Republic of the Philippines

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Caraga Administrative Region
DIVISION OF SURIGAO DEL SUR
Tago - I District
BADONG NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Junction Badong - Cabangahan, Tago, Surigao del Sur

OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

June 2015 - March 2016

Name of Employee: MARKY. SALAS Name of Rater: CYNTHIA S. ESPIRITU

Position: Teacher - I Position: Head Teacher - III/School Head
School: Badong National High School Date of Review:

TO BE FILLED UP DURING PLANNING TOB FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

KEY RESULT WEIGHT ACTUAL

MAJOR FINAL AREAS RESULTS
OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING SCORE
OUTPUTS
(KRAs) KRA Q E T
with clear financial management system for the school supported by evidences
5
such as reports, account logs, database system.
Manage school resources in with clear financial and resource management system but one or more
accordance with Deped 4
requirements were missing
policies and accounting rules 10% 3 3 3 3.00 0.30
and regulations and other with clear financial and resource management system but 2 reports or requirements
3
pertinent guideline. were lacking
2 financial management system and reporting were in its initial stages
1 no financial report
with clear financial management system for the school supported by evidences
School 5
such as reports, account logs, database system.
Leadership,
Management Utilize funds for approved with clear financial and resource management system but one or more
4
and Operation school programs and projects requirements were missing
5% 4 5 4 4.33 0.22
(20%) as reflected in the SIP/AIP. with clear financial and resource management system but 2 reports or requirements
3
were lacking
2 financial management system and reporting were in its initial stages
1 no financial report
5 submitted required reports five days or more before the set deadlines
Prepare financial
reports/liquidation reports and
submit/communicate the same 5% 4 4 4 4.00 0.20
to higher education authorities
and other education partners.
 School
Leadership,
Management
and Operation
(20%)
KEY RESULT WEIGHT ACTUAL
MAJOR FINAL AREAS RESULTS
OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING SCORE
OUTPUTS
(KRAs) KRA Q E T
Prepare financial
reports/liquidation reports and 4 submitted required reports four days before the set deadlines
submit/communicate the same 5% 3 submitted required reports three days before the set deadlines 4 4 4 4.00 0.20
to higher education authorities 2 submitted required reports two days before the set deadlines
and other education partners.
1 submitted required reports on the set deadlines
5 Attained 75% and above NAT MPS per subject area
4 Attained 65%-74% of NAT MPS per subject area.
Attain 75% MPS in NAT 15% 3 Attained 55%-64% of NAT MPS per subject area. 2 2 2 2.00 0.30
2 Attained 44%-54% of NAT MPS per subject area.
1 Attained 45% or below of NAT MPS per subject area.
5 zero drop-out
Instructional Monitor attendance of students 4 1%-3% drop-out
Leadership regularly and attain/maintain 10% 3 4%-6% drop-out 3 3 3 3.00 0.30
(40%) zero drop-out rate. 2 7%-9% drop-out
1 10%-above drop-out rate
5 100% fully implemented and functional instructional and supervisory plan
4 84%-99% implemented and functional instructional and supervisory plan
Improve instructional
15% 3 68%-83% implemented and functional instructional and supervisory plan 4 4 4 4.00 0.60
leadership practices.
2 52%-67 implemented and functional instructional and supervisory plan.
1 51%-below implemented and functional instructional and supervisory plan
5 100% of the teachers are observed and given clinical assistance
Provide clinical supervision to 4 84%-99% of the teachers are observed and given clinical assistance
teachers for the improvement 10% 3 68%-83% of the teachers are observed and given clinical assistance 2 3 4 3.00 0.30
of teaching-learning outcomes 2 52%-67 of the teachers are observed and given clinical assistance
1 51%-below of the teachers are observed and given clinical assistance
100% of the NCBTS-TSNA of teachers were consolidated and provided with an
5
Provision of action plan fully documented
Quality Basic 84%-99% of the NCBTS-TSNA of teachers were consolidated and provided with
4
Education an action plan fully documented
Human Create a school-based
68%-83% of the NCBTS-TSNA of teachers were consolidated and provided with
Resource professional learning 10% 3 2 2 2 2.00 0.20
an action plan fully documented
Management community.
and
Development
(25%)
 Provision of
Quality Basic
Education KEY RESULT WEIGHT ACTUAL
MAJOR FINAL AREAS Create OBJECTIVES
a school-based TIMELINE RESULTS
Human PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING SCORE
OUTPUTS professional learning 10% 2
Resource
(KRAs) KRA Q E2 T2 2.00 0.20
Management community.
52%-67 of the NCBTS-TSNA of teachers were consolidated and provided with an
and 2
action plan fully documented
Development
(25%) 1 51%-below of the NCBTS-TSNA of teachers were consolidated and provided with
an action plan fully documented
Conducted at least 4 INSET/GAD with 100% attendance of participants properly
5
documented
Conducted at least 3 INSET/GAD with 100% attendance of participants properly
4
documented
Organize and conducts
5% Conducted at least 2 INSET/GAD with 100% attendance of participants properly 5 5 5 5.00 0.25
INSETS/GAD Training. 3
documented
Conducted at least 1 INSET/GAD with 100% attendance of participants properly
2
documented
1 no training conducted

