Specifications
Section 300.
6.02 Construction of RCC M-20 grade Road side drain (As per Drawing) in Built-up
Section as per drawing including cost of cover, centering, shuttering with all leads
and lifts all complete job as per drawing and Technical Specifications Clause 1500, cum 19,807 5854 115,949,446
1700, 2100 & 2200.
6.03 Providing and fixing in position uncoated Fe-500 grade HSD reinforcement in
reinforced cement concrete structures complete as per drawing and Technical tonne 792 49214.00 38989299
Specifications Section 1600.
6.04 Providing PCC (M-15) in foundation of Drain as per drawing all complete job as
per Drawing, Technical Specifications Section 1700, 2100 and Direction of Engineer cum. 3,673 5181.00 19,031,238
6.05 Providing and laying RCC Drainage Pipe of 150 mm. Dia for Connecting Road
Side Drain to discharge surface runoff to side drain as shown in drawing all Lm 2,485 315 782,732
complete as per drawing & Technical Specifications Clause 2900.
6.06 Providing and erecting a "W Shaped" metal beam crash barrier comprising of 3 mm
thick corrugated sheet metal beam rail, 85 cm above road/ground level, fixed on
ISMC series channel vertical post, 150 x 75 x 5 mm spaced 2 m centre to centre, 2 m
high with 1.15 m below ground level, all steel parts and fitments to be galvanised by
hot dip process, all fittings to conform to IS:1367 and IS:1364, metal beam rail to be Lm 600 2164 1,298,400
fixed on the vertical post with a space of channel section 150 x 75 x 5 mm, 546 mm
long as per details & schedule attached in drawing all complete job as per Technical
Specifications clause 810, 811.
38
7. Traffic Signs, Marking and Road Appurtenances
7.01 Providing with hot applied thermoplastic paints conforming to
ASTM D36/BS-3262 (Part - I) as per drawing & Technical
Specifications Clause 803.
a. Lane/centre line/edge line/ transverse marking and any other
sqm 7,900.00 791.00 6,248,900
markings
b. Directional Arrows, lettering etc. as per Drg. No.61 of
MoRTH "Type Design for Inter-sections on National Nr. 45.00 755.00 33,975
Highways”.
7.02 Supplying and fixing at site retro-reflectorised type sign
boards/signs made of encapsulated lense type of reflective
sheeting fixed over aluminum sheeting 2.0 mm thick complete
including vertical pipes/ angles/ posts etc. all complete as per
supplied drawing and MoRTH Technical specifications Clause
801
A) Informatory Sign
i) Direction / advance Direction Sign (0.90 Sqm. Size) Nr. 32 12509 400,288
ii) Route Marker signs (600 x 450) Nr. 32 4412 141,184
B) Cautionary Signs Nr. 92 5258 483,736
C) Mandatory signs 0
i) Stop sign (900 octagonal) Nr. 60 8664 519,840
ii) Speed Limit sign, Overtaking prohibited (600 Dia) Nr. 90 4550 409,500
7.03 Providing and fixing retro-reflectorised road delineators
complete as per drawing and MoRTH Technical Specifications
Cl a) Road
80 Delineators Nr. 460.00 1065 489,900
b) Cluster of Red Reflectors Junctions Nr. 300.00 1065 319,500
c) Hazard markers Nr. 165.00 1865 307,725
d) Object markers Nr. 145.00 1890 274,050
39

7.05 Providing & Marking Retro Reflective Painting (Size 200 mm x
100 mm) on Road Side Tree in first row adjacent to carriageway
all complete job as Technical Specifications Sections 800. Nr. 1,450.00 175 253,750
7.06 Providing Painting on Road Side Tree trunk in first row adjacent
to carriageway up to height 2.00 m. (Alternative White & Red
Strips) all complete job as Technical Specifications Sections Nr. 1,450.00 300 435,000
800.
40
Construction of High Level RCC Bridge in Replacement of Existing Narrow and Damaged
Arch Bridge in Mamalka at Chainage-142.680 in the State of Bihar
General Abstract of Cost for Proposed Bridge in Km. 143
Item Amount
Description
No. ( In Rs.)
1 Cost of Construction of Proposed Bridge 3,42,99,345.00
2 Construction of Diversion (250 m. Length) 69,42,077.00
Sub Total of (1) - 4,12,41,422.00
Cost Estimate
A. Foundation Work
Sl Item Description of Work Unit Estimated Rate Amount
No. No. Quantity in Rs. in Rs.
1.01 12.1 Earth work in excavation of foundation of structures
(I) (A) as per drawing and technical specification, including
setting out, construction of shoring and bracing,
removal of stumps and other deleterious matter, cum 246.312 103.00 25,370.00
dressing of sides and bottom and backfilling with
approved material. as per MORTH clause No. - 304
1.02 13.9 Back filling behind abutment, wing wall and return
wall with sandy Material complete as per drawing
and Technical Specification & as per clouse 710.1.4 cum 935.281 820.00 7,66,931.00
of IRC : 78 & 2200 of MORTH
1.03 12.39 Providing & Laying Plain Cement Concrete M-15
levelling course 100mm thick below the pile cap. as
per MOR&TH and Technical Specifications Sections cum 41.472 5,181.00 2,14,866.00
1100 & 1700
1.04 12.25 Providing bored cast-in-situ RCC Vertical Piles M-
35 Grade 1200 mm. Dia. with all required
accessories excluding reinforcement all complete m 615.200 14,750.00 90,74,200.00
job as per drawing and Technical Specifications
Sections 1100, 1600 and 1700
1.05 12.38 Providing RCC M35 grade for Pile Cap all complete
(D) (ii) as per Drawing and Technical Specification as per
calus 1100, 1500 & 1700 Using Batching Plant, cum 459.00 6,582.00 30,21,138.00
Transit Mixer and Concrete Pump
1.06 12.40 Supplying, Fitting and Placing un-coated HYSD bar

Reinforcement in Foundation all complete as per
Drawing and Technical Specifications as per M.T. 104.50 49,214.00 51,42,765.00
MORTH clause No. - 1600
1.07 Carrying our confirmatory bores up to required
depths as each foundation of bridge complete in all
respects s as per MORTH clause No. - 7.4 of IRC :
i) Depth between 0 m to 10 m m 30.00 950.00 28,500.00
ii) Depth between 10 m to 20 m m 30.00 1,050.00 31,500.00

iii) Depth between 20 m to 30 m m 30.00 1,150.00 34,500.00
iv) Depth between 30 m to 40 m m 15.00 1,350.00 20,250.00
41

1.08 12.37 Pile Load Test on single Vertical Pile in in
(a) accordance with IS:2911(Part-IV) as per MORT&H No 1.00 2,50,000.00 2,50,000.00
clause No.-1100
1.09 12.37 Lateral load test on single Vertical Pile in
(b) accordance with IS:2911(Part-IV) as per MORT&H No 1.00 3,00,000.00 3,00,000.00
clause No.-1100
B. Sub-Structure Work
1.10 13.5 G Plain Cement Concrete / Reinforced Cement
(p) Concrete M-30 Grade with Batching Plant, Transit
Case-II Mixer and Concrete Pump. Height upto 5m in
Substructure but excluding reinforcement all cum 229.61 6,737.00 15,46,872.00
complete job. as per drawings and Technical
1.11 13.5 H Plain Cement Concrete / Reinforced Cement
(q) Concrete M-40 Grade with Batching Plant, Transit
Case-II Mixer and Concrete Pump. in Secimic Reaction
Block and Pedestal excluding reinforcement all cum 14.26 7,619.00 1,08,616.00
complete job. as per drawings and Technical
1.12 13.10 Providing and laying of Filter media with granular
materials/stone crushed aggregates satisfying the
requirements laid down in clause 2504.2.2. of
MoRTH specifications to a thickness of not less than
600 mm with smaller size towards the soil and cum 114.30 1,876.00 2,14,422.00
bigger size towards the wall and provided over the
entire surface behind abutment to the full height all
complete as per drawing and Technical Specification
710.1.4 of IRC : 78 & 2200
1.13 13.8 Providing weep holes in Reinforced concrete
abutment, wing wall/ return wall with 100 mm dia AC
pipe, extending through the full width of the structure
no 128.00 132.00 16,896.00
with slope of 1V :20H towards drawing foce.
Complete as per drawing and Technical
Specifications as per Clause 2706 & 2200 of
1.14 13.6 Supplying, fitting and placing HYSD bar
reinforcement in sub-structure complete as per
drawing and Technical Specifications and Section M.T. 29.01 49,337.00 14,31,365.00
1600 & 2200 of MORTH
C. Super-Structure Work
1.15 14.1C Furnishing and Placing Reinforced/ Prestressed
(ii) (p) cement concrete M30 in T-Beam + Slab Super-
Case-II structure as per drawing and Technical Specification cum 318.39 7,660.00 24,38,841.00
1500 & 1600 1700 of MORTH Using Batching Plant,
Transit Mixer and Concrete Pump.
1.16 14.2 Providing, supplying, fitting, fixing and placing HYSD

bar in super-structure as per drawing and Technical
M.T. 79.04 50,334.00 39,78,399.00
Specification & section 1600 of MORTH
1.17 14.4 Providing RCC M30 grade in wearing coat over deck
slab and approach slab as per drawing and cum 36.04 9,983.00 3,59,747.00
Technical Specification & MORTH clouse 2702
1.18 14.9 Providing Drainage Spot as per drawing and
Technical Specification & Section 2705 of MORTH no 18.00 922.00 16,596.00
42

1.19 13.14 Supplying and fixing of bearings complete as per
drawings and Technical Specifications Section 2000
& 2200
a) Tar paper below approach slab over bracket sqm 6.40 116.00 742.00
b) Elastomeric bearing cucm 5,18,400.00 0.61 3,16,224.00
c) Neoprene Pad for seismic block cucm 96,000.00 0.61 58,560.00

1.20 14.22 Providing and laying of Strip Seal expension Joints
catering to maximum horizontal movement p to
70mm, complete as per drawings and standard
Specifications to be installed by the PRM 64.00 11,844.00 7,58,016.00
manufacture/Supplier or their authorised
representative ensuring complete to the
manufacturers instructions for installation. Clause
1.21 14.7 Construction of RCC railing of M30 Grade, complete
as per approved drawings and technical m 101.76 1,492.00 1,51,826.00
specifications & section 2703, 1500, 1600 & 1700 of
1.22 8.22 Provision of an Reinforced cement concrete crash
barrier at the edges of the road, approaches to
bridge structures and medians, constructed with M- m 101.76 3,250.00 3,30,720.00
40 grade concrete with HYSD reinforcement
conforming to IRC:21
1.23 14.10 PCC M15 Grade leveling course below approach

slab complete as per drawing and Technical cum 18.00 5,181.00 93,258.00
specification and clouse 2700 of MORTH
1.24 14.11 Reinforced cement concrete M30 approach slab

including reinforcement and formwork complete as
per drawing and Technical specification & Section cum 34.56 8,764.00 3,02,884.00
1500, 1600, 1700 & 2704 of MORTH
D. Bed / Slope Protection Work + Misc. work

1.25 15.2 Providing and laying of boulder apron laid in wire
crates made with 4mm dia GI wire conforming to IS:
280 & IS:4826 in 100mm x 100mm mesh (weaved
diagonally) including 10 per cent extra for laps and cum 207.06 2,277.00 4,71,466.00
joints laid with stone boulders weighing not less than
40 kg each. Technical specification Clause 2503 of
MORTH
1.26 15.5 Providing and laying Filter material underneath
pitching in slopes complete as per drawing and cum 316.67 1,959.00 6,20,353.00
Technical specification specification Clause 2504 of
MORTH
1.27 15.4 Providing and laying Pitching on slopes laid over
prepared filter media including boulder apron laid dry
in front of toe of embankment complete as per cum 633.34 1,847.00 11,69,772.00
drawing and Technical specifications. Technical
specification Clause 2504 of MORTH
1.40 14.16 Painting on concrete surface (Providing and applying

2 coats of water based cement paint to unplastered
concrete surface after cleaning the surface of dirt,
Sqm. 3,650.00 275.00 10,03,750.00
dust, oil, grease, efflorescence and applying paint
@ of 1 litre for 2 Sq.m. ) all complete as per
drawings and Technical Specifications Clause 800
Cost of Construction of Proposed Bridge 3,42,99,345.00
43

E. Construction of Diversion
1.29 2.3 (ii) Clearing and grubbing road land including uprooting
rank vegetation, grass, bushes, shrubs, saplings and
trees girth up to 300 mm, removal of stumps of trees
cut earlier and disposal of unserviceable materials
as per Technical Specification Clause 201 of
MORTH
A In the area of light Jungle. Sqm. 3800.00 3.96 15,038.00
1.30 3.2 Earthwork in excavation necessary for
construction of roadway in all types of soil including
conglomerates/soil mixed with boulders all leads and Cum. 465.00 97.74 45,447.00
lifts all complete job as per drawings and Technical
Specifications Clause 301.
1.31 3.16 Construction of embankment with approved material
obtained from borrow pits with all lifts and leads,
transporting to site, spreading, grading to required
slope and compacting to meet requirement of table Cum. 11,000.00 267.00 29,37,000.00
300-2 and as per Technical specifiaction Clause 305
1.32 12.39 Providing & Laying Plain Cement Concrete M-15 for
H.P bed. all complete job complete as per drawings
and Technical Specifications Sections 1100 & 1700 Cum. 152.95 5,181.00 7,92,413.00
1.33 9.2 Laying Reinforced cement concrete pipe

NP4/prestressed concrete pipe for culverts on first
class bedding of granular material in single row
including fixing collar with cement mortar 1:2 but
excluding excavation, protection works, backfilling, m. 250.00 4,629.00 11,57,250.00
concrete and masonry works in head walls and
parapets. and as per Technical Specification Clause
2900 of MORTH
1.34 4.2 (i) Construction of Granular sub-base by providing
coarse graded material, spreading in uniform layers
with motor grader on prepared surface, mixing by
mix in place method with rotavator at OMC, and Cum. 219.00 2,068.00 4,52,892.00
compacting with vibratory roller to achieve the
desired density, complete as per clause 401 of
MORTH. (Coarse Graded) of Grading - I
1.35 4.12 Providing, laying, spreading and compacting graded
stone aggregate to Wet Mix Macadam specification
including premixing the Material with water at OMC
in mechanical mix plant carriage of mixed Material
by tipper to site, laying in uniform layers with paver Cum. 280.00 2,096.00 5,86,880.00
in sub- base / base course on well prepared surface
and compacting with vibratory roller to achieve the
desired density. Clause 406 of MORTH
1.36 5.1 Prime coat (Providing and applying primer coat with
bitumen emulsion on prepared surface of granular
Base including clearing of road surface and spraying Sqm. 2,450.00 29.10 71,295.00
primer at the rate of 0.60 kg/sqm using mechanical
means. Specification Clause 502) of MORTH
44

1.37 5.2 Providing and applying tack coat with bitumen
emulsion using emulsion pressure distributor at the
rate of 0.25 kg per sqm on the prepared
Sqm. 4,900.00 11.50 56,350.00
bituminous/Primed granular surface cleaned with
mechanical broom. Specification Clause 503 of
MORTH
1.38 5.3 Providing and laying 50 mm. thick Dense graded
Bituminous Macadam (DBM) using Modified
Bitumen (Refinery Packed & produce) as per Cum. 70.00 6,784.00 4,74,880.00
drawing and Technical Specifications Clauses 505
1.39 d 501 and laying 30 mm. Thick Bituminous
5.7 Providing
Concrete (BC) wearing course using Modified
Bitumen (Refinery Packed & produce) complete as Cum. 42.00 8,396.00 3,52,632.00
per drawing and Technical Specifications Clauses
507
1.41 Complete Dismentaling of Diversion after
Construction and opening of Bridge and Storing the
L.S 4,50,000
Servicible Materials all complete Job as per
Direction of Engineer I/C
Total Cost for Diversion = 69,42,077.00
45
4. Detailed Computation of Quantities for

Road and Bridge Work
46
Chainage Wise Proposed Cross Section of Highway

NH-80, Ch. 135.000 to 166.000
C/S Chainage Length in Land Existing Proposed Proposed Crust Overlay
Sl.
Type m. Use Carriage Strengthening
No. From To
way with
1 Type-3 135.000 137.150 2150.000 Built-Up 7.0 Bituminous GSB 20% Profile Correction, 200
Overlay mm. WMM, 120 mm. DBM, 40
mm. BC + RCC Drain with Cover
2 Type-1 137.150 137.600 450.000 Open 7.0 Bituminous GSB 20% Profile Correction, 200
Overlay mm. WMM, 120 mm. DBM,
40 mm. BC
40 mm. BC
6 Type-4 139.600 140.100 500.000 Built-up 5.5 Bituminous GSB 20% Profile Correction, 200
40 mm. BC
8 Type-4 142.850 144.450 1600.000 Built-up 5.5 Bituminous GSB 20% Profile Correction, 200
40 mm. BC
40 mm. BC
40 mm. BC
16 Type-1 152.225 152.800 575.000 Open 7 Bituminous GSB 20% Profile Correction, 200
40 mm. BC
47
17 Type-3 152.800 153.025 225.000 Built-Up 7 Bituminous GSB 20% Profile Correction, 200
40 mm. BC
19 Type-3 153.250 153.525 275.000 Built-Up 7 Bituminous GSB 20% Profile Correction, 200
40 mm. BC
40 mm. BC
40 mm. BC
40 mm. BC
40 mm. BC
40 mm. BC
Length of Type -1 C/S - 7 m. Carriageway open Area in m. 8920
Length of Type -2 C/S - 5.50m. Carriageway open Area in m. 7675
Length of Type -4 C/S - 7.00 m. Carriageway Built-up Area in m. 8080
Length of Type -3 C/S - 5.50m. Carriageway Built-up Area in m. 6325
48
Road work Quantity based on each individual cross section

Ch. 135.000 to 166.000
TCS ‐TYPE ‐1 (Open area with 7.00 m. Carriage way ‐ Total Length = 8.920 Km.)
Sl. Item of Work Length in Width in m. Thickness in m. Quantity Total Length Total
No. m. per Km. in Km. Quantity
1 20 % GSB (150 1000 7.000 0.030 210.000 8.920 1873.200
mm. thick) for
Levelling work
and Pot Filling
2 WMM 200 mm. 1000 7.000 0.200 1400.000 8.920 12488.000

Layer
3 Prime Coat over 1000 7.000 7000.000 8.920 62440.000

WMM
4 Tack Coat (2 1000 7.000 7000.000 8.920 124880.000

Coat)
5 DBM 120 mm. 1000 7.000 0.120 840.000 8.920 7492.800
Thick Overlay
6 BC 40 mm. thick 1000 7.000 0.040 280.000 8.920 2497.600

over DBM
TCS ‐ TYPE ‐ 2 (Open area with 5.50 m. Carriageway ‐ Total Length = 7.675 Km.)
Sl. Item of Work Length in Width in m. Thickness in m. Total Total Length Total
No. m. Quantity in Km. Quantity
1 20 % GSB (150 1000 7.000 0.030 210.000 7.675 1611.750
mm. thick) for
Levelling work
and Pot Filling
2 WMM 200 mm. 1000 5.500 0.200 1100.000 7.675 8442.500

Layer
3 Prime Coat over 1000 5.500 5500.000 7.675 42212.500

WMM
4 Tack Coat (2 1000 5.500 5500.000 7.675 84425.000
Coat)
5 DBM 120 mm. 1000 5.500 0.120 660.000 7.675 5065.500

Thick Overlay
6 BC 40 mm. thick 1000 5.500 0.040 220.000 7.675 1688.500

over DBM
49
TCS ‐ TYPE ‐ 3 (Built‐up Area with 7.00 m. Carriageway ‐ Total Length = 8.080 Km.)
1 20 % GSB (150 1000 7.000 0.030 210.000 8.080 1696.800

mm. thick) for
Levelling work
and Pot Filling
2 WMM 200 mm. 1000 7.000 0.200 1400.000 8.080 11312.000
Layer
3 Prime Coat over 1000 7.000 7000.000 8.080 56560.000

WMM
4 Tack Coat (2 1000 7.000 7000.000 8.080 113120.000

Coat)
5 DBM 120 mm. 1000 7.000 0.120 840.000 8.080 6787.200

Thick Overlay
6 BC 40 mm. thick 1000 7.000 0.040 280.000 8.080 2262.400

over DBM
TCS ‐ TYPE ‐ 4 (Built‐up Area with 5.50 m. Carriageway ‐ Total Length = 6.325 Km.)
1 20 % GSB (150 1000 7.000 0.030 210.000 6.325 1328.250
mm. thick) for
Levelling work
and Pot Filling
2 WMM 200 mm. 1000 5.500 0.200 1100.000 6.325 6957.500
Layer
3 Prime Coat over 1000 5.500 5500.000 6.325 34787.500

WMM
4 Tack Coat (2 1000 5.500 5500.000 6.325 69575.000

Coat)
5 DBM 120 mm. 1000 5.500 0.120 660.000 6.325 4174.500

Thick Overlay
6 BC 40 mm. thick 1000 5.500 0.040 220.000 6.325 1391.500

over DBM
50
Summary of Quantity for Road Work under Proposed

strengthening Work
Sl. No. Item of Work Total Quantity Unit
1 Providing 20 % GSB (150 5880 Cum.

mm. thick) for Levelling work
and Pot Filling
2 WMM 200 mm. Layer 39200.00 Cum.

3 Prime Coat over WMM 196000.00 Sqm.
4 Tack Coat (2 Coat) 392000.00 Sqm.
5 DBM 120 mm. Thick Overlay 23520.0 Cum.
6 BC 40 mm. thick over DBM 7840.0 Cum.
51
Chainage Wise Proposed Drain cum Foot Path on

NH-80, Ch. 135.000 to 166.000
C/S Chainage Length of Total Remarks
Type From To Drain in m. Length
Type-3 135.000 137.150 2150.000 (B th id Built-Up
4300
Type-3 137.600 138.000 400.000 800 Built-Up
Type-4 138.000 138.150 150.000 300 Built-Up
Type-4 139.600 140.100 500.000 1000 Built-up
Type-4 142.850 144.450 1600.000 3200 Built-up
Type-4 144.850 145.875 1025.000 2050 Built-Up
Type-4 147.625 148.050 425.000 850 Built-Up
Type-4 149.375 152.000 2625.000 5250 Built-Up
Type-3 152.000 152.225 225.000 450 Built-Up
Type-3 152.800 153.025 225.000 450 Built-Up
Type-3 153.250 153.525 275.000 550 Built-Up
Type-3 155.050 155.500 450.000 900 Built-Up
Type-3 155.700 156.100 400.000 800 Built-Up
Type-3 156.500 156.950 450.000 900 Built-Up
Type-3 158.500 160.300 1800.000 3600 Built-Up
Type-3 161.400 162.375 975.000 1950 Built-Up
Type-3 165.270 166.000 730.000 1460 Built-Up
Total Length of Proposed Drain 14405.000 28810
52
Earth Work Quantity
Earth work Quantity as per Proposed Cross Section Arrangement of Highway

C/S Type Chainage Length in Existing Embankment Proposed cross Total Volume
From To m. Carriageway Ht. In m. section Area of of Earth Work
Width (m) highway in sqm. Involved in
Cum.
Type-3 135.000 137.150 2150.000 7.0 0.5 2 4300
Type-1 137.150 137.600 450.000 7.0 2.8 11 4950
Type-3 137.600 138.000 400.000 7.0 0.5 2 800
Type-4 138.000 138.150 150.000 5.5 0.5 2 300
Type-2 138.150 139.600 1450.000 5.5 3.5 14 20300
Type-4 139.600 140.100 500.000 5.5 0.5 2 1000
Type-2 140.100 142.850 2750.000 5.5 3.3 13.2 36300
Type-4 142.850 144.450 1600.000 5.5 0.5 2 3200
Type-2 144.450 144.850 400.000 5.5 3.2 12.8 5120
Type-4 144.850 145.875 1025.000 5.5 0.5 2 2050
Type-2 145.875 147.625 1750.000 5.5 3 12 21000
Type-4 147.625 148.050 425.000 5.5 0.5 2 850
Type-2 148.050 149.375 1325.000 5.5 3.3 13.2 17490
Type-4 149.375 152.000 2625.000 5.5 0.5 2 5250
Type-3 152.000 152.225 225.000 7.0 0.5 2 450
Type-1 152.225 152.800 575.000 7 3.2 12.8 7360
Type-3 152.800 153.025 225.000 7 0.5 2 450
Type-1 153.025 153.250 225.000 7.0 3.10 12.4 2790
Type-3 153.250 153.525 275.000 7 0.5 2 550
Type-1 153.525 155.050 1525.000 7.0 3.2 12.8 19520
Type-3 155.050 155.500 450.000 7.0 0.5 2 900
Type-1 155.500 155.700 200.000 7.0 3.0 12 2400
Type-3 155.700 156.100 400.000 7.0 0.5 2 800
Type-1 156.100 156.500 400.000 7.0 2.8 11 4400
Type-3 156.500 156.950 450.000 7.0 0.5 2 900
Type-1 156.950 158.500 1550.000 7.0 3.0 12 18600
Type-3 158.500 160.300 1800.000 7.0 0.5 2 3600
Type-1 160.300 161.400 1100.000 7.0 3.0 12 13200
Type-3 161.400 162.375 975.000 7.0 0.5 2 1950
Type-1 162.375 165.270 2895.000 7.0 3.3 13 37635
Type-3 165.270 166.000 730.000 7.0 0.5 2 1460
Total Volume of Earthwork in Filling for Embankment 239875
Summary of Earth-work involved in Project Section
53
1 Earthwork in excavation necessary for construction of roadway in all types of soil all
complete as per Technical Specifications Clause 301 = 31000 x 6.0 x 0.60 = 111600.00
2 Earth work in Filling for widening of embankment to achieve 12 m. Formation width

with suitable material obtained from road cutting with all leads and lifts all complete
89280.00
as per drawings and Tech. Specifications Clause 305. (80% of Excavated Earth)
3 Earth work in Filling for widening of embankment to achieve 12 m. Formation width

with suitable material obtained from and Borrow Area with all leads and lifts all 150595.00
complete as per drawings and Tech. Specifications Clause 305.
4 Disposal of surplus earth/unsuitable material by Mechanical transport for extra lead
beyond initial lead of 1 kms. 22320
54
Detailed Quantity Computation for Strengthening work of existing Intermediate /Two Lane NH-80 Stretch Km. 136 to Km. 166 (Sabour -
Ramjanipur Section) in the State of Bihar
1.00 SITE CLEARANCE AND DISMANTLING
Measurement Estimated
Item Description Unit
length Bredth Depth Quantity
1.01 Dismantling of existing structures like culverts, bridges, retaining walls and other
structure comprising of masonry, cement concrete, wood work, steel work, including
T&P and scaffolding wherever necessary, sorting the dismantled material, disposal of
unserviceable material with all lifts and leads, excavation and backfilling to required
compaction complete as per MoRT&H Technical Specifications Clause 202.
(i) Brick /Stone Masonry (Widening & Reconstruction of Culverts, Bridges, Drains cum
etc.) As per Site Condition 785.00
(ii) Apron/Stone Pitching cum
(iii) Plain Concrete/reinforced cement concrete structures including cleaning, As per Site Condition 80.00
a) PCC (Drains, Culverts/Bridges Abutments/Piers & Wing Wall) cum As per Site Condition 40.00
(iv) Removing Hume Pipe (600 to 900 mm. dia.) Lm Existing Damaged HP Culvert 65.00
1.02 Dismantling of flexible pavements and disposal of dismantled materials up to a lead
of 1000 metres, stacking serviceable and unserviceable materials separately as per
MoRTH Technical Specifications Clause 202.
(a) Bituminous courses cum 31,000.00 7.00 0.080 17,360.00
(b) Granular courses cum 12,600.00 7.00 0.150 13,230.00
55
Detailed Quantity Computation for Strengthening work of existing Intermediate /Two Lane NH-80 Stretch Km. 136 to Km. 166
(Sabour - Ramjanipur Section) in the State of Bihar
5.00 DRAINAGE AND PROTECTION WORKS
Item Measurement Estimated
Description Unit
No. length Bredth Depth Quantity
5.01 Earthwork in excavation for foundation in all types of soil for construction
of drains, vertical fall, outfall and escape including disposal of surplus
excavated earth with all leads as per MoRTH Technical Specifications cum 28810.00 2.00 1.60 92192.00
Sections 300.
5.02 Providing cement concrete M-15 grade PCC (Levelling Course below
drains, in vertical fall, outfall, escape for drainage arrangement as per
drawing and MoRTH Technical Specifications sections 1500, 1700 and cum 28810.00 1.70 0.075 3673.28
2500.
5.03 Construction of RCC M-20 grade Road side covered drain as per
drawing - 1.25 m. avg. Height, 1.25 m. inner width and 125 mm side wall 28810 x {(1.25 x
thickness) including cost of centering, shuttering with all leads and lifts all cum 0.125)+(1.50x2x0.125)+ 19806.88
complete job as per drawing and Technical Specifications Clause 309 and (1.25x0.125)}
Sections 1500 & 1700.
5.04 Providing and fixing in position uncoated Fe-500 grade HSD reinforcement
in reinforced cement concrete structures complete as per drawing and tonne 19806 x 40 /1000 792.24
Technical Specifications Section 1600.
56
Detailed Quantity Computation for Strengthening work of existing Intermediate /Two Lane NH-80
Stretch Km. 136 to Km. 166 (Sabour - Ramjanipur Section) in the State of Bihar
7.00 TRAFFIC SIGNS, MARKING AND OTHER ROAD APPURTENANCES
Estimated
Item Description Unit
Quantity
7.01 Providing with hot applied thermoplastic paints conforming to ASTM D36/BS-
3262 (Part - I) as per drawing & Technical Specifications Clause 803.
a. Lane/centre line/edge line/ transverse marking and any other markings sqm 7,900.00
b. Directional Arrows, lettering etc. as per Drg. No.61 of MoRTH "Type
Design for Inter-sections on National Highways”. Nr. 80.00
7.02 Supplying and fixing at site traffic signs having retro-reflectorive sheeting of
high intensity grade (Type III) fixed over aluminum sheeting 2.0 mm thick
complete including vertical pipes/ angles/ posts etc. all complete Job as per
drawing and MoRTH Technical specifications Clause 801
A) Informatory Sign
i) Direction / advance Direction Sign (0.90 Sqm. Size) Nr. 32
ii) Route Marker signs (600 x 450) Nr. 32
B) Cautionary Signs Nr. 92
C) Mandatory signs
i) Stop sign (900 octagonal) Nr. 60
ii) Speed Limit sign, Overtaking prohibited (600 Dia) Nr. 90
7.03 Providing and fixing retro-reflectorised road delineators complete as per
drawing and MoRTH Technical Specifications Clause 805
a) Road Delineators Nr. 460.00
b) Cluster of Red Reflectors Junctions Nr. 300.00
c) Hazard markers Nr. 165.00
d) Object markers Nr. 145.00
57
Detailed Quantity for Single Cell Box Culvert

No. of Culverts (Replacement) = 4 2 0 1
No. of Culverts (New) = 0 0 1 0
Total No. of Culverts

= 4 2 1 1 Total
(Replacement+New))
Quantity
Size of Proposed Box Culverts (span
= 4m. x 2m. 4m. x 4m. 6m. x 4m. 6m. x 5m.
x Ht.)
Item of Work
Unit (1/42/0) (1/44/0) (1/64/0) (1/65/0)
(A) Quantity of Box Cell :
Earthwork in excavation in
1 Cum. 375.840 243.00 130.248 157.140 906.228
foundation
Providing Back filling in
2 Cum. 37.584 24.30 13.025 15.714 90.623
foundation
3 Providing M30 in Box Cell Cum. 456.000 298.00 222.000 258.000 1234.000
4 PCC M15 Leveling Course Cum. 41.760 27.00 14.472 17.460 100.692
Providing Fe-500 Grade Steel
5 M.T 31.328 20.16 15.233 15.927 82.649
Bars including 5% wastages:
Providing M15 Lev. in Apprach
6 Cum. 50.400 25.20 12.600 12.600 100.800
Slab
7 Providing M30 in Approach Slab Cum. 100.800 50.40 25.200 25.200 201.600
Providing RCC M30 Wearing
8 Cum. 18.000 9.18 6.696 6.750 40.626
Coat
9 Providing RCC M-30 in Railing m. 60.000 30.00 19.000 19.000 128.000
10 Providing Drainage Spout Nos. 16.000 8.00 4.000 4.000 32.000
11 Providing Weep Holes Nos. 96.000 72.00 60.000 80.000 308.000
12 Filter Media Behined Box Cell Cum. 115.200 100.80 57.600 72.000 345.600
(B) Quantity of wing wall :

13 Cum. 630.339 589.93 332.485 563.740 2116.492
foundation :
Providing M15 in Lev. Course in
14 Cum. 53.306 52.16 29.754 40.978 176.195
Wing wall
15 Providing M20 in Wing wall Cum. 466.452 440.09 245.128 436.387 1588.056
16 Providing Weep Holes Nos. 163.200 81.60 40.800 40.800 326.400
17 Filter Media Behined Wing Wall Cum. 96.000 134.40 76.800 115.200 422.400
(C) Quantity of Curtain wall :

18 Cum. 1125.739 766.28 452.173 563.070 2907.264
foundation :
Providing M15 in Lev. Course in
19 Cum. 27.600 18.00 10.400 12.400 68.400
Curtain wall
20 Providing M15 in Curtain wall Cum. 185.600 120.60 69.700 83.200 459.100
58
(D) Quantity of Floor Protection & Appron:
Providing 150 mm thik. M15in

21 Cum. 52.400 45.80 29.500 43.200 170.900
Floor Appron
Providing 300 mm thik. M15 in
22 Cum. 104.800 91.60 59.000 86.300 341.700
Floor Appron
Providing 150mm Flat Stone
23 Cum. 52.400 45.80 29.500 43.200 170.900
Flooring
Providing 750mm Thick
24 Cum. 372.400 241.80 139.800 166.800 920.800
Flexiable Appron
59
Bill of Quantity (Bridge Work and Diversion)

A. Foundation Work
Sl Item Description of Work Unit Quantity No. of Total
No. No. for one Abut. & Estimated
Abut. & Pier Quantity
one Pier
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1.01 12.1 (I) Earth work in excavation of foundation of structures as
( A) per drawing and technical specification, including setting
out, construction of shoring and bracing, removal of
stumps and other deleterious matter, dressing of sides
and bottom and backfilling with approved material. as per
MORTH clause No. - 304
Refer (A) Abut. Found. (item No.-1) cum 93.33 2.00 186.668
Refer (A) Pier. Found. (item No.-1) cum 29.82 2.00 59.644
Total Quantity = 246.312
1.02 13.9 B Back filling behind abutment, wing wall and return
wall with sandy Material complete as per drawing and
Technical Specification & as per clouse 710.1.4 of IRC :
78 & 2200 of MORTH
1.03 12.39 Providing & Laying Plain Cement Concrete M-15
levelling course 100mm thick below the pile cap. all
complete job complete as per drawings and Technical
Specifications Sections 1100 & 1700
1.04 12.22 Providing Steel Liner 10 mm thick including Fabricating
and Setting out as per Detailed Drawing & as per MORTH
clause No. - 1200 & 1900.
Refer (2) Abut. Steel. (item No.-9) M.T. 0.00 2.00 0.000
Refer (2) Pier. Steel. (item No.-9) M.T. 1.20 2.00 2.402
1.05 12.25 Providing bored cast-in-situ RCC Vertical Piles M-35
Grade 1200 mm. Dia. with all required accessories
excluding reinforcement all complete job as per drawing
and Technical Specifications Sections 1100, 1600 and
Refer (A) Abut. Found. (item No.-8) m 175.60 2.00 351.200
Refer (A) Pier. Found. (item No.-7) m 132.00 2.00 264.000
1.06 12.38 Providing RCC M35 grade for Pile Cap all complete as
(D) (ii) per Drawing and Technical Specification as per caluse
1100, 1500 & 1700 U
1.07 12.40 Supplying, Fitting and Placing un-coated HYSD bar
Reinforcement in Foundation all complete as per
Drawing and Technical Specifications as per MORTH
clause No. - 1600
Refer Abut. Steel. (2. Foundation) M.T. 31.35 2.00 62.700
Refer Pier. Steel. (2. Foundation) M.T. 20.90 2.00 41.798
60

one Pier
1.08 Dismentaling of Pile Top (Surplus Portion) including
liner up to avg. 1.5 m. length before casting of Pile Cap all
complete Job as per specification and direction of E/I.
Abutment m 8.00 2.00 16.000
Pier m 6.00 2.00 12.000
1.09 Carrying our confirmatory bores up to required depths
as each foundation of bridge complete in all respects
including testing as per Technical Specification Section
2400 and interpretation of the bore data and presentation
of the results as per MORTH clause No. - 7.4 of IRC : 78
i) Depth between 0 m to 10 m m 10 10 40.000
ii) Depth between 10 m to 20 m m 10 10 40.000
1.10 12.37 Pile Load Test on single Vertical Pile in in accordance
(a) with IS:2911(Part-IV) as per MORT&H clause No.-1100
Abutment no 1.00 1.000
Pier no 0.00 0.000
1.11 12.37 Lateral load test on single Vertical Pile in accordance
(b) with IS:2911(Part-IV) as per MORT&H clause No.-1100
Abutment no 0.00 0.000
Pier no 1.00 1.000
B. Sub-Structure Work
1.12 13.5 G Plain Cement Concrete / Reinforced Cement Concrete M-
(p) 30 Grade with Batching Plant, Transit Mixer and
Case-II Concrete Pump. Height upto 5m in Substructure but
excluding reinforcement all complete job. as per
drawings and Technical Specifications Sections 1500,
Refer (B) Abut. Sub-Structure (item No.-1+2+3+4+8) cum 71.614 2.00 143.229
Refer (B) Pier. Sub-Structure (item No.-2+3) cum 43.190 2.00 86.380
1.13 13.5 H PCC/RCC M-40 Grade with Batching Plant, Transit Mixer
(q) and Concrete Pump. in Secimic Reaction Block and
Case-II Pedestal excluding reinforcement all complete job. as
per drawings and Technical Specifications Sections
1500, 1700 and 2200.
Refer (B) Abut. Sub-Structure (item No.-5+6+7) cum 2.792 2.00 5.584
Refer (B) Pier. Sub-Structure (item No.-4+5+6) cum 4.336 2.00 8.672
1.14 13.10 Providing and laying of Filter media with granular
materials/stone crushed aggregates satisfying the
requirements laid down in clause 2504.2.2. of MoRTH
specifications to a thickness of not less than 600 mm with
smaller size towards the soil and bigger size towards the
wall and provided over the entire surface behind
abutment, wing wall and return wall to the full height
compacted to a firm condition complete as per drawing
and Technical Specification 710.1.4 of IRC : 78 & 2200
Refer (B) Abut. Sub-Structure (item No.-9) cum 57.15 2.00 114.298
61

one Pier
1.15 13.8 Providing weep holes in Brick masonry/Plain/ Reinforced
concrete abutment, wing wall/ return wall with 100 mm dia
AC pipe, extending through the full width of the structure
with slope of 1V :20H towards drawing foce. Complete as
per drawing and Technical Specifications as per Clause
2706 & 2200 of MORTH
Refer (B) Abut. Sub-Structure (item No.-10) no 64.00 2.00 128.000
1.16 13.6 Supplying, fitting and placing HYSD bar reinforcement in
sub-structure complete as per drawing and Technical
Specifications and Section 1600 & 2200 of MORTH
Refer Abut. Steel. (1. Sub-Structure) M.T. 6.814 2.00 13.628
Refer Pier. Steel. (1. Sub-Structure) M.T. 7.692 2.00 15.384
C. Super-Structure Work
1.17 14.1C Furnishing and Placing Reinforced/ Prestressed cement
(ii) (p) concrete M30 in super-structure as per drawing and
Case-II Technical Specification 1500 & 1600 1700 of MORTH
Using Batching Plant, Transit Mixer and Concrete Pump.
Refer Qty. of Superstructure (item No.-1) cum 318.387
1.18 14.2 Providing, supplying, fitting, fixing and placing HYSD bar
in super-structure as per drawing and Technical
Specification & section 1600 of MORTH
Refer Qty. of Superstructure (item No.-11) M.T. 79.040
1.19 14.4 Providing RCC M30 grade in wearing coat over deck
slab and approach slab as per drawing and Technical
Specification & MORTH clouse 2702
1.20 14.9 Providing Drainage Spot as per drawing and Technical
Specification & Section 2705 of MORTH
Refer Qty. of Superstructure (item No.-8) no 18.000
1.21 13.14 Supplying and fixing of bearings complete as per
drawings and Technical Specifications Section 2000 &
2200
a) Tar paper (Refer Qty. of Superstructure (item No.-7) sqm 6.400
b) Elastomeric bearing (Qty. of Superstructure (item No.-6) cucm 518400.000
c) Neoprene Pad for seismic block cucm 4800 43200 96000.000
1.22 14.22 Providing and laying of Strip Seal expension Joints
catering to maximum horizontal movement p to 70mm,
complete as per drawings and standard Specifications to
be installed by the manufacture/Supplier or their
authorised representative ensuring complete to the
manufacturers instructions for installation. Clause No.
Refer Qty. of Superstructure (item No.-9) m 64.000
1.23 14.7 Construction of RCC railing of M30 Grade, complete as
per approved drawings and technical specifications &
section 2703, 1500, 1600 & 1700 of MORTH
Refer Qty. of Superstructure (item No.-4) m 101.760
62

one Pier
1.24 8.22 Provision of an Reinforced cement concrete crash barrier
at the edges of the road, approaches to bridge structures
and medians, constructed with M-40 grade concrete with
HYSD reinforcement conforming to IRC:21
Refer Qty. of Superstructure (item No.-2b) m 101.760
1.25 14.1 PCC M15 Grade leveling course below approach slab
complete as per drawing and Technical specification and
clouse 2700 of MORTH
1.26 14.11 Reinforced cement concrete M30 approach slab including
reinforcement and formwork complete as per drawing and
Technical specification & Section 1500, 1600, 1700 &
2704 of MORTH
D. Bed / Slope Protection and Misc. Work
1.27 15.2 Providing and laying of boulder apron laid in wire crates
made with 4mm dia GI wire conforming to IS: 280 &
IS:4826 in 100mm x 100mm mesh (weaved diagonally)
Cum. 207.056
including 10 per cent extra for laps and joints laid with
stone boulders weighing not less than 40 kg each.
Technical specification Clause 2503 of MORTH
1.28 15.5 Providing and laying Filter material underneath pitching in
slopes complete as per drawing and Technical Cum. 316.668
specification specification Clause 2504 of MORTH
1.29 15.4 Providing and laying Pitching on slopes laid over
prepared filter media including boulder apron laid dry in
front of toe of embankment complete as per drawing and Cum. 633.336
Technical specifications. Technical specification Clause
2504 of MORTH
E. Construction of Diversion :
1.30 2.3 (ii) Clearing and grubbing road land including uprooting rank
vegetation, grass, bushes, shrubs, saplings and trees
girth up to 300 mm, removal of stumps of trees cut earlier
and disposal of unserviceable materials as per Technical
Specification Clause 201 of MORTH
A In the area of light Jungle. Sqm. 3800.000
1.31 3.2 Construction of embankment with approved material
obtained from borrow pits with all lifts and leads,
transporting to site, spreading, grading to required slope cum 11000.000
and compacting to meet requirement of table 300-2. and
as per Technical Specification Clause 305 of MORTH
1.32 12.39 Providing & Laying Plain Cement Concrete M-15 for H.P
bed. all complete job complete as per drawings and Cum. 152.946
Technical Specifications Sections 1100 & 1700
1.33 9.2 Laying Reinforced cement concrete pipe NP4/prestressed
concrete pipe for culverts on first class bedding of
granular material in single row including fixing collar with
cement mortar 1:2 but excluding excavation, protection m. 250.000
works, backfilling, concrete and masonry works in head
walls and parapets. and as per Technical Specification
Clause 2900 of MORTH
63

one Pier
1.34 4.2 (i) Construction of Granular sub-base by providing coarse
graded material, spreading in uniform layers with motor
grader on prepared surface, mixing by mix in place cum 219.000
method with rotavator at OMC, and compacting with
vibratory roller to achieve the desired density, complete
1.35 4.12 Providing, laying, spreading and compacting Wet Mix
Macadam specification including premixing the Material
with water at OMC in mechanical mix plant on well Cum. 280.000
prepared surface and compacting with vibratory roller to
achieve the desired density. Clause 406 of MORTH
1.36 5.1 Prime coat (Providing and applying primer coat with
bitumen emulsion on prepared surface of granular Base
including clearing of road surface and spraying primer at Sqm. 2450.000
the rate of 0.60 kg/sqm using mechanical means.
Specification Clause 502) of MORTH
1.37 5.2 Providing and applying tack coat with bitumen emulsion
using emulsion pressure distributor at the rate of 0.20 kg
per sqm on the prepared bituminous/granular surface Sqm. 4900.000
cleaned with mechanical broom. Specification Clause 503
of MORTH
Providing and laying Bituminous Macadam using crushed
aggregates of specified grading premixed with bituminous
binder, transported to site, laid over a previously prepared
cum. 70.000
surface with paver finisher to the required grade, level
and alignment and rolled as per technical specification
Clause 505 of MORTH
1.38 5.7 Providing and laying Semi Dense Bituminous Concrete
using crushed aggregates of specified grading, premixed
with bituminous binder transporting the hot mix to work
site, laying with a hydrostatic paver finisher with sensor
cum. 42.000
control to the required grade, level and alignment, rolling
with smooth wheeled, vibratory and tandem rollers to
achieve the desired compaction as per MoRTH
specification clause No. 508 complete in all respects.
F. Miscellenious :
1.39 14.16 Painting on concrete surface (Providing and applying 2
coats of water based cement paint to unplastered
concrete surface after cleaning the surface of dirt, dust,
sqm. 3650.000
oil, grease, efflorescence and applying paint @ of 1 litre
for 2 Sq.m. ) all complete as per drawings and Technical
Specifications Clause 800
64
SUPERSTRUCTURE SPAN = 14.00 m. No. of Span = 3.0 No.

16000
16.000
200 450 450 200
1500 11000 1500
11.000
0.4752400 2625
RCC Railing 2625 2625 2625 0.475 2400
Wearimg Coat C/L of Bridge
Wearing Coat
2.5% Slope 250 L

C of Carriageway
2.5%2.5Slope
% Slope 1.01
2.5 % Slope
200 200
100 300 Haunch 150
Haunch
Construction 300X150 2.166 Haunch
150X87 Drainage
300 Joint 1350
#N/A 300 550 0.300
550 Spout
Neoprene Bearing 400 Pedustal
0.5x0.36x0.096
Cap
Details of Superstructure
Input :
Conc in s/s = 106.129 cum / span
Steel = 26.080 M.T./span
Drainage spout/span = 6 nos.
Length of approach slab = 3.600 m
Thick of approach slab = 0.300 m
Width of bridge = 16.000 m
Carriageway 11.000
Railing Type RCC Railing/crash barrier
Thick of lean conc below appr. Slab = 0.150 m
Effective Span= 14.000 m
Overall Span 14.560
No. of spans = 3.000
Thick of wearing coat = 0.075 m
Neoprene Bearing 50.0 36.0 9.6 cm
No. of Longitudinal girders = 5.000
Detailed Quantity Computation of Superstructure :
1. M30 in Deck Slab as per MOST = 3 x 106.13 = 318.39 cum
2. Approach Slab = 2 x 3.6 x 0.3 x 16 = 34.56 cum
3. Lvl course M15 in appr. = 2 x 3.75 x 0.15 x 16 = 18.00 cum
4a. RCC Railing = 2 x (14.56 x 3 + 2 x 3.6) = 101.76 m
4b. Crash Bariar = 2 x (14.56 x 3 + 2 x 3.6) = 101.76 m
5. RCC Wearing Coat = 11 x 3 x 14.56 x 0.075 = 36.04 cum
6. Neoprene Bearing = 15 x 50 x 36 x 9.6 x 2 5,18,400.00 cucm
7. Tar paper bearing = 2 x 16 x 0.20 = 6.40 sqm
8. Drainage Spout = 3x6= 18.00 nos.
9. Expansion joint = (3 + 1) x 16 = 64.00 m
10. Asphaltic Plug joint = 2 x 16 = 32.00 m
11. (i) Steel in s/s - (Deck & Girder) = 26.08 x 3 = 78.24 M.T.
(ii) Steel in approach slab = 0.80 M.T.
Total steel in superstructure and approach slab= 79.04 M.T.
65
QUANTITY CALCULATION OF SUPERSTRUCTURE

1 CONCRETE IN S/S
Effective span = 14.000 m
Longitudinal Overhang = 0.280 m
Overall Span 14.560 m
average thickness of deck slab = 250 mm
Long girders
number of girders = 5
spacing of main girders = 2.625 m
depth = 1,350.00 mm
Central width = 300 mm
Support Width = 550 mm
Central Straight Length = 11.360 m
Support Straight length = 0.700 m
Tapper Length 0.90 m
Cross girder
number of girders = 4
depth = 700 mm
width = 300 mm
Width of bridge = 16.000 m
canitlever length = 2.400 m
Concrete in deck = 14.56 x 16 x 0.25 = 58.240 m3
long girder-Straight = 5 x (0.7 x 0.55 x 1.35 x 2) = 5.198 m3
long girder-Tapper 5 x (0.85)/2 x 0.9 x 1.35 x 2) 5.164 m3
long girder-Central = 5 x (11.36 x 0.3 x 1.35) = 23.004 m3
Cross girder 4 x 11.05 x 0.3 x 0.7 9.282 m3
Haunch (8 x 0.3 x 0.15 )x 14.56 5.242 m4
Total Concrete in s/s = 106.129 m3/span
66
Quantity Computation of Abutment (Concrete)

Exp. Gap 0.040 Design Span- 14.000
3.697 0.280 Long. Overhang Standard Span- 14.000
Dirtwall Thk. 0.300 RL-100.403 Formation Level
0.6
thick = 0.300 2.166

1.66
RL-98.748 Top of Abutment Cap
1.22 0.500
RL-98.248 Bottom of Abutment Cap
c1= 1.50 0.600 0.800 0.220
Thk. Filter
3.75
26.56 3.250
deg 0.800
10.815 RL-94.000 Bed Level
2.150 2.150 RL-94.998 Top of Pile Cap
1.800
RL-93.198 Bottom of Pile cap
0.15 Lvl. Course
RL-93.587 Scour Level
22.0
RL-71.248 Founding Level

1.20 0.7
5.10 Long. 1.4

c1= 1.50 Reaction
0.75 Block
0.35
3.60 0.80
7.40 Seismic
0.80 Reaction
16.00 3.60 Block
0.80
16.3 Neoprene Pad=40cmx20cmx3cm= 2400.0
0.800 No. of Pile in Long. Dir= 2

3.60 No. of Pile in Trans. Dir= 4
14.80
Grade of Concrete
Substructure 30
0.75 Seismic block 40
0.75 3.60 0.00 0.75 Foundation 35
No. of piles = 8 Diameter of Pile= 1.20
67
Angle of internal friction of backfill soil = 30 deg

Thickness of Cantilever Return = 0.30 m
Length of Cantilever = 3.65 m
Thickess of Pedastal = 0.15 m
Length of Pedastal = 0.800 m
Width of Pedastal = 0.660 m
No. of Pedastal = 5 nos
Length of Bearing = 0.500 m
Width of Bearing = 0.360 m
Thickness of Bearing = 0.096 m
No. of Bearing = 5 nos
Corbel Size = 0.2 0.18 0.12
Abutment Cap Length = 16.000 m
Abutment Shaft Length = 16.000 m
Length of Foundation Slab = 16.300 m
Length of Levelling Course = 16.6 m
Width of Levelling course = 5.4
Length of Approach Slab = 3.6 m
Thickness of Approach Slab = 0.3 m
Length of Levelling Course = 3.75 m
Thickness of Levelling Course = 0.15 m
Spacing of Weep Holes = 1 m
No. of Weep holes in Shaft in vertical Direction = 4.0 nos
No. of Weep holes in Width of Abutment = 16 nos
Depth of Earthwork in Cutting 0.952 = 0.950 m
Clearance around the Found. slab for ease in casting = 0.3 m
Width of Cutting of foundation = 5.7 m
Length of Cutting of foundation Slab = 17.2 m
Detailed Quantity Computation :
(A) Abutment Foundation :
1. E/W in excavation for pile caps = 0.95 x 5.7 x 17.2 = 93.334 cum
2. E/W back filling in foundation trenches 93.334 - (13.446 - 149.634) = -69.746 cum
3. Granular back fill 0.5 x 10.815 x (100.403-94.998) x 16 = 467.641 cum
4. Levelling Course below Pile Cap 16.6 x 5.4 x 0.15 = 13.446 cum
5. Pile Cap 16.3 x 5.1 x 1.8 = 149.634 cum
6. Empty Boring of piles = 8 x (94-93.198+0.15) = 7.616 m
7. Steel Liner Length = (93.198-93.587) = 0.000 m
8. Driving of piles 8 x 21.95 = 175.600 m
9. Conc. in piles 8 x pi()/4 x 1.2^2 x 21.95 = 198.599 cum
(B) Abutment Sub-structure :
1. Abutment Shaft 3.25 x (0.8+0.8) / 2 x 16 = 41.600 cum
Average qty of Shaft/m height = 12.80 cum
2. Abutment Cap 1.22 x 0.5 x 16+ ((1.22+0.8)/2 x 0.22 x 16) = 13.315 cum
3. Dirtwall '(100.403-98.748) x 0.3 x 16 = 7.944 cum
4. Corbel {(0.18 + (0.18 + 0.12)} / 2 x 0.2 x 16 = 0.768 cum
5. Pedastal 5 x 0.66 x 0.8 x 0.15 = 0.396 cum
68
6. Transverse seismic reaction block 0.8 x 0.8 x 0.8 x 2 = 1.024 cum

7. Longitudinal seismic reaction block 0.7 x 0.35 x 1.4 x 4 = 1.372 cum
8. Cantilever Return {2 x (0.6+1.655) / 2 x 1.5 x 0.3)}+{(100.403-
94.998)x2.15 x 0.3)x2} = 7.987 cum
9. Filter behind Abutment 0.6 x (100.403-94-0.3-0.15) x 16 = 57.15 cum
10. Weep Holes in Abut 4 x 16 = 64.00 nos
11. Back Fill behind abutment 0.5 x 3.697 x (100.403-94) x 16 = 189.38 cum
69
Quantity Computation of Abutment (Steel)

b14
b14
Cover in substructure= 0.05 m
Cover in foundation= 0.075 m
Bend in link and stirrups= 0.1 m
b15 b7 Bend in main bar= 0.3 m
b16 500 b8
b11
b15 b10
b16
0.5 b8
b2
b7
b3(BF)
b13 b1
b1
b12 b4
b6 b5
e2 e4
e6
300 e5
allaround
d
e3 e8 e1 e8
e7 e7
e6
Details of Pile
70
Sl. BAR LENGTH NOS TOTAL

LOCATION SHAPE DIA SPACING WEIGHT
No. MARKED of Bar of Bar LENGTH
1. (A) Abutment Sub-structure
1 Earth Face of Shaft b1 16 6.184 100 618.4 976.043

Length=0.5+0.5/2+3.25+1.8-0.075-0.025-0.016+0.5=6.184
2 River Face of Shaft b2 16 6.184 100 618.4 976.043

Length=0.5+0.5/2+3.25+1.8-0.075-0.025-0.016+0.5=6.184
3 Side Face of Shaft b3 16 6.184 4 24.736 39.042

Length=0.5+0.5/2+3.25+1.8-0.075-0.025-0.016+0.5=6.184
0.85 1078 916.3 813.504
4 Link Shaft b4 12 320.8081
Length=(0.8+0.8)*0.5-2*0.05+2*0.075=0.85 Nos.=49*22=1078
16.188 22 356.136 316.183
5 Earth Face distribution b5 12 150
Length=16-2*0.05-0.012+2*0.15=16.188 Nos.=3.25*1000/150=22
16.188 22 356.136 316.183
6 River Face distribution b6 12 150
Length=16-2*0.05-0.012+2*0.15=16.188 Nos.=3.25*1000/150=22
2.675 80 214 337.764
7 Dirtwall River Face b7 16 200
Length=0.30+1.655+0.5+ 0.22=2.675 Nos.=(16-2*0.05-0.016)*1000/200
3.425 80 274 168.931

8 Dirtwall Earth Face b8 10 200
Length=(1.655-0.05+0.3-2*0.05+0.5+0.22+0.3+0.6)=3.425 Nos.=(16-2*0.050-0.01)*1000/200
15.89 16 254.24 156.749
9 Dirtwall distribution(BF) b9 10 200
Length=16-2*0.05-0.01=15.89 Nos.=(100.403-98.748-2*0.05)*1000*2/200
3.24 106 343.44 304.911
10 Abutment Cap b10 12 150
Length=(0.5+1.22-2*0.05)*2=3.24 Nos.=(16-2*0.05-0.012)*1000/150
1.411 108 152.388 135.292

11 Abutment Cap b10 0.311 12 150
Length=(0.25+0.8+0.311+0.25-4*0.05)=1.411
15.9 20 318 282.325
12 Abutment Cap b11 12 150
Length=16-2*0.05=15.9 Nos.=(1.22-2*0.05-2*0.012)*1000/150*2+4=20
3.7 70 259 229.944

13 Cant. Ret. Horz. Bar R/F b12 12 150
Avg. Length=(4.45+2.95)/2=3.7 Nos.=((5.405-2*0.05)*1000/150)*2=70
71

sub-structure, continued………
3.7 70 259 159.683
14 Cant. Ret. Horz. Bar E/F b13 10 150
Avg. Length=(4.45+2.95)/2=3.7 Nos.=((5.405-2*0.05)*1000/150)*2=70
6.45 6 38.7 61.082
15 Cant. Ret. Top bar b14 16
Length=0.30+3.65+0.6+1.5-2*0.05+0.5
5.605 48 269.04 238.858
16 Cant. Ret. Vert. dist. bar b15 12 150
Length=((5.705)-2*0.05=5.605 Nos.=(3.65-0.05)*1000/150
5.605 48 269.04 165.873
17 Cant. Ret. Bottom bar b16 10 150
Length=((5.705)-2*0.05=5.605
6.35 6 38.1 0.000
18 Cant. Ret. Bottom bar b16 (b) 10
Length=(3.75+1.8+0.30)-0.1+0.3
Total Steel in Substructure= 5678.410
5% Extra for laps & wastage = 283.921
Total Steel in Substructure IN KG = 5962.331
B. Transverse Seismic Block :
0.7 1 0.7 2.697
1 Trans. Seis. Block b17 25
Length=0.8-2*0.05
2.1 7 14.7 56.644
Length=0.8+0.8-2*0.05+0.6
3.15 8 25.2 22.373
Length=(0.8+0.8+0.8+0.8-4*0.05+0.15)
3.45 6 20.7 18.378
Length=(0.8+0.8+0.8-3*0.05)+2*0.60
1.35 7 9.45 5.826
Length=0.8-0.05+0.6
Steel for One Transverse Seismic block= 105.918
Steel for 2 Nos of Transverse Seismic block= 211.836
Total Steel in Transverse Seismic block IN KG = 222.428
72
C. Longitudinal Seismic Block :

0.6 1 0.6 1.480
1 Lang. Seis. Block d20 20
Length=(0.7-2*0.05)
2.25 7 15.75 38.842
2 Lang.. Seis. Block d21 20
Length={(0.35+1.4)-2*0.05+0.6)}
2.05 8 16.4 25.885
Length=(0.7+0.35+0.7+0.35)-4*0.05+0.15)
4.55 4 18.2 28.726
Length=(1.4+0.7+1.4-3*0.05)+2*0.60
1.95 7 13.65 8.416
Length=(1.4-0.05+0.6)
Steel for One Longitudinal Seismic block= 103.349
Steel for 4 Nos of Longitudinal Seismic block= 413.396
Total Steel in Longitudinal seismic block IN KG = 434.066
D. Pedastal (One Abutment) :
Main Bar 2.40 9 21.6 13.317
1 10 75
(Longitudinal Direction) Length=(0.5+0.3+0.8+0.5+0.3) (0.66)*1000/75)
Main Bar 2.26 11 24.86 15.327
2 10 75
(Transverse Direction) Length=(0.5+0.3+0.66+0.5+0.3) (0.8)*1000/75)
3.22 1 3.22 1.985

3 Stirrups of pile 10 150
Length=(0.8+0.66+0.15)*2 (0.15)*1000/150)
Mesh Reinforcement 1.28 13 16.58 6.540

4 8 75
Type A
Length=(0.6+0.15)+(0.375+0.15)
Steel for One Pedastal= 37.169
Steel for 5 Nos of Pedastal= 185.845
Total Steel in Pedastal IN KG = 195.137
Total Reinforcement in Sub-Structure (A+B+C+D)=(5962.331+222.428+434.066+195.137) in KG = 6813.961
73

2. Foundation
8.23 108 888.3 3422.939
1 Long. Bottom of pile cap e1 25 150
Length=5.1+1.65*2-2*0.075-0.025 Nos.=(16.3-2*0.075-0.025)*1000/150
8.23 108 889.272 1403.570

2 Long. Top of pile cap e2 16 150
Length=5.1+1.65*2-2*0.075-0.016 Nos.=(16.3-2*0.075-0.016)*1000/150
19.43 33 641.322 1012.222

3 Trans. Bottom of pile cap e3 16 150
Length=16.3+1.65*2-3*0.075-0.016 Nos.=(5.1-2*0.075-0.016)*1000/150
19.43 33 641.322 1012.222

4 Trans. Top of pile cap e4 16 150
Length=16.3+1.65*2-3*0.075-0.016 Nos.=(5.1-2*0.075-0.016)*1000/150
42.4 4 169.6 267.686

5 Side Face Bar allaround e5 16
Length=(16.3-2*0.075+5.1-2*0.075)*2+2*0.1
23.9 200 4780 18419.060

6 Main bar of Pile e6 25
Length=0.30+21.95+1.35+0.3 Nos=25*8
3.42 880 3009.6 1855.531

7 Stirrups of pile e7 10 200
Length=3.1416*(1.2-2*0.075-0.025)+2*0.1 Nos.=21.95*8*1000/200
1.85 2160 3996 2463.684

8 Link in Pile Cap e8 10 300
Length=1.8-2*0.075+2*0.1 10 legged Nos.=(2.15*1000/300)*2*10
Pressuring Ring 3.23 87.8 283.594 174.846

9 10
(inner ring)
Nos.=21.95*1000*8/2000
Total Steel = 29856.914
Total Steel in Foundation = 31349.760
9 Steel Liner Outer dia.= 1.216 Inner dia.= 1.20 Area of c/s of liner= 0.03 Length= 0 Weight= 0
74
Quantity Computation of Pier (Concrete)

Long. Overhan0.280 Design Span- 14.000
Exp. Gap 0.040 Standard Span- 14.000
RL-100.403 Formation Level
2.166
RL-98.748 Top of Pier Cap

1.8 0.500
At centre 0.583 0.500 RL-97.748 Bottom of Pier Cap
Avg.@ cant. 0.391 1
3.75
2.750
26.555 deg 1.000
RL-93.593 Bed Level
2.050 2.050 RL-94.998 Top of Pile Cap
1.800
0.15 Lvl. Course
22.000

1.20
13.200
0.500
0.500
2.256
0.1 m Typ.
0.500 7.600 0.500

RL-94.998 Top of Pile Cap

0.15 Lvl. Course
1.20
75
5.100
##
Tr. Seismic
0.75 0.80 Reaction
Block
1.10
7.200 Neoprene Pad=80cmx20cmx3cm= 4800.0
8.600 3.6 0.70
8.700
1.00 Long. Seis.
1 Reaction
3.6 Block
7.2 0.35
Neoprene Pad=40cmx20cmx3cm= 2400.0
0.75 No. of Pile in Long. Dir= 2

0.75 3.60 0 0.75 No. of Pile in Trans. Dir= 3
No. of piles = 6 Diameter of Pile= 1.2

Thickess of Pedastal = 0.15 m
Length of Pedastal = 0.8 m
Width of Pedastal = 0.66 m
No. of Pedastal = 5 nos
Length of Bearing = 0.500 m
Width of Bearing = 0.360 m
Thickness of Bearing = 0.096 m
No. of Bearing = 5 nos
Thickness of Levelling Course = 0.15 m
Length of Levelling Course = 9m
Width of Levelling course 5.4
Depth of Earthwork in Cutting 0.545 = 0.550 m
Clearance around the Pile Cap for ease in casting = 0.3 m
Width of Cutting of foundation = 5.7 m
Length of Cutting of foundation Slab = 9.6 m
Detailed Quantity Computation :
(A) Pier Foundation :
1. E/W in excavation for pile caps = 0.55 x 5.7 x 9.6 = 29.822 cum
2. Earh work in back fill 29.822 - (7.29 + 79.866) = 0.000 cum
3. Levelling Course below Pile Cap 9 x 5.4 x 0.15 = 7.290 cum
4. Pile Cap 8.7 x 5.1 x 1.8 = 79.866 cum
5. Empty Boring of piles = 6 x (93.593-93.198+0.15) = 3.270 m
6. Steel Liner Length= (93.198-92.354) = 0.850 m
7. Driving of piles - 6 x 22 = 132.000 m
8. Conc. in piles - 6 x pi()/4 x 1.2^2 x 22 = 149.288 cum
76
(B) Pier Sub-structure :

1. Avg. Width of Shaft (1 + 1) / 2 = 1.000 m
2 .Pier Shaft ((8.6-1)x1+PI()*1^2/4)x2.75 = 23.060 cum
Average qty of Shaft/m height 8.385 cum
3. Pier Cap
Avg. width of pier cap along traffic direction= (1.8+1+2*0.1)/2 = 1.50 m
Avg. length of pier cap along current direction=(13.2+8.6+2*0.1)/2 = 11 m
Concrete in rectangular part of pier cap= 1.8x13.2x0.5 = 11.88
Concrete in trapezoidal part of pier cap= 1.5x11x0.5 = 8.25
Total quantity in Pier Cap = 20.130 cum
4. Pedastal (5 x 0.8 x 0.66 x 0.15) x 2 = 0.792 cum
5. Longitudinal seismic reaction block (0.35 x 1 x 0.7 x 4) x 2 = 1.960 cum
6. Transverse seismic reaction block (0.9 x 0.8 x 1.1) x 2 1.584 cum
77
Quantity Computation of Pier (Steel)

d7 d14 d10
d19
d15, d17
d16, d18
d12 d8, d9
d13
Cover in substructure= 0.05 m
Cover in foundation= 0.075 m
Bend in link and stirrups= 0.1 m
Bend in main bar= 0.3 m
d1
d2 d3
(d4+d5+d6)
b6 b5
e9 e11
e12 e14
allaround
e10 e13 e8 e13 d

e15
e15
e14
Details of Pile
78

1. (A) Pier Sub-structure
1 Shaft main reinforcemen d1 25 6.234 25 155.85 600.546

Length=0.3+3.75+1.8-0.075-0.025-0.016+0.5
2 Shaft main reinforcemen d2 25 6.234 25 155.85 600.546

Length=0.3+3.75+1.8-0.075-0.025-0.016+0.5
3 Pier Nose Main bar d3 25 6.234 8 49.872 192.175

Length=0.3+3.75+1.8-0.075-0.025-0.016+0.5
1.613 364 587.132 521.264

4 Link in Shaft d4 12 200
Length=(1+2.05)*0.5-2*0.05-0.012+2*0.1=1.613 Nos.=13*28=364
Pier nosing distribution 1.99 28 55.72 49.469
5 reinforcement d5 12 200
(Both side) Length=(1-2*0.05-0.012)*PI()/2+2*0.3=1.99 Nos.=2.75*1000/200x2=28
Pier shaft distribtion 17.18 28 480.928 426.975
6 reinforcement in d6 12 200
straight portion Length=(7.6+1-2*0.05-0.012)*2+2*0.1=17.176 Nos.=2.75*1000/200x2=28
Pier Cap top 2.188 44 96.272 85.472
7 Longitudinal d7 12 300
Reinforcement Length=1.8-2*0.05-0.012+2*0.25 Nos.=(13.2-2*0.050-0.012)*1000/300
Pier Cap bottom Long. 2.75 29 79.75 70.803

8 d8 12 300
Reinf. in cental portion Length=(1+2*0.1-2*0.05-0.016+2*0.583+2*0.25=2.75 Nos.=(8.8-2*0.050-0.012)*1000/300
Pier Cap bottom Long. 2.37 14 33.18 29.458
9 Reinf. in cantilever d9 12 300
portion Length=(1+2*0.1-2*0.05-0.016+2*0.391+2*0.25=2.37 Nos.=(((13.2-8.6-2*0.1)/2-0.05)*1000/300)*2
Pier Cap top 13.58 22 298.76 1151.230

10 Transverse d10 25
Reinforcement Length=(13.2-2*0.05-0.025+2*0.5/2=13.58
Pier cap side inclind 11.6 4 46.4 73.235

11 face in transverse d12 16
direction Length=(8.6+2*0.1+13.2)/2+2*0.3=11.6
79
Sl. LOCATION BAR SHAPE DIA SPACING LENGTH NOS TOTAL WEIGHT
sub-structure, continued………
Pier Cap bottom 13.7 11 150.7 237.855

12 Transverse d13 16
Reinforcement Length=(8.6+2*0.1+2*2.256-2*0.05-0.016+2*0.25)=13.7
4.58 16 73.28 65.059

Pier cap Hrz. Strps.
13 d14 12
(2 Legged)
Length=(1.8-2*0.05-0.012+0.3*2)*2*8=4.58
3.572 44 157.168 248.064

Pier cap Vert. strps .
14 d15 16 100
(2 Legged)
Length=(1+2*0.1+0.5+0.25)*2-8*0.05-8*0.016+2*0.1=3.572 Nos.=((13.2-8.6-2*0.1)/2)*2*1000/100
2.636 44 115.984 183.062

Pier cap Vert. strps.
15 d16 16 100
(2 Legged) Length=((1+2*0.1)/2+0.5+0.25)*2-4*0.05-4*0.016+2*0.1=2.636 Nos.=((13.2-8.6-2*0.1)/2)*2*1000/100
4.104 176 722.304 641.272

16 d17 12 100
(2 Legged)
Length=(1+2*0.1+0.5+0.5)*2-8*0.05-8*0.012+2*0.1+2*0.1=4.104 Nos=(8.6+2*0.1)*2*1000/100
3.152 176 554.752 492.517

17 d18 12 100
(2 Legged)
Length=((1+2*0.1)/2+0.5+0.5)*2-4*0.05-4*0.012+2*0.1=3.152 Nos=(8.6+2*0.1)*2*1000/100
29.67 4 118.68 187.317

18 Pier cap side face bar d19 16
Length=(13.2+1.8)*2-8*0.05-8*0.016+2*0.1=29.67
Total Steel in Substructure= 5856.319

Total Steel in Substructure IN KG = 6149.135
80
B. Longitudinal Seismic Block :

0.6 1 0.6 1.480
Length=(0.7-2*0.05)
1.85 7 12.95 31.937
Length={(0.35+1)-2*0.05+0.6)}
2.05 8 16.4 25.885
Length=(0.35+0.7+0.35+0.7-4*0.05+0.15)
3.75 4 15 23.675
Length=(1+0.7+1-3*0.05)+2*0.60
1.55 7 10.85 6.689
Length=(1-0.05+0.6)
Steel for One Longitudinal Seismic block= 89.666
Steel for 8 Nos of Longitudinal Seismic block= 717.328
Total Steel in Longitudinal seismic block IN KG = 753.194
C. Transverse Seismic Block :
1.0 1 1 3.853
1 Trans. Seis. Block d25 25
Length=(1.1-2 x 0.05)
2.2 11 24.2 93.251
Length=(0.8+0.9-2*0.05+0.6)
3.95 10 39.5 35.069
Length=(0.9+1.1+0.9+1.1-4*0.05+0.15)
3.95 14 55.3 49.096
Length=(0.9+1.1+0.9-3*0.05)+2*0.60
1.35 11 14.85 9.156
Length=(0.8-0.05+0.6)
Steel for One Transverse Seismic block= 190.425
Steel for 2 Nos of Transverse Seismic block= 380.850
Total Steel in Transverse Seismic block IN KG = 399.893
81
D. Pedastal (One Pier) :

Main Bar
2.40 9 21.6 13.317
1 (Longitudinal 10 75
Direction)
Length=(0.5+0.3+0.8+0.5+0.3) (0.66)*1000/75)
Main Bar 2.26 11 24.86 15.327

2 10 75
(Transverse Direction)
Length=(0.5+0.3+0.66+0.5+0.3) (0.8)*1000/75)
3.22 1 3.22 1.985

3 Stirrups of pile 10 150
Length=(0.8+0.66+0.15)*2 (0.15)*1000/150)
Mesh Reinforcement 1.28 13 16.58 6.540

4 8 75
Type A
Length=(0.6+0.15)+(0.375+0.15)
Steel for One Pedastal= 37.169
Steel for 10 Nos of Pedastal= 371.690
Total Steel in Pedastal IN KG = 390.275
Total Reinforcement in Sub-Structure (A+B+C+D)=(6149.135+753.194+399.893+390.275) in KG = 7692.496
82

2. Foundation
Long. Bottom of pile 8.525 57 485.925 1872.444

1 e8 25 150
cap Length=5.1+1.8*2-2*0.075-0.025 Nos.=(8.7-2*0.075-0.025)*1000/150
8.525 57 485.925 766.953

2 Long. Top of pile cap e9 16 150
Length=5.1+1.8-4*0.075-0.016 Nos.=(8.7-2*0.075-0.016)*1000/150
8.525 33 281.325 444.025

Trans. Bottom of pile
3 e10 16 150
cap Length=5.1+1.8-4*0.075-0.016 Nos.=(5.1-2*0.075-0.016)*1000/150
8.525 33 281.325 444.025

4 Trans. Top of pile cap e11 16 150
Length=5.1+1.8-4*0.075-0.016 Nos.=(5.1-2*0.075-0.016)*1000/150
Side Face Bar 27.2 4 108.8 171.723

5 e12 16
allaround Length=(8.7-2*0.075+5.1-2*0.075)*2+2*0.1
1.85 735 1359.75 838.337

6 Main bar of Pile e13 10 300
Length=1.8-2*0.075+2*0.1 10 legged Nos.=(2.05*1000/300)*2*10
23.95 150 3592.5 13843.195

7 Main bar of Pile e14 25
Length=22+1.8*0.75+0.3+0.3
3.42 660 2257.2 1391.649

8 Stirrups of pile e15 10 200
Length=3.1416*(1.2-2*0.075-0.025)+2*0.1 Nos.=22*1000/1200
Pressuring Ring 3.23 66 213.18 131.433

8 10
(inner ring)
Nos.=22*6*1000/2000
Total Steel = 19903.784
Total Steel in Foundation = 20898.973
9 Steel Liner Outer dia.= 1.216 Inner dia.= 1.20 Area of c/s of liner= 0.03 Length= 5.1 Weight= 1.20105
83
Protection Work :
Boulder Pitching
in slope
Slope 2:1
Earthen Shoulder
8450
7000
3600 300
Earthen Shoulder
Slope 2:1
hl
sl cl
Boulder Pitching
in slope
Plan Showing Boulder Pitching at Abutment
A. Boulder Pitching arround Bridge portion B. Boulder Pitching in Ditch portion

Formation Level of bridge at abutment location = RL-100.403
Bed level at front of the pile cap at abutment locati = RL-94.000 Boulder pitching in Embankment Slope in ditch portion :
Height if fill = 6.403 m Height of fill 11.403 m
Consider embankment slope ratio as (ver:horz) = 1: 2 Embankment slope 1: 2
Width of Abutment wall in transverse direction = 14.8 m Hrizontal projection of slope 22.806 m.
Hrizontal projection of slope hl= 12.806 m Inclined length 25.50 m.
Slope length of embankment at abutment location = 14.318 m Length of Boulder pitching 30.0 m.
Slope length beyond abutment in logitudinal direction= 2 m Quantity (Boulder pitching) = 2 x (30 x 25.5 x 0.3) = 0 cum.
Toe length of the slope = 1.5 m Quantity (Filter Materials) = 2 x (30 x 25.5 x 0.15) = 0 cum.
Straight length of boulder pitching sl= 30 m
Straight length in between Bridges 0 m
Circular length of boulder pitching cl= 12.806 m Quantity (Boulder at Toe) = 2 x (30 x 0.6 x 1.5) = 0 cum.
Thickness of boulder pitching on slope = 0.3 m
Thickness of filter = 0.15 m
Thickness crated boulder at toe = 0.60 m
Area of boulder pitchig on slope = 2111.121 sqm
Legth of toe around boulder pitching = 230.062 m Total (A+B)
01. Boulder Pitching on embankment slope= (4 x (12.81 x 30 + 0.25 x 3.14159 x 12.81^2) + 2 x 2 x 14.8 x 0.3 633.336 cum
02. Filter on embankment slope= (4 x (12.81 x 30 + 0.25 x 3.14159 x 12.81^2) + 2 x 2 x 14.8 x 0.15 316.668 cum
03. Crated Boulder apron at the toe (4 x (30 + 0.5 x 12.81) + 2 x 14.8 x 1.5 207.056 cum
84
Proposed Diversion
Formation width
Embankment (varies) 9.00 Embankment (varies)
5.00 1.00 Carriageway width 1.00 5.00

Earthen 7.00 Earthen
Flank Flank
3% 3% FRL #REF!
#REF!
2.5 m. Varies 500.00 mm. Sub-grade 2
1
GL #REF!
1.0m dia Hume 19.0 m. Varries

pipe (2 row) GSB 150.0 mm.
WMM 200.0 mm.
DBM 50.0 mm.
BC 30.0 mm.
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION

(Diversion)
Input : 6 Bottom width of Lower end 25.0
1 Length of Diversion 200.0 m. on either side m.
2 Carriageway width 7.0 m. 10 Bed Level #REF! RL
3 Formation Wwidth 9.00 m. 11 Width of Sub grade #REF! m.
4 Earthen Flank 1.000 m. on either side 12 Bottom width of drainage layer #REF! mm
5 Maximum Ht. at Bridge side 3.0 m.
6 Minimum Ht. at other end 4.0 m.
85
Detailed Quantity Computation of Diversion :
Earth work :
1 Clearing and grubbing of original ground along the approach :
Area = 200 x 19 3800.00 sqm.
2 Earth work filling in embankment… all complete job
a C/S area at Higher end (19 + 9) / 2 x 3 = 42.00 sqm.

b C/S area at Lower end (9 + 25) / 2 x 4 = 68.00 sqm.
Quantity = 1 x 200 x ( 42 + 68 ) / 2 = 11000.00 cum.
3 Length of each row = 9 + (2.5-1) x 2 = 12.00 m.

Nos. of Pipe in each Row = 12 / 2.5 = 4.80 m. say 5.00 m.
There fore length of each row = 5 x 2.5 = 12.50 m.
Hume Pipe (20 row)= 12.5 x 20 = = 250.00 m.
4 E/ w in excavation for bedding = 12 x 0.435 x 29.3 = 152.95 cum.
5 PCC M15 in bedding below H.P = 12 x 0.435 x 29.3 = 152.95 cum.
6 Providing GSB in Full Formation = 200 x9.3 x 0.15 = 219.00 cum.

7 Providing WMM 200 mm. in 7 m. = 200 x 7 x 0.2 = 280.00 cum.
8 Providing DBM 50 mm. in 7 m. = 200 x 7 x 0.05 = 70.00 cum.
9 Providing BC 30 mm. in 7 m. = 200 x 7 x 0.03 = 42 cum.
86
5. Analysis of Rates
87
(A) Usage Rates of Plant and Machinery

Output of Rate
Sl. No. Description of Machine Activity Output Unit
Machine (input)
capacity in
P&M-001 Air Compressor General Purpose 170/250 hour 417.00
cfm
Batching and Mixing Plant (a) 30 cum
P&M-002 Concrete Mixing cum/hour 20 hour 2596.00
capacity
Batching and Mixing Plant (b) 15 - 20 cum
P&M-003 Concrete Mixing cum/hour 13 hour 1558.00
capacity
Applying bitumen tack

P&M-004 Bitumen Pressure Distributor sqm/hour 1750 hour 1397.00
coat
capacity in
P&M-005 Bitumen Boiler oil fired Bitumen Spraying 1500 hour 258.00
litre
Paving of concrete
P&M-006 Concrete Paver Finisher with 40 HP Motor cum / hour 20 hour 1273.00
surface
P&M-007 Concrete Pump of 45 & 30 cum capacity Pumping of concrete cum / hour 33 / 22 hour 333.00
capacity in
P&M-008 Concrete Bucket For Pouring concrete 1 hour 21.00
cum
P&M-009 Concrete Mixer (a) 0.4/0.28 cum Concrete Mixing cum/hour 2.5 hour 66.00
P&M-010 Concrete Mixer (b) 1 cum Concrete Mixing cum/hour 7.5 hour 215.00
P&M-011 Crane (a) 80 tonnes Lifting Purpose hour 1666.00
P&M-012 Cranes b) 35 tonnes Lifting Purpose hour 1111.00
P&M-013 Cranes c) 3 tonnes Lifting Purpose hour 465.00
Spreading /Cutting / 300/

P&M-014 Dozer D - 80 - A 12 cum/hour hour 4846.00
Clearing 150/250
Spreading /Cutting / 200/

P&M-015 Dozer D - 50 - A 15 cum/hour hour 2873.00
Clearing 120/150
Applying emulsion tack
P&M-016 Emulsion Pressure Distributor sqm/hour 1750 hour 1042.00
coat
Soil loading / Aggregate
P&M-017 Front End loader 1 cum bucket capacity cum/hour 60 /25 hour 1185.00
loading
Genration of electric
P&M-018 Generator (a) 125 KVA KVA 100 hour 2293.00
Energy
Genration of electric
P&M-019 Generator( b) 63 KVA KVA 50 hour 920.00
Energy
P&M-020 GSB Plant 50 cum Producing GSB cum/hour 40 hour 1354.00
P&M-021 Hotmix Plant - 120 TPH capacity DBM/BM/SDC/ Premix cum/hour 40 hour 43907.00
P&M-022 Hotmix Plant - 100 TPH capacity DBM/BM/SDC/ Premix cum/hour 30 hour 33389.00
P&M-023 Hotmix Plant - 60 to 90 TPH capacity DBM/BM/SDC/ Premix cum/hour 25 hour 28127.00
P&M-024 Hotmix Plant - 40 to 60 TPH capacity DBM/BM/SDC/ Premix cum/hour 17 hour 19671.00
P&M-025 Hydraulic Chip Spreader Surface Dressing sqm/hour 1500 hour 3432.00
Soil Ordinary/Soil Marshy

P&M-026 Hydraulic Excavator of 1 cum bucket cum/hour 60 /60 /60 hour 1695.00
/ Soil Unsuitable
P&M-027 Integrated Stone Crusher 100THP Crushing of Spalls TPH 100 hour 11287.00
P&M-028 Integrated Stone Crusher 200 HP Crushing of Spalls TPH 200 hour 23744.00
P&M-029 Kerb Casting Machine Kerb Making Rm/hour 80 hour 404.00
capacity in
P&M-030 Mastic Cooker Mastic Wearing coat 1 hour 80.00
tonne
P&M-031 Mechanical Broom Hydraulic Surface Cleaning sqm/hour 1250 hour 477.00
Clearing /Spreading 200/200/5

P&M-032 Motor Grader 3.35 mtr blade cum/hour hour 2576.00
/GSB /WBM 0/50
88
Mixing and laying slurry

P&M-033 Mobile slurry seal equipment sqm/hour 2700 hour 1313.00
seal
Paver Finisher Hydrostatic with sensor Paving of DBM/
P&M-034 cum/hour 40 hour 3121.00
control 100 TPH BM/SDC/ Premix
Paving of WMM /Paving
P&M-035 Paver Finisher Mechanical 100 TPH cum/hour 40/30 hour 1225.00
of DLC
0.75 m dia to 1.2 m dia

P&M-036 Piling Rig with Bantonite Pump Rm/hour 2 to 3 hour 7117.00
Boring attachment
Rolling of Asphalt
P&M-037 Pneumatic Road Roller cum/hour 25 hour 1621.00
Surface
Pneumatic Sinking of
P&M-038 Pneumatic Sinking Plant cum/hour 1.5 to 2.00 hour 5432.00
wells
P&M-039 Pot Hole Repair Machine Repair of potholes cum/hour 4 hour 1180.00
Stressing of steel
P&M-040 Prestressing Jack with Pump & access hour 168.00
wires/stands
P&M-041 Ripper Scarifying cum/hour 60 hour 37.00
P&M-042 Rotavator Scarifying cum/hour 25 hour 23.00
P&M-043 Road marking machine Road marking Sqm/hour 100 hour 122.00
Soil Compaction /BM
P&M-044 Smooth Wheeled Roller 8 tonne cum/hour 70/25 hour 675.00
Compaction
P&M-045 Tandem Road Roller Rolling of Aspalt Surface cum/hour 30 hour 1491.00
Transportation of soil, Capacity in

P&M-046 Tipper - 5 cum 5.5 km 32.00
GSB, WMM, Hotmix etc. cum
P&M-047 Tipper - 5 cum 5.5 tonne.km 7.00
P&M-048 Tipper - 5 cum 5.5 hour 876.00
Transportation of
P&M-049 Transit Mixer 4.0/4.5 cum cum/hour 4.5 hour 1211.00
Concrete Mix to site
Transportation of
P&M-050 Transit Mixer 4/4.5 cum cum/hour 4.5 tonne.km 6.00
Transportation of
P&M-051 Transit Mixer 3.0 cum cum/hour 3 hour 1111.00
Transportation of
P&M-052 Transit Mixer 3.0 cum cum/hour 3 tonne.km 8.00
capacity in
P&M-053 Tractor Pulling 50 hour 473.00
HP
Rate of Tractor +
P&M-054 Tractor with Rotevator hour 494.00
Rotevator
Rate of Tractor 6+
P&M-055 Tractor with Ripper hour 509.00
Ripper
capacity/cu
P&M-056 Truck 5.5 cum per 10 tonnes Material Transport 4.5 km 29.00
m
capacity/cu
P&M-057 Truck 5.5 cum per 10 tonnes Material Transport 4.5 hour 805.00
m
capacity/cu
P&M-058 Truck 5.5 cum per 10 tonnes Material Transport 4.5 tonne.km 3.00
m
Earth or soil / GSB /
P&M-059 Vibratory Roller 8 tonne cum/hour 100/60/60 hour 1769.00
WBM
capacity in
P&M-060 Water Tanker Water Transport 6 hour 159.00
KL
capacity in
P&M-061 Water Tanker Water Transport 6 km 32.00
KL
P&M-062 Wet Mix Plant 60 TPH Wet Mix cum/hour 25 hour 1569.00
89
Sl. No. Description of Machine Unit Rate
P&M-063 Air compressor with pneumatic chisel attachment for cutting hard clay. hour 808.00
Batch type cold mixing plant 100-120 TPH capacity producing an average output of 75 tonne
P&M-064 hour 3230.00
per hour
P&M-065 Belt conveyor system hour input
P&M-066 Boat to carry atleast 20 persons hour 202.00
P&M-067 Cement concrete batch mix plant @ 175 cum per hour (effective output) hour 6782.00
P&M-068 Cement concrete batch mix plant @ 75 cum per hour hour 2906.00
P&M-069 Cold milling machine @ 20 cum per hour hour 1211.00
P&M-070 Crane 5 tonne capacity hour 1111.00
P&M-074 Crane 40 T capacity hour 1666.00
P&M-075 Crane with grab 0.75 cum capacity hour 1666.00
P&M-076 Compressor with guniting equipment along with accessories hour 202.00
P&M-077 Drum mix plant for cold mixes of appropriate capacity but not less than 75 tonnes/hour. hour 1569.00
P&M-078 Epoxy Injection gun hour 151.00
P&M-079 Generator 33 KVA hour 484.00
Induction, deinduction and erection of plant and equipment including all components and
P&M-082 hour input
accessories for pneumatic method of well sinking.
P&M-083 Joint Cutting Machine with 2-3 blades (for rigid pavement) hour 303.00
P&M-084 Jack for Lifting 40 tonne lifting capacity. day 1111.00
P&M-085 Piling rig Including double acting pile driving hammer (Hydraulic rig) hrs 7117.00
P&M-086 Plate compactor hour 404.00
P&M-087 Snow blower equipment 140 HP @ 600 cum per hour hour input
P&M-088 Texturing machine (for rigid pavement) hour 102.00
P&M-089 Truck Trailor 30 tonne capacity hour 3230.00
P&M-090 Truck Trailor 30 tonne capacity t.km 3.00
P&M-091 Tunnel Boring machine hour input
P&M-092 Vibrating Pile driving hammer complete with power unit and accessories. hour input
P&M-093 Wet Mix Plant 100 TPH hour 2355.00
P&M-094 Wet Mix Plant 75 TPH 2551.00
90
(B) Labour
Sl. No. Description of Labour Unit Rate (input)
L-01 Blacksmith (IInd class) day 249.00
L-02 Blacksmith (Ist class)/ Welder/ Plumber/ Electrician day 279.00
L-03 Blaster (Stone cutter) day 347.00
L-04 Carpenter I Class day 279.00
L-05 Chiseller (Head Mazdoor) day 264.00
L-06 Driller (Jumper) day 249.00
L-07 Diver day 299.00
L-08 Fitter day 284.00
L-09 Mali day 264.00
L-10 Mason (IInd class) day 249.00
L-11 Mason (Ist class) day 279.00
L-12 Mate / Supervisor day 222.00
L-13 Mazdoor day 206.00
L-14 Mazdoor/Dresser (Semi Skilled) day 215.00
L-15 Mazdoor/Dresser/Sinker (Skilled) day 262.00
L-16 Medical Officer day 778.00
L-17 Operator(grouting) day 232.00
L-18 Painter I class day 265.00
L-19 Para medical personnel day 383.00
91
(C) Materials
Sl. No. Description Unit Rate (input)
M-001 Stone Boulder of size 150 mm and below at Cruser Plant cum 338.58
M-002 Supply of quarried stone 150 - 200 mm size for Hand Broken at site cum 338.58
M-003 Boulder with minimum size of 300 mm for Pitching at Site cum 338.58
M-004 Coarse sand at Mixing Plant cum 141.09
M-005 Coarse sand at Site cum 275.78
M-006 Fine sand at Site cum 119.8
M-007 Moorum at Site cum 134.57
M-008 Gravel/Quarry spall at Site Cum 312.18
M-009 Granular Material or hard murrum for GSB works at Site Cum 134.96
M-010 Granular Material or hard murrum for GSB works at Mixing Plant Cum 134.96
M-011 Fly ash conforming to IS: 3812 ( Part II & I) atHMP Plant / Batching Plant / Crushing Plant Cum 0
M-012 Filter media/Filter Material as per Table 300-3 (MoRT&H Specification) Cum 422.28
92
Rate at Plant
Sl. No. Description Unit (HMP/Batchi Rate at Site
ng)
M-013 Close graded Granular sub-base Material 53 mm to 9.5 mm cum 494.46 578.9
M-014 Close graded Granular sub-base Material 37.5 mm to 9.5 mm cum 471.86 552.26
M-018 Close graded Granular sub-base Material 4.75mm to 2.36 mm cum 195.72 226.59
M-019 Close graded Granular sub-base Material 4.75mm to 75 micron mm 181.88 210.27
M-020 Close graded Granular sub-base Material 2.36 mm cum 181.88 210.27
M-021 Stone crusher dust finer than 3mm with not more than 10% passing 0.075 sieve. cum 92.57 109.16
M-022 Coarse graded Granular sub-base Material 2.36 mm & below cum 181.88 206.07
M-023 Coarse graded Granular sub-base Material 4.75mm to 75 micron mm 181.88 206.07
M-024 Coarse graded Granular sub-base Material 4.75 mm to 2.36 mm cum 195.72 222.38
M-029 Coarse graded Granular sub-base Material 53 mm to 26 .5mm cum 441.36 512.05
M-030 Aggregates below 5.6 mm cum 195.72 222.38
M-031 Aggregates 22.4 mm to 2.36 mm cum 507.98 590.63
M-033 Aggregates 45 mm to 2.8 mm cum 453.47 526.34
M-038 Aggregates 63 mm to 45 mm cum 412.26 477.75
M-044 Aggregates 13.2 mm to 10 mm cum 617.12 719.34
M-050 Aggregates 6 mm nominal size cum 394.20 456.45
M-052 Aggregates 13.2/12.5 mm nominal size cum 617.12 719.34
93
Sl. No. Description Unit Rate
M-056 AC pipe 100 mm dia metre 45.83
M-057 Acrylic polymer bonding coat litre input
M-058 Alluminium Paint litre 120.58
M-059 Aluminium alloy plate 2mm Thick sqm 9364.51
M-060 Aluminium alloy/galvanised steel tonne 37458.03
Aluminium sheeting fixed with encapsulated lens type reflective sheeting including 2% towards
M-061 sqm 8740.21
lettering, cost of angle iron, cost of drilling holes, nuts, bolts etc.and signs as applicable
M-062 Aluminium studs 100 x 100 mm fitted with lense reflectors nos 169.12
M-063 Barbed wire kg 55.83
M-064 Bearing (Cost of parts) nos input
M-065 Bearing (Cast steel rocker bearing assembly of 250 tonne ) nos 77649.64
Bearing (Elastomeric bearing assembly consisting of 7 internal layers of elastomer bonded to 6

M-066 cucm 8000.00
nos. internal reinforcing steel laminates by the process of vulcanisation,)
M-067 Bearing (Forged steel roller bearing of 250 tonne nos 46589.77
Bearing (Pot type bearing assembly consisting of a metal piston supported by a disc, PTFE
M-068 pads providing sliding surfaces against stainless steel mating together with cast steel nos input
assemblies/fabricated structural steel assemblies duly painted with all components
M-069 Bearing (PTFE sliding plate bearing assembly of 80 tonnes ) nos input
M-070 Bearing (Supply of sliding plate bearing of 80 tonne) nos 31373.59
M-071 Bentonite kg 3.25
M-072 Binding wire kg 56.79
M-073 Bitumen ( Cationic Emulsion ) (Ex. Ulberia MS) tonne 27513.61
M-074 Bitumen (60-70 grade) tonne 32748.14
M-075 Bitumen (80-100 grade ) tonne 31827.02
M-076 Bitumen (Cutback ) tonne 32748.14
M-077 Bitumen (emulsion) (Ex. Patna MS) tonne 27513.61
M-078 Bitumen (modified graded) (Ex. Patna CRMB-55) tonne 35167.49
M-079 Brick each 5.641
M-080 C.I.shoes for the pile kg 47.37
M-081 Cement tonne 5683.05
M-082 Cold twisted bars (HYSD Bars) tonne 31613.00
M-083 Coller for joints 300 mm dia nos 0.00
M-084 Compressible Fibre Board(20mm thick) sqm 935.54
M-085 Connectors/ Staples each input
M-086 Copper Plate(12m long x 250mmwide) kg 708.64
M-087 Corrosion resistant Structural steel tonne 45061.38
M-088 Corrugated sheet, 3 mm thick, "Thrie" beam section railing kg 48.65
M-089 Credit for excavated rock found suitable for use cum 145.40
94
M-090 Curing compound liter 122.99
M-091 Delineators from ISI certified firm as per the standard drawing given in IRC - 79 each 793.71
M-092 Earth Cost or compensation for earth taken from private land cum 23.65
Elastomeric slab seal expansion joint assembly manufactured by using chloroprene, elastomer
M-093 metre 26366.47
for elastomeric slab unit conforming to clause 915.1 of IRC: 83 (part II),
M-094 Electric Detonators @ 1 detonator for 1/2 gelatin stick of 125 gms each 100 nos 614.96
M-095 Epoxy compound with accessories for preparing epoxy mortar kg 538.10
M-096 Epoxy mortar kg 737.95
M-097 Epoxy primer kg 12.30
M-098 Epoxy resin-hardner mix for prime coat kg 653.40
M-099 Flag of red color cloth 600 x 600 mm each 46.12
M-100 Flowering Plants each 30.75
M-101 Galvanised MS flat clamp nos 15.46
Galvanised steel wire crates of mesh size 100 mm x 100 mm woven with 4mm dia. GI wire in
M-102 sqm 99.02
rolls of required size.
M-103 Galvanised structural steel plate 200 mm wide, 6 mm thick, 24 m long kg 45.02
M-104 Gelatin 80% kg 875.53
M-105 Geo grids sqm input
M-106 Geomembrane sqm input
M-107 Geonets sqm 105.70
M-108 Geotextile sqm 82.63
M-109 Geotextile filter fabric sqm 82.63
M-110 GI bolt 10 mm Dia nos 15.10
M-111 Grouting pump with agitator hour 153.74
M-112 Grass (Doob) kg 3.98
M-113 Grass (Fine) kg 3.98
M-114 HDPE pipes 75mm dia metre 220.44
M-115 HDPE pipes 90mm dia metre 220.44
M-116 Hedge plants each 30.75
M-117 Helical pipes 600mm diameter metre input
M-118 Hot applied thermoplastic compound litre 200.01
M-119 HTS strand tonne 69232.20
M-120 Joint Sealant Compound kg 24.60
M-121 Jute netting, open weave, 2.5 cm square opening for seeding and Mulching sqm 38.43
M-122 LDO for steam curing litre input
M-123 M.S. Clamps nos 33.35
M-124 M.S. Clamps kg 60.37
M-125 M.S.shoes @ 35 Kg per pile of 15 m kg 23.09
M-126 Mild Steel bars tonne 30635.71

95
Modular strip/box seal expansion joint including anchorage catering to a horizontal movement
beyond 70 mm and upto 140mm assembly comprising of edge beams, central beam,2
M-127 metre 29056.91
modules chloroprene seal, anchorage elements, support and control system, all steel sections
protected against corrosion and installed by the manufacturer or his authorised representative
Modular strip/box seal expansion joint catering to a horizontal movement beyond 140mm and
upto 210mm box/box seal joint assembly containing 3 modules/cells and comprising of edge
M-128 beams, two central beams, chloroprene seal, anchorage elements, support and control system, metre input
all steel sections protected against corrosion and installed by the manufacturer or his
authorised representative
M-129 Nipples 12mm nos input
M-130 Nuts and bolts kg 58.41
M-131 Paint litre 238.48
M-132 Pavement Marking Paint litre 238.48
M-133 Paving Fabric sqm input
M-134 Perforated geosynthetic pipe 150 mm dia metre 27.84
M-135 Perforated pipe of cement concrete, internal dia 100 mm metre 117.57
M-136 Pesticide kg 80.63
M-137 Pipes 200 mm dia, 2.5 m long for drainage metre 179.62
M-138 Plastic sheath, 1.25 mm thick for dowel bars sqm 15.37
M-139 Plastic tubes 50 cm dia, 1.2 m high nos input
M-140 Polymer braids metre input
M-141 Pre moulded Joint filler,25 mm thick for expansion joint. sqm 960.88
M-142 Pre-coated stone chips of 13.2 mm nominal size cum 664.66
Preformed continuous chloroprene elastomer or closed cell foam sealing element with high tear
M-143 metre input
strength, vulcanised in a single operation for the full length of a joint to ensure water tightness.
M-144 Pre-moulded asphalt filler board sqm 960.88
M-145 Pre-packed cement based polymer concrete of strength 45 Mpa at 28 days kg input
M-146 Primer kg 13.14
M-147 Quick setting compound kg input
M-148 Random Rubble Stone cum 316.93
M-149 RCC Pipe NP 4 heavy duty non presure pipe 1000 mm dia metre 2881.74
M-152 Reflectorising glass beads kg 65.00
M-153 Reinforcement strips 60 mm wide 5 mm thick as per clause 3102. (Copper Strips) metre input
Reinforcement strips 60 mm wide 5 mm thick as per clause 3102. (Galvanised carbon steel
M-154 metre input
strips)
Reinforcement strips 60 mm wide 5 mm thick as per clause 3102. (Glass reinforced
M-155 metre input
polymer/fibre reinforced polymer/polymeric strips)
M-156 Reinforcement strips 60 mm wide 5 mm thick as per clause 3102. (Stainless steel strips) metre input
M-157 Reinforcement strips 60 mm wide 5 mm thick as per clause 3102. Aluminium strips) metre input
M-158 Rivets each 7.80
96
M-159 Sand bags (Cost of sand and Empty cement bag) nos 6.90
M-160 Sapling 2 m high 25 mm dia each 23.07
M-161 Scrap tyres of size 900 x 20 nos 76.87
M-162 Seeds kg 30.75
M-163 Selected earth cum 23.65
M-164 Separation Membrane of impermeable plastic sheeting 125 micron thick sqm 15.37
M-165 Sheathing duct metre 84.56
M-166 Shrubs each 15.37
M-167 Sludge / Farm yard manure @ 0.18 cum per 100 sqm at site of work for turfing cum 691.83
M-168 Sodium vapour lamp each input
M-169 Square Rubble Coursed Stone cum 316.92

Steel circular hollow pole of standard specification for street lighting to mount light at 5 m height
M-170 each input
above deck level
Steel circular hollow pole of standard specification for street lighting to mount light at 9 m height
M-171 each input
above road level
M-172 Steel drum 300 mm dia 1.2 m high/empty bitumen drum nos 124.81
M-173 Steel helmet and cushion block on top of pile head during driving. kg 41.10
M-174 Steel pipe 25 mm external dia as per IS:1239 metre 128.49
M-175 Steel pipe 50 mm external dia as per IS:1239 metre 229.96
M-176 Steel wire rope 20 mm kg 40.39
M-177 Steel wire rope 40 mm kg 40.39
M-178 Strip seal expansion joint metre 8179.95
M-179 Structural Steel tonne 33878.57
M-180 Super plastisizer admixture IS marked as per 9103-1999 kg 153.74
M-181 Synthetic Geogrids as per clause 3102.8 and approved design and specifications. sqm input
M-182 Through and bond stone each 12.11
M-183 Tie rods 20mm diameter nos input
M-184 Tiles size 300 x 300 mm and 25 mm thick each 45.92
M-185 Timber cum 49591.50
M-186 Traffic cones with 150 mm reflective sleeve nos input
M-187 Tube anchorage set complete with bearing plate, permanent wedges etc nos 46.12
M-188 Unstaked lime tonne 3305.45
M-189 Water KL 230.60
M-190 Water based cement paint litre 121.37
M-191 Welded steel wire fabric kg 39.09
M-192 Wire mesh 50mm x 50mm size of 3mm wire kg 39.09
M-193 Wooden ballies 2" Dia for bracing each 24.60
M-194 Wooden ballies 8" Dia and 9 m long each 594.97
M-195 Wooden packing cum input
M-196 Wooden staff for fastening of flag 25 mm dia, one m long each 30.75
97
Overheads for Road Works 0.10
Contractors profit for Road Works 0.10
for input of Overheads or Contractors profit please

Overheads for Bridge Works 0.25
type in collum C as like below
Type symble of apostrope(') then input value then

Overheads for Bridge Works (Rehabilitation) 0.30 one space then symble of percentage (%) for
example '08 %
Contractors profit for Bridge Works 0.10
Lead from Mixing Plant to working site 16 km
Lead for E/W borow area to site 7 km
Lead for fly ash from source to site 1 km
98
Items No. Summary of Rates calculated and used for analysis of rates of other items Unit Rate
per cm
Item 8.3 Printing new letter and figures of any shade (ii) English Roman height per 0.40
letter
Item 8.8 Painting Two Coats on New Concrete Surfaces sqm 67.00
Item 8.9 Painting angle iron post two coats sqm 58.00
Item 12.6 (B) Cement mortor 1:2 (Excluding OH & CP) cum 4832.00
Item 12.6 (A) Cement mortor 1:3 (Excluding OH & CP) cum 3927.00
Item 12.6 (D) Cement mortor 1:6 (Excluding OH & CP) cum 2680.00
Item 12.7 (A ) Course Rubble masonary in cement mortor 1:3 (including OH & CP) cum 3341.00
Item 12.7 (Addl) B) Random Rubble masonary in cement mortor 1:6 (including OH & CP) cum 3620.00
Item 12.8 (A) PCC Grade M15 including OH & CP for Open Foundation by Mixer cum 5181.00
PCC Grade M15 for Open Foundation Per Cum Basic Cost of Labour, Material & Mechinery
Item 12.8 (A) cum 3624.00
by Mixer
Item 12.8 (B) PCC cum 3892.00
by Mixer
RCC Grade M20 for Open Foundation Per Cum Basic Cost of Labour, Material & Mechinery
Item 12.8 (C) cum 3970.00
by Mixer
Item 12.8 (C) RCC RCC Grade M20 including OH & CP for Open Foundation by Batching Plant cum 5854.00
Item 12.8 (C) cum 4094.00
by Batching Plant
Item 12.8 (D) cum 4227.00
by Mixer
Item 12.8 (D) PCC Grade M25 including OH & CP for Open Foundation by Batching Plant cum 6210.00
Item 12.8 (D) cum 4354.00
by Batching Plant
Item 12.8 (E) cum 4308.00
by Mixer
Item 12.8 (E) cum 4680.00
by Batching Plant
Item 12.8 (F) cum 4263.00
by Mixer
Item 12.8 (F) cum 4386.00
by Batching Plant
Item 12.8 (G) cum 4328.00
by Mixer
Item 12.8 (G) cum 4454.00
by Batching Plant
Item 12.8 (H) cum 4421.00
by Mixer
Item 12.8 (H) RCC Grade M35 including OH & CP for Open Foundation by Batching Plant cum 4949.00
Item 12.8 (H) RCC Grade M35 excluding OH & CP for Open Foundation by Batching Plant cum 4949.00
Item 12.8 (H) cum 4806.00
by Batching Plant
PCC Grade M20 for Open Foundation (Bottom Plug) Per Cum Basic Cost of Labour, Material
Item 12.11 (C) i cum 4427.00
& Mechinery by Mixer
Item 12.11 (C) i cum 4423.00
& Mechinery by Batching Plant
99
Item 12.11 (C) ii cum 4635.00
Item 12.11 (C) ii cum 4629.00
Item 12.11 (C) iii cum 4671.00
Item 12.11 (C) iii cum 4667.00
Item 12.11 (C) iv cum 4755.00
Item 12.11 (C) iv PCC Grade M35 including OH & CP for Well Foundation (Bottom Plug) by Batching Plant cum 6809.00
Item 12.11 (C) iv cum 4749.00
Item 12.11 (F) iv PCC Grade M35 including OH & CP for Well Foundation (Well Cap) by Batching Plant cum 6438.00
Item No. 3.13 Excavation for Structures (Manual Means) cum 208.00
Item No. 3.13 Excavation for Structures (Mechenical Meanse) cum 48.00
Item 14.1(A) RCC Grade M20 for super-structure including OH & CP by Batching Plant cum 6693.00
Item 14.1(B) RCC Grade M20 for super-structure including OH & CP by Batching Plant cum 7278.00
Item 14.1(E) RCC Grade M20 for super-structure including OH & CP by Batching Plant cum 9817.76
RCC Grade M30 for super-structure including formwork and excluding OH & CP by Batching
Item 14.1(C) cum
Plant 5348.00
RCC Grade M30 for super-structure excluding formwork and excluding OH & CP by Batching
Item 14.1(C) cum
Plant 4457.00
Supplying ,fitting and placing HYSD bar reinforcement in super-structure exncluding OH &
Item 14.2 A tonne 36608.00
CP
Item 13.6 Supplying, fitting and placing HYSD including OH & CP for sub-structure tonne 49336.00
Item 5.17 Fog Seal sqm 32.00
Crack Prevention courses. Case-I Stress Absorbing Membrane (SAM) crack width less than 6
Item 5.21 Case-I sqm 56.00
mm
Crack Prevention courses. Case-II Stress Absorbing Membrane (SAM) with crack width 6 mm
Item 5.21 Case-II sqm 68.00
to 9 mm
Crack Prevention courses. Case-III Stress Absorbing Membrane (SAM) crack width above 9
Item 5.21 Case-III sqm 88.00
mm and cracked area above 50 %
Item 5.21 Case-IV Crack Prevention courses. Case-IV Bitumen Impregnated Geotextile sqm 156.00
Item 5.15 Case-I Slurry Seal Case-I 5 mm thickness sqm 53.00
Item 5.15 Case-II Slurry Seal Case-II 3 mm thickness sqm 36.00
Item 5.15 Case-III Slurry Seal Case III 1.5 mm thickness sqm 22.00
Item 5.9 Case-I Surface Dressing Case-I 19 mm nominal chipping size sqm 77.00
Item 5.9 Case-II Surface Dressing Case-II 13 mm nominal size chipping sqm 64.00
100
Lead Chart for different Construction Material
Carriage Lead Surface
Carriage Lead Katcha

Unsurface Road Km.
Carriage Lead
Type of material
Name of Quarry
Track Km.
Road Km.
S. No.
Unit
1 2 3
1 Stone Boulders cum Mirzachowki 42 0 0
2 Stone Metal cum Mirzachowki 42 0 0
3 Stone Chips cum Mirzachowki 42 0 0
4 Sand cum Sanhaula 23 0 0
5 Local Sand cum Local 2 0 1
6 Steel (TMT Bars) MT Bhagalpur 25 0 0
7 Cement MT Bhagalpur 25 0 0
8 Bitumen (Packed) MT Barauni 153 0 0
9 Bitumen (Emulsion) MT Patna 253 0 0
10 Bitumen (CRMB) MT Patna 253 0 0
Stone Aggregate as a
11 cum Mirzachowki 42 0 0
GSB
12 Brick No Local 7 0 1
13 Hume Pipe m. Godda 95 0 0
101
Carriage Cost for different Construction Material (Without C.P & O.H) Effective from 22.09.2016
Finshed Carriage (Min. Adopted

Finshed Carriage (By Road)
Carriage Cost unsurface
for Analysis) Cost in Rs.