5 initiate/collaborate with stakeholders to put up a tangible project fully documented.

4 has stakeholders partnership/mobilization plan complete with reports.

Encourage stakeholders to
create safe, healthy and child-
10%
Parents friendly school environment for
Involvement student.
and
Community
Partnership
(15%)
Meet parents regularly to
confer/inform about school
5%
accomplishment and students
progress.
Attain five of the following:
1. Serve as resource speaker at
least in the District level.
has mobilization plan and occasionally meets stakeholders in meetings and
3
activities but some elements are not enough resources raised 2 2 4 2.67 0.27
has mobilization plan and occasionally meets stakeholders but not resulting to
2
resources generated and evidences are missing
has no mobilization plan and seldom meets with stakeholders but not resulting to
1
resources generated and evidences missing.
5 4 meetings attended and conducted within the school year with documentation.
4 3 meetings attended and conducted within the school year with documentation.
3 2 meetings attended and conducted within the school year with documentation. 3 5 3 3.67 0.18
2 1 meeting attended and conducted within the school year with documentation.
1 conducted meetings but not documented
5 Attained 5 indicators with documents
4 Attained 4 indicators with documents

2. Serve as chairman in any

working technical committees.
3 Attained 3 indicators with documents

Plus Factor
5% 2 2 2 2.00 0.10
5%
 KEY RESULT WEIGHT ACTUAL
MAJOR FINAL AREAS RESULTS
OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING SCORE
OUTPUTS
(KRAs) KRA Q E T
3. Conducts one income
generating project properly 2 Attained 2 indicators with documents
Plus Factor implemented with documentation.
5% 2 2 2 2.00 0.10
5%
4. Conducts an action
1 Attained 1 indicator with documents
research/innovation.
5.Organize/maintain one socio-
cultural group.
6. Publish article in national
circulation.
7. Acquire title of school site.

TOTAL (Excluding Plus Factor) 100% OVER - ALL RATING OF ASSESSMENT 3.22

Plus Factor 5% ADJECTIVAL RATING Satisfactory

Adjectival Rating Scale
Outstanding 4.500 5.000 Ratee: Rater:
Very Satisfactory 3.500 4.499
Satisfactory 2.500 3.499 CYNTHIA S. ESPIRITU, HT - III CYNTHIA O. ACEVEDO
Unsatisfactory 1.500 2.499 School Head Public School District Supervisor
Poor 1.000 1.499
 Republic of the Philippines
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Caraga Administrative Region
DIVISION OF SURIGAO DEL SUR
Tago - I District
BADONG NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Junction Badong - Cabangahan, Tago, Surigao del Sur

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) FOR MASTER TEACHERS
June 2015 - March 2016

Name of Employee: MARKY. SALAS Name of Rater: CYNTHIA S. ESPIRITU

Position: Teacher - I Position: Head Teacher - III/School Head
School: Badong National High School Date of Review:

TO BE FILLED UP DURING PLANNING TOB FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