Loading and Unloading
Carriage Cost Surface
Carriage Cost Katcha

Unsurface Road Km.
Road Per Km. in Rs.
Road Per Km. in Rs.
Road Per Km. in Rs.

Name of Quarry
By Rail / Road
Katcha Track Km.

Surface Road Km.
Cost in Rs.
Calculation
S. No.
Carriage Lead
Carriage Lead
Carriage Lead
Unit
Type of material
Cost in Rs.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (1x5 + 2x7 + 3x9 + 10)
1 Stone Boulders Road cum Mirzachowki 42 0 0 8 / 4.8 x 6.04 = 10.07 8 / 4.8 x 7.27 = 12.12 8 / 4.8 x14.63 = 24.38 152.00 = 42 x 10.07 + 0 x 12.12 + 0 x 24.38 + 152 = 574.94 574.94
2 Stone Metal Road cum Mirzachowki 42 0 0 8 / 4.59 x 6.04 = 10.53 8 / 4.59 x 7.27 = 12.67 8/4.59 x14.63 = 25.50 124.00 = 42 x 10.53 + 0 x 12.67 + 0 x 25.5 + 124 = 566.26 566.26
3 Stone Chips Road cum Mirzachowki 42 0 0 8 / 5 x 6.04 = 9.66 8 / 5 x 7.27 = 11.63 8 / 5 x 14.63 = 23.41 124.00 = 42 x 9.66 + 0 x 11.63 + 0 x 23.41 + 124 = 529.72 529.72
Stone Aggregate
4 Road cum Mirzachowki 42 0 0 8 / 6 x 6.04 = 8.05 8 / 6 x 7.27 = 9.69 8 / 6 x 14.63 = 19.51 152.00 = 42 x 8.05 + 0 x 9.69 + 0 x 19.51 + 152 = 490.10 490.10
as a GSB
5 Sand Road cum Sanhaula 23 0 0 8 / 5 x 6.04 = 9.66 8 / 5 x 7.27 = 11.63 8 / 5 x 14.63 = 23.41 124.00 = 23 x 9.66 + 0 x 11.63 + 0 x 23.41 + 124 = 346.18 346.18
6 Local Sand Road cum Local 2 0 1 8 / 5 x 6.04 = 9.66 8 / 5 x 7.27 = 11.63 8 / 5 x 14.63 = 23.41 124.00 = 2 x 9.66 + 0 x 11.63 + 1 x 23.41 + 124 = 166.73 166.73
7 Steel (TMT Bars) Road MT Bhagalpur 25 0 0 8 / 8 x 6.04 = 6.04 8 / 8 x 7.27 = 7.27 8 / 8 x 14.63 = 14.63 203.98 = 25 x 6.04 + 0 x 7.27 + 0 x 14.63 + 203.98 = 354.98 354.98
8 Cement Road MT Bhagalpur 25 0 0 8 / 8 x 6.04 = 6.04 8 / 8 x7.27 = 7.27 8 / 8 x 14.63 = 14.63 203.98 = 25 x 6.04 + 0 x 7.27 + 0 x 14.63 + 203.98 = 354.98 354.98
9 Bitumen (Packed) Road MT Barauni 153 0 0 8 / 8 x 6.04 = 6.04 8 / 8 x 7.27 = 7.27 8 / 8 x 14.63 = 14.63 203.98 = 153 x 6.04 + 0 x 7.27 + 0 x 14.63 + 203.98 = 1128.10 1,128.10
10 Bitumen (Emulsion) Road MT Patna 253 0 0 8 / 8 x 6.04 = 6.04 8 / 8 x 7.27 = 7.27 8 / 8 x 14.63 = 14.63 203.98 = 253 x 6.04 + 0 x 7.27 + 0 x 14.63 + 203.98 = 1732.10 1,732.10
11 Brick Road No Local 7 0 1 (2x2) x 6.04 = 24.16 (2x2) x 7.27 = 29.08 (2x2) x 14.63 = 58.52 152.00 = 7 x 24.16 + 0 x 29.08 + 1 x 58.52 + 152 = 379.64 379.64
12 Hume Pipe Road m. Godda 95 0 0 8 / 10 x 6.04 = 4.83 8 / 10 x 7.27 = 5.82 8 / 10 x 14.63 = 11.70 152.00 = 95 x 4.83 + 0 x 5.82 + 0 x 11.7 + 152 = 610.85 610.85
102
Summary of Rate Analysis SOR Effective from 22.09.2016

Item No. Descriptions Unit Rate
CHAPTER-1
CARRIAGE OF MATERIALS
Loading and unloading of stone boulder / stone aggregates / sand / kanker / moorum.
(Placing tipper at loading point, loading with front end loader, dumping, turning for return trip,
1.1 cum 150.00
excluding time for haulage and return trip)
1.2 Loading and Unloading of Boulders by Manual Means cum 184.00

1.3 Loading and Unloading of Cement or Steel by Manual Means and stacking. tonne 247.00
1.4 Cost of Haulage Excluding Loading and Unloading
(i) Surfaced Road tonne.km 7.30
(ii) Unsurfaced Gravelled Road tonne.km 8.80
(iii) Katcha Track and Track in river bed / nallah bed and choe bed. tonne.km 17.70
CHAPTER-2
SITE CLEARANCE
Cutting of Trees, including Cutting of Trunks, Branches and Removal (Cutting of trees,
2.1 including cutting of trunks, branches and removal of stumps, roots, stacking of serviceable
material with all lifts and up to a lead of 1000 mtrs and earth filling in the depression/pit.)
(i) Girth from 300 mm to 600 mm each 212.00

(ii) Girth from 600 mm to 900 mm each 407.00
(iii) Girth from 900 mm to 1800 mm each 749.00
(iv) Girth above 1800 mm each 1,383.00
Clearing and Grubbing Road Land .(Clearing and grubbing road land including uprooting
rank vegetation, grass, bushes, shrubs, saplings and trees girth up to 300 mm, removal of
2.3 stumps of trees cut earlier and disposal of unserviceable materials and stacking of
serviceable material to be used or auctioned up to a lead of 1000 metres including removal
and disposal of top organic soil not exceeding 150 mm in thickness.)
(i) By Manual Means:-

A In area of light jungle hectare 39,573.00
B In area of thorny jungle hectare 53,146.00
(ii) By Mechanical Means
A In area of light jungle hectare 60,249.00

B In area of thorny jungle hectare 72,782.00
Dismantling of Structures (Dismantling of existing structures like culverts, bridges, retaining

walls and other structure comprising of masonry, cement concrete, wood work, steel work,
2.4 including T&P and scaffolding wherever necessary, sorting the dismantled material, disposal
of unserviceable material and stacking the serviceable material with all lifts and lead of 1000
metres)
(i) Lime /Cement Concrete

I By Manual Means
A Lime Concrete, cement concrete grade M-10 and below cum 332.00
B Cement Concrete Grade M-15 & M-20 cum 384.00
C Prestressed / Reinforced cement concrete grade M-20 & above cum 921.00
II By Mechanical Means for items No. 202( b) & ( c)
A Cement Concrete Grade M-15 & M-20 cum 500.00
B Prestressed / Reinforced cement concrete grade M-20 & above cum 793.00
(ii) Dismantling Brick / Tile work
A In lime mortar cum 228.00
B In cement mortar cum 280.00
C In mud mortar cum 207.00
D Dry brick pitching or brick soling cum 196.00
(iii) Dismantling Stone Masonry
A Rubble stone masonry in lime mortar cum 248.00
B Rubble stone masonry in cement mortar. cum 280.00
C Rubble Stone Masonry in mud mortar. cum 228.00
D Dry rubble masonry cum 217.00
E Dismantling stone pitching/ dry stone spalls. cum 207.00
103

Dismantling boulders laid in wire crates including opening of crates and stacking dismantled
F cum 228.00
materials.
Wood work wrought framed and fixed in frames of trusses upto a height of 5 m above plinth
(iv) cum 471.00
level
Steel work in all types of sections upto a height of 5 m above plinth level excluding cutting of
(v)
rivet.
A Including dismembering tonne 1,121.00
B Excluding dismembering. tonne 842.00
C Extra over item No( V ) A and( V ) B for cutting rivets. tonne 8.00
(vi) Scraping of bricks dismantled from brick work including stacking.
In lime/Cement mortar 1000
A 910.00
numbers
(vii) Scraping of Stone from dismantled stone masonry
A In cement and lime mortar cum 365.00
B In Mud mortar cum 77.00
(viii) Scarping plaster in lime or cement mortar from brick/ stone masonry sqm 12.20
Removing all type of hume pipes and stacking within a lead of 1000 metres including
(ix) earthwork and dismantling of masonry works.
A Up to 600 mm dia metre 135.00
B Above 600 mm to 900 mm dia metre 183.00
C Above 900 mm metre 313.00
Dismantling of Flexible Pavements (Dismantling of flexible pavements and disposal of
2.5 dismantled materials up to a lead of 1000 metres, stacking serviceable and unserviceable
materials separately)
I By Manual Means
A Bituminous courses cum 607.00
B Granular courses cum 449.00
II By Mechanical Means
A Bituminous course cum 305.00
Dismantling Kilometre Stone (Dismantling of kilometre stone including cutting of earth,
2.10 foundation and disposal of dismantled material with all lifts and lead upto 1000 m and back
filling of pit.)
A 5th KM stone each 308.00
B Ordinary KM Stone each 187.00
C Hectometre Stone each 37.40
CHAPTER-3
EARTH WORK, EROSION CONTROL AND DRAINAGE
Excavation in Soil using Hydraulic Excavator CK 90 and Tippers with disposal upto 1000
metres. (Excavation for roadwork in soil with hydraulic excavator of0.9 cum bucket capacity
3.6 including cutting and loading in tippers, trimming bottom and side slopes, in accordance cum 97.74
with requirements of lines, grades and cross sections, and transporting to the embankment
location within all lifts and lead upto 1000m)
A Mechanised cum 517.00

B Manual Method cum 881.00
Excavation in Marshy Soil (Excavation for roadway in marshy soil with hydraulic excavator 0.9
cum bucket capacity including cutting and loading in tippers and disposal with in all lifts and
3.10 cum 105.95
lead upto 1000 metres, trimming of bottom and side slopes in accordance with requirements
of lines, grades and cross sections.)
Removal of Unserviceable Soil with Disposal upto 1000 metres (Removal of unserviceable
3.11 soil including excavation, loading and disposal upto 1000 metres lead but excluding cum 84.00
replacement by suitable soil which shall be paid separately as per clause 305.)
Scarifying Existing Granular Surface to a Depth of 50 mm by Manual Means (Scarifying the

3.14 existing granular road surface to a depth of 50 mm and disposal of scarified material within sqm 23.00
all lifts and leads upto 1000 metres. )
Scarifying existing bituminous surface to a depth of 50 mm by mechanical means (Scarifying
3.15 the existing bituminous road surface to a depth of 50 mm and disposal of scarified material sqm 6.40
with in all lifts and lead upto 1000 metres.)
104

Embankment Construction with Material Obtained from Borrow Pits (Construction of
embankment with approved material obtained from borrow pits with all lifts and leads,
3.16 cum 267.00
transporting to site, spreading, grading to required slope and compacting to meet
requirement of table 300-2)
Construction of Embankment with Material Deposited from Roadway Cutting (Construction
of embankment with approved materials deposited at site from roadway cutting and
3.17 cum 172.85
excavation from drain and foundation of other structures graded and compacted to meet
requirement of table 300-2)
Construction of Subgrade and Earthen Shoulders (Construction of subgrade and earthen
shoulders with approved material obtained from borrow pits with all lifts & leads, transporting
3.18 cum 307.00
to site, spreading, grading to required slope and compacted to meet requirement of table
No. 300-2)
3.19 Compacting Original Ground
Compacting original ground supporting subgrade (Loosening of the ground upto a level
Case-I of500 mm below the subgrade level, watered, graded and compacted in layers to meet cum 81.00
requirement of table 300-2 for subgrade construction.)
Case-II :Compacting original ground supporting embankment cum 46.00
Stripping and Storing Top Soil (Stripping, storing of top soil by road side at 15 m internal and
3.20 re-application on embankment slopes, cut slopes and other areas in localities where the cum 189.00
available embankment material is not conducive to plant growth)
CHAPTER-4
SUB-BASES, BASES ( NON- BITUMINOUS) AND SHOULDERS
4.1 Granular Sub-base with Close Graded Material (Table:- 400-1)

Plant Mix Method (Construction of granular sub-base by providing close graded Material,
mixing in a mechanical mix plant at OMC, carriage of mixed Material to work site, spreading
A
in uniform layers with motor grader on prepared surface and compacting with vibratory
power roller to achieve the desired density, complete as per clause 401 )
(i) for grading- I Material cum 2,068.00
(ii) for grading- II Material cum 2,028.00
(iii) for grading-III Material cum 1,864.00
By Mix in Place Method (Construction of granular sub-base by providing close graded
material, spreading in uniform layers with motor grader on prepared surface, mixing by mix in
B
place method with rotavator at OMC, and compacting with vibratory roller to achieve the
desired density, complete as per clause 401)
(i) for grading- I Material cum 1,721.00
(ii) for grading- II Material cum 1,608.00
(iii) for grading-III Material cum 1,517.00
Wet Mix Macadam (Providing, laying, spreading and compacting graded stone aggregate to
wet mix macadam specification including premixing the Material with water at OMC in
mechanical mix plant carriage of mixed Material by tipper to site, laying in uniform layers with
4.12 cum 2,096.00
paver in sub- base / base course on well prepared surface and compacting with vibratory
roller to achieve the desired density.)
CHAPTER-5
BASES AND SURFACE COURSES (BITUMINOUS)
Prime coat (Providing and applying primer coat with bitumen emulsion on prepared surface
5.1 of granular Base including clearing of road surface and spraying primer at the rate of 0.75 sqm 29.10
kg/sqm using mechanical means.)
5.2 Tack coat
Providing and applying tack coat with bitumen emulsion using emulsion pressure distributor
at the rate of 0.275 kg per sqm on the prepared bituminous/granular surface cleaned with sqm 11.50
mechanical broom.
Bituminous Macadam (Providing and laying bituminous macadam with 100-120 TPH hot mix
plant producing an average output of 75 tonnes per hour using crushed aggregates of
5.3 specified grading premixed with bituminous binder, transported to site, laid over a previously
prepared surface with paver finisher to the required grade, level and alignment and rolled as
per clauses 501.6 and 501.7 to achieve the desired compaction)
(i) for Grading I ( 40 mm nominal size ) cum 6,784.00
105

(ii) for GradingII(19 mm nominal size) cum 6,758.00
Dense Graded Bituminous Macadam (Providing and laying dense bituminous macadam
with 100-120 TPH batch type HMP producing an average output of 75 tonnes per hour using
crushed aggregates of specified grading, premixed with bituminous binder @ 4.0 to 4.5% by
5.6 weight of total mix of mix and filler, transporting the hot mix to work site, laying with a
hydrostatic paver finisher with sensor control to the required grade, level and alignment,
rolling with smooth wheeled, vibratory and tandem rollers to achieve the desired compaction
as per MoRTH specification clause No. 507 complete in all respects.)

Semi - Dense Bituminous Concrete (Providing and laying semi dense bituminous concrete
with 100-120 TPH batch type HMP producing an average output of 75 tonnes per hour using
crushed aggregates of specified grading, premixed with bituminous binder @ 4.5 to 5 % of
5.7 mix and filler, transporting the hot mix to work site, laying with a hydrostatic paver finisher
with sensor control to the required grade, level and alignment, rolling with smooth wheeled,
vibratory and tandem rollers to achieve the desired compaction as per MoRTH specification
clause No. 508 complete in all respects)

Bituminous Concrete (Providing and laying bituminous concrete with 100-120 TPH batch
type hot mix plant producing an average output of 75 tonnes per hour using crushed
aggregates of specified grading, premixed with bituminous binder @ 5.4 to 5.6 % of mix and
filler, transporting the hot mix to work site, laying with a hydrostatic paver finisher with sensor
5.8
control to the required grade, level and alignment, rolling with smooth wheeled, vibratory and
tandem rollers to achieve the desired compaction as per MORTH specification clause No.
509 complete in all respects)
(i) for Grading-I ( 13 mm nominal size ) cum 9,004.00

(ii) for Grading-II(10 mm nominal size) cum 8,973.00
CHAPTER-6
CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENTS
Dry Lean Cement Concrete Sub- base (Construction of dry lean cement concrete Sub- base
over a prepared sub-grade with coarse and fine aggregate conforming to IS: 383, the size of
coarse aggregate not exceeding 25 mm, aggregate cement ratio not to exceed 15:1,
aggregate gradation after blending to be as per table 600-1, cement content not to be less
6.1 than 150 kg/ cum, optimum moisture content to be determined during trial length cum 3,022.00
construction, concrete strength not to be less than 10 Mpa at 7 days, mixed in a batching
plant, transported to site, laid with a paver with electronic sensor, compacting with 8-10
tonnes vibratory roller, finishing and curing.)
Cement Concrete Pavement (Construction of un-reinforced, dowel jointed, plain cement

concrete pavement over a prepared sub base with 43 grade cement @ 400 kg per cum,
coarse and fine aggregate conforming to IS 383, maximum size of coarse aggregate not
exceeding 25 mm, mixed in a batching and mixing plant as per approved mix design,
transported to site, laid with a fixed form or slip form paver, spread, compacted and finished
6.2 cum 5,983.00
in a continuous operation including provision of contraction, expansion, construction and
longitudinal joints, joint filler, separation membrane, sealant primer, joint sealant, debonding
strip, dowel bar, tie rod, admixtures as approved, curing compound, finishing to lines and
grades as per drawing )
CHAPTER-8
TRAFFIC SIGNS, MARKINGS & OTHER ROAD APPURTENANCES
Retro- reflectorised Traffic signs (Providing and fixing of retro- reflectorised cautionary,
mandatory and informatory sign as per IRC :67 made of encapsulated lens type reflective
sheeting vide clause 801.3, fixed over aluminium sheeting, 1.5 mm thick supported on a mild
8.4 steel angle iron post 75 mm x 75 mm x 6 mm firmly fixed to the ground by means of properly
designed foundation with M15 grade cement concrete 45 cm x 45 cm x 60 cm, 60 cm below
ground level as per approved drawing)
( i ) 90 cm equilateral triangle each 5,258.00

( ii ) 60 cm equilateral triangle each 3,207.00
( iii ) 60 cm circular each 4,550.00
106

( iv ) 80 mm x 60 mm rectangular each 6,633.00
( v ) 60 cm x 45 cm rectangular each 4,412.00
(vi ) 60 cm x 60 cm square each 5,364.00
( vii ) 90 cm high octagon each 8,664.00
Direction and Place Identification signs upto 0.9 sqm size board. (Providing and erecting
direction and place identification retro-reflectorised sign asper IRC:67 made of encapsulated
lens type reflective sheeting vide clause 801.3, fixed over aluminium sheeting, 2 mm thick
8.5 with area not exceeding 0.9 sqm supported on a mild steel single angle iron post 75 x 75 x 6 sqm 12,509.00
mm firmly fixed to the ground by means of properly designed foundation with M15 grade
cement concrete 45 x 45 x 60 cm, 60 cm below ground level as per approved drawing)
Direction and Place Identification signs with size more than 0.9 sqm size board. (Providing
and erecting direction and place identification retro- reflectorised sign asper IRC :67 made of
encapsulated lens type reflective sheeting vide clause 801.3, fixed over aluminium sheeting,
8.6 2 mm thick with area exceeding 0.9 sqm supported on a mild steel angle iron post 75 mm x sqm 12,828.00
75 mm x 6 mm, 2 Nos. firmly fixed to the ground by means of properly designed foundation
with M 15 grade cement concrete45 cm x 45 cm x 60 cm, 60 cm below ground level as per
approved drawing)
Painting Lines, Dashes, Arrows etc on Roads in Two Coats on New Work (Painting lines,
dashes, arrows etc on roads in two coats on new work with ready mixed road marking paint
8.11 conforming to IS:164 on bituminous surface, including cleaning the surface of all dirt, dust
and other foreign matter, demarcation at site and traffic control )
(i) Over 10 cm in width sqm 101.00

(ii) Up to 10 cm in width sqm 89.00
Road Marking with Hot Applied Thermoplastic Compound with Reflectorising Glass Beads
on Bituminous Surface (Providing and laying of hot applied thermoplastic compound 2.5 mm
8.13 thick including reflectorising glass beads @ 250 gms per sqm area, thickness of 2.5 mm is sqm 791.00
exclusive of surface applied glass beads as per IRC:35 .The finished surface to be level,
uniform and free from streaks and holes.)
Kilo Metre Stone (Reinforced cement concrete M15grade kilometre stone of standard design
8.14 as per IRC:8-1980, fixing in position including painting and printing etc)
(i) 5th kilometre stone (precast) each 3,366.00

(ii) Ordinary Kilometer stone (Precast) each 2,032.00
(iii) Hectometer stone (Precast) each 547.00
Road Delineators (Supplying and installation of delineators (road way indicators, hazard
markers, object markers), 80-100 cm high above ground level, painted black and white in 15
8.15 cm wide stripes, fitted with 80 x 100 mm rectangular or 75 mm dia circular reflectorised each 1,065.00
panels at the top, buried or pressed into the ground and confirming toIRC-79 and the
drawings.)
Boundary pillar (Reinforced cement concrete M15 grade boundary pillars of standard design
8.16 as per IRC:25-1967, fixed in position including finishing and lettering but excluding painting) each 442.00
8.23 Metal Beam Crash Barrier

Type - A, "W" : Metal Beam Crash Barrier (Providing and erecting a "W" metal beam crash
barrier comprising of 3 mm thick corrugated sheet metal beam rail, 70 cm above
road/ground level, fixed on ISMC series channel vertical post, 150 x 75 x 5 mm spaced 2 m
centre to centre, 1.8 m high, 1.1 m below ground/road level, all steel parts and fitments to be
A metre 2,164.00
galvanised by hot dip process, all fittings to conform to IS:1367 and IS:1364, metal beam rail
to be fixed on the vertical post with a spacer of channel section 150 x 75 x 5 mm, 330 mm
long complete as per clause 810)
CHAPTER-9
PIPE CULVERTS
PCC 1:3:6 in Foundation (Plain cement concrete 1:3:6 mix with crushed stone aggregate 40
9.1 mm nominal size mechanically mixed, placed in foundation and compacted by vibration cum 4,015.00
including curing for 14 days.)
107

Laying Reinforced Cement Concrete Pipe NP4/prestrssed concrete pipe on first class
bedding in single row . (Laying Reinforced cement concrete pipe NP4/prestrssed concrete
9.2 pipe for culverts on first class bedding of granular material in single row including fixing collar
with cement mortar 1:2 but excluding excavation, protection works, backfilling, concrete
and masonry works in head walls and parapets . )
A 1000 mm dia metre 4,629.00

B 1200 mm dia metre 6,198.00
Laying Reinforced Cement Concrete Pipe NP 4 /prestrssed concrete pipe on first class
bedding in double row . (Laying Reinforced cement concrete pipe NP4 /prestrssed concrete
9.3 pipe for culverts on first class bedding of granular material in double row including fixing
collar with cement mortar 1:2 but excluding excavation, protection works, backfilling,
concrete and masonry works in head walls and parapets . )
A 1000 mm dia metre 9,470.00
B 1200 mm dia metre 12,623.00
CHAPTER-12
FOUNDATIONS
Excavation for Structures (Earth work in excavation of foundation of structures as per

drawing and technical specification, including setting out, construction of shoring and
12.1
bracing, removal of stumps and other deleterious matter, dressing of sides and bottom and
backfilling with approved material.)
I Ordinary soil
A Manual Means
(i) upto 3 m depth cum 103.00
(ii) 3 m to 6 m depth cum 133.00
(iii) Above 6 m depth cum 177.00

B Mechanical Means
(i) Depth upto 3 m cum 68.00
(ii) Depth 3 m to 6 m cum 78.00
(iii) Depth above 6m cum 94.00
II Ordinary rock (not requiring blasting)
A Manual Means
(i) Depth upto 3 m cum 148.00
PCC 1:3:6 in Foundation (Plain cement concrete 1:3:6 nominal mix in foundation with
12.4 crushed stone aggregate 40 mm nominal size mechanically mixed, placed in foundation cum 4,594.00
and compacted by vibration including curing for 14 days.)
Brick masonry work in cement mortar 1:3 in foundation complete excluding pointing and
12.5 cum 5,964.00
plastering, as per drawing and technical specifications
12.6 A Cement mortar1:3 (1cement :3 sand) cum 3,927.00
B Cement mortar1:2 (1cement :2 sand) cum 4,830.00
C Cement mortar1:4 (1cement :4 sand) cum 3,325.00
D Cement mortar1:6 (1cement :6 sand) cum 2,765.00
Stone masonry work in cement mortar 1:3 in foundation complete as drawing and Technical
12.7
Specification
(a) Square Rubble Coursed rubble masonry( first sort ) cum 4,211.00
(b) Random Rubble Masonry cum 4,147.00
Plain/Reinforced cement concrete in open foundation complete as per drawing and technical
12.8
specifications
A PCC Grade M15 cum 5,181.00
B PCC Grade M20 cum 5,565.00
C RCC Grade M20
Case I Using concrete mixer cum 5,676.00
Case II With Batching Plant, Transit Mixer and Concrete Pump cum 5,854.00
D PCC Grade M25
Case I Using concrete Mixer cum 6,029.00
108

E RCC Grade M25

F PCC Grade M30
Case I Using Concrete Mixer cum 6,066.00
Case II Using Batching Plant, Transit Mixer and Concrete Pump cum 6,241.00
G RCC Grade M30
H RCC Grade M35
Bored cast-in-situ M35 grade R.C.C. pile excluding reinforcement complete as per drawing
12.25 and technical specifications and removal of excavated earth with all lifts and lead upto 1000 metre 14,750.00
m. (Pile diameter-1200 mm)
Cement concrete for reinforced concrete in pile cap complete as per drawing and Technical
12.38
Specification
A RCC Grade M20
(i) Using Concrete Mixer cum 5,640.00
(ii) Using Batching Plant, Transit Mixer and Concrete Pump cum 5,843.00
B RCC Grade M25
(i) Using concrete mixer. cum 6,141.00
C RCC Grade M30
D RCC Grade M35
12.39 Levelling course for Pile cap cum 4,738.00
Supplying, fitting and placing un-coated HYSD bar reinforcement in foundation complete as
12.40 tonne 49,214.00
per drawing and technical specifications
CHAPTER-13
SUB-STRUCTURE
Plain/Reinforced cement concrete in sub-structure complete as per drawing and technical

13.5
specifications
A PCC Grade M15
(p) Height upto 5m cum 5,481.00
B PCC Grade M20
C PCC Grade M25
(p) Height upto 5m
D PCC Grade M30
(p) Height upto 5m
E RCC Grade M20
(p) Height upto 5m
(q) Height 5m to 10m
109

F RCC Grade M25
(p) Height upto 5m
G RCC Grade M30
(p) Height upto 5m
H RCC Grade M35
(p) Height upto 5m
Supplying, fitting and placing HYSD bar reinforcement in sub-structure complete as per
13.6 tonne 49,337.00
drawing and technical specifications
Providing weep holes in Brick masonry/Plain/Reinforced concrete abutment, wing wall/return

13.8 wall with 100 mm dia AC pipe, extending through the full width of the structure with slope of each 132.00
1V :20H towards drawing foce. Complete as per drawing and Technical specifications
Back filling behind abutment, wing wall and return wall complete as per drawing and
13.9
Technical specification
A Granular material cum 1,378.00

B Sandy material cum 820.00
Providing and laying of Filter media with granular materials/stone crushed aggregates
satisfying the requirements laid down in clause 2504.2.2. of MoRTH specifications to a
thickness of not less than 600 mm with smaller size towards the soil and bigger size towards
13.10 cum 1,876.00
the wall and provided over the entire surface behind abutment, wing wall and return wall to
the full height compacted to a firm condition complete as per drawing and technical
specification.
Supplying, fitting and fixing in position true to line and level elastomeric bearing conforming
cubic
13.14 to IRC: 83 (Part-II) section IX and clause 2005 of MoRTH specifications complete including 0.61
centimetre
all accessories as per drawing and Technical Specifications.
CHAPTER-14
SUPER-STRUCTURE
Furnishing and Placing Reinforced/Prestressed cement concrete in super-structure as per

14.1
drawing and Technical Specification
C RCC Grade M 30
Case II Using Batching Plant, Transit Mixer and Concrete Pump.

(i) For solid slab super-structure, 20-30% of (a+b+c)
(q) Height 5m to 10m cum 7,660.00
(r) Height above 10m cum 7,966.00
(ii) For T-beam & slab, 25-35% of (a+b+c)
(q) Height 5m to 10m cum 7,966.00
(r) Height above 10m cum 8,273.00
110

a) Supplying, fitting and placing HYSD bar reinforcement in super-structure complete as
14.2 tonne 50,334.00
per drawing and technical specifications
14.4 Providing and laying Cement concrete wearing coat M-30 grade including reinforcement cum 9,983.00
complete as per drawing and Technical Specifications
Construction of RCC railing of M30 Grade in-situ with 20 mm nominal size aggregate, true to
line and grade, tolurence of vertical RCC post not to exceed 1 in 500, centre to centre
14.7 spacing between vertical post not to exceed 2000 mm, leaving adequate space between metre 1,492.00
vertical post for expansion, complete as per approved drawings and technical
specifications.
14.9 Drainage Spouts complete as per drawing and Technical specification each 922.00
PCC M15 Grade leveling course below approach slab complete as per drawing and
14.10 cum 5,181.00
Technical specification
Reinforced cement concrete approach slab including reinforcement and formwork complete
14.11 cum 8,764.00
as per drawing and Technical specification
Providing anti-corrosive treatment to HYSD reinforcement with Fusion Bonded Epoxy
14.12 Coating (FBEC) (To be taken as per the prevailing market rates.) tonne
Precast - pretensioned Girders (Providing, precasting, transportation and placing in

14.13 position precast pretensioned concrete girders as per drawing and technical specifications) cum #VALUE!
14.14 Providing and fixing Helical pipes in voided concrete slabs metre #VALUE!
Crash Barriers (The rate analysis for rigid crash barrier in reinforced cement concrete, semi-
rigid crash barrier with metal beam and flexible crash barrier with wire ropes have been
14.15
made and included in chapter-8 on Traffic and Transportation.)
Painting on concrete surface (Providing and applying 2 coats of water based cement paint to
14.16 unplastered concrete surface after cleaning the surface of dirt, dust, oil, grease, metre 102.00
efflorescence and applying paint @ of 1 litre for 2 Sq.m. )
Burried Joint (Providing and laying a burried expansion joint, expansion gap being 20 mm,
covered with 12 mm thick, 200 mm wide galvanised wieldable structural steel plate as per
14.17 IS: 2062, placed symmetrical to centre line of the joint, resting freely over the top surface of metre 1,046.00
the deck concrete, welding of 8 mm dia. 100 mm long galvanised nails spaced 300 mm c/c
along the centre line of the plate, all as specified in clause 2604.)
14.18 Filler joint

Providing & fixing 2 mm thick corrugated copper plate in expansion joint complete as per
(i) metre 4,496.00
drawing & Technical Specification.
Providing & fixing 20 mm thick compressible fibre board in expansion joint complete as per
(ii) metre 327.00
drawing & Technical Specification.
Providing and fixing in position 20 mm thick premoulded joint filler in expansion joint for fixed
(iii) ends of simply supported spans not exceeding 10 m to cater for a horizontal movement upto metre 404.00
20 mm, covered with sealant complete as per drawing and technical specifications.
Providing and filling joint sealing compound as per drawings and technical specifications
(iv) metre 20.00
with coarse sand and 6% bitumen by weight
Asphaltic Plug joint (Providing and laying of asphaltic plug joint to provide for horizontal
movement of 25 mm and vertical movement of 2 mm, depth of joint varying from 75 mm to
100 mm, width varying from 500 mm to 750 mm (in traffic direction), covered with a closure
14.19 plate of 200mm x 6mm of wieldable structural steel conforming to IS: 2062, asphaltic plug to metre 1,099.00
consist of polymer modified bitumen binder, carefully selected single size aggregate of 12.5
mm nominal size and a heat resistant foam caulking/backer rod, all as per approved
drawings and specifications.)
Elastomeric Slab Steel Expansion Joint (Providing and laying of an elastomeric slab steel
expansion joint, catering to right or skew (less than 20 deg., moderately curved with
maximum horizontal movement upto 50 mm, complete as per approved drawings and
14.20 metre 38,107.00
standard specifications to be installed by the manufacturer/supplier or their authorised
representative ensuring compliance to the manufacturer's instructions for installation and
clause 2606 of MoRTH specifications for road & bridge works.)
111

Compression Seal Joint (Providing and laying of compression seal joint consisting of steel
armoured nosing at two edges of the joint gap suitably anchored to the deck concrete and a
14.21 preformed chloroprene elastomer or closed cell foam joint sealer compressed and fixed into metre #VALUE!
the joint gap with special adhesive binder to cater for a horizontal movement upto 40 mm
and vertical movement of 3 mm.)
Strip Seal Expansion Joint (Providing and laying of a strip seal expansion joint catering to
maximum horizontal movement upto 70 mm, complete as per approved drawings and
14.22 metre 11,844.00
standard specifications to be installed by the manufacturer/supplier or their authorised
representative ensuring compliance to the manufacturer's instructions for installation.)
CHAPTER-15
RIVER TRAINING AND PROTECTION WORKS
Boulder apron laid in wire crates (Providing and laying of boulder apron laid in wire crates
made with 4mm dia GI wire conforming to IS: 280 & IS:4826 in 100mm x 100mm mesh
15.2 cum 2,277.00
(weaved diagonally) including 10% extra for laps and joints laid with stone boulders weighing
not less than 40 kg each.)
Providing and laying Pitching on slopes laid over prepared filter media including boulder
15.4 apron laid dry in front of toe of embankment complete as per drawing and Technical
specifications
A Stone/Boulder cum 1,847.00
B Cement Concrete blocks of size 0.3x0.3 x0.3 m cast in cement concrete of Grade M15 cum 5,285.00
Providing and laying Filter material underneath pitching in slopes complete as per drawing
15.5 cum 1,959.00
and Technical specification
112
6. Design of Proposed Bridge

including Hydraulic Particular
and Sub-Soil Investigation
Report
113
6. Design of Proposed Bridge in replacement of damaged minor Arch

Bridge in Km. 143 Bridge including Hydraulic Particular and Sub-
Soil Investigation Report
6.1 Introduction
The existing narrow arch Bridge (7 x 4.60 = 33 m.) at Ch. 142.700 of NH-80 is found
in damaged condition. Replacement of the existing Arch Bridge by New RCC High-
level Bridge is essential. Considering the available ROW in the project section, it has
been proposed to construct the New RCC High-level Bridge on existing Alignment
after it’s dismantling. Suitable Diversion Shall be constructed on right side of existing
bridge for smooth movement of Traffic during construction of New Bridge.
6.2 Checklist of Information
Sl. Technical Parameter Description

No.
1. Name of the Place & District Masarh near Sabour under Baghalpur
District.
2. Name of the Road National Highway No.-80
3. Name of the Stream No Stream, Balancing Channel
4. Km.. / Road Chainage Km. 142.700 of NH-80.
5. What arrangement exist for crossing the 7 x 4.60 m. span Masonary Arch Narrow
Stream at present Bridge
6. Whether the existing Bridge is Straight Existing Bridge is Straight
or Skew
7. Liability of site to seismic disturbance Yes
8. Nature of Catchment Alluvial bed. Main discharge takes place
during rainy season.
9. Any artificial or natural stoppage No
present in the Catchment
10. Nature of Stream Alluvial Balancing Stream
11. Type of Stream No Stream, Balancing Channel and main
discharge takes place during rainy season.
12. Design Data
(A) L.W.L. 96.400 (Report collected from Local
Villagers)
(B) Lowest Bed Level 96.366
(C) Bed slope at L.W.L. 0.0003946
13. H.F.L.
(A) At Bridge site 99.038
(B) At 135 m. U/S 99.091
(C) At 50 m. D/S 99.018
(D) Avg. Surface velocity at H.F.L. 0.847 m./sec.
(As per calculation)
14. Discharge
(A) At Bridge Site 103.765 cumecs.
(B) At 200 m. U/S 105.855 cumecs.
114
Sl. Technical Parameter Description

No.
(C) At 225 m. D/S 65.433 cumecs.
15. Design Discharge 106.00 cumecs.
16. R.L. of maxm. Scour Anticipated
1. At Pier Location 94.763
2. At Abutment Location 96.306
17. Location Plan of Boring taken in the Attached in Drawing No.-1 enclosed.
bed of the river of the location
18. Test results of sample of bores giving the following characteristics at founding level
(A) Lacy’s Silt Factor 2.74
(B) Cohesion 5.50 T / sqm. (Avg. at Founding Level)
(C) Angle of internal friction 12o (Avg. at Founding Level)
19. Location of Proposed Bridge Proposed bridge shall be Constructed on
Existing Bridge Location after dismantling
of Existing Bridge. A diversion of length
300 m. shall be constructed adjacent to
existing Bridge for smooth movement of
Traffic during construction of proposed
Bridge.
20. Does the stream carry drifting materials Yes.
during flood
21. Details of Training work Training work not required.
22. Whether Bridge proposed is straight or Proposed Bridge shall be constructed
skew Straight
23. Will the Approaches be straight Immediate 30 m. length Straight (Ref. Plan
Profile Drawing –No.-1)
24. Proposed clear Roadway Over Bridge 11.00 m. (Designed) Superstructure Dwg.
with 1.50 m. wide Footpath as per latest
Guidelines of IRC SP-73-2015.
25. Width of footpath if any 1.50 m.
26. Overall Formation Width of Bridge 16.00 m.
25. No. & Size of Span recommended 3 x 14.00 m. (Effective)
26. Type of Foundation recommended Pile Foundation
27. Details of existing bridge Attached in Report on next pages.
28. Name of the Town nearest to bridge site Bhagalpur
29. Labour & Materials detail Given in Report
6.2 Design of Proposed Bridge
Guidelines of IRC SP-73-2015. Based on Hydraulic Particular, the proposed Span
Bridge resting on Pile Foundation of 1.2 m. dia.
115
The bridge has been designed for three lane as the carriageway width is 11.00m
which is more than 9.6m as per table no.-2 of IRC-6
Loads and load combination
Design Loading
Design loading is in according to the IRC-6 having most critical combination of
various load, forces and stresses. Dead load in the various member of the bridge shall
be as per the IRC codes.
• One Lane of 70R with one lane of Class-A Load
• Three Lane of Class-A
• Footpath Live Load shall be as per IRC-6
Apart from the dead load & Live Load Wind Load and Earthquake Forces has also be
taken into account. Impact, tractive and breaking forces has also considered as per the
provision of IRC-6.
Code \ Specification
Standard Specification and code of practice for road bridges of IRC wherever
applicable are followed. Following codes have been generally followed:
IRC-5 : General Features of Design

IRC-6 : Load and Stresses
IRC-78 : Foundation and Sub-Structures
IRC-112 : Reinforced Cement Concrete Bridge
IRC-83 (Part-II) : Elastomeric Bearing
IRC : Standard Specification for Road and Bridge Works
IS-1893 : Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures
IS-2911 (Part-1/Sec-2) : Design & Construction of Pile Foundation
Grade of Concrete Proposed:
Super-structures ………………….: RCC M-30
Sub-structures
Abutment & Pier : RCC M-30
Foundations
Pile & Pile Cap : RCC M-35
The Detailed Design of Proposed Bridge is presented on next pages
116
6.4 Hydrological Calculation (Hydraulic Particular)
The Hydrological study for existing river has been carried out in the month of July
2016. Accordingly all the hydraulic calculation done based on the data collected in
field for determining the Discharge, Waterway, Scour depth, Afflux etc. Summary of
Hydraulic particulars is presented below.
1 Type of Stream No Stream, Balancing Channel and

main discharge takes place during rainy
season.
2 Design Data
(A) L.W.L. 96.400 (Report collected from Local

Villagers)
(B) Lowest Bed Level 96.366
(C) Bed slope at L.W.L. 0.0003946
3 H.F.L.
(A) At Bridge site 99.038
(B) At 135 m. U/S 99.091
(C) At 50 m. D/S 99.018
(D) Avg. Surface velocity at H.F.L. 0.847 m./sec.

(As per calculation)
4 Discharge
(A) At Bridge Site 103.765 cumecs.
(B) At 200 m. U/S 105.855 cumecs.
(C) At 225 m. D/S 65.433 cumecs.
5 Design Discharge 106.00 cumecs.
6 R.L. of maxm. Scour Anticipated

3. At Pier Location 94.763
4. At Abutment Location 96.306
The Detailed Hydraulic Calculation is Presented at the end of this Chapter :
117
6.5 Sub-Soil Investigation Report / Data
Introduction
The objective of sub surface exploration is to determine the characteristics of the existing
Geo-materials in the zone of influences of the proposed bridge site in such a way as to
establish the design parameters which influence the choice and design details of foundation
types. Sub surface exploration for the proposed Bridge in Km. 143 of NH-80 is essential for
design of foundations for proposed spans of the bridge. The bore hole were sunk upto the
depth as mentioned in the following table.
Methodology of Field Operation
i. Boring work
Boring was done by Auger operated manually upto the depth of water table and thereafter by
rotary method collecting mud slurry as per IS. 1892-1972. In this method boring is advanced
by a cutter fixed to drill rods, which are operated by means of pipe wrench. Bentonite slurry
is continuously pushed by a double piston pump through the GI pipe upto the cutting level to
prevent the collapse of the Bore holes. The slurry flowing to the bottom of the cutter mixes
with cut soil and flows to the surface and the soil is settled in the settling pit and the same
mud slurry is reused. The drilling rod attached with diamond bit is lowered slowly with the
help of manually operated winch fixed with the tripod. Seamless flush jointed steel casings of
150mm. internal diameter were used to prevent any caving of the bore hole and were inserted
simultaneously with the advancement of boring
ii. Standard Penetration Test
During sinking of bore holes, Standard Penetration Tests were conducted as per IS. 2131-
1981 at regular intervals of 1.5m. The split spoon sampler was of standard design as per IS.
9640-1980, the outer and inner diameter being 50.8mm. and 38mm. respectively. The SPT
were conducted by driving a hammer of weight 63.5 kg. falling freely on jarring block
connected to the drill rod from a height of 750 mm. Nos. of blows required for the penetration
of 0 to 150mm., 150mm to 300mm. and 300mm. to 450mm. were noted. The No. of blows
required for the penetration from 150mm.to 450mm. was taken as N value. Since soft and
hard rock was found, diamond bits were connected with drill rods.
Representative disturbed samples were collected through split spoon sampler and sealed in
polithene bags with proper identification marks. Undisturbed samples could not be collected
due to cohesion less soil. Rock drilling information and observations were recorded as per IS
4464-1985 & 5313-1980 in field log bore data sheet. Rock coring samples were obtained in a
core barrel sampler of 1.50m. length and 100 to 150mm dia with a diamond bit at its cutting
end by rotary drilling. Samples so obtained were sent to laboratory for determination of
Engineering Properties, general identification and classification. Water table was observed
after 24 hours of completion of bore holes. Rate of penetration, water loss and color of water
were also observed during drilling.
The no. & location of Bore holes with the termination depth are shown in the following table.
Bore hole No. / Termination Depth Date of Commencement Date of Completion
118
Location in m.
1 30.00 04.09.2016 05.09.2016
2 30.00 02.09.2016 03.09.2016
Field Bore log data sheet showing different strata and Standard Penetration Test N value are
enclosed.
Laboratory Test
The following laboratory tests were carried out on disturbed and undisturbed soil samples for
identification and classification properties and for determination of shear strength parameters
and to obtain other properties of sub surface formation as per relevant IS Codes as indicated
below and tabulated.
a. Natural Moisture Content Determination [IS : 2720 (Part-2)-1973]

b. Bulk and Dry Density Determination.
c. Atterberg Limit Tests (LL & PL Test) [IS : 2720 (Part-5)-1985]
d. Specific Gravity Test [IS : 2720 (Part-3)-1980]
e. Sieve Size Analysis [IS : 2720 (Part-4)-1985]
f. Direct Shear Test on representative disturbed sample [IS : 2720 (Part-13)-1986]
g. Unconsolidated Undrained Triaxial Compression Test on UDS [IS:2720 (Part-11)-1971]
h. Consolidation Test to determine Compression Index [IS: 2720 (Part-15)-1986]
The details of different layers of soil encountered in different boreholes are furnished in the
following table on the basis of visual observation, soil classification and Standard Penetration
Values.
Location-B.H.No. 1
Depth Soil Nature of Soil
(In m.) Classification
0.00 – 7.00 CI Stiff brownish grey sandy silty clay
7.00 – 19.00 CI Very stiff brownish grey sandy silty clay
19.00 – 30.00 CI Hard brownish grey sandy silty clay
Location-B.H.No. 2
6.80 – 20.00 CI Very stiff yellowish brown sandy silty clay
Hard brownish yellow sandy silty clay with
20.00 – 30.00 CI
kankar
On close scrutiny of field and laboratory test results it reveals that soil is mainly sandy silty
clay upto entire depth.
Recommendation
Pile Foundation is suggested.
The Detailed Sub-Soil Investigation Data /Report is Presented at the end of this
Chapter
119
Detailed Design of Proposed Bridge
120
Design Of Abutment on Pile Foundation

Solid Wall Type
C o n t e n t s - (Limit State Design)

Design Elements
Input Data
Design of Bearing
Seismic coefficient
Design of Dirtwall
Cantilever return
Analysis of Forces at top of Cap
Design of Abutment Shaft
Analysis of Forces at bottom of Cap
Lateral and Axial Capacity of Pile
Axial Capacity of Pile
Design of Pile
Design of Pile Cap
Design summary used for Drawing
121
DESIGN ELEMENTS
Bridge - in Replacement of Existing Narrow & Damaged Bridge in Km. 143 of NH-80 ( 3 x 14 ) on Pile Foundation
N.H.-Bhagalpur, (Bihar)
Bridge in Replacement of Existing Narrow &

1 Bridge No./Name
Damaged Bridge in Km. 143 of NH-80
2 Chainage (In m.) As per GAD

3 Effective Span Arrangement (In m.) 3 x 14
4 Type of Super Structure() RCC T-Beam & Slab (5-Girder System)
5 Overall width of Superstructure 16.000
6 Carriageway Width 11.000 m
7 Footpath Width 1.500 m
8 Railing Kerb width 0.550 m
9 Outer RCC Railing RCC railing in M-30
9a Inner Crash Barrier Railing RCC M40
10 Wearing over deck slab 65mm thk. Mastic Wearing coat
11 Type of Bearing (MORT&H Standard) Neoprene
12 Expansion Joint 40mm (MORT&H Approved ) Strip Seal Type
13 Type of Sub Structure
Abutment Solid Wall
Pier Solid Wall
Wing Wall Cantilever Return
Seismic Reaction Block Provided for both pier and abutment
14 Type of Foundation
Abutment Pile
Pier Pile
15 Formation Level (In m.) 101.511
16 High Flood Level (In m.) 99.064
17 Bed Level (In m.)
Abutment 96.7
Pier 96.366
18 Scour Depth below H.F.L. (In m.)
As per Hydraulic Restricted at rock lvl. Restricted scour Depth
Abutment 2.732 -121.527 2.732
Pier 4.302 -119.437 4.302
19 Design Velocity (In m./sec.) 0.847
20 Grade of Concrete
Superstructure M30
Sub-Structure M30
Pile and Pile cap M35
21 Seismic Zone Zone-4
22 Importance Factor I=1.2
122
Superstructure has been designed and load as per actual considered in

23 Design Dead Load of superstructure
design
Maximum of (70-R Track Load+Class-A, 70-R Wheel Load+Class-A and

24 Design Live Load
Three Lane Class-A) Loading.
123
Design of Abutment Substructure -(Limit State Design)

Levels and figure shown in following drawings is for calculation purposes, it is not in scale
Date:- 9/15/2016 17:54
Structure Identification No.- in Replacement of Existing Narrow & Damaged Bridge in Km. 143 of NH-80
3.600m RL-101.696 Colour Code
Approach Slab 0.065m wearing coat at Centre of Carriageway
0.860m (Railing Height)

RL-101.511
0.3 (Kerb Height)
0.30
1.787m
RCC T-Beam & Slab RL-99.724
1.415m
0.30
1.22 0.5 Details of Bearing, Pedastal & Abutment Cap

0.04 0.280m
4.787m 0.8 0.160
HFL= 99.064 0.360m
2.500m 0.150.090m
0.400 Pedestal 0.282m
C.G. of Abut. At Base Size= 0.660m 0.250 0.5
C.G. of Abut. Wall
0.020 2.340 Skew Size= 0.660m 0
LWL/LBL 96.366 0.200 0.110 0.220
2.130 2.170 Seismic pad= 0.200 0.500 0.030
Bed e RL 96.700 Pedestal Length= 0.660m Pedestal Width= 0.800m
Length of Each Bearing= 0.500
RL-96.724
1.80 0.095
0.565081 0.929565 RL-94.924 Bottom of slab
0.80 RL-96.605 Seismic Scour Level
Mom.Of structure taken about RL-96.332 Max Scour Level(IRC-78: 703.2)
RL-74.224 RL at foundation
5.100m
C/S as per IRC:SP:73-2015

0.550m 0.45 C.G. of Superstructure 0.45
1.500m 11.000m 1.500 0.550m
16.000m
7.966m
8.000m C.G. of Abutment
0.034m 0.860m
C.G. of Live load
0.065m Wearing coat
101.396 0.000m 0.300m
0.200m 0.250m
0.150m 0.150m
2.750m 2.750m 0.700m
2.62 2.62 2.62 2.62
0.400m
Abutment Cap 16.0 0.500m

0
16.000 0.3 0.15
Maximum Transverse Eccentricity of LL= 2.159m 0.25
Maximum Transverse Eccentricity of FPLL= 6.700m 0.55 0.3
124
Data for Design of Abutment & Foundation

1) Designed as Two Lane (T) or Four Lane (F) = T
2) Type of abutment (Spill through - S, Solid Wall - W) = W
3) Type of Bearing ( Neoprene- N, Pot PTFE - P, Tar Paper - T) = N
4) Type of Foundation ( Open - O, Raft - R, Pile - P, Well - W ) = P
5) RE wall in approach not considered = 0.00
6) Straight Returnwall (Yes / No ) = Yes
7) Overhang of superstructure at abutment = 0.28 m
8) Standard Ef.Span used for DL calculation and Thickness = 14.00 Effective Span for Live Load= 14.00 m
9) Overhang of superstructure at pier = 0.28 m
10) Overall span of the bridge = 14.560 m
11) Number of Span = 3.0 Nos.
12) Minimum Dimension at Support as per IRC: 6-2014 0.365 <= 0.88 m O.K.
13) Longitudinal width of abutment at bottom of abutment Cap = 0.80 m OK
14) Longitudunal Width of Abutment wall at top of Pile Cap = 0.80 m
15) Longitudinal avg. width of abutment wall = 0.800 m
16) Transverse width of abutment Wall = 16.000 m
17) Transverse width of Dirtwall & Abutment Cap = 16.000 m
18) Transverse Width of Abutment Pile Cap = 16.300 m
19) Shear Rating of the neoprene bearings = 940.0 T/m
20) Minimum Thickness of pedastal provided = 0.282 m
21) Dead load reaction at Abutment ## = 150.00 T
22) DL and LL on outer girders at support, DL= 56 LL= 69.00 (1.35DL+1.5LL) 179.00 T
23) Spacing of Girder in Transverse Direction = 2.625 m
24) Number of Long. Girder in Superstructure = 5 Nos.
25) Skew Angle 0.0000 rad. = 0.000 deg
26) Superelevation/ Camber in % = 2.5 %
27) Long. Distance between centre of abutment wall and centre of bearing = 0.020 m
28) Distance of cg of abutment wall from c.g. of Pile Cap ( negative for Right) e= -0.020 m
29) C.G. of super structure from bottom = 1.164 m
2
30) Density of concrete = 2.5 t/m
31) Grade of concrete for abutment substructure = M 30
32) Consider 100% earth pressure , Reduction Coeff. = 1.0
33) Seismic E/P (Dynamic increament) considered in Fnd. Design (Yes or No) = Yes
34) Seismic E/P (Dynamic increament) considered in Sub-Str. Design (Yes or No) = Yes
35) Horizontal seismic force due to earth retained behind abutment & above cap (Yes/No) = No
36) Live load surcharge = 1.20 m
37) Slope of earth fill = 0
38) Seismic Restrainer Long. Dim Trans. Dim Height Nos
Longitudinal Reaction Block 0.350 0.800 1.600 4
Transverse Reaction Block 0.800 0.8 0.8 2
39) Earth face properties of α δ β
Abutment 90 20.0 0
40) Soil Properties c φ γdry
Back Fill Soil 0 30 1.80
41) Seismic coefficient Zone I Z/2 Sa/g R/I
Zone 4 I=1.2 0.120 2.500 2.083
42) cantilever Return Free End Length Depth Fixed Thickness
Dimensions in m 0.60 1.500 1.600 0.30
43) Straight Return Length Ht.above HFL Ht. Below HFL Thickness
Dimensions in m 2.130 2.447 2.340 0.30
44) Live Load Reaction on Abutment in T Load per Span Maximum Minimum CG of LL Ecc
70r Track load 70 59.98 10.03 4.7 3.300m
70 R Wheel load in T 100 65.4 34.6 4.645 3.355m
Class A ( 1-Lane ) in T 43.2 30.701 12.499 3.35 4.650m
Class A ( 3-Lane ) in T 129.6 92.103 37.497 6.85 1.150m
Maximum and Minimum load adopted for 3 Lane 143.2 96.101 47.099 5.841 2.159m
45) Footpath provided on both side(2) or Provided on one Side (1) = 2
46) Weight of Railing per meter (0.75T on each side) MORT&H, RCC -Railing = 1.50 T/m
47) Scour Depth below HFL = 2.732 m
125
Data for Design of Pile

Total Number of Pile in Group = 8 Nos.
48) Diameter of pile = 1.200 m
49) Depth of pile below ground Level = 22.476 m
50) No. of pile in Transverse direction = 4 Nos.
51) No. of pile in longitudinal direction = 2 Nos.
52) Additional Pile at Centre = 0 Nos.
53) Preojection of pile cap from pile = 0.150 m
54) Spacing of pile in Transverse direction = 4.933 m
55) Spacing of pile in Longitudinal direction = 3.600 m
56) Length of pile below pile cap = 20.700 m
57) Effective length of pile below scour level = 20.700 m
58) Grade of Concrete in Pile & Pile cap = M 35 M 35

RL-99.724 Top of Abutment Cap
RL-99.064 HFL
RL-96.700 Bed/Ground Level

1.80
RL-94.924 Cut-off Level
RL-96.605 Seismic Scour Level
RL-96.332 Maximum Scour Level
20.700
16.299
5.1
126
Design of Elatomeric Bearing
Bearing dimensions and their limits

Notation Details per bearing Limits Value Unit
G= Shear modulus 1 N/mm2
bo= Overall breadth 360 mm
lo = Overall length 500 mm
hi = Thickness of each layer 12 mm
n = Number of layers 5 Nos
c= Side elastomer cover 6 mm
hs = Thickness of steel laminate 4 mm
he = hi/2 6 mm
h= n*hi+2*he bo/10 - bo/5 72 mm Safe
ho = = h+(n+1)*hs 96 mm
R = lo/bo <=2 1.38888889 Safe
b = bo-2*hc 348 mm
l = lo-2*hc 488 mm
A = b*l 169824 mm2
S = A/(2*(b+l)*hi) 6-12 8.5 Safe
Forces on Bearing for different Load Cases (Seismic Force in Long. Direction)
Overall Span 14.00 m
Seismic Coefficient Ah= 0.14
Total Live Load per span LL= 1432000 N
Total Dead Load per Span DL= 3000000 N
No of Longitudinal girder NG= 5 Nos
Notation Details per bearing Calculation With LL No. LL Limits Unit
N Reaction 1250000 560000 N
Hb Horizontal force in "b" direction =(LL+DL)*Ah/NG/2 62048 42000 N
Hl Horizontal force in "l" direction =Hb x 0.3 18614.4 12600 N
Δbd Translation in direction "b" =Span in mm*0.0005/2 3.5 3.5 mm
Δld Translation in direction "l" 0 0 mm
σm = N/A =Reaction/Area of Bearing 7.360562 3.297532 2-10 Mpa Safe
αbd = 0.5*σm*hi/(b*S*S) 0.001756 0.000787 radian
αld Angle of rotation in "l" direction 0 0 radian
γdb = Hb/A+Δbd/h 0.413978 0.295926
γdl = Hl/A+Δld/h 0.10961 0.074194
2 2
γd = sqrt(γdb +γdl ) 0.4 0.305085 <=0.7 Safe
γd,all = 0.1*σm+0.2, but<=0.7 0.936056 0.529753
αd = (αbd*b+αld*l)/b 0.001756 0.000787 radian
αall = 0.5*n*σm*hi/(b*S*S) 0.008782 0.003935 radian
τc = 1.5*σm/S 1.298923 0.581917 MPa
τγ =γd 0.4 0.305085 MPa
α bi = 0.5*s m *h i /(b*S 2 ) 0.001756 0.000787 radian
α li = 0.5*σ m *h i /(l*S 2 ) 0.001253 0.000561 radian
τα =0.5*(b2*αbi+l2*αli)/hi2 1.774345 0.794907 MPa
τ = tc+τγ+τα 5.000 1.681909 <=5 Mpa Safe
Shear Rating per bearing=(lo*bo*G/ho)*10-1 =(500*360*1/96)/10 188 t/m
127
Maximum load on Abutment due to Class 70R Wheel Loading

14.28
12.91
9.86
8.49
6.36
4.84
0.88
Live load on span 17 17 17 17 12 12 8
Spacing of Live Load 1.37 3.05 1.37 2.13 1.52 3.96
14.00
0.28
0.28
A1 P2/A2
for 17T for 17T for 17T for 17T for 12T for 12T for 8T
RA1= 17.34 + 15.68 + 11.97 + 10.31 + 5.45 + 4.15 + 0.50 = 65.401 T
RA2= 100 -65.401 = 34.599 T
C= 1.630 Spacing of Wheel= 1.93 as per IRC:6
Maximum load on Abutment due to Class -A Wheel Loading
14.28
13.08
8.78
5.78
2.78
0.00
Live load on span 11.4 11.4 6.8 6.8 6.8 0

Spacing of Live Load 1.2 4.3 3 3 3
14.00
0.28
0.28
A1 for 11.4T for 11.4T for 6.8T for 6.8T for 6.8T for 6.8T P2/A2
RA1= 11.628 + 10.65 + 4.26 + 2.81 + 1.35 + 0.00 = 30.701 T
RA2= 43.2 -30.701 = 12.499 T
128
Maximum load on Abutment due to Class 70R Track Loading
70 T
4.57
14.00
0.28
0.28
A1
Reaction due to 70 Track Load= RA1= 59.975

Reaction due to 70 Track Load= RA2= 10.025
C= 1.625 Spacing of Wheel= 2.1
Calculation of C.G. of Superstructure from Soffit
Element Vert Dim Hor. Dim Nos Area CG Moment

Slab 0.225 16 1 3.6 1.2125 4.365
Hounch 0.1 0.1 8 0.04 1.066667 0.04267
Wearing 0.075 16 1 1.2 1.3875 1.665
Girder(St) 0.7 0.3 5 1.05 0.75 0.7875
Bulb(tap) 0.15 0.3 5 0.225 0.325 0.07313
Girder(St) 0.25 0.3 5 0.375 0.125 0.04688
Left Kerb 0 1.5 1 0 1.35 0
Right Kerb 0 1.5 1 0 1.35 0
Railing 0.86 2 0.625 2.08 1.3
Total 7.115 1.164 8.28017
Add bearing and Pedastal= 0
Total= 1.164
129
Calculation of Transverse Eccentricity of Live Load
1:- 70R Track

70R-Track Class-A
59.975 T 30.701 T
8.500
4.700
C.G of the above load from Edge of the superstructure

=(59.975X4.7+30.701X8.5)/(59.975+30.701)= 5.987
Eccentricity= 2.013
2:- 70R Wheel
65.401 T 30.701 T
8.390
4.645

=(65.401X4.645+30.701X8.39)/(65.401+30.701)= 5.841
Eccentricity= 2.159
3:- TWO Lane of Class A
30.701 T 30.701 T 30.701 T

10.35
6.850
3.35

=(30.701X3.35+30.701X6.85+30.701X10.35)/(30.701+30.701+30.701)= 6.850
Eccentricity= 1.15
130
Distribution of Live Load on Outer Girder including impact
Impact factor= 1.225 Wheel load from edge of the footpath/kerb= 1.63
0.55 32.7005 32.7005

1.630 1.93
\
2.75 2.625
R1 R2
Note: It is assumed that the left wheel load is directly over outer girder if it comes beyond towards inner girder
R1 due to left wheel= 39.80118 t

R1 due to right wheel= 15.759 t
Total Live load on outer Girder= 69.00 t
131
Calculation of Seismic Coefficient
(Z/2) x (Sa/g)
Ah=
(R/I)
Where Ah= Horizontal Seismic Coefficient
Z= Seismic Zone Factor
Sa/g= Avg. Response Acceleration Coefficient
R= Response Reduction Factor
I= Importance of bridge
2 D
T=
1000*F
INPUT DATA
Z= 0.24
R= 2.5 F
I= 1.2
D= 150+96.101 246.10 2461.01 KN
Grade of Concrete 30 L
Length of Structure= 16000
Thickness of Structure= 800.00
Moment of Inertia of Substructure= 6.827E+11
Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete= 27386
Type of Soil Site= Medium
L= 3000
Deflection of Abutment cap tip= 1 mm
(L^3/3E*MI)= 4.814E-07
Hence F= 2077 KN
T= 0.07 sec
Sa/g= 2.5
Z/2= 0.12
R/I= 2.083
Ah= 0.14
132
DESIGN OF DIRT WALL
Height of wall 1.787 m

Thickness of Dirtwall 0.3 m
Angle of Internal Friction 30 Deg.
Bulk Density 1.8 t/m3
Density of Concrete 2.5 t/m3
Live Load Surcharge ( Fill) 1.20 m
Main Bar of dia. Provided 0.016 m

Distribution Steel provided 0.01 m
Partial Safety Factor for Live Load 1.5

Partial Safety Factor for Dead Load 1.35
Partial Safety Factor for Earth Pressure 1.5
Grade of Concrete fck= M 30 N/mm2
Grade of Steel fy= 500 N/mm2
Es= 200000 N/mm2
Dirt wall shall be designed for the forces:

a) Breaking forces considering wheel directly over approach slab or on dirtwall whichever govern
b) Active earth prressure below approach slab, surcharge due approach slab and 1.2m of earth fill
a) Breaking forces and wheel loading

Considering the case when wheels of Class A whehicle is on the Approach Slab and Break is applied
Factored Load on the aaproach slab in T 3 X 11.4 x 1.5 = 51.3 t
Breaking force In T will be 0.2 X 51.3 = 10.26 t
Resistance due to friction between Soil and Approach Slab =m x R
mxR= Tan(2/3 X Phi) X 51.3
= 18.670 t > 10.26 t
Since resistance of soil is greater than the breaking force, load on the dirt wall be zero in this case
Hence, wheel directly on the dirtwall will produce maximum horizontal force when break is applied.
To achieve maximum dispersed load per meter, consider the cases:
Factored Breaking bef.=1.2a+b

Load Classification Axle Load Load (T) Mom.(T) a b beff. Mom./m
Class A One Lane 17.1 3.42 10.216 1.787 1.8 3.9444 2.590
Class A Two Lane 34.2 6.84 20.431 1.787 5.3 7.4444 2.744
Class A Three Lane 51.3 10.26 30.647 1.787 8.8 10.9444 2.800
70R Bogie Load 30 6 17.922 1.787 2.79 4.9344 3.632
Design moment will be maximum of the above loads = 3.632 Tm
b) Active earth prressure
Apprroach Slab
Normal Factored
Coeff. Of horizontal earth pressure Kah= 0.279 0.4185
Coeff. Of vertical earth pressure Kav= 0.102 0.153 H2 H1 1.487 1.79
H3
Earth pressure has been considered below approach slab
H1= Active earth Pressure due to LL surcharge (0.4185*1.8*1.2)
H2=Active earth Pressure due to Approach Slab(0.4185*2.5*0.3)
H3= Active EarthPressure due to Traingular par (0.4185*1.8*1.787)
133
Sl. No. Active Earth Pressre Forces due to Active ELever Arm Moment in Tm
1 H1 0.904 1.615 0.7435 1.201
2 H2 0.314 0.561 0.7435 0.417
3 H3 1.346 1.203 0.625 0.751
Total 3.379 2.369
Design moment will be sum of the H1+H2+H3 = 2.369 tm

Total Design Moment per metre= 6.001 tm
Designing as Cantilever Beam

Cover to the main steel = 50 mm
Effective cover considering 16mm dia. Bar = 58 mm
Effective depth available = 0.242 m
b= 1 m
Effective Depth Required

2
Mu= k*fck*bd where k= 0.1336
Effective depth required def.=Sqrt(M/k*fck*b)
def.= 0.122 Safe
Designed as under reinforced section
Main Steel
Since actual depth provided is more than required, section shall be designed for this depth.
For this condition area of steel shall be obtained by the equation as below
Ast=Mu/0.87*fy*z, where z=d(1-0.416*x/d) and x/d=1.2-(1.22-6.68Mu/fckbd2)1/2

x/d= 0.0991711 z= 0.2320162 m
Area of steel required Ast= 595 mm2 = 0.000595 Sqm
Minimum steel as per IRC:112 cl. 16.5.1.1 @ 0.130% of c/s area = 0.00039 Sqm
Providing 16 mm dia. Bar, Area of bar = 0.000201 Sqm
Spacing=0.000201 X 1000/0.000595 = 338 mm c/c
Maximum spacing shall be lesser of 2h 250mm (Refer IRC:112-16.6.1.1(4)) 250 mm c/c
Say 200 mm c/c Safe
Actual area of steel provided= 0.001005 Sqm
Provide 16 mm dia. Bar @200 mm c/c
Distribution Steel
2
Distribution steel required = 20% X 0.001005 = (Refer IRC:112-16.6.1.1.(3)) 0.000201 m
2
Providing 10 mmdia.Bar, C/Area of bar= 0.0000785 m
Spacing= 0.00007854 X 1000/0.000201 = 391 mm c/c
Say 200 mm c/c Safe
Provide 10 mm dia.Bar @ 200 mm c/c on both face of wall
200 300
2-L 10 dia. Stirrups @ 400 mm c/c
180
120
10 mm dia.Bar @ 200 mm c/c
16 mm dia.Bar @200 mm c/c
134
DESIGN OF CANTILEVER RETURN
Length of the wall 1.50 m

Depth at Start of wall 0.60 m
Depth at End/Support of wall 1.600 m
Thickness of the wall 0.30 m
Angle of Internal Friction 30 Deg.
Bulk Density 1.8 T/m3
Density of Concrete 2.5 T/m3
Weight of the railing per meter 1.50 T/m
Live Load Surcharge ( Fill) 1.20 m
Reinforcement at face "AB" 0.016 m
Earth face horizontal bar 0.012 m

Es= 200000 N/mm2
1.5-1.5Y
X or 1.5 - X
A B
0.6
C D
H1
H2 Y 1.6
1.00 F F
1.6 - Y
E
Fig:- Showing the Cantilver Return with Earth Pressure
Cantilever Return wall shall be designed for the forces:

a) Forces in Horizontal Plane
b) Forces in Vertical Plane
a) Forces in Horizontal Plane
Consider the bending of the pannel in BE plane due to Activ Normal Factored
Coeff. Of horizontal earth pressure Kah= 0.279 0.4185
Coeff. Of vertical earth pressure Kav= 0.102 0.153
H1= Active earth Pressure due to LL surcharge= 0.90396 T/Sqm

H2= Active earth Pressure due to Earth Fil
Consider the very thin strip at "FF" depth "y" below "CD"
H2=0.4185*1.8*0.6+ 0.4185*1.8* Y
Or H2= 0.45198 +0.754Y Where Y/X= 0.667
H2=0.4185*1.8*0.6+ 0.4185*1.8*((1.6-0.6)/1.5) *X
Or H2= 0.45198+ 0.502 *X
135
otal Pressure at "FF"(H1+H2)= 0.452+ 0.90396 +0.754Y

1.356 +0.754Y
Force at FF= (1.356 +0.754Y) * (1.5 - X) , conidering unit thick strip

= (1.356 +0.754Y) * (1.5-1.5Y) Where X/Y= 1.5
= 2.034+ -0.904Y -1.13Y^2
Bending Moment:-
Moment= (2.034+ -0.904Y -1.13Y^2)* (1.5-1.5Y)*0.5

= (2.034+ -0.904Y -1.13Y^2)* (0.75-0.75Y)
= 0.848Y3-0.1695Y^2+-2.2035Y+1.5255
= 0.85 y^3 -0.17 Y^2 -2.204 Y 1.5255
dM/dy= 2.544Y^2 -0.339Y -2.204

= 2.54 Y^2 -0.34 Y -2.204
Equating dM/dy=0
0.339+ - sqrt(0.114921-4 X2.544 X -2.204)

Y=
2 X2.544
Or Y= 1.000 and -0.867

Coresponding Moment will be = 0.000 Tm and 2.756 Tm
Hence maximum bending moment will be = 2.756 Tm
Shear Force:
1.5
Shear= 1.695 '+ 0.5* ∫ (1.356 +0.502X)Ydx
0
1.5
= 1.695 '+ 0.5* ∫ (1.356 +0.502X)* 0.667Xdx
0
1.5
= 1.695 '+ 0.5* ∫ (0.453X +0.168X^2)dx
0
= 1.695 + 0.509 0.189

= 2.393 T
Hence Maximum shear force will be maximum at BE face and will be =2.393T

b= 1.6 m
Mu= k*fck*bd2 where k= 0.1336
def.= 0.066 Safe
Main Steel
x/d= 0.0271497 z= 0.2412442 m
Minimum steel as per IRC:112 cl. 16.5.1.1 @ 0.130% of c/s area 0.0013*0.3X1.0= 0.00039 Sqm
Providing 12 mmdia.Bar, Area of bar= 0.000113 Sqm
Spacing= 0.0001131 X 1000/0.00039 = 290 mm c/c
Say 150 mm c/c
Area of steel provided, Ast= 0.0005080 sqm > 0.000263 (OK)
136
Distribution Steel
Distribution steel required = 20% X 0.000508 = (Refer IRC:112-16.6.1.1.(3)) 0.0001016 sqm
Providing 10 mmdia.Bar, C/Area of bar= 0.0000785 sqm
Spacing= 0.00007854 X 1000/0.0001016 = 773 mm c/c
Say 200 mm c/c Safe
b) Forces in Vertical Plane

Considering the selfweight of the wall and weight of railing as a load on the wall Normal Factored
Self weight of wall= 0.825 1.11375 T
Weiught of railing= 1.5 2.025 T
Design load on the wall = 2.325 3.139 T
Bending moment at support= 2.616 3.5310938 Tm
Shear Force at support= 3.488 4.708125 T
b= 0m
2
def.= 0.171
Main Steel
x/d= 0.0046015 z= 1.5390483 m
Area of steel required Ast= 53 mm2 0.000053 Sqm
Providing 16 mmdia.Bar, Area of bar= 0.0002011 sqm
Nos. of 16 bar provided= 3
Area of steel provided = 0.0006032 sqm

Provide 10 mm dia.Bar @ 200 mm c/c
Returnwall Edge
Provide 12 mm dia.Bar @ 150 mm c/c on inner face of wall
3-16 mmdia.Bar, at top
137
DESIGN OF RETANGULAR RETURN WALL
Wall is designed as cantilever fixed at two side at abutment wall and foundation slab and free at other two edge.
Earth pressure is acting over the wall shall create wrapping of the wall at cantilever edge. Bending moment due
to Earth Pressure at upper end of the cantilever return shall be more than that of lower edge.
1.6 Height of wall H= 4.787 m

Length of wall L= 2.13 m
0.6 Coeff. Of horizontal earth pressure Kah 0.279
Live Load Surchage 1.2 m
Thickness of Returnwall 0.3 m
1.50 Grade of Concrete 30
4.787 Angle of Internal Friction 30 Degree
Dry Density of Back Fill 1.8 T/m3
Density of Concrete 2.5 T/m3
Earth face horizontal bar 0.012 m
Earth face vertical bar 0.012 m
Bottom of Returnwall fixed with Fnd. Yes
2.13
Fig.:- Arrangement of Return wall with abutment and Foundation slab

Es= 200000 N/mm2
Consider the design of wall fixed by the two side as per "Roark Formulas for Stress and Strain"
Normal Factored
Live Load surcharge, q= 0.603 0.9045 t/m3
Traingular earth pressure, q= 2.404 3.606 t/m3
H= Depth of Return wall 4.787 m

L= Length of Return wall 2.13 m
For Live Load surcharge

For L/H= 0.375 β1= 0.353 β2= 0.398
For L/H= 0.5 β1= 0.631 β2= 0.632
Hence, L/H= 0.445 β1= 0.509 β2= 0.529
ML= 1/6 x β1 x q x H^2 MH= 1/6 x β2 x q x H^2
= 1.758 tm = 1.827 tm
For Traingular earth pressure

For L/H= 0.375 β1= 0.212 β2= 0.148
For L/H= 0.5 β1= 0.328 β2= 0.2
Hence, L/H= 0.445 β1= 0.277 β2= 0.177
ML= 1/6 x β1 x q x H^2 MH= 1/6 x β2 x q x H^2

3.815 tm 2.438 tm
Total Moment along base of wall per meter= 5.573 tm
Total Moment along vertical face of wall per meter= 4.265 tm
138
b) Due to Cantilever part of Return Wall

Mz= Moment at junction of Cantilever and Returnwall (Refer Cantilever Return) 2.756 tm
Shear force at junction of Cantilever and Returnwall (Refer Cantilever Return) 2.393 t
Design moment at the face of return wall =2.756+2.393x2.13 = 7.85309 tm
Design moment per meter height at the face of return wall = 1.641 tm
Total Design Moment at the face of abutment wall per metre =4.265+1.641 = 5.906 tm
Total Design Moment at the face of pile/well cap per metre = 5.573 tm
1. Area of steel required for Horizontal bars

b= 1 m
2
Effective depth required def.=Sqrt(M/k*fck*b) def.= 0.121
x/d= 0.0958652 z= 0.234269 m

Minimum steel as per IRC:112 cl. 16.5.1.1 @ 0.130% 0.0003900 Sqm
Spacing=0.25 X 3.14159 X 0.012 X 0.012 X 1000/0.001 = 195 mm c/c
Say 150 mm c/c Safe
2. Area of steel required for Vertical bars

Cover to the main steel= 50 mm
Effective cover considering 12mm dia. Vertical Bar +1.2mm dia. Horizontal Bar= 68 mm
Effective depth available= 0.232 m
b= 1m
2
Effective depth required def.=Sqrt(M/k*fck*b) def.= 0.118 m
x/d= 0.1002508 z= 0.2223246 m

Minimum steel as per IRC:112 cl. 16.5.1.1 @ 0.130% 0.00039000 Sqm
Spacing=0.25 X 3.14159 X 0.012 X 0.012 X 1000/0.001 = 196 mm c/c
Say 150 mm c/c Safe
Provide 12 mm dia. Bar @150 mm c/c Area of Steel provided= 0.000754 Sqm
Distribution steel required = 20% X = (Refer IRC:112-16.6.1.1.(3)) 0.0001508 Sqm

Providing 10 mmdia.Bar, C/Area of bar= 7.854E-05 Sqm
Spacing= 0.00007853975 X 1000/0.0001508 = 521 mm c/c
Say 150 mm c/c Safe
139
0.3
Dirtwall 10 mm dia.Bar @ 150 mm c/c (b16)
Abutment Cap 10 mm dia.Bar @ 150 mm c/c (b13)
12 mm dia.Bar @ 150 mm c/c (b15)

12 mm dia.Bar @150 mm c/c (b12)
Abutment Shaft
Return Wall
Foundation Slab
Levelling Course
Fig.:- Reinforcement details in return wall
140
LOAD AND MOMENT @ Top Of PILE CAP

Horizontal Seismic coefficient =0.12 X 2.5 / 2.083 = 0.144
vertical seismic coefficient =0.67 x 0.144 = 0.09648
a) Dead Loads and Moments of Superstructure

Service Condition
Total Dead Load of Suerstructure on abutment abutment = 150.000
Long. Moment about c.g. line of abutment base = 150 X 0.02 = 3.000 tm
Transverse Moment = 150 X 0.034 = 5.100 tm
Seismic Condition (Vertical)
Vertical load at abutment due to dead load =150 X 0.09648 = 14.472 t
Long. Moment about centre line of abutment =14.472 X 0.02 = 0.289 tm
Transverse Moment = 14.472 X 0.034 = 0.492 tm
Seismic Condition (Horizontal)
Horizontal load at abutment =150 X 0.144 = 21.6 t
Longitudinal Moment about centre line of abutment at bas=21.6X (3+0.282+0.09+1.164)= 87.178 tm
b) dead load and moment of substructure

Service Condition
Approach Slab including MORT&H, RCC -Railing =0.5 X 3.6 X (1.5+16X0.3X2.5)= = 24.300 t
Cantilever Return =2.2*0.5*1.5*0.3*2*2.5 = 2.475 t
Return wall =2*2.13*0.3*(2.447+2.34)*2.5 = 15.294465 t
Dirt Wall =0.3 X 1.787 X 16 X 2.5 = 21.444 t
Abutment cap =(0.5*1.22*16)*2.5 = 24.400 t
Longitudinal Reaction Block = 4.480 t
Transverse Reaction Block =2*(0.8*0.8*0.8)*2.5 = 2.560 t
Pedastal =(0.282*0.66*0.8*5)*2.5 = 1.861 t
Abutment Wall =2.5 X 0.5X(0.8+ 0.8)X16 X 2.5 = 80.000 t
Return wall in HFL condition =2*(2.447*2.13*0.3*2.5+2.34*2.13*0.3*(2.5-0. = 14.845887 t
Weight of abutment in HFL condition

Width of abutment wall at HFL= 0.8
Abutment Wall above HFL =0.16 X0.5X (0.8+0.8) X 16 X 2.5 = 5.12 t
Abutment Wall below HFL =2.34X0.5 X (0.8+0.8) X 16 X (2.5-0.15) = 70.387 t
75.507 t
Particulars Load (T) Lever arm (m) Moment
Approach Slab including MORT&H, RCC -R 24.300 =-(0.4+0.2+.1) -0.7000 -17.010
Cantilever Return 2.475 -((2*0.6+1.6)*1.5 /((0.6+1.6)*3)+(2.13+0.4)) -3.1660 -7.836
Dirt Wall 21.444 =-(0.4+0.2-0.15) -0.4500 -9.650
Abutment cap 24.400 =1.22 X 0.5 - 0.2 - 0.4 0.0100 0.244
Longitudinal Reaction Block 4.480 =0.35*0.5+0.03+0.02+0.25/2 0.3500 1.568
Transverse Reaction Block 2.560 0.5*0.8+0.3-0.2-0.4 0.1000 0.256
Pedastal 1.861 =0.28+0.04+0.3-0.2-0.4 0.0200 0.037
Abutment Wall Dry Condition 80.000 =0.4-0.4 0.0000 0.000
Return Wall Dry Condition 15.294 =-(1.065+0.4) -1.4650 -22.406
Abutment Wall HFL Condition 75.507 =0.4-0.4 0.0000 0.000
Return Wall HFL Condition 12.304 =-(1.065+0.4) -1.4650 -18.025
Total Dry/LWL condition 176.815 -54.797
Total HFL condition 169.331 -50.416

Approach Railing & Kerb =24.3 X 0.09648 = 2.344 t
Cantilever Return =2.475 X 0.09648 = 0.239 t
Dirt Wall =21.444 X 0.09648 = 2.069 t
Abutment cap =24.4 X 0.09648 = 2.354 t
Longitudinal Reaction Block =4.48 X 0.09648 = 0.432 t
Transverse Reaction Block =2.56 X 0.09648 = 0.247 t
Pedastal =1.8612 X 0.09648 = 0.180 t
141
Abutment Wall Dry Condition =80 X 0.09648 = 7.718 t

Return Wall Dry Condition =15.294465 X 0.09648 = 1.476 t
Abutment Wall HFL Condition =75.507 X 0.09648 = 7.285 t

Return Wall HFL Condition =12.303945 X 0.09648 = 1.187 t

Approach Slab including MORT&H, RCC -R 2.344 =-(0.4+0.2+.1) -0.7000 -1.641
Cantilever Return 0.239 -((2*0.6+1.6)*1.5 /((0.6+1.6)*3)+(2.13+0.4)) -3.1660 -0.757
Dirt Wall 2.069 =-(0.4+0.2-0.15) -0.4500 -0.931
Abutment cap 2.354 =1.22 X 0.5 - 0.2 - 0.4 0.0100 0.024
Longitudinal Reaction Block 0.432 =0.35*0.5+0.03+0.02+0.25/2 0.3500 0.151
Transverse Reaction Block 0.247 0.5*0.8+0.3-0.2-0.4 0.1000 0.025
Pedastal 0.180 =0.28+0.04+0.3-0.2-0.4 0.0200 0.004
Abutment Wall Dry Condition 7.718 0.0000 0.000
Return Wall Dry Condition 1.476 -1.4650 -2.162
Abutment Wall HFL Condition 7.285 =0.4-0.4 0.0000 0.000
Return Wall HFL Condition 1.187 -1.4650 -1.739

Approach Slab including MORT&H, RCC -R 4.688 =4.787 + 0.86 X 0.5 5.217 24.457
Cantilever Return 0.478 =4.787-(a2+b2+ab)/(12a+6b) 4.556 2.178
Dirt Wall 4.138 =2.5 + 0.5 + 1.787 X 0.5 3.8935 16.111
Abutment cap 4.708 =3 - 0.25 2.750 12.947
Longitudinal Reaction Block 0.864 =2.5+0.5+0.5*1.6 3.8 3.283
Transverse Reaction Block 0.494 =2.5+0.5+0.5*0.8 3.4 1.680
Pedastal 0.360 =2.5+0.5+0.5*0.282 3.141 1.131
Abutment Wall Dry Condition 15.436 =0.5 X 2.5 1.25 19.295
Return Wall Dry Condition 2.952 =0.5 X 4.787 2.3935 7.066
Abutment Wall HFL Condition 14.570 =0.5 X 2.5 1.25 19.295
Return Wall HFL Condition 2.374 =0.5 X 4.787 2.3935 5.682
Dry/LWL condition 34.118 88.148
Total HFL condition 32.674 86.764
Earth above Pile Cap
Behind Dirtwall 0.000 =0.5*2.287+2.5 3.64 0.000
Behind Abutment Wall 0.000 = 0.5X 2.5 1.25 0.000
Behind Dirtwall Above HFL 0.000 =0.5*2.287+2.5 3.6435 0.000
Behind Abutment Wall Above HFL 0.000 =0.5*0.16+2.34 2.42 0.000
Behind Abutment Wall Below HFL 0.000 =0.5*2.34 1.17 0.000
Total Dry/LWL condition 34.118 88.148
*Where a=0.6 & b=1.6
c) Live Load and moment

Sl. No. Particulars of load Service Condition Transverse Moment
Reaction on Abutment Maximum Minimum Eccentricity Max Min
1 70R Track Load 59.975 10.025 3.3 197.918 33.083
2 70 R Wheeled 65.4 34.6 3.355 219.417 116.083
3 Class A (1 - Lanes) 30.701 12.499 4.65 142.76 58.12
4 Class A ( 3-Lane ) in T 92.103 37.497 1.15 105.918 43.122
Design load will be Maximum of 3-Lane of Class A and 1-Lane of Class 70R with one lane of Class-A
142
Service Condition
Maximum Reaction Rb (T)= 96.101 t
Min. Reaction 47.099 t
Lever arm value, = 0.020 m
Maximum longitudinal moment about the base =96.101 X 0.02 = 1.92 t
Min Longitudinal moment about base =47.099 X 0.02 = 0.94 t
Maximum transeverse eccentricity of Live Load = 2.159 m
Maximum transverse moment =96.101 X 2.159 = 219.42 tm
Minimum Transverse moment =47.099 X 2.159 = 116.08 tm

Considering 20% of Live Load , Refer IRC 6:2014, Table-1
Maximum Reaction =96.101 X 0.2 X 0.09648 = 1.854 t
Minimum Reaction =47.099 X 0.2 X 0.09648 = 0.909 t
Maximum longitudinal moment about the base =1.854 X 0.02 = 0.037 tm
Minimum longitudinal moment about base =0.909 X 0.02 = 0.018 tm
Maximum transeverse eccentricity = 2.159 m

Maximum horizontal force in Transverse direction =96.101 X 0.2 X 0.144 = 2.768 t
Minimum horizontal force in transverse direction =47.099 X 0.2 X 0.144 = 1.356 t
Lever arm value, =4.787 + 1.2 (Refer IRC:6-2014 Cl. 211.3) = 5.987 m
Maximum Transverse moment about the base =2.768 X 5.987 = 16.572 tm
Minimum Transverse moment about base =1.356 X 5.987 = 8.118 tm
d) Footpath Live Load

Intensity of live load =500 - ((40 X 14 - 300)/9) = 471.11 kg/m2
Maximum Reaction on Abutment =2X (471.112 X 14.56 X 1.5)/1000X 2 10.29 t
Minimum Reaction on abutment =(2-1)X(471.112X 14.56X1.5)/1000X 2 5.14 t
Maximum Transverse moment due to footpath load =10.289x0 = 0.00 tm
Minimum Transverse moment due to footpath load =5.14453333333333 x 6.7 = 34.47 tm
Maximum Longitudinal moment due to footway live load = 10.289 X 0.02 = 0.21 tm
Minimum Longitudinal Moment due to footway live load = 5.145 X 0.02 = 0.10 tm
e) Horizontal Forces due to Braking

70R - Track = 14 t
70R - Wheeled = 20 t
Class A (1 - Lanes) = 8.64 t
Normal Case Seismic Case
Rg =Maximum dead load reaction 150 30 t
Rq = Reaction from free end due to live load =96.101 + 10.289 106.39 21.278 t
Fh '=Horizontal force due to Breaking 28.64 5.728 t
Normal Case
Horizontal force at bearing level in Longitudinal direction= Fh/2+Vr*ltc
Change in length due to Temparature and Shrinkage ltc= (0.0000117*34+0.0002)x14.56/2 = 0.0040 m
Fh/2+Vr*ltc= 28.64*0.5+940*0.004 = 18.080 t
F F*Cos(0) F*Sin(0)
Max Long. horizontal Force on abutment 18.080 18.08 0 t
Minimum Longitudinal force on abutment 18.080 18.08 0 t
M M*Cos(0) M*Sin(0)
Max. Long. moment at base of abutment= 18.08 X (3 + 0.282 + 0.09) 60.966 60.966 0 tm
Min. Long. moment at base of abutment= 18.08 X (3 + 0.282 + 0.09) 60.966 60.966 0 tm
Max. Vertical Reaction on Abutment due to braking =28.64 X 0.5 X (1.2 + 0.065 + 1.416)/14= 2.741 t
Min. Vertical Reaction on Abutment due to braking -2.741 t
143
Seismic Case
Fh/2+Vr*ltc= 5.728*0.5+940*0.004 = 6.624 t
F F*Cos(Nos) F*Sin(Nos)
Max Long. horizontal Force on abutment 6.624 6.624 0t
Minimum Longitudinal force on abutment 6.624 6.624 0t
M M*Cos(Nos) M*Sin(Nos)
Max. Long. moment at base of abutment= 6.624 X (3 + 0.282 + 0.09) 22.336 22.336 0 tm
Min. Long. moment at base of abutment= 6.624 X (3 + 0.282 + 0.09) 22.336 22.336 0 tm
f) Earth presure For Abutment wall

Earth presuure coefficient Item Angle in Degree Angle in Radian
Angle which earth face of the wall makes with vertical α= 90 0 1.57080
Angle of internal friction of soil φ= 30 0 0.52360
Angle of friction between wall and the earth fill δ= 20.0 0 0.34907
Angle beta β= 00 0.00000
Ka = sin2 (α + φ)
sin (α). sin (α-δ). [1 + {sin (φ+δ). sin(φ-β) / sin (α-δ). sin (α+β)} 1/2 ]2
= 0.749995759
2.523
= 0.297
Horizontal component = Kah= 0.297 1*COS(90-90+20)= 0.279
Vertical component = Kav 0.297 1*SIN(90-90+20)= 0.102
Loads and Moments due to earth pressure :

i) Service Condition (Dry/LWL Case):
Earth Pressure -
F1 (i) Live Load Surcharge (f1)=1.2 X 1.8 X 0.279= 0.603 t/m2
2.287 (ii) Earth pressure due to fill (f2)=1.8 X 0.279 X 2.287= 1.149 t/m2
F2
(iii) Earth pressure due to fill (f3)=1.8 X 0.279 X (2.287+1.2)= 1.751 t/m2
2.500m (iv) Earth pressure due to fill (f4)=1.8 X 0.279 X 2.5= 1.256 t/m2
Leverarm calculation :
F3 Lever arm 1= 0.5 X 2.287+2.5 Lever arm 3= 0.5 X 2.5
F4 Lever arm 2= 0.42 X 2.287+2.5 Lever arm 4= 0.42 X 2.5
Earth Pressure Forces -

Serial No. Force (t) Lever Arm Moment
F1 =0.603 X 2.287 X (16-0.6) 21.238 3.644 77.390 tm
F2 =0.5 X 1.149 X 2.287 X (16-0.6) 20.234 3.461 70.029 tm
F3 =1.751 X 2.5 X (16-0.6) 67.414 1.250 84.268 tm
F4 =0.5 X 1.256 X 2.5 X (16-0.6) 24.178 1.050 25.387 tm
Total 133.06 257.07
ii) Service Condition (HFL Case):

Earth Pressure -
F1 (i) Live Load Surcharge (p1)=1.2 X 1.8 X 0.279= 0.603 t/m2
F2 2.287 (ii) Earth pressure due to fill (p2)=1.8 X 0.279 X 2.287= 1.149 t/m2
(iii) Earth pressure due to fill (p3)=1.8 X 0.279 X (2.287+1.2)= 1.751 t/m3
2.447 (iv) Earth pressure due to fill (p4)=1.8 X 0.279 X 0.16= 0.08 t/m3
F3
0.160 (v) Earth pressure due to fill (p5)=1.8 X 0.279 X (2.447+1.2)= 1.832 t/m3
F4
(vi) Earth pressure due to fill (p6)=1 X 0.279 X 2.34= 0.653 t/m3
Leverarm calculation : Refer IRC, Cl.-710.4.7
F5 2.340m Lever arm 1= 0.5 X 2.287+0.16+2.34 Lever arm 4= 0.42 X 0.16+2.34
F6 Lever arm 2= 0.42 X 2.287+0.16+2.34 Lever arm 5= 0.5 X 2.34
Lever arm 3= 0.5 X 0.16+2.34 Lever arm 6= 0.33 X 2.34
144

F1 =0.603 X 2.287 X (16-0.6) 21.238 3.644 77.381 tm
F2 =0.5 X 1.149 X 2.287 X (16-0.6) 20.234 3.461 70.021 tm
F3 =1.751 X 0.16 X (16-0.6) 4.314 2.420 10.440 tm
F4 =0.5 X 0.08 X 0.16 X (16-0.6) 0.099 2.407 0.238 tm
F5 =1.832 X 2.34 X (16-0.6) 66.018 1.170 77.241 tm
F6 =0.5 X 0.653 X 2.34 X (16-0.6) 11.766 0.772 9.086 tm
Total 123.67 244.41
Seismic Condition : Refer IRC:6-2014 Cl.-219.5.4

Additional loads and moments due to Seismic (Refer IS 1893, 1984 cluse - 8.11)
(1+ α v ) cos2 (φ−λ−α) 1 '2
Ca cos λ cos2 α cos(δ+α+λ) x sin(φ+δ) sin(φ−β−λ)
1+ cos(α−β) cos(δ+α+λ)
Do not delete hidden row
Where αh= Horizontal Seismic Coefficient 0.1440
αv= Vertical Seismic Coefficient 0.0720
φ= Angle of internal friction of soil 0.5236
-
λ= tan 1(α h/(1+ α v ))= 0.1532
tan-1(α h/(1- α v ))= 0.1328
α= Angle which earth face of wall make with vertical 0.0000
δ= Angle of friction of wall and earth fill 0.3491
β= 0.0000
0.931529886 1 '2
Ca=
0.866226369
x 0.277300402
1 0.876492006
Or, Ca= 0.44
Horizontal component = Cah= 0.440 *1*COS(90-90+20) = 0.413
Vertical component = Cav 0.440 *1*SIN(90-90+20) = 0.150
Dynamic Increament:
Cah-Kah= 0.134 = 0.130
iii) Seismic Condition (Dry/LWL Case)

Earth Pressure:
(i) Live Load Surcharge (p1)=1.2 X 1.8 X 0.13= 0.281 t/m2
Fs1 2.287m (ii) Earth pressure due to fill (f2)=1.8 X 0.13 X 2.287= 0.535 t/m2
Fs2 (iii) Earth pressure due to fill (f3)=1.8 X 0.13 X (2.287+1.2)= 0.816 t/m2
(iv) Earth pressure due to fill (f4)=1.8 X 0.13 X 2.5= 0.585 t/m2
Fs3 2.500m Lever arm 1= 0.66 X 2.287+2.5 Lever arm 3= 0.66 X 2.5
Fs4 Lever arm 2= 0.50 X 2.287+2.5 Lever arm 4= 0.50 X 2.5

F1 =0.281 X 2.287 X (16-0.6) 9.897 4.009 39.677 tm
F2 =0.5 X 0.535 X 2.287 X (16-0.6) 9.421 3.644 34.330 tm
F3 =0.816 X 2.5 X (16-0.6) 31.416 1.650 51.836 tm
F4 =0.5 X 0.585 X 2.5 X (16-0.6) 11.261 1.250 14.076 tm
Total 62.00 139.920
--
145
iv) Seismic Condition (HFL Case)

Earth Pressure -
Fs1 (i) Live Load Surcharge (ps1)=1.2 X 1.8 X 0.13= 0.281 t/m2
Fs2 2.287 (ii) Earth pressure due to fill (ps2)=1.8 X 0.13 X 2.287= 0.535 t/m2
(iii) Earth pressure due to fill (ps3)=1.8 X 0.13 X (2.287+1.2 0.816 t/m3
2.447 (iv) Earth pressure due to fill (ps4)=1.8 X 0.13 X 0.16= 0.037 t/m3
Fs3
0.16 (v) Earth pressure due to fill (ps5)=1.8 X 0.13 X (2.447+1.2) 0.853 t/m3
Fs4
(vi) Earth pressure due to fill (ps6)=1 X 0.13 X 2.34= 0.304 t/m3
Fs5 2.34 Leverarm calculation :

Fs6 Lever arm 1= 0.66 X 2.287+0.16+2.34 Lever arm 4= 0.50 X 0.16+2.34
Lever arm 2= 0.50 X 2.287+0.16+2.34 Lever arm 5= 0.66 X 2.34
Fs1 =0.281 X 2.287 X (16-0.6) 9.897 4.009 39.681 tm
Fs2 =0.5 X 0.535 X 2.287 X (16-0.6) 9.421 3.644 34.325 tm
Fs3 =0.816 X 0.16 X (16-0.6) 2.011 2.446 4.917 tm
Fs4 =0.5 X 0.037 X 0.16 X (16-0.6) 0.046 2.420 0.110 tm
Fs5 =0.853 X 2.34 X (16-0.6) 30.739 1.544 47.473 tm
Fs6 =0.5 X 0.304 X 2.34 X (16-0.6) 5.477 1.170 6.409 tm
Total 57.59 132.92
--
f) Wind Load
Top Bed/LWL Element Ht Mean Ht. Pressure Load/m Toal Load Moment
Elements RL RL In m In m Kg/m2 Kg/m T Tm
(70R-W-15.12m) 101.511 96.700 --- 6.311 --- 300.000 2.184 13.783224
Railing 102.556 96.700 0.860 5.426 70.130 60.312 0.439 2.382014
Deck& Kerb 101.696 96.700 1.600 4.196 63.980 102.368 0.745 3.12602
Abutment Cap 99.724 96.700 0.500 2.774 56.257 28.129 0.034 0.0951947
Abutment Shaft 99.224 96.700 2.524 1.262 47.572 120.072 0.096 0.1212244
Total 3.498 19.508
Railing 102.556 96.700 0.860 5.426 --- 240.000 1.747 9.479222
Deck& Kerb 101.696 96.700 1.600 4.196 --- 240.000 1.747 7.330412
Abutment Cap 99.724 96.700 0.500 2.774 --- 240.000 0.293 0.8122272
Abutment Shaft 99.224 96.700 2.524 1.262 --- 240.000 0.192 0.242304
Total 3.979 17.864
(70R-W-15.2m) 101.696 96.700 --- 4.196 --- 450.000 3.276 13.746096
At Bed/Lwl Level At top of Cap At bottom of Cap

Design force & Moment Force Moment Force Moment Force Moment
Both Span Intact 3.979 19.508 3.979 19.412 3.979 26.574
At Bed/Lwl Level At top of Cap At bottom of Cap

Span Dislodged 0.485 1.055 0.485 1.043 0.485 1.916
146
3 WIND LOADS(in HFL condition)

Top HFL Element Ht Mean Ht. Pressure Load/m Toal Load Moment
(70R-W-15.2m) 101.511 99.064 --- 3.947 --- 300.000 2.184 8.620248
Railing 102.556 99.064 0.860 3.062 57.841 49.743 0.362 1.108444
Deck& Kerb 101.696 99.064 1.600 1.832 50.992 81.587 0.594 1.088208
Abutment Cap 99.724 99.064 0.500 0.410 42.460 21.230 0.026 0.0106192
Abutment Shaft 99.224 99.064 0.160 0.080 40.480 6.477 0.005 0.0004145
Total 3.171 10.828
Railing 102.556 99.064 0.860 3.062 --- 120.000 0.874 2.674657
Deck& Kerb 101.696 99.064 1.600 1.832 --- 240.000 1.747 3.200504
Abutment Cap 99.724 99.064 0.500 0.410 --- 240.000 0.293 0.120048
Abutment Shaft 99.224 99.064 0.160 0.080 --- 240.000 0.192 0.01536
Total 3.105 6.011
(70R-W-15.2m) 101.696 99.064 --- 1.832 --- 450.000 3.276 6.001632
At HFL At top of Cap At bottom of Cap

Both Span Intact 3.276 10.828 3.276 18.494 3.276 24.391
At HFL At top of Cap At bottom of Cap

Span Dislodged 0.485 0.135 0.485 1.270 0.485 2.142
SUMMARY OF FORCES AND MOMENT

a) Basic Combination (Dry/LWL Case) :
Partial Vertical Horizontal Transverse Longitudina Transverse
Particulars of Loads Safety l Moment
Factor Load (T) Load (HL) Load (HT) (TM) Moment
DL+SIDL Superstructure 1.35 202.500 4.050 6.885
SIDL Wearing Coat (WC) 1.75 27.590 0.552 0.938
DL Substructure 1.35 238.700 -73.976 0.000
Live Loads
CWLL Max 1.5 144.152 2.883 329.126
Min 70.649 1.413 174.125
FPLL Max 1.5 15.434 0.309 0.000
Min 7.717 0.154 51.703
Breaking & Bearing Max. 1.5 4.112 27.120 0.000 91.449 0.000
Min. -4.112 27.120 0.000 91.449 0.000
Earth Pressure 1.5 199.595 0.000 385.610 0.000
Wind ForcSpan Intact 1.5 0.000 5.968 0.000 29.118
Span Dislodged 0.000 0.727 0.000 1.564
Max. 632.487 226.715 0.000 410.876 336.949
Service Condition Total
Min. 543.043 226.715 0.000 409.252 233.650
Max. 632.487 226.715 5.968 410.876 366.067
Wind-Span Intact Total
Min. 543.043 226.715 5.968 409.252 262.768
Span Dislodged Total 238.700 199.595 0.000 311.634 0.000
147
b) Basic combination (HFL Case) :