KEY RESULT WEIGHT ACTUAL

MAJOR FINAL AREAS RESULTS
OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING SCORE
OUTPUTS
(KRAs) KRA Q E T
5 200 or more updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way
Write lesson plans/logs based 4 150-199 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way
on the standards-based 5% 3 90-149 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way 3 3 3 3.00 0.15
curriculum guides daily. 2 60-89 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way
1 1-59 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way
Facilitate learning through the 5 10 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate and updated
use of written/computerized 4 8 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate and updated
lesson plans, modules, 3 6 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate and updated
teaching guides, and other 5% 4 5 4 4.33 0.22
learning resources with the 2 4 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate and updated
adequate and updated 1 2 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate and updated
instructional materials. (Supported with write-up and documentation)
Teaching 5 100% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed
Learning Initiate discipline of students 4 85%-99% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed
Process (20%) including classroom rules, 5% 3 70%-84% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed 4 4 4 4.00 0.20
guidelines and individual and
group task. 2 55%-69% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed
 Teaching
Learning Initiate discipline of students
Process (20%) including classroom rules, 5% 4 4 4 4.00 0.20
guidelines and individual and
group task.
1 54% and below of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed
100% of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and submitted every last
5
day of the month
Monitor attendance, diversity 85%-99% of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and submitted
appreciation, safe, positive and 4
every last day of the month
motivating environment, over-
70%-84% of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and submitted
all physical atmosphere, 5% 3 2 3 5 3.33 0.17
every last day of the month
cleanliness, and orderliness of
classrooms including proper 55%-69% of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and submitted
2
waste disposal. every last day of the month
54% and below of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and
1
submitted every last day of the month
Indicators:
Monitor, evaluate and maintain
1. Test Questions with TOS
pupil’s/student’s progress
through 2. Class Record (with dates of quizzes, assignments, projects, portfolio,
etc.)
*Assessment for Learning 3. Rating sheets
4. List of pupil’s/student’s output like projects, activities done/performed,
(Formative)
3% etc. 2 2 2 2.00 0.06
All indicators were prepared and submitted two weeks before the scheduled due
*Assessment as Learning 5
time
(Reflective) 4 3 indicators were prepared and submitted one week before the scheduled time
*Assessment of Learning 3 2 indicators were prepared and submitted on the scheduled date
(Summative) 2 1 indicator was prepared and submitted on the scheduled date
*Periodic Test 1 no indicator was prepared and submitted on the scheduled date.
5 100% pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully
Conduct 4 85%-99% pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully
remediation/enrichment
3% 3 70%-84% pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully 3 3 3 3.00 0.09
programs to improve
performance indicators 2 55%-69% pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully
1 54% and below pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully
100% of the pupils/students records were prepared and submitted before the
5
scheduled time without error
85%-99% of the pupils/students records were prepared and submitted on or before
4
the scheduled time without error
Maintain pupil’s/students 70%-84% of the pupils/students records were prepared and submitted on or before
3% 3 4 4 4 4.00 0.12
school records the scheduled time with minimal error
 Maintain pupil’s/students
3% 4 4 4 4.00 0.12
school records
55%-69% of the pupils/students records were prepared and submitted one week
2
after the due time
54% and below of the pupils/students records were prepared and submitted two
1
weeks before the due time
85% and above of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required learning
5
competency.
82-84% of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required learning
4
competency
Attain the required GSA for 79%-81% of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required learning
3% 3 4 4 4 4.00 0.12
Grade level and learning areas competency
76%-78% of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required learning
2
competency
75% of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required learning
1
competency
5 Attained 75% and above NAT MPS per subject area
Attain 75% MPS per subject 4 Attained 65%-74% of NAT MPS per subject area.
area in the National 3% 3 Attained 55%-64% of NAT MPS per subject area. 3 3 3 3.00 0.09
Students' Achievement Test 2 Attained 44%-54% of NAT MPS per subject area.
Learning 1 Attained 45% or below of NAT MPS per subject area.
Outcomes
initiated at least one successful instructional program to 100% of the teachers with
(30%) 5
full documentation.
initiated at least one successful instructional program and involved 84%-99% of the
4
teachers with full documentation.
Initiate improvements in
3% initiated at least one successful instructional program and involved 63%-83% of the 3 4 4 3.67 0.11
instructional programs 3
teachers with full documentation.
initiated at least one successful instructional program and involved 52%-62% of the
2
teachers with full documentation.
1 no evidence of initiating instructional program.
lead 100% of the teachers in preparing innovative instructional materials within a
5
year with full documentation.
lead 84%-99%% of the teachers in preparing innovative instructional materials
4
within a year with full documentation.
Lead in the preparation of
3% lead 68%-83% of the teachers in preparing innovative instructional materials within 4 2 3 3.00 0.09
instructional materials. 3
a year with full documentation.
lead 52%-67% of the teachers in preparing innovative instructional materials within
2
a year with full documentation.
1 no evidence of leading in preparation of instructional program.
 Excellent execution of the lesson plan and excellent mentoring services provided to
5
the demonstration teacher
Very Satisfactory execution of the lesson plan and Very Satisfactory mentoring
Serve as demonstrator 4
services provided to the demonstration teacher
teacher, facilitator or resource
Satisfactory execution of the lesson plan and Satisfactory mentoring services
speaker at the school level and 3% 3 4 5 3 4.00 0.12
provided to the demonstration teacher
or provided mentoring services
to demonstration teachers. Fair execution of the lesson plan and Fair mentoring services provided to the
2
demonstration teacher.
Poor execution of the lesson plan and Poor mentoring services provided to the
1
demonstration teacher
100% of the test results were analyzed and interpreted per grading period and
5
submitted before the scheduled time.
84%-99% of the test results were analyzed and interpreted per grading period and
4
submitted before the scheduled time.
68%-83% of the test results were analyzed and interpreted per grading period and
Interpret test results and utilize. 3% 3 4 3 2 4.00 0.12
submitted before the scheduled time.
52%-67 of the test results were analyzed and interpreted per grading period and
2
submitted before the scheduled time.
51%-below of the test results were analyzed and interpreted per grading period and
1
submitted before the scheduled time.
Initiated a full blown project and program that enhance the curriculum and achieve
5
75% in NAT Performance.
Initiate projects and programs Initiated a full blown project and program that enhance the curriculum and achieve
4
that will enhance the 65%-74% in NAT Performance.
curriculum and its delivery to 3% Initiated a full blown project and program that enhance the curriculum and achieve 4 4 2 3.33 0.10
3
achieve 75% NAT 55%-64% in NAT Performance.
performance. Initiated a full blown project and program that enhance the curriculum and achieve
2
54%-below in NAT Performance.
Provision of 1 the project or program did not materialized
Quality Basic
100% of the teachers were observed quarterly and submitted the observation
Education 5
checklist form at the end of the quarter.
84%-99% of the teachers were observed quarterly and submitted the observation
4
checklist form at the end of the quarter.
Observe teachers every 68%-83% of the teachers were observed quarterly and submitted the observation
5% 3 4 3 2 3.00 0.15
quarter. checklist form at the end of the quarter.
52%-67 of the teachers were observed quarterly and submitted the observation
2
checklist form at the end of the quarter.
51%-below of the teachers were observed quarterly and submitted the observation
1
checklist form at the end of the quarter.

Conduct mentoring/coaching
activities and prepare
instructional material available.
Instructional
Supervision
(20%)
Guided co-teachers in the
performance of duties and
responsibilities.
Check lesson plans of teachers
in the assigned grade/subject
area.
Conduct regular/periodic PTA
meetings/conferences
Conducted mentoring/coaching activities to 100% of the teachers and prepared
5
innovative instructional materials fully documented.
Conducted mentoring/coaching activities to 84%-99%% of the teachers and
4
prepared innovative instructional materials fully documented.
5% Conducted mentoring/coaching activities to 68%-83% of the teachers and prepared 4 1 2 2.33 0.12
3
innovative instructional materials fully documented.
Conducted mentoring/coaching activities to 52%-67% of the teachers and prepared
2
innovative instructional materials fully documented.
1 no evidence of mentoring/coaching conducted
100% of the teachers were guided and provided with the necessary technical
5
assistance in the carry-over of their duties and functions.
84%-99% of the teachers were guided and provided with the necessary technical
4
assistance in the carry-over of their duties and functions.
68%-83% of the teachers were guided and provided with the necessary technical
5% 3 4 5 2 3.67 0.18
assistance in the carry-over of their duties and functions.
52%-67 of the teachers were guided and provided with the necessary technical
2
assistance in the carry-over of their duties and functions.
51%-below of the teachers were guided and provided with the necessary technical
1
assistance in the carry-over of their duties and functions.
100% of the teachers lesson plan/log were properly checked and submitted the
5
observation log every end of the month.
84%-99% of the teachers lesson plan/log were properly checked and submitted the
4
observation log every end of the month.
68%-83% of the teachers lesson plan/log were properly checked and submitted the
5% 3 4 5 1 3.33 0.17
observation log every end of the month.
52%-67 of the teachers lesson plan/log were properly checked and submitted the
2
observation log every end of the month.
51%-below of the teachers lesson plan/log were properly checked and submitted
1
the observation log every end of the month.
100% of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set agreements
5
were fully documented.
84%-99% of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set
4
agreements were fully documented.
68%-83% of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set
5% 3 4 5 3 4.00 0.20
agreements were fully documented.
52%-67% of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set
2
agreements were fully documented.
51%-below of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set
1
agreements were fully documented.