DL+SIDL Superstructure 1.35 202.500 4.050 6.885
DL Substructure 1.35 228.597 -73.976 0.000
Live Loads
CWLL Max 1.5 144.152 2.883 329.126
Min 70.649 1.413 174.125
FPLL Max 1.5 15.434 0.309 0.000
Min 7.717 0.154 51.703
Min. -4.112 27.120 0.000 91.449 0.000
Earth Pressure 1.5 0.000 185.504 0.000 366.609 0.000
Wind ForcesSpan Intact 1.5 0.000 4.914 0.000 27.741
Span Dislodged 0.000 0.000 0.727 0.000 1.905
-- 1.5 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Max. 622.384 212.624 0.000 391.876 336.949
Min. 532.941 212.624 0.000 390.251 233.650
Max. 622.384 212.624 4.914 391.876 364.689
Min. 532.941 212.624 4.914 390.251 261.391
Span Dislodged Total 228.597 185.504 0.000 292.633 0.000
Scour All Not Max. -- -- -- -- --
Around Applicable Min. -- -- -- -- --
c) Seismic Combination- Seismic in longitudinal Direction (Dry/LWL Case)
Particulars of Loads
Safety Load (T) Load (HL) Load (HT) l Moment Moment
DL+SIDL Superstructure Normal 1 150.000 3.000 5.100
SIDL Wearing Coat (WC) 1 15.766 0.315 0.536
0.3 r3 4.798 0.096
Seismic
icl. WC
1.0 r1 23.870 96.341

0.3 r2 7.161 28.902
DL Substructure Normal 1 176.815 -54.797
0.3 r3 5.118 -1.586
Substruct
Seismic
ure
1.0 r1 34.118 88.148

0.3 r2 10.235 26.444
Live Loads 20%
CWLL Max Normal 1 19.220 0.384 43.88
0.3 r3 0.556 0.011 1.20
Seismic
CWLL
max
1.0 r1 0.000 0.000

0.3 r2 0.830 4.972
Min Normal 9.420 0.188 23.217
0.3 r3 0.273 0.005 0.589
Seismic
CWLL
min
1.0 r1 0.000 0.000

0.3 r2 0.407 2.435
FPLL Max 1 10.289 0.206 0.00
Min 5.145 0.103 34.47
Breaking & Max 1 0.548 6.624 0.000 22.336 0.000
Bearing Min -0.548 6.624 0.000 22.336 0.000
Earth Pressure Normal 1 0.000 133.063 0 257.073 0
Seismic 61.995 139.920
Max. 383.110 277.897 0.000 611.765 50.720
Downward Seismic Effect Total
Min. 373.026 277.474 0.000 609.027 29.442
Max. 330.635 277.897 0.000 614.093 47.246
Upward Seismic Effect Total
Min. 321.118 277.474 0.000 611.367 27.192
148
d) Seismic Combination - Seismic in Transverse Direction (Dry/LWL Case)

0.3 r3 4.798 0.087
Seismic
icl. WC
1.0 r2 23.870 96.341
0.3 r1 7.161 28.902
Substruct 0.3 r3 5.118 -1.586
Seismic
ure 1.0 r2 34.118 88.148

0.3 r1 10.235 26.444
Live Loads 20%
CWLL Max Normal 1 19.220 0.384 43.883
0.3 r3 0.556 0.011 1.201
Seismic
CWLL
max
1.0 r2 2.768 16.572

0.3 r1 0.000 0.000
Min Normal 9.420 0.188 23.217
0.3 r3 0.273 0.005 0.589
Seismic
CWLL
min
1.0 r2 1.356 8.118

0.3 r1 0.000 0.000
FPLL Max 1 10.289 0.206 0.000
Min 5.145 0.103 34.468
Breaking & Max 1 0.548 6.624 0.000 22.336 0.000
Bearing Min -0.548 6.624 0.000 22.336 0.000
Earth Pressure Normal 1 133.063 257.073
Seismic 61.995 139.920
Max. 383.110 201.682 78.153 366.634 306.592
Min. 373.026 201.682 76.741 366.432 276.859
Max. 330.635 201.682 78.153 369.610 304.190
Min. 314.877 201.682 76.741 369.317 310.150
e) Seismic Combination - Seismic in longitudinal Direction(HFL Case)

0.3 r3 4.798 0.096
Seismic
icl. WC
1.0 r1 23.870 96.341

0.3 r2 7.161 28.902
DL Substructure Normal 1 169.331 -54.797 0.000
0.3 r3 4.901 -1.586
Substruct
Seismic
ure
1.0 r1 32.674 86.764

0.3 r2 9.802 26.029
Live Loads 20%
CWLL Max Normal 1 19.220 0.384 43.883
0.3 r3 0.556 0.011 1.201
Seismic
CWLL
max
1.0 r1 0.000 0.000

0.3 r2 0.830 4.972
Min Normal 9.420 0.188 23.217
0.3 r3 0.273 0.005 0.589
Seismic
CWLL
min
1.0 r1 0.000 0.000

0.3 r2 0.407 2.435
FPLL Max 1 10.289 0.206 0.000
Min 5.145 0.103 34.468
Breaking & Max 1 0.548 6.624 0.000 22.336 0.000
149
Bearing Min -0.548 6.624 0.000 22.336 0.000

Earth Pressure Normal 1 0.000 123.669 0.000 244.406 0.000
Seismic 132.916 57.590
-- 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Max. 375.410 337.547 0.000 514.654 50.184
Min. 359.085 337.123 0.000 511.814 63.374
Max. 323.368 337.547 0.000 517.613 47.783
Min. 307.610 337.123 0.000 514.783 62.196
f) Seismic Combination - Seismic in Transverse Direction (HFL Case)

0.3 r3 4.798 0.087
Seismic
icl. WC
1.0 r2 23.870 96.341

0.3 r1 7.161 28.902
0.3 r3 4.901 -1.586
Substruct
Seismic
ure
1.0 r2 32.674 86.764

0.3 r1 9.802 26.029
Live Loads 20%
CWLL Max Normal 1 19.220 0.384 43.883
0.3 r3 0.556 0.011 1.201
Seismic
CWLL
max
1.0 r2 2.768 16.572

0.3 r1 0.000 0.000
Min Normal 9.420 0.188 23.217
0.3 r3 0.273 0.005 0.589
Seismic
CWLL
min
1.0 r2 1.356 8.118

0.3 r1 0.000 0.000
FPLL Max 1 10.289 0.206 0.000
Min 5.145 0.103 34.468
Breaking & Max 1 0.548 6.624 0.000 22.336 0.000
Bearing Min -0.548 6.624 0.000 22.336 0.000
Earth Pressure Normal 1 0.000 123.669 0.000 244.406 0.000
Seismic 132.916 57.590
-- 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Max. 375.410 263.209 76.276 271.637 304.793
Min. 359.085 263.209 74.864 271.333 309.528
Max. 323.368 263.209 76.276 274.614 302.391
Min. 307.610 263.209 74.864 274.321 308.350
150
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF SHAFT (Dry/LWL Condition)

STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF SHAFT
Max. Horizontal Seismic Moment and corresponding Upward seismic force
Grade of Concrete fck= M 30 N/mm2 Grade of Steel fy= 500 N/mm2
Modulus of Elasticity of steel Es= 200000 N/mm2
Width of Abutment, b= 16 m > 4*0.8 Classified as Wall as per Cl-16.3(1) of IRC:112
Thk. Of shaft, D= 0.800 m
Height, Lo= 3.000 m (From Bearing To Top of Abutent Cap)
Effecive Length, Le= 6.900 m (Refer IRC 112, Table11.1, Case-7)
Le/D= 8.625 <12, Short Wall/Column
factored Axial load, Pu= 330.635 T factored moment, Mu= 614.093 Tm
0.04*fck*Ag= 1536.000 T > Pu, Designed as Slab (IS:456-Cl-32.3.2)
Abutment is under the catogary of wall cl.-7.6.4 of IRC:112. Ultimate carrying capacity of section more than
that of vertical load on it, shall be designed as slab and detailing of reinforcement shall be per cl.-16.6 of
IRC:112
Designing as Cantilever slab
Dia. Of mai bar on earth side= 16 mm Dia. Of mai bar on river side= 16 mm
Dia. Horizontal reinforcement= 12 mm Cover to the main steel= 0.05 m
Effective cover for 16mm dia. Bar= 0.07 m Effective depth available, d= 0.730 m

2
Effective depth required def.=Sqrt(M/k*fck*b) def.= 0.309 Safe
Vertical reinforcement on earth face
x/d= 0.0687928 z= 0.709109 m
Min steel, Cl. 16.5.1.1 of IRC 112:2011 = 0.1300% of c/s area = 0.016640 Sqm
No. of Bar required=0.019908/0.000201 = 99 Nos.
No. of bar provided= 105 Nos. Safe
'maximum spacing, Cl.-16.6.1.1(4)= 250 mm c/c
Spacing provided= 152.69231 mm c/c Safe
Vertical reinforcement on river face
Provide minimum steel on river face as per cl.-16.6.1 0.13% = 0.01664 Sqm
Say 152.69231 mm c/c Safe
Horizontal Reinforcement
2
Distribution steel required = 20%/2 X (0.021062) = (Refer IRC:112-16.6.1) 0.002106 m
2
Spacing= 0.0001131 X3 X 1000/0.002106 = 161.11 mm c/c
Say 145 mm c/c Safe
151
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF SHAFT (HFL Condition)

Max. Horizontal Seismic Moment and corresponding Upward seismic force
Width of Abutment, b= 16 m > 4*0.8 Classified as Wall as per Cl-16.3(1) of IRC:112
Height, Lo= 3.000 m (From Bearing To Top of Abutent Cap)
Le/D= 8.625 <12, Short Wall/Column
IRC:112
Designing as Cantilever Slab
Dia. Of mai bar on earth side= 16 mm Dia. Of mai bar on river side= 16 mm

2
Vertical reinforcement on earth face
x/d= 0.0577104 z= 0.7124745 m
Spacing provided= 152.69231 mm c/c Safe
Vertical reinforcement on river face
Say 152.69231 mm c/c Safe
2
Distribution steel required = 20%/2 X (0.021062) = (Refer IRC:112-16.6) 0.002106 m
2
Spacing= 0.0001131 X3 X 1000/0.002106 = 161.11 mm c/c
Say 145 mm c/c Safe
152
LOAD AND MOMENT @ Bottom Of Pile Cap at centre

Horizontal Seismic coefficient =0.12 X 2.5 / 2.083)x 1.25 = 0.18
vertical seismic coefficient =0.67 x 0.144x 1.25 = 0.12
Refer IRC:6-2014 Cl.-219.8
a) Dead Loads and Moments of Superstructure
Service Condition
Dead Load reaction at abutment 150.00 t
Long. Moment = 150 X (0.02+-0.02)= 0 tm
Transverse moment = 150 X 0.034= 5.1 tm
Vertical load at abutment due to dead load =150 X 0.12= 18.00 t
Long. Moment =18 X (0.02+-0.02)= 0 tm
Transverse moment = 18 X 0.034= 0.612 tm
Horizontal load at abutment =150 X 0.18= 27 t
Long. Moment =27X (1.8+2.5+0.282+0.09+1.164)= 157.572 tm
b) dead load and moment of substructure

Service Condition
Approach Slab including MORT&H, RCC -Railing =0.5 X 3.6 X (1.5+16X0.3X2.5)= 24.3 t
Cantilever Return =2.2*0.5*1.5*0.3*2*2.5 2.475 t
Dirt Wall =0.3 X 1.787 X 16 X 2.5 21.444 t
Abutment cap =(0.5*1.22*16)*2.5 24.400 t
Longitudinal Reaction Block =4*(0.8*0.35*1.6)*2.5 2.560 t
Transverse Reaction Block =2*(0.8*0.8*0.8)*2.5 0.635 t
Pedastal =(0.282*0.66*0.8*5)*2.5 1.861 t
Abutment Wall =2.5 X 0.5X(0.8+ 0.8)X16 X 2.5 80.000 t
Pile Cap DRY Condition 5.1X1.8X16.3X(2.5) 374.085 t
Earth above Pile Cap DRY Condition
Behind Dirtwall =34.719 X 2.287 X 1.8 142.924 t
Behind Abutment Wall =34.719 X 2.5 X 1.8 156.236 t
Total Behind Abutmant= 299.160 t
=0 0.000 t
Infont of Abutment below scour lvl. -- 0.000 t
Earth above Pile Cap HFL condition
Behind Dirtwall Above HFL =34.719 X 2.287 X 1.8 142.924 t
Behind Abutment Wall Above HFL =34.719 X 0.16 X 1.8 9.999 t
Behind Abutment Wall Below HFL =34.719 X 2.34 X 0.8 64.994 t
Total Behind Abutmant= 217.917
=0 0.000 t
Infont of Abutment below scour lvl. -- 0.000 t
Abutment in HFL condition Width of abutment wall at HFL= 0.800
Abutment Wall above HFL =0.16 X0.5X (0.8+0.8) X 16 X 2.5 5.12 t
Abutment Wall below HFL =2.34X0.5 X (0.8+0.8) X 16 X (2.5-0.15) 70.387 t
Total 75.507 t
Pile Cap HFL Condition 5.1X1.8X16.3X(2.5-0.15) 351.640 t
Approach Slab including MORT&H, RCC -R 24.300 =-(0.4+0.2+.1--0.02) -0.7200 -17.496
Cantilever Return 2.475 -((2*0.6+1.6)*1.5 /((0.6+1.6)*3)+(2.13+0.4--0.02)) -3.1860 -7.885
Dirt Wall 21.444 =0.3*0.5+-0.02-0.4-0.2 -0.4700 -10.079
Abutment cap 24.400 =1.22*0.5+-0.02-0.4-0.2 -0.0100 -0.244
Longitudinal Reaction Block 2.560 =0.35*0.5+-0.02-0.4-0.2 -0.1450 -0.371
Transverse Reaction Block 0.635 =0.8*0.5+-0.02-0.4-0.2 0.0800 0.051
Pedastal 1.861 =0.28+0.04+0.3+-0.02-0.2-0.4 0.0000 0.000

Common Total 77.675 -36.024
153

Abutment Wall Dry Condition 80.000 -0.0200 -1.600
Return Wall Dry Condition 15.294 -(2.13X0.5+0.4--0.02) -1.4850 -22.712
Pile Cap Dry Condition 374.085 0.0000 0.000
Behind Abutment Wall 299.160 -(2.13X0.5+0.4--0.02) -1.4850 -444.252
0.000 -0.0200 0.000
Infont of Abutment below scour lvl. 0.000 =-2.17/2 -1.0850 0.000
Abutment Wall HFL Condition 75.507 -0.0200 -1.510
Return Wall HFL Condition 12.304 -(2.13X0.5+0.4--0.02) -1.4850 -18.271
Pile Cap HFL Condition 351.640 0.0000 0.000
0.000 -0.0200 0.000

Approach Slab including MORT&H, RCC -Railing =24.3 X 0.12= 2.916 t
Cantilever Return =2.475 X 0.12= 0.297 t
Dirt Wall =21.444 X 0.12= 2.573 t
Abutment cap =24.4 X 0.12= 2.928 t
Longitudinal Reaction Block =2.56 X 0.12= 0.307 t
Transverse Reaction Block =0.6345 X 0.12= 0.076 t
Pedastal =1.8612 X 0.12= 0.223 t
Abutment Wall Dry Condition =80 X 0.12= 9.600 t
Return Wall Dry Condition 1.835 t
Pile Cap Dry Condition =374.085 X 0.12= Fnd. Slab embeded beow MSL 0.000 t
Abutment Wall HFL Condition =75.507 X 0.12= 9.061 t
Return Wall HFL Condition 1.476 t
Pile Cap HFL Condition =351.6399 X 0.12= Fnd. Slab embeded beow MSL 0.000 t
Approach Slab including MORT&H, RCC -R 2.916 =-(0.4+0.2+.1--0.02) -0.7200 -2.100
Cantilever Return 0.297 -((2*0.6+1.6)*1.5 /((0.6+1.6)*3)+(2.13+0.4--0.02)) -3.1860 -0.946
Dirt Wall 2.573 =0.3*0.5+-0.02-0.4-0.2 -0.4700 -1.209
Abutment cap 2.928 =1.22*0.5+-0.02-0.4-0.2 -0.0100 -0.029
Longitudinal Reaction Block 0.307 =0.35*0.5+-0.02-0.4-0.2 -0.1450 -0.045
Transverse Reaction Block 0.076 =0.8*0.5+-0.02-0.4-0.2 0.0800 0.006
Pedastal 0.223 =0.28+0.04+0.3+-0.02-0.2-0.4 0.0000 0.000
Common Total 9.321 -4.323
Abutment Wall Dry Condition 9.600 -0.0200 -0.192
Return Wall Dry Condition 1.835 -(2.13X0.5+0.4--0.02) -1.4850 -2.725
Pile Cap Dry Condition 0.000 0.0000 0.000
0.000 0.00 -0.0200 0.000
Abutment Wall HFL Condition 9.061 -0.0200 -0.181
Return Wall HFL Condition 1.476 -(2.13X0.5+0.4--0.02) -1.4850 -2.193
Pile Cap HFL Condition 0.000 0.0000 0.000
0.000 0.00 -0.0200 0.000
154

Approach Slab including MORT&H, RCC -Railing =24.3 X 0.18= 4.374 t
Cantilever Return =2.475 X 0.18= 0.446
Dirt Wall =21.444 X 0.18= 3.860 t
Abutment cap =24.4 X 0.18= 4.392 t
Longitudinal Reaction Block =2.56 X 0.18= 0.461 t
Transverse Reaction Block =0.6345 X 0.18= 0.114 t
Pedastal =1.8612 X 0.18= 0.335 t
Abutment Wall Dry Condition =80 X 0.18= 14.400 t
Return Wall Dry Condition 2.753 t
Pile Cap Dry Condition =374.085 X 0.18= Fnd. Slab embeded beow MSL 0.000 t
Abutment Wall HFL Condition =75.507 X 0.18= 13.591 t
Return Wall HFL Condition 2.215 t
Pile Cap HFL Condition =351.6399 X 0.18= Fnd. Slab embeded beow MSL 0.000 t
Earth above Pile Cap DRY Condition
Behind Dirtwall =34.719 X 2.287 X 1.8 142.924 t
Behind Abutment Wall =34.719 X 2.5 X 1.8 156.236 t
Total Behind Abutmant= 299.160 t
Earth above Pile Cap HFL condition
Behind Dirtwall Above HFL =34.719 X 2.287 X 1.8 142.92 t
Behind Abutment Wall Above HFL =34.719 X 0.16 X 1.8 10.00 t
Behind Abutment Wall Below HFL =34.719 X 2.34 X 0.8 64.99 t
Total Behind Abutmant= 217.917
Approach Slab including MORT&H, RCC -R 4.374 =1.8+4.787 + 0.86 X 0.5 7.017 30.692
Cantilever Return 0.446 =1.8+4.787-(a2+b2+ab)/(12a+6b) 6.356 2.832
Dirt Wall 3.860 =1.8+2.5 + 1.787 X 0.5 5.1935 20.046
Abutment cap 4.392 =1.8+2.5 - 0.25 4.05 17.788
Longitudinal Reaction Block 0.461 =1.8+2.5+0.5+0.5*1.6 5.60 2.580
Transverse Reaction Block 0.114 =1.8+2.5+0.5+0.5*0.8 5.20 0.594
Pedastal 0.335 =1.8+2.5+0.5+0.5*0.282 4.94 1.655
Abutment Wall Dry Condition 14.400 =0.5 X 2.5+1.8 3.05 43.920
Return Wall Dry Condition 2.753 =0.5 X 4.787 2.39 6.589
Pile Cap Dry Condition 0.000 =0.5 X 1.8 0.90 0.000
Abutment Wall HFL Condition 13.591 =0.5 X 2.5+1.8 3.05 41.453
Return Wall HFL Condition 2.215 =0.5 X 4.787 2.39 5.301
Pile Cap HFL Condition 0.000 =0.5 X 1.8 0.90 0.000
Earth above Pile Cap Dry Condition
Behind Dirtwall 0.000 =0.5*2.287+2.5+1.8 5.44 0.000
Behind Abutment Wall 0.000 = 0.5X 2.5+1.8 3.05 0.000
Earth above Pile Cap HFL Condition
Behind Dirtwall Above HFL 0.000 =0.5*2.287+2.5+1.8 5.44 0.000
Behind Abutment Wall Above HFL 0.000 =0.5*0.16+2.34+1.8 4.22 0.000
Behind Abutment Wall Below HFL 0.000 =0.5*2.34+1.8 2.97 0.000
Where a=0.6 & b=1.6
c) Live Load and moment
Sl. No. Particulars of load Service Condition Transverse Moment

Reaction on Abutment Maximum Minimum Eccentricity Max Min
1 70R Track Load 59.975 10.025
2 70 R Wheeled 65.4 34.6
3 Class A (1 - Lanes) 30.701 12.499
4 Class A ( 3-Lane ) in T 92.103 37.497
155
Service Condition
Maximum Reaction Rb (T)= 96.101 t
Min. Reaction 47.099 t
Maximum longitudinal moment about the base =96.101 X 0 = 0.00 t
Min Longitudinal moment about base =47.099 X 0 = 0.00 t
Maximum Reaction =96.101 X 0.12 X 0.2 = 2.306 t
Minimum Reaction =47.099 X 0.12 X 0.2 = 1.130 t
Maximum longitudinal moment about the base =2.307 X 0 = 0.000 tm
Minimum longitudinal moment about base =1.131 X 0 = 0.000 tm
Maximum transverse moment =2.307 X 2.159 X 0.2 = 0.996 tm
Minimum Transverse moment =1.131 X 2.159 X 0.2 = 0.488 tm

Lever arm value, =1.8+4.787 + 1.2 = 7.787 m
d) Footpath Live Load

Intensity of live load =500 - ((40 X 14 - 300)/9) = 471.11 kg/m2
Maximum Reaction on Abutment =2X (471.112 X 14.56 X 1.5)/1000X 2 = 10.29 t
Minimum Reaction on abutment =(2-1)X(471.112X 14.56X1.5)/1000X 2 = 5.15 t
Maximum Longitudinal moment due to footway live load = 10.289 X 0 = 0.00 tm
Minimum Longitudinal Moment due to footway live load = 5.145 X 0 = 0.00 tm
e) Horizontal Forces due to Braking

70R - Track = 14 t
Normal Case
Change in length due to Temparature and Shrinkage ltc= =(0.0000117*34+0.0002)x14.56/2 = 0.0040 m
Fh/2+Vr*ltc= 28.64*0.5+940*0.004 = 18.080 t
F F*Cos(0) F*Sin(0)
Max Long. horizontal Force on abutment 18.080 18.08 0 t
Minimum Longitudinal force on abutment 18.080 18.08 0 t
M M*Cos(0) M*Sin(0)
Max. Long. moment at base of abutment= 18.08 X (1.8+3 + 0.282 + 0.09) = 93.510 93.51 0 tm
Min. Long. moment at base of abutment= 18.08 X (1.8+3 + 0.282 + 0.09) = 93.510 93.51 0 tm
156
Seismic Case
Change in length due to Temparature and Shrinkage ltc= =(0.0000117*34+0.0002)x14.56/2 0.0040
Fh/2+Vr*ltc= 5.728*0.5+940*0.004 6.624
F F*Cos(0) F*Sin(0)
Max Longitudinal horizontal Force on abutment= 6.624 6.624 0t
Minimum Longitudinal force on abutment= 6.624 6.624 0t
M M*Cos(0) M*Sin(0)
Max. Long. moment at base of abutment= 6.624 X (1.8+3 + 0.282 + 0.09)= 34.259 34.259 0 tm
Min. Long. moment at base of abutment= 6.624 X (1.8+3 + 0.282 + 0.09)= 34.259 34.259 0 tm
Max. Vertical Reaction on Abutment due to braking =6.624 X 0.5 X(1.2+ 0.065 + 1.416)/14= 0.634 t
Earth presure For Abutment wall

Earth presuure coefficient Item Angle in Degree Angle in Radian
Angle which earth face of the wall makes with vertical α= 90 1.5708
Angle of internal friction of soil φ= 30 0.5236
Angle of friction between wall and the earth fill δ= 20 0.34907
Angle beta β= 0 0
sin2 (α + φ)
Ka
sin (α). sin (α-δ). [1 + {sin (φ+δ). sin(φ-β) / sin (α-δ). sin (α+β)} 1/2 ]2
0.75
Ka
2.523
Ka= 0.297
Horizontal component Kah= 0.297*1*COS(90-90+20)= 0.279
Vertical component Kav= 0.297*1*SIN(90-90+20)= 0.102
b) Loads and Moments due to earth pressure :

i) Service Condition (Dry/LWL Case):
Earth Pressure -
F1 (i) Live Load Surcharge (f1)=1.2 X 1.8 X 0.279= 0.603 t/m2
2.287 (ii) Earth pressure due to fill (f2)=1.8 X 0.279 X 2.287= 1.149 t/m2
F2
5.179 (iv) Earth pressure due to fill (f4)=1.8 X 0.279 X 2.5= 1.256 t/m2
(v) Earth pressure due to fill (f5)=1.751+1.256 3.007 t/m2
F3 2.500 (vi) Earth pressure due to fill (f6)=1.8 X 0.279 X 0.392= 0.197 t/m2
F4 Leverarm calculation :
Lever arm 1= 5.179-0.5*2.287 Lever arm 4= 5.179-2.287-0.58*2.5
F5 Lever arm 2= 5.179-0.58*2.287 Lever arm 5= 5.179-2.287-2.5-0.5*0.392
F6 0.392m Lever arm 3= 5.179-2.287-0.5*2.5 Lever arm 6= 5.179-2.287-2.5-0.58*0.392

F1 =0.603 X 2.287 X (16-0.6) 21.238 4.035 85.693
F2 =0.5 X 1.149 X 2.287 X (16-0.6) 20.234 3.853 77.961
F3 =1.751 X 2.5 X (16-0.6) 67.414 1.642 110.694
F4 =0.5 X 1.256 X 2.5 X (16-0.6) 24.178 1.442 34.865
F5 =3.007 X 0.392 X 16.3 19.214 0.196 3.766
F6 =0.5 X 0.197 X 0.392 X 16.3 0.629 0.165 0.104
Total 152.91 313.08
157
ii) Service Condition (HFL Case):

Earth Pressure -
F1 (i) Live Load Surcharge (p1)=1.2 X 1.8 X 0.279= 0.603 t/m2
F2 2.287 (ii) Earth pressure due to fill (p2)=1.8 X 0.279 X 2.287= 1.149 t/m2
(iii) Earth pressure due to fill (p3)=0.603+1.149 1.752 t/m3
5.179 (iv) Earth pressure due to fill (p4)=1.8 X 0.279 X 0.16= 0.08 t/m3
F3 0.160 (v) Earth pressure due to fill (p5)=1.752+0.08 1.832 t/m3
F4 (vi) Earth pressure due to fill (p6)=1 X 0.279 X 2.34= 0.653 t/m3
(vii) Earth pressure due to fill (p7)=1.832+0.653 2.485 t/m3
2.340 (viii) Earth pressure due to fill (p8)=1 X 0.279 X 0.392= 0.109 t/m3
F5 Refer IRC, Cl.-710.4.7
F6
Lever arm 1= 0.5 X 2.287+0.16+2.34+0.392 Lever arm 5= 0.5 X 2.34+0.392
F7
F8 0.392 Lever arm 2= 0.42 X 2.287+0.16+2.34+0.392 Lever arm 6= 0.33 X 2.34+0.392

F1 =0.603 X 2.287 X (16-0.6) 21.238 4.035 85.695
F2 =0.5 X 1.149 X 2.287 X (16-0.6) 20.234 3.853 77.962
F3 =1.752 X 0.16 X (16-0.6) 4.317 2.812 12.139
F4 =0.5 X 0.08 X 0.16 X (16-0.6) 0.099 2.799 0.277
F5 =1.832 X 2.34 X (16-0.6) 66.018 1.562 103.120
F6 =0.5 X 0.653 X 2.34 X (16-0.6) 11.766 1.188 13.978
F7 =2.485 X 0.392 X 16.3 15.878 0.196 3.112
F8 =0.5 X 0.109 X 0.392 X 16.3 0.348 0.133 0.046
Total 139.90 296.33

Seismic Condition : Refer IRC:6-2014 Cl.-219.5.4
Additional loads and moments due to Seismic (Refer IS 1893, 1984 clause - 8.11)
(1+ α v ) cos2 (φ−λ−α) 1 '2
Ca cos λ cos2 α cos(δ+α+λ) x sin(φ+δ) sin(φ−β−λ)
1+ cos(α−β) cos(δ+α+λ)
Where
αh= Horizontal Seismic Coefficient = 0.1800
αv= Vertical Seismic Coefficient = 0.0900
φ= Angle of internal friction of soil = 0.5236
-
λ= tan 1(α h/(1+ α v ))= = 0.1937
tan-1(α h/(1- α v ))= = 0.1624
α= Angle which earth face of wall make with vertical = 0.0000
δ= Angle of friction of wall and earth fill = 0.3491
β= = 0.0000
0.975612587 1 '2
Ca=
0.840269799
x 0.248159144
1+ 0.856283379
Or, Ca= 0.49
Horizontal component = Cah= 0.490 *1*COS(90-90+20) = 0.460
Vertical component = Cav 0.490 *1*SIN(90-90+20) = 0.168
Dynamic Increament: Cah-Kah= 0.181 = 0.180
158
iii) Seismic Condition (Dry/LWL Case)

Earth Pressure -
(i) Live Load Surcharge (p1)=1.2 X 1.8 X 0.18= 0.389 t/m2
Fs1
2.287m (ii) Earth pressure due to fill (f2)=1.8 X 0.18 X 2.287= 0.741 t/m2
Fs2
4.787 (iv) Earth pressure due to fill (f4)=1.8 X 0.18 X 2.5= 0.81 t/m2
(v) Earth pressure due to fill (f5)=1.8 X 0.18 X (5.179+1.2)= 2.067 t/m2
Fs3 2.500m (vi) Earth pressure due to fill (f6)=(1.8-1) X 0.18 X 0.392= 0.127 t/m2
Fs4 Leverarm calculation :
Lever arm 1= 0.66 X 2.287+2.5+1.8 Lever arm 4= 0.5 X 2.5+1.8
Fs5 1.8 Lever arm 2= 0.5 X 2.287+2.5+1.8 Lever arm 5= 0.66X 1.8
Fs6

F1 =0.389 X 2.287 X (16-0.6) 13.701 5.809 79.589
F2 =0.5 X 0.741 X 2.287 X (16-0.6) 13.049 5.444 71.039
F3 =1.13 X 2.5 X (16-0.6) 43.505 3.450 150.092
F4 =0.5 X 0.81 X 2.5 X (16-0.6) 15.593 3.050 47.559
F5 =2.067 X 1.8 X 16.3 60.64578 1.188 72.047
F6 =0.5 X 0.127 X 1.8 X 16.3 1.86309 0.900 1.677
Total Seismic EP considered 148.36 422.003
iv) Seismic Condition (HFL Case)

Earth Pressure -
Fs1 (i) Live Load Surcharge (ps1)=1.2 X 1.8 X 0.18= 0.389 t/m2
Fs2 2.287 (ii) Earth pressure due to fill (ps2)=1.8 X 0.18 X 2.287= 0.741 t/m2
(iii) Earth pressure due to fill (ps3)=1.8 X 0.18 X (2.287+1.2)= 1.130 t/m3
2.447 (iv) Earth pressure due to fill (ps4)=1.8 X 0.18 X 0.16= 0.052 t/m3
Fs3
0.16 4.787 (v) Earth pressure due to fill (ps5)=1.8 X 0.18 X (5.179+1.2)= 2.067 t/m3
Fs4
(vi) Earth pressure due to fill (ps6)=(1.8-1) X 0.18 X 2.34= 0.337 t/m3
(vii) Earth pressure due to fill (pS7)=2.067+(1.8-1) X 0.18 X 0.392= 2.326 t/m3
Fs5 2.34 (viii) Earth pressure due to fill (p8)=(1.8-1) X 0 X 1.8= 0.2592 t/m3
Fs6
Fs7 1.800 Leverarm calculation :
Fs8 Lever arm 1= 0.66 X 2.287+0.16+2.34 Lever arm 5= 0.66 X 2.34
Fs1 =0.389 X 2.287 X (16-0.6) 13.701 5.809 79.595
Fs2 =0.5 X 0.741 X 2.287 X (16-0.6) 13.049 5.444 71.032
Fs3 =1.13 X 0.16 X (16-0.6) 2.784 4.246 11.821
Fs4 =0.5 X 0.052 X 0.16 X (16-0.6) 1.392 4.220 5.875
Fs5 =2.067 X 2.34 X (16-0.6) 74.486 3.344 249.112
Fs6 =0.5 X 0.337 X 2.34 X (16-0.6) 6.072 2.970 18.034
Fs7 =2.3262 X 0.392 X 16.3 68.251 1.188 81.082
Fs8 =0.5 X 0.2592 X 0.392 X 16.3 3.802 0.900 3.422
Total Seismic EP considered 183.54 519.974
159
SUMMARY OF FORCES AND MOMENT

Partial Safety Vertical Horizontal Transverse Longitudinal Transverse
Factor Load (T) Load (HL) Load (HT) Moment (TM) Moment
DL+SIDL Superstructure 1.35 202.50 0 6.885
DL Substructure 1.35 1142.389 -681.195
Live Loads
CWLL Max 1.5 144.1515 0.00 311.22
Min 70.6485 0.00 152.53
FPLL Max 1.5 15.43 0.00 0.00
Min 7.72 0.00 51.71
Min. -4.112 27.120 0.000 140.265 0.000
Earth Pressure 1.5 229.36 313.082
Wind ForcSpan Intact 1.5 0.000 5.968 0.000 39.861
Span Dislodged 0.000 0.727 0.000 2.873
Max. 1536.18 256.48 0.00 -227.30 319.05
Min. 1446.73 256.48 0.00 -227.30 212.06
Max. 1536.18 256.48 5.97 -227.30 358.91
Min. 1446.73 256.48 5.97 -227.30 251.92
Span Dislodged Total 1142.389 229.359 0.000 -368.113 0.000
--------------- ** **
--------------- ** **
--------------- ** **
--------------- ** **
DL+SIDL Superstructure 1.35 202.50 0 6.885
DL Substructure 1.35 992.308 -512.208 0
Live Loads
CWLL Max 1.5 144.1515 0.00 311.22
Min 70.6485 0.00 152.53
FPLL Max 1.5 15.43 0.00 0.00
Min 7.72 0.00 51.71
Min. -4.112 27.120 0.000 140.265 0.000
Earth Pressure 1.5 209.85 0 444.495 0
Wind Forces Span Intact 1.5 0.000 4.914 0.000 36.586
Span Dislodged 0.000 0.727 0.000 3.214
-- 1.5 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Max. 1386.095 236.967 0.000 73.104 319.046
Min. 1296.652 236.967 0.000 73.104 212.060
Max. 1386.09 236.97 4.91 73.10 355.63
Min. 1296.65 236.97 4.91 73.10 248.65
Around Nor Applicable Min. -- -- -- -- --
Around windApplicable Min. -- -- -- -- --
--------------- ** **
--------------- ** **
--------------- ** **
--------------- ** **
160
c) Seismic Combination- Seismic in longitudinal Direction (Dry/LWL Case)

0.3 r3 5.968 0.000 0.184
Seismic
icl. WC
1.0 r1 29.838 169.026
0.3 r2 8.951 50.708
Substruct 0.3 r3 16.997 -18.165
Seismic
ure 1.0 r1 31.134 126.697

0.3 r2 9.340 38.009
Live Loads 20%
CWLL Max Normal 1 19.220 0.000 41.496
0.3 r3 0.692 0.000 0.299
Seismic
CWLL
max
1.0 r1 0.000 0.000

0.3 r2 1.038 8.082
Min Normal 9.420 0.000 20.337
0.3 r3 0.339 0.000 0.146
Seismic
CWLL
min
1.0 r1 0.000 0.000

0.3 r2 0.509 3.961
FPLL Max 1 10.289 0.000 0.000
Min 5.145 0.000 34.472
Breaking & Max 1 0.634 6.624 0.000 34.259 0.000
Bearing Min -0.634 6.624 0.000 34.259 0.000
Seismic 148.357 422.003
Max. 1065.779 388.189 0.000 639.427 47.615
Downward Seismic Effect Total Re. Hor. Load= 388.189 Re. Mom. 641.197
Min. 1049.214 387.660 0.000 635.306 60.775
Max. 986.935 388.189 0.000 675.126 45.578
Upward Seismic Effect Total Re. Hor. Load= 388.189 Re. Mom. 676.663
Min. 971.076 387.660 0.000 671.005 59.043
--------------- ** **
--------------- ** **
--------------- ** **
--------------- ** **
161
d) Seismic Combination - Seismic in Transverse Direction (Dry/LWL Case)

0.3 r3 5.968 0.000 0.184
Seismic
icl. WC
1.0 r2 29.838 169.026
0.3 r1 8.951 50.708
Substruct 0.3 r3 16.997 -18.165
Seismic
ure 1.0 r2 31.134 126.697

0.3 r1 9.340 38.009
Live Loads 20%
CWLL Max Normal 1 19.220 0.000 41.496
0.3 r3 0.692 0.000 0.299
Seismic
CWLL
max
1.0 r2 3.460 26.940

0.3 r1 0.000 0.000
Min Normal 9.420 0.000 20.337
0.3 r3 0.339 0.000 0.146
Seismic
CWLL
min
1.0 r2 1.696 13.203

0.3 r1 0.000 0.000
FPLL Max 1 10.289 0.000 0.000
Min 5.145 0.000 34.472
Breaking & Max 1 0.634 6.624 0.000 34.259 0.000
Bearing Min -0.634 6.624 0.000 34.259 0.000
Seismic 0.000 0.000
Max. 1065.779 159.530 82.724 -175.097 458.994
Min. 1049.214 159.530 80.960 -175.097 458.418
Max. 986.935 159.530 82.724 -139.398 456.958
Min. 971.076 159.530 80.960 -139.398 456.685
--------------- ** **
--------------- ** **
--------------- ** **
--------------- ** **
162
e) Seismic Combination - Seismic in longitudinal Direction(HFL Case)

0.3 r3 5.968 0.000 0.184
Seismic
icl. WC
1.0 r1 29.838 169.026
0.3 r2 8.951 50.708
Substruct 0.3 r3 13.803 -18.165
Seismic
ure 1.0 r1 29.787 126.697

0.3 r2 8.936 38.009
Live Loads 20%
CWLL Max Normal 1 19.220 0.000 41.496
0.3 r3 0.692 0.000 0.299
Seismic
CWLL
max
1.0 r1 0.000 0.000

0.3 r2 1.038 8.082
Min Normal 9.420 0.000 20.337
0.3 r3 0.339 0.000 0.146
Seismic
CWLL
min
1.0 r1 0.000 0.000

0.3 r2 0.509 3.961
FPLL Max 1 10.289 0.000 0.000
Min 5.145 0.000 34.472
Breaking & Max 1 0.634 6.624 0.000 34.259 0.000
Bearing Min -0.634 6.624 0.000 34.259 0.000
Earth Pressure Normal 1 139.898 0.000 296.330 0.000
Seismic 183.538 519.974
-- 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Max. 951.414 408.611 0.000 845.821 47.615
Min. 934.849 408.082 0.000 841.700 60.775
Max. 878.958 408.611 0.000 881.521 45.578
Min. 863.099 408.082 0.000 877.400 59.043
Around Nor Applicable Min. -- Re. Hor. Load= -- -- --
Around windApplicable Min. -- Re. Hor. Load= -- -- --
--------------- ** **
--------------- ** **
--------------- ** **
--------------- ** **
163
f) Seismic Combination - Seismic in Transverse Direction (HFL Case)

0.3 r3 5.968 0.000 0.184
Seismic
icl. WC
1.0 r2 29.838 169.026
0.3 r1 8.951 50.708
Substruct 0.3 r3 13.803 -18.165
Seismic
ure 1.0 r2 29.787 122.942

0.3 r1 8.936 36.883
Live Loads 20%
CWLL Max Normal 1 19.220 0.000 41.496
0.3 r3 0.692 0.000 0.299
Seismic
CWLL
max
1.0 r2 3.460 26.940

0.3 r1 0.000 0.000
Min Normal 9.420 0.000 20.337
0.3 r3 0.339 0.000 0.146
Seismic
CWLL
min
1.0 r2 1.696 13.203

0.3 r1 0.000 0.000
FPLL Max 1 10.289 0.000 0.000
Min 5.145 0.000 34.472
Breaking & Max 1 0.634 6.624 0.000 34.259 0.000
Bearing Min -0.634 6.624 0.000 34.259 0.000
Earth Pressure Normal 1 139.898 0.000 296.330 0.000
Seismic 0.000 0.000
-- 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Max. 951.414 146.522 80.972 -66.674 454.113
Min. 934.849 146.522 79.208 -66.674 453.536
Max. 878.958 146.522 80.972 -30.974 452.076
Min. 863.099 146.522 79.208 -30.974 451.804
Around Nor Applicable Min. -- Re. Hor. Load= -- -- --
Around windApplicable Min. -- Re. Hor. Load= -- -- --
--------------- ** **
--------------- ** **
--------------- ** **
--------------- ** **
164
SUMMARY OF FORCES AND MOMENT (With partial safety factor of 1.0)

DL+SIDL Superstructure 1 150.00 0 5.1
DL Substructure 1 846.214 -504.589
Live Loads
CWLL Max 1 96.101 0.00 207.48
Min 47.099 0.00 101.69
FPLL Max 1 10.29 0.00 0.00
Min 5.15 0.00 34.47
Breaking & Bearing Max. 1 2.741 18.080 0.000 93.510 0.000
Min. -2.741 18.080 0.000 93.510 0.000
Earth Pressure 1 152.91 313.082
Wind ForcSpan Intact 1 0.000 3.979 0.000 26.574
Span Dislodged 0.000 0.485 0.000 1.916
Max. 1121.11 170.99 0.00 -97.68 213.12
Min. 1061.48 170.99 0.00 -97.68 141.79
Max. 1121.11 170.99 3.98 -97.68 239.69
Min. 1061.48 170.99 3.98 -97.68 168.37
--------------- ** **
--------------- ** **
--------------- ** **
--------------- ** **
DL+SIDL Superstructure 1 150.00 0 5.1
DL Substructure 1 735.043 -379.413 0
Live Loads
CWLL Max 1 96.101 0.00 207.48
Min 47.099 0.00 101.69
FPLL Max 1 10.29 0.00 0.00
Min 5.15 0.00 34.47
Breaking & Bearing Max. 1 2.741 18.080 0.000 93.510 0.000
Min. -2.741 18.080 0.000 93.510 0.000
Earth Pressure 1 139.90 0 296.330 0
Wind Forces Span Intact 1 0.000 3.276 0.000 24.391
Span Dislodged 0.000 0.485 0.000 2.142
-- 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Max. 1009.940 157.978 0.000 10.742 213.118
Min. 950.311 157.978 0.000 10.742 141.794
Max. 1009.94 157.98 3.28 10.74 237.51
Min. 950.31 157.98 3.28 10.74 166.18
Around Nor Applicable Min. -- -- -- -- --
Around windApplicable Min. -- -- -- -- --
--------------- ** **
--------------- ** **
--------------- ** **
--------------- ** **
165
Lateral Capacity of pile-I.S. 2911 Part-1/Section-2-1979 (Reaffirmed 2002)

The Pile is designed as a circular column section subject to vertical load and moment. The horizontal force at the
bottom of the pile cap is distributed equally in all the piles. The pile section at the depth of fixity has been checked as
the design moment in pile are maximum at this section. The pile shall be designed under fixed head condition
DATA ( Pile )
Type of Pile Head(Free-R, Fixed-X) R/X X
Horizontal Subgrade Reaction K2= 97.73 Kg/cm2
Length of Pile above Ground Level L2 0 cm
Depth of pile below GL L= 2247.6 cm
Diameter of Pile under Consideration Dia.= 120 cm
Grade of Concrete used for pile M= 35 Mpa
Thickness of pile Cap Tpc= 180 cm
Depth of Pile Cap (Below GL) d= -2.4 cm
Length of pile under scour L1= 0.0 cm
Allowable Deflection of pile head Y= 1.2 cm
Calculation
Moment of Inertia of pile I= 10178760 cm4
Youngs Modulus of Pile Material E= 295804 Kg/cm2
Effective length of pile below scour Le= 2070.000 cm
Calcuation of Depth of Fixity (Lf) R 418.96 cm
4R 1675.8 cm
SinceLe=2070>4R=1675.8, Take value of Lf/R corresponding to L1/R from Fig 2 of IS2911-Par1/Sec2
L1/R 0
Lf/R 2.2
Depth of fixity "Lf" Lf= 921.70 Ref. graph
Start of Rock below maximum scour= Lf= NA Ref. bore log
Equivalent Cantilever Length (L1+min(Lf))= 921.70 9.2170 m
Lateral capacity Q= 12EIy/(L1+Lf)^3= 55.373 T
Deflection at scour/bed level Q(L1+Lf)^3/12EI= 1.2 cm
Fixed End Moment, Q(L1+Lf)/2 Mf= 255.19 Tm
Reduction factor for Max. Mom. m= 0.69
Actual Maximum Moment allowed M=m*Mf 176.00 Tm
2.5
Ground Level
Determination of Depth of Fixity
2.3 d=-2.4cm
Lf/R or Lf/T and "m"
2.1 and reduction coeff. (Fixed Head Pile for sand

1.9 and Normaly loaded Clay)
1.7
1.5 Tpc=180cm
1.3
1.1
0.9
0.7
L2+L1=0m
0.5 Scour Level
0 1 2 3 4 5
L1/R or L1/T L=2247.6
Le

Fixity For sand "m"
For clay "m" 1.2cm
L2+L1=0 L2+L1=0
1.2cm<1.2cm
Lf=9.217
Le=20.7 RL-85.707 Fixing Level of pile
Founding Level of Pile RL-74.224

Note:- Above deflection is for Horizontal force of 55.373 T at Tip of pile
166
Input data for Pile Capacity PILE CAP

Stem diameter of pile = 1.200 m
Location of cutoff level below G.L = 1.776 m Layer-1
Location of Scour Lvel below G.L = 0.368 m
Layer-……
PILE
Depth of Pile below G.L. = 22.476 m
Length of pile below Scour Level/Pile Cap = 20.700 m Fig is indicative only
Layer-……
Factor of safety for evaluating pile capacity = 2.500 in soil
Layer at Which pile rest = 10 TH Layer- 10
Layer at Which pile rest (Soil / Rock) = soil
RL of the Layers = 93.700 90.700 87.700 84.700 81.700 80.700 78.700 75.700 74.700 72.700
Depth of layers from G.L./Bed = 3.000 6.000 9.000 12.000 15.000 16.000 18.000 21.000 22.000 24.000
Depth from Scour/Cutoff Level Layer - 1 Layer - 2 Layer - 3 Layer - 4 Layer - 5 Layer - 6 Layer - 7 Layer - 8 Layer - 9 Layer-10
Effective Depth of layer below scour h 1.224 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 1.000 2.000 3.000 1.000 0.476
Bulk Density of soil in g/cm3 or t/m3 γ 1.952 1.984 2.012 2.020 2.032 2.048 2.038 2.033 2.042 2.048
Effective Unit weight of soil (Yeff.) Yeff. 0.952 0.984 1.012 1.02 1.032 1.048 1.038 1.033 1.042 1.048
For Cohesionless soils
Bearing capacity factor (Ny) 0.393 0.449 0.449 0.637 0.707 0.781 1.224 1.33 1.689 1.689
Bearing capacity factor (Nq) 1.499 1.568 1.568 1.796 1.879 1.966 2.471 2.588 2.974 2.974
Coeff. Of earth pressure K 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5
Angle of wall friction between soil & pile δ 4.5 5 5 6.5 7 7.5 10 10.5 12 12
Angle of internal friction φ 4.5 5.0 5.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 10.0 10.5 12.0 12.0
For Cohesive soils
Bearing capacity factor Nc 6.34 6.49 6.49 6.99 7.16 7.34 8.34 8.57 9.29 9.29
Average Cohesion at pile tip Cp 3.8 3.9 3.95 4.5 4.8 4.75 5.2 5 5.5 6.5
Avg. Cohesion throughout length of pile C 3.80 3.90 3.95 4.50 4.80 4.75 5.20 5.00 5.50 6.50
Reduction factor α 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Calculation
Surface area of pile stem Asi 4.614 11.310 11.310 11.310 11.310 3.770 7.540 11.310 3.770 1.794
Effective overburden pressure PDi 0.582624 2.641 5.635 8.683 11.761 13.833 15.395 17.983 20.053 20.824
K.PDi.tan(δ).Asi = 0.317 3.920 8.364 16.784 24.499 10.299 30.701 56.541 24.104 11.914
α.C.ASi = 8.767 22.054 22.337 25.447 27.143 8.954 19.604 28.274 10.367 5.832
KPDi tand Asi + α C As = 9.085 25.974 30.701 42.230 51.642 19.252 50.305 84.816 34.471 17.746
2
Cross sectional area of pile tip Ap 1.131 m
Eff. Overburden pressure=20.823672+0.5*1.048*0.476 PD 21.073 t/m2
End Bearing resistance {Ref. Appendix B of IS:2911 (Part I/Sec2) - 1979} Frictional resistance {Ref. Appendix B of IS:2911(Part I/Sec 2) - 1979}
Qu1 ={Ap(1/2* DYNY + PD Nq)} + {Ap Nc Cp} Qu2 = Sum1n ( KPDi tand Asi ) + ( a C As )
Point resistance = 140.35557 Frictional Resistance = 366.2213 t
Total Ultimate resistence, Qu=(Qu1+Qu2) = 506.57687 t (Frictional Resistance due to soil layer above weathered rock is ignored)
Safe load on pile (Normal Case) = 203 t Uplift Load Capacity of Pile (Normal Case)= 146
167
Forces on Pile ( Dry/LWL Condition) - For design of pile only

Diameter of pile = 1.2 m
Depth of pile below bed level = 22.476 m
4 5
Depth of fixity = 9.217 m
No. of pile in Transverse direction = 4 Nos.
No. of pile in longitudinal direction = 2 Nos.
Additional Pile at centre = 0 Nos.
3 6 Spacing of pile in Transverse direction = 4.933 m
Spacing of pile in Longitudinal direction = 3.6 m
2 7
Area of pile cap = 83.13 m2

Depth of pile cap = 1.80 m
1 8
Density of concrete = 2.5 t/m3
0.5 243.345 ILL= 243.345 m4
Note : Sl. No. of pile has no connection with no. of Pile. 0.5 25.92 ITT= 25.92 m4
Summary of Load and Moment on Pile in Different Cases of Loading

Basic Combination (Dry/LWL Case) :
Load and Moment on Group of Pile Vertical Self Wt. Load on individual Pile due to axial load and moment Load and Moment on each Pile
Vert. Lat. Long. Trans. Load Upto Pile-1 Pile-3 Pile-4 Pile-5 Pile-6 Pile-8 Pile-9 Pile-11 Pile-12 Pile-13 Pile-14 Pile-16 Max Min Lat. Long.
Load Load Moment Moment on Each Fixity Load Load Load Mom.
1536.176 256.479 -227.30 319.046 192.022 15.636 213.74 226.676 233.14 201.575 195.108 182.172 233.144 182.172 32.060 101.946
Service Condition
1446.733 256.479 -227.30 212.060 180.842 15.636 205.81 214.412 218.71 187.142 182.843 174.245 218.711 182.843 32.060 101.946
One Span Dislodged 1142.389 229.359 -368.11 0.000 142.799 15.636 184.00 183.998 184.00 132.871 132.871 132.871 183.998 132.871 28.670 91.166
1536.176 256.549 -227.30 358.907 192.022 15.636 212.53 227.080 234.36 202.787 195.512 180.960 234.356 195.512 32.069 101.974
Wind-Span Intact
1446.733 256.549 -227.30 251.921 180.842 15.636 204.60 214.816 219.92 188.354 183.247 173.033 219.923 183.247 32.069 101.974
Maximum and MinimumValue= 234.356 132.871 32.069 101.974
Seismic Combination- Seismic in longitudinal Direction (Dry/LWL Case)