Community
Involvement
(15%)

Community
Involvement
(15%)
Visit parents of pupils/students
needing academic
monitoring/follow up
Undertake/initiate
projects/events/activities with
external funding/sponsorship
Conducted action research
Take charge of the school
reading program, remedial
and/or enrichment program.
Professional
Growth and
Development
(15%)
Participate in the planning and
implementation of training
programs in school, district and
division level.
100% of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was followed up
5
supported with documents.
84%-99% of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was followed
4
up supported with documents.
68%-83% of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was followed
5% 3 2 2 2 2.00 0.10
up supported with documents.
52%-67 of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was followed
2
up supported with documents.
51%-below of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was
1
followed up supported with documents.
5 100% of project accomplishment completed were achieved with documentation.
4 84%-99% of project accomplishment partially achieved with documentation.
5% 3 68%-83% of project accomplishment partially achieved with documentation. 5 5 5 5.00 0.25
2 52%-67 of project accomplishment partially achieved with documentation.
1 51%-below of project accomplishment partially achieved with documentation.
Conducted a completed action research and have presented in at least in the
5
Division Level Research Conference/Summit
Conducted a completed action research and have presented in at least in the
4
District Level Research Conference/Summit
5% 2 2 4 2.67 0.13
Conducted a completed action research but have not presented the result in any
3
level of research conference/summit
2 Proposed an action research.
1 Conceptualize an action research
Led at least 5 teachers in conducting enrichment program to improve proficiency
5
level of at least 4 pupils to at least one step higher in every quarter.
Led at least 5 teachers in conducting enrichment program to improve proficiency
4
level of at least 2 pupils/students to at least one step higher in every quarter.
4% Led at least 3 teachers in conducting enrichment program to improve proficiency 3 5 3 3.67 0.15
3
level of at least 3 pupils to at least one step higher in every quarter.
Led at least 3 teachers in conducting enrichment program to improve proficiency
2
level of at least 1 pupils/students to at least one step higher in every quarter.
1 No evidence of conducting remedial program
Participated in the planning of at least 1 training program conducted in the division
5
level and submitted the consolidated outputs before the scheduled time.
3% 3 3 3 3.00 0.09
 Growth and
Development
(15%)

Participate in the planning and Participated in the planning of at least 2 training programs conducted in the district
4
implementation of training level and submitted the consolidated outputs before the scheduled time.
3% 3 3 3 3.00 0.09
programs in school, district and Participated in the planning of at least 1 training program conducted in the district
division level. 3
level and submitted the consolidated outputs before the scheduled time.
Participated in the planning of at least 2 training program conducted in the school
2
level and submitted the consolidated outputs before the scheduled time
1 No evidence of participation in planning training programs
Attended 3 or more seminars, workshops trainings and echoed to teachers in an
5
excellent way with documentation
Participate in seminars, Attended 2 seminars, workshops trainings and echoed to teachers in an excellent
4
workshops, trainings within a way with documentation
3% 2 2 2 2.00 0.06
year (Division, Regional and
National) 3 Attended 3 or more seminars, workshops trainings but failed to echo to teachers.
2 Attended 2 seminars, workshops trainings but failed to echo to teachers.
1 No trainings attended
Attain five of the following: 5 Attained 5 indicators with documents

1. Published at least one (1)

article in professional
4 Attained 4 indicators with documents
magazines/ periodicals related
to field of specialization.

2. Served as resource person/

consultant in seminar/
3 Attained 3 indicators with documents
workshop/ training related to
Plus Factor field of specialization.
5% 1 1 1 1.00 0.05
(5%) 3. Conducted action research
the findings/ results of which
2 Attained 2 indicators with documents
were utilized within the rating
period.
4. Designed evaluation and
monitoring program for the 1 Attained 1 indicator with documents
district/ division.
5. Teacher-In-Charge of a
school for one rating period

TOTAL (Excluding Plus Factor) 100% OVER - ALL RATING OF ASSESSMENT 3.40

Plus Factor 5% ADJECTIVAL RATING Satisfactory

Adjectival Rating Scale
Outstanding 4.500 5.000 Ratee: Rater:
Very Satisfactory 3.500 4.499
Satisfactory 2.500 3.499 MARK Y. SALAS CYNTHIA S. ESPIRITU, HT - III
Unsatisfactory 1.500 2.499 Teacher - I School Head
Poor 1.000 1.499
 Republic of the Philippines
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Bicol Region
DIVISION OF catanduanes
Caramoran North
Caramoran Rural Development High School
Toytoy, Caramoran, Catanduanes

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) FOR TEACHERS

June 2016 - April 2017

Name of Employee: ANJO

G. TUGAY Name of Rater: Josefa S. Zape
Position: TEACHER III Position: Head Teacher - III/School Head
School: Caramoran Rural Development High School Date of Review:

TO BE FILLED UP DURING PLANNING TOB FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

KEY RESULT WEIGHT ACTUAL

MAJOR FINAL AREAS RESULTS
OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING SCORE
OUTPUTS
(KRAs) KRA Q E T
5 200 or more updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way
Prepare lesson plans and daily
lesson logs of activities 4 150-199 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way
including appropriate, 10% 3 90-149 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way 2 2 2 2.00 0.20
adequate and updated 2 60-89 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way
instructional materials
1 1-59 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way
Facilitate learning through the 5 10 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate and updated
use of written/computerized 4 8 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate and updated
lesson plans, modules, 3 6 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate and updated
teaching guides, and other 10% 5 4 5 4.67 0.47
learning resources with the 2 4 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate and updated
adequate and updated 1 2 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate and updated
instructional materials (Supported with write-up and documentation)
Teaching 5 100% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed
Learning Initiate discipline of students 4 85%-99% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed
Process (30%) including classroom rules, 5% 3 70%-84% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed 4 5 5 4.67 0.23
guidelines and individual and
group task

/marcuz rex/
 Teaching
Learning Initiate discipline of students
Process (30%) including classroom rules, 5% 4 5 5 4.67 0.23
guidelines and individual and
group task 2 55%-69% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed
1 54% and below of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed
100% of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and submitted every last
5
day of the month
Monitor attendance, diversity 85%-99% of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and submitted
appreciation, safe, positive and 4
every last day of the month
motivating environment, over-
70%-84% of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and submitted
all physical atmosphere, 5% 3 5 5 5 5.00 0.25
every last day of the month
cleanliness, and orderliness of
classrooms including proper 55%-69% of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and submitted
2
waste disposal. every last day of the month
54% and below of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and
1
submitted every last day of the month
Indicators:
Monitor, evaluate and maintain
1. Test Questions with TOS
pupil’s/student’s progress
through 2. Class Record (with dates of quizzes, assignments, projects, portfolio,
etc.)
*Assessment for Learning 3. Rating sheets
4. List of pupil’s/student’s output like projects, activities done/performed,
(Formative)
8% etc. 5 4 5 4.67 0.37
All indicators were prepared and submitted two weeks before the scheduled due
*Assessment as Learning 5
time
(Reflective) 4 3 indicators were prepared and submitted one week before the scheduled time
*Assessment of Learning 3 2 indicators were prepared and submitted on the scheduled date
(Summative) 2 1 indicator was prepared and submitted on the scheduled date
*Periodic Test 1 no indicator was prepared and submitted on the scheduled date.
5 100% pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully
Conduct 4 85%-99% pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully
remediation/enrichment
10% 3 70%-84% pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully 5 5 4 4.67 0.47
programs to improve
performance indicators 2 55%-69% pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully
1 54% and below pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully
100% of the pupils/students records were prepared and submitted before the
5
scheduled time without error
Students'
Learning 85%-99% of the pupils/students records were prepared and submitted on or before
4
Outcomes the scheduled time without error
(30%) Maintain pupil’s/students
7% 5 5 4 4.67 0.33
school records