1065.779 388.189 639.43 47.615 133.222 15.636 103.01 104.937 105.90 194.711 193.746 191.815 194.711 103.006 48.524 154.299
Downward Seismic Effect
1049.214 388.189 635.31 60.775 131.152 15.636 100.82 103.286 104.52 192.754 191.522 189.058 192.754 100.822 48.524 154.299
986.935 388.189 675.13 45.578 123.367 15.636 90.73 92.581 93.51 187.273 186.349 184.501 187.273 90.733 48.524 154.299
Upward Seismic Effect
971.076 388.189 671.01 59.043 121.384 15.636 88.63 91.022 92.22 185.414 184.217 181.823 185.414 88.628 48.524 154.299
Seismic Combination - Seismic in Transverse Direction (Dry/LWL Case)

1065.779 179.703 -175.10 458.99 133.222 15.636 147.06 165.670 174.98 150.656 141.351 122.742 174.975 122.742 22.463 71.429
1049.214 179.703 -175.10 458.42 131.152 15.636 145.01 163.594 172.89 148.568 139.275 120.689 172.887 139.275 22.463 71.429
986.935 179.703 -139.40 456.96 123.367 15.636 134.79 153.315 162.58 143.218 133.954 115.428 162.578 133.954 22.463 71.429
971.076 179.703 -139.40 456.69 121.384 15.636 132.81 151.330 160.59 141.227 131.969 113.454 160.588 131.969 22.463 71.429
168
Forces on Pile ( Dry/LWL Condition) - For checking pile capacity

4 5
Vertical capacity of pile = 203 T
Uplift Capacity of Pile = -146.00
Lateral capacity of pile = 55.373 T
2 7 Maximum moment allowed per pile = 176.00 Tm
Vertical capacity of pile in seismic case = 253.75 T
Lateral capacity of pile in seismic case = 69.22
1 8
0.5 243.345 ILL= 243.345 m4

Basic Combination (Dry/LWL Case) :
1121.111 170.986 -97.68 213.118 140.139 15.636 156.08 164.719 169.04 155.472 151.152 142.511 169.039 142.511 21.373 67.964
Service Condition
1061.482 170.986 -97.68 141.794 132.685 15.636 150.79 156.542 159.42 145.850 142.975 137.227 159.417 142.975 21.373 67.964
1121.111 171.033 -97.68 239.692 140.139 15.636 155.27 164.988 169.85 156.280 151.421 141.703 169.847 151.421 21.379 67.983
Wind-Span Intact
1061.482 171.033 -97.68 168.368 132.685 15.636 149.99 156.812 160.23 146.658 143.245 136.418 160.225 143.245 21.379 67.983
Safe Safe Safe Safe
Seismic Combination- Seismic in longitudinal Direction (Dry/LWL Case)
1065.779 388.189 639.43 47.615 133.222 15.636 103.01 104.937 105.90 194.711 193.746 191.815 194.711 103.006 48.524 154.299
1049.214 388.189 635.31 60.775 131.152 15.636 100.82 103.286 104.52 192.754 191.522 189.058 192.754 100.822 48.524 154.299
986.935 388.189 675.13 45.578 123.367 15.636 90.73 92.581 93.51 187.273 186.349 184.501 187.273 90.733 48.524 154.299
971.076 388.189 671.01 59.043 121.384 15.636 88.63 91.022 92.22 185.414 184.217 181.823 185.414 88.628 48.524 154.299
Safe Safe Safe Safe
Seismic Combination - Seismic in Transverse Direction (Dry/LWL Case)
1065.779 179.703 -175.10 458.99 133.222 15.636 147.06 165.670 174.98 150.656 141.351 122.742 174.975 122.742 22.463 71.429
1049.214 179.703 -175.10 458.42 131.152 15.636 145.01 163.594 172.89 148.568 139.275 120.689 172.887 139.275 22.463 71.429
986.935 179.703 -139.40 456.96 123.367 15.636 134.79 153.315 162.58 143.218 133.954 115.428 162.578 133.954 22.463 71.429
971.076 179.703 -139.40 456.69 121.384 15.636 132.81 151.330 160.59 141.227 131.969 113.454 160.588 131.969 22.463 71.429
Safe Safe Safe Safe
169
Design of Pile ( Dry/LWL Condition)

Case: Seismic Combination- Seismic in longitudinal Direction (Dry/LWL Case) (Min-Upward Seismic)

Diameter Of Pile, D= 1.200 m
Hu= 48.524 T
factored Axial load, Pu= 88.628 T
factored moment, Mu= 154.299 Tm
Pu / fck * D2= 0.0175849
Mu / fck * D3= 0.0255123
As
Clear cover d= 0.075 m D
Cover to main bar d'= 0.0975 m
d'/D= 0.0813
p/fck= 0.025 Refer Chart No. 60 of IS:SP-16
P as per IRC SP-16= 0.875 % Min steel, Cl. 709.4.4 of IRC:78 = 0.4 %
Area of Steel Required= 0.009896 sqm (Maximum of 0.875%, 0.4%)

Area of steel Provided , As= 0.01129 sqm Safe 23 nos. 25 dia. Spacing= 137
The above steel is provided through out the depth, no curtrailment is allowed as per IS:2911 cl-5.11.2
Check for shear

Shear force in pile at Tip (Vu=Hu) 48.524 T
Area of Coss section of pile Ag= 1.131 sqm
Shear stress= 42.905 T/sqm
Since section is under axial compression, hence shear strength of the section shall be more and shall be
as per Cl.-40.2.2 of IS:456-2000.
δ = 1+3Pu/Ag.fck sub jected to maximum 1.5 = 1.067
Percentage of steel provided = 1%
δ = 1.067 % of Steel(IS:456-Table-19) Tc
Tc= 0.67 1 0.67
δTc= 0.71489 1.25 0.73
Tc= kTc= 0.71489 N/mm2 >= 0.4290464 N/mm2 Safe
However provide stirrups as per IRC 112:2011 Cl-16.2.3

Dia. Of bar provided for stirrups shall be maximum of 8mm or 1/4 of main bar = 8 mm
Dia. Of stirrups provided = 10 mm
Providing 10 mmdia.Bar, C/Area of 2-legged stirrups= 0.0001571 sqm
Spacing shall be least of the following
i) 12 times dia. Of main bar 300
Refer IRC:112-Cl-16.2.3(4) ii) Least lateral dimension 1200
iii) 200 c/c 200
Say 200 mm c/c
170
Forces on Pile ( HFL Condition) - For design of pile only

4 5
2 7

1 8
0.5 243.345 ILL= 243.345 m4

Basic combination (HFL Case) :
1386.09 236.967 73.10 319.046 173.262 15.636 174.12 187.055 193.52 203.676 197.209 184.273 203.676 174.120 29.621 94.190
Service Condition
1296.652 236.967 73.10 212.060 162.081 15.636 166.19 174.791 179.09 189.243 184.944 176.346 189.243 166.193 29.621 94.190
1386.095 237.018 73.10 355.632 173.262 15.636 173.01 187.426 194.64 204.789 197.579 183.161 204.789 173.008 29.627 94.211
Wind-Span Intact
1296.652 237.018 73.10 248.646 162.081 15.636 165.08 175.161 180.20 190.355 185.315 175.234 190.355 165.080 29.627 94.211
Seismic Combination - Seismic in longitudinal Direction(HFL Case)

951.414 408.611 845.82 47.615 118.927 15.636 74.38 76.308 77.27 194.748 193.783 191.853 194.748 74.378 51.076 162.416
934.849 408.611 841.70 60.775 116.856 15.636 72.19 74.657 75.89 192.792 191.560 189.096 192.792 72.193 51.076 162.416
878.958 408.611 881.52 45.578 109.870 15.636 62.90 64.751 65.68 188.109 187.185 185.337 188.109 62.903 51.076 162.416
863.099 408.611 877.40 59.043 107.887 15.636 60.80 63.192 64.39 186.249 185.053 182.659 186.249 60.798 51.076 162.416
Seismic Combination - Seismic in Transverse Direction (HFL Case)

951.414 167.407 -66.67 454.11 118.927 15.636 125.39 143.796 153.00 143.741 134.536 116.124 153.002 116.124 20.926 66.542
934.849 166.561 -66.67 453.54 116.856 15.636 123.33 141.719 150.91 141.653 132.459 114.071 150.913 123.332 20.820 66.205
878.958 167.407 -30.97 452.08 109.870 15.636 113.91 132.239 141.40 137.102 127.937 109.609 141.404 113.911 20.926 66.542
863.099 166.561 -30.97 451.80 107.887 15.636 111.94 130.254 139.41 135.111 125.952 107.634 139.413 111.936 20.820 66.205
171
Forces on Pile ( HFL Condition) - For checking pile capacity

4 5
2 7 Maximum moment allowed per pile 176.00 Tm
Lateral capacity of pile in seismic case = 69.22
1 8
0.5 243.345 ILL= 243.345 m4

Basic combination (HFL Case) :
1009.94 157.978 10.74 213.118 126.242 15.636 134.65 143.293 147.61 149.105 144.785 136.144 149.105 134.652 19.75 62.79
Service Condition
950.311 157.978 10.74 141.794 118.789 15.636 129.37 135.116 137.99 139.483 136.608 130.860 139.483 129.368 19.75 62.79
1009.940 158.012 10.74 237.509 126.242 15.636 133.91 143.540 148.36 149.847 145.032 135.403 149.847 133.911 19.75 62.81
Wind-Span Intact
950.311 158.012 10.74 166.185 118.789 15.636 128.63 135.364 138.73 140.224 136.856 130.118 140.224 128.626 19.75 62.81
Safe Safe Safe Safe
Seismic Combination - Seismic in longitudinal Direction(HFL Case)
951.414 408.611 845.82 47.615 118.927 15.636 74.38 76.308 77.27 194.748 193.783 191.853 194.748 74.378 51.08 162.42
934.849 408.611 841.70 60.775 116.856 15.636 72.19 74.657 75.89 192.792 191.560 189.096 192.792 72.193 51.08 162.42
878.958 408.611 881.52 45.578 109.870 15.636 62.90 64.751 65.68 188.109 187.185 185.337 188.109 62.903 51.08 162.42
863.099 408.611 877.40 59.043 107.887 15.636 60.80 63.192 64.39 186.249 185.053 182.659 186.249 60.798 51.08 162.42
Safe Safe Safe Safe
Seismic Combination - Seismic in Transverse Direction (HFL Case)
951.414 167.407 -66.67 454.11 118.927 15.636 125.39 143.796 153.00 143.741 134.536 116.124 153.002 116.124 20.93 66.54
934.849 166.561 -66.67 453.54 116.856 15.636 123.33 141.719 150.91 141.653 132.459 114.071 150.913 123.332 20.82 66.21
878.958 167.407 -30.97 452.08 109.870 15.636 113.91 132.239 141.40 137.102 127.937 109.609 141.404 113.911 20.93 66.54
863.099 166.561 -30.97 451.80 107.887 15.636 111.94 130.254 139.41 135.111 125.952 107.634 139.413 111.936 20.82 66.21
Safe Safe Safe Safe
172
Design of Pile ( HFL Condition)

Case: Seismic Combination- Seismic in longitudinal Direction (Dry/LWL Case) (Min-Upward Seismic)

Hu= 51.076 T
Pu / fck * D2= 0.0120631
Mu / fck * D3= 0.0268545
As
d'/D= 0.0813

Check for shear

as per Cl.-40.2.2 of IS:456-2000.
Percentage of steel provided = 1%
Tc= 0.67 1 0.67
δTc= 0.70082 1.25 0.73

iii) 200 c/c 200
Say 200 mm c/c
173
DESIGN OF PILE CAP
DESIGN DATA
1.38
2.13 L1= 2.17
H1 1.5 1.8
3.6
0.15
0.75
Es= 200000 N/mm2
Diameter of main bar at bottom(Long.) = 0.025 m
Diameter of bar at top (Long.) = 0.016 m
Diameter of main bar at top (Trans.) = 0.016 m
Diameter of main bar at bottom(Trans.) 0.016 m
Diameter of shear reinforcement = 0.01 m
No. of Leg used for stirrups = 10
E/F - Earth Face R/F - River Face E/F R/F
Area of pile cap projected beyond the face of abutment 34.719 35.371 sqm
C.g. of pile cap projection from face of abutment(E/F) 1.065 1.085 sqm
Height of abutment = 4.787 m
Width of pile cap = 16.300 m
Thk. Of Pile cap = 1.800 m
Depth of pile = 22.476 m
Spacing of pile in Transverse direction = 4.933 m
Vertical capacity of pile = 253.750 T
E/F R/F
Dist of Outer pile from face of the abutment= 1.380 1.42 m
Dist of inner 1st pile from face of the abutment= 0.000 0 m
Dist of inner 2nd pile from face of the abutment= 0 0
Note:- E/F - Earth Face Non Seis. Seis. Non Seis.
DESIGN LOAD R/F - River Face E/F R/F R/F
Average load on Outer pile = 217.508 135.02 185.94
Max. load on inner 1st pile (Non Seis.) = 0.000 0.00 0.00
Max. load on inner 2nd pile (Non Seis.) = 0.000 0.00 0
DESIGN FOR MOMENT

Non Seis. Seismic Non Seis.
Total moment at face of abut. Due to react. From piles E/F R/F R/F
=4X(217.508X1.38+0X0+0X0) 1200.644 745.3089 1056.132 tm
Moment due to weight of soil above pile cap -318.605 0.000 0.000 tm
Moment due to weight of pile cap -166.391 -172.699 -172.6989 tm
174
Resultant Moment 715.648 572.610 883.433 tm

Resultant moment per meter= 43.905 35.129 54.19835 Tm
Designing as Beam
Effective cover considering 25mm dia. Bar = 87.5 mm
Width of beam considered b= 1m

2
Effective depth required def.=Sqrt(Mu/k*fck*b)
def.= 0.34 Safe
Steel - Longitudial - Bottom

x/d= 0.014779 z= 1.7024682 m
Spacing=0.000491 X 1000/0.002592 = 189 mm c/c
Say 150 mm c/c Safe
Steel - Longitudinal - Top

2
Minimum steel as per IRC:112 cl. 16.5.1.1 @ 0.072% (Half at Top) 0.001296 m
2
Spacing= 0.00020106 X 1000/0.001296 = 155 mm c/c
Maximum spacing shall be lesser of 3h 400mm (Refer IRC:112-16.6) 400 mm c/c
Say 150 mm c/c Safe
Steel - Transverse - Top & Bottom

2
Minimum steel as per IRC:112 cl. 16.5.1.1 @ 0.072% (Half at Top & half Bottom) 0.001296 m
2
Spacing= 0.00020106 X 1000/0.001296 = 155 mm c/c
Say 150 mm c/c Safe
Provide 16 mm diameter bar at the face of cap all around 4 Nos
CHECK FOR SHEAR
a) One Way Shear critical section for shear is taken at deff from abutment face
Distance of critical Section from face of abutment = 1.713 m
Distance of centre of pile from the critical section
Outermost Pile = -0.293 m
Inner Pile(1st Row) = -3.893 m
Inner Pile(2nd Row) = -7.493 m
Rection contributing towards shear at section(307.2.5.4-IRC21-2000)
Outermost Pile = 0
Inner Pile(1st Row) = 0
Inner Pile(2nd Row) = 0
Shear force at critical section due to reaction from pile 4X(185.938727876406X0+0X0+0X0)= 0.000
Shear force at critical section due to weight of pile cap = -93.41123 t
Shear force at critical section due to weight of soil = 0 t
Resultant Shear (V) = 93.411 t
Shear stress = V/Bd = 3.3 t/m2
100As/Bd= = 0.2 %
175
k= 1 % of Steel(IS:456-Table-19) Tc
Tc= 0.33 0.15 0.29
kTc= 0.33 0.25 0.37

(Shear Reinforcement not required)
Shear reinforce ment will be provided to carry a shear
Vs=V-Tc*b*d= 0N
Provide 10 mm dia.10 legged stirrups , Area= 790 sqmm
Spacing= N.A.
No Shear Reinforcement is needed as per IS:456-2000 cl.-26.5.1.6
Provide 10 mm dia.10 legged stirrups , Area, Asv= 790 sqmm
spacing sv= 0.87*415*790/(1000*0.4)
Spacing required= 710 mm c/c
Maximum spacing will be min. of 0.75d or 300= 300
Hence Provide 10 mm dia.10 legged stirrups ,at spacing= 300
b) Punching Shear (IRC112-2011,Cl.-10.4.5)
critical section for shear is taken at 2*deff from face of pile

Effective Depth at critical section d= 1.713 m
Distance of eff. Section from face of pile = 3.426 m
Distance of critical section from the centre of pile = 4.026 m
Shear force at critical section due to max load on pile = 217.508 t
Perimeter at critical section =2*3.14159*4.026/4+2*0.75 u= 7.824 m
p1= 0.02
K=1+sqrt(200/d)<=2 K= 1.34
vRd=0.12K(80p1fck)^1/3 Punching shear stress at control perimeter = 61.5 t/sqm
Resultant Shear from pile to pile cap VEd,red 217.508 t

vEd,red= VEd,red/ud = 16 t/sqm
Safe
176
DESIGN OF TRANSVERSE SEISMIC REACTION BLOCK
Longitudinal Outer Girder

Dirtwal
Reaction Block
Pedastal
Abutment cap
0.80
Transverse
0.80 Seismic Reaction
Block
0.80
DESIGN DATA
Ht. of Contact of Reaction Block with Girder (Neprene Pad)= 0.2 m

Height of Reaction Block= 0.8 m
Thickness of Reaction Block= 0.80 m
Longitudinal Width of Reaction Block= 0.80 m
No. of Reaction Block= 1 Nos. on either side
Live Load Reaction at Abutment including impact= 144.1515 t
Dead Load Reaction of Abutment (Left Span)= 150 t
Total Reaction at Abutment including impact= 294 t
Horizontal Seismic Coeff.(Refer IRC 6)= 0.36 Conidering R=1, as per IRC6: 2014
Total Horizontal Load on one Reaction Block= 105.895 t
Height of Reaction force from Abutment cap= 0.625 m
Dia. Of bar Stirrups Ah= 0.012 m
Dia. Of bar Stirrups Avf= 0.012 m
Dia. Of bar As= 0.025 m
Grage of Concrete= M 40
a= 0.625 m S= 0.8 d= 0.59 m b= 0.80 m
h= 0.8 Vu= 105.895 t d'= 0.74 m
177
Check for Design Method

a/d'= 0.847
< 1 Designed as Bracket
Check for Shear Strength
Vu/bd= 2.240 < 4.8 OK
Calculation of Direct Tension Reinforcement At
At= Hu/0.85*fsy
Where fsy=500, for Fe-500 steel
Where, Hu=1.7*Actual Hrizontal force >=0.2*Vu
Hu= 21.179 t
At= 0.000498 sqm
Calculation of Flexural Tension reinforcement Af
Af= [Vu*a+Hu(h-d')]/0.85*fsy*d
= 0.00269 sqm
Calculation of Shear Friction Reinforcement
Avf= Vu/0.85*fsy*μ
Where,μ=1.4 monolithic concrete
= 0.00178 sqm
Provide 2 legged 12 φ 8Nos
Steel Provided= 0.0018 Safe
Spacing = 105 mm c/c
From top of Abutment cap
Calculation of Total Primary Tensile Reinforcement As
As > (Af+At)= 0.003188 sqm
As >(2*Avf/3+At)= 0.001685 sqm
As >(0.04*fc/fsy)*b*d= 0.001511 sqm
As= Max of the above Three
As = 0.003188 sqm
Provide 25 φ 7Nos
Calculation of Horizontal Stirrups below As
Ah >0.5*Af 0.001345 sqm
Ah >0.333*Avf 0.000593 sqm
Ah= max. of the above Two
Ah = 0.001345 sqm
Provide in 1 Layer 2 legged 12 φ 6Nos
Provide this stirrups below As and within a depth of 2/3d'
d'
h(S)
Anchor Bar of Dia.25

Vu
0.80 2 legged 12 φ 6Nos in 1 Layer
a
25 φ 7Nos
0 2 legged 12 φ 8Nos
178
N.H.-Bhagalpur Eff. Span= 14.00 No. of Span= 3

Design Summary of Abutment on Pile foundation for Bridge - in Replacement of Existing Narrow & Damaged Bridge in Km.
143 of NH-80
Job. No.- NH-333 (Limit State Design) Load on Pile Vertical Horizonntal
a1 a2 a3 a4 a5 Non Seismic 169 21
800 800 1220 500 0 Seismic 195 51
c1 c2 c3 c4 c5 d
1500 300 600 2287 300 1200
H1 H2 h1 h2 h3 h4 h5 h6 No Of Piles
4787 22500 1787 3024 -24 1800 20700 -- 8
Notes in GAD
w1 w2 w3 w4 c φ γdry
750 3600 4933 2130 0 30 1.80
WB WL CR GS CL DWL SLA P
5100 16300 2750 2625 2750 16000 16000 150
Formation Cap Lev. HFL Bed Top of Cap Scour Level Fnd. Lev.
101.511 99.724 99.064 96.700 96.724 96.332 74.224
Grade of Concrete in Different Component

Abut Cap Abut Pile Pile cap Seis. Blk. -- -- -- --
M 30 M 30 M 35 M 35 M 40 -- -- -- --
Transverse Block Longitudinal Block

r1 r2 r3 r4 r5 r6
800 800 800 350 800 1600
Bearing Size Pedastal Size

lo bo ho Lo Bo Ho
500 360 96 800 660 282
n 5 hi 12 hs 4 he 6
c 6
b1 b2 b3 b4 b5 b6 b7 b8
105Nos. 105Nos. 4Nos. 52Nos. T-12 T-12 T-16 T-10
T-16 T-16 T-16 T-12 305mm c/c 145mm c/c 145mm c/c 200mm c/c 200mm c/c
b9 b10 b11 b12 b13 b14 b15 b16

T-10 T-12 T-12 T-12 T-12 3Nos. T-10 3Nos.
200mm c/c 150mm c/c 150mm c/c 150mm c/c 150mm c/c T-16 200mm c/c T-16
for "b12,b13,b14,b15 & b16 " refer straight return design page
Transverse Seismic Reaction Blk.
b17 b18 b19 b20 b21
1Nos. 7Nos. 8Nos. 2 legged 6Nos. 2 legged 7Nos.
T-25 T-25 T-12 T-12 T-10
e1 e2 e3 e4 e5 e6 e7 e8
T-25 T-16 T-16 T-16 4Nos. 23Nos. T-10 T-10
150mm c/c 150mm c/c 150mm c/c 150mm c/c T-16 T-25 200mm c/c 300mm c/c
-- 10 legged
Perimeter of Well Cap= 36.92 m
a1 a2 a3 a4 c1 c2 c3 c4 c5
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
179
Design Of Pier on Pile Foundation

Solid Wall Type
C o n t e n t s (Limit State Design)
Input Data
Seismic coefficient
Design of Pier Cap
Analysis of Forces at top of Cap
Design of Pier Shaft
Analysis of Forces at bottom of Cap
Lateral and Axial Capacity of Pile
Axial Capacity of Pile
Design of Pile
Design of Pile Cap
Design summary used for Drawing
180
Substructure Design for Pier (Limit State Design)

Levels and figure shown in following drawings is for calculation purposes, it is not in scale
Date:- 9/15/2016 17:52
Structure Identification No.- in Replacement of Existing Narrow & Damaged Bridge in Km. 143 of NH-80
0.075 Avg. Wearing coat Colour Code
RL-101.696 0.065mm wearing coat at Centre of Carriageway
0.860m (Railing Height)

RCC M40 Crash Barrier Railing RCC M40 Crash Barrier Railing RL-101.511
0.30m (Kerb Height)
RCC T-Beam & Slab RCC T-Beam & Slab 1.415m

RL-99.724 RL-98.424
1.787m
Details of Bearing, Pedastal & Pier Cap
1.800m 0.660 0.280m 0.04 0.280m
6.187m HFL= 99.064
1.00m 0.360m 0.360m
4.400m 0.300m 0.090m 0.15 0.090m
0.300m Pedestal Pedestal 0.282m
3.730 0.660m 0.660m 0.389 0.50m
3.740 0.50m
1.00m 0.400m
2.050 2.050 0.178
LWL 96.366 Seismic pad= 0.200 0.500 0.030
Bed Level 96.366 Length of Bearing= 0.500
RL-95.324
1.800m Pile Cap
RL-93.524
RL-95.192 SSL
5.100m 0 RL-94.762 MSL
RL-67.524 Foundation Level
0.55 0.45 0.45

1.500m 11.000 1.500 0.550m
16.000m
7.949 C.G of Superstructure
8.000
C.G. of Pier 0.860m
C.G. of Live load
RL 0.051
101.396 0.000m 0.300m
0.200m 0.250m
0.15 0.15
2.75 2.75 0.700m
2.62 2.62 2.62 2.62
0.400m
0.50m
13.20
0.50m Pier Cap 0.000
8.600 0.300
##### 6.7 0.150
0.250
' Maximum Transverse Eccentricity of Live Load= 2.225m 0.55 0.3
181
Data for Design of Pier & Pile

1) Designed as Two Lane (T) or Four Lane (F) = T
2) Type of Substructure (Circular - C, Rectangular - R) = R
3) Type of Bearing ( Neoprene- N, Pot PTFE - P, Tar Paper - T) = N
4) Type of Foundation ( Open - O, Raft - R, Pile - P, Well - W ) = P
5) Length of Longer Standard Span for DL = 14.00 Effective Span for LL= = 14.00 m
6) Overall longer span = 14.56 m
7) Length of shorter Stadard Span for DL = 14.00 Effective Span for LL= = 14.00 m
8) Overall Shorter Span = 14.56 m
9) No of Span = 3.00 m
10) Straight Transverse. width of Pier = 7.600 m
11) Length of Pier including ease water = 8.600 m
12) Transverse width of Pile Cap = 8.700 m
13) Shear Rating of the neoprene bearing = 940.00 T/m
14) Minimum Thickness of pedastal provided = 0.282 m
15) Dead load reaction at Pier due to Longer Span = 150.00 t
16) Dead load reaction at Pier due to Shorter Span = 705.00 t
17) DL and LL on outer girders at support DL= 75 LL=61.1 (1.35DL+1.5LL) 192.9 t
18) DL and LL on inner girders at support DL= 48 LL=35.52 (1.35DL+1.5LL) 118.1 t
19) Spacing of Girder in Transverse Direction = 2.625 m
20) No of logitudinal Girder = 5 Nos.
21) Skew Angle 0.0000 rad = 0.000 deg
22) Superelevation/ Camber in % 2.500 %
23) C.G. of super structure from bottom = 1.164 m
24) Radius of curve and maximum velocity in Km/h allowed Radius = 0 Velocity= 0 Kmph
25) Shift of foundation adjusted in pier cap Longitudinal= 0 Transverse= 0 m
26) Density of concrete = 2.5 t/m2
27) Grade of Concrete in Pier Cap M 30 Grade of concrete for Pier substructure M 30
28) Seismic Restrainer Long. Dim Trans. Dim Height Nos
Longitudinal Reaction Block 0.350 0.800 1.200 8
Transverse Reaction Block 1.1000 0.900 0.800 2
29) Seismic coefficient Zone I Z/2 Sa/g R/I
Zone 4 I=1.2 0.12 2.5 2.08
30) Live Load Reaction on Pier for long. Mom. Load on Span Maximum Minimum CG of LL
70r Track load 70 59.975 10.025 4.7 3.300m
70 R Wheel load in T 100 65.401 34.599 4.645 3.355m
Class A ( 1-Lane ) in T 43.2 30.701 12.499 3.35 4.650m
Class A ( 3-Lane ) in T 129.6 92.103 37.497 6.85 1.150m
31) Maximum and Minimum load adopted for 3 Lane 143.2 96.102 47.098 5.826 2.174m
32) Footpath provided on both side(2) or Provided on one Side (1) = 2
33) Weight of Railing per meter (0.75T on each side) = 1.500 T/m
34) Depth of scour / lowest bed level below HFL = 4.302 m
35) Velocity of water current = 0.847 m/s
182
Data for Design of Pile

36) Diameter of pile = 1.200 m
37) Depth of pile below Ground Level (GL) = 28.842 m
38) No. of pile in Transverse direction = 3 Nos.
39) No. of pile in longitudinal direction = 2 Nos.
40) Additional Pile at Centre = 0 Nos.
41) Spacing of pile in Transverse direction = 3.600 m
42) Spacing of pile in Longitudinal direction = 3.600 m
43) Grade of Concrete in Pile = M 35
44) Length of Pile = 26.000 m
45) Effective Length of Pile 26.000 m
RL-99.724 Top of Pier Cap
RL-99.064 HFL
1.80
RL-94.762 Maximum Scour Level
26.000
C.G in Traffic direc Area Cg

Area of Rectangle= 44.37 2.55
Area of Trapezoid= 0 0
Total Area of Cap= 44.37
C.g in Traffic direc= 2.55
C.G. of pile w.r.t. centre of shaft 0
C.G in flow direction Area Cg

Area of Rectangle= 44.37 4.35
Area of Trapezoid= 0 0
Total Area of Cap= 44.37
C.g in Traffic direc= 4.35
C.G. of pile w.r.t. centre of shaft 0
8.7
5.1
183
Calculation of Seismic Coefficient
(Z/2) x (Sa/g)
Ah=
(R/I)
Where Ah= Horizontal Seismic Coefficient
Z= Seismic Zone Factor
Sa/g= Avg. Response Acceleration Coefficient
R= Response Reduction Factor
I= Importance of bridge
2 D
T=
1000*F
INPUT DATA
Z= 0.24
R= 2.4996
I= 1.2
D= 150+705+96.102 951.10 9511.02 KN
Grade of Concrete= M 30
Length of Shaft= 8600 mm
Thickness of Shaft= 1000.00 mm
Moment of Inertia of Substructure(MI)= 7.17E+11 mm4
Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete(E)= 27386
Type of Soil Site= Medium
L= 4400 mm
Deflection of Abutment cap tip= 1 mm
(L^3/3E*MI)= 1.45E-06
Hence F= 691 KN
T= 0.23 sec
Pile Cap
Sa/g= 2.5
Z/2= 0.12
R/I= 2.083
Ah= 0.144
184
Maximum load on Pier due to Class 70R Wheel Loading

13.4
9.44
7.92
5.79
4.42
1.37 9.1762
Cumulative dist. From first load 9.1762
Live load on span 8 12 12 17 17 17 17
Spacing of Live Load 3.96 1.52 2.13 1.37 3.05 1.37
R1 R2
0.28 14.00 14.00
0.28
0.28
0.28
A1 P1R1 P1R2 P2
28.60 0.04 m Expansion Joint
C.G of Load from first 17T Wheel load= 5.1238 0
70 R Wheel Load on Pier Right Span 70 R Wheel Load on Pier Left Span
Spacing Distance from P2/A2 Load Moment Spacing Distance Load Moment
from A1
0 9.18 17 155.9954 0 0 0 0
1.37 10.55 17 179.2854 1.37 0 0 0
3.05 13.5962 17 231.1354 3.05 0.0000 0 0
1.37 0 0 0 1.37 13.6338 17 231.7746
2.13 0 0 0 2.13 11.5038 12 138.0456
1.52 0 0 0 1.52 9.9838 12 119.8056
3.96 0 0 0 3.96 6.0238 8 48.1904
Sum= 51 566.4162 Sum= 49 537.8162
Reaction on Pier due to Right Span P1R2 40.458 Reaction on Pier due to Left Span P1R1 38.415
P2R1 10.542 A1 10.585
Total load on the pier due to 70R Wheel Load= 78.873
Where P1R1-Left support of Pier-1 P2R1-Left support of Pier-2

P1R2-Right support of Pier-1 P2R2-Right support of Pier-2
185
Maximum load on Pier due to Class -A Wheel Loading
18.8
15.8
12.8
9.8
5.5
4.3 5.2088448
Cumulative dist. From first load 1.1 5.2088448
Live load on span 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 11.4 11.4 2.7 2.7
Spacing of Live Load 3 3 3 4.3 1.2 3.2 1.1
R1 R2
14.00 14.00
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
A1 P1R1 P1R2 P2
28.60
Place CG of Load at centre of pier 0.04 m Expansion Joint
C.G of Load from first 2.7T Wheel load= 9.09115523
Class-A Wheel Loading Right Span Class-A Wheel Loading Left Span
Spacing Distance from P2/A2 Load Moment Spacing Distance Load Moment
from A2
0 5.2088 2.7 14.0638809 0 0 0 0
1.1 6.31 2.7 17.0338809 1.1 0 0 0
3.2 9.51 11.4 108.40083 3.2 0 0 0
1.2 10.71 11.4 122.08083 1.2 0.00 0 0
4.3 0.000 0 0 4.3 13.59 6.8 92.4198556
3 0.000 0 0 3 10.59 6.8 72.0198556
3 0.000 0 0 3 7.59 6.8 51.6198556
3 0.000 0 0 3 4.59 6.8 31.2198556
Sum= 28.2 261.579422 Sum= 27.2 247.279422
Reaction on Pier due to Right Span P1R2 18.684 Reaction on Pier due to Left Span P1R1 17.663
P2R1 9.516 A1 9.537
Total load on the pier due to Class-A Load= 36.347
186
Maximum load on Pier due to Class 70R Track Loading

35 35
2.285 2.285
12.015 12.015
4.57
14.00 14.00
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.3
A1 P1R1 P1R2 P2
0.04 m Expansion Joint
Reaction due to 70 Track Load= P1R1 32.89375
Reaction due to 70 Track Load= P1R2 32.8938
A1 2.1063
P2R1 2.1063
Calculation of Transverse Eccentricity of Live Load
1:- 70R Track + Class-A

70R-Track Class-A
65.788 T 36.347 T
8.500
4.700

=(65.788X4.7+36.347X8.5)/(65.788+36.347)= 6.052
Eccentricity= 1.948
2:- 70R Wheel + Class A
70R-Track Class-A
78.880 T 36.347 T
8.390
4.645
187

=(78.88X4.645+36.347X8.39)/(78.88+36.347)= 5.826
Eccentricity= 2.174
3:- Three Lane of Class A
Class-A Class-A Class-A
36.347 T 36.347 T 36.347 T
10.35
6.850
3.35

=(36.347X3.35+36.347X6.85+36.347X10.35)/(36.347+36.347+36.347)= 6.850
Eccentricity= 1.15
Distribution of Live Load on Outer Girder (For Max. Load On Pier)
2.05 39.4365 39.4365

0.7 1.93
\
2.75 2.625
R1 R2
R1 due to left wheel= 39.44 t R2 due to left wheel= 0.00

R1 due to right wheel= 10.44 t R2 due to right wheel= 29.00
Total Live load on outer Girderincluding impact= 61.10 t Total Live load on Inner Girderincluding impact= 35.52
Note: It is assumed that the left wheel load is directly over outer girder if it comes beyond towards inner girder
Location G1 G2
Maximum of above including Impact 61.1 35.52
188
Distribution of Live Load on Outer Girder (For Max. Reaction on Bearing)
2.05 32.70 32.70

0.7 1.93
\
2.75 2.625
R1 R2
R1 due to left wheel= 32.70 t R2 due to left wheel= 0.00

R1 due to right wheel= 8.66 t R2 due to right wheel= 24.04
Total Live load on outer Girderincluding impact= 50.66 t Total Live load on Inner Girderincluding impact= 29.45
189
DESIGN OF PIER CAP Longitudinal

Seismic Transverse
Reaction Seismic
Block Reaction
Block
INPUT DATA
192.90 t 118.10 t 192.90 t
2.625 2.625
0.125
0.50 0.92 13.200 1.000

M 30
2.352
0.448 0.1
L1= 1.450 M 30
1.350 8.60
2.800
2.300 7.60 2.300
0.05 0.50
Pile Cap
8.70 1.8
0.15 Projection of Cap

Es= 200000 N/mm2
Diameter of main top bar = 0.025 m
Diameter of bar at bottom = 0.016 m
No. of Leg used for shear reinforcement = 4 Nos.
No. of Layers for the top main bar = 2
Layer spacing of main bar at top, in case of more than one layer of bar = 0.025 m
Area of Longitudinal bar at top of pier cap = 0.000491 sqm
Arera of Longitudinal bar at bottom of pier cap = 0.000201 sqm
Width of pier cap = 1.80 m
DESIGN FOR MOMENT

Factored Load(DL+LL) on the cantilever part of the pier cap-Outer Girder = 192.900 t
Factored Load(DL+LL) on the cantilever part of the pier cap-Inner Girder = 118.100 t
Lever Arm from the Face of Nosing of Pier, Outer Girder = 0.950 m
Lever Arm from the Face of Nosing of Pier, Inner Girder = 0.000 m
Effective Lever Arm adding 0.125xDia. Of Nosing, Outer Girder= 0.125 = 1.075 m
Effective Lever Arm adding 0.125xDia. Of Nosing, Inner Girder= 0.125 = 0.000 m
Total moment at face of pier assuming pier length 7.6 m = 207.368 tm
Dead Load of cantilever portion of pier cap = 9.450 t
Dead Load of cantilever portion of pier cap due to superstructure Depth diffrence = 0.000 t
C.g of dead load from support = 1.244 m
Moment due to weight of cap = 12.00 tm
Moment due to Weight of Transverse Reaction Block = 4.41 tm
Moment due to Weight of Longitudinal Reaction Block = 3.84 tm
Torsion due to One span with 70RW and one span without LL = 15.20 tm
Longitudinal moment corresponding to Torsion = 13.91 tm
190
Resultant Moment(for top Reinforecement) = 241.523 tm

dprovided assuming 2-layers of reinf.= deff Effective depth provided= = 0.897
b= 1.80 m
Mu= k*fck*bd2 where k= 0.1336
def.= 0.579 Safe
Main Steel
x/d= 0.1664337 z= 0.83443 m
Minimum steel as per IRC:112 cl. 16.5.1.1 @ 0.130% of c/s area 0.0013*1X1.8= 0.00234 Sqm
Providing 25 mmdia.Bar, Area of bar= 0.000491 Sqm
Spacing= 0.000491x2 X 1000/0.006654 = 148 mm
No. of Bar required= 14 Nos.
Provide no. of bar= 22 Nos.
Area of steel provided, Ast= 0.010802 sqm > 0.006654 (OK)
Provide 16 mm diameter bar at bottom 11
CHECK FOR SHEAR

a) One Way Shear
Distance of eff. Section from face of pier = 0.448 m
Shear force at critical section due to live load = 192.900 t
Shear force at critical section due to weight of pier cap = 7.515 t
Shear due to Torsion = 13.50933 t
Shear stress = V/Bd = 129 t/m2
100As/Bd= = 0.67 %
Tc= 0.5612 0.5 0.5
kTc= 0.5612 0.75 0.59
Tc= kTc= 0.5612 N/mm2 < 1.29 N/mm2 (Unsafe)
(Hence shear reinforcement is required)

Vs=V-Tc*b*d= 1233634.89 N
Provide 16 mm dia.4 legged stirrups , Area= 804 Sqmm.
Spacing required = 110
Minimum shear reinforcement as per clause no. 26.5.1.6 of IS 456-2000
Provide 16 mm dia.4 legged stirrups , Area= 804
Spacing required= =0.87*415*804/(1800*0.4)
= 400 mm c/c
ear reinforcement at spacing in cantilever portion= 100 mm c/c
191
WATER CURRENT FORCES

0
Considering 20 variation in the flow Design velocity= 0.847 m/s
Component along current direction= 0.847 x COS(20)= 0.796 m/s
Component along traffic direction= 0.847 x SIN(20)= 0.2897 m/s
Maximum Velocity along current direction= 0.796^2 x 2.0= 1.267 m/s
Maximum Velocity along traffic direction= 0.29^2 x 2.0= 0.168 m/s
Forces and Momrent in Current Direction

-- 0.000 m/s 0
Formation Level 0.000 m/s 0.00

F1 0 0.000
HFL 1.267 m/s
Bottom of Pier Cap 1.167 m/s 4.302 0.34
F2 3.740
Top of Pile Cap 0.166 m/s 4.302
0.56
F3 K for Cap= 1.5
Bottom of Cap 0.000 m/s 4.302
3.962 K(Above Cap)= 0.66
K(below Cap)= 1.25
F4
0.000
Maximum Scour Level

Fig.- Water Current Forces
(Current Direction)
Forces On Lever Arm @ Moment @ Lever Arm @ Moment @

Forces on Abutment along current Direction
Element Top of Cap Top of Cap Bottm. of Cap Bottom of Cap
Deck F1=0.052 x 1.50 x (0+1.267)x 0.5 x 14.56 x 0= 0.000 0 0.000 0.562 0
Pier Cap 0.052 x 0.66 x (1.267+1.167)x 0.5 x 1.8 x 0.34= 0.026 3.572 0.093 4.134 0.107
Shaft F2=0.052 x 0.66 x (1.167+0.166)x 0.5 x 1 x 3.4= 0.078 2.126 0.166 2.688 0.21
Fnd. Slab 0.052 x 1.5 x (0.166+0)x 0.5 x 5.1 x 0.561999999999999= 0.019 0.375 0.007
Total @ Top of Cap= 0.104 0.259
Total @ Bottom of Cap= 0.123 0.324125
Forces On Lever Arm @ Moment @

Forces on Abutment along current Direction
Element Scour level Scour Lev.
Below Fnd. Slab F4=0.052 x 1.25 x 0 x 0.5 x 5.1 x 0= 0 0.000 0.000
192
Forces and Momrent in Traffic Direction

-- 0.000 m/s
Formation Level 0.000 m/s 0.00

F1 0.00 0.000
HFL 0.168 m/s
Bottom of Pier Cap 0.155 m/s 4.302 0.34
F2 3.740
Top of Pile Cap 0.022 m/s 4.302
0.56
F3 K for Cap=
Bottom of Cap 0.000 m/s 4.302 1.5
3.962 K(Above Cap)= 1.5
F4 K(below Cap)= 1.25
0.000
Maximum Scour Level

Fig.- Water Current Forces
(Traffic Direction)
Forces On Lever Arm @ Moment @ Lever Arm @ Moment @

Force
Element Top of Cap Top of Cap Bottm. of Cap Bottom of Cap
Deck F1=0.052 x 1.50 x (0+0.168)x 0.5 x 14.56 x 0= 0.000 0 0.000 0.562 0
Pier Cap 0.052 x 1.5 x (0.168+0.155)x 0.5 x 13.2 x 0.34= 0.057 3.572 0.204 4.134 0.236
Shaft F2=0.052 x 1.5 x (0.155+0.022)x 0.5 x 8.6 x 3.4= 0.202 2.126 0.429 2.688 0.543
Fnd. Slab 0.052 x 1.5 x (0.022+0)x 0.5 x 5.1 x 0.561999999999999= 0.002 0.375 0.001
Total @ Top of Cap= 0.259 0.633
Total @ Bottom of Cap= 0.261 0.78
Note:- Tappered portion in pier cap has been neglected in calculating water current force, as the consideration is on safer side
Forces On Lever Arm @ Moment @

Element Force Scour level Scour Lev.
Pile Group F4=0.052 x 1.25 x 0 x 0.5 x 8.7 x 0= 0 0.000 0.000
193
LOAD AND MOMENT AT TOP OF Cap AT CENTRE

Horizontal Seismic coefficient 0.12 X 2.5 / 2.083 0.145
vertical seismic coefficient 0.667 x 0.145 0.097
a) Dead Loads and Moments of Superstructure ( Both Span Intact)

Service Condition
Dead Load reaction at pier due to longer span 150 t
Long. Moment about centre line of pier =150X0.3 45 tm
Dead Load reaction at pier due to shorter span 705 t
Long. Moment about centre line of pier =705X0.3 211.5 tm
Net Dead Load reaction at pier due to longer & shorter span 855.00 t
Resultant Long. Moment about centre line of pier -166.50 tm

Dead Load reaction at pier due to longer span =150 X 0.097= 14.55 t
Long. Moment about centre line of pier 4.365 tm
Dead Load reaction at pier due to shorter span =705 X 0.097= 68.39 t
Resultant Long. Moment about centre line of pier 16.15 tm

Horizontal load at pier =855 X 0.145= 123.975 t
Longitudinal Moment about centre line of pier =123.975X (4.4+0.282+0.09+1.164)= 735.9156 tm
b) Dead Loads and Moments of Superstructure ( shorter Span dislodged)

Service Condition
Dead Load reaction at pier 150.00 t
Longitudinal Moment about centre line of pier =150x 0.3 45 tm

Vertical load at pier due to dead load =150 X 0.097= 14.55 t
Longitudinal Moment about centre line of pier =14.55x 0.3 4.365 tm

Longitudinal Moment about centre line of pier =21.75X (4.4+0.282+0.09+1.164)= 129.11 tm
c) dead load and moment of substructure

Service Condition
Weight of Transverse =(2*0.9*1.1*0.8)*2.4 3.96 t
Long. Reaction Block =(8*0.8*0.35*1.2)*2.4 6.72 t
Weight of pier in LWL/DRY condition
Weight of Pier Cap L B Thickness Weight
Rectangular 13.2 1.8 0.5 29.7
Dim-Part-2 8.8 1
Trapezoidal 11 1.4 0.500 19.25
Area of pier including nosing =7.6X1+3.14159X1^2/4 8.385 m2
Weight of pier (T) =8.385X3.4X2.5 71.273 t
Weight of pier in HFL condition Thickness

Weight of Pier Cap L B Above HFL Below HFL Weight above Weight below Total
Rectangular 13.2 1.8 0.5 0 29.7 0 29.7
Dim-Part-2 8.8 1
Trapezoidal 11 1.4 0.340 0.16 13.09 5.79 18.88
a) Weight of shaft above HFL Ht.= 0 =8.385X0X2.5 0t
b) Weight of Shaft below HFL Ht.= 3.74 =8.385X3.74X(2.5-0.15) 73.696 t
Total 73.696 t
194
Sl. No. Particulars Load (T) Long. L.A. Long. Mom Trans. L.A Trans. Mom.
1 Longitudinal Seismic Reaction Block 6.720 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
2 Transverse Seismic reaction Block 3.960 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
3 Pier Cap Dry/LWL 48.950 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
4 Pier Shaft Dry/LWL cond. 71.273 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
5 Pier Cap HFL Condition 48.580 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
6 Pier Shaft HFL condition. 73.696 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.000
Total Dry/LWL condition 130.903 0.000 0.000
Total HFL condition 132.956 0.000 0.000

3 Pier Cap Dry/LWL 4.748 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Seismic Condition (Horizontal at top of Cap)

Sl. No. Particulars Load (T) Lever arm (m) Moment (Tm)
1 Longitudinal Seismic Reaction Block 0.974 =4.4+0.6 5.000 4.870
2 Transverse Seismic reaction Block 0.574 =4.4+0.4 4.800 2.755
3 Pier Cap Dry/LWL 7.098 C.g from top 0.732 3.668 26.033
4 Pier Shaft Dry/LWL cond. 10.335 =(4.4-0.5-0.5)/2 1.700 17.570
5 Pier Cap HFL Condition 7.044 3.668 25.834
6 Pier Shaft HFL condition. 10.686 1.70 18.166
d) Live Load and moment

Reaction on pier in t
for Longitudinal moment for trans.mom.
Sl. No. Particulars of load Maximum Minimum Load Momennt
1 70R Track Load 59.975 10.025 65.79 217.107
2 70 R Wheeled 65.401 34.599 78.873 264.618915
3 Class A (1 - Lanes) 30.701 12.499 36.347 169.01355
4 Class A ( 3-Lane ) in T 92.103 37.497 109.041 125.39715
Design Load= 96.102 47.098 78.873
Horizontal force due to Curve Force Transverse Moment

Considering 50% of Live Load in Seismic (WV2/127R) Non Seismic Seismic
Centrifugal force due to curve acting at For Maximum reaction for Long. Moment= 0.00 0.00 0.00 tm
1.2m above deck level For Maximum reaction for Trans. Moment= 0.00 0.00 0.00 tm
195
Service Condition
Maximum Reaction for longitudinal moment Rb (T)= 96.102 t
Minimum Reaction for longitudinal moment 47.098 t
Maximum reaction for transverse moment 78.873 t
Minimum Transverse moment Min. reaction for transverse momenet= 47.098 = 158.01 tm

Maximum Reaction for longitudinal moment =96.102 X 0.097 X 0.2 = 1.864 t
Minimum Reaction for longitudinal moment =47.098 X 0.097 X 0.2 = 0.914 t
Maximum longitudinal moment about the base =1.865 X 0.3 = 0.559 tm
Minimum longitudinal moment about base =0.914 X 0.3 = 0.274 tm
Maximum reaction for transverse moment =78.873 X 0.097 X 0.2 1.530 t
Maximum transeverse eccentricity = = 3.355 m
Seismic Condition (Horizontal Transverse)

Lever arm value, =6.187 + 1.2= = 7.387 m
e) Footpath Live Load

Intensity of live load =500 - ((40 X 14 - 300)/9) 471.11 kg/m2
Maximum Reaction on pier (Both Span both side Loaded) 2X (471.112 X 2 x14.56 X 1.5)/1000X 2 20.58 t
Minimum Reaction on pier (Both Span one side Loaded) =(2-1)X(471.112X2x 14.56X1.5)/1000X 2 10.29 t
f) Horizontal Forces due to Braking

Horizontal braking force due to
70R - Track 14 t
70R - Wheeled 20 t
Class A (1 - Lanes) 8.64 t
Class A (3 - Lanes) 25.92 t
Normal Case
Longitudinal Force at bearinng level (Span Dislodged)= Fh/2+Vr*ltc
Fh/2+Vr*ltc= 28.64*0.5+940*0.004 = 18.080 t
F F*Cos(0) F*Sin(0)
Max Longitudinal horizontal Force on pier (Span Dislodged) 18.080 18.08 0 t
Minimum Longitudinal force on pier (Span Dislodged) 18.080 18.08 0 t
Max Longitudinal horizontal Force on pier (Span Intact) 14.320 14.32 0
Minimum Longitudinal force on pier (Span Intact) 14.320 14.32 0
196
M M*Cos(0) M*Sin(0)
Max. Long. Moment (Span Dislodged) 18.08 X (4.4 + 0.282 + 0.09) = 86.278 86.278 0 tm
Min. Long. Moment (Span Dislodged) 18.08 X (4.4 + 0.282 + 0.09) = 86.278 86.278 0 tm
Max. Long. Moment (Span Intact) 14.32 X (4.4 + 0.282 + 0.09) = 68.335 68.335 0 tm
Min. Long. Moment (Span Intact) 14.32 X (4.4 + 0.282 + 0.09) = 68.335 68.335 0 tm
Max. Vertical Reactiondue to braking 28.64 X 0.5 X (1.2 + 0.065 + 1.416)/14= 2.741 t
Min. Vertical Reactiondue to braking -2.741 t
Seismic Case
Fh/2+Vr*ltc= 5.728*0.5+940*0.004 = 6.624 t
F F*Cos(0) F*Sin(0)
Max Longitudinal horizontal Force on pier (Span Dislodged)= 6.624 6.624 0
Minimum Longitudinal force on pier (Span Dislodged)= 6.624 6.624 0
Max Longitudinal horizontal Force on pier (Span Intact)= 2.864 2.864 0
Minimum Longitudinal force on pier (Span Intact)= 2.864 2.864 0
M M*Cos(0) M*Sin(0)
Max. Long. Moment (Span Dislodged) 6.624 X (4.4 + 0.282 + 0.09)= 31.610 31.61 0 tm
Min. Long. Moment (Span Dislodged) 6.624 X (4.4 + 0.282 + 0.09)= 31.610 31.61 0 tm
Max. Long. Moment (Span Intact) 2.864 X (4.4 + 0.282 + 0.09)= 13.667 13.667 0 tm
Min. Long. Moment (Span Intact) 2.864 X (4.4 + 0.282 + 0.09)= 13.667 13.667 0 tm
Max. Vertical Reactiondue to braking 5.728 X 0.5 X(1.2+ 0.065 + 1.416)/14= 0.548 t
WIND LOADS(in LWL/Dry condition)