/marcuz rex/
 Students'
Learning
Outcomes
(30%) Maintain pupil’s/students 70%-84% of the pupils/students records were prepared and submitted on or before
7% 3 5 5 4 4.67 0.33
school records the scheduled time with minimal error
55%-69% of the pupils/students records were prepared and submitted one week
2
after the due time
54% and below of the pupils/students records were prepared and submitted two
1
weeks before the due time
85% and above of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required learning
5
competency.
82-84% of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required learning
4
competency
Attain the required GSA for 79%-81% of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required learning
5% 3 5 5 4 4.67 0.23
Grade level and learning areas competency
76%-78% of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required learning
2
competency
75% of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required learning
1
competency
5 Attained 75% and above NAT MPS per subject area
Attain 75% MPS per subject 4 Attained 65%-74% of NAT MPS per subject area.
area in the National 0% 3 Attained 55%-64% of NAT MPS per subject area. 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Provision of Achievement Test
Quality Basic 2 Attained 44%-54% of NAT MPS per subject area.
Education 1 Attained 45% or below of NAT MPS per subject area.
100% of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set agreements
5
were fully documented.
84%-99% of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set
4
agreements were fully documented.
Conduct regular/periodic PTA 68%-83% of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set
8% 3 5 4 5 4.67 0.37
meetings/conferences agreements were fully documented.
52%-67% of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set
2
agreements were fully documented.
51%-below of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set
1
agreements were fully documented.
100% of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was followed up
5
supported with documents.
Community
Involvement 84%-99% of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was followed
4
20% up supported with documents.
Visit parents of pupils/students
needing academic 7% 5 5 4 4.67 0.33
monitoring/follow up

/marcuz rex/
 Community
Involvement
20%
Visit parents of pupils/students
68%-83% of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was followed
needing academic 7% 3 5 5 4 4.67 0.33
up supported with documents.
monitoring/follow up
52%-67 of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was followed
2
up supported with documents.
51%-below of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was
1
followed up supported with documents.
5 100% of project accomplishment completed were achieved with documentation.
Undertake/initiate 4 84%-99% of project accomplishment partially achieved with documentation.
projects/events/activities with 5% 3 68%-83% of project accomplishment partially achieved with documentation. 5 5 4 4.67 0.23
external funding/sponsorship 2 52%-67 of project accomplishment partially achieved with documentation.
1 51%-below of project accomplishment partially achieved with documentation.
Conducted a completed action research and have presented in at least in the
5
Division Level Research Conference/Summit
Conducted a completed action research and have presented in at least in the
4
District Level Research Conference/Summit
Conducted action research 0% 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Conducted a completed action research but have not presented the result in any
3
level of research conference/summit
2 Proposed an action research.
1 Conceptualize an action research
Attended an aggregate of 48 hours of relevant trainings at least in the Division level
5
and earned 9 units in graduate studies
Professional Attended an aggregate of 48 hours of relevant trainings at least in the Division
4
Growth and level.
Attend relevant
Development Attended an aggregate of 24 hours of relevant trainings at least in the Division level
trainings/workshops/conferenc 3
20% 10% 5 5 5 5.00 0.50
es or seminars or earn 9 units and earn 9 units in graduate studies
of post graduate education Attended an aggregate of 24 hours of relevant trainings at least in the Division
2
level.
1 Attended at aggregate of 24 hours training at least in the District level
(Attached certificate of participation and Grades)
5 Received certificate of recognition in the National level.
Received special 4 Received certificate of recognition in the Regional level
awards/citation/recognition for 10% 3 Received certificate of recognition in the Division level 3 3 3 3.00 0.30
exemplary performance 2 Received certificate of recognition in the District level
1 Received certificate of recognition in the School level

/marcuz rex/
 Attain five of the following: 5 Attained 5 indicators with documents

4 Attained 4 indicators with documents

1. Serve as coordinator in any

working committee in the 3 Attained 3 indicators with documents
school
2. Publish an article in national
2 Attained 2 indicators with documents
circulation
Plus Factor 3. Serve as demonstration
5% 4 4 4 4.00 0.20
5% teacher/resource 1 Attained 1 indicator with documents
speaker/cooperating teacher
4. Received an outstanding
employee award at least in the
District level

5. Conducted an innovation

6. Participated in any activities

as teachers’ association

TOTAL (Excluding Plus Factor) 100% OVER - ALL RATING OF ASSESSMENT 4.48

Plus Factor 5% ADJECTIVAL RATING Very Satisfactory

Adjectival Rating Scale
Outstanding 4.500 5.000 Ratee: Rater:
Very Satisfactory 3.500 4.499
Satisfactory 2.500 3.499 ANJO G. TUGAY JOSEPA S. ZAPE - Head Teacher III
Unsatisfactory 1.500 2.499 Teacher III School Head
Poor 1.000 1.499

/marcuz rex/
 Transmutation Table
1.000 1.499 Poor
1.500 2.499 Unsatisfactory
2.500 3.499 Satisfactory
3.500 4.499 Very Satisfactory
4.500 5.000 Outstanding