Wind Forces due to Top Bed/LWL Element Ht. Mean Ht. Pressure Load/m Toal Load Moment
LWL/Dry Condition RL RL In m In m Kg/m2 Kg/m T Tm
Live Load (70R-W-15.2m) 101.511 96.366 6.645 300.000 2.268 15.071
Railing 102.556 96.366 0.860 5.760 71.800 61.748 0.899 5.1782
Deck/Girder including Kerb 101.696 96.366 1.600 4.530 65.650 105.040 1.530 6.9286
Pier Cap(Top width considered) 99.724 96.366 1.000 2.858 56.719 56.719 0.102 0.2918
Pier Shaft 98.724 96.366 2.358 1.179 47.074 111.001 0.111 0.1309
Total 4.910 27.600
Railing 102.556 96.366 0.860 5.760 120.000 1.747 10.063
Deck/Girder including Kerb 101.696 96.366 1.600 4.530 240.000 3.495 15.83
Pier Cap(Top width considered) 99.724 96.366 1.000 2.858 240.000 0.432 1.2347
Pier Shaft 98.724 96.366 2.358 1.179 240.000 0.240 0.283
Total 5.914 27.410
Wind force on deck 101.696 96.366 4.530 450.000 6.552 29.681
Both SpanIntact At Bed/Lwl Level At top of Cap At bottom of Cap

6.552 29.681 6.552 36.508 6.552 48.301
197
For Span Dislodged Case At Bed/Lwl Level At top of Cap At bottom of Cap
3.293 14.840 3.293 18.271 3.293 24.198
WIND LOADS(in HFL condition)

Wind Forces due to Top HFL Element Ht. Mean Ht. Pressure Load/m Toal Load Moment
Live Load (70R-W-15.2m) 101.511 99.064 3.947 300.000 2.268 8.952
Railing 102.556 99.064 0.860 3.062 57.841 49.743 0.725 2.218
Deck/Girder including Kerb 101.696 99.064 1.650 1.807 50.842 83.889 1.222 2.207
Pier Cap(Top width considered 99.724 99.064 0.660 0.330 41.980 27.707 0.050 0.016
Pier Shaft 99.064 99.064 0.000 0.000 40.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Total 4.264 13.394
Railing 102.556 99.064 0.860 3.062 120.000 1.747 5.349
Deck/Girder including Kerb 101.696 99.064 1.650 1.807 240.000 3.495 6.315
Pier Cap(Top width considered 99.724 99.064 0.660 0.330 240.000 0.432 0.143
Pier Shaft 99.064 99.064 0.000 0.000 240.000 0.240 0.000
Total 5.914 11.806
Wind force on deck 101.696 99.064 1.807 450.000 6.552 11.839
Both SpanIntact AT HFL At top of Cap At bottom of Cap

6.552 13.394 6.552 37.898 6.552 49.692
For Span Dislodged Case AT HFL At top of Cap At bottom of Cap

3.293 6.705 3.293 19.020 3.293 24.947
198
SUMMARY OF FORCES AND MOMENT (At Top of Pile Cap)

Case - 1 : Service Condition (Dry/LWL Case) :
Particulars Partial Vertical Load Long. Load Transverse Longitudinal Transverse
of Loads Safety (T) (HL) Load (HT) Moment Moment
DL+SIDL of Superstructure(2-Span Intact) 1.35 1154.250 -224.775 58.867
SIDL -Coat(2-Span Intact) 1.75 52.553 0.000 2.680
DL+SIDL of Superstructure(1-Span Intact) 1.35 202.500 45.000 10.328
DL Substructure 1.35 176.718 0.000 0.000
Live Loads
CWLL+Centrifugal force Max 1.5 144.153 43.246 396.928
Min 70.647 21.194 237.021
FPLL Max 1.5 30.867 9.260 0.000
Min 15.435 4.631 103.415
Breaking & Bearing Max 1.5 4.112 21.480 0.000 102.503 0.000
( Span Intact ) Min -4.112 21.480 0.000 102.503 0.000
Breaking & Bearing Max 1.5 27.120 0.000 129.417 0.000
( Span Dislodged ) Min 27.120 0.000 129.417 0.000
Span Dislodged 0.000 0.000 4.939 0.000 27.407
Max. 1562.653 21.480 0.000 -69.767 458.475
Min. 1465.491 21.480 0.000 -96.448 401.982
Max. 405.495 27.120 0.000 182.300 11.668
One Span Dislodged Total
Min. 405.495 27.120 0.000 182.300 11.668
Max. 1562.653 21.480 9.828 -69.767 513.237
Min. 1465.491 21.480 9.828 -96.448 456.744
Max. 405.495 27.120 4.939 182.300 39.075
Wind-Span Dislodged Total
Min. 405.495 27.120 4.939 182.300 39.075
Case - 2 : Service Condition (HFL Case) :

Particulars of Loads Partial Vertical Load Long. Load Transverse Longitudinal Transverse
Safety (T) (HL) Load (HT) Moment Moment
Substructure 1.35 179.491 0.000 0.000
Live Loads
CWLL+Centrifugal force Max 1.5 144.153 43.246 396.928
Min 70.647 21.194 237.021
FPLL Max 1.5 30.867 9.260 0.000
Min 15.435 4.631 103.415
( Span Intact ) Min -4.112 21.480 0.000 102.503 0.000
Bearing Force Max 1.5 27.120 0.000 129.417 0.000
Span Dislodged 0.000 4.939 0.000 28.530
Water Cuirrent Forces 1.5 0.389 0.156 0.950 0.388
Max. 1565.425 21.869 0.156 -68.817 458.863
Min. 1468.263 21.869 0.156 -95.498 402.370
Max. 408.267 27.509 0.156 198.999 12.056
Min. 408.267 27.509 0.156 198.999 12.056
Max. 1565.425 21.869 9.984 -68.817 515.711
Min. 1468.263 21.869 9.984 -95.498 459.218
Max. 408.267 27.509 5.095 198.999 40.586
Min. 408.267 27.509 5.095 198.999 40.586
199
Service Condition and Seismic in longitudinal Direction (Dry/LWL)

DL+SIDL of Superstructure Normal 1 855.000 -166.500 58.867
(Span Intact) 0.3 r3 25.754 4.845 1.313
Seismic
icl. WC
1.0 r1 128.329 761.763
0.3 r2 38.499 228.529
DL+SIDL of Superstructure Normal 1 150.000 45.000 10.328
(Span Disldg) 0.3 r3 5.018 1.746 0.256
Seismic
icl. WC
1.0 r1 23.927 142.034
0.3 r2 7.178 42.610
DL Substructure Normal 1 130.903 0.000 0.000
0.3 r3 3.809 0.000 0.000
Substruct
Seismic
ure
1.0 r1 18.981 51.227

0.3 r2 5.694 15.368
Live Loads @ 20%
CWLL Max Normal 1 19.220 5.766 52.924
with 0.3 r3 0.559 0.168 1.540
Seismic
CWLL
max
Cetrifugal 1.0 r1 0.000 0.000

Force 0.3 r2 0.836 6.176
Min Normal 9.420 2.826 31.603
0.3 r3 0.274 0.082 0.920
Seismic
CWLL
min
1.0 r1 0.000 0.000

0.3 r2 0.410 3.027
FPLL Max 1 20.578 6.173 0.000
Min 10.290 3.087 68.943
Breaking & Bearing Max 1 0.548 2.864 0.000 13.667 0.000
(Span Intact) Min -0.548 2.864 0.000 13.667 0.000
Bearing Max 1 18.080 0.000 86.278 0.000
(Span Disldg) Min 18.080 0.000 86.278 0.000
Max. 1086.402 195.204 0.000 927.183 114.644
DN - Seis.-Span Intact Total
Min. 1064.931 194.777 0.000 917.921 161.646
Max. 1026.156 195.204 0.000 917.157 108.937
UP - Seis.-Span Intact Total
Min. 1005.256 194.777 0.000 908.067 157.179
Max. 319.760 73.861 0.000 384.264 10.583
DN- Seis.- Span Dislodged Total
Min. 319.760 73.861 0.000 384.264 10.583
Max. 302.105 73.861 0.000 380.771 10.072
UP- Seis.- Span Dislodged Total
Min. 302.105 73.861 0.000 380.771 10.072
Maximum (Result.mom./Vert. Load) => Load and Mom 302.105 73.861 0.000 380.771 10.072
200
Service Condition and Seismic in Transverse Direction (Dry/LWL)

DL+SIDL SuperstructureNormal 1 855.000 -166.500 58.867
(Span Intact) 0.3 r3 25.754 4.845 1.313
Seismic
icl. WC
1.0 r2 128.329 761.763
0.3 r1 38.499 228.529
DL+SIDL SuperstructureNormal 1 150.000 45.000 10.328
(Span Disldg) 0.3 r3 4.802 1.310 0.245
Seismic
icl. WC
1.0 r2 23.927 142.034
0.3 r1 7.178 42.610
0.3 r3 3.809 0.000 0.000
Substruct
Seismic
ure
1.0 r2 18.981 51.227

0.3 r1 5.694 15.368
Live Loads @20%
CWLL Max Normal 1 19.220 5.766 52.924
with 0.3 r3 0.559 0.168 1.540
Seismic
CWLL
max
Cetrifugal 1.0 r2 2.787 20.587

Force 0.3 r1 0.000 0.000
Min Normal 9.420 2.826 31.603
0.3 r3 0.274 0.082 0.920
Seismic
CWLL
min
1.0 r2 1.366 10.089

0.3 r1 0.000 0.000
FPLL Max 1 20.578 6.173 0.000
Min 10.290 3.087 68.943
( Span Intact ) Min -0.548 2.864 0.000 13.667 0.000
Bearing Max 1 18.080 0.000 86.278 0.000
Max. 1056.372 2.864 194.290 -135.881 1192.119
Min. 1034.901 2.864 192.869 -141.993 1228.622
Max. 996.126 2.864 194.290 -145.906 1186.412
Min. 975.226 2.864 192.869 -151.848 1224.156
Max. 289.514 18.080 55.781 132.588 261.812
DN- Seis.- Span Dislodged Total
Min. 289.514 18.080 55.781 132.588 261.812
Max. 272.291 18.080 55.781 129.969 261.322
UP- Seis.- Span Dislodged Total
Min. 272.291 18.080 55.781 129.969 261.322
Maximum (Result.mom./Vert. Load) => Load and Mom 975.226 2.864 192.869 -151.848 1224.156
201
Service Condition and Seismic in longitudinal Direction(HFL)

(Span Intact) 0.3 r3 25.754 4.845 1.313
Seismic
icl. WC
1.0 r1 128.329 761.763
0.3 r2 38.499 228.529
(Span Disldg) 0.3 r3 5.018 1.746 0.256
Seismic
icl. WC
1.0 r1 23.927 142.034
0.3 r2 7.178 42.610
0.3 r3 3.869 0.000 0.000
Substruct
Seismic
ure
1.0 r1 19.278 51.626

0.3 r2 5.783 15.488
Live Loads @20%
CWLL Max Normal 1 19.220 5.766 52.924
with 0.3 r3 0.559 0.168 1.540
Seismic
CWLL
max
Cetrifugal 1.0 r1 0.000 0.000

Force 0.3 r2 0.836 6.176
Min Normal 9.420 2.826 31.603
0.3 r3 0.274 0.082 0.920
Seismic
CWLL
min
1.0 r1 0.000 0.000

0.3 r2 0.410 3.027
b) FPLL Max 1 20.578 6.173 0.000
Min 10.290 3.087 68.943
( Span Intact ) Min -0.548 2.864 0.000 13.667 0.000
Bearing Force Max 1 18.080 0.000 86.278 0.000
Water Cuirrent Forces 1 0.259 0.104 0.633 0.259
Max. 1058.485 195.849 0.104 928.334 114.903
Min. 1037.015 195.422 0.104 919.073 161.904
Max. 998.120 195.849 0.104 918.308 109.196
Min. 977.220 195.422 0.104 909.218 157.438
Max. 291.843 74.506 0.104 385.415 10.842
DN - Span Dislodged Total
Min. 291.843 74.506 0.104 385.415 10.842
Max. 274.069 74.506 0.104 381.922 10.330
UP - Span Dislodged Total
Min. 274.069 74.506 0.104 381.922 10.330
Maximum (Result.mom./Vert. Load) => Load and Mom 274.069 74.506 0.104 381.922 10.330
202
Service Condition and Seismic in Transverse Direction (HFL)

(Span Intact) 0.3 r3 25.754 4.845 1.313
Seismic
icl. WC
1.0 r2 128.329 761.763
0.3 r1 38.499 228.529
(Span Disldg) 0.3 r3 4.802 1.310 0.245
Seismic
icl. WC
1.0 r2 23.927 142.034
0.3 r1 7.178 42.610
0.3 r3 3.869 0.000 0.000
Substruct
Seismic
ure
1.0 r2 19.278 51.626

0.3 r1 5.783 15.488
Live Loads @20%
CWLL Max Normal 1 19.220 5.766 52.924
with 0.3 r3 0.559 0.168 1.540
Seismic
CWLL
max
Cetrifugal 1.0 r2 2.787 20.587

Force 0.3 r1 0.000 0.000
Min Normal 9.420 2.826 31.603
0.3 r3 0.274 0.082 0.920
Seismic
CWLL
min
1.0 r2 1.366 10.089

0.3 r1 0.000 0.000
b) FPLL Max 1 20.578 6.173 0.000
Min 10.290 3.087 68.943
( Span Intact ) Min -0.548 2.864 0.000 13.667 0.000
Max. 1058.485 3.123 194.781 -135.247 1192.896
Min. 1037.015 3.123 193.359 -141.360 1229.399
Max. 998.120 3.123 194.781 -145.273 1187.188
Min. 977.220 3.123 193.359 -151.214 1224.933
Max. 291.627 18.339 56.271 133.221 262.589
DN - Span Dislodged Total
Min. 291.627 18.339 56.271 133.221 262.589
Max. 274.285 18.339 56.271 130.602 262.099
UP - Span Dislodged Total
Min. 274.285 18.339 56.271 130.602 262.099
Maximum (Result.mom./Vert. Load) => Load and Mom 977.220 3.123 193.359 -151.214 1224.933
203
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF PIER (Dry/LWL Condition)

Maximum Longitudinal moment & correspong Load

Height, Lo= 4.400 m (From Bearing To Top of Pier Cap)
Le/D= 10.120 <12, Short Wall/Column Ref. Cl.-11.2 of IRC:112
Width of Pier excluding ease water= 7.600 m
Equivalent Width of Pier, b= 8.49 m > 4*1 Classified as Wall as per Cl-16.3(1) of IRC:112
IRC:112
Dia. Of mai bar on earth side= 25 mm

2
Vertical reinforcement on each face


x/d= 0.0496041 z= 0.906402 m

No. of Bar required=0.011037/0.000491 = 22.48 Nos.
'No. of bar provided on each side= 30 Nos. Safe
Spacing provided= 257.78 mm c/c
2
2
Spacing= 0.0001131 X4.4 X 1000/0.001473 = 337.84 mm c/c
Say 200 mm c/c Safe
204
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF PIER (Dry/LWL Condition)

Maximum Longitudinal moment & correspong Load

Height, Lo= 4.400 m (From Bearing To Top of Pier Cap)
Le/D= 10.120 <12, Short Wall/Column Ref. Cl.-11.2 of IRC:112
Width of Pier excluding ease water= 7.600 m
Equivalent Width of Pier, b= 8.49 m > 4*1 Classified as Wall as per Cl-16.3(1) of IRC:112
IRC:112
Dia. Of mai bar on earth side= 25 mm

2
Vertical reinforcement on each face


x/d= 0.0497573 z= 0.906343 m

No. of Bar required=0.011037/0.000491 = 22.48 Nos.
'No. of bar provided on each side= 30 Nos. Safe
Spacing provided= 257.77586 mm c/c
2
2
Spacing= 0.0001131 X4.4 X 1000/0.001473 = 337.84 mm c/c
Say 200 mm c/c Safe
205
LOAD AND MOMENT AT BOTTOM OF Cap AT CENTRE

Horizontal Seismic coefficient (0.12 X 2.5 / 2.083)x 1.25 0.181
vertical seismic coefficient Refer IRC:6-2014 Cl.-219.8 0.667 x 0.145x 1.25 0.121
a) Dead Loads and Moments of Superstructure ( Both Span Intact)
Service Condition
Dead Load reaction at pier due to longer span 150.00 t
Dead Load reaction at pier due to shorter span 705.00 t

Dead Load reaction at pier due to longer span =150 X 0.121= 18.15 t
Long. Moment about centre line of pier =18.15X0.3 5.445 tm
Dead Load reaction at pier due to shorter span =705 X 0.121= 85.305 t
Long. Moment about centre line of pier =85.305X0.3 25.5915 tm
Net Dead Load reaction at pier due to longer & shorter span =855 X 0.121= 103.46 t

Longitudinal Moment about centre line of pier =154.755X (1.8+4.4+0.282+0.09+1.164)= 1197.18468 tm
b) Dead Loads and Moments of Superstructure ( shorter Span dislodged)
Service Condition
Dead Load reaction at pier 150.00 t
Longitudinal Moment about centre line of pier =150x 0.3 45 tm

Vertical load at pier due to dead load =150 X 0.121= 18.15 t
Longitudinal Moment about centre line of pier =18.15x 0.3 5.445 tm

Longitudinal Moment about centre line of pier =27.15X (1.8+4.4+0.282+0.09+1.164)= 210.0324 tm
c) dead load and moment of substructure
Service Condition
Weight of Transverse =(2*0.9*1.1*0.8)*2.4 3.96 t
Long. Reaction Block =(8*0.8*0.35*1.2)*2.4 6.72 m3
Weight of pier in LWL/DRY condition

Weight of Pier Cap L B Thickness Weight
Rectangular 13.2 1.8 0.5 29.7
Dim-Part-2 8.8 1
Trapezoidal 11 1.4 0.500 19.25
Area of pier including nosing =7.6X1+3.14159X1^2/4 8.385

Weight of pier (T) =8.385X3.4X2.5 71.273 t
Soil above Fnd. Slab / Pile / Well Cap DRY -- 0.000

Foundation Fnd. Slab / Pile / Well Cap Area of Cap= 44.37 sqm =44.37x1.8x2.5 199.665 t
206
Weight of pier in HFL condition Thickness

Weight of Pier Cap L B Above HFL Below HFL Weight above Weight below Total
Rectangular 13.2 1.8 0.5 0 29.7 0 29.7
Dim-Part-2 8.8 1
Trapezoidal 11 1.4 0.340 0.160 13.09 5.79 18.88
a) Weight of shaft above HFL Ht.= 0 =8.385X0X2.5 0.000 t

b) Weight of Shaft below HFL Ht.= 3.74 =8.385X3.74X(2.5-0.15) 73.696 t
Soil above Fnd. Slab / Pile / Well Cap HFL -0.562*(5.1-1)*0.8 0.000
Weight of Fnd. Slab / Pile / Well Cap =44.37x1.8x2.35 187.685 t
3 Pier Cap Dry/LWL 48.950 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
5 Soil above Fnd. Slab / Pile / Well Cap DRY 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
6 Fnd. Slab / Pile / Well Cap in Dry Cond. 199.665 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
9 Soil above Fnd. Slab / Pile / Well Cap HFL 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
10 Fnd. Slab / Pile / Well Cap in HFL Cond. 187.685 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

3 Pier Cap Dry/LWL 5.923 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
5 Soil above Fnd. Slab / Pile / Well Cap DRY 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
6 Fnd. Slab / Pile / Well Cap in Dry Cond. 24.159 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
10 Fnd. Slab / Pile / Well Cap in HFL Cond. 22.710 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

Sl. No. Particulars Load (T) Lever arm (m) Moment (Tm)
1 Longitudinal Seismic Reaction Block 0.717 6.800 4.874
2 Transverse Seismic reaction Block 1.216 6.600 8.028
3 Pier Cap Dry/LWL 8.860 C.g from top 0.732 5.468 48.443
4 Pier Shaft Dry/LWL cond. 12.900 3.500 45.151
5 Soil above Fnd. Slab / Pile / Well Cap DRY 0.000 2.321 0.000
6 Fnd. Slab / Pile / Well Cap in Dry Cond. 36.139 --- 0.900 32.525
7 Pier Cap HFL Condition 8.793 5.468 48.076
8 Pier Shaft HFL condition. 13.339 3.500 46.686
9 Soil above Fnd. Slab / Pile / Well Cap DRY 0.000 2.321 0.000
10 Fnd. Slab / Pile / Well Cap in HFL Cond. 33.971 --- 0.900 30.574
207
d) Live Load and moment Reaction on pier in t

for Longitudinal moment for trans.mom.
Sl. No. Particulars of load Maximum Minimum Load Momennt
1 70R Track Load 59.975 10.025 65.7875 217.09875
2 70 R Wheeled 65.401 34.599 78.873 264.618915
3 Class A (1 - Lanes) 30.701 12.499 36.347 169.01355
4 Class A ( 3-Lane ) in T 92.103 37.497 109.041 125.39715
Design Load= 96.102 47.098 78.873
Horizontal force due to Curve Transverse Moment

Force
Considering 50% of Live Load in Seismic Non Seismic Seismic
Centrifugal force due to curve acting at For Maximum reaction for Long. Moment= 0.00 0.00 0.00 tm
1.2m above deck level For Maximum reaction for Trans. Moment= 0.00 0.00 0.00 tm
Service Condition
Maximum Reaction for longitudinal moment Rb (T)= 96.102 t
Minimum Reaction for longitudinal moment 47.098 t
Maximum reaction for transverse moment 78.87 t
Seismic Condition (Vertical) Considering 20% of Live Load , Refer IRC 6:2014, Table-1
Maximum Reaction for longitudinal moment =96.102 X 0.121X0.2= 2.326 t
Minimum Reaction for longitudinal moment =47.098 X 0.121X0.2= 1.140 t
Maximum longitudinal moment about the base =2.326 X 0.3= 0.698 tm
Minimum longitudinal moment about base =1.14 X 0.3= 0.342 tm
Maximum reaction for transverse moment =78.873 X 0.121X0.2= 1.909 t
Maximum transverse moment =1.909 X 3.355= 6.404 tm
Minimum Transverse moment Min. reaction for transverse momenet= 1.1397716 3.824 tm
Maximum horizontal force in Transverse direction =96.102 X 0.181X0.2= 3.4788924 t
Minimum horizontal force in transverse direction =47.098 X 0.181X0.2= 1.7049476 t
Lever arm value, =1.8+6.187 + 1.2= 9.187 m
Maximum Transverse moment about the base =3.479 X 9.187= 31.961 tm
Minimum Transverse moment about base =1.705 X 9.187= 15.663 tm
e) Footpath Live Load

Intensity of live load =500 - ((40 X 14 - 300)/9)= 471.11 kg/m2
Maximum Reaction on pier (Two Span) =2X (471.112 X 2 x14.56 X 1.5)/1000X 2= 20.58 t
Minimum Reaction on pier (Two Span) =(2-1)X(471.112X2x 14.56X1.5)/1000X 2= 10.29 t
Maximum Transverse moment due to footpath load =20.578x0 0.00 tm
Minimum Transverse moment due to footpath load =10.29 x 6.7 68.94 tm
f) Horizontal Forces due to Braking

Horizontal braking force due to
70R - Track = 14 t
208

Normal Case
Fh/2+Vr*ltc= 28.64*0.5+940*0.004 = 18.080 t
F F*Cos(0) F*Sin(0)
Max Longitudinal horizontal Force on pier (Span Dislodged) 18.080 18.08 0 t
Minimum Longitudinal force on pier (Span Dislodged) 18.080 18.08 0 t
Max Longitudinal horizontal Force on pier (Span Intact) 14.320 14.32 0 t
Minimum Longitudinal force on pier (Span Intact) 14.320 14.32 0 t
M M*Cos(0) M*Sin(0)
Max. Long. Moment (Span Dislodged) 18.08 X (1.8+4.4 + 0.282 + 0.09) = 118.822 118.822 0 tm
Min. Long. Moment (Span Dislodged) 18.08 X (1.8+4.4 + 0.282 + 0.09) = 118.822 118.822 0 tm
Max. Long. Moment (Span Intact) 14.32 X (1.8+4.4 + 0.282 + 0.09) = 94.111 94.111 0 tm
Min. Long. Moment (Span Intact) 14.32 X (1.8+4.4 + 0.282 + 0.09) = 94.111 94.111 0 tm
Max. Vertical Reactiondue to braking =28.64 X 0.5 X (1.2 + 0.065 + 1.416)/14= 2.741 t
Seismic Case
Change in leng(0.0000117*34+0.0002)x14.56/2 0.004
Fh/2+Vr*ltc= 5.728*0.5+940*0.004 6.624 t
F F*Cos(0) F*Sin(0)
Max Longitudinal horizontal Force on pier (Span Dislodged)= 6.624 6.624 0 t
Minimum Longitudinal force on pier (Span Dislodged)= 6.624 6.624 0 t
Max Longitudinal horizontal Force on pier (Span Intact)= 2.864 2.864 0 t
Minimum Longitudinal force on pier (Span Intact)= 2.864 2.864 0 t
M M*Cos(0) M*Sin(0)
Max. Long. Moment (Span Dislodged) 6.624 X (1.8+4.4 + 0.282 + 0.09)= 43.533 43.533 0 tm
Min. Long. Moment (Span Dislodged) 6.624 X (1.8+4.4 + 0.282 + 0.09)= 43.533 43.533 0 tm
Max. Long. Moment (Span Intact) 2.864 X (1.8+4.4 + 0.282 + 0.09)= 18.822 18.822 0 tm
Min. Long. Moment (Span Intact) 2.864 X (1.8+4.4 + 0.282 + 0.09)= 18.822 18.822 0 tm
Max. Vertical Reactiondue to braking =6.624 X 0.5 X(1.2+ 0.065 + 1.416)/14= 0.634 t
209
SUMMARY OF FORCES AND MOMENT (At Bottom of Pile Cap)

Service Condition (Dry/LWL Case) :
Particulars of Loads Partial Safety Vertical Load Long. Load Transverse Longitudinal Transverse
Factor (T) (HL) Load (HT) Moment Moment
DL Substructure 1.35 446.266 0.000 0.000
Live Loads
CWLL Max 1.5 144.153 43.246 396.928
Min 70.647 21.194 237.021
FPLL Max 1.5 30.867 9.260 0.000
Min 15.435 4.631 103.415
( Span Intact ) Min -4.112 21.480 0.000 141.167 0.000
Breaking & Bearing Max 1.5 27.120 0.000 178.233 0.000
Span Dislodged 0.000 4.939 0.000 36.297
Max. 1832.201 21.480 0.000 -31.103 458.475
Min. 1735.039 21.480 0.000 -57.784 401.982
Max. 675.042 27.120 0.000 246.866 11.668
Min. 675.042 27.120 0.000 246.866 11.668
Max. 1832.201 21.480 9.828 -31.103 530.927
Min. 1735.039 21.480 9.828 -57.784 474.434
Max. 675.042 27.120 4.939 246.866 47.965
Min. 675.042 27.120 4.939 246.866 47.965
Service Condition (HFL Case) :

Particulars of Loads Partial Safety Vertical Load Horizontal Transverse Longitudinal Transverse
Factor (T) Load (HL) Load (HT) Moment Moment
DL Substructure 1.35 432.865 0.000 0.000
Live Loads
a) CWLL Max 1.5 144.153 43.246 396.928
Min 70.647 21.194 237.021
b) FPLL Max 1.5 30.867 9.260 0.000
Min 15.435 4.631 103.415
( Span Intact ) Min -4.112 21.480 0.000 141.167 0.000
Bearing Force Max 1.5 27.120 0.000 178.233 0.000
Span Dislodged 0.000 4.939 0.000 37.421
Water Cuirrent Forces 1.5 0.392 0.185 1.170 0.486
Max. 1818.800 21.872 0.185 -29.933 458.961
Min. 1721.638 21.872 0.185 -56.614 402.468
Max. 661.641 27.512 0.185 248.036 12.154
Min. 661.641 27.512 0.185 248.036 12.154
Max. 1818.800 21.872 10.013 -29.933 533.499
Min. 1721.638 21.872 10.013 -56.614 477.006
Max. 661.641 27.512 5.124 248.036 49.574
Min. 661.641 27.512 5.124 248.036 49.574
210

DL+SIDL of Superstructure Normal 1 855.000 -166.500 43.605
(Span Intact) 0.3 r3 31.037 -6.044 1.583
Seismic
icl. WC
1.0 r1 160.190 1239.233
0.3 r2 48.057 371.770
DL+SIDL of Superstructure Normal 1 150.000 45.000 7.650
(Span Disldg) 0.3 r3 5.990 1.797 0.305
Seismic
icl. WC
1.0 r1 29.868 231.057

0.3 r2 8.960 69.317
0.3 r3 12.000 0.000 0.000
Seismic
1.0 r1 59.833 139.021

0.3 r2 17.950 41.706
Live Loads @20%
CWLL Max Normal 1 19.220 5.766 52.924
0.3 r3 0.698 0.209 1.921
Seismic
1.0 r1 0.000 0.000

0.3 r2 1.044 9.588
Min Normal 9.420 2.826 31.603
0.3 r3 0.342 0.103 1.147
Seismic
1.0 r1 0.000 0.000

0.3 r2 0.511 4.699
FPLL Max 1 20.578 6.173 0.000
Min 10.290 3.087 68.943
( Span Intact ) Min -0.634 2.864 0.000 18.822 0.000
Bearing Max 1 18.080 0.000 118.822 0.000
Max. 1299.764 289.938 0.000 1659.745 101.564
DN - Seis.-Span Intact Total Re. Hor. Load= 289.938 Re. Mom. 1662.850
Min. 1278.051 289.406 0.000 1648.723 148.412
Max. 1212.296 289.938 0.000 1671.414 94.556
UP - Seis.-Span Intact Total Re. Hor. Load= 289.938 Re. Mom. 1674.087
Min. 1191.295 289.406 0.000 1660.605 142.952
Max. 513.572 134.691 0.000 651.224 8.721
DN- Seis.- Span Dislodged Total Hor. Load= 134.691 Re. Mom. 651.283
Min. 513.572 134.691 0.000 651.224 8.721
Max. 477.593 134.691 0.000 647.630 8.110
UP- Seis.- Span Dislodged Total Hor. Load= 134.691 Re. Mom. 647.681
Min. 477.593 134.691 0.000 647.630 8.110
211

(Span Intact) 0.3 r3 31.037 -6.044 1.583
Seismic
icl. WC
1.0 r2 160.190 1239.233
0.3 r1 48.057 371.770
(Span Disldg) 0.3 r3 5.990 1.797 0.305
Seismic
icl. WC
1.0 r2 29.868 231.057

0.3 r1 8.960 69.317
0.3 r3 12.000 0.000 0.000
Substruct
Seismic
ure
1.0 r2 59.833 139.021

0.3 r1 17.950 41.706
Live Loads @20%
CWLL Max Normal 1 19.220 5.766 52.924
0.3 r3 0.698 0.209 1.921
Seismic
CWLL
max
1.0 r2 3.479 31.961

0.3 r1 0.000 0.000
Min Normal 9.420 2.826 31.603
0.3 r3 0.342 0.103 1.147
Seismic
CWLL
min
1.0 r2 1.705 15.663

0.3 r1 0.000 0.000
FPLL Max 1 20.578 6.173 0.000
Min 10.290 3.087 68.943
( Span Intact ) Min -0.634 2.864 0.000 18.822 0.000
Bearing Max 1 18.080 0.000 118.822 0.000
Max. 1299.764 2.864 289.509 -141.573 1925.255
Min. 1278.051 2.864 287.735 -147.706 1955.806
Max. 1212.296 2.864 289.509 -129.904 1918.247
Min. 1191.295 2.864 287.735 -135.824 1950.346
Max. 513.572 18.080 116.611 170.124 489.822
DN- Seis.- Span Dislodged Total Hor. Load= 118.004 Re. Mom. 518.524
Min. 513.572 18.080 116.611 170.124 489.822
Max. 477.593 18.080 116.611 166.529 489.211
UP- Seis.- Span Dislodged Total Hor. Load= 118.004 Re. Mom. 516.778
Min. 477.593 18.080 116.611 166.529 489.211
212

(Span Intact) 0.3 r3 31.037 -6.044 1.583
Seismic
icl. WC
1.0 r1 160.190 1239.233
0.3 r2 48.057 371.770
(Span Disldg) 0.3 r3 5.990 1.797 0.305
Seismic
icl. WC
1.0 r1 29.868 231.057

0.3 r2 8.960 69.317
0.3 r3 11.639 0.000 0.000
Substruct
Seismic
ure
1.0 r1 58.036 138.238

0.3 r2 17.411 41.471
Live Loads @20%
CWLL Max Normal 1 19.220 5.766 52.924
0.3 r3 0.698 0.209 1.921
Seismic
CWLL
max
1.0 r1 0.000 0.000

0.3 r2 1.044 9.588
Min Normal 9.420 2.826 31.603
0.3 r3 0.342 0.103 1.147
Seismic
CWLL
min
1.0 r1 0.000 0.000

0.3 r2 0.511 4.699
FPLL Max 1 20.578 6.173 0.000
Min 10.290 3.087 68.943
( Span Intact ) Min -0.634 2.864 0.000 18.822 0.000
Bearing Max 1 18.080 0.000 118.822 0.000
Max. 1289.477 287.602 0.000 1658.728 101.564
Min. 1267.764 287.070 0.000 1647.705 148.412
Max. 1202.730 287.602 0.000 1670.397 94.556
Min. 1181.729 287.070 0.000 1659.588 142.952
Max. 503.285 132.355 0.000 650.207 8.721
DN - Span Dislodged Total Re. Hor. Load= 132.355 Re. Mom. 650.265
Min. 503.285 132.355 0.000 650.207 8.721
Max. 483.042 132.355 0.000 651.117 8.876
UP - Span Dislodged Total Re. Hor. Load= 132.355 Re. Mom. 651.178
Min. 468.027 132.355 0.000 646.613 8.110
213

(Span Intact) 0.3 r3 31.037 -6.044 1.583
Seismic
icl. WC
1.0 r2 154.755 1197.185
0.3 r1 46.427 359.155
(Span Disldg) 0.3 r3 5.445 1.797 0.278
Seismic
icl. WC
1.0 r2 27.150 210.032

0.3 r1 8.145 63.010
0.3 r3 11.639 0.000 0.000
Substruct
Seismic
ure
1.0 r2 58.036 138.238

0.3 r1 17.411 41.471
Live Loads @20%
CWLL Max Normal 1 19.220 5.766 52.924
0.3 r3 0.698 0.209 1.921
Seismic
CWLL
max
1.0 r2 3.479 31.961

0.3 r1 0.000 0.000
Min Normal 9.420 2.826 31.603
0.3 r3 0.342 0.103 1.147
Seismic
CWLL
min
1.0 r2 1.705 15.663

0.3 r1 0.000 0.000
FPLL Max 1 20.578 6.173 0.000
Min 10.290 3.087 68.943
( Span Intact ) Min -0.634 2.864 0.000 18.822 0.000
Bearing Max 1 18.080 0.000 118.822 0.000
Max. 1289.477 2.864 280.107 -141.573 1869.575
Min. 1267.764 2.864 278.333 -147.706 1900.125
Max. 1202.730 2.864 280.107 -129.904 1862.567
Min. 1181.729 2.864 278.333 -135.824 1894.665
Max. 502.740 18.080 110.742 170.124 461.445
DN - Span Dislodged Total Re. Hor. Load= 112.208 Re. Mom. 491.807
Min. 502.740 18.080 110.742 170.124 461.445
Max. 468.572 18.080 110.742 166.529 460.890
UP - Span Dislodged Total Re. Hor. Load= 112.208 Re. Mom. 490.053
Min. 468.572 18.080 110.742 166.529 460.890
214
SUMMARY OF FORCES AND MOMENT (At Bottom of Founding Slab)

DL+SIDL of Superstructure(2-Span Intact) 1 855.000 -224.775 43.605
SIDL -Coat(2-Span Intact) 1 30.030 0.000 0.051
DL+SIDL of Superstructure(1-Span Intact) 1 150.000 45.000 7.650
DL Substructure 1 330.568 0.000 0.000
Live Loads
CWLL Max 1 96.102 28.831 264.619
Min 47.098 14.129 158.014
FPLL Max 1 20.578 6.173 0.000
Min 10.290 3.087 68.943
( Span Intact ) Min -2.741 14.320 0.000 94.111 0.000
Breaking & Bearing Max 1 18.080 0.000 118.822 0.000
Span Dislodged 0.000 3.293 0.000 24.198
Max. 1335.019 14.320 0.000 -95.660 308.275
Min. 1270.244 14.320 0.000 -113.448 270.613
Max. 495.583 18.080 0.000 168.327 8.416
Min. 495.583 18.080 0.000 168.327 8.416
Max. 1335.019 14.320 6.552 -95.660 356.576
Min. 1270.244 14.320 6.552 -113.448 318.914
Max. 495.583 18.080 3.293 168.327 32.614
Min. 495.583 18.080 3.293 168.327 32.614

DL+SIDL of Superstructure(2-Span Intact) 1 855.000 -166.500 43.605
DL+SIDL of Superstructure(1-Span Intact) 1 150.000 45.000 7.650
DL Substructure 1 320.641 0.000 0.000
Live Loads
a) CWLL Max 1 96.102 28.831 264.619
Min 47.098 14.129 158.014
b) FPLL Max 1 20.578 6.173 0.000
Min 10.290 3.087 68.943
( Span Intact ) Min -2.741 14.320 0.000 94.111 0.000
Span Dislodged 0.000 3.293 0.000 24.947
Max. 1325.092 14.581 0.123 -36.605 310.080
Min. 1260.318 14.581 0.123 -54.393 272.417
Max. 485.656 18.341 0.123 169.107 8.740
Min. 485.656 18.341 0.123 169.107 8.740
Max. 1325.092 14.581 6.675 -36.605 359.772
Min. 1260.318 14.581 6.675 -54.393 322.109
Max. 485.656 18.341 3.416 169.107 33.687
Min. 485.656 18.341 3.416 169.107 33.687
215
Lateral Capacity of pile-I.S. 2911 Part-1/Section-2-1979 (Reaffirmed 2002)

The Pile is designed as a circular column section subject to vertical load and moment. The horizontal force at the bottom
of the pile cap is distributed equally in all the piles. The pile section at the depth of fixity has been checked as the design
moment in pile are maximum at this section. The pile is designed under fixed head condition
DATA ( Pile )
Type of Pile Head(Free-R, Fixed-X) R/X X
Horizontal Subgrade Reaction K2= 97.73 Kg/cm2
Length of Pile above Ground Level L2 0 cm
Depth of pile below GL L= 2884.2 cm
Diameter of Pile under Consideration Dia.= 120 cm
Grade of Concrete used for pile M= 35 Mpa
Thickness of pile Cap Tpc= 180 cm
Depth of Pile Cap (Below GL) d= 104.2 cm
Length of pile under scour L1= 0 cm, rounded to nearest whole number
Lateral Deflection Restricted to Y= 1.20 cm
Calculation
Moment of Inertia of pile I= 10178760 cm4
Youngs Modulus of Pile Material E= 295804 Kg/cm2
Effective length of pile below scour Le= 2600.000 m
Calcuation of Depth of Fixity (Lf)
R 418.96 cm
4R 1675.8 cm
SinceLe=2600>4R=1675.8, Take value of Lf/R corresponding to L1/R from Fig 2 of IS2911-Par1/Sec2
L1/R 0
Lf/R 2.2
Depth of fixity "Lf" Lf= 921.70 cm As per graph
Start of Wethd.Rock below maximum sc Lf= NA cm
Equivalent Cantilever Length (L1+min(Lf))= 921.70 cm = 9.217018 m
Lateral capacity(Q= 12EIy/(L1+Lf)^3) Q= 55.38 T
Deflection at scour/bed level( Q(L1+Lf)^3/12EI) 1.2 cm
Fixed End Moment, Q(L1+Lf)/2 Mf= 255.22 Tm
Reduction factor for Max. Mom. m= 0.69
Actual Maximum Moment allowed M=m*Mf 176.10 Tm
Ground Level
Lf/R or Lf/T and "m"
2.5 Determination of Depth of Fixity

2.3 and reduction coeff. (Fixed Head Pile for sand and
d=104.2cm
2.1
1.9
1.7 Normaly loaded Clay)
1.5 Tpc=180cm
1.3
1.1
0.9
0.7
0.5
0 1 2 3 4 5 L2+L1=
L1/R or L1/T Scour level
L=2884.2cm
Le
Fixity "m" Sand "m" Clay
RL-93.524 Pile Cap Bottom
1.2cm
L2+L1=0 L2+L1=0
Scour Level RL-94.762 Scour Level
1.2cm<1.2cm
Le==26 Lf=9.217
RL-85.545 Fixing Level of pile
Founding Level of Pile RL-67.524

Note:- Above deflection is for Horizontal force of 55.38 T at Tip of pile
216
Input data for Pile Capacity PILE CAP

Stem diameter of pile = 1.200 m
Location of cutoff level below G.L = 2.842 m Layer-1
Location of Scour Lvel below G.L = 1.604 m
Layer-2
PILE
Depth of Pile below G.L. 28.842 m
Effective length of Pile below scour level = 26.000 m Fig is indicative only
Factor of safety for evaluating pile capacity = 2.500 in soil Layer-….
Layers at which pile tip rest = 10 th
Layer- 10
Layer at Which pile rest (Soil / Rock) = SOIL
RL of the Layers = 93.366 90.366 87.366 84.366 81.366 78.366 75.366 72.366 69.366 66.366
Depth of layers from G.L. = 3.000 6.000 9.000 12.000 15.000 18.000 21.000 24.000 27.000 30.000
Depth from Scour/Cutoff Level Layer - 1 Layer - 2 Layer - 3 Layer - 4 Layer - 5 Layer - 6 Layer - 7 Layer - 8 Layer - 9 Layer-10
EffectiveDepth of layers h 0.158 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 1.842
Density of soil in g/cm3 or t/m3 γ 2.000 2.036 2.033 2.039 2.043 2.062 2.045 2.056 2.047 2.062
Effective Unit weight of soil (Yeff.) Yeff. 1 1.036 1.033 1.039 1.043 1.062 1.045 1.056 1.047 1.062
For Cohesionless soils
Bearing capacity factor (Ny) 0.571 0.508 0.449 0.449 0.781 1.442 1.562 1.689 1.969 2.123
Bearing capacity factor (Nq) 1.716 1.64 1.568 1.568 1.966 2.71 2.839 2.974 3.264 3.421
Coeff. Of earth pressure K 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5
Angle of wall friction between soil & pile δ 6 5.5 5 5 7.5 11 11.5 12 13 13.5
Angle of internal friction φ 6.0 5.5 5.0 5.0 7.5 11.0 11.5 12.0 13.0 13.5
For Cohesive soils
Bearing capacity factor Nc 6.81 6.65 6.49 6.49 7.34 8.80 9.04 9.29 9.81 10.08
Average Cohesion at pile tip Cp 3.6 3.85 4.8 5.1 5.5 5.8 5.9 5.8 5.6 5.4
Avg. Cohesion throughout length of pile C 3.60 3.85 4.80 5.10 5.50 5.80 5.90 5.80 5.60 5.40
Reduction factor α 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Calculation
Surface area of pile stem Asi 0.596 11.310 11.310 11.310 11.310 11.310 11.310 11.310 11.310 6.944
Effective overburden pressure PDi 0.079 1.712 4.816 7.924 11.047 14.204 17.365 20.516 23.671 26.219
K.PDi.tan(δ).Asi = 0.007 2.797 7.147 11.760 24.672 46.839 59.933 73.979 92.707 65.567
α.C.ASi = 1.072 21.771 27.143 28.840 31.102 32.798 33.364 32.798 31.667 18.749
KPDi tand Asi + α C As = 1.080 24.568 34.291 40.600 55.773 79.637 93.297 106.778 124.375 84.316
2
Cross sectional area of pile tip Ap 1.131 m
Eff. Overburden pressure PD 27.197 t/m2
End Bearing resistance {Ref. Appendix B of IS:2911 (Part I/Sec2) - 1979} Frictional resistance {Ref. Appendix B of IS:2911(Part I/Sec 2) - 1979}
Qu1 ={Ap(1/2* DYNY + PD Nq)} + {Ap Nc Cp} Qu2 = Sum1n ( KPDi tand Asi ) + ( a C As )
Point resistance = 168.3422 t Frictional Resistance = 644.71338 t
Total Ultimate resistence, Qu=(Qu1+Qu2) = 813.05558 t (Frictional Resistance due to sand is ignored as the pile is resting on wethrd. rock)
Safe load on pile (Normal Case) = 325.0 t Uplift Load Capacity of Pile (Normal Case)= 258.00 t
217
Forces on Pile ( Dry/LWL Condition) - For design of pile only

Pile-3 Pile-4 Vertical capacity of pile = 325 T
Maximum moment allowed per pile 176.10 Tm
Long. Direction Lateral capacity of pile in seismic case = 69.23
Pile-5 Pile-6 Area of pile cap = 44.37 m2
Pile-1 Pile-2 1 51.84 ILL= 51.84 m4
0.5 19.44 ITT= 19.44 m4
Vert. Lat. Long. Trans. Load Upto Pile-1 Pile-2 Pile-5 Pile-6 Pile-3 Pile-4 Max Min Lat. Long.
1832.201 21.480 -31.103 458.475 305.367 15.636 292.04 286.285 323.88 318.123 355.72 349.962 355.721 286.285 3.580 11.384
Service Condition
1735.039 21.480 -57.784 401.982 289.173 15.636 282.24 271.544 310.16 299.459 338.08 327.374 338.075 271.544 3.580 11.384
675.042 27.120 246.866 11.668 112.507 15.636 104.48 150.191 105.29 151.001 106.10 151.812 151.812 104.475 4.520 14.373
One Span Dislodged
675.042 27.120 246.866 11.668 112.507 15.636 104.48 150.191 105.29 151.001 106.10 151.812 151.812 104.475 4.520 14.373
1832.201 23.622 -31.103 530.927 305.367 15.636 287.01 281.253 323.88 318.123 360.75 354.993 360.753 281.253 3.937 12.519
Wind-Span Intact
1735.039 23.622 -57.784 474.434 289.173 15.636 277.21 266.512 310.16 299.459 343.11 332.406 343.107 266.512 3.937 12.519
675.042 27.566 246.866 47.965 112.507 15.636 101.96 147.670 105.29 151.001 108.62 154.332 154.332 101.955 4.594 14.609
Wind-Span Dislodged
675.042 27.566 246.866 47.965 112.507 15.636 101.96 147.670 105.29 151.001 108.62 154.332 154.332 101.955 4.594 14.609
218
Vert. Lat. Long. Trans. Load Upto Pile-1 Pile-2 Pile-5 Pile-6 Pile-3 Pile-4 Max Min Lateral Long.
1299.764 289.938 1659.75 101.564 216.627 15.636 71.53 378.891 78.58 385.944 85.64 392.997 392.997 71.530 48.32 153.66
DN - Seis.-Span Intact
1278.051 289.406 1648.72 148.412 213.009 15.636 65.68 370.998 75.99 381.304 86.29 391.611 391.611 65.679 48.23 153.38
1212.296 289.938 1671.41 94.556 202.049 15.636 56.36 365.880 62.93 372.446 69.49 379.013 379.013 56.359 48.32 153.66
UP - Seis.-Span Intact
1191.295 289.406 1660.61 142.952 198.549 15.636 50.50 358.018 60.43 367.945 70.35 377.872 377.872 50.498 48.23 153.38
513.572 134.691 651.22 8.721 85.595 15.636 40.33 160.925 40.93 161.530 41.54 162.136 162.136 40.327 22.45 71.38
DN- Seis.- Span Dislodged
513.572 134.691 651.22 8.721 85.595 15.636 40.33 160.925 40.93 161.530 41.54 162.136 162.136 40.327 22.45 71.38
477.593 134.691 647.63 8.110 79.599 15.636 34.71 154.638 35.27 155.201 35.83 155.764 155.764 34.706 22.45 71.38
UP- Seis.- Span Dislodged
477.593 134.691 647.63 8.110 79.599 15.636 34.71 154.638 35.27 155.201 35.83 155.764 155.764 34.706 22.45 71.38
1299.764 289.523 -141.573 1925.25 216.627 15.636 111.67 85.457 245.37 219.155 379.07 352.853 379.070 85.457 48.25 153.44
1278.051 287.749 -147.706 1955.81 213.009 15.636 106.50 79.148 242.32 214.968 378.14 350.788 378.141 79.148 47.96 152.50
1212.296 289.523 -129.904 1918.25 202.049 15.636 96.50 72.446 229.71 205.658 362.93 338.869 362.925 72.446 48.25 153.44
1191.295 287.749 -135.824 1950.35 198.549 15.636 91.32 66.169 226.76 201.609 362.20 337.050 362.202 66.169 47.96 152.50
513.572 118.004 170.124 489.82 85.595 15.636 51.46 82.968 85.48 116.984 119.50 150.999 150.999 51.464 19.67 62.54
513.572 118.004 170.124 489.822 85.595 15.636 51.46 82.968 85.48 116.984 119.50 150.999 150.999 51.464 19.67 62.54
477.593 118.004 166.529 489.211 79.599 15.636 45.84 76.682 79.82 110.655 113.79 144.627 144.627 45.843 19.67 62.54
477.593 118.004 166.529 489.211 79.599 15.636 45.84 76.682 79.82 110.655 113.79 144.627 144.627 45.843 19.67 62.54
219
Forces on Pile ( Dry/LWL Condition) - For checking pile capacity

Pile-3 Pile-4
Pile-5 Pile-6 Depth of pile cap = 1.8 m
1 51.84 ILL= 51.84 m4
Pile-1 Pile-2
0.5 19.44 ITT= 19.44 m4
1335.019 14.320 -95.660 308.275 222.503 15.636 225.59 207.874 247.00 229.282 268.41 250.690 268.405 207.874 2.39 7.59
Service Condition
1270.244 14.320 -113.448 270.613 211.707 15.636 219.06 198.047 237.85 216.839 256.64 235.632 256.641 198.047 2.39 7.59
495.583 18.080 168.327 8.416 82.597 15.636 82.06 113.235 82.65 113.819 83.23 114.404 114.404 82.063 3.01 9.58
One Span Dislodged
495.583 18.080 168.327 8.416 82.597 15.636 82.06 113.235 82.65 113.819 83.23 114.404 114.404 82.063 3.01 9.58
1335.019 15.748 -95.660 356.576 222.503 15.636 222.24 204.520 247.00 229.282 271.76 254.044 271.759 204.520 2.62 8.35
Wind-Span Intact
1270.244 15.748 -113.448 318.914 211.707 15.636 215.70 194.692 237.85 216.839 260.00 238.986 259.995 194.692 2.62 8.35
495.583 18.377 168.327 32.614 82.597 15.636 80.38 111.554 82.65 113.819 84.91 116.084 116.084 80.383 3.06 9.74
Wind-Span Dislodged
495.583 18.377 168.327 32.614 82.597 15.636 80.38 111.554 82.65 113.819 84.91 116.084 116.084 80.383 3.06 9.74
Safe Safe Safe Safe
Safe
220
Vert. Lat. Long. Trans. Load Upto Pile-1 Pile-2 Pile-5 Pile-6 Pile-3 Pile-4 Max Min Lateral Long.
1299.764 289.938 1659.75 101.564 216.627 15.636 71.53 378.891 78.58 385.944 85.64 392.997 392.997 71.530 48.32 153.66
1278.051 289.406 1648.72 148.412 213.009 15.636 65.68 370.998 75.99 381.304 86.29 391.611 391.611 65.679 48.23 153.38
1212.296 289.938 1671.41 94.556 202.049 15.636 56.36 365.880 62.93 372.446 69.49 379.013 379.013 56.359 48.32 153.66
1191.295 289.406 1660.61 142.952 198.549 15.636 50.50 358.018 60.43 367.945 70.35 377.872 377.872 50.498 48.23 153.38
513.572 134.691 651.22 8.721 85.595 15.636 40.33 160.925 40.93 161.530 41.54 162.136 162.136 40.327 22.45 71.38
513.572 134.691 651.22 8.721 85.595 15.636 40.33 160.925 40.93 161.530 41.54 162.136 162.136 40.327 22.45 71.38
477.593 134.691 647.63 8.110 79.599 15.636 34.71 154.638 35.27 155.201 35.83 155.764 155.764 34.706 22.45 71.38
477.593 134.691 647.63 8.110 79.599 15.636 34.71 154.638 35.27 155.201 35.83 155.764 155.764 34.706 22.45 71.38
Safe Safe Safe Safe
Safe
1299.764 289.523 -141.573 1925.25 216.627 15.636 111.67 85.457 245.37 219.155 379.07 352.853 379.070 85.457 48.25 153.44
1278.051 287.749 -147.706 1955.81 213.009 15.636 106.50 79.148 242.32 214.968 378.14 350.788 378.141 79.148 47.96 152.50
1212.296 289.523 -129.904 1918.25 202.049 15.636 96.50 72.446 229.71 205.658 362.93 338.869 362.925 72.446 48.25 153.44
1191.295 287.749 -135.824 1950.35 198.549 15.636 91.32 66.169 226.76 201.609 362.20 337.050 362.202 66.169 47.96 152.50
513.572 118.004 170.124 489.82 85.595 15.636 51.46 82.968 85.48 116.984 119.50 150.999 150.999 51.464 19.67 62.54
513.572 118.004 170.124 489.822 85.595 15.636 51.46 82.968 85.48 116.984 119.50 150.999 150.999 51.464 19.67 62.54
477.593 118.004 166.529 489.211 79.599 15.636 45.84 76.682 79.82 110.655 113.79 144.627 144.627 45.843 19.67 62.54
477.593 118.004 166.529 489.211 79.599 15.636 45.84 76.682 79.82 110.655 113.79 144.627 144.627 45.843 19.67 62.54
Safe Safe Safe Safe
Safe
221
Design of Pile ( Dry/LWL Condition)

Case: Service Condition and Seismic in longitudinal Direction (Dry/LWL)

Hu= 48.32 T
Pu / fck * D2= 0.0068861
Mu / fck * D3= 0.0254069
As
d'/D= 0.0813

Check for shear

as per Cl.-40.2.2 of IS:456-2000.
Percentage of steel provided = 0.87 %
Tc= 0.6284 0.75 0.59
δTc= 0.6447384 1 0.67

i) 12 times dia. Of main bar 300 mm
Refer IRC:112-Cl-16.2.3(4) ii) Least lateral dimension 1200 mm
iii) 200 c/c 200 mm
Say 200 Safe
222
Forces on Pile ( HFL Condition) - For design of pile only

Pile-1 Pile-2 1 51.84 ILL= 51.84 m4
0.5 19.44 ITT= 19.44 m4
1818.800 21.872 -29.933 458.961 303.133 15.636 289.67 284.126 321.54 315.998 353.41 347.870 353.413 284.126 3.65 11.59
Service Condition
1721.638 21.872 -56.614 402.468 286.940 15.636 279.87 269.385 307.82 297.334 335.77 325.283 335.767 269.385 3.65 11.59
661.641 27.512 248.036 12.154 110.274 15.636 102.10 148.032 102.94 148.876 103.79 149.720 149.720 102.100 4.59 14.58
One Span Dislodged
661.641 27.512 248.036 12.154 110.274 15.636 102.10 148.032 102.94 148.876 103.79 149.720 149.720 102.100 4.59 14.58
1818.800 24.054 -29.933 533.499 303.133 15.636 284.49 278.949 321.54 315.998 358.59 353.047 358.590 278.949 4.01 12.75
Wind-Span Intact
1721.638 24.054 -56.614 477.006 286.940 15.636 274.69 264.208 307.82 297.334 340.94 330.459 340.943 264.208 4.01 12.75
661.641 27.985 248.036 49.574 110.274 15.636 99.50 145.433 102.94 148.876 106.39 152.319 152.319 99.501 4.66 14.83
Wind-Span Dislodged
661.641 27.985 248.036 49.574 110.274 15.636 99.50 145.433 102.94 148.876 106.39 152.319 152.319 99.501 4.66 14.83
223
1289.477 287.602 1658.73 101.564 214.913 15.636 69.91 377.082 76.96 384.135 84.02 391.188 391.188 69.910 47.93 152.42
1267.764 287.070 1647.71 148.412 211.294 15.636 64.06 369.189 74.37 379.496 84.67 389.802 389.802 64.059 47.84 152.14
1202.730 287.602 1670.40 94.556 200.455 15.636 54.86 364.191 61.43 370.758 67.99 377.324 377.324 54.858 47.93 152.42
1181.729 287.070 1659.59 142.952 196.955 15.636 49.00 356.329 58.93 366.257 68.85 376.184 376.184 48.998 47.84 152.14
503.285 132.355 650.21 8.721 83.881 15.636 38.71 159.116 39.31 159.721 39.92 160.327 160.327 38.707 22.06 70.15
DN - Span Dislodged
503.285 132.355 650.21 8.721 83.881 15.636 38.71 159.116 39.31 159.721 39.92 160.327 160.327 38.707 22.06 70.15
483.042 132.355 651.12 8.876 80.507 15.636 35.24 155.815 35.86 156.432 36.47 157.048 157.048 35.238 22.06 70.15
UP - Span Dislodged
468.027 132.355 646.61 8.110 78.004 15.636 33.21 152.949 33.77 153.512 34.33 154.075 154.075 33.206 22.06 70.15
1289.477 280.122 -141.573 1869.575 214.913 15.636 113.83 87.609 243.66 217.440 373.49 347.272 373.489 87.609 46.69 148.46
1267.764 278.348 -147.706 1900.125 211.294 15.636 108.65 81.301 240.61 213.254 372.56 345.207 372.560 81.301 46.39 147.52
1202.730 280.122 -129.904 1862.567 200.455 15.636 98.77 74.718 228.12 204.063 357.46 333.408 357.464 74.718 46.69 148.46
1181.729 278.348 -135.824 1894.665 196.955 15.636 93.59 68.441 225.17 200.015 356.74 331.589 356.741 68.441 46.39 147.52
502.740 112.208 170.124 461.445 83.790 15.636 51.63 83.134 83.67 115.179 115.72 147.223 147.223 51.629 18.70 59.47
DN - Span Dislodged
502.740 112.208 170.124 461.445 83.790 15.636 51.63 83.134 83.67 115.179 115.72 147.223 147.223 51.629 18.70 59.47
468.572 112.208 166.529 460.890 78.095 15.636 46.31 77.145 78.31 109.151 110.32 141.157 141.157 46.306 18.70 59.47
UP - Span Dislodged
468.572 112.208 166.529 460.890 78.095 15.636 46.31 77.145 78.31 109.151 110.32 141.157 141.157 46.306 18.70 59.47
224
Forces on Pile ( HFL Condition) - For checking pile capacity

Pile-2 1 51.84 ILL= 51.84 m4
Pile-1
0.5 19.44 ITT= 19.44 m4
1325.092 14.582 -36.605 310.080 220.849 15.636 218.34 211.562 239.87 233.096 261.41 254.629 261.408 211.562 2.43 7.73
Service Condition
1260.318 14.582 -54.393 272.417 210.053 15.636 211.81 201.735 230.73 220.653 249.64 239.571 249.643 201.735 2.43 7.73
485.656 18.341 169.107 8.740 80.943 15.636 80.31 111.630 80.92 112.237 81.53 112.844 112.844 80.314 3.06 9.72
One Span Dislodged
485.656 18.341 169.107 8.740 80.943 15.636 80.31 111.630 80.92 112.237 81.53 112.844 112.844 80.314 3.06 9.72
1325.092 16.036 -36.605 359.772 220.849 15.636 214.89 208.112 239.87 233.096 264.86 258.080 264.858 208.112 2.67 8.50
Wind-Span Intact
1260.318 16.036 -54.393 322.109 210.053 15.636 208.36 198.284 230.73 220.653 253.09 243.022 253.094 198.284 2.67 8.50
485.656 18.656 169.107 33.687 80.943 15.636 78.58 109.898 80.92 112.237 83.26 114.576 114.576 78.582 3.11 9.89
Wind-Span Dislodged
485.656 18.656 169.107 33.687 80.943 15.636 78.58 109.898 80.92 112.237 83.26 114.576 114.576 78.582 3.11 9.89
Safe Safe Safe Safe
Safe
225
1289.477 287.602 1658.73 101.564 214.913 15.636 69.91 377.082 76.96 384.135 84.02 391.188 391.188 69.910 47.93 152.42
1267.764 287.070 1647.71 148.412 211.294 15.636 64.06 369.189 74.37 379.496 84.67 389.802 389.802 64.059 47.84 152.14
1202.730 287.602 1670.40 94.556 200.455 15.636 54.86 364.191 61.43 370.758 67.99 377.324 377.324 54.858 47.93 152.42
1181.729 287.070 1659.59 142.952 196.955 15.636 49.00 356.329 58.93 366.257 68.85 376.184 376.184 48.998 47.84 152.14
503.285 132.355 650.21 8.721 83.881 15.636 38.71 159.116 39.31 159.721 39.92 160.327 160.327 38.707 22.06 70.15
DN - Span Dislodged
503.285 132.355 650.21 8.721 83.881 15.636 38.71 159.116 39.31 159.721 39.92 160.327 160.327 38.707 22.06 70.15
483.042 132.355 651.12 8.876 80.507 15.636 35.24 155.815 35.86 156.432 36.47 157.048 157.048 35.238 22.06 70.15
UP - Span Dislodged
468.027 132.355 646.61 8.110 78.004 15.636 33.21 152.949 33.77 153.512 34.33 154.075 154.075 33.206 22.06 70.15
Safe Safe Safe Safe
Safe
1289.477 280.122 -141.573 1869.575 214.913 15.636 113.83 87.609 243.66 217.440 373.49 347.272 373.489 87.609 46.69 148.46
1267.764 278.348 -147.706 1900.125 211.294 15.636 108.65 81.301 240.61 213.254 372.56 345.207 372.560 81.301 46.39 147.52
1202.730 280.122 -129.904 1862.567 200.455 15.636 98.77 74.718 228.12 204.063 357.46 333.408 357.464 74.718 46.69 148.46
1181.729 278.348 -135.824 1894.665 196.955 15.636 93.59 68.441 225.17 200.015 356.74 331.589 356.741 68.441 46.39 147.52
502.740 112.208 170.124 461.445 83.790 15.636 51.63 83.134 83.67 115.179 115.72 147.223 147.223 51.629 18.70 59.47
DN - Span Dislodged
502.740 112.208 170.124 461.445 83.790 15.636 51.63 83.134 83.67 115.179 115.72 147.223 147.223 51.629 18.70 59.47
468.572 112.208 166.529 460.890 78.095 15.636 46.31 77.145 78.31 109.151 110.32 141.157 141.157 46.306 18.70 59.47
UP - Span Dislodged
468.572 112.208 166.529 460.890 78.095 15.636 46.31 77.145 78.31 109.151 110.32 141.157 141.157 46.306 18.70 59.47
Safe Safe Safe Safe
Safe
226
Design of Pile ( HFL Condition)

Case: Service Condition and Seismic in longitudinal Direction(HFL)

Hu= 47.93 T
Pu / fck * D2= 0.0065885
Mu / fck * D3= 0.0252022
As
d'/D= 0.0813

Check for shear

as per Cl.-40.2.2 of IS:456-2000.
Percentage of steel provided = 0.87 %
Tc= 0.6284 0.75 0.59
δTc= 0.64411 1 0.67

iii) 200 c/c 200
Say 200 Safe
227
DESIGN OF PILE CAP edge of equ. Area
INPUT DATA
PIER
2.175 0.175 0.05
H1 1.8
5.1 0.15 8.7

3.6
Traffic Directio 0.75 Current Direction
Diameter of Longitudinal bar at bottom = 0.025 m

Diameter of Longitudinal bar at top = 0.016 m
Diameter of Transverse bar at bottom = 0.016 m
Diameter of Transverse bar at top = 0.016 m
No. of Leg used for shear reinforcement = 10 Nos.
Area of Long. bar at bottom of pile cap = 0.000491 sqm
Arera of Long. bar at top of pile cap = 0.000201 sqm
Arera of Trans. bar at bottom of pile cap = 0.000201 sqm
Area of Trans. bar at top of pile cap = 0.000201 sqm
Cover = 75 mm
Traffic Current
Width of pile cap parallel to 5.1 X 8.70 m
From the face of pier, Area of pile cap perpendicular to 0.8925 X 18.923 sqm
From the face of pier, C.G. of pile cap perpendicular to 0.0875 X 1.088 m
Thk. Of Pile cap = 1.80 m

Es= 200000 N/mm2
DESIGN LOAD Non. Seis. Seis.
Total load on outer pile= 334.000 377.36
Lever Arm of outer pile centre from pier shaft in transverse direction -0.575 -0.58
DESIGN FOR MOMENT (Longitudinal) Non. Seis. Seis.
Moment due to reaction from pile at pier face= (334*3*(2.175-0.75)) 1427.850 1613.214 tm
Moment due to weight of pile cap= -18.9225*1.8*2.5*1.0875 -92.60198 -92.60198 tm
Resultant Moment= 1427.85+-92.601984375 1335.248 1520.612 tm
Resultant moment per meter= 1335.248/8.7 153.477 174.783 tm
DESIGN FOR MOMENT (Transverse) Non. Seis. Seis.

Moment due to reaction from outer pile at pier face= 0 0 tm
Moment due to reaction from inner pile at pier face= 0 0 tm
Moment due to weight of pile cap= -0.351422 -0.351422 tm
Resultant Moment= 0.000 0.000 tm
Resultant moment per meter= 0 0 tm
228
Designing as Beam
Effective depth available for Long. Bottom Bar = 1.713 m
Effective depth available for Trans. Bottom Bar = 1.705 m
Width of beam considered b= 1m
2
def.= 0.611 Safe
Steel - Longitudial - Bottom

x/d= 0.048341 z= 1.678552 m
Spacing=0.000491 X 1000/0.002592 = 189 mm c/c
Say 150 mm c/c Safe
Steel - Longitudinal - Top

Minimum steel as per IRC:112 cl. 16.5.1.1 @ 0.072% (Half at Top) 0.001296 Sqm
2
Spacing= 0.00020106 X 1000/0.001296 = 155 mm c/c
Say 150 mm c/c Safe
Steel - Transverse - Bottom

x/d= 0 z= 1.713 m
Area of steel required Ast= 0 mm2 = 0 Sqm
Minimum steel as per IRC:112 cl. 16.5.1.1 @ 0.072% = 0.001296 Sqm
Spacing=0.000201 X 1000/0.001296 = 155 mm c/c
Say 150 mm c/c Safe
Steel - Transverse - Top

2
Minimum steel as per IRC:112 cl. 16.5.1.1 @ 0.072% (Half at Top) 0.001296 m
2
Spacing= 0.00020106 X 1000/0.001296 = 155 mm c/c
Say 150 mm c/c Safe
Provide 16 mm diameter bar at the face of cap all around 4 Nos

CHECK FOR SHEAR
a) One Way Shear critical section for shear is taken at deff from abutment face
Distance of eff. Section from face of pier = 1.713 m
Distance of centre of pile from the critical section = -0.2880 m
Rection contributing towards shear at section(307.2.5.4-21-2000) = 0
Shear force at critical section due to reaction from pile 0.000
229
Shear force at critical section due to weight of pile cap = 18.0873 t

Shear stress = V/Bd = 1.20 t/m2
100As/Bd= = 0.20 %
Tc= 0.33 0.15 0.29
kTc= 0.33 0.25 0.37

(Shear Reinforcement not required)
Vs=V-Tc*b*d= 0N
Provide 10 mm dia.10 legged stirrups , Area= 790 sqmm
Spacing= N.A.
No Shear Reinforcement is needed as per IS:456-2000 cl.-26.5.1.6
Provide 10 mm dia.10 legged stirrups , Area, Asv= 790 sqmm
spacing sv= 0.87*415*790/(1000*0.4)
Spacing required= 710 mm c/c
Provide 10 mm dia.10 legged stirrups , 300
b) Punching Shear (IRC112-2011,Cl.-10.4.5)
critical section for shear is taken at 2*deff from face of pile

Effective Depth at critical section d= 1.713 m
Distance of eff. Section from face of pile = 3.426 m
Distance of critical section from the centre of pile = 4.026 m
Shear force at critical section due to max load on pile = 377.360 t
Perimeter at critical section =2*3.14159*4.026/4+2*0.75 u= 7.824 m
p1= 0.02
K=1+sqrt(200/d)<=2 K= 1.34
vRd=0.12K(80p1fck)^1/3 Punching shear stress at control perimeter = 61.5 t/sqm
Resultant Shear from pile to pile cap VEd,red 377.360 t

vEd,red= VEd,red/ud = 28 t/sqm
Safe
230
DESIGN OF TRANSVERSE SEISMIC REACTION BLOCK
Outer GIRDER( Left Span)

Outer GIRDER ( Right Span)
Transverse Seismic
Reaction Block
Pedastal
Pier Shaft
0.90
0.80 Transverse Seismic

Reaction Block
1.100
DESIGN DATA
Ht. of Contact of Reaction Block with Girder (Neoprene Pad)= 0.2 m

Thickness of Reaction Block= 0.90 m
Longitudinal Width of Reaction Block= 1.10 m
Live Load Reaction at Pier including impact= 214.8 t
Dead Load Reaction at Pier (Left +Right Span)= 300 t
Total Reaction at Pier including impact= 515 t
Total Horizontal Load on one Reaction Block= 185.328 t
Height of Reaction force from Pier cap= 0.625 m
Dia. Of bar Stirrups Ah= 0.012 m
Dia. Of bar Stirrups Avf= 0.012 m
Dia. Of bar As= 0.025 m
Grage of Concrete= M 40
a= 0.63 m S= 0.9000 m d= 0.67 m b= 1.10 m
h= 0.9000 m Vu= 185.328 t d'= 0.84 m
231
Check for Design Method

a/d'= 0.746
< 1 Designed as Bracket
Check for Shear Strength
Vu/bd= 2.510 < 6 OK

Calculation of Direct Tension Reinforcement At
At= Hu/0.85*fsy
Where fsy=500, for Fe-500 steel
Where, Hu=1.7*Actual Hrizontal force >0.2*Vu
Hu= 37.0656 t
At= 0.000872 sqm
Calculation of Flexural Tension reinforcement Af
Af= [Vu*a+Hu(h-d')]/0.85*fsy*d
= 0.004146 sqm
Calculation of ShearFriction Reinforcement
Avf= Vu/0.85*fsy*u
= 0.003115 sqm
Provide 2 legged 12 φ 14Nos
Spacing = 79 mm c/c
From top of pier cap
Calculation of Total Primary Tensile Reinforcement As
As > (Af+At)= 0.005018 sqm
As >(2*Avf/3+At)= 0.002949 sqm
As >(0.04*fc/fsy)*b*d= 0.00236 sqm
As= Max of the above Three
As = 0.005018 sqm
Provide 25 φ 11Nos
Spacing = 78 mm c/c
Calculation of Horizontal Stirrups below As
Ah >0.5*Af 0.002073 sqm
Ah >0.333*Avf 0.001037 sqm
Ah= max. of the above Two
Ah = 0.002073 sqm
Provide in 1 Layer 2 legged 12 φ 10Nos
Spacing = 76 mm c/c
Provide this stirrups below As and within a depth of 2/3d'
0.90
d'
h(S)

Vu
0.80 2 legged 12 φ 10 in 1 Layer
a
25 φ 11
0 2 legged 12 φ 14
0
Transverse Direction
232
A) DESIGN OF LONGITUDINAL SEISMIC REACTION BLOCK
Longitudinal Seismic Reaction Block
X-Girder
Pier cap
Long. Girder
0.8
1.2 Longitudinal Seismic

Reaction Block
0.35
DESIGN DATA
Ht. of Contact of Reaction Block with Girder (Neoprene Pad)= 0.2 m
Transverse width of Reaction Block= 0.80 m
Length of Reaction Block= 0.3500 m
Live Load Reaction at Pier including impact= 0 Not considered (As per IRC-6)
Total load of superstructure (Left Span) 300 t
Total Reaction at Pier including impact= 300 t
Total Horizontal Load on one Reaction Block= 27 t
Height of Reaction force from Pier cap= 1.025 m
Diameter of main bar at Girder face= 0.020 m
Diameter of bar at outer face= 0.016 m
Diameter of shear reinforcement= 0.016 m
No. of Leg used for shear reinforcement= 2 Nos.
a= 1.025 m S= 0.8 d= 0.23 m b= 0.35 m
h= 0.8 Vu= 27.000 t d'= 0.29 m
Check for Design Method a/d'= 3.534

> 1.0 Designed as Cantilever
Area of bar at Girder Face = 0.000314 sqm
Area of bar at outer face = 0.000201 sqm
Cover = 40 mm
DESIGN MOMENT
Resultant Moment = 27.675 tm
Resultant moment per meter = 34.594 tm
Es= 200000 N/mm2
Designing as Beam M= 34.594
Width of beam considered b= 0.80 m

2
def.= 0.284 Safe
233
Steel required Designed as under reinforced section

a) Vertical Steel on Girder Face

x/d= 0.401494 z= 0.24989 m
Spacing=0.000314 X 1000/0.003182 = 99 mm c/c
Say 88 9Nos Safe
b) Provide Vertical Stirrups
Provide 0.06% steel of cross sectional area
Area of steel required = 0.06/100*B*H= = 0.000576 sqm
For 16 mm diameter bar spacing requred = 122 mm c/c
Provide 16 mm diameter bar = 83 mm c/c 4Nos Safe
CHECK FOR SHEAR

a) One Way Shear critical section for shear is taken at deff
Distance of eff. Section from face of pier = 0.3 t
Shear force at critical section due to reaction from pile = 27.000 t
Shear stress = V/Bd = 257.1 t/sqm
100As/Bd= = 3.4 %
Tc= 1.01 3.25 1.01
kTc= 1.01 3.25 1.01
Tc= kTc= 1.01 N/mm2 < 2.571 N/mm2
(Hence shear reinforcement is required)

Vs=V-Tc*b*d= 163950 N
Provide 16 mm dia.2 legged stirrups , Area= 402 Sqmm. Spacing Required= 140 mm c/c
Minimum shear reinforcement as per clause no. 26.5.1.6 of IS 456-2000
Provide 16 mm dia.2 legged stirrups , Area= 402
Spacing required= 0.87*415*402/(1000*0.4)= 360 mm c/c
Hence Provide 16 mm dia.2 legged stirrups ,at spacing= 137.5 mm c/c 9Nos Safe
0.3500
d'
h(S)

Vu
1.20 2 legged 16 φ 9 in 1 Layer
a
20 φ 9
680 2 legged 16 φ 4
0
Long. Direction
234
The following data are used to generate the drawings for the structure concerned
(Limit State Design)
Dimensions ara in mm and Levels are in Meter Load on Pile Horizontal Vertical
Formation Cap Lev. HFL Bed Top of Cap Scour Level Fnd. Lev. Non Seismic 4 269
101.511 99.724 99.064 96.366 95.324 94.762 67.524 Seismic/wind 49 393
H1 H2 h1 h2 h3 h4 h5 h6 No Of Piles
6187 27800 1787 3358 1042 1800 26000 0 6
p1 p2 p3 p4 p5 p6 p7(a) p d
1000 1000 1800 500 500 500 2300 50 1200
p7(b) 2300
GS CL CR w1 w2 w3 CLP SLP WL WB
2625 1350 1350 750 3600 3600 13200 8600 8700 5100
Grade of Concrete in Different Component

Pier Cap Pier Pile Fnd Seic. Blk. -- -- -- --
M 30 M 30 M 35 M 40 -- -- -- --
Long. Seismic Reaction Blk. Trans. Seismic Reaction Blk.

r7 r8 r9 r10 r11 r12
350 800 1200 1100 900 800
d1 d2 d3 d4 d5 d6 d7 d8 d9
30-T25 30-T25 4-T25 15-T12-200 2-T12-200 2L-T12-200 T12-300 T12-300 T12-300
30Nos 30Nos 4Nos 15Nos 2Nos 2 legged
T-25 T-25 T-25 T-12 T-12 T-12 T-12 T-12 T-12
200 mm c/c 200 mm c/c 200 mm c/c 300 mm c/c 300 mm c/c 300 mm c/c
Y Y Y Y Y
d10 d11 d12 d13 d14 d15 d16 d17 d18 d19
22-T25 11-T25 4-T16 11-T16 8-2L-T12 2L- T16-100 2L- T16-100 2L- T12-100 2L- T12-100 4-T16
22Nos 11Nos 4Nos 11Nos 8Nos 2 legged 2 legged 2 legged 2 legged 4
T-25 T-25 T-16 T-16 2 legged T-16 T-16 T-12 T-12 T-16
2-Layer Each of 11bar T-12 100 mm c/c 100 mm c/c 100 mm c/c 100 mm c/c
Long Seis. Block Trans Seis. Block

d20 d21 d22 d23 d24 d25 d26 d27 d28 d29
1-T20 9-T20 9-2L-T16 4-2L-T16 9-T10 1-T25 11-T25 10-2L-T12 14-2L-T12 11-T10
1Nos 9Nos 9Nos 4Nos 9Nos 1Nos 11Nos 10Nos 14Nos 11Nos
T-20 T-20 2 legged 2 legged T-10 T-25 T-25 2 legged 2 legged T-10
T-16 T-16 T-12 T-12
Pile/Raft Reinforcement
e8 e9 e10 e11 e12 e13 e14 e15
T-25 T-16 T-16 T-16 4Nos 10Nos 20Nos T-10
150 mm c/c 150 mm c/c 150 mm c/c 150 mm c/c T-16 T-10 T-25 200 mm c/c
300 mm c/c -
a1 a2 a3 a4 c1 c2 c3 c4 c5
0Nos 0Nos T-0 T-0 0Nos 0Nos 0Nos 0Nos 0Nos
T-0 T-0 0 mm c/c 0 mm c/c T-0 T-0 T-0 T-0 T-0
235
Hydraulic Calculation for Proposed HL RCC Bridge in Replacement of Existing Narrow & Damaged Bridge in Km. 143 of
NH-80 in the State of Bihar
1. DESIGN DISCHARGE BY AREA VELOCITY METHOD :
Calculation based on H.F.L. Condition at Bridge Site :
River Bed Slope = 0.0003946
n = 0.040 H.F.L. at Bridge Site = 99.038 m.
Chainage H.F.L. Bed Level Bed Level Difference Average of Length Area Difference of Perimeter
2
(m) (R.L. in m) Existing Modified (2-3) (m) (4) (m) (in m) (in m ) Bed Level(m) (in m)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0.000 99.038 96.675 96.675 2.363
8.000 99.038 96.697 96.697 2.341 2.352 8.000 18.816 0.022 8.000
11.000 99.038 96.722 96.722 2.316 2.329 3.000 6.985 0.025 3.000
20.000 99.038 96.374 96.374 2.664 2.490 9.000 22.410 0.348 9.007
25.000 99.038 96.366 96.366 2.672 2.668 5.000 13.340 0.008 5.000
30.000 99.038 96.492 96.492 2.546 2.609 5.000 13.045 0.126 5.002
34.000 99.038 96.764 96.764 2.274 2.410 4.000 9.640 0.272 4.009
37.000 99.038 97.054 97.054 1.984 2.129 3.000 6.387 0.290 3.014
49.000 99.038 97.373 97.373 1.665 1.824 12.000 21.894 0.319 12.004
55.000 99.038 97.349 97.349 1.689 1.677 6.000 10.062 0.024 6.000
Total, A = 122.580 Sqm. Total, P = 55.036 m.
R = A/P
Hence, R = 2.227 m. Therefore,Q (at Bridge Site Under H.F.L.Condition) :
2/3 1/2
V = 1/n x R x S Q=AxV
Hence, V = 0.847 m/sec Therefore, Q = 103.765 cumec
Calculation based on H.F.L. Condition at 135 m Up-Stream :
n = 0.040 H.F.L. at Up-Stream = 99.091 m.
(m) (R.L. in m) Existing Modified (2-3) (m) (4) (m) (m) (in m2) Bed Level(m) (m)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0.000 99.091 96.931 96.931 2.160
12.000 99.091 96.841 96.841 2.250 2.205 12.000 26.463 0.090 12.000
20.000 99.091 96.916 96.916 2.175 2.213 8.000 17.702 0.075 8.000
27.000 99.091 96.996 96.996 2.095 2.135 7.000 14.947 0.080 7.000
33.000 99.091 96.977 96.977 2.114 2.105 6.000 12.629 0.019 6.000
40.000 99.091 96.965 96.965 2.126 2.120 7.000 14.842 0.012 7.000
49.000 99.091 97.063 97.063 2.028 2.077 9.000 18.695 0.098 9.001
55.000 99.091 97.169 97.169 1.922 1.975 6.000 11.852 0.106 6.001
R = A/P
Hence, R = 2.130 m. Therefore,Q (at 135 m U/S Under H.F.L.Condition) :
V = 1/n x R2/3 x S1/2 Q=AxV
Hence, V = 0.822 m/sec Add 10 % for overtoping Therefore, Q = 105.855 cumec
236
Calculation based on H.F.L. Condition at 50 m Down-Stream:

n = 0.040 HFL at Down-Stream = 99.018 m.
Modified (R.L. in m) Existing Modified (2-3) (m) (4) (m) (m) (in m2) Bed Level(m) (m)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0.000 99.018 97.633 97.633 1.385
7.000 99.018 97.590 97.590 1.428 1.407 7.000 9.847 0.043 7.000
15.000 99.018 97.539 97.539 1.479 1.454 8.000 11.630 0.051 8.000
21.000 99.018 97.581 97.581 1.437 1.458 6.000 8.750 0.042 6.000
30.000 99.018 96.768 96.768 2.250 1.844 9.000 16.594 0.813 9.037
36.000 99.018 97.147 97.147 1.871 2.061 6.000 12.365 0.379 6.012
43.000 99.018 97.658 97.658 1.360 1.616 7.000 11.310 0.511 7.019
50.000 99.018 97.542 97.542 1.476 1.418 7.000 9.928 0.116 7.001
55.000 99.018 97.552 97.552 1.466 1.471 5.000 7.356 0.010 5.000
R = A/P
Hence, R = 1.594 m. Therefore,Q (at 50 m D/S Under H.F.L.Condition) :
2/3 1/2
V = 1/n x R x S Q=AxV
Hence, V = 0.677 m/sec Add 10 % for overtoping Therefore, Q = 65.413 cumec
SUMMARY OF DISCHARGE BY DIFFERENT METHODS
1. By Area Velocity Method :
a. At Bridge Site 103.765 cumec
b. At 135 m Up-Stream 105.855 cumec
c. At 50 m Down-Stream 65.413 cumec
Hence, Qmax = 105.855 cumec
DESIGN DISCHARGE
Max. Discharge out of the above three methods found to be :
Qmax = 105.855 cumec
Hence, the Design Discharge through the Bridge :
QDesign = 106 cumec
CALCULATION OF WATERWAY REQUIRED
Effective linear waterway or the Regime width as per IRC-5: 1970 Clause No. 104.3 and Article 8.3 of SP-13
Waterway required or Regime width or Effective linear waterway :
Regime Width, W = C x Q0.5
Where, W = Regime Width in m
Q = Design Discharge in cumec = 106.000
C = A Constant = 4.800
Therefore, W= 49.419 m.
CALCULATION OF SCOUR DEPTH
Restricting Regime width by 19% waterway required = 40.03
Span arragement proosed=3 x 14 Overall Span = 43.870 m.
Restriction in waterway due to pier shaft and foundation cap
Element Height Width Weighted width
Pier shaft 3.064 1 3.064
Foundation Cap 0 5.1 0
Obstruction due to each pier = 1.000 m.
Obstruction due of both abutment = 1.000 m.
Providing Waterway =3 x (14 + 0.60) + 0.04 - (3 - 1) x 1 - 1 = 40.840 m.
237
As per IRC - 78: 2000 Clause No. 703.3.1.1

To provide for an adequate margin of safety, scour for foundation shall be designed for a larger discharge which should be a percent over the
design discharge. This percentage may be 30% for catchment area upto 3000 Km2
Hence, Design Discharge will become, Q = 1.30 x Qdesign
So, Q = 137.61 cumec
As per clause 703.2.2.1 of IRC:78 - 2000
Mean Depth of Scour, dsm = 1.34 x (Db2/Ksf)1/3
Where, Db = Design Discharge per m width = 3.370 cumec
Ksf = silt factor = 2.74
Hence,dsm= 2.151 m.
Again as per clause 703.2.3.1 of IRC:78 - 2000
For design of Pier & Abutment located in straight reach having individual foundation without floor protection work following maximum depth of
scour shall be adopted :
1. In the vicinity of Pier = 2 x dsm = 4.302 m.
2. Near the Abutment = 1.27 x dsm= 2.732 m.
AFFLUX CALCULATION
By Moleworth Formula (Refer Pocket Book of Bridge Engineers(2000 Edition) ; Page 26,Clause 2.2.7)
H = (V2/17.88+0.015) x ((A/a)2-1)
Where, H = Afflux in m
V = Av. velocity in unobstructed stream(m/sec) = 0.847
2
A = Unobstructed sectional area of the stream at proposed site(in m ) = 49.419
a = Constricted sectional area of the stream at the bridge site(in m2) = 40.840
Therefore,H = 0.026 m.
The above positive sign shows that there is rise in the HFL. due to Afflux by 0.026 m.
Hence the H.F.L. for design of bridge (as R.L.) = 99.064 m.
238
Hydraulic Calculation for Proposed HL RCC Bridge in Replacement of Existing Narrow & Damaged Bridge in Km. 143 of NH-80 in the State of Bihar
HFL Bed Level

Cross Section of Channel at Bridge Site
103.000
102.000
101.000
Reduced Level (in m)
100.000
99.000
98.000
97.000
97.373
97.349
97.054
96.675
96.722
96.764
96.697
96.000
96.374
96.492
96.366
95.000
94.000
93.000
92.000
91.000
90.000
0
11
20
25
30
34
37
49
55
Chainage (in m)
239
HFL Bed Level

Cross Section of the Channel at 135 m U/S
103.000
102.000
101.000
100.000
99.000
98.000
97.000
96.000
95.000
94.000
93.000
92.000
91.000
90.000
0
12
20
27
33
40
49
55
Chainage (in m)
240
HFL Bed Level

Cross Section of the Channel at 50 m D/S
103.000
102.000
101.000
100.000
99.000
98.000
97.000
96.000
95.000
94.000
93.000
92.000
91.000
90.000
0
15
21
30
36
43
50
55
Chainage (in m)
241
HFL Bed Level

Long Section of the Channel
103.000
102.000
101.000
100.000
99.000
98.000
97.000
96.000
95.000
94.000
93.000
92.000
91.000
90.000
Bridge Site
U/S Site
D/S Site
Chainage (in m)
242
Sub-Soil Investigation Report
Geotechnical Investigation For Proposed Bridge in Km. 143 of NH-80 in the

State of Bihar
1.1 Introduction
The objective of sub surface exploration is to determine the characteristics of the existing
Geo-materials in the zone of influences of the proposed bridge site in such a way as to
establish the design parameters which influence the choice and design details of foundation
types. Sub surface exploration for the proposed Bridge in Km. 143 of NH-80 is essential for
design of foundations for proposed spans of the bridge. The bore hole were sunk upto the
depth as mentioned in the following table.
1.2 Methodology
1.2.1 Field Operation
1.2.1.1 Boring
Boring was done by Auger operated manually upto the depth of water table and thereafter by
rotary method collecting mud slurry as per IS. 1892-1972. In this method boring is advanced
by a cutter fixed to drill rods, which are operated by means of pipe wrench. Bentonite slurry
is continuously pushed by a double piston pump through the GI pipe upto the cutting level to
prevent the collapse of the Bore holes. The slurry flowing to the bottom of the cutter mixes
with cut soil and flows to the surface and the soil is settled in the settling pit and the same
mud slurry is reused. The drilling rod attached with diamond bit is lowered slowly with the
help of manually operated winch fixed with the tripod. Seamless flush jointed steel casings of
150mm. internal diameter were used to prevent any caving of the bore hole and were inserted
simultaneously with the advancement of boring
1.2.1.2 Standard Penetration Test
During sinking of bore holes, Standard Penetration Tests were conducted as per IS. 2131-
1981 at regular intervals of 1.5m. The split spoon sampler was of standard design as per IS.
9640-1980, the outer and inner diameter being 50.8mm. and 38mm. respectively. The SPT
were conducted by driving a hammer of weight 63.5 kg. falling freely on jarring block
connected to the drill rod from a height of 750 mm. Nos. of blows required for the penetration
of 0 to 150mm., 150mm to 300mm. and 300mm. to 450mm. were noted. The No. of blows
required for the penetration from 150mm.to 450mm. was taken as N value. Since soft and
hard rock was found, diamond bits were connected with drill rods.
Representative disturbed samples were collected through split spoon sampler and sealed in
polithene bags with proper identification marks. Undisturbed samples could not be collected
due to cohesion less soil. Rock drilling information and observations were recorded as per IS
4464-1985 & 5313-1980 in field log bore data sheet. Rock coring samples were obtained in a
core barrel sampler of 1.50m. length and 100 to 150mm dia with a diamond bit at its cutting
end by rotary drilling. Samples so obtained were sent to laboratory for determination of
Engineering Properties, general identification and classification. Water table was observed
after 24 hours of completion of bore holes. Rate of penetration, water loss and color of water
were also observed during drilling.
The no. & location of Bore holes with the termination depth are shown in the following table.
243
Bore hole No. / Termination Depth Date of Commencement Date of Completion

Location in m.
1 30.00 04.09.2016 05.09.2016
2 30.00 02.09.2016 03.09.2016
Field Bore log data sheet showing different strata and Standard Penetration Test N value are
enclosed.
1.3 Laboratory Test
The following laboratory tests were carried out on disturbed and undisturbed soil
samples for identification and classification properties and for determination of shear
strength parameters and to obtain other properties of sub surface formation as per
relevant IS Codes as indicated below and tabulated.
a. Natural Moisture Content Determination [IS : 2720 (Part-2)-1973]

b. Bulk and Dry Density Determination.
c. Atterberg Limit Tests (LL & PL Test) [IS : 2720 (Part-5)-1985]
d. Specific Gravity Test [IS : 2720 (Part-3)-1980]
e. Sieve Size Analysis [IS : 2720 (Part-4)-1985]
f. Direct Shear Test on representative disturbed sample [IS : 2720 (Part-13)-
1986]
g. Unconsolidated Undrained Triaxial Compression Test on UDS [IS:2720
(Part-11)-1971]
h. Consolidation Test to determine Compression Index [IS: 2720 (Part-15)-1986]
The details of different layers of soil encountered in different boreholes are
furnished in the following table on the basis of visual observation, soil classification
and Standard Penetration Values.
Location-B.H.No. 1
0.00 – 7.00 CI Stiff brownish grey sandy silty clay
7.00 – 19.00 CI Very stiff brownish grey sandy silty clay
Location-B.H.No. 2
6.80 – 20.00 CI Very stiff yellowish brown sandy silty clay
Hard brownish yellow sandy silty clay with
20.00 – 30.00 CI
kankar
On close scrutiny of field and laboratory test results it reveals that soil is mainly sandy silty
clay upto entire depth.
1.4 Recommendation
Pile Foundation is suggested.
The Detailed Sub-Soil Investigation Data and Result is presented on next pages
244
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR THE PROPOSED BRIDGE IN REPLACEMENT OF

EXISTING NARROW & DAMAGED BRIDGE IN 143th Km. OF NH-80 IN THE STATE OF
BIHAR
FIELD BORE LOG DATA SHEET
Bore Hole No. : 1/A Dia. of the Bore Hole : 150 mm.
Method of Boring : Rotary GWT : 1.600 m.
Commencement Date : 04.09.2016 Completion Date : 05.09.2016
Depth Description Symbol Depth SPT N-Value Type of Remarks
(In m.) 0-15 15-30 30-45 sample
Stiff brownish grey sandy silty clay
1.50 2 4 5 9 SPT
3.00 3 4 6 10 SPT
7.00m.
4.00 - - - - UDS
6.00 4 7 8 15 SPT
Very stiff brownish grey sandy silty 9.00 6 8 10 18 SPT

clay
10.00 - - - - UDS
12.00 7 10 12 22 SPT
19.00m.
15.00 9 12 15 27 SPT
16.00 - - - - UDS
18.00 10 13 16 29 SPT
Hard brownish grey sandy silty 21.00 13 17 21 38 SPT

clay
22.00 - - - - UDS
30.00m. 24.00 13 18 23 41 SPT
27.00 15 20 26 46 SPT
30.00 18 24 28 52 SPT
SPT - Standard Penetration Tests UDS - Undisturbed Samples
245
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR THE PROPOSED BRIDGE IN REPLACEMENT OF

EXISTING NARROW & DAMAGED BRIDGE IN 143th Km. OF NH-80 IN THE STATE OF
BIHAR
FIELD BORE LOG DATA SHEET
Bore Hole No. : 2/P Dia. of the Bore Hole : 150 mm.
Method of Boring : Rotary GWT : 0.000 m.
Commencement Date : 02.08.2016 Completion Date : 03.08.2016
Depth Description Symbol Depth SPT N-Value Type of Remarks
(In m.) 0-15 15-30 30-45 sample
Stiff brownish grey sandy silty clay
1.00 - - - - UDS
1.50 2 3 5 8 SPT
3.00 3 3 6 9 SPT
6.80m.
4.00 - - - - UDS
6.00 6 7 10 17 SPT
7.00 - - - - UDS
Very stiff yellowish brown sandy

silty clay
9.00 7 9 11 20 SPT
10.00 - - - - UDS
12.00 7 10 11 21 SPT
20.00m.
15.00 8 13 15 28 SPT
16.00 - - - - UDS
18.00 9 13 17 30 SPT
21.00 11 15 20 35 SPT
Hard brownish yellow sandy silty
clay with kankar
22.00 - - - - UDS
24.00 12 17 22 39 SPT
30.00m.
27.00 13 18 23 41 SPT
30.00 16 20 25 45 SPT
SPT - Standard Penetration Tests UDS - Undisturbed Samples

246
LABORATORY TEST RESULT

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR THE PROPOSED BRIDGE IN REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING NARROW & Table No. 1
143th Km. of NH-80
DAMAGED BRIDGE IN 143th Km. OF NH-80 IN THE STATE OF BIHAR Bore Hole No. 1/A
Particle Size Distribution (%age of Finer) Atterberg Limit NMC Shear Strength Parameter Consolidation
Type of soil as per

Sand (in %) Cohesion
Type of Sample
Specific Gravity
Characteristics
IS:1498-1970
Bulk Density
Depth (in m)
Dry Density
Silt Factor
Void ratio
C
(gm/c3)
(gm/c3)
Medium Sand
Coarse Sand
N NII
Fine Sand
F
Gravel
Kg./cm2
Clay
Silt
LL PL PI (degree) Cc
1.50 SPT 9 9 CI - 1.00 2.35 5.30 32.84 58.51 3.22 40.0 20.0 20.0 25.5 1.97 1.57 2.72 0.73 0.375 5.00 0.279
3.00 SPT 10 10 CI - 1.55 3.32 7.77 23.85 63.51 3.23 42.0 20.0 22.0 24.9 1.95 1.56 2.72 0.74 0.380 4.50 0.293
4.00 UDS - - CI - 2.13 3.45 6.27 22.70 65.45 3.24 43.0 20.0 23.0 25.4 1.96 1.57 2.71 0.73 0.385 4.00 0.300
6.00 SPT 15 15 CI 1.40 2.15 3.07 6.38 23.65 63.35 3.25 42.5 21.0 21.5 25.2 1.98 1.58 2.71 0.71 0.390 5.00 0.296
9.00 SPT 18 17 CI 2.00 2.37 2.67 7.56 26.23 59.17 3.26 42.0 21.0 21.0 24.7 2.01 1.61 2.71 0.68 0.395 5.00 0.293
10.00 UDS - - CI 2.28 2.42 3.08 6.92 25.60 59.70 - 41.5 21.0 20.5 24.3 2.02 1.62 2.71 0.67 0.400 5.50 0.289
12.00 SPT 22 19 CI 1.65 2.15 3.36 7.85 26.58 58.41 - 43.0 20.0 23.0 24.5 2.02 1.62 2.71 0.67 0.450 6.50 0.300
15.00 SPT 27 21 CI 3.70 2.40 4.55 10.32 24.80 54.23 - 42.0 21.0 21.0 24.2 2.03 1.64 2.70 0.65 0.480 7.00 0.293
16.00 UDS - - CI 2.20 2.35 4.60 9.12 25.70 56.03 - 42.5 20.0 22.5 24.4 2.05 1.65 2.70 0.64 0.475 7.50 0.296
18.00 SPT 29 22 CI 3.05 2.60 3.75 9.25 26.55 54.80 - 43.0 20.0 23.0 23.8 2.04 1.65 2.70 0.64 0.520 10.00 0.300
21.00 SPT 38 27 CI 1.88 2.12 3.45 11.30 27.20 54.05 - 41.5 21.0 20.5 23.5 2.03 1.65 2.70 0.64 0.500 10.50 0.289
22.00 UDS - - CI 3.28 2.42 4.75 12.28 26.30 50.97 - 40.0 20.0 20.0 23.3 2.04 1.66 2.70 0.63 0.550 12.00 0.279
24.00 SPT 41 28 CI 2.30 2.15 4.60 11.26 24.68 55.01 - 43.0 20.0 23.0 22.9 2.05 1.67 2.70 0.62 0.650 12.00 0.300
27.00 SPT 46 31 CI 3.25 2.70 4.56 12.08 26.23 51.18 - 42.0 20.0 22.0 22.5 2.04 1.67 2.70 0.62 0.640 13.50 0.293
30.00 SPT 52 34 CI 2.80 2.65 4.46 11.55 25.80 52.74 - 41.5 20.0 21.5 22.2 2.05 1.68 2.70 0.61 0.700 13.00 0.289
247
LABORATORY TEST RESULT

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR THE PROPOSED BRIDGE IN REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING NARROW & Table No. 1
143th Km. of NH-80
DAMAGED BRIDGE IN 143th Km. OF NH-80 IN THE STATE OF BIHAR Bore Hole No. 2/P
Particle Size Distribution (%age of Finer) Atterberg Limit NMC Shear Strength Parameter Consolidation
Type of soil as per

Sand (in %) Cohesion
Type of Sample
Specific Gravity
Characteristics
IS:1498-1970
Bulk Density
Depth (in m)
Dry Density
Silt Factor
Void ratio
C
(gm/c3)
(gm/c3)
Medium Sand
Coarse Sand
N NII
Fine Sand
F
Gravel
Kg./cm2
Clay
Silt
LL PL PI (degree) Cc
1.00 UDS - - CI 2.89 1.03 3.32 4.20 32.55 56.01 2.74 43.5 20.0 23.5 26.7 1.98 1.56 2.72 0.74 0.320 6.00 0.303
1.50 SPT 8 8 CI 2.45 1.29 2.58 3.86 30.70 59.12 2.79 43.0 20.0 23.0 26.9 2.01 1.58 2.72 0.72 0.350 5.50 0.300
3.00 SPT 9 9 CI 3.16 1.14 2.12 4.63 31.85 57.10 2.80 44.0 20.0 24.0 27.2 2.00 1.57 2.72 0.73 0.360 6.00 0.307
4.00 UDS - - CI 2.44 0.68 1.62 5.45 30.65 59.16 2.82 43.5 20.0 23.5 26.5 2.02 1.60 2.72 0.70 0.375 6.50 0.303
6.00 SPT 17 16 CI 1.96 1.05 1.84 4.93 32.75 57.47 2.94 43.0 20.0 23.0 26.2 2.04 1.61 2.71 0.68 0.385 5.50 0.300
7.00 UDS - - CI 2.55 2.07 2.26 4.60 34.80 53.72 2.88 42.5 21.0 21.5 25.5 2.02 1.61 2.71 0.68 0.420 5.00 0.296
9.00 SPT 20 18 CI 2.17 1.48 2.52 5.78 36.50 51.55 2.96 42.0 21.0 21.0 25.3 2.03 1.62 2.71 0.67 0.480 5.00 0.293
10.00 UDS - - CI 1.70 1.67 2.60 4.96 35.45 53.62 - 42.0 21.0 21.0 24.9 2.04 1.64 2.70 0.65 0.500 5.00 0.293
12.00 SPT 21 18 CI 1.95 2.02 2.32 6.05 34.30 53.36 - 41.5 21.0 20.5 24.6 2.04 1.64 2.70 0.65 0.510 5.00 0.289
15.00 SPT 28 22 CI 2.29 1.65 2.54 10.70 38.15 44.67 - 41.0 21.0 20.0 24.1 2.04 1.65 2.70 0.64 0.550 7.50 0.286
16.00 UDS - - CI 2.65 1.53 2.77 11.32 36.20 45.53 - 42.0 20.0 22.0 23.9 2.04 1.65 2.70 0.64 0.560 9.00 0.293
18.00 SPT 30 23 CI 3.25 1.64 2.84 13.29 35.40 43.58 - 42.0 20.0 22.0 23.7 2.06 1.67 2.70 0.62 0.580 11.00 0.293
21.00 SPT 35 25 CI 3.38 2.62 3.55 9.78 48.17 32.50 - 41.0 21.0 20.0 22.7 2.05 1.67 2.70 0.62 0.590 11.50 0.286
22.00 UDS - - CI 4.06 2.18 2.92 10.33 50.03 30.48 - 40.5 21.0 19.5 22.9 2.06 1.68 2.70 0.61 0.600 12.00 0.282
24.00 SPT 39 27 CI 3.63 2.67 3.28 12.65 44.22 33.55 - 40.0 21.0 19.0 22.6 2.06 1.68 2.70 0.61 0.580 12.00 0.279
27.00 SPT 41 28 CI 2.98 2.72 3.42 13.70 39.48 37.70 - 40.0 21.0 19.0 22.8 2.05 1.67 2.70 0.62 0.560 13.00 0.279
30.00 SPT 45 30 CI 4.15 2.46 2.92 12.68 41.49 36.30 - 39.0 21.0 18.0 22.2 2.06 1.69 2.70 0.60 0.540 13.50 0.272
248
7. Drawings Details: No. of

sheets
Typical Cross Sections and 10

other Miscellaneous
Drawing
Cross Section Drawings 13
249

Revised DPR NH-80 - 13-12-2016

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Revised DPR NH-80 - 13-12-2016

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR

ROAD CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT

Detailed Project Report

Prepared By : Transtek Engineers & Services Pvt. Ltd.

Detailed Project Report including Cost Estimate

2. Improvement Proposal and Design 15 – 28

3. General Abstract of Cost and Detailed Cost Estimate 29 – 45

4. Detailed Computation of Quantities Road and Bridge Work 46 - 86

5. Analysis of Rates 87 – 112

7. Drawings Details: Attached in Separate Volume No. of sheets

Plan and Profile Drawing 31

Typical Cross Sections and other Miscellaneous Drawing 10

Detailed Drawings for Proposed New Bridge in Km. 143 13

1.2 Authority and Plan

1.3 Introduction & Necessity

1.4 Existing Features of Project Section

1.4.1 Highway Alignment

1.5 Sub-grade Soil Investigation Report

1.6 Traffic Count Data

1.8 Materials for proposed Construction work

1.9 Specification & Test Result

1.12 Project Cost Estimate

1.13 Construction Programme

Name of work : Strengthening work of National Highway 80 from

Circle : N.H. Circle, Bhagalpur

Division : N.H. Division, Bhagalpur

Section : Sabour – Ramjanipur Section

Estimated cost : 83.415 Crores (including centages)

1.2 Authority and Plan:

1.3 Introduction & Necessity:

The DPR for Up-gradation, Geometric Improvement of NH-80 Stretch (Munger -

DPR for Up-gradation, Geometric improvement of NH-80 Stretch (Munger - Bhagalpur

Some of the Photographs of Project section is attached below for perusal

Image of road condition at Km.164 Image of road condition at Km. 166

Replacement of Damaged minor Arch Bridge in Km. 143

1.4 Existing Features of Project Section

1.4.1 Highway Alignment

1.4.2 Vertical Alignment

1.4.3 Existing Road Inventory

The summary of existing Road Inventory is presented in Table 1.1 below

Table 1.2: Built-up Area in the Project Section

1.4.4 Existing Road Crust in Project Section

The existing Road Crust in Project Section in Project Section is presented in

Existing Base & Sub- Surfacing Total Crust

1.4.5 Pavement Condition

Sl No From To Length Existing Remarks

16 147 147.6 600 Extremely Poor

Sl No From To Length Existing Remarks

30 156 157 1000 Poor Ravelling

1.4.6 Existing Bridges and CD Structures in Project Section

Table: 1.6 Details of Major Bridges in the Project Section

Table: 1.7 Details of Minor Bridges in the Project Section

Table 1.8 : Summary and condition of Existing Culverts

Table 1.9: Summary of Existing Culverts for Replacement

1.4.7 Rain / Flood Water Overtopping in the project Stretch

Flood Over-topping is reported in the entire project Section between Chainage

DPR for Up-gradation, Geometric improvement of NH-80 Stretch (Munger -

1.4.8 Utility Services

1.5 Sub-grade Soil Investigation Report :

Table 1.10: Sub-grade Soil Investigation Data

1.6 Traffic count Data

FAST MOVING VEHICLES SLOW MOVING VEHICLES

1.8 Land Acquisition Work

1.9 Materials for proposed Construction work